As pointed out by the NIH (National Institutes of Health) in a recent RFA (Request for Applications) “3.8 million Americans are transfused with 28.2 million blood components derived from 12.8 million units of blood donated by apparently healthy volunteers.” Blood products are extensively tested for the presence of pathogens prior to administration in the developed world. Nevertheless, there exists a small, but finite risk of transmission of infectious agents in a transfusion. In its RFA, the NIH estimated the risk during transfusion “of a unit of screened blood is 1/1,000,000 for hepatitis A virus (HAV), is 1/30,000-1/50,000 for hepatitis B (HBV), 1/30,000-1/150,000 for hepatitis C (HCV), 1/20,000-1/2,000,000 for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), 1/250,000-1/2,000,000 for human T-cell lymphotropic viruses (HTLV) types I and II and 1/10,000 for parvo virus B1. Furthermore, the estimated frequency of bacterial contamination of red blood cells is 1/500,000 units and the risk of platelet-related sepsis is estimated to be 1/12,000” as of the year 2000.
The risks of viral infection are due to the “window period,” the period of time between the infection of a donor and the development of detectable levels of antibodies. The introduction of nucleic acid testing (NAT) has shortened the window period and further decreased the incidence of units of blood products containing pathogens. NAT was introduced for HIV and HCV in the United States in 1998. This new technology has greatly reduced the risk as the window period has been dramatically decreased. The window period for HIV was reduced from 22 days to 11 days and the window period for HCV has been reduced from 70 days to 8-10 days. This new technology has brought the risks per unit of donated blood to 1:1,800,000 for HIV and 1:1,600,000 for HCV. When these statistics are compared to the current risk of 1:220,000 associated with HVB, a virus for which NAT is not currently performed, the need for additional pathogen reduction technologies is apparent. As the blood supply in the developed world is relatively safe, any technology that further decreases the incidence of pathogens in blood products must itself be incredibly safe to be of net benefit to public health.
Sadly, blood products are still not screened prior to administration in many parts of the world. In underdeveloped countries, the cost of introducing testing protocols exceeds the local resources. The blood supply in too many countries tragically contains high levels of pathogens, especially parasitic organisms such as those responsible for Chagas Disease and Malaria. New technology which can improve the safety of the blood supply in underdeveloped portions of the globe must be simple and inexpensive if it is to receive widespread use.
A simple technology which has been used to sterilize at least some portions of the blood such as plasma is UV light. However, pathogens are composed of the same amino acid, nucleic acid, and lipid building blocks as plasma proteins, platelets, and red cells. Consequently, there is no known wavelength of light which can be selectively deposited into pathogens in the presence of blood products. Pathogens, plasma proteins, and platelets absorb UVB (280-320 nm) and UVC (200-280 nm) radiation. This inactivates pathogens, but with unacceptable damage to plasma proteins and platelets. Red cells absorb this type of radiation so strongly that one cannot inactivate pathogens with UVB and UVC radiation in their presence. UVA radiation (320-400 nm) alone does not inactivate a virus. It does, however, shorten the shelf life of platelets.
This fact has led practitioners to study sensitizers. By definition, sensitizers absorb light and initiate chemical reactions that inactivate pathogens. Thus, it is no surprise that sensitizers themselves undergo chemical change upon photolysis. Therefore, not only must the ideal sensitizer be innocuous, but every molecule it degrades to upon photolysis must be non-toxic and non-mutagenic as well.
Ideally, a sensitizer will absorb long wavelength light (λ>400 nm) that is not absorbed by plasma proteins or platelets. If the sensitizer binds only to pathogen, in the presence of plasma protein and platelets, radiant energy in the UVA or visible region of the spectrum can be deposited selectively into the pathogen, even in the presence of blood components. This can lead to inactivation of the pathogen, in principle, by various chemical reaction mechanisms.
In the absence of pathogen, the ideal sensitizer will not bind to transfusable blood product. Thus the ideal sensitizer must recognize and exploit a chemical difference between the pathogen and the blood product. There is a chemical difference between many pathogens and plasma proteins. Bacteria and many types of virus are encapsulated by phospholipid membranes or envelopes, but plasma proteins are not. Pooled plasma is treated with solvent detergent that dissolves membranes and inactivates many types of pathogens without damage to the plasma protein. Recently, Cerus Corporation has developed a technology for pathogen reduction of platelets that has been approved for use in Europe. At this time there is no pathogen eradication technology used to treat red cells before their administration in transfusion medicine, anywhere in the world.
