(Not Applicable)
1. Technical Field
The present invention relates to the field of multimedia transfer and control. More particularly, the instant invention relates to a method and apparatus for dynamically controlling and referencing digital media independent of the point of access.
2. Description of the Related Art
Users, both business and consumers, are increasingly becoming accustomed to having large amounts of digital data delivered from various media-on-demand (MOD) systems. The continuing evolution from narrowband to broadband networks has fueled a growing need for digital data delivery by facilitating the transmission of broadband data not only by wired means, but also by wireless means. For example, the Internet, with its myriad of text, audio and video content, and its omnipresent availability, can provide consumers with a wealth of information that is practically accessible from anywhere through numerous wired and wireless means. As networks which provide access to digital data continue to evolve, the networks improve their ability to more efficiently distribute and serve bandwidth demanding streaming audio and video content to consumers.
Various forms of wired access methodologies have been created to provide consumer access to the various broadband networks. For example, cable modem service provided by cable service operators can provide Local Area Network (LAN) type access speeds via the same coaxial cable that carries cable signals to the premises of a subscriber. The cable modems used in these systems can support; transmission speeds on the order of several megabits per second depending upon whether the network is engineered to use a symmetrical or an asymmetrical topology. These systems are orders of magnitude faster than narrowband systems, which typically can provide transmission speeds ranging from 28 Kbps to 56 Kbps. Digital Subscriber Loop (DSL) technology also can provide broadband access to subscribers, albeit, through traditional Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) copper twisted pair lines. DSL modems, although not as fast as cable modems today, are touted to provide downstream speeds approaching 2 Mbps and upstream speeds approaching 512 Kbps depending upon the underlying network implementation.
Several wireless access technologies have been used to provide broadband wireless access to consumers. For example, the Reunion Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) manufactured by Nortel Networks Corporation of Brampton, P.O. provides a digital point-to-multipoint technology operating at frequencies ranging from 24 GHz to 38 Ghz. Additionally, Bluetooth™, a wireless technology for providing a short range radio link between various small form factor data devices, can operate at 2.45 GHz with transmission speeds of 721 Kbps. Finally, various other technologies, such as Fixed Wireless Loop, Wireless Local Loop, Local Multipoint Distribution System (LMDS) and Multichannel Multipoint Distribution System (MMDS) have be used to provide broadband access to subscribers.
The growth and gradual switch from narrowband to broadband access and services has eased user access to digital media by decreasing download time, consequently increasing user willingness to access digital media networks. This growth in network access and subscriber willingness has fueled the need to provide subscriber terminals to access the various broadband services. Typical subscriber access devices include, PCs, TVs, set-top boxes, handheld computers, wireless LAN devices, and audio devices that have the capability to download digital media content from the Internet for later playback and viewing.
Consequently, a new problem of user/subscriber control over the transmission of digital media has arisen from the development of MOD services, broadband access and the existence of a myriad of access devices, each having its own capabilities and access characteristics. Current systems lack functionality for accessing specific digital media on a first access device in a viewing session, and subsequently continuing the viewing session by allowing access of the same digital media from a second access device. For example, with present systems, a user viewing a movie delivered through a TV at home, cannot terminate the delivery of the movie only to resume the delivery of the same movie at a later time. Additionally, current systems do not permit one to resume delivery of a movie at a later time through a different access device, for example a PC. Finally, current systems do not permit the resumption of the delivery of the movie to an access device positioned in a location that differs from that in which the original access began, namely, the home. Accordingly, given the limitations and inflexibility/present in current MOD systems, there exists a need to provide a more efficient and flexible system and method for providing configurable access to digital media in a MOD system.
The present invention can include a method for providing configurable access to media in a media-on-demand system. The method can include the steps of delivering the media to a first client device through a first communications link; recording a bookmark specifying a position in the media; and delivering the media to a second client device through a second communications link. Significantly, the delivery to the second client device can begin at the position specified by the recorded bookmark. The method can further include the steps of identifying device properties for each of the first and second client devices; and, delivering the media to the first and second client devices through the respectively established first and second communications links. Notably, the client device properties can include the client device type, particular media formats which can be processed by the client device and the type of communications link which can be supported by the client device.
In one aspect of the present invention, the media can be delivered to first and second client device sessions through first and second communications links respectively. Generally, in this aspect of the present invention, the first and second client device sessions can reside in a single client device. However, the invention is not limited in this regard and the first and second client device sessions can reside in first and second client devices.
Notably, the media can be delivered in a format compatible with the identified device properties. Specifically, in one aspect of the invention, the media is stored in a media-on-demand server (MODS) and delivered to the first and the second client devices via the first and the second communications link respectively. In another aspect of the invention, the step of delivering the media to the first client device via the first communications link, can include receiving the media from the MODS in an intermediate server. In the intermediate server, the media can be converted to a format compatible with the identified device properties of the first client device; and the converted media can be delivered to the first client device via the first communications link.
In another aspect of the invention, the step of delivering the media to a second client device via the second communications link can include receiving the media in an intermediate server from the MODS. In the intermediate server, the media can be converted to a format compatible with the identified device properties of the second client device. Subsequently, the converted media can be delivered to the second client device via the second communications link.
In one aspect of the present invention, the method also can include the steps of storing the media in selected ones of a plurality of media-on-demand servers. Each MODS in the plurality of media-on-demand servers can store the media in at least one format compatible with a selected device type. A MODS can be selected for delivering the media to the first client device. The selected MODS can have stored thereon the media in a format compatible with the first client device. Subsequently, the media can be delivered from the selected MODS in a format compatible with the first client device. Likewise, a MODS can be selected for delivering the media to the second client device, wherein the selected MODS has stored thereon the media in a format compatible with the second client device. Subsequently, the media can be delivered from the selected MODS in a format compatible with the second client device.
The selecting step can further include determining if a MODS is available for delivering the media to the first client device in a format compatible with the first client device. If it is determined that a MODS is not available for delivering the media to the first client device in a format compatible with the first client device, a MODS can be selected for delivering the media to the first client device. Notably, the selected MODS can contain the media in a standard format. As such, the media in the standard format can be converted to a format compatible with the first client device.
Similarly, the selecting step can further include determining if a MODS is available for delivering the media to the second client device in a format compatible with the second client device. If it is determined that a MODS is not available for delivering the media to the second client device in a format compatible with the second client device, a MODS can be selected for delivering the media to the second client device. Notably, the selected MODS can contain the media in a standard format. As such, the media in the standard format can be converted to a format compatible with the second client device.
A method for providing configurable access to media in a media-on-demand system also can include delivering the media to a first client device in a format compatible with the first client device; interrupting the delivery of the media; recording a bookmark specifying a position in the media where the interruption occurred; and resuming delivery of the media to a second client device, the resumed delivery beginning at a position in the media specified by the recorded bookmark. The method further can include identifying device properties for each of the first and second client devices; delivering the media to the first client device in a format compatible with the identified device properties for the first client device; and, delivering the media to the second client device in a format compatible with the identified device properties for the second client device.
The present invention also can include a user-controlled media-on-demand system. The system can include a media-on-demand server (MODS) for delivering media to client device sessions; a first communications link between the MOOS and a first client device session; a second communications link between the MODS and a second client device session; and, a bookmark in the MODS specifying a position in the delivered media. Notably, the MODS can deliver media to the first client device session over the first communications link. Similarly, the MODS can deliver the media to the second client device session over the second communications link beginning at the position specified by the bookmark. Notably, the first and second client device sessions can reside in first and second client device sessions. Alternatively, the first and second client device sessions can reside in a single client device.
In one aspect of the invention, the system can also include an intermediate server disposed between the MODS and the client devices. In particular, the intermediate server can receive the delivered media from the MODS. Also, the intermediate server can identify device properties for each of the client devices. In consequence, the intermediate server can convert the delivered media to a media format compatible with the identified device properties for each client device. Finally, the intermediate server can deliver the converted media to the client devices.
In another aspect of the invention, the system can include a plurality of media-on-demand servers. Each MODS in the plurality of media-on-demand servers can store media in at least one format compatible with a specific device type. Also, the system can include an intermediate server which can identify a device type of a client device. In consequence, the intermediate server can select a MODS in the plurality of media-on-demand servers for delivering the media to the client device. The selected MODS can store the media in a format compatible with the identified device type. Upon being selected, the MODS can deliver the media to the client device in the format compatible with the identified device type.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, the system can further include a backup MODS for storing media in a standard format compatible with a standard device type; and, a conversion filter in the intermediate server. The intermediate server can determine if a MODS in the plurality of media-on-demand servers is available for delivering the media to the client device in a format compatible with the client device. The intermediate server also can select the backup MODS if it is determined that no MODS is available for delivering media to the client device in a format compatible with the client device. The backup MODS can deliver the media to the intermediate server in the format compatible with the identified device type. As a result, the intermediate server can convert the media to a format compatible with the identified device type in the conversion filter.
