People often want to know what other people think about television shows, music, movies, and the like. Currently, a person may find out by contacting his friends and asking them if they liked a particular movie, for example. This approach, however, can be time consuming, incomplete, or inaccurate. Asking friends may take a long while, some friends may not have seen the movie, or some friends may have forgotten much of their impression of the program, and so reply with an inaccurate account.
A person may instead search out reviews of a program, such as published critical reviews, or a source that averages online ratings from critics or typical consumers. This approach, however, can also be time consuming or fail to help the person find out if he or she would like the program because the person may not have similar tastes to those of the movie critic or typical consumer.
This document describes techniques and apparatuses enabling a user interface for presenting a media reaction. The techniques receive media reactions of a person to a media program, such as the person laughing at one point of a comedy show, then smiling at another point, and then departing at a third point. The techniques may present these and other media reactions in a user interface through which a user may interact. In one embodiment, for example, the techniques present a time-based graph showing a person's reactions over the course of a media program and enabling selection to view the media reaction and/or a portion of the media program corresponding to the media reaction.
This summary is provided to introduce simplified concepts enabling a user interface presenting a media reaction, which is further described below in the Detailed Description. This summary is not intended to identify essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended for use in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Embodiments of techniques and apparatuses enabling a user interface for presenting a media reaction are described with reference to the following drawings. The same numbers are used throughout the drawings to reference like features and components:
Overview
This document describes techniques and apparatuses enabling a user interface for presenting a media reaction. The techniques enable users to know how other people reacted to various media programs. A user can quickly and easily see not only who viewed a media program, but what portions they liked or did not like.
Consider, for example, a 30-minute situational comedy, such as The Office, which is typically 22 minutes in total content (eight of the 30 minutes are advertisements). Assume that a user named Melody Pond has not yet watched a particular episode of The Office and wants to know how her sister Amelia Pond, her brother Calvin Pond, and her friend Lydia Brown liked the episode. The techniques enable a user interface that presents media reactions of all three people, assuming that all three have watched that episode. This user interface can present overall impressions of the episode, such as a rating (e.g., four stars), how engaged or interested each person was at each portion of the episode, and states (e.g., laughing, smiling, and talking) for each person throughout the program.
Assume here that Amelia laughed and smiled through most of the episode but cried at one point, Calvin smiled a couple times but was mostly disinterested, and that Lydia was distracted through some portions but laughed in many others. On seeing these media reactions, Melody may select to watch the portion of the episode that caused Amelia to cry, for example. On seeing this portion, Melody may better understand her sister or at least be able to talk with her about that portion of the episode. Melody may instead decide not to watch the episode based on her knowing that she and Calvin have similar tastes in comedies because Calvin didn't seem to enjoy it. Or Melody may select to watch the episode and have Amelia's reactions accompany the episode, such as with an avatar representing Amelia laughing and smiling during the episode at points where Amelia also laughed and smiled.
This is but one example of how techniques and/or apparatuses enabling a user interface presenting a media reaction can be performed. Techniques and/or apparatuses that present and/or determine media reactions are referred to herein separately or in conjunction as the “techniques” as permitted by the context. This document now turns to an example environment in which the techniques can be embodied, after which various example methods for performing the techniques are described.
Example Environment
Media presentation device 102 presents a media program to an audience 114 having one or more persons 116. A media program can include, alone or in combination, a television show, a movie, a music video, a video clip, an advertisement, a blog, a web page, an e-book, a computer game, a song, a tweet, or other audio and/or video media. Audience 114 can include one or more multiple persons 116 that are in locations enabling consumption of a media program presented by media presentation device 102 and measurement by audience-sensing device 104, whether separately or within one audience 114. In audience 114 three persons are shown: 116-1, 116-2, and 116-3.
Audience-sensing device 104 is capable of passively sensing audience 114 and providing sensor data for audience 114 to state module 106 and/or interest module 108 (sensor data 118 shown provided via an arrow). In this context, sensor data is passive by not requiring active participation of persons in the measurement of those persons. Examples of active sensor data include data recorded by persons in an audience, such as with hand-written logs, and data sensed from users through biometric sensors worn by persons in the audience. Passive sensor data can include data sensed using emitted light or other signals sent by audience-sensing device 104, such as with an infrared sensor bouncing emitted infrared light off of persons or the audience space (e.g., a couch, walls, etc.) and sensing the light that returns. Examples of passive sensor data and ways in which it is measured are provided in greater detail below.
