This invention relates to a nuclear quadrupole resonance detection system and to the use of two or more sensors tuned to the same nuclear quadrupole resonance frequency when detecting the nuclear quadrupole resonance signal, thereby providing improved nuclear quadrupole resonance detection system performance.
The use of nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) as a means of detecting explosives and other contraband has been recognized for some time. See e.g. T. Hirshfield et al, J. Molec. Struct. 58, 63 (1980); A. N. Garroway et al, Proc. SPIE 2092, 318 (1993); and A. N. Garroway et al, IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39, 1108 (2001).
NQR provides some distinct advantages over other detection methods. NQR requires no external magnet such as required by nuclear magnetic resonance. NQR is sensitive to the compounds of interest, i.e. there is a specificity of the NQR frequencies.
One technique for measuring NQR in a sample is to place the sample within a solenoid coil that surrounds the sample. The coil provides a radio frequency (RF) magnetic field that excites the quadrupole nuclei in the sample and results in their producing their characteristic resonance signals. This is the typical apparatus configuration that might be used for scanning mail, baggage or luggage.
There is also need for a NQR detector that permits detection of NQR signals from a source outside the detector, e.g. a wand detector, that could be passed over persons or containers as is done with existing metal detectors. Problems associated with such detectors using conventional systems are the decrease in detectability with distance from the detector coil and the associated equipment needed to operate the system.
A detection system can have one or more devices (such as coils) that both transmit and receive, or it can have separate devices (such as coils) that only transmit and only receive. A transmit, or transmit and receive, coil of an NQR detection system provides a magnetic field that excites the quadrupole nuclei in the sample and results in their producing their characteristic resonance signals that the coil receives. As the NQR signals have low intensity and short duration, the transmit, receive, or transmit and receive, coil preferably has a high quality factor (Q). The transmit, receive, or transmit and receive, coil has typically been a copper coil and therefore has a of about 102.
It can be advantageous to use a transmit, receive, or transmit and receive coil, made of a high temperature superconductor (HTS) rather than copper since the HTS self-resonant coil has a Q of the order of 103-106. The large Q of the HTS self-resonant coil produces large magnetic field strengths during the RF transmit pulse and does so at lower RF power levels. This dramatically reduces the amount of transmitted power required to produce NQR signals for detection, and thereby reduces the size of the RF power supply sufficiently so that it can be run on portable batteries.
The large Q of the HTS self-resonant coil also plays an important role during the receive time. In view of the low intensity NQR signal, it is important to have a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) as large as possible. The signal-to-noise ratio is proportional to the square root of Q so that the use of the HTS self-resonant coil results in an increase in S/N by a factor of 10-100 over that of the copper system.
These advantages during both the transmit and the receive times enable a detector configuration that is small and portable. In particular, the use of a high temperature superconductor sensor receive coil prepared from a high temperature superconductor material, provides a distinct advantage over the use of an ordinary conductor coil.
An object of the present invention is to provide a NQR detection system with improved performance, particularly where the transmit, receive, or transmit and receive coil, is made of a high temperature superconductor.
One embodiment of this invention is a method of detecting nuclear quadrupole resonance in an object by
Another embodiment of this invention is a nuclear quadrupole resonance detection system for detecting nuclear quadrupole resonance in an object, comprising:
A further embodiment of this invention is a nuclear quadrupole resonance detection system for detecting nuclear quadrupole resonance in an object, comprising:
Preferably, the two or more sensors are used solely for sensing, i.e. receiving, the NQR signal, and one or more separate coils are used as the transmit, i.e. excitation, coils to provide the RF magnetic field that excites the quadrupole nuclei in the object to be scanned. Preferably, the two or more sensors are high temperature superconductor coils. More preferably, the two or more sensors are each comprised of a high temperature superconductor self-resonant planar coil, or of two or more coupled high temperature superconductor self-resonant planar coils.
This invention for improving the signal-to-noise ratio and thereby the performance of a nuclear quadrupole resonance detection system is especially important when the nuclear quadrupole resonance detection system is used for detecting the nuclear quadrupole resonance of explosives, drugs and other contraband.
This invention provides a method for increasing the signal-to-noise ratio of a NQR detection system for scanning a potential source of NQR, and also provides a NQR detection system that provides this increased performance. To accomplish this, two or more sensors are tuned to a specified nuclear quadrupole resonance frequency, and the signals detected by each sensor are added coherently. Two or more sensors are tuned to a “specified” nuclear quadrupole resonance frequency in the manner contemplated by this invention when each sensor is tuned to a frequency within a given nuclear quadrupole resonance emission line so that even if each sensor is not tuned to exactly the same frequency, they are all still detecting the same emission line.