There are presently shown in the drawings embodiments which are presently preferred, it being understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown, wherein:
The present invention is a user-controlled, multi-device, media-on-demand system. The media-demand-system of the present system can provide users with the ability to receive delivered media across a network in a client device through a communications link to a media-on-demand server (MODS) regardless of the properties of the client device and the characteristics of the communications link. Specifically, the MODS can deliver particular media to the client device in a format consonant with the properties of the client device which can include device type, acceptable media format and communications link speed and reliability.
Significantly, the user can interrupt the delivery of the delivered media to a client device session in a client device, and subsequently the user can resume the delivery of the delivered media in a seamless manner. Notably, the delivery can resume in a new client device session in a different client device, or in a new client device session in the same client device as the initial client device session. Additionally, the delivery can resume regardless of the timing of the resumption of the delivery and of the properties of the client device through which the user receives the resumed delivery.
Specifically, the user can resume the delivery of a previously interrupted reception of delivered media through a particular client device and a corresponding communications link each of which may have properties which differ from the client device and corresponding communications link of the interrupted delivery. Upon resumption of the delivery, the properties of the new client device can be determined and the format of the delivered media dynamically changed to accommodate the new client device. Moreover, the delivery can resume at a position in the delivered media, corresponding to the position in the delivered media which had been most recently delivered to the client device prior to the interruption.
Client access devices (client devices) 110 and 120 are connected to access networks 105 via connections 107 and 117. Connections 107 and 117 may be wired or wireless connections. Typical wired connections include but are not limited to narrowband POTS, xDSL, Hybrid Fiber Coaxial (HFC) and cable, which can utilize twisted pair copper wires, coaxial cable, fiber or any combination thereof. Typical wireless connections include but are not limited to Cellular, PCS, CDPD, GPRS and Bluetooth each which typically operate at frequencies in the range of 900 MHz to 38 GHz.
The MODS 100 can be comprised of a plurality of access interfaces since it supports access by different kinds of client devices. For example, the MODS 100 can have a Ethernet interface that supports a TCP/IP stack, an X.25 interface to support communication with public data networks that utilize the X.25 protocol, or a T1 interface to support traffic from a public switched telephone network (PSTN).
In addition to supporting various access methodologies, the MODS 100 can store delivered media in a variety of formats, wherein each format is compatible with a particular type of client access device. For example, the MODS 100 may store particular delivered media in MPEG1, MPEG2, Digital Video Broadcast, Quicktime, etc. As a result, the ability to store delivered media in different formats provides the flexibility to serve delivered media to differing types of client devices.
Alternatively, the MODS 100 merely can store a single default format of the delivered media. However, when a request for delivered media is received from a client device having a particular device type, the MODS 100 can identify the device type and transcode or convert the delivered media from the default format to a format compatible with the identified client device type. For example, if the device type of client access device 120-1 can process delivered media formatted in the WML protocol, upon receiving a request for delivered media from the client access device 120-1, the MODS 100 can transcode the delivered media from the default format to WML.
In one representative embodiment of the invention, whenever a client device, for example client device 110, attempts to access delivered media services through the MODS 100, the MODS 100 can attempt to identify device type of the client device 110. In particular, the MODS 100 can send an initial query to the client device 110 requesting that the client device 110 report its device type. Alternatively, the client device 110 can transmit the device type indication with the initial access request. Hence, the client device type can be identified with a minimum of communications required.
Configuration information can include, but is not limited to screen characteristics, such as size, color or grayscale, I/O capabilities such as speakers, printer types, supported media formats and buffer size. While it might be preferable to acquire the configuration information dynamically, it should readily be understood by one skilled in the art that alternative methods are possible without departing from the spirit of the invention. For example, the client device configuration information could be acquired at the time a user subscribes to a delivered media subscription. Alternatively, the client device configuration information can be provided manually. Finally, the client device configuration information can be acquired from client device configuration data which can be pre-stored in a database and indexed according to client device type or user.
In a representative embodiment of the present invention, the client device 110-1 can have corresponding configuration information which has been pre-stored in static memory of the client device, such as a Read-Only-Memory (ROM). In consequence, the configuration information can be transferred electronically to the MODS 100 over the network 105, either at the initial access or when the client device 110-1 accesses the network 105. In the latter case, if there are changes to the client device configuration, the ROM can be reprogrammed such that the updated client device information can remain available to the MODS 100.
Returning now to
Due to the varied nature of the type of communication links that can be used for communication between the client device 110-1 and the MODS 100, the MODS 100 can attempt to evaluate the connection by using, for example, pacing stream 235. Hence, MODS 100 could use the pacing stream 235 consisting of a regulated stream of messages sent to client device 110-1, in order to ascertain the bandwidth of the connection. Metrics such as the arrival times and the interstitial times can be measured by the client device 110-1 and reported to the MODS 100 through a respond with bandwidth message 240. These metrics then can be used to determine network latency and the bandwidth requirements. Although the metrics can be measured by the MODS 100, in one representative embodiment, the metrics are measured by the client device 110-1.
Referring now to
Significantly, the MODS 100 can store bookmarks within the local memory of the MODS 100. The bookmarks can be used in the conventional sense inasmuch as the bookmarks can store a location in the delivered media related to a position in the delivered media which most recently had been transmitted to the client device 110-1. Notably, the bookmark does not necessarily store the position in the delivered media which had been transmitted most recently to the client device 110-1. Rather, the bookmark also can store a position preceding that position which had been most recently transmitted to the client device 110-1 so that the resumption of delivery of the delivered media at a later time can overlap the delivered media previously transmitted to the client-device 110-1.
While the MODS 100 can retain a subscriber record which can contain a bookmark indicating the subscribers delivered media history, in one embodiment of the present invention, the ISP 300 can retain the subscriber record and the MODS 100 can retain at least a partial copy of the subscriber record. One reason for this system of dual retention is that a user may have several bookmarks of which many may never be used. Notably, the several bookmarks may have been created based upon the delivery of media to a single client device or to a plurality of different client devices having differing formats. As an example, in the architecture shown in
In a further aspect of the invention, copies of the bookmark can be stored both at the ISP 300 and at the MODS 100. In consequence, in the event the copies of the bookmark fall out of synchronization, such as can happen whenever there is a power outage during a software upgrade, then the user of a client device 110-1 can be given the option to select which copy of the bookmark is the correct copy. Once the correct version of the bookmark has been identified, the correct version can be used to overwrite the incorrect version of the bookmark. The process of updating mismatched copies of the same bookmark can be encoded in a Java applet. Specifically, when a request is made to access information in a time code field of the bookmark record stored in the ISP 300, the copy of the bookmark stored in the MODS 100 can be checked to ensure that the time code entries are the same. In the case where the time code entries are not the same, the Java applet can request that the user select the correct bookmark.
Notably, the data unique to the last presentation of at least a portion of particular delivered media can include, but is not limited to, a MODS identification 415 which can be used to identify a particular MODS from which delivered media can be transmitted to a client in a particular delivery session, a delivered media identifier 420 for identifying particular delivered media to be delivered from the current MODS, a time code 425 of the last viewed second of the delivered media, a time code 430 of the beginning of the last scene/frame/tract in progress, a last format indicator 430 which can specify the format of delivered media last delivered to a client device, for example, MPEG or WML, and a transaction identifier 440 that can be used as a reference to the current transaction between the MODS or ISP and the client device.
Once a MODS 100 has been selected, the ISP server 300 can issue a service request 500 to the MODS 100. The service request 500 can contain the delivered media identification and format. Subsequently, the MODS 100 can acknowledge the service request 500 with a response 505. While often it can be preferable to ensure the security of an online transaction, for example the online verification of a user identity and corresponding payment authorization as shown in steps 510 and 515, one skilled in the art will recognize that the security measures illustrated in
Following the securing of the communications link in steps 510 and 515, the ISP 300 can confirm the availability of the appropriate format of the delivered media by transmitting an availability message to the MODS 100 in step 520. Additionally, in order to determine the bandwidth requirements, the ISP 300 can send a pacing message 525 to the MODS 100. In response, the MODS 100 can send to the ISP 300 a response 530 having the appropriate statistics/measurements necessary to determine the required bandwidth. Still, as one skilled in the art will recognize, steps 525 and 530 are optional and the absence of steps 525 and 530 or the addition of supplemental steps will not detract from the spirit of the invention. For instance, in an alternative embodiment, steps 525 and 530 can be periodically repeated to evaluate and dynamically adjust the bandwidth settings to ensure acceptable Quality of Service.