Audience-sensing device 104 may or may not process sensor data prior to providing it to state module 106 and/or interest module 108. Thus, sensor data may be or include raw data or processed data, such as: RGB (Red, Green, Blue) frames; infrared data frames; depth data; heart rate; respiration rate; a person's head orientation or movement (e.g., coordinates in three dimensions, x, y, z, and three angles, pitch, tilt, and yaw); facial (e.g., eyes, nose, and mouth) orientation, movement, or occlusion; skeleton's orientation, movement, or occlusion; audio, which may include information indicating orientation sufficient to determine from which person the audio originated or directly indicating which person, or what words were said, if any; thermal readings sufficient to determine or indicating presence and locations of one of persons 116; and distance from the audience-sensing device 104 or media presentation device 102. In some cases audience-sensing device 104 includes infrared sensors (webcams, Kinect cameras), stereo microphones or directed audio microphones, and a thermal reader (in addition to infrared sensors), though other sensing apparatuses may also or instead be used.
State module 106 receives sensor data and determines, based on the sensor data, states of persons 116 in audience 114 (shown at arrow 120). States include, for example: sad, talking, disgusted, afraid, smiling, scowling, placid, surprised, angry, laughing, screaming, clapping, waving, cheering, looking away, looking toward, leaning away, leaning toward, asleep, or departed, to name just a few.
The talking state can be a general state indicating that a person is talking, though it may also include subcategories based on the content of the speech, such as talking about the media program (related talking) or talking that is unrelated to the media program (unrelated talking) State module 106 can determine which talking category through speech recognition.
State module 106 may also or instead determine, based on sensor data, a number of persons, a person's identity and/or demographic data (shown at 122), or engagement (shown at 124) during presentation. Identity indicates a unique identity for one of persons 116 in audience 114, such as Susan Brown. Demographic data classifies one of persons 116, such as 5 feet, 4 inches tall, young child, and male or female. Engagement indicates whether a person is likely to be paying attention to the media program, such as based on that person's presence or head orientation. Engagement, in some cases, can be determined by state module 106 with lower-resolution or less-processed sensor data compared to that used to determine states. Even so, engagement can be useful in measuring an audience, whether on its own or to determine a person's interest using interest module 108.
Interest module 108 determines, based on sensor data 118 and/or a person's engagement or state (shown with dashed-line arrow 126) and information about the media program (shown at media type arrow 128), that person's interest level (arrow 130) in the media program. Interest module 108 may determine, for example, that multiple laughing states for a media program intended to be a serious drama indicate a low level of interest and conversely, that for a media program intended to be a comedy, that multiple laughing states indicate a high level of interest.
As illustrated in
State module 106 and interest module 108 can be local to audience 114, and thus media presentation device 102 and audience-sensing device 104, though this is not required. An example embodiment where state module 106 and interest module 108 are local to audience 114 is shown in
Interface module 110 receives media reactions (overall or otherwise) and demographics/identity information, and determines or receives some indication as to which media program the reactions pertain. Interface module 110 presents, or causes to be presented, a media reaction (shown at arrow 132) to a media program through user interface 112. This media reaction can be any of the above-mentioned reactions, some of which are presented in a time-based graph to show a person's reaction over the course of the associated media program.
Interface module 110 can be local to audience 114, such as in cases where one person is viewing his or her own media reactions or those of a family member. In many cases, however, interface module 110 receives media reactions from a remote source.
As shown in
Remote computing device 302 includes one or more processors 306 and remote computer-readable storage media (“remote media”) 308. Remote media 308 includes state module 106, interest module 108, and media program(s) 210, each of which may include or have associated program information 212. Note that in this illustrated example, media presentation device 102 and audience-sensing device 104 are physically separate from state module 106 and interest module 108, with the first two local to an audience viewing a media program and the second two operating remotely. Thus, as will be described in greater detail below, sensor data is passed from audience-sensing device 104 to one or both of state module 106 or interest module 108, which can be communicated locally (
These and other capabilities, as well as ways in which entities of
Example Methods
Block 402 senses or receives sensor data for an audience or person, the sensor data passively sensed during presentation of a media program to the audience or person.