A successful photochemical technology that will eradicate pathogens present in blood products requires that the perfect sensitizer has the following properties: the ideal sensitizer must bind to pathogenic particles but must not bind to plasma proteins, platelets or red blood cells. Secondly, the ideal sensitizer should be non-toxic, non-mutagenic and must not break down to compounds that are toxic and mutagenic. It should be readily available, water soluble, and inexpensive. Finally, the ideal sensitizer must absorb UV and/or visible radiation. Absorption of radiation must produce a short-lived, highly-reactive toxin, which creates lesions in its immediate vicinity (e.g., only to the pathogenic particle to which it is bound).
Molecules that are currently under investigation, which fulfill many of the above-mentioned requirements, have flavin moieties and are members of the alloxazine family, in particular, riboflavin.
This invention is directed towards a process for substantially preventing damage to blood components in a fluid which contains pathogens having nucleic acids. The process includes adding to the fluid a sensitizer having a flavin moiety; letting the sensitizer bind to the nucleic acids of the pathogens; irradiating the fluid and sensitizer with light at a wavelength between 500-550 nm to activate the sensitizer which is bound to the nucleic acid of the pathogen; and inactivating the pathogen.
Riboflavin (RB, vitamin B2) is a vitamin essential to the human diet. It is present in aerobic organisms and is found in many foodstuffs such as milk, beer, eggs, yeast and leafy vegetables. It is also the precursor for flavin mononucleotide (FMN) and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), which are major coenzymes that participate in a number of one-electron processes in the human body.
Riboflavin has absorption maxima at 220, 265, 375, and 446 nm in water and is yellow-orange in color. When aqueous solutions containing riboflavin are exposed to sunlight, riboflavin is converted into lumichrome (LC) under neutral conditions, and into lumiflavin (LF) in alkaline solutions. LC is also a known metabolic breakdown product of riboflavin in the human body.
Flavin systems are known to be photochemically active, and products of flavin photochemistry are known to react with a host of biological molecules, often with clinical implications.
Advantages of using riboflavin as a sensitizer include the fact that riboflavin is “Generally Regarded As Safe” or GRAS by the FDA. Its photochemical breakdown products (lumichrome and lumiflavin) are metabolites of riboflavin and thus are formed naturally in vivo. Inadvertent riboflavin photolysis takes place in the blood of neonates treated for hyperbilirubinemia. In vivo riboflavin photochemistry does not lead to an incidence of cancer in treated neonates. Secondly, riboflavin can be activated with visible light that is not absorbed strongly by plasma or platelets. Thirdly, platelets treated with riboflavin and light, under conditions which inactivate high titers of pathogen, circulate normally when reinfused into autologous hosts.
Thus, technology based on an endogenous sensitizer like riboflavin is much more likely to be both efficacious and safe than technology based on a synthetic sensitizer (e.g. a psoralen or methylene blue). Riboflavin also has the advantage over other possible synthetic photosensitizers because it is a naturally occurring, essential vitamin-with no known toxicity.
Use of riboflavin as a sensitizer in a pathogen reduction procedure to pathogen reduce blood and blood components has been disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,258,577 and 6,277,337.
Riboflavin Photophysics and General Photochemistry
Sensitizer photophysics and photochemistry of riboflavin, can be usefully summarized with the aid of the Jablonski diagram below. The sensitizer in its ground electronic state is referred to as S0. Upon absorption of light, the sensitizer is converted to an electronically excited state that, in the condensed phase, immediately (<<10−11s) relaxes to the lowest vibrational level of the lowest excited state (S1). The lifetimes of S1 states in solution are usually in the range of 0.1-10 ns and are controlled by internal conversion (IC) and fluorescence (F) decay back to S0, by intersystem crossing (ISC) to a paramagnetic triplet state (T1) and by inter- and intramolecular chemical reactions. Because S1 is short-lived, bimolecular reactions of S1 will be inefficient unless the trapping agent is rather concentrated (0.1-1.0 M) or the sensitizer and the trap are complexed. A sensitizer bound to protein or nucleic acid will likely react in its S1 state. Common reactions of S1 are electron transfer and cycloaddition. Fluorescence quenching is characteristic of bimolecular reactions of S1.
Sensitizer triplet states are much longer lived than excited singlet states. Their lifetimes are typically controlled by bimolecular reactions, particularly reaction with oxygen, a molecule with a triplet ground state. This reaction often leads to the formation of singlet oxygen, a potent oxidizing agent that is employed in many lipid-targeted, photosensitized, viral inactivation strategies.
The generally accepted major photochemical processes available to riboflavin (RB) in the presence of a suitable substrate (R—H), such as electron-rich amino acids (e.g. tryptophan and tyrosine) or guanosine, are shown below.