The ISP 300 can query a bookmark associated with the requested delivered media and the requesting user. From the queried bookmark, the ISP 300 can identify a position from which to resume (or begin as the case may be) delivery of the requested delivered media. Specifically, in step 535 the ISP 300 can request the MODS 100 to begin transmission of the delivered media at the time code indicated by the specified bookmark. After determining the particular position within the delivered media corresponding to the time code in the bookmark, the MODS 100 can resume (or begin) transmission of the delivered media as shown in step 540.
After some time has elapsed, a terminate request for terminating transmission of the delivered media can be received in the ISP 300, possibly from the client device. In response, a request for termination can be transmitted to the MODS 100 in step 545. In response, in step 550 the MODS 100 can terminate the transmission of the delivered media. Additionally, in a representative embodiment in which the ISP 300 stores the bookmark, the time code can be sent from the MODS 100 to the ISP 300. Moreover, other suitable information necessary for creating a new bookmark and for generating user charges for receiving the delivered media can be sent to the ISP 300.
Notably, an Internet Media Aggregator (IMA) 600 can be provided to store bookmarks and to facilitate the conversion of delivered media from a format compatible with one client device type to a format compatible with another client device type. Specifically, delivered media in a format compatible with a first client device type can be retrieved from the MODS 100 by the IMA 600 and dispatched to the first client device without modification. The delivered media in the MODS 100 also can be retrieved by the IMA 600 and dispatched to a second client device. With regard to the second client device however, the IMA 600 can convert the delivered media from a format compatible with the first client device type into a format compatible with the second destination device type.
For example, with reference to
However, due to prior engagements, the user may have to leave home for the airport where he/she is stranded for a few hours. Before leaving home, the user terminates the transmission of the presentation. In consequence, a bookmark of the position in the presentation where the viewing stopped can be recorded in a bookmark stored in the memory of IMA 600. Subsequently, while waiting at the airport, the user can access the network 305 via ISP server 610-2 using client device 620-1. As a result, the ISP server 610-2 can request that the IMA 600 resume the transmission of the interactive video presentation. In particular, the IMA 600 can consult the bookmark and can determine the position in the presentation which had been most recently transmitted to the user's home prior to the user's termination of the transmission.
Once the position has been determined, the IMA 600 also can determine the format compatible with the client device type of the client device 620-1. Specifically, the format can be determined from the configuration information of client device 620-1. Suppose the client device 620-1 can only accept the presentation of delivered media in QuickTime format. As such, IMA 620-1 can convert the MPEG2 format of the delivered media received from the MODS 100-1 into QuickTime format compatible with the client device 620-1. Once the conversion from MPEG2 to QuickTime is complete, IMA 600 can deliver the video presentation to the client device 620-1 via the ISP server 610-2 in a format suitable for receipt by the client device 620-1. Additionally, the IMA 610-2 can request the transmission of the presentation to begin at a point in the presentation defined by the time code field of the bookmark.
In an alternative embodiment, different formats corresponding to each of the supported device types can be stored on one or more of the servers. For example, before doing the conversion from MPEG2 to QuickTime, the IMA 600 could have queried MODS 100-2 to determine if a QuickTime format of the video presentation was already stored in the MODS 100-2. Since MODS 100-2 already had a QuickTime format copy of the presentation, the IMA 600 could have download that copy to the MODS 100-2 rather than having to perform a duplicate conversion of the presentation from MPEG2 to QuickTime.
A further embodiment of the invention can arise in the circumstance of the present example in which the user had forgotten to terminate the session at home because of an urgency to arrive at the airport by a particular time. Once the user accesses the ISP 300 from the airport using client device 620-1, the user can request that the IMA 600 terminate the session in progress with client device 615-1. Subsequently, the user can request that the IMA 600 continue the video presentation session on the client device 620-1.
Notably, since no bookmark previously existed because the user forgot to terminate the session at home, the user can be given the option of estimating a time code that can be proportional to the time of the presentation length. For example, if the video presentation was 2.5 hours (2 hrs:30 mins:00 secs), then entering a time code of 1:30:23 would correspond to a time stamp of 1 hour, 30 minutes and 23 seconds. Hence, if the user wanted to watch the last hour of the video presentation, then the user would enter 01:30:00 as the time code. In order to differentiate this time code from an actual time code, an asterisk (*) could be placed next to the time code to show that it was fictitious.
After the time code has been entered, the IMA 600 can attempt to find a QuickTime format of the video presentation stored on a MODS 100 or convert delivered media in MPEG2 format in MODS 100-1 to QuickTime format. The video presentation then can be streamed from the IMA 600 to the client device 620-1 starting from the entered time code.
A yet further embodiment of the invention can arise in the circumstance of the present example in which the user bookmarked the video presentation before leaving home but intentionally allowed the video presentation to run since someone else at home was watching the video presentation. In this case, when the user arrives at the airport, if the session at home is still in progress, the user can request that the IMA 600 create an additional stream for viewing the presentation on client device 620-1. The user can be charged for additional presentation time and the presentation can begin from the position indicated in the bookmark that the user created before leaving home.
Notably, with regard to the bookmark described herein, it should readily be understood by one skilled in the art that a bookmark does not have to represent the exact point at which the media was discontinued. To compensate for delay or other transitory loss, the bookmark may be placed at a point prior to the actual point of discontinuance of transmission. For example, using a time based bookmark reference, the bookmark may be placed at ten seconds prior to the actual point of discontinuance. Alternately, the bookmark could be placed at the point of discontinuance, and whenever resumption of the media occurs, the resumption is started at a point, for example, 10 seconds prior to the actual point of discontinuance. In addition to using relative time or location based methods for the bookmark, other schemes employing translation of the physical location or time or, any combination thereof, may be utilized.
The present invention can be realized in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. Machine readable storage according to the present invention can be realized in a centralized fashion in one computer system, or in a distributed fashion where different elements are spread across several interconnected computer systems. Any kind of computer system or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein is acceptable. A typical combination of hardware and software could be a general purpose computer system with a computer program that, when being loaded and executed, controls the computer system such that it carries out the methods described herein. The present invention can also be embedded in a computer program product which comprises all the features enabling the implementation of the methods described herein, and which when loaded in a computer system is able to carry out these methods.
