A. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to the field of user interfaces for an electronic device having a screen.
B. Related Art
Time Warner Corporation field tested a prototype system called FSN, documented in “Technology Ready for Prime Time”, TIME (Domestic), 12/26/94, vol. 144, #26 and on the worldwide web at http://pathfinder.com/@@6J510gcAT1QAg1yH/Corp/divisions/fsn/0O. This system featured a rotating menu with buttons that moved past the cursor.
The object of the invention is to create an improved user interface.
This object is achieved with a rotating menu. The menu has a perspective which allows a highlighted option to appear to be in front. Some of the options rotate off the screen so that a variable number can be added.
In a further embodiment a display of the actual status of a hightlighted device is displayed on the user interface.
The invention will now be described by way of non-limitative example with reference to the following drawings.
In order to maintain perspective, the appearance of the menu options needs to change during rotation of the menu. For instance, the boxes of the menu of
The sense of perspective can be heightened by depicting shadows 501 under the boxes, as shown in
Preferably, the center of the apparent circle is off center on the screen, so that at least one menu option can be rotated off the screen. Because at least one menu option is rotated off the screen, any number of menu options can be added to the menu without affecting the shape of the display. This facilitates adding additional items to the menu or the system without complicating the display.
At the center of the display, is a picture in picture (PIP) feature. When a particular option is highlighted, a status indication for that option can be displayed in the PIP. The status indication can take the form of a preview. For instance, if the VCR is highlighted, the PIP can display what the VCR is playing or recording. Alternatively, the PIP might contain some text summary of the status of or a menu for the highlighted device.
The menu options can be displayed in any fashion desired. They can, for instance, be boxes, as shown, or icons, or letters.
During operation of the menu, the options rotate, with a selectable option appearing highlighted at the bottom front, as the TV option is shown highlighted in
Once an option is selected, the screen turns to displaying information regarding control of the device corresponding to that option. For instance, the screen might display a further rotating menu for controlling the selected device. Alternatively, the screen might display some other menu relating to the selected device. Still another alternative might be that the user would have to pick up a remote relating to that other device.
A menu of the sort shown can be created using standard software tools such as Stratavision 3D or Macromedia Director. Such software packages allow entry of three dimensional models. Animation can be created by asking the software for sequential views, which can be put together in sequence. Highlighting can be created by changing color of the menu options on the screen.
In this display, the agent is humanoid and asking a question which can be answered yes or no. One of ordinary skill in the art might display the agent in any convenient way.
The buttons 301 and 302 form a curve. Inside the curve is a third button 303 for selecting a currently highlighted menu item. The other buttons appearing on the remote are optional. One of ordinary skill in the art might determine any convenient arrangement of buttons. Those chosen in
In general eliminating buttons on a remote tends to make that remote easier to use. Accordingly, it may be preferable to have most options selectable with a menu and only essential buttons on the remote. Those of ordinary skill in the art will design the remote with those buttons that are best for particular applications.
While the preferred embodiment here relates to controlling a television, the concepts shown here might relate to a menu on any device with a display.
From reading the present disclosure, other modifications will be apparent to persons skilled in the art. Such modifications may involve other features which are already known in the design, manufacture and use of screen devices and remotes and which may be used instead of or in addition to features already described herein. Although claims have been formulated in this application to particular combinations of features, it should be understood that the scope of the disclosure of the present application also includes any novel feature or novel combination of features disclosed herein either explicitly or implicitly or any generalization thereof, whether or not it mitigates any or all of the same technical problems as does the present invention. The applicants hereby give notice that new claims may be formulated to such features during the prosecution of the present application or any further application derived therefrom.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5218672 | Morgan et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5270689 | Hermann | Dec 1993 | A |
5353121 | Young et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5484197 | Hoarty | Jan 1996 | A |
5485197 | Hoarty | Jan 1996 | A |
5500794 | Fujita et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5508736 | Cooper | Apr 1996 | A |
5528304 | Cherrick et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5543857 | Wehmeyer et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5604544 | Bertram | Feb 1997 | A |
5616031 | Logg | Apr 1997 | A |
5627531 | Posso et al. | May 1997 | A |
5648813 | Tanigawa et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5687331 | Volk et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5995106 | Naughton et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6160551 | Naughton et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0498082 | Aug 1992 | EP |
0626635 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0626635 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0626635 | May 2003 | EP |
7044477 | Feb 1995 | JP |
7098640 | Apr 1995 | JP |
WO 9428479 | Dec 1994 | WO |
9501058 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9500597 | Jan 1995 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Philip Elmer-Dewitt, “Ready for Prime Time?” Time Magazine, vol. 144, No. 26, December 26, 1994, pp. 74-75. |
“Household Information Devices Compete, Part I: Rivals of Personal Computers, Anything Other Than Wintel Selected Becasue of the Cost”, Nikkei Byte, vol. 142, Published by Nikkei Business Publication, Inc., September 1995, pp. 134-154. |
D. Hopkins, “Directional Selection is Easy as Pie Menus!”, USENIX Association, Fourth Computer Graphics Workshop, Cambridge, MA, Oct. 6-9 1987, p. 103. |
J. Callahan et al, “An Empirical Comparison of Pie vs. Linear Menus”, Sep. 1987, pp. 1-14. |
Screen dump of FSN screen. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08772080 | Dec 1996 | US |
Child | 12605738 | US |