The first step in the photochemistry of RB is the excitation of the singlet ground state (S0) to the singlet excited state (1RB*, S1). The singlet excited state can fluoresce (φF=0.26, τF=5 ns, 520 nm), or undergo rapid intersystem crossing, ISC, (φISC=0.7) to the triplet excited state (3RB*, T1, τT
Riboflavin Photochemistry as a Sensitizer
Nucleic Acid Targeted Sensitizers
All potential pathogens present in the blood supply (with the possible exception of prions) contain genomic nucleic acids. Viruses may be either RNA or DNA based, single or double stranded, enveloped or non-enveloped, but all contain nucleic acids. Genomic nucleic acids have the specific purpose to propagate the organism or cellular population in which it is located. Plasma proteins, platelets, and red cells do not contain genomic nucleic acids. Plasma proteins are composed of amino acids and do not contain nucleic acids. Platelets are generated from other blood cells but they themselves do not reproduce. Platelets do have mitochondrial DNA, but do not possess genomic DNA. Human red cells have no nucleus and do not contain any nucleic acid.
To a crude, first approximation, any genomic nucleic acid present in a unit of donated blood is undesirable. The only genomic nucleic acid material in a unit of blood products would be due to either bacterial or viral pathogens. A sensitizer, which binds nucleic acids but does not bind to phospholipids or proteins, might be able to exploit this chemical difference and selectively inactivate virus and bacteria in the presence of plasma protein, platelets, and red cells. Therefore, technology that can damage the nucleic acid framework while leaving the remaining blood components untouched will be a useful method for sterilizing blood and blood components.
As discussed above, UV radiation damages DNA, but it also damages many other biological compounds as well. If a compound can bind DNA, and upon activation, cause enough damage such as nicks and cross-links, then the DNA cannot be repaired and replicated. Riboflavin is known to bind weakly to nucleic acid. It has been shown by Dardare et. al that riboflavin has little affinity for albumin and for phospholipids, but it does have a small but finite binding affinity for calf thymus DNA. From Scatchard plots, Kuratomi and Kobayashi have deduced that one flavin or alloxazine molecule is bound to every 500 nucleotides of native nucleic acids. Since riboflavin appears to selectively bind DNA, and since riboflavin can be photo-excited with low energy visible light, which is expected to be more selective with respect to undesired photolytic damage of the DNA bases themselves, riboflavin is under study as a sensitizer of nucleic acid damage in the presence of other biological chromophores. One possible site of riboflavin sensitized DNA damage is in the sugar backbone of the helix and the electron-rich guanosine residues.
Riboflavin sensitized photolysis of DNA produces 8-oxoguanosine and single strand breaks in addition to adducts of flavin and nucleic acid. Cadet and coworkers have shown that excited riboflavin can accept an electron from guanosine to form the guanosine radical cation. Subsequent hydrolysis of the guanosine radical cation also produces 8-oxoguanosine. Thus 8-oxoguanosine can be formed by more then one mechanism and at least by one mechanism without the intervention of singlet oxygen, hydrogen peroxide or superoxide ion.
Yamamoto, Nishimura and Kasai have analyzed the DNA of cultured mammalian cells (mouse lymphoma line L5178Y) exposed to riboflavin and visible light and found that 8-oxoguanosine was produced. Previously, Hoffman and Meneghini discovered that photolysis of green monkey kidney cells and riboflavin led to the formation of single strand breaks of the cellular DNA. Thus, it is a straightforward conclusion that photolysis of intracellular riboflavin produces intracellular oxidants that damage cellular DNA and/or that photolysis of extracellular riboflavin generates extracellular hydrogen peroxide that can passively transport to the cell nucleus and damage the cellular DNA. There seems little doubt that this is the mechanism for much cellular DNA damage but Cadet's work indicates that it is probably not the only intracellular riboflavin sensitized photochemistry which transpires. Furthermore, Ennever and Speck have demonstrated the flavin-nucleic acid adducts are formed when riboflavin and nucleic acids are exposed to visible light. The formation of these adducts is not oxygen dependent.
Photolysis of RB
It is well known that long-lived oxidants such as hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion are produced when riboflavin in water or growth medium is exposed to visible light. These effects are enhanced in the presence of electron donors such as tryptophan and tyrosine. Short-lived oxidants such as singlet oxygen are also formed upon photolysis of riboflavin.
The first step in the formation of long lived oxidants involves electron transfer from a donor (tryptophan, tyrosine, ground state flavin) to either the excited singlet or triplet state of riboflavin to form the flavin radical anion (RB·). The reaction scheme for the formation of superoxide from riboflavin (RB) is shown below.
There are many plausible mechanisms by which reactive oxygen species (ROS) can be formed from the radical anion of the flavin. An electron can be transferred from the radical anion of riboflavin to oxygen to form superoxide anion. Alternatively, protonation of the reduced flavin forms a neutral radical RBH·which can react with oxygen to form a hydroperoxy radical (RBOO·). The reaction pathway for the formation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) from irradiated riboflavin (RB) is shown below.