A computer program in the present context can mean any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after either or both of the following: (a) conversion to another language, code or notation; and (b) reproduction in a different material form. The invention disclosed herein can be a method embedded in a computer program which can be implemented by a programmer using commercially available development tools.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/458,930, filed Jul. 20, 2006, currently pending, which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/676,545, filed Sep. 29, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,103,906, and both previous applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4287539 | Bixby | Sep 1981 | A |
4355415 | George et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4488179 | Krüger et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4602279 | Freeman | Jul 1986 | A |
4605964 | Chard | Aug 1986 | A |
4694490 | Harvey et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4704725 | Harvey et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4706121 | Young | Nov 1987 | A |
4718107 | Hayes | Jan 1988 | A |
4745549 | Hashimoto | May 1988 | A |
4751578 | Reiter et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4787063 | Muguet | Nov 1988 | A |
4847698 | Freeman | Jul 1989 | A |
4857999 | Welsh | Aug 1989 | A |
4908707 | Kinghorn | Mar 1990 | A |
4930158 | Vogel | May 1990 | A |
4959720 | Duffield et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4963994 | Levine | Oct 1990 | A |
4965825 | Harvey et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4977455 | Young | Dec 1990 | A |
5027400 | Baji et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5047867 | Strubbe et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5109279 | Ando | Apr 1992 | A |
5109414 | Harvey et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5134719 | Mankovitz | Jul 1992 | A |
5151789 | Young | Sep 1992 | A |
5155591 | Wachob | Oct 1992 | A |
5172413 | Bradley et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5200822 | Bronfin et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5223924 | Strubbe | Jun 1993 | A |
5231493 | Apitz | Jul 1993 | A |
5233654 | Harvey et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5249043 | Grandmougin | Sep 1993 | A |
5253066 | Vogel | Oct 1993 | A |
5291554 | Morales | Mar 1994 | A |
5299006 | Kim | Mar 1994 | A |
5317730 | Moore et al. | May 1994 | A |
5335277 | Harvey et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339434 | Rusis | Aug 1994 | A |
5341350 | Frank et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5346326 | Bienvenu | Sep 1994 | A |
5351075 | Herz et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5353121 | Young et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5355162 | Yazolino et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5355302 | Martin et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5357276 | Banker et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5400402 | Garfinkle | Mar 1995 | A |
5404567 | DePietro et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410343 | Coddington et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410344 | Graves et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412720 | Hoarty | May 1995 | A |
5426699 | Wunderlich et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5442389 | Blahut et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442390 | Hooper et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453779 | Dan et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5461415 | Wolf et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465385 | Ohqa et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477263 | O'Callaghan et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479266 | Young et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479268 | Young et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479302 | Haines | Dec 1995 | A |
5485197 | Hoarty | Jan 1996 | A |
5502504 | Marshall et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5506932 | Holmes et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5517254 | Monta et al. | May 1996 | A |
5517257 | Dunn et al. | May 1996 | A |
5521631 | Budow et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523794 | Mankovitz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5524195 | Clanton, III et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5524271 | Hollmann et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5528513 | Vaitzblit et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5532773 | Shaw et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537141 | Harper et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539449 | Blahut et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539880 | Lakhani | Jul 1996 | A |
5541638 | Story | Jul 1996 | A |
5541738 | Mankovitz | Jul 1996 | A |
5548338 | Ellis et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550576 | Klosterman | Aug 1996 | A |
5550825 | McMullan, Jr. et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5557338 | Maze et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557724 | Sampat et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558339 | Perlman | Sep 1996 | A |
5559548 | Davis et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559549 | Hendricks et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5568614 | Mendelson et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5583561 | Baker et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583563 | Wanderscheid et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585838 | Lawler et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585858 | Harper et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585866 | Miller et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586264 | Belknap et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589892 | Knee et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592551 | Lett et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594509 | Florin et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594779 | Goodman | Jan 1997 | A |
5600364 | Hendricks et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5602582 | Wanderscheid et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606642 | Stautner et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5610653 | Abecassis | Mar 1997 | A |
5616876 | Cluts | Apr 1997 | A |
5619247 | Russo | Apr 1997 | A |
5619249 | Billock et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5619274 | Roop et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623613 | Rowe et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625678 | Blomfield-Brown | Apr 1997 | A |
5629733 | Youman et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629867 | Goldman | May 1997 | A |
5629980 | Stefik et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630060 | Tang et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630067 | Kindell et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630119 | Aristides et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632007 | Freeman | May 1997 | A |
5635987 | Park et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640484 | Mankovitz | Jun 1997 | A |
5648824 | Dunn et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652613 | Lazarus et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654748 | Matthews, III | Aug 1997 | A |
5654886 | Zereski, Jr. et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5657072 | Aristides et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666645 | Thomas et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671277 | Ikenoue et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671377 | Bleidt et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675743 | Mavity | Oct 1997 | A |
5678041 | Baker et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682195 | Hendricks et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684525 | Klosterman | Nov 1997 | A |
5694163 | Harrison | Dec 1997 | A |
5696765 | Safadi | Dec 1997 | A |
5708845 | Wistendahl et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5708961 | Hylton et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710601 | Marshall et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5717452 | Janin et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721815 | Ottesen et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721829 | Dunn et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5727060 | Young | Mar 1998 | A |
5732216 | Logan et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734119 | France et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742443 | Tsao et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745710 | Clanton, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751282 | Girard et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751672 | Yankowski et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751883 | Ottesen | May 1998 | A |
5752159 | Faust et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752160 | Dunn | May 1998 | A |
5754771 | Epperson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758257 | Herz et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758258 | Shoff et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758259 | Lawler | May 1998 | A |
5760821 | Ellis et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761417 | Henley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761607 | Gudesen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768528 | Stumm | Jun 1998 | A |
5771354 | Crawford et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774170 | Hite et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778181 | Hidary et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5778182 | Cathey et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5778187 | Monteiro et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781226 | Sheehan | Jul 1998 | A |
5781227 | Goode et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781228 | Sposato | Jul 1998 | A |
5790198 | Roop et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790423 | Lau et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793366 | Mano et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793412 | Asamizuya | Aug 1998 | A |
5793971 | Fujita et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794217 | Allen | Aug 1998 | A |
5796952 | Davis et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798921 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802284 | Karlton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805154 | Brown | Sep 1998 | A |
5805763 | Lawler et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805804 | Laursen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805806 | McArthur | Sep 1998 | A |
5808608 | Young et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808694 | Usui et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809246 | Goldman | Sep 1998 | A |
5812123 | Rowe et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812205 | Milnes et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812763 | Teng | Sep 1998 | A |
5815146 | Youden et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815297 | Ciciora | Sep 1998 | A |
5818438 | Howe et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819019 | Nelson | Oct 1998 | A |
5819160 | Foladare et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822530 | Brown | Oct 1998 | A |
5828945 | Klosterman | Oct 1998 | A |
RE35954 | Levine | Nov 1998 | E |
5832287 | Atalla | Nov 1998 | A |
5835126 | Lewis | Nov 1998 | A |
5841979 | Schulhof et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844620 | Coleman et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850218 | LaJoie et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861906 | Dunn et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5872588 | Aras et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881245 | Thompson | Mar 1999 | A |
5883621 | Iwamura | Mar 1999 | A |
5884028 | Kindell et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884141 | Inoue et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886707 | Berg | Mar 1999 | A |
5886732 | Humpleman | Mar 1999 | A |
5887243 | Harvey et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892915 | Duso et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5894589 | Reber et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5896414 | Meyer et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898441 | Flurry | Apr 1999 | A |
5898456 | Wahl | Apr 1999 | A |
5899582 | DuLac | May 1999 | A |
5900904 | Okada et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903234 | Kimura | May 1999 | A |
5903263 | Emura | May 1999 | A |
5903264 | Moeller et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903723 | Beck et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905522 | Lawler | May 1999 | A |
5905847 | Kobayashi et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909638 | Allen | Jun 1999 | A |
5911046 | Amano | Jun 1999 | A |
5913039 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914941 | Janky | Jun 1999 | A |
5915090 | Joseph et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915094 | Kouloheris et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5916303 | Scott | Jun 1999 | A |
5917538 | Asamizuya | Jun 1999 | A |
5917835 | Barrett et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920702 | Bleidt et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5920800 | Schafer | Jul 1999 | A |
5922045 | Hanson | Jul 1999 | A |
5922048 | Emura | Jul 1999 | A |
5923361 | Sutton, Jr. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926204 | Mayer | Jul 1999 | A |
5926205 | Krause et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926624 | Katz et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928327 | Wang et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929849 | Kikinis | Jul 1999 | A |
