The present disclosure relates in general to user interface design, and in particular to user interface controls that facilitate the specification of data hierarchies.
Many data sets that are represented in a “flat” (i.e., non-hierarchical) format can be reorganized in a hierarchical manner. For example, consider a table of employee salary data, where each row in the table includes values for attributes “employee name,” “employee salary,” “manager name,” “department,” and “organization.” In this table, various rows having distinct values for “employee name” can share a common value for “manager name.” Further, various rows having distinct values for “employee name” can share a common value for “department.” Yet further, various rows having distinct values for “department” can share a common value for “organization.” Thus, although the table is a flat list of records, the salary data in the table can be reorganized (e.g., summarized) hierarchically with respect to an ordered sequence of attributes (e.g., organization>department>manager name). This ordered sequence of attributes is referred to herein as a “data hierarchy.”
There are a number of software applications that allow users to specify a data hierarchy for a data set for the purpose of visualizing the data set according to the hierarchy. For example, Microsoft Excel (developed by Microsoft Corporation) provides tools known as pivot tables and pivot charts. Using these tools, a user can specify a data hierarchy for a spreadsheet table by dragging and dropping column headers of the table to various locations. The data in the table is then displayed (e.g., via another table or via a chart) according to the specified data hierarchy.
Although the drag-and-drop functionality described above can be a convenient mechanism for specifying a data hierarchy, it is also associated with several well-known usability issues. For example, there are difficulties informing users that the drag-and-drop functionality exists, difficulties informing users of what can be dragged and where the draggable objects can be dropped, difficulties informing users of drop-related errors, and difficulties providing accessible alternatives to drag-and-drop for users that cannot use a mouse (or other types of pointing devices required to perform drag-and-drop operations). Further, implementing drag-and-drop functionality in an application can be difficult from a development perspective since it typically requires more complex coding than other types of user interface interactions.
Embodiments of the present invention provide user interface (UI) controls that facilitate the specification of data hierarchies. In one set of embodiments, a first UI control component can be provided that comprises an ordered group of drop-down menus. Each drop-down menu in the ordered group can be populated with a selectable list of attributes from a data set and can be associated with a level in a data hierarchy. By selecting values (e.g., data set attributes) using the various drop-down menus, a user can interactively specify a data hierarchy for the data set. The data set can then be visualized according to the specified data hierarchy. In further embodiments, a second UI control component, such as a slider bar, can be provided in addition to the first UI control component. The second UI control component can allow a user to interactively enable or disable certain drop-down menus in the ordered group, thereby acting as a “depth filter” for controlling the depth of the data hierarchy.
Certain embodiments of the present invention can provide a number of benefits over existing user interface mechanisms for specifying data hierarchies (such as the drag-and-drop functionality in Microsoft Excel). For example, drop-down menus are generally familiar to users and clearly indicate what selection options are available. As a result, users can easily understand which attributes of a data set can be selected for a given level of a data hierarchy. Further, by only loading the drop-down menus with valid selection options, certain embodiments of the present invention can prevent users from specifying invalid data hierarchies. Yet further, drop-down menu interactions can be invoked using a variety of different input devices, including keyboards. Accordingly, these types of interactions can be more accessible than drag-and-drop interactions (which require the use of a mouse or other pointing device).
In certain embodiments, the first UI control component (e.g., the ordered group of drop-down menus) can be combined with the second UI control component (e.g., the slider bar) into a single component, Alternatively, the two control components can be positioned such that they are located adjacent to each other in a user interface. In these embodiments, users can conveniently modify both the level and depth aspects of a data hierarchy from a central location. In addition, the current settings for both of these aspects can be viewed by looking at a single part of the user interface.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a method for facilitating user specification of a data hierarchy is provided. The method comprises receiving, at a computer system, a data set including a plurality of rows, each row including values for a plurality of attributes, and generating, by the computer system, a user interface. The user interface includes a first control component comprising an ordered group of drop-down menus, where each drop-down menu is populated with a selectable list of attributes from the plurality of attributes and is operable to select a particular attribute as a level in a data hierarchy.
In one embodiment, the method above further comprises receiving, from a user, a selection change for a first drop-down menu in the ordered group of drop-down menus, and updating, based on the selection change, the selectable list of attributes for a second drop-down menu following the first drop-down menu in the ordered group.
In one embodiment, the updating comprises determining, based on the selection change, an attribute in the selectable list of attributes for the second drop-down menu that results in an invalid data hierarchy for the data set, and deleting the attribute from the selectable list of attributes for the second drop-down menu.