Complete reduction of riboflavin forms leukoflavin, RBH2. This species is stable in solution in the absence of oxygen. However, it reacts very rapidly with oxygen to form hydrogen peroxide and to regenerate riboflavin. In this manner the photochemical formation of hydrogen peroxide can be catalytic rather than stoichiometric in riboflavin. The simplicity of the overall reaction of leukoflavin with oxygen is deceptive. The overall reaction is actually a multistep sequence involving superoxide ion.
Hydrogen peroxide and superoxide ion both react with guanosine residues of cellular DNA. Isolation and digestion of the cellular DNA yields either 8-oxoguanosine or 8-oxoguanine depending on the methodology employed to digest the nucleic acid.
Hydrogen peroxide also induces single strand breaks when added to nucleic acids, and is toxic to cells.
Action Spectra of Riboflavin
Action spectroscopy is a general approach used to identify the species containing the chromophore that is responsible for a specific photochemical or photobiological reaction. The most basic action spectrum consists of a plot of a specific response as a function of wavelength at a constant dose of irradiation (fluence), usually in terms of joules per square meter (J/m2). The “specific response” against which the irradiating wavelength is plotted against could be a wide variety of measurements ranging from lethality and viability to growth and induced mutation and even chemical yields and product ratios.
The absorption curves for nucleic acid and protein is shown in
Ideally, an action spectrum should have the following characteristics.
Systems used to study pathogen inactivation often include the study of bacterial viruses or phages, which are easy to handle, provide rapid results, are safer than working with human pathogens, and are available with a wide range of biological variation. For example, many studies aimed at understanding HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) have been performed using the feline variant (FIV) or simian variant (SIV).
Lambda phage is a bacteriophage that has Escherichia coli as its host. Lambda phage contains double-stranded DNA that is loosely encapsulated within a protein sheath. Approximately 50,000 DNA base pairs account for about 50% of the total lambda phage mass, the rest of which arises from protein. Lambda phage enters into the host via the receptor that transports maltose the cell. Once inside the host, the phage can reproduce.
One method for determining the titer of viable phage is by a plaque assay. Lambda phage plaque assays have been used in a wide variety of scientific investigations, including those involving the genotoxicity of illuminated riboflavin and viral inactivation from photosensitizers that bind DNA.
In a plaque assay, a sample containing the phage in question is diluted serially (10-fold) and each resulting solution is incubated in an excess of the bacterial host. This phage-host mixture is then plated out in agar with the appropriate growth media and the bacteria are permitted to propagate under favorable growth conditions specific for the bacteria.
When an individual host cell is infected, the phage propagates and the host undergoes lysis. The ruptured host then releases its cellular contents and the propagated phage into the agar matrix, which then infects neighboring bacteria. This cycle continues until a “plaque” is formed, which is a small circular region devoid of bacterial growth in the bacterial lawn on the agar support. In this way, one can count the number of plaques on an agar plate originating from a solution with a known dilution factor. The starting titer of phage can then be calculated from the collected data. By comparing the titer of a sample before and after a specific treatment, the amount of phage inactivation can be determined.
Using the methods described above, an action spectrum of the riboflavin-sensitized inactivation of lambda phage may answer several interesting and useful questions.
The action spectra of the inactivation of lambda phage in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 μM riboflavin was determined between 266-575 nm. Each irradiated sample is based on 2.5 mL of solution in a 3.0 mL quartz cuvette. Each data point was performed in triplicate and the reported value reflects the average of these three values. As shown in
Action Spectra: 266-304 nm
It has been known for many years that UV radiation with wavelengths of less than or equal to 304 nm is lethal to cells. However, the effect of the addition of the photosensitizer riboflavin, on the action spectrum in this region was not known. As can be seen in
As shown in
Although the quantity of phage inactivation decreases with increasing riboflavin concentration when the sample is irradiated between 266-304 nm, this does not necessarily mean that riboflavin is acting only as a screening agent. One concern that exists when considering methods of pathogen inactivation is the possibility of host re-activation. Basically, defense and repair mechanisms (within bacteria and existing in hosts for viruses) have the ability to repair DNA damage and reverse pathogen inactivation. In systems that have undergone a specific type of stress that leads to damage (i.e. peroxides), particular repair mechanisms may be stimulated and be activated to repair this type of damage to the pathogens. The result is less-than-expected pathogen inactivation. Therefore, it would be beneficial to control the type of damage that is responsible for pathogen inactivation to a type that is more difficult to repair. As a result, the DNA damage would not be as efficiently repaired and the viral titer would remain low instead of rebounding due to DNA repair.