5929850 | Broadwin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930473 | Teng et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930493 | Ottesen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931901 | Wolfe et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933603 | Vahalia et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933835 | Adams et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935206 | Dixon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936569 | Ståhle et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936673 | Agarwal | Aug 1999 | A |
5940071 | Treffers et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940073 | Klosterman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943046 | Cave et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943047 | Suzuki | Aug 1999 | A |
5945987 | Dunn | Aug 1999 | A |
5945988 | Williams et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947746 | Tsai | Sep 1999 | A |
5949411 | Doerr et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956482 | Agraharam et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956716 | Kenner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959659 | Dokic | Sep 1999 | A |
5961603 | Kunkel et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963202 | Polish | Oct 1999 | A |
5964455 | Catanzarite et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969283 | Looney et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969714 | Butcher | Oct 1999 | A |
5973680 | Ueda | Oct 1999 | A |
5973722 | Wakai et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974217 | Haraquchi | Oct 1999 | A |
5977963 | Gaughan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5977964 | Williams et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5978567 | Rebane et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5978843 | Wu et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986650 | Ellis et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990881 | Inoue et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999688 | Iggulden et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5999970 | Krisbergh et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002394 | Schein et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002720 | Yurt et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005564 | Ahmad et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005600 | Hill | Dec 1999 | A |
6008802 | Iki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009465 | Decker et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012089 | Hasegawa | Jan 2000 | A |
6012091 | Boyce | Jan 2000 | A |
6014184 | Knee et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014381 | Troxel et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014689 | Budge et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014693 | Ito et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014694 | Aharoni et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014706 | Cannon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018359 | Kemiode et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018612 | Thomason et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018765 | Durana et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020912 | De Lang | Feb 2000 | A |
6020930 | Legrand | Feb 2000 | A |
6022223 | Taniguchi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023725 | Ozawa et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025837 | Matthews, III et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025868 | Russo | Feb 2000 | A |
6028600 | Rosin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029045 | Picco et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029064 | Farris et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032202 | Lea et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038591 | Wolfe et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038614 | Chan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049823 | Hwang | Apr 2000 | A |
6049831 | Gardell et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052145 | Macrae et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061056 | Menard et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064380 | Swenson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6085236 | Lea | Jul 2000 | A |
6091823 | Hosomi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091883 | Artigalas et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098082 | Gibbon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108687 | Craig | Aug 2000 | A |
6111677 | Shintani et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112181 | Shear et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118450 | Proehl et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119144 | Fujita et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125230 | Yaginuma et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141003 | Chor | Oct 2000 | A |
6141488 | Knudson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147715 | Yuen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154203 | Yuen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154206 | Ludtke | Nov 2000 | A |
6160546 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160796 | Zou | Dec 2000 | A |
6163316 | Killian | Dec 2000 | A |
6166730 | Goode et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167188 | Young et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169725 | Gibbs et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6170006 | Namba | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172712 | Beard | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177931 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181867 | Kenner et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182094 | Humpleman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184878 | Alonso et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185621 | Romine | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208335 | Gordon et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208341 | van Ee et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219839 | Sampsell | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230200 | Forecast et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230325 | Iinuma et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232539 | Looney et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236395 | Sezan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237049 | Ludtke | May 2001 | B1 |
6243707 | Humpleman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243725 | Hempleman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243865 | Wei et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263503 | Margulis | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285685 | Bum | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289165 | Abecassis | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289346 | Milewski et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6311011 | Kuroda | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314575 | Billock et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324338 | Wood et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6349410 | Lortz | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353700 | Zhou | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356971 | Katz et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359661 | Nickum | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6388714 | Schein et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393430 | Van Ryzin | May 2002 | B1 |
6401242 | Eyer et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6433835 | Hartson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441832 | Tao et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449767 | Krapf et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456621 | Wada et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
RE37881 | Haines | Oct 2002 | E |
6466080 | Kawai et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6473559 | Knudson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480667 | O'Connor | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483986 | Krapf | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487145 | Berhan | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487362 | Yuen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496981 | Wistendahl et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498895 | Young et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6505348 | Knowles et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6526575 | McCoy et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6539548 | Hendricks et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6543053 | Li et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564378 | Satterfield et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577735 | Bharat | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578070 | Weaver et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594699 | Sahai et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6630954 | Okada | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647417 | Hunter et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654933 | Abbott et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657116 | Gunnerson | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6657702 | Chui et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671882 | Murphy et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678737 | Bucher | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6711622 | Fuller et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6741617 | Rosengren et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6745391 | Macrae et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6746127 | Suyama | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751402 | Elliott et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751802 | Huizer et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6756997 | Ward et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760758 | Lund et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6769127 | Bonomi et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6788882 | Geer et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6813775 | Finseth et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816175 | Hamp et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816904 | Ludwig et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820278 | Ellis | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826512 | Dara-Abrams et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837789 | Garahi et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6839769 | Needham et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6868225 | Brown et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6882793 | Fu et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6901603 | Zeidler et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6925246 | Behl | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6928468 | Leermakers | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6931593 | Grooters | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938101 | Hayes et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950624 | Kim et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6973474 | Hatayama | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6993788 | Lawrence et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7035804 | Saindon et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039643 | Sena et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7047377 | Elder et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058635 | Shah-Nazaroff et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7086077 | Giammaressi | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7098958 | Wredenhagen et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103906 | Katz et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7117519 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7120925 | D'Souza et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127735 | Lee | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7143432 | Brooks et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7159232 | Blackketter et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7159235 | Son et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7168086 | Carpenter et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7171677 | Ochiai | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7178161 | Fristoe et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7213071 | DeLima et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225336 | Zunke | May 2007 | B2 |
7231175 | Ellis | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7237253 | Blackkett er et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7240356 | Iki et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7242324 | Lai et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248778 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7260461 | Rao et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7263709 | Krapf | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7269733 | O'Toole, Jr. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7272298 | Lang et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7292774 | Masters et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7302697 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7305254 | Findikli | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7346920 | Lamkin et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7356246 | Kobb | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7356829 | Terakado et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7366199 | Vaughan et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7480721 | Shaheen | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7483964 | Jackson et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7533400 | Hailey et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7536704 | Pierre et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7574723 | Putterman et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7624337 | Sull et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624345 | Nishina et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7650621 | Thomas et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7684673 | Monroe | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689510 | Lamkin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7761892 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7787010 | DiFrancesco | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7793326 | McCoskey et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7840977 | Walker | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7877766 | Wu et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7917933 | Thomas et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7929551 | Dietrich | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7987492 | Liwerant et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8082568 | Ellis | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086575 | Putterman et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8295674 | Sasaki et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8528032 | Ellis et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8607287 | Walker | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8719090 | Lewis | May 2014 | B2 |