In one embodiment, each drop-down menu in the ordered group of drop-down menus is configured to display its current selection.
In one embodiment, the user interface further includes a second control component operable to disable one or more drop-down menus in the ordered group of drop-down menus, thereby disabling one or more levels in the data hierarchy.
In one embodiment, the second control component is operable to disable a first drop-down menu in the ordered group of drop-down menus only if all drop-down menus following the first drop-down menu in the ordered group have been disabled.
In one embodiment, the ordered group of drop-down menus are arranged in a row, and the second control component is a slider bar that spans the length of the row.
In one embodiment, disabling a drop-down menu comprises preventing a user from operating the drop-down menu to change its selection.
In one embodiment, the second control component is located adjacent to the first control component in the user interface.
In one embodiment, the user interface further includes a visualization component comprising a visualization of the data set according to the data hierarchy. The visualization of the data set can be a treemap, a clustered bar graph, a stacked bar graph, a hierarchical table, and/or the like.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a machine-readable storage medium having stored thereon program code executable by a computer system is provided. The program code includes code that causes the computer system to receive a data set including a plurality of rows, each row including values for a plurality of attributes, and code that causes the computer system to generate a user interface. The user interface includes a first user control component comprising an ordered group of drop-down menus, where each drop-down menu is populated with a selectable list of attributes from the plurality of attributes and is operable to select a particular attribute as a level in a data hierarchy.
According to yet another embodiment of the present invention, a system for facilitating user specification of a data hierarchy is provided. The system comprises a storage component configured to store a data set including a plurality of rows, each row including values for a plurality of attributes, and a processing component in communication with the storage component. The processing component is configured to generate a user interface including a first user control component comprising an ordered group of drop-down menus, each drop-down menu being populated with a selectable list of attributes from the plurality of attributes and being operable to select a particular attribute as a level in a data hierarchy.
A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the embodiments disclosed herein can be realized by reference to the remaining portions of the specification and the attached drawings.
In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous details are set forth in order to provide an understanding of embodiments of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that certain embodiments can be practiced without some of these details.
Embodiments of the present invention provide user interface (UI) controls that facilitate the specification of data hierarchies. In one set of embodiments, a first UI control component can be provided that comprises an ordered group of drop-down menus. Each drop-down menu in the ordered group can be populated with a selectable list of attributes from a data set and can be associated with a level in a data hierarchy. By selecting values (e.g., data set attributes) for the various drop-down menus, a user can interactively specify a data hierarchy for the data set. The data set can then be visualized according to the specified data hierarchy. In further embodiments, a second UI control component, such as a slider bar, can be provided in addition to the first UI control component. The second UI control component can allow a user to interactively enable or disable certain drop-down menus in the ordered group, thereby acting as a “depth filter” for controlling the depth of the data hierarchy.
Certain embodiments of the present invention can provide a number of benefits over existing user interface mechanisms for specifying data hierarchies (such as the drag-and-drop functionality in Microsoft Excel). For example, drop-down menus are generally familiar to users and clearly indicate what selection options are available. As a result, users can easily understand which attributes of a data set can be selected for a given level of a data hierarchy. Further, by only loading the drop-down menus with valid selection options, certain embodiments of the present invention can prevent users from specifying invalid data hierarchies. Yet further, drop-down menu interactions can be invoked using a variety of different input devices, including keyboards. Accordingly, these types of interactions can be more accessible than drag-and-drop interactions (which require the use of a mouse or other pointing device).
In certain embodiments, the first UI control component (e.g., the ordered group of drop-down menus) can be combined with the second UI control component (e.g., the slider bar) into a single component, Alternatively, the two components can be positioned such that they are located adjacent to each other in a user interface. In these embodiments, users can conveniently modify both the level and depth aspects of a data hierarchy from a central location. In addition, the current settings for both of these aspects can be viewed by looking at a single part of the user interface.
At block 102, a data set can be received at a computer system, where the data set includes values for a plurality of attributes. In one set of embodiments, the data set can be received from a database and can correspond to data stored in one or more relational database tables. In alternative embodiments, the data can be received from other types of data sources. An example data set is described with respect to
At block 104, a user interface can be generated by the computer system for visualizing the data set according to a user-specified data hierarchy. In one set of embodiments, the user interface can include a UI control component comprising an ordered group of drop-down menus. As used herein, a drop-down menu (also known as a “poplist,” “picklist,” or “drop-down list”) is a user interface element comprising a list of selectable options, a field for displaying the currently selected option, and a control (e.g., button) for displaying the list below the field. In the context of HTML-based user interfaces, a drop-down menu can be defined using the “<select>” and “<option>” HTML tags.