Consider, for example, a case where an audience includes three persons 116, persons 116-1, 116-2, and 116-3 all of
Sensor data is received for all three persons 116 in audience 114; for this example consider first person 116-1. Assume here that, over the course of Incredible Family, that audience-sensing device 104 measures, and then provides at block 402, the following at various times for person 116-1:
Block 404 determines, based on the sensor data, a state of the person during the media program. In some cases block 404 determines a probability for the state or multiple probabilities for multiple states, respectively. For example, block 404 may determine a state likely to be correct but with less than full certainty (e.g., 90% chance that the person is laughing). Block 404 may also or instead determine that multiple states are possible based on the sensor data, such as a sad or placid state, and probabilities for each (e.g., sad state 65%, placid state 35%).
Block 404 may also or instead determine demographics, identity, and/or engagement. Further, methods 400 may skip block 404 and proceed directly to block 406, as described later below.
In the ongoing example, state module 106 receives the above-listed sensor data and determines the following corresponding states for person 116-1:
At Time 1 state module 106 determines, based on the sensor data indicating a 3-degree deviation of person 116-1's head from looking directly at the LCD display and a rule indicating that the looking toward state applies for deviations of less than 20 degrees (by way of example only), that person 116-1's state is looking toward the media program. Similarly, at Time 2, state module 106 determines person 116-1 to be looking away due to the deviation being greater than 20 degrees.
At Time 3, state module 106 determines, based on sensor data indicating that person 116-1 has skeletal movement in his arms and audio that is high amplitude that person 116-1 is clapping. State module 106 may differentiate between clapping and other states, such as cheering, based on the type of arm movement (not indicated above for brevity). Similarly, at Time 4, state module 106 determines that person 116-1 is cheering due to arm movement and high-amplitude audio attributable to person 116-1.
At Time 5, state module 106 determines, based on sensor data indicating that person 116-1 has head movement, facial-feature changes of 20%, and moderate-amplitude audio, that person 116-1 is laughing. Various sensor data can be used to differentiate different states, such as screaming, based on the audio being moderate-amplitude rather than high-amplitude and the facial-feature changes, such as an opening of the mouth and a rising of both eyebrows.
For Time 6, audience-sensing device 104 processes raw sensor data to provide processed sensor data, and in this case facial recognition processing to provide detailed facial orientation data. In conjunction with no audio, state module 106 determines that the detailed facial orientation data (here upturned lip corners, amount of eyelids covering eyes) that person 116-1 is smiling.
At Time 7, state module 106 determines, based on sensor data indicating that person 116-1 has skeletal movement moving away from the audience-sensing device 104, that person 116-1 is departed. The sensor data may indicate this directly as well, such as in cases where audience-sensing device 104 does not sense person 116-1's presence, either through no skeletal or head readings or a thermal signature no longer being received.
At Time 8, state module 106 determines, based on sensor data indicating that person 116-1's facial orientation has not changed over a certain period (e.g., the person's eyes have not blinked) and a steady, slow respiration rate that person 116-1 is asleep.
These eight sensor readings are simplified examples for purpose of explanation. Sensor data may include extensive data as noted elsewhere herein. Further, sensor data may be received measuring an audience every fraction of a second, thereby providing detailed data for tens, hundreds, and thousands of periods during presentation of a media program and from which states or other media reactions may be determined.
Returning to methods 400, block 404 may determine demographics, identity, and engagement in addition to a person's state. State module 106 may determine or receive sensor data from which to determine demographics and identity or receive, from audience-sensing device 104, the demographics or identity. Continuing the ongoing example, the sensor data for person 116-1 may indicate that person 116-1 is John Brown, that person 116-2 is Lydia Brown, and that person 116-3 is Susan Brown, for example. Or sensor data may indicate that person 116-1 is six feet, four inches tall and male (based on skeletal orientation), for example. The sensor data may be received with or include information indicating portions of the sensor data attributable separately to each person in the audience. In this present example, however, assume that audience-sensing device 104 provides three sets of sensor data, with each set indicating the identity of the person along with the sensor data.
Also at block 404, the techniques may determine an engagement of an audience or person in the audience. As noted, this determination can be less refined than that of states of a person, but nonetheless is useful. Assume for the above example, that sensor data is received for person 116-2 (Lydia Brown), and that this sensor data includes only head and skeletal orientation:
State module 106 receives this sensor data and determines the following corresponding engagement for Lydia Brown:
At Times 1, 2, 7, and 8, state module 106 determines, based on the sensor data indicating a 5-degree-or-less deviation of person 116-2's head from looking directly at the LCD display and skeletal orientation of upper torso forward of lower torso (indicating that Lydia is leaning forward to the media presentation) that Lydia is highly engaged in Incredible Family at these times.