8732757 | Ward et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
20010004338 | Yankowski | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010007147 | Goldschmidt lki et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010026287 | Watanabe | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010033343 | Yap et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010039660 | Vasilevsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010042107 | Palm | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043700 | Shima et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020005792 | Satoh | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010652 | Deguchi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026639 | Haneda | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020042914 | Walker et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020043700 | Sasaki et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046315 | Miller et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020056087 | Berezowski et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059588 | Huber et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059621 | Thomas et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059642 | Russ et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069218 | Sull et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069746 | Taira et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020070982 | Hill et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078293 | Kou et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082901 | Dunning et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087588 | McBride et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020088011 | Lamkin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020104091 | Prabhu et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020113824 | Myers, Jr. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116533 | Holliman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120935 | Huber et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124254 | Kikinis | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161579 | Saindon et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166123 | Schrader et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174430 | Ellis et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174444 | Gatto et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020180803 | Kaplan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188735 | Needham et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194011 | Boies et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005446 | Jaff et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005454 | Rodriguez et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030035404 | Ozluturk et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037068 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046437 | Eytchison et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066084 | Kaars | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030066092 | Wagner | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030068154 | Zylka | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030105813 | Mizutani | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110499 | Knudson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135860 | Dureau | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149980 | Ellis | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149988 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149993 | Son et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030152096 | Chapman | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030162096 | Michot et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163832 | Tsuria et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030187984 | Banavar et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191623 | Salmonsen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194260 | Ward et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206710 | Ferman et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030214955 | Kim | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008972 | Haken | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040088731 | Putterman et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117831 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128686 | Boyer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139233 | Kellerman et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040156614 | Bumgardner et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181814 | Ellis et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184763 | DiFrancesco | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193648 | Lai et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040220091 | Adam et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226034 | Kaczowka et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237104 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040255326 | Hicks, III et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259537 | Ackley | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261040 | Radcliffe et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267965 | Vasudevan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050014531 | Findikli | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050028208 | Ellis | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039208 | Veeck et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046174 | Botes | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071876 | van Beek | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080497 | Rao | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102324 | Spring et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120373 | Thomas et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132264 | Joshi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138137 | Encarnacion et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138658 | Bryan | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050204388 | Knudson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204393 | Bopardikar et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227611 | Ellis | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246393 | Coates et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251827 | Ellis et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050254524 | An | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265395 | Kim et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004685 | Pyhalammi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015888 | Shih | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031883 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060037054 | McDowell et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041893 | Castro et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064728 | Son et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080707 | Laksono | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085835 | Istvan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060090186 | Santangelo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095942 | van Beek | May 2006 | A1 |
20060173838 | Garg et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060215650 | Wollmershauser et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060238648 | Wogsberg | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248570 | Witwer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253874 | Stark et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259949 | Schaefer et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271953 | Jacoby et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070011709 | Katz et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070022442 | Gil et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028267 | Ostojic et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032225 | Konicek et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055980 | Megeid et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070089160 | Ando | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094702 | Khare et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070113246 | Xiong | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124781 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070147351 | Dietrich et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070157234 | Walker | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070157240 | Walker | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070157241 | Walker | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070157242 | Cordray et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070157260 | Walker | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070157266 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070157281 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162661 | Fu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169149 | Jennings et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174774 | Lerman et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198659 | Lam | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070220024 | Putterman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220580 | Putterman | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070282969 | Dietrich et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070283046 | Dietrich et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080034396 | Lev | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080060001 | Logan et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080141303 | Walker et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155615 | Craner et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080189440 | Goyal et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080263227 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080307477 | Omernick | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090019492 | Grasset | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090138922 | Thomas et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100186034 | Walker | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110106901 | Wu | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131607 | Thomas | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110185392 | Walker | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120008917 | Katz et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011226 | Katz et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120131218 | Putterman et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20140040938 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2635571 | May 2009 | CA |
101707876 | May 2010 | CN |
2 256 115 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0 535 749 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0 572 090 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0 605 115 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0 624 039 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0 662 771 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0 682 452 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0 711 076 | May 1996 | EP |
0 725 539 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0753964 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0 758 833 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0 763 938 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0762756 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0 424 469 | May 1997 | EP |
0 862 833 | May 1997 | EP |
0 836 321 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0 854 645 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0 673 160 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0 874 524 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0 924 927 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0 932 275 | Jul 1999 | EP |
0 944 253 | Sep 1999 | EP |
0 944 257 | Sep 1999 | EP |
0940985 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1 099 341 | Jan 2000 | EP |
0 986 046 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0 821 856 | Jun 2001 | EP |
0 806 111 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1 213 919 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1217787 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1217787 | Jun 2002 | EP |
0 969 662 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1 237 372 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1377049 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1 244 300 | Jan 2005 | EP |
0 880 856 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1 687 951 | May 2005 | EP |
0 757 873 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1427148 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1 763 234 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1 613 066 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1796393 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1 327 209 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2174484 | Apr 2010 | EP |
2 256 115 | Nov 1992 | GB |
60061935 | Sep 1985 | JP |