In various embodiments, each drop-down menu in the ordered group can be populated with a selectable list of attributes from the data set received at block 102. For example, if the data set includes the attributes “employee name,” “employee salary,” “manager name,” “department,” and “organization,” the list of selectable options for each drop-down menu can be populated with one or more of these particular attributes. Further, each drop-down menu can be associated with a level in a data hierarchy. For instance, if the ordered group includes three drop-down menus, the first drop-down menu can be associated with a first level in a data hierarchy, the second drop-down menu can be associated with a second level in the data hierarchy, and the third drop-down menu can be associated with a third level in the data hierarchy. Thus, by selecting values using the drop-down menus, a user can specify a sequence of attributes corresponding to a data hierarchy for the data set.
In certain embodiments, the user interface generated at block 104 can also include a visualization component. The visualization component can display a visualization of the data set received at block 102 in accordance with the data hierarchy specified via the UI control component (i.e., the ordered group of drop-down menus). The visualization can be any type of hierarchical visualization as known in the art, such as a treemap visualization, a clustered back graph visualization, a stacked bar graph visualization, a hierarchical table visualization, a multiple pie chart visualization, and or the like.
Once the user interface has been generated, it can be displayed to a user (block 106). In one set of embodiments, the user interface can be displayed with a default data hierarchy. In other words, the drop-down menus in the ordered group can be initialized with default attribute selections. In these embodiments, the visualization component can display a visualization of the data set according to the default data hierarchy. In other embodiments, the user interface can be displayed without a default data hierarchy (e.g., the drop-down menus in the ordered group can be defaulted to blank values). In these embodiments, the visualization component may not display a visualization until a valid data hierarchy is specified via the drop-down menus by the user.
Once the user interface has been displayed, the user can operate a particular drop-down menu in the UI control component and change the menu's selected value. For example, the user may wish to modify, or pivot, the data hierarchy such that a particular attribute of the data set is at the highest level of the hierarchy. In this case, the user can operate the first drop-down menu in the ordered group and change its selected value to the desired attribute. In response, information about this selection change can be received by the computer system (block 108) and the visualization of the data set (displayed via the visualization component) can be automatically updated to reflect the new data hierarchy (block 110). In this manner, the user can interactively modify the data hierarchy for the data set via the drop-down menus and see the results of those modifications in real-time or near real-time in the user interface.
In certain embodiments, when a selected value for a particular drop-down menu is changed, the selectable options for one or more other drop-down menus that follow that particular drop-down menu in the ordered group can be automatically updated to prevent the user from specifying an invalid data hierarchy (block 112). For instance, returning to the example above, assume the user has changed the selected value for the first drop-down menu in the ordered group (i.e., the drop-down menu corresponding to the highest level in the data hierarchy). In this case, the selectable options for other drop-down menus that follow the first drop-down menu in the ordered group can be automatically restricted to include only attribute values that will result in valid data hierarchies.
Once the user interface is updated per blocks 110 and 112, process 100 can return to block 106 where the user interface can be re-displayed to the user. Blocks 108-112 can then be repeated, thereby allowing the user to make any number of additional modifications to the data hierarchy.
It should be appreciated that process 100 is illustrative and that variations and modifications are possible. For example, in certain embodiments the user interface generated at block 104 can only comprise the UI control component (rather than both the UI control component and the visualization component). In these embodiments, the user interface would not display a visualization of the user-specified data hierarchy, and thus block 110 would not apply. Further, steps described as sequential can be executed in parallel, order of steps may be varied, and steps can be modified, combined, added, or omitted. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize many variations, modifications, and alternatives.
User interface 300 also includes a visualization component 304 comprising a visualization of data set 200. In various embodiments, this visualization can be generated based on the data hierarchy specified via UI control component 302. For example, in the illustrated embodiment, the visualization is generated based on the data hierarchy “organization>customer>item,” which is the currently selected hierarchy in UI control component 302. As shown, the visualization is a treemap visualization. However, in alternative embodiments the visualization can also be any type of hierarchical visualization as known in the art.
Each drop-down menu in UI control component 302 can be populated with a selectable list of attributes from data set 200. In one set of embodiments, the selectable lists for the various drop-down menus can be identical. In other embodiments, the selectable lists can differ and can be automatically defined in a manner that prevents a user from specifying an invalid data hierarchy for the data set. Examples of invalid data hierarchies include hierarchies that include the same attribute at multiple levels, and/or hierarchies that define a first attribute as a child of a second attribute even though the first attribute cannot be properly considered a sub-categorization of the second attribute.