A “sensor” as used in this invention is a receive device, such as a receive coil, and the two or more sensors used to detect nuclear quadrupole resonance in a sample or object will typically be used as receive coils only. In certain embodiments, it may be possible to use them as transmit and receive coils, but, preferably, separate coils are used to transmit the RF signal, and the sensors (as their name implies) are used solely as receive coils.
The transmit coils used in this invention can be made of copper, silver, aluminum or a high temperature superconductor. A copper, silver or aluminum coil is preferably in the form of a shielded-loop resonator (SLR) coil. SLR's have been developed to eliminate the detuning effect of the electrical interaction between the coil and the surrounding material. Preferably, a copper SLR transmit coil is used to apply the RF signal to the sample or object to be scanned. In an NQR detection system, provision must of course be made for a power supply to supply power for transmitting the RF pulse.
Preferably, the two or more sensors are high temperature superconductor (HTS) coils. A high temperature superconductor coil is preferably in the form of a self-resonant planar coil, i.e. a surface coil, with a coil configuration of HTS on one or both sides of a substrate. High temperature superconductors are those that superconduct above 77K. High temperature superconductors used to form a HTS self-resonant coil are preferably selected from the group consisting of YBa2Cu3O7, Tl2Ba2CaCu2O8, TlBa2Ca2Cu3O9, (TlPb)Sr2CaCu2O7 and (TlPb)Sr2Ca2Cu3O9. Most preferably, the high temperature superconductor is YBa2Cu3O7 or Tl2Ba2CaCu2O8. A HTS self-resonant coil can be formed by various known techniques. A preferred technique for forming a Tl2Ba2CaCu2O8 coil is described in the example.
It is often advantageous to be able to fine tune the resonance frequency of a sensor. One means for accomplishing such tuning is to use two or more coupled high temperature superconductor self-resonant coils. The resonance frequency of the fundamental symmetric mode of coupled high temperature superconductor self-resonant coils can be varied by mechanically displacing the coils with respect to one another, and such tunable coupled coils may be used as a HTS sensor. A coil used in a coupled configuration is preferably a planar, i.e. surface, coil. A planar coil may have a HTS coil configuration on only one side of the substrate, or may have essentially identical HTS coil configurations on both sides of the substrate. Most preferably, each sensor herein is comprised of a high temperature superconductor self-resonant planar coil, or two or more coupled high temperature superconductor self-resonant planar coils.
As indicated above, when two or more coupled high temperature superconductor self-resonant coils are used as a sensor, the resonance frequency of the fundamental symmetric mode of the coupled high temperature self-resonant coils can be varied by mechanically displacing the coils with respect to one another. Means for tuning the resonance frequency of a sensor to a specified nuclear quadrupole resonance frequency thus includes the mechanical displacement of coupled coils as described above.
Alternatively, for a sensor comprised of one or more high temperature superconductor self-resonant coil coils, means for tuning the resonance frequency of the sensor to a specified nuclear quadrupole resonance frequency may include a circuit. The circuit can be comprised of a single loop or coil to inductively couple the circuit to the high temperature superconductor self-resonant sensor, a reactance in series with the single loop or coil, and means for connecting and disconnecting the reactance to and from the single loop or coil. In essence, the tuning circuit is resonated, which causes a mode split by coupling to the self-resonant high temperature superconductor sensor.
In the tuning circuit, the single loop or coil can be made of a regular conductor such as copper or a high temperature superconductor. The reactance can be an inductance, capacitance or combination of both. Means for connecting and disconnecting the reactance to and from the single loop or coil may include at least one mechanical switch, or electrical switch such as a diode. Preferably, the reactance can be varied so that the resonance frequency can be adjusted to more than one frequency. One way of providing a variable reactance is to utilize as the reactance two or more capacitors in parallel, each of which can be individually connected to or disconnected from the single loop or coil. Alternatively, a variable reactance can be prepared from two or more inductors in series, each of which can be individually connected to or disconnected from the single loop or coil by a mechanical or electrical switch that can short-circuit the inductor and thereby essentially remove it from the circuit.
The NQR signals detected by the two or more sensors used in this invention can be added coherently, i.e. the phases of the individual signals are, by various analog and digital techniques, adjusted to add constructively. In the analog technique for coherent addition, the electrical path from each sensor to the combination point, at which the signals are added, is adjusted so that the signals add constructively at the combination point. When the sensors are essentially equidistant from the object that is the source of the nuclear quadrupole resonance signal, the electrical path from each sensor to the combination point can be made essentially identical, thereby insuring that the signals add constructively at the combination point.
Means for adding signals may also be provided, which may include a microprocessor for performing various digital techniques for coherent addition. In a digital technique, for example, the signal detected by each sensor may be multiplied before combination by a constant complex factor that can be measured or calculated to correct for phase differences between the signal paths and thereby insure that the signals add constructively at the combination point. The constant complex factor is specific to the electrical path from each sensor to the combination point. Typically, the signals will be amplified before they are added.