At Time 3, state module 106 determines that Lydia's engagement level has fallen due to Lydia no longer leaning forward. At Time 4, state module 106 determines that Lydia's engagement has fallen further to medium based on Lydia leaning back, even though she is still looking almost directly at Incredible Family.
At Times 5 and 6, state module 106 determines Lydia is less engaged, falling to Medium-Low and then Low engagement based on Lydia still leaning back and looking slightly away (16 degrees) and then significantly away (37 degrees), respectively. Note that at Time 7 Lydia quickly returns to a High engagement, which media creators are likely interested in, as it indicates content found to be exciting or otherwise captivating.
Methods 400 may proceed directly from block 402 to block 406, or from block 404 to block 406 or block 408. If proceeding to block 406 from block 404, the techniques determine an interest level based on the type of media being presented and the person's engagement or state. If proceeding to block 406 from block 402, the techniques determine an interest level based on the type of media being presented and the person's sensor data, without necessarily first or independently determining the person's engagement or state.
Continuing the above examples for persons 116-1 and 116-2, assume that block 406 receives states determined by state module 106 at block 404 for person 116-1 (John Brown). Based on the states for John Brown and information about the media program, interest module 108 determines an interest level, either overall or over time, for Incredible Family. Assume here that Incredible Family is both an adventure and a comedy program, with portions of the movie marked as having one of these media types. While simplified, assume that Times 1 and 2 are marked as comedy, Times 3 and 4 are marked as adventure, Times 5 and 6 are marked as comedy, and that Times 7 and 8 are marked as adventure. Revisiting the states determined by state module 106, consider the following again:
Based on these states, state module 106 determines for Time 1 that John Brown has a medium-low interest in the content at Time 1—if this were of an adventure or drama type, state module 106 may determine John Brown to instead be highly interested. Here, however, due to the content being comedy and thus intended to elicit laughter or a similar state, interest module 108 determines that John Brown has a medium-low interest at Time 1. Similarly, for Time 2, interest module 108 determines that John Brown has a low interest at Time 2 because his state is not only not laughing or smiling but is looking away.
At Times 3 and 4, interest module 108 determines, based on the adventure type for these times and states of clapping and cheering, that John Brown has a high interest level. At time 6, based on the comedy type and John Brown smiling, that he has a medium interest at this time.
At Times 7 and 8, interest module 108 determines that John Brown has a very low interest. Here the media type is adventure, though in this case interest module 108 would determine John Brown's interest level to be very low for most types of content.
As can be readily seen, advertisers, media providers, and media creators can benefit from knowing a person's interest level. Here assume that the interest level is provided over time for Incredible Family, along with demographic information about John Brown. With this information from numerous demographically similar persons, a media creator may learn that male adults are interested in some of the adventure content but that most of the comedy portions are not interesting, at least for this demographic group.
Consider, by way of a more-detailed example,
Note that, in some cases, engagement levels, while useful, may be less useful or accurate than states and interest levels. For example, state module 106 may determine, for just engagement levels, that a person is not engaged if the person's face is occluded (blocked) and thus not looking at the media program. If the person's face is blocked by that person's hands (skeletal orientation) and audio indicates high-volume audio, state module 106, when determining states, may determine the person to be screaming. A screaming state indicates, in conjunction with the content being horror or suspense, an interest level that is very high. This is but one example of where an interest level can be markedly different from that of an engagement level.
As noted above, methods 400 may proceed directly from block 402 to block 406. In such a case, interest module 108, either alone or in conjunction with state module 106, determines an interest level based on the type of media (including multiple media types for different portions of a media program) and the sensor data. By way of example, interest module 108 may determine that for sensor data for John Brown at Time 4, which indicates skeletal movement (arms and body), and high-amplitude audio, and a comedy, athletics, conflict-based talk show, adventure-based video game, tweet, or horror types, that John Brown has a high interest level at Time 4. Conversely, interest module 108 may determine that for the same sensor data at Time 4 for a drama, melodrama, or classical music, that John Brown has a low interest level at Time 4. This can be performed based on the sensor data without first determining an engagement level or state, though this may also be performed.