By way of example,
In one set of embodiments, the selectable lists for drop-down menus 402-408 can be automatically updated in response to a change in selection for a particular menu. This ensures that the menus remain “in sync” and thereby prevent user specification of an invalid data hierarchy. For example,
At block 602, a data set can be received at a computer system, where the data set includes values for a plurality of attributes. At block 604, a user interface can be generated as in block 104 of process 100. For example, the user interface can include (1) a first UI control component (e.g., an ordered group of drop-down menus) for specifying a data hierarchy for a data set and (2) a visualization component for visualizing the data set according to the data hierarchy.
In the embodiment of
Once the user interface has been generated, it can be displayed to a user (block 606). At block 608, an input to the second UI control component can be received, where the input is intended to disable a particular drop-down menu in the first UI control component (thereby disabling a corresponding level in the data hierarchy). In response, the visualization displayed in the user interface can be automatically updated to reflect the new data hierarchy (block 610) and the affected drop-down menu can be disabled (block 612).
For example, if first UI control component includes three drop-down menus (corresponding to a three level hierarchy) and if the second UI control component is used to disable the third drop-down menu, the visualization can be updated to display only the first two levels of the hierarchy. In addition, the third drop-down menu can be disabled such that the menu can no longer by operated by the user.
In a particular embodiment, the second UI control component can only be used to disable a particular drop-down menu in the ordered group if all other drop-down menus following that particular menu in the group have been disabled. In other words, the second UI control component can only be used to reduce the depth of data hierarchy in a “bottom up” fashion. In alternative embodiments, the second UI control component may operate differently, For example, in one alternative embodiment the second UI control component may allow the filtering of hierarchy levels in a “top down” rather than “bottom up” manner.
Once the user interface has been updated per blocks 610 and 612, process 600 can return to block 606 where the user interface can be re-displayed to the user. Blocks 608-612 can then be repeated, thereby allowing the user to make additional modifications to the depth of the data hierarchy.
It should be appreciated that process 600 is illustrative and that variations and modifications are possible. Steps described as sequential can be executed in parallel, order of steps may be varied, and steps can be modified, combined, added, or omitted. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize many variations, modifications, and alternatives.
Client computing devices 802, 804, 806, 808 can be general purpose personal computers (e.g., personal computers and/or laptop computers running various versions of Microsoft Windows and/or Apple Macintosh operating systems), cell phones or PDAs (running software such as Microsoft Windows Mobile and being Internet, e-mail, SMS, Blackberry, and/or other communication protocol enabled), and/or workstation computers running any of a variety of commercially-available UNIX or UNIX-like operating systems (including without limitation the variety of GNU/Linux operating systems). Alternatively, client computing devices 802, 804, 806, 808 can be any other electronic device capable of communicating over network 812 with server computer 810.
Server computer 810 can be a general purpose computer, specialized server computer (including, e.g., a LINUX server, UNIX server, mid-range server, mainframe computer, rack-mounted server, etc.), server farm, server cluster, or any other appropriate arrangement and/or combination. Server computer 810 can run an operating system including any of those discussed above, as well as any commercially available server operating system. Server computer 810 can also run any of a variety of server applications and/or mid-tier applications, including Web servers, Java virtual machines (JVMs), application servers, database servers, and the like. As indicated above, in one set of embodiments, server computer 810 is adapted to generate the user interfaces described herein and process user inputs to those interfaces.
As shown, client computing devices 802, 804, 806, 808 and server computer 810 are communicatively coupled via network 812. Network 812 can be any type of network that supports data communications using any of a variety of protocols, including without limitation TCP/IP, SNA, IPX, AppleTalk, and the like. Merely by way of example, network 812 can be a local area network (LAN), such as an Ethernet network, a Token-Ring network and/or the like; a wide-area network; a virtual network, including without limitation a virtual private network (VPN); the Internet; an intranet; an extranet; a public switched telephone network (PSTN); an infrared network; a wireless network (e.g., a network operating under any of the IEEE 802.11 suite of protocols, the Bluetooth protocol known in the art, and/or any other wireless protocol); and/or any combination of these and/or other networks.