06111413 | Apr 1994 | JP |
06303541 | Oct 1994 | JP |
07-336318 | Dec 1995 | JP |
08-317331 | Nov 1996 | JP |
09 138804 | May 1997 | JP |
09-182035 | Jul 1997 | JP |
09-214873 | Aug 1997 | JP |
10 065978 | Mar 1998 | JP |
11 032272 | Feb 1999 | JP |
09-321793 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11-177962 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11 205711 | Jul 1999 | JP |
H11-177962 | Jul 1999 | JP |
H11-341040 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000-004272 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000-113176 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001-204001 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002-063385 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-176610 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2003-162444 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003-209893 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-250142 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-080083 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2005-117236 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-295296 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006-088052 | Mar 2006 | JP |
1999-0086454 | Dec 1999 | KR |
2000-0059522 | Oct 2000 | KR |
1020000030530 | Dec 2001 | KR |
1020000050028 | Mar 2002 | KR |
1019990044886 | Apr 2002 | KR |
247388 | Oct 1994 | TW |
WO 8804507 | Jun 1988 | WO |
WO 8912370 | Dec 1989 | WO |
WO 9000847 | Jan 1990 | WO |
WO 9100670 | Jan 1991 | WO |
WO 9107050 | May 1991 | WO |
WO 9204801 | Mar 1992 | WO |
WO-9222983 | Dec 1992 | WO |
WO 9308542 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9322877 | Nov 1993 | WO |
WO 9501058 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9504431 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9515658 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9531069 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9532583 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9532584 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9532585 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9532587 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9609721 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9617467 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9625821 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9631980 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9633572 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9634467 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9634491 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9641472 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9641478 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9713368 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO-9719555 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9721291 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9732434 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9734413 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9734414 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9737500 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9742763 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9746016 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9746943 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9747124 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9748228 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9749237 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9801995 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9807277 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9810589 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9812872 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9817033 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9817064 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9818260 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9819459 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9826528 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9826584 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9826596 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9831115 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9831116 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9834405 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9838831 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9847279 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9847283 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9848566 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9903267 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9904561 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9911060 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9912320 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9914945 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9927681 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9928897 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9935753 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9939466 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9956473 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 9960790 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 9964969 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 9965244 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 9966725 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0004706 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO-0004707 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO-0004709 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0005885 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0011869 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0016548 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0017738 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0030345 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0033208 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0033560 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0033565 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO-0034891 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0057280 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0058967 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0059230 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO0074383 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0101677 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0101689 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0110126 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0135662 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0147248 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0150743 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0167772 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 03043326 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03046727 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 2004032511 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004061699 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2005046174 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2007078503 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2009009106 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Telecommunications Information Networking Architecture Consortium “TINA-C Deliverable” Service Architecture, Version 5.0, Jun. 16, 1997 (167 pgs.). |
C.S. Hong, et al. “A Networking Architecture for Mobility Services Using Mobile Agent Approach” Proceedings of the TINA '97—Global Convergence of Telecommunications and Distributed Object Computing 0-8186-8335-x/97, 1997 IEEE, (11 pgs). |
A. Limongiello, et al. “An Experimental Open Architecture to Support Multimedia Services based on CORBA, Java and WWW Technologies, TELECOM Italia Headquarters” (undated) pp. 69-75. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/332,244, filed Jun. 11, 1999, Ellis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/330,860, filed Jun. 11, 1999, Ellis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/354,344, filed Jul. 16, 1999, Ellis. |
Jaidev, “XSLT—A Wired and Wireless Case Study,” http://csharpcomputing.com/ XMLTutorial/Lesson15.htm. |
Randerson, J., “Let Software Catch the Game for You,” New Scientist, Jul. 3, 2004. |
Papers Delivered (Part 1), 61st National Conference, Information Processing Society of Japan, Oct. 3-5, 2000. |
Pogue, D., “State of the Art: For TiVo and Replay, New Reach,” N.Y. Times, May 29, 2003. |
CableData brochure, “A New Approach to Addressability” (undated). |
“Addressable Converters: A New Development at CableData,” Via Cable, vol. 1, No. 12 (Dec. 1981). |
Hofmann, et al., “Videotext Programmiert Videorecorder,” Rundfunktechnische Mitteilungen, Nov.-Dec. 1982, pp. 254-257 (translation abstract attached). |
Sorce, J. et al., “Designing a Broadband Residential Entertainment Service: A Case Study,” 13th International Symposium Human Factors in Telecommunications, Torino, Italy, Sep. 10-14, 1990 pp. 141-148. |
Brugliera, V. “Digital On-Screen Display—A New Technology for the Consumer Interface,” Symposium Record Cable Sessions, 18th International Television Symposium and Technical Exhibition, Montreux, Switzerland Jun. 10-15, 1993, pp. 571-586 (Jun. 11, 1993). |
Miller, M. D. “A Scenario for the Deployment of Interactive Multimedia Cable Television Systems in the United States in the 1990's,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 585-589 (Apr. 1994). |
Chang, Y., et al., “An Open-Systems Approach to Video on Demand,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 32, No. 5 pp. 68-80 (May 1994). |
“Electronic Programme Guide (EPG); Protocol for a TV Guide using electronic data transmission” by European Telecommunication Standards Institute, May 1997, Valbonne, France, publication No. ETS 300 707. |
Article: “Windows 98 Feature Combines TV, Terminal and the Internet”, New York Times, Aug. 18, 1998. |
The New York Times Website Article, “2 Makers Plan Introductions of Digital VCR”, by John Markoff, Mar. 29, 1999. |
David M. Rudnick, U.S. Appl. No. 09/283,681, filed Apr. 1, 1999, entitled Interactive Television Program Guide System Having Graphic Arrangements of Program Event Regions. |
“Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); DVB specification for data broadcasting”, European Telecommunications Standards Institute, Draft EN 301 192 V1.2.1 (Jan. 1999). |
Li et al., “Distributed Multimedia Systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE vol. 85 No. 7: pp. 1063-1108 (Jul. 1997). |
S. Gondow, et al., “The Architecture of Communication Migration and Media State Management for Distributed Applications on Wearable Networks,” Information Processing Society of Japan (National Conference Lecture Collected Paper), Tokyo, Japan, Oct. 3, 2000, pp. 1-2. |
F. Teraoka et al., “Host Migration Transparancy in IP networks: The VIP Approach” ACM SIGCOMM—Computer Communication Review, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, Jan. 1993, pp. 45-65. |
A. C. Snoeren et al., “An End-to-End Approach to Host Mobility” 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM 2000), Boston, MA, USA, Aug. 2000, pp. 1-12. |
Dimitrova, et al. “Personalizing Video Recorders ing Multimedia Processing and Integration.” ACM 2001. |
Haas et al., Proceedings of ICIP 2002 Personalized News Through Content Augmentation and Profiling:, Rochester, NY, Sep. 2002. |
“Rewind, reply and unwind with new high-tech TV devices,” by Lawrence J. Magid, LA Times (This document was printed from the internet on Jun. 6, 1999 and bears a date of May 19, 1999). |
Pham et al,, “Exploiting Location-Based Composite Devices to Support and Facilitate Situated Ubiquitous Computing,” HUC 2000, LNCS 1927, pp. 143-156. |
Arango et al., “The Touring Machine System,” Communications of the ACM, Jan. 1993, vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 68-77. |
Fortino et al., A Cooperative Playback System for On-Demand Multimedia Sessions over Internet, 2000 IEEE, pp. 41-44. |
Han et al., “Dynamic Adaptation in an Image Transcoding Proxy for Mobile Web Browsing,” IEEE Personal Communications, Dec. 1998, pp. 8-17. |
Mah et al., “Providing Network Video Service to Mobile Clients,” 1993 IEEE, pp. 48-54. |
IBM Corporation “IBM Content Manager VideoCharger, New dimensions for enterprise content, DB2 Data Management Software” pp. 1-4, Mar. 2002. |
IBM Corporation IBM VideoCharger for AIX Version 2.0 “Streaming the power of video to your desktop, pp. 1-5” Visit the IBM VideoCharger Website at: www.software.ibm.com/data/videocharger/. |
IBM Corporation “IBM Content Manager VideoCharger, Version 8, New dimensions for enterprise content, DB2 Data Management Software, pp. 1-4,” May 2002, Visit IBM Web site at ibm.com/software/data/videocharger. |
IBM Corporation, “IBM Video Charger Server”, pp. 102, Jun. 1998. |
Inouye et al., “System Support for Mobile Multimedia Applications”, Proc. of the 7th Intl. Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video, 1997, pp. 143-154. |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, “Commission Opinion” Dec. 11, 2013 (27 pages). |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, Complainants' Initial Submission in Response to Commission's Determination to Review the Final Initial Determination Aug. 23, 2013 (55 pages). |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, “Complainants' Reply Submission in Response to Commission's Determination to Review the Final Initial Determination” Aug. 30, 2013 (32 pages). |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, “Notice of Commission Determination to Review in Its Entirety A Final Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337” Aug. 9, 2013 (6 pages). |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, “Notice of the Commission's Final Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337; Termination of the Investigation” Nov. 1, 2013 (4 pages). |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, “Respondent Netflix Response to Complainants' Petition for Review” Jul. 12, 2013 (64 pages). |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, “Respondent Netflix, Inc.'s Summary of Issues for Its Response to Complainants Petition for Review” Jul. 12, 2013 (6 pages). |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, “Respondents Netflix, Inc.'s and Roku, Inc.'s Response to Complainants' Initial Submission in Response to Commission's Determination to Review the Final Initial Determination” Aug. 30, 2013 (43 pages). |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, “Respondents' Response to the Commission's Determination to Review the Final Initial Determination” Aug. 26, 2013 (62 pages). |