When DNA is irradiated with UV light, most of the damage consists of thymine-thymine dimers (T<>T). In terms of quantum yield, the majority of the energy of photoexcited DNA is lost to the system in the form of heat rather than chemical change. In the presence of riboflavin, the photochemistry of DNA could then follow a different pathway. If light that is absorbed by DNA results in a guanosine excited-state singlet, *G1, which then relaxes to the excited-state triplet, *G3, then an electron transfer can occur from guanosine to riboflavin. Alternatively, triplet thymine could undergo an energy transfer to riboflavin, which could then react with an electron donor such as guanosine. The guanosine radical cation can then be oxidized by water to form 8-oxo-guanosine, which is a lesion that is less easily repaired. Therefore, there may be a benefit from riboflavin in the inactivation of lambda phage from 266-304 nm that is manifest as a more lethal DNA lesion that is not as easily repaired by host reactivation.
Action Spectra: 308-575 nm
To achieve the same magnitude of log reduction that was observed between 266-304 nm, the energy required for the experiments between 308-575 nm was increased 50-fold from 0.1 J/mL to 5.0 J/mL.
This action spectra is shown in
The action spectra do not correlate perfectly with the absorption curve of either riboflavin or lumichrome over the entire wavelength regime. There appears to be essentially an identical amount of viral inactivation at 355 and 500 nm, although the optical densities (of solutions containing the same concentration of riboflavin) differ by a factor of five at these wavelengths. There also appears to be a large amount of inactivation at 320 nm, which was contrary to expectations, as riboflavin in water does not have an absorption maximum in this region. The inactivation at about 500 nm is slightly higher than expected compared to the absorption curve of riboflavin and the inactivation at 375 nm where riboflavin absorbs is lower than expected. Additionally, the region between 308 nm (the point at which the riboflavin switches from screening direct absorption of light by the phage to sensitized inactivation) and 350 nm appears to have more riboflavin sensitized inactivation than expected based upon the absorption curve of riboflavin.
An area where the inactivation in the presence of riboflavin is larger than expected is at 500 nm. Since there is no inactivation at this wavelength in the absence of sensitizer, the value added of riboflavin is very clear.
When the log reduction of phage is 0.5 logs or lower, concern exists that the magnitude error bars of the assay are approaching that of the data itself. Since the area in the action spectrum around 500 nm is of interest, a closer examination was performed in this region. Therefore, the action spectrum points were redone at 500, 510, 530, 550, and 575 nm with 0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 uM riboflavin and with 25 J/mL of delivered laser radiation. When these results are examined, an interesting feature begins to emerge.
Examination of the data obtained after exposure to 25 J/mL between 500-575 nm reveals that there may be an additional inactivation maxima at 550 nm.
Since this action spectra now strongly suggests that there is another region of significant viral inactivation well beyond the absorption curve of aqueous riboflavin, the action spectra from 500-550 nm (
The data suggests that there may be a new region of increased viral inactivation in the region between 500-520 nm and possibly at 550 nm.
Binding of Flavins
Any riboflavin that is bound to phage in the action spectra studies is in such minute concentrations that a UV-visible shift due to bound flavin is impossible to obtain, although the effect of bound flavin could dominate the action spectra. Therefore any shifts in the UV-visible absorption spectra due to flavin binding to several biological macromolecules was studied.
A route to study the possible shift in absorption spectra due to riboflavin binding includes the study of aptamer binding. Aptamers are specific sequences of RNA that have a high binding affinity for a specific substrate. Several literature reports indicate that an aptamer that tightly binds FMN may be a suitable model to study absorption spectra shifts upon riboflavin binding. As mentioned above, FMN is the phosphorylated form of riboflavin. FMN is more water soluble then riboflavin, but the flavin moiety is identical to that of riboflavin. It can be extrapolated from the below data that riboflavin would behave identically to FMN. The aptamer sequence (GGC GUG UAG GAU AUG CUU CGG CAG AAG GAC ACG CC) was custom synthesized, purified, and deprotected and was used as received. The aptamer was prepared in RNAse free buffer PBS (autoclaved with 0.1% diethyl pyrocarbonate [DEPC]) containing 0.1 mM EDTA and 4 mM Mg+2. The magnesium was reported to be critical for proper folding of the aptamer and consequent binding of the flavin ring of FMN.
The difference spectra were obtained with both 100 and 200 μM each RNA aptamer and FMN. Only the data for the 200 μM concentrations are shown in
The negative values in the difference spectrum (ca. 370 and 445 nm) are due to the lower molar absorptivity of the bound flavin compared to the free flavin. If one could obtain a spectrum of pure aptamer-bound FMN, the result would be an absorption spectrum with an absorbance greater than or equal to zero at all points (i.e. no subtraction error). One can express the final concentration of the species after binding by the following equation, where χ is the concentration of the FMN-aptamer complex at equilibrium.
Therefore, an absorption spectrum containing only the flavin-RNA complex could be obtained if the absorption spectrum corresponding to 200-χμM FMN is subtracted from the absorption spectrum of the FMN and aptamer mixture.