System environment 800 can also include a database 814. In one set of embodiments, database 814 can be configured to store any of the data described in the foregoing disclosure, such as the data sets received in
Computer system 900 can additionally include a computer-readable storage media reader 912, a communications subsystem 914 (e.g., a modem, network card (wireless or wired), infra-red communication device, etc.), and working memory 918, which can include RAM and ROM devices as described above. In some embodiments, computer system 900 can also include a processing acceleration unit 916, which can include a digital signal processor (DSP), a special-purpose processor, and/or the like.
Computer-readable storage media reader 912 can further be connected to a computer-readable storage medium 910, together (and, optionally, in combination with storage device(s) 908) comprehensively representing remote, local, fixed, and/or removable storage devices plus storage media for temporarily and/or more permanently containing computer-readable information. Communications system 914 can permit data to be exchanged with network 812 of
Computer system 900 can also comprise software elements, shown as being currently located within working memory 918, including an operating system 920 and/or other code 922, such as an application program (which may be a client application, Web browser, Web server, RDBMS, etc.). It should be appreciated that alternative embodiments of computer system 900 may have numerous variations from that described above. For example, customized hardware might also be used and/or particular elements might be implemented in hardware, software (including portable software, such as applets), or both. Further, connection to other computing devices such as network input/output devices can be employed.
In one set of embodiments, the techniques described herein can be implemented as program code executable by a computer system (such as a computer system 900) and can be stored on machine (e.g., computer) readable storage media. Machine-readable storage media can include any appropriate media known or used in the art, including volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage and/or transmission of information such as machine-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data, including RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disk (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store or transmit the desired information and which can be accessed by a computer.
Although specific embodiments of the present invention have been described herein, various modifications, alterations, alternative constructions, and equivalents are within the scope of the invention. For example, embodiments of the present invention are not restricted to operation within certain specific data processing environments, but are free to operate within a plurality of data processing environments. Additionally, although embodiments of the present invention have been described using a particular series of transactions and steps, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the scope of the present invention is not limited to the described series of transactions and steps.
Further, while embodiments of the present invention have been described using a particular combination of hardware and software, it should be recognized that other combinations of hardware and software are also within the scope of the present invention. Embodiments of the present invention can be implemented only in hardware, or only in software, or using combinations thereof.
The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. The scope of the invention should be determined not with reference to the above description, but instead should be determined with reference to the pending claims along with their full scope or equivalents.
This application is a continuation of, and claims benefit and priority to application Ser. No. 12/503,404, filed Jul. 15, 2009, entitled “USER INTERFACE CONTROLS FOR SPECIFYING DATA HIERARCHIES” (now allowed), the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein, under 35 U.S.C. §120.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5555354 | Strasnick et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
6104398 | Cox, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108006 | Hoppe | Aug 2000 | A |
6285366 | Ng et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6349315 | Sonoyama et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6429868 | Dehner, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6496832 | Chi et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6581068 | Bensoussan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6583794 | Wattenberg | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6628312 | Rao et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6646652 | Card et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6724403 | Santoro et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6812941 | Brown et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6928436 | Baudel | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941513 | Meystel et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963339 | Leah et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7027052 | Thorn et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7076742 | Thorn et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7250944 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7287234 | Leah et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7336279 | Takiguchi | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7346858 | Berg et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7378969 | Chan et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7427987 | Uthe | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7429987 | Leah et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7447999 | Robertson et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7506274 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509591 | Thorn et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7526494 | Rom et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7605813 | Uthe et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7650570 | Torrens et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7689570 | Fuchs | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7707517 | Bier et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7756907 | Hanrahan et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7774167 | Bregulla et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7827565 | Minium, Jr. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7921363 | Hao et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8139063 | Helfman et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8161410 | Bray | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8281282 | Smith | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8286100 | Helfman et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8640056 | Helfman et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8866815 | Helfman et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868620 | Singh | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8910084 | Helfman et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9396241 | Helfman | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20010007139 | Murray | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020046009 | Devaquet et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020143864 | Page et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169730 | Lazaridis | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169793 | Sweeney | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030030634 | Sang'udi et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030052838 | Kim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030158846 | Ikehata et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030182177 | Gallagher et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030214538 | Farrington et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030237057 | Riedl et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040046787 | Henry | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040076139 | Kang-yeh et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107277 | Levesque et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040168115 | Bauernschmidt et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181554 | Heckerman | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040183800 | Peterson | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205535 | Newman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205536 | Newman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212615 | Uthe | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225962 | Ohashi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236549 | Dalton | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243593 | Stolte et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263513 | Smith et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264513 | Shima et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050114786 | Decombe | May 2005 | A1 |