Sandsta et al., “Design and Implementation of the Elvira Video Server,” Norwegian Computer Science Conference NIK'96 (Norsk Informatikkonferanse), 1996, pp. 259-270. |
Singru et al., “Framework for Interactive Video-On-Demand Service”, Proc. of the IEEE 14th Annual Intl. Phoenix Conf. on Computer and Communications, 1995, pp. 636-642. |
Smith et al., “Transcoding Internet Content for Heterogeneous Client Devices”, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Circuits and Syst. (ISCAS), May 1998, pp. 599-602. |
Smith, John R., “Digital Video Libraries and the Internet”, IEEE Communications Magazine, 1999, vol. 37, pp. 92-97. |
Zahariadis et al., “Interactive Multimedia Services to Residential Users,” IEEE Communications Magazine, 1997, vol. 35, pp. 61-68. |
“Don Imus: The Thinking Man's Shock Jock”, Broadcasting Cable, Jun. 13, 1994, pp. 49-52. |
“TV Listing Star on the Computer”, Central Penn Business Journal/HighBeam Research, pp. 1-4, Mar. 15, 1996. |
Abarca, C. et al., Telecommunications Information Networking Architecture Consortium, Service Architecture, Version 5.0, Jun. 16, 1997, 168 pages. |
Bestler, C. et al., “Flexible Data Structures and Interface Rituals for Rapid Development of OSD Applications”, published NCTA Technical Papers, pp. 223-236, 1993. |
Cable Data: Via Cable, vol. 1, No. 12, Addressable Converters: A New Development at CableData, 11 pages, Dec. 1981. |
Chawathe, Y., et al., “A Proxy Architecture for Reliable Multicast in Heterogeneous Environments”, ACM Multimedia '98, Bristol, UK, pp. 151-159, 1998. |
DAVIC 1.3.1 Specification Part 1, Published in 1998 by Digital Audio-Visual Counsel (86 pages). |
Davis, B., “Violence on Television”, TV Guide on Screen to the US House of Representatives Committee of Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Telecommunications and Finance, pp. 93-163, Jun. 25, 1993. |
December, J., “Understanding the Potential of Java and the Web”, Presenting Java, published Sep. 20, 1995. |
Dias, D. “A Scalable and Highly Available Web Server”, IEEE, Proceedings of COMPCON '96, p. 85-92, 1996. |
Federighi, C. et al. “A Distributed Hierarchical Storage Manager for a Video-on-Demand System”, Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases II, IS&T/SPIE, Symp. on Elec. Imaging Sci. & Tech., San Jose, CA, pp. 1-13, Feb. 1994. |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, “Complainants' Opposition to Respondents' Contingent Petition for Review of Final Initial Determination” Jul. 2, 2013 (51 pages). |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, “Final Initial Determination” Jun. 7, 2013 (375 pages) Parts 1 and 2. |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, “Open Session Transcript” Mar. 5, 2013 (642 pages) Parts 1 and 2. |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, “Respondents' Notice of Prior Art” Oct. 12, 2012 (39 pages). |
Rovi et al. v. Hulu, LLC, Central District of California Case No. 12-cv-04756, “Order Denying Hulu's Motion for Summary Judgment That the '906 Patent is Invalid,” Feb. 5, 2013 (43 pages). |
Rovi et al. v. Hulu, LLC, Central District of California Case No. 12-cv-04756, “Plaintiffs' Opposition to Hulu's Motion for Summary Judgment that the '906 Patent is Invalid” Dec. 17, 2012 (19 pages). |
Rovi et al. v. Hulu, LLC, Central District of California Case No. 12-cv-04756, “Plaintiffs' Statement of Genuine Issues in Support of Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant Hulu LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment that the '906 Patent is Invalid” Dec. 17, 2012 (36 pages). |
Rovi et al. v. Hulu, LLC, Central District of California Case No. 12-cv-04756, “Reporter's Transcript of Motion Hearing Jan. 7, 2013” Jan. 16, 2013 (95 pages). |
Rowe, L., et al., A Continuous Media Player, Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Network and OS Support for Digital Audio and Video (Nov. 1992). |
Schroeder, T. et al. “Scalable Web Server Clustering Technologies”, University of Nebraska-Lincoln CSE Journal Articles, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, pp. 38-45, Jun. 1, 2000. |
Uniden UST-4800 Integrated Receiver/Descrambler, Installation Guide, Installation Device, copyright 1990, Uniden America Corporation, 60 pages. |
Uniden UST-4800 Integrated Receiver/Descrambler, Operating Guide, copyright 1990, Uniden America Corporation, 24 pages. |
Uniden UST-4800 Super Integrated Receiver/Descrambler, Preliminary Reference Manual, 80 pages, Nov. 12, 1991. |
Verma, D., “Content Distribution Networks—An Engineering Approach”, p. 24-49, 2002. |
Wedlund, Elin and Henning Schulzrinne, Mobility Support using SIP, § 4, ACM. |
Zou, “Mobile ID Protocol: A Badge-Activated Application Level Handoff of a Multimedia Streaming to Support User Mobility,” Aug. 2000. |
“Introducing VideoShare.com; Consumers and Small Businesses Can Now Create and Add Video to All Web-Based Communications”. Business Wire, Mar. 8, 2000. Complete text, (Abstract). Gale Group PROMT [online]. USA. [Recovered on Mar. 23, 2015]. Recovered from: ProQuest LLC. |
“Play Time”—21st Century Home—Part 2, PC Computing Dec. 1999 (4 pages). |
Realplayer 8 Plus User Manual, Rev. 1, Real Networks, Inc. p. 32 (2000). |
Brody, Information highway: The home front, Technology Review, vol. 96:6 (Aug./Sep. 1993), p. 30 (7 pages). |
Brown, “Supporting user mobility”, pp. 69-77, 1996 (9 pages). |
Business Wire, Gemstar Adopts Shareholder Rights Plan and Amendments to Articles and Memorandum of Association, Jul. 12, 1998, (2 pages). |
Bwanausi, ‘Daily News’ Xones Into New Editions, Adweek Western Edition, Sep. 17, 1990, p. 12. |
Cherrick et al., Individually addressable receiver with interactive channel guide display, VCR, and cable box control, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 40:3 (1994), pp. 317-328. |
Costello, On-screen TV program guides, Stereo Review, 60:8 (Aug. 1995), p. 20. |
CV prof Klara Nahrstedt, https://wiki.engr.illinois.edu/display/monet/Klara+Nahrstedt, 2014, (2 pages)x. |
Decision of the Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.05, Feb. 2, 2012 (10 pages). |
Declaration of David King, executed Mar. 21, 2013 (11 pages). |
Email Bo Zou, Jan. 6, 2012 (1 page). |
Email Hong dated Nov. 1, 2012 (2 pages). |
Email Klara Nahrstedt, Jan. 20, 2012 (1 page). |
Email Roy Campbell, Jan. 18, 2012 (1 page). |
Email Wojtowicz dated Nov. 12, 2012 (2 pages). |
EP 99963412.4 Official Communication dated Mar. 6, 2007 (80 pages). |
EP 99963412.4 Official Communication dated Oct. 21, 2010 (8 pages). |
Fall, A Peer-to-Peer I/O System in Support of I/O Intensive Workloads, PhD Dissertatioon, University of California, San Diego (1994). |
Fox, A., et al., Adapting to Network and Client Variation Using Infrastructural Proxies: Lessons and Perspectives, Personal Communications IEEE, pp. 10-19 (Aug. 1998) (15 pages). |
Gemstar, Gemstar Buys VideoGuide Stake, Consumer Electronics, Feb. 26, 1996, p. 11. |
Goncalves et al. “Video-On-Demand Provision Using TINA”, 2000 (6 pages). |
Hodge et al., Video on demand: architecture, systems, and applications, Selected Papers from the SMPTE Advanced Television and Electronic Imaging Conference, Feb. 4, 1994, pp. 120-132. |
Huyng “Implementations of User Mobility Support for UPC in JAVA/CORBA Environment,” The University of British Columbia, Aug. 1999 (86 pages). |
Isobe at al., Interactivity in broadcasting and its application Pto ISDB service, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. 42:3 (Sep. 1996), pp. 179-185. |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, “Complainants' Petition for Review of Final Initial Determination” Jun. 24, 2013 (55 pages). |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, “Order Denying Summary Determination Motions” Mar. 4, 2013 (6 pages). |
ITC Investigation of Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology, Investigation No. 337-TA-845, “Respondents Netflix, Inc. and Roku, Inc.s Contingent Petition for Review” Jun. 24, 2013 (53 pages). |
Letter from Delphine Kranz, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, dated Feb. 6, 2012 (1 page). |
Li et al., Vision: a digital library, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, Mar. 20-23, 1996, pp. 19-27. |
McNab et al., A distributed digital library architecture incorporating different index styles, IEEE International Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries, Apr. 22-24, 1998, pp. 36-45. |
Mobile Agent Approach, Global Convergence of Telecommunications and Distributed Object Computing, pp. 297-307 (1997), Section 8.4: X. |
MONET: Multimedia Operating System and Networking Group http://cairo.cs.uiuc.edu/publications/view.php?action=list&area=all&type=master, Sep. 21, 2011 (5 pages). |
Moss, 500 Channels Awe Advertisers, Multichannel News (Apr. 19, 1993), p. 1A. |
Nahrstedt and Feng, “Multimedia Computing and Networking 2000”, pp. 196-203 (Jan. 24-26, 2000) (9 pages). |
Netflix, Inc. v. Rovi Corporation et al., Netflix's Joint Claim Cosntruction and Prehearing Statement Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 4-3, dated Dec. 19, 2014, 23 pages. |
Netflix, Inc. v. Rovi Corporation et al., Netflix's Responsive Claim Construction Brief, dated Feb. 18, 2015, 30 pages. |
Netflix, Inc. v. Rovi Corporation et al., Redacted Version of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. § 101, dated Dec. 15, 2014, 30 pages. |
Netflix, Inc. v. Rovi Corporation et al., Rovi's Opening Claim Construction Brief Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 4-5, dated Jan. 30, 2015, 30 pages. |
Netflix, Inc. v. Rovi Corporation et al., Rovi's Opposition to Netflix's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.c. § 101, dated Jan. 30, 2015, 33 pages. |
Netflix, Inc. v. Rovi Corporation et al., Rovi's Reply Claim Construction Brief Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 4-5, dated Mar. 2, 2015, 22 pages. |
Newsbyte, StarSight telecase offers interactive TV product, Jun. 2, 1995 (2 pages). |
Nichols, On-screen guide to TV schedules can program a VCR, Too, Times Topics, New York Times Company, Jun. 26, 1995. |
Pohlman, House Calls, Video Magazine, vol. 20:6 (Oct. 1996), pp. 25-27. |
PR Newswire, NextLevel Systems, Inc. and nCUBE demonstrate their integrated near-video-on-demand solution on NextLevel's advanced analog CFT 2200 platform, Dec. 10, 1997. |
Premium Channels Publishing Company Inc., Premium channels publishing will market a weekly program guide listing pay TV, cable and broadcast offerings by daypart, Cable Television Business, Nov. 15, 1982, p. 194. |
Reed “Room to room video”, Popular Science, May 1991, pp. 96-98 (3 pages). |
Rovi et al. v. Hulu, LLC, Central District of California Case No. 12-cv-04756, “Defendant Hulu's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Hulu's Motion for Summary Judgment That The '906 Patent is Invalid” Dec. 3, 2012 (32 pages). |
Rovi et al. v. Hulu, LLC, Central District of California Case No. 12-cv-04756, “Defendant Hulu's Reply Memorandum in Support of Hulu's Motion for Summary Judgment That the '906 Patent is Invalid” Dec. 26, 2012 (32 pages). |
S. Draper et al., TV Anytime, Proceedings International Broadcasting Convention, 1999, pp. 103-108. |
Schmidt “Supporting Ubiquitous Computing with Stateless Consoles and Computation Caches” Aug. 2000 (140 pages). |
Scully, Digital librarian could prove PPV boon, Broadcasting & Cable, Jun. 7, 1993, p. 97. |
Scully, For some, interactive future is now, Broadcast & Cable, Jun. 1993, pp. 77-78. |
Tedesco, Thomson to produce RCA NC box for NetChannel, Broadcasting & Cable, 127:30, p. 100 (2 page). |
Tedesco, TV-'Net vendors resist the marketing Web, Broadcasting & Cable, 127:21 (May 19, 1997), p. 55. |
Time Warner Signs Tulsa Firm to Provide Cable Program Guide, Journal Record, May 25, 1994 (2 pages). |
TINA-C, Business Model and Reference Points, Version 4.0, May 22, 1997 (68 pages). |
Tsao et al., “An Efficient storage server in near video-on-demand systems,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 44(1):27-32 (Feb. 1998). |
Tsao et al., A Novel Data Placement Scheme on Optical Discs for Near-VOD Servers, Interactive Distributed Multimedia Systems and Telecommunications Services Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1309 (1997), pp. 133-142. |
United Kingdom: BSKyB to launch integrated personal TV recorder, BBC Monitoring Media, Sep. 11, 2000. (3 pages). |
United Media Enterprises, United Media Enterprises (New York, NY) affiliate ‘TV Watch/DIP’ now provides a monthly satellite print guide with schedules for all satellite and pay services, Satellite News, Dec. 24, 1980, p. 7 (1 page). |
Using Smart Cards With the Sun Ray Enterprize Appliance, Sun Microsystems, Sep. 1999, (19 pages). |
“Concurrent Systems,” 2nd Edition, Jean Bacon, Addison Wesley Longman Ltd. 1988. |
“Controlling Propagation Operations using Atrributes on Relaations.” 3rd Annual Conference on Object-oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA 88). San Diego, California, USA. Sep. 25-30, 1988. |
Netflix, Inc. v. Rovi Corporation et al., Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment, dated Jul. 15, 2015 (35 pages). |
Netflix, Inc. v. Rovi Corporation et al., Claim Construction Order dated Jul. 15, 2015, 20 pages. |
Netflix, Inc. v. Rovi Corporation et al., Brief of Appellants Rovi Corporation et al., Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:11-cv-6591-PJH, dated Dec. 14, 2015 (71 pages). |
Fox et al., “Adapting to Network and Client Variation Using Infrastructural Proxies: Lessons and Perspectives,” pp. 10-19, IEEE Personal Communications, Aug. 1998. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120008917 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09676545 | Sep 2000 | US |
Child | 11458930 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11458930 | Jul 2006 | US |
Child | 13181915 | US |