In this invention, the advantages in using in an NQR system an array of two or more sensors over the use of a single sensor can be seen as follows. The signal S obtained by using an array of n sensors and coherently adding the signals is proportional to n. Assuming that the noise present is random, the noise N, after the coherent addition, is proportional to n0.5. Therefore S/N is proportional to n0.5, i.e. is proportional to the square root of n. An array of two sensors therefore increases S/N by a factor of 1.4. An array of four sensors increases S/N by a factor of 2.
The use of HTS self-resonant coils as sensors makes the instant invention especially attractive. The HTS self-resonant coils have high Q's and relatively small size and make the use of an array of two or more sensors more feasible. If one or more HTS coils are used herein as sensors, provision must be made for cooling the HTS to at least liquid nitrogen temperature.
The advantageous effects of this invention are demonstrated by an example, as described below. The embodiments of the invention on which the example is based are illustrative only, and do not limit the scope of the appended claims. The purpose of the example is to demonstrate the increase in S/N when two sensors are used to detect a frequency and the signals from the sensors are added coherently.
HTS self-resonant sensors are provided, each of which is two coupled essentially identical Tl2Ba2CaCu2O8 planar coils. Each of the coupled coils is on a lanthanum aluminate (LaAlO3) substrate with the coil design configuration shown in
A clean, polished single crystal LaAlO3 substrate with a diameter of 2 inches (5.1 cm) and an approximate thickness of 0.02 inches (0.5 mm) was obtained from Litton Airtron, Morris Plains, N.J. Off-axis magnetron sputtering of a Ba:Ca:Cu oxide target is used to deposit, at room temperature (about 20° C.), an amorphous precursor Ba:Ca:Cu oxide film on both sides of the substrate. This amorphous Ba:Ca:Cu oxide film is about 550 nm thick and had a stoichiometry of about 2:1:2. The precursor film is then thallinated by annealing it in air for about 45 minutes at 850° C. in the presence of a powder mixture of Tl2Ba2Ca2Cu3O10 and Tl2O3. When this powder mixture is heated, Tl2O evolves from the powder mixture, diffuses to the precursor film and reacts with it to form the Tl2Ba2CaCu2O8phase on both sides of the substrate.
The Tl2Ba2CaCu2O8 is then coated with photoresist on both sides and baked. A coil design mask with the design shown in
The result is a coil structure comprised of the single crystal LaAlO3 substrate with a high temperature superconductor Tl2Ba2CaCu2O8 pattern of the configuration shown in
A schematic diagram of the experimental set-up used to demonstrate the increase in S/N when two sensors are used, and the signals from the sensors are added coherently, is shown in
The transmit loop 16 is comprised of a loop of copper wire approximately 2 cm in diameter. The transmit loop 16 is placed so that the sensors 11 and 12 are approximately equidistant from it, i.e. about 0.5 m away from each of the sensors, with the plane of the transmit loop parallel to the planes of the coils of the sensors. The transmit loop is formed by removing the outer jacket and dielectric spacer from a piece of 0.080 inch (2 mm) coax cable 17. The transmit loop is formed by bending the inner conductor into a circle and soldering it to the outer jacket of the coax cable just outside the point where the jacket and dielectric are removed. The signal generator provided a −10 dBm signal at a frequency of 3.6 MHz. Two pick-up coils 18 and 19, each comprised of a loop of copper wire, are placed about 1 inch (2.5 cm) away from the sensors 11 and 12, respectively, with the planes of the pick-up coils parallel to the planes of the coils of the sensors. Each of the pick-up coils 18 and 19 is formed by removing the outer jacket and dielectric spacer from a piece of 0.080 inch (2 mm) coax cable 20 and 21, respectively. The loop is formed by bending the inner conductor into a circle and soldering it to the outer jacket of the coax cable just outside the point where the jacket and dielectric are removed. The coax cables 20 and 21 are each connected to a 93 ohm 2 m piece of RG62 cable 22 and 23, respectively, which are connected to a 50 ohm tee 24 combination point. This insured that the electrical phase along the two paths is essentially the same. The output of the tee 24 combination point is fed to a Spectrum Analyzer R&S FSP 25 (Rohde & Schwarz GmbbH & Co., KG, Munchen, Germany).
The signal with only one sensor present is compared to that obtained using the two sensors. The use of the two sensors resulted in a 6 dB increase in signal. This demonstrates the increase in S/N when two sensors are used to detect a frequency and the signals from the sensors are added coherently.
While the discussion herein is presented primarily in terms of the use of a coil as the transmit, receive or transmit and receive device, this invention is not limited thereto, and is applicable to transmit, receive and transmit and receive devices that may have a configuration other than that of a coil.