20050149269 | Thomas et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160004 | Moss | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050192930 | Hightower et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060037019 | Austin et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060044307 | Song et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060082592 | Black-Ziegelbein et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060109949 | Tkaczyk et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060218533 | Koduru | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235838 | Shan et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242063 | Peterson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242169 | Tunning | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248468 | Constantine et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070011146 | Holbrook | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070090951 | Chan et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070203902 | Bauerle | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070217689 | Yang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226640 | Holbrook et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070276228 | Vining et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080010304 | Vempala et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027980 | Owens et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027981 | Wahl | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046462 | Kaufman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059911 | Kulo et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080088628 | Lu et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080216169 | Naizhen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222129 | Komatsu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080231633 | Keller et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080278496 | Helfman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295038 | Helfman | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090012991 | Johnson | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090013270 | Helfman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090013271 | Helfman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090013281 | Helfman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090013287 | Helfman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090172603 | Lee | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100214120 | Means | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100280877 | Shelton | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287146 | Skelton | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110016432 | Helfman | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20140101591 | Helfman et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150012552 | Helfman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005011043 | Jan 2005 | JP |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,722, “Final Office Action”, dated Oct. 26, 2016, 19 pages. |
Wayback machine internet archive date of prior art, Feb. 14, 2007, 5 pages. |
Honeycomb: The Application for Turning Enterprise Data into Actionable Information, The Hive Group downloaded from the Internet: <<http://hivegroup.com/products.html>>, © 2000-2007, 3 pages. |
IE Boxing, Internet Archive: Wayback Machine. Feb. 6, 2006, available online at <http://web.archive.org/web20060206032530/http://webhost.bridgew.edu/etribou/layouts/exp/ieboxes.html>, May 20, 2010, 2 pages. |
Manufacturing Quality Management, the hive group,available online at <<www.hivegroup.com/demos/product mgmnt/product failure_ readlink.html>>, © 2000-2007, 2 pages. |
Map of the Market, Smartmoney.com, available online at http://www.smartmoney.com/marketmap/popupfresh.cfm>>, 2 pages. |
Treemap 4.1.1, University of Maryland, Feb. 7, 2004, pp. 1-7. |
Andrienko et al., Interactive maps for visual data exploration, available online at http://geoanalytics.net/and/papers/ijgis99.pdf, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 13, No. 4, 1999, pp. 355-374. |
Kolatch et al., CatTrees: Dynamic Visualization of Categorical Data Using Treemaps, available online at http://www.cs.umd.edu/c1ass/spring2001/cmsc838b/Project/Kolatch_Wei nstein/index. html, May 2001, pp. 1-12. |
Shneiderman, Tree Visualization with Tree-Maps: 2-d Space-Filling Approach, ACM Transactions on Graphics, available online at «http://hcil.cs.umd.edu/trs/91-03/91-03.html»vol. 11, No. 1, Jan. 1992, pp. 92-99. |
Shneiderman, Treemaps for space-constrained visualization of hierarchies, available online at http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/treemap-history/, Jun. 17, 2008, 12 pages. |
Singh et al., Enterprise Reporting with Oracle Reports: Reliable, Extensible, and Integrated, Oracle Reports Whitepaper, Aug. 2005, 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,280, Final Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2010, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,280, Non-Final Office Action dated May 24, 2010, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,280, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 17, 2011, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,915, Final Office Action dated Feb. 6, 2014, 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,915, Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 12, 2013, 15 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,915, Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2010, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,915, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 20, 2014, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,915, Final Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2010, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,915, Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2012, 18 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,915, Final Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2012, 18 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,880, Final Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2011, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,880, Final Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2013, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,880, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2013, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,880, Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2010, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,880, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 8, 2014, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,895, Final Office Action dated May 17, 2012, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,895, Final Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2011, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,895, Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2010, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,895, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 28, 2013, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,895, Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2012, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,895, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 27, 2013, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,908, Final Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2011, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,908, Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2010, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,908, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 10, 2012, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,908, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 11, 2012, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,916, Advisory Action dated Feb. 9, 2011, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,916, Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2015, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,916, Final Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2010, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,916, Final Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2012, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,916, Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2014, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,916, Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2011, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,916, Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2010, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,916, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 21, 2016, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,404, Final Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2013, 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,404, Final Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2013, 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,404, Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2012, 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,404, Notice of Allowance dated May 5, 2016, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/103,692, Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2015, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/103,692, Notice of Allowance dated May 25, 2016, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,722, Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2016, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160291819 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12503404 | Jul 2009 | US |
Child | 15187615 | US |