Block 408, either after block 404 or 406, provides the demographics, identity, engagement, state, and/or interest level. State module 106 or interest module 108 may provide this information to various entities, such as interest module 110, as well as advertisers, media creators, and media providers. Providing this information to an advertising entity or media provider can be effective to enable the advertising entity to measure a value of their advertisements shown during a media program or the media provider to set advertisement costs. Providing this information to a media creator can be effective to enable the media creator to assess a potential value of a similar media program or portion thereof. For example, a media creator, prior to releasing the media program to the general public, may determine portions of the media program that are not well received, and thus alter the media program to improve it.
Providing this information to a rating entity can be effective to enable the rating entity to automatically rate the media program for the person. Still other entities, such as a media controller, may use the information to improve media control and presentation. A local controller may pause the media program responsive to all of the persons in the audience departing the room, for example. Providing media reactions to interest module 110 are addressed in detail in other methods described below.
Further, this information may be provided to other entities as well. Providing this information to a rating entity, for example, can be effective to enable the rating entity to automatically rate the media program for the person (e.g., four stars out of five or a “thumbs up”). Providing this information to a media controller, for example, may enable the media controller to improve media control and presentation, such as by pausing the media program responsive to all of the persons in the audience departing the room.
As noted herein, the techniques can determine numerous states for a person over the course of most media programs, even for 15-second advertisements or video snippets. In such a case block 404 is repeated, such as at one-second periods.
Furthermore, state module 106 may determine not only multiple states for a person over time, but also various different states at a particular time. A person may be both laughing and looking away, for example, both of which are states that may be determined and provided or used to determine the person's interest level.
Further still, either or both of state module 106 and interest module 108 may determine engagement, states, and/or interest levels based on historical data in addition to sensor data or media type. In one case a person's historical sensor data is used to normalize the person's engagement, states, or interest levels. If, for example, Susan Brown is viewing a media program and sensor data for her is received, the techniques may normalize or otherwise learn how best to determine engagement, states, and interest levels for her based on her historical sensor data. If Susan Brown's historical sensor data indicates that she is not a particularly expressive or vocal person, the techniques may adjust for this history. Thus, lower-amplitude audio may be sufficient to determine that Susan Brown laughed compared to an amplitude of audio used to determine that a typical person laughed.
In another case, historical engagement, states, or interest levels of the person for which sensor data is received are compared with historical engagement, states, or interest levels for other people. Thus, a lower interest level may be determined for Lydia Brown based on data indicating that she exhibits a high interest for almost every media program she watches compared to other people's interest levels (either generally or for the same media program). In either of these cases the techniques learn over time, and thereby can normalize engagement, states, and/or interest levels.
People often want to know how other people reacted to a particular program, such as to compare his or her own reactions to theirs or to decide whether or not to watch the program. By way of example, consider again the above example of Melody Pond wishing to determine which of her friends and family watched a particular episode of The Office and their reactions to it. Here assume that Melody does not yet know which of her friends and family have seen the episode and that she has not yet seen the episode.
Block 602 receives selection of a media program. This can be through selecting an icon, graphic, or label for the media program, or receiving terms for a search inquiry by which to determine the media program, or other manners. Assume here that Melody enters, into a data entry field (not shown) of user interface 112, the search terms: “the office”. In response, interface module 110 presents likely candidates, such as a movie named “the office” and the last three episodes of the television show The Office. In response, Melody selects the most-recent episode of the television show, episode 104.
Block 604 determines a person to which a selected media program has been presented and passive sensor data has been sensed during the presentation of the selected media program to the person or for which media reactions have been received. Block 604 may determine persons from a group that have indicated a selection to share media reactions with the user of the user interface, such as friends and family. Block 604 may also or instead find other people that the user doesn't know, such as published critics or famous people for which passive sensor data has been recorded. For this example, Melody's friends and family are found, namely Calvin Pond, Lydia Brown, and Amelia Pond.
At some point media reactions for a person are received by interface module 110, whether from a local or remote state module 106 or interest module 108 (e.g., at computing device 202 or remote device 302, respectively).
Block 606 presents, in a user interface, a media reaction for the person, the media reaction determined based on the passive sensor data sensed during the presentation of the selected media program to the person. The media reaction can include any of the reactions noted above, such as an overall rating for the program or a time-based graph showing reactions over the course of the program, to name just two.