This difference spectrum is shown in
In an attempt to correct for the subtraction error of the difference spectrum and to obtain a spectrum close to that of pure nucleic acid-bound flavin, the spectrum of free FMN was systematically diminished and subtracted from the spectrum containing the bound flavin. The results of this study are shown in
For example, in the spectrum shown in
If the flavin is bound within the phage, the flavin absorption spectrum may shift due to the differing dielectric constant of the binding region. To probe this area, the absorption spectrum of an aqueous solution of riboflavin was compared to a solution (with the same riboflavin concentration) containing different ratios of other solvents in an attempt to observe an absorbance shift due to a change in the dielectric constant.
As can be seen from
Using the outcome of these aptamer studies, it may be hypothesized that if the majority of light below 500 nm is removed, it may be possible to selectively activate only riboflavin which is bound to nucleic acids. Because these studies show that unbound riboflavin is not activated at wavelengths of 500 nm and higher, only riboflavin which is bound to nucleic acids will be activated. Selective activation of bound riboflavin may decrease the potential for indiscriminate damage to cell membranes by the photolysis of unbound riboflavin, which as described above, produces hydrogen peroxide. This effect may be of greater concern in a pathogen reduction procedure of red blood cells due to the high level of oxygen which are present in red blood cells.
The method of this invention requires adding the riboflavin to the fluid to be pathogen reduced. The riboflavin and fluid may also be mixed together. Mixing may occur simply through the addition of riboflavin or a solution containing the riboflavin to the fluid to be decontaminated. Mixing may also occur via mechanical means within the illumination chamber.
In an embodiment, the fluid and riboflavin are placed in a photopermeable container such as a blood bag and irradiated in batch mode, preferably while agitating the container to fully distribute the photosensitizer throughout the fluid and expose all the fluid to the radiation.
The fluid containing the photosensitizer is exposed to light at a wavelength of above 500 nm to activate only the riboflavin and pathogenic nucleic acid complex. As discussed above, unbound riboflavin is not activated at this wavelength, so collateral damage to the cells caused by the photolysis of unbound or free riboflavin will be avoided. Light at a wavelength above 500 nm may be obtained by using LEDs which produce light in a very narrow band centered at 500 nm (not shown). Light in a broader spectrum such as that produced by fluorescent bulbs 50 (shown in
This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/377,524, filed Feb. 28, 2003, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/586,147, filed Jun. 2, 2000, now abandoned, which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/357,188, filed Jul. 20, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,277,337, which is a Continuation-In-Part of Ser. No. 09/119,666 filed Jul. 21, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,258,577. This application also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional No. 60/580,311, filed Jun. 15, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
683690 | Johnson | Oct 1901 | A |
1733239 | Roberts | Oct 1929 | A |
1961700 | Moehler | Jun 1934 | A |
2056614 | Moehler | Oct 1936 | A |
2212230 | Goldmann | Aug 1940 | A |
2212330 | Thomas | Aug 1940 | A |
2340890 | Lang et al. | Feb 1944 | A |
2786014 | Tullis | Mar 1957 | A |
3456053 | Crawford | Jul 1969 | A |
3629071 | Sekhar | Dec 1971 | A |
3683177 | Veloz | Aug 1972 | A |
3683183 | Vizzini et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3705985 | Manning et al. | Dec 1972 | A |
3776694 | Leittl | Dec 1973 | A |
3852032 | Urbach | Dec 1974 | A |
3864081 | Logrippo | Feb 1975 | A |
3874384 | Deindoerfer et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3894236 | Hazelrigg | Jul 1975 | A |
3926556 | Boucher | Dec 1975 | A |
3927325 | Hungate et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4061537 | Seiler et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4112070 | Harmening | Sep 1978 | A |
4124598 | Hearst et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4139348 | Swartz | Feb 1979 | A |
4169204 | Hearst et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4173631 | Graham et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4181128 | Swartz | Jan 1980 | A |
4196281 | Hearst et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4264601 | Trachewsky | Apr 1981 | A |
4267269 | Grode et al. | May 1981 | A |
4312883 | Baccichetti et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4321918 | Clark, II | Mar 1982 | A |
4321919 | Edelson | Mar 1982 | A |
4336809 | Clark | Jun 1982 | A |
4390619 | Harmening-Pittiglio | Jun 1983 | A |
4398031 | Bender et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4398906 | Edelson | Aug 1983 | A |
4402318 | Swartz | Sep 1983 | A |
4407282 | Swartz | Oct 1983 | A |
4421987 | Herold | Dec 1983 | A |
4424201 | Valinsky et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4428744 | Edelson | Jan 1984 | A |
4432750 | Estep | Feb 1984 | A |
4456512 | Bieler et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4457918 | Holick et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4464166 | Edelson | Aug 1984 | A |
4467206 | Taylor et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4474153 | Rock et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4481167 | Ginter et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4493981 | Payne | Jan 1985 | A |
4568328 | King | Feb 1986 | A |
4572899 | Walker et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4573960 | Goss | Mar 1986 | A |
4573961 | King | Mar 1986 | A |
4573962 | Troutner | Mar 1986 | A |
4576143 | Clark, III | Mar 1986 | A |
4578056 | King et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4585735 | Meryman et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4596547 | Troutner | Jun 1986 | A |
4604356 | Blake, II | Aug 1986 | A |
4608255 | Kahn et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4609372 | Carmen et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4612007 | Edelson | Sep 1986 | A |
4613322 | Edelson | Sep 1986 | A |
4614190 | Stanco et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4623328 | Hartranft | Nov 1986 | A |
4626431 | Batchelor et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4642171 | Sekine et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4645649 | Nagao | Feb 1987 | A |