Where an apparatus or method of this invention is stated or described as comprising, including, containing, having, being composed of or being constituted by certain components or steps, it is to be understood, unless the statement or description explicitly provides to the contrary, that one or more components or steps other than those explicitly stated or described may be present in the apparatus or method. In an alternative embodiment, however, the apparatus or method of this invention may be stated or described as consisting essentially of certain components or steps, in which embodiment components or steps that would materially alter the principle of operation or the distinguishing characteristics of the apparatus or method would not be present therein. In a further alternative embodiment, the apparatus or method of this invention may be stated or described as consisting of certain components or steps, in which embodiment components or steps other than those as stated would not be present therein.
Where the indefinite article “a” or “an” is used with respect to a statement or description of the presence of a component in an apparatus, or a step in a method, of this invention, it is to be understood, unless the statement or description explicitly provides to the contrary, that the use of such indefinite article does not limit the presence of the component in the apparatus, or of the step in the method, to one in number.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/541,660, filed on Feb. 4, 2004, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/557,235, filed on Mar. 29, 2004, each of which is incorporated in its entirety as a part hereof for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3373348 | Vanier et al. | Mar 1968 | A |
3764892 | Rollwitz | Oct 1973 | A |
4027768 | Riessen | Jun 1977 | A |
4072768 | Fraser et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4514691 | De Los Santos et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
5036279 | Jonsen | Jul 1991 | A |
5135908 | Yang et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5206592 | Buess et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5233300 | Buess et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5258710 | Black et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5262394 | Wu et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5276398 | Withers et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5351007 | Withers et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5418213 | Tanaka et al. | May 1995 | A |
5457385 | Sydney et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5583437 | Smith et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585723 | Withers | Dec 1996 | A |
5592083 | Magnuson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594338 | Magnuson | Jan 1997 | A |
5656937 | Cantor | Aug 1997 | A |
5661400 | Plies et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5750473 | Shen | May 1998 | A |
5751146 | Hrovat | May 1998 | A |
5804967 | Miller et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814987 | Smith et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814989 | Smith et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814992 | Busse-Gravitz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5872080 | Arendt et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5952269 | Ma et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5973495 | Mansfield | Oct 1999 | A |
5986455 | Magnuson | Nov 1999 | A |
5999000 | Srinivasan | Dec 1999 | A |
6026719 | Anderson | Feb 2000 | A |
6054856 | Garroway et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6088423 | Krug et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091240 | Smith et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104190 | Buess et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108569 | Shen | Aug 2000 | A |
6150816 | Srinivasan | Nov 2000 | A |
6166541 | Smith et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169399 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194898 | Magnuson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201392 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6218943 | Ellenbogen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6242918 | Miller et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6291994 | Kim et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6335622 | James et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6370404 | Shen | Apr 2002 | B1 |
D459245 | Power | Jun 2002 | S |
6420872 | Garroway et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6486838 | Smith et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6538445 | James et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6541966 | Keene | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556013 | Withers | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6566873 | Smith et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6590394 | Wong et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6617591 | Simonson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6653917 | Kang et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6751489 | Shen | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751847 | Brey et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6777937 | Miller et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6819109 | Sowers et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822444 | Lai | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6847208 | Crowley et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6952163 | Muey et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6956476 | Buess et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958608 | Takagi et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7049814 | Mann | May 2006 | B2 |
7106058 | Wilker et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20020068682 | Shen | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020153891 | Smith et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156362 | Bock et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169374 | Jevtic | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020190715 | Marek | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030020553 | Gao et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030062896 | Wong et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030071619 | Sauer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030119677 | Qiyan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030136920 | Flores et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040124840 | Reykowski | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040222790 | Karmi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040251902 | Takagi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050104593 | Laubacher et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122109 | Wilker et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050140371 | Alvarez et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050146331 | Flexman et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050206382 | Laubacher et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050248345 | Alvarez | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050258831 | Alvarez | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264289 | Alvarez | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050270028 | Alvarez et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060012371 | Laubacher et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060038563 | Cisholm et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060082368 | McCambridge | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060119360 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 426 851 | May 1991 | EP |
1 122 550 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1 168 483 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 416 291 | May 2004 | EP |
1 477 823 | Nov 2004 | EP |
2 286 248 | Aug 1995 | GB |
2 289 344 | Nov 1995 | GB |
05 269 108 | Oct 1993 | JP |
07 265 278 | Oct 1995 | JP |
WO9217793 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO9217794 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO9219978 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO9221989 | Dec 1992 | WO |
WO9405022 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO9534096 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9639636 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO9639636 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO9639638 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO9837438 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9854590 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO9945409 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO9950689 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0070356 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 02082115 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 02098364 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03014700 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03040761 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03096041 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004001454 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004102596 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 05059582 | Jun 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070176600 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60557235 | Mar 2004 | US | |
60541660 | Feb 2004 | US |