A time-based graph shows media reactions for the person over at least some portion of the media program, such as at particular time periods. Interface module 110 may present the media reactions in a lower-resolution format, such as by aggregating or averaging these media reactions. If media reactions are received in one-second time periods, for example, interface module 110 may average these into larger (e.g., five- or ten-second) time periods. By so doing, a user may more-easily consume the information. Interface module 110, however, may also enable the user to select to view the original, higher resolution as well.
Consider, for example,
Interest level graph 702 shows interest levels over the 44 time periods for Calvin Pond. Interest level graph 702 shows that Calvin had a medium to very low interest level through much of the program.
Engagement graph 704 shows engagements over the 44 time periods for Lydia Brown. Engagement graph 704 shows that Lydia was highly engaged for much of the program. Here assume that Lydia watched the program through a mobile device having a lower-resolution audience-sensing device (e.g., a camera in smart phone 202-3) and thus engagements for Lydia were received.
State graph 706 shows states over the 44 time periods for Amelia Pond. State graph 706 shows that Amelia was laughing or smiling through most of the program. For visual brevity, state graph 706 shows four states, laughing, smiling, looking-away, and crying.
Average reaction graph 708 shows an average of Calvin's interest levels, Lydia's engagement, and Amelia's states. This can be useful to the user to gauge how his or her friends (in this case Melody Pond) liked the media program. An average of reactions can be any mix of reactions or just include states, engagements, or interest levels of multiple people, though this is not required. Here the average includes all three of interest levels, engagements, and states. To produce this average, the techniques may convert any non-numerical reactions, such as Amelia's states, to a number for averaging, as well as normalize and/or weight one or more of the reactions.
Graphical user interface 700 also presents four ratings, 710, 712, 714, and 716. These ratings are based on the reactions received or can be received themselves. Thus, these ratings can be determined automatically by state module 106, interest module 108, or interface module 110, or they may be based on a manual selection by the person. The first rating, 710, indicates that Calvin's rating is 2.8 out of five, which corresponds to interest level graph 702. The second rating, 712, indicates that Lydia's rating is 4.3 out of five, which corresponds to her high engagement throughout the program. The third rating, 714, summarizes Amelia's most-common state, that of laughing, and presents a laughing graphic to show this rating. The fourth rating, 716, is an average of the first, second, and third ratings, with the third rating converted into a number (4.5) to produce the fourth rating of 3.9.
Graphical user interface 700 presents an identity of the media program (The Office, Episode 104) at 718 and identifiers for individual persons at 720, 722, and 724, and a conglomerate of these individual persons at 726, which here are the person's names, though icons, avatars, graphics, or other identifiers may be used.
Returning to methods 600, the techniques may optionally enable selection, through the user interface, to display the media program or a portion thereof. This option is shown at block 608. Interface module 110 can enable selection to play all of the media program, for example, through selection of the identifier (here 718 in graphical user interface 700). A portion or portions may also be selected. Consider a case where the media reactions are presented with some correlation or associated with portions of the media program, such as with time periods in the above-described time-based graphs.
In such a case, block 608 enables selection, through the time-based graph of the user interface, to display a portion of the media program corresponding to a media reaction, such as a very high engagement in engagement graph 704 or a crying state in state graph 706. Thus, a user of graphical user interface 700, such as Melody Pond, may select a crying icon 728 in state graph 706 to see the portion of The Office during which Amelia cried. Further, interface module 110 enables users to select to see the media program in conjunction with a representation of a person's media reactions, such as through an animated avatar performing a state (e.g., laughing, clapping, or cheering) or indicating an engagement or interest level of the media reactions.
Likewise, consider a second case where a portion or portions of the media program may be selected through graphical user interface 700. Assume that a user wishes to see the best parts of a media program—such as parts where the user or one or more friends laughed at a comedy or cried during a melodrama. In the ongoing example, assume Melody Pond wishes to see the funniest parts of The Office, Episode 104, based on all three of her friend's reactions. In such a case, block 608 enables selection to display a portion or portions of the media program. Here Melody Pond may select a “Best Part!” control 730 or a “Best Five!” control 732 to see portions of The Office where all of her friends laughed (control 730) or all of them laughed or at least smiled (control 732). As in the above examples, interface module 110 may enable users to see these portions alone or in conjunction with a representation of one or more persons' media reactions.