4648992 | Graf et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4649151 | Dougherty et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4651739 | Oseroff et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4675185 | Kandler et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4683195 | Mullis et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4683202 | Mullis | Jul 1987 | A |
4683889 | Edelson | Aug 1987 | A |
4684521 | Edelson | Aug 1987 | A |
4693981 | Wiesehahn et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4695460 | Holme | Sep 1987 | A |
4704352 | Miripol et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4708715 | Troutner et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4726949 | Miripol et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4727027 | Wiesehahn et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4737140 | Lee et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4748120 | Wiesehahn | May 1988 | A |
4769318 | Hamasaki et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4775625 | Sieber | Oct 1988 | A |
4788038 | Matsunaga | Nov 1988 | A |
RE32874 | Rock et al. | Feb 1989 | E |
4828976 | Murphy | May 1989 | A |
4831268 | Fisch et al. | May 1989 | A |
4833165 | Louderback | May 1989 | A |
4861704 | Reemtsma et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4866282 | Miripol et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4878891 | Judy et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4880788 | Moake et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4915683 | Sieber | Apr 1990 | A |
4921473 | Lee et al. | May 1990 | A |
4925665 | Murphy | May 1990 | A |
4930516 | Alfano et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4946438 | Reemtsma et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4948980 | Wedekamp | Aug 1990 | A |
4950665 | Floyd | Aug 1990 | A |
4952812 | Miripol et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4960408 | Klainer et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4961928 | Holme et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4978688 | Louderback | Dec 1990 | A |
4986628 | Lozhenko et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4992363 | Murphy | Feb 1991 | A |
4994367 | Bode et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4998931 | Slichter et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
4999375 | Bachynsky et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5011695 | Dichtelmuller et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5017338 | Surgenor | May 1991 | A |
5020995 | Levy | Jun 1991 | A |
5030200 | Judy et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5039483 | Sieber et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5041078 | Matthews et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5089146 | Carmen et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5089384 | Hale | Feb 1992 | A |
5092773 | Levy | Mar 1992 | A |
5114670 | Duffey | May 1992 | A |
5114957 | Hendler et al. | May 1992 | A |
5120649 | Horowitz et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5123902 | Müller et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5133932 | Gunn et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5147776 | Koerner, Jr. | Sep 1992 | A |
5149718 | Meruelo et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5150705 | Stinson | Sep 1992 | A |
5166528 | Le Vay | Nov 1992 | A |
5184020 | Hearst et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5185532 | Zabsky et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5192264 | Fossel | Mar 1993 | A |
5211960 | Babior | May 1993 | A |
5216251 | Matschke | Jun 1993 | A |
5229081 | Suda | Jul 1993 | A |
5232844 | Horowitz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5234808 | Murphy | Aug 1993 | A |
5236716 | Carmen et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5247178 | Ury et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5248506 | Holme et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5250303 | Meryman et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5258124 | Bolton et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269946 | Goldhaber et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5273713 | Levy | Dec 1993 | A |
5281392 | Rubinstein | Jan 1994 | A |
5288605 | Lin et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5288647 | Zimlich, Jr. et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5290221 | Wolf, Jr. et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300019 | Bischof et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5304113 | Sieber et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5318023 | Vari et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5340716 | Ullman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342752 | Platz et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5344752 | Murphy | Sep 1994 | A |
5344918 | Dazey et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5358844 | Stossel et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5360734 | Chapman et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5366440 | Fossel | Nov 1994 | A |
5376524 | Murphy et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5378601 | Gepner-Puszkin | Jan 1995 | A |
5418130 | Platz et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419759 | Naficy | May 1995 | A |
5427695 | Brown | Jun 1995 | A |
5433738 | Stinson | Jul 1995 | A |
5459030 | Lin et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5466573 | Murphy et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474891 | Murphy | Dec 1995 | A |
5482828 | Lin et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5487971 | Holme et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5494590 | Smith et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5503721 | Hearst et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512187 | Buchholz et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5516629 | Park et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527704 | Wolf, Jr. et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5536238 | Bischof | Jul 1996 | A |
5545516 | Wagner | Aug 1996 | A |
5547635 | Duthie, Jr. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550111 | Suhadolnik et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5556958 | Carroll et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556993 | Wollowitz et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557098 | D'Silva | Sep 1996 | A |
5569579 | Murphy | Oct 1996 | A |
5571666 | Floyd et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5587490 | Goodrich, Jr. et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5593823 | Wollowitz et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5597722 | Chapman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5607924 | Magda et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5622867 | Livesey et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624435 | Furumoto et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624794 | Bitensky et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628727 | Hakky et al. | May 1997 | A |
5639376 | Lee et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5639382 | Brown | Jun 1997 | A |
5643334 | Eckhouse et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652096 | Cimino | Jul 1997 | A |
5653887 | Wahl et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5654443 | Wollowitz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5656154 | Meryman | Aug 1997 | A |
5656498 | Iijima et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658530 | Dunn | Aug 1997 | A |
5658722 | Margolis-Nunno et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5683661 | Hearst et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683768 | Shang et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5686436 | Van Dyke | Nov 1997 | A |
5688475 | Duthie, Jr. | Nov 1997 | A |
5691132 | Wollowitz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5698524 | Mach et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5698677 | Eibl et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702684 | McCoy et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707401 | Talmore | Jan 1998 | A |
5709653 | Leone | Jan 1998 | A |
5709991 | Lin et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5709992 | Rubinstein | Jan 1998 | A |
5712085 | Wollowitz et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712086 | Horowitz et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714328 | Magda et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5736313 | Spargo et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5739013 | Budowsky et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5753428 | Yuasa et al. | May 1998 | A |
5756553 | Iguchi et al. | May 1998 | A |
5769839 | Carmen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772960 | Ito et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5783093 | Holme | Jul 1998 | A |
5789150 | Margolis-Nunno et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5789151 | Bitensky et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5789601 | Park et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798238 | Goodrich, Jr. et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798523 | Villeneuve et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5817519 | Zelmanovic et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827644 | Floyd et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5834198 | Famulok et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840252 | Giertych | Nov 1998 | A |
5843459 | Wang et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5846961 | Van Dyke | Dec 1998 | A |
5854967 | Hearst et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5866074 | Chapman et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5869701 | Park et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871900 | Wollowitz et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876676 | Stossel et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899874 | Jonsson | May 1999 | A |
5906915 | Payrat et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908742 | Lin et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919614 | Livesey et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922278 | Chapman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935092 | Sun et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5955256 | Sowemimo-Coker et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955257 | Burger et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965349 | Lin et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976884 | Chapman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6017691 | Wollowitz et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020333 | Berque | Feb 2000 | A |
6060233 | Wiggins | May 2000 | A |
6063624 | Kandler et al. | May 2000 | A |
6087141 | Margolis-Nunno et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
7094378 | Goodrich et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0066886 | Jun 1982 | EP |
0124 363 | Apr 1984 | EP |
0108 588 | May 1984 | EP |
0196 515 | Mar 1986 | EP |
0184 331 | Jun 1986 | EP |
0491 757 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0525 138 | Dec 1991 | EP |
0590 514 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0679 398 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0510 185 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0754 461 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0801 072 | Oct 1997 | EP |
2674 753 | Oct 1992 | FR |
2715 303 | Jul 1995 | FR |
2718 353 | Oct 1995 | FR |
2034463 | Jun 1980 | GB |
WO 8302328 | Jul 1983 | WO |
WO 8502116 | May 1985 | WO |
WO 8906702 | Jul 1989 | WO |
WO 9000059 | Jan 1990 | WO |
WO 9102529 | Mar 1991 | WO |
WO 9208348 | May 1992 | WO |
WO 9208349 | May 1992 | WO |
WO 9211057 | Jul 1992 | WO |
WO 9217173 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO 9300005 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO 9407426 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO 9407499 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO 9502325 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9511028 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 9512973 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9516348 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9614740 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9614741 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9707674 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9718844 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9722245 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9736581 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9736634 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9830545 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9831219 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9841087 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9851147 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9856247 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9911305 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9959645 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0011946 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0128599 | Apr 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050282143 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60580311 | Jun 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09586147 | Jun 2000 | US |
Child | 10377524 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10377524 | Feb 2003 | US |
Child | 11154503 | US | |
Parent | 09357188 | Jul 1999 | US |
Child | 09586147 | US | |
Parent | 09119666 | Jul 1998 | US |
Child | 09357188 | US |