Block 610, responsive to selection of the media program or portion thereof, causes the media program or portion to be presented. Interface module 110, for example, may cause a television to present the portion of the media program or pop up a window showing the portion over or within graphical user interface 700. In cases where the media program is selected to be presented in conjunction with a representation of the person's media reactions, interface module 110 may render the program with an avatar presented in a corner of the display, for example. Interface module 110 is not limited to representing reactions of one person, interface module 110 may present The Office with avatars for all three of Calvin, Lydia, and Amelia to show their reactions during the program.
Concluding the ongoing example, interface module 110 at block 610, in response to selection of crying icon 722, presents a 30-second clip of The Office within a portion of graphical user interface 700.
Block 802 receives selection of a person. The person may be selected through a user interface through which media reactions will be displayed, such as through a graphical representation or other identifier of the person, though this is not required.
Block 804 determines a media program that has been presented to the selected person and for which passive sensor data has been sensed during the presentation of the media program to the selected person.
By way of example, consider a case where a user of user interface 112 of
Block 806 presents, in a user interface, a time-based graph for the person, the time-based graph showing media reactions for the person and determined based on the passive sensor data sensed during the presentation of the selected media program to the person. Interface module 110 may repeat block 804 and 806 to show numerous graphs for numerous media programs, such as time-based graphs for three movies, nine television shows, four music videos, twelve tweets, and six video clips. Interface module 110 may arrange these by media category, such as movies together, then television shows, and so forth, or by rating (e.g., highest rating to lowest rating), or by order viewed, to name just a few.
The preceding discussion describes methods relating to determining or presenting a person's media reactions based on passive sensor data. Aspects of these methods may be implemented in hardware (e.g., fixed logic circuitry), firmware, software, manual processing, or any combination thereof. A software implementation represents program code that performs specified tasks when executed by a computer processor. The example methods may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, which can include software, applications, routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, procedures, modules, functions, and the like. The program code can be stored in one or more computer-readable memory devices, both local and/or remote to a computer processor. The methods may also be practiced in a distributed computing mode by multiple computing devices. Further, the features described herein are platform-independent and can be implemented on a variety of computing platforms having a variety of processors.
These techniques may be embodied on one or more of the entities shown in
Example Device
Device 900 includes communication devices 902 that enable wired and/or wireless communication of device data 904 (e.g., received data, data that is being received, data scheduled for broadcast, data packets of the data, etc.). Device data 904 or other device content can include configuration settings of the device, media content stored on the device (e.g., media programs 210), and/or information associated with a user of the device. Media content stored on device 900 can include any type of audio, video, and/or image data. Device 900 includes one or more data inputs 906 via which any type of data, media content, and/or inputs can be received, such as human utterances, user-selectable inputs, messages, music, television media content, recorded video content, and any other type of audio, video, and/or image data received from any content and/or data source.
Device 900 also includes communication interfaces 908, which can be implemented as any one or more of a serial and/or parallel interface, a wireless interface, any type of network interface, a modem, and as any other type of communication interface. Communication interfaces 908 provide a connection and/or communication links between device 900 and a communication network by which other electronic, computing, and communication devices communicate data with device 900.
Device 900 includes one or more processors 910 (e.g., any of microprocessors, controllers, and the like), which process various computer-executable instructions to control the operation of device 900 and to enable techniques enabling a user interface presenting a media reaction. Alternatively or in addition, device 900 can be implemented with any one or combination of hardware, firmware, or fixed logic circuitry that is implemented in connection with processing and control circuits which are generally identified at 912. Although not shown, device 900 can include a system bus or data transfer system that couples the various components within the device. A system bus can include any one or combination of different bus structures, such as a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, a universal serial bus, and/or a processor or local bus that utilizes any of a variety of bus architectures.
Device 900 also includes computer-readable storage media 914, such as one or more memory devices that enable persistent and/or non-transitory data storage (i.e., in contrast to mere signal transmission), examples of which include random access memory (RAM), non-volatile memory (e.g., any one or more of a read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, EPROM, EEPROM, etc.), and a disk storage device. A disk storage device may be implemented as any type of magnetic or optical storage device, such as a hard disk drive, a recordable and/or rewriteable compact disc (CD), any type of a digital versatile disc (DVD), and the like. Device 900 can also include a mass storage media device 916.
Computer-readable storage media 914 provides data storage mechanisms to store device data 904, as well as various device applications 918 and any other types of information and/or data related to operational aspects of device 900. For example, an operating system 920 can be maintained as a computer application with computer-readable storage media 914 and executed on processors 910. Device applications 918 may include a device manager, such as any form of a control application, software application, signal-processing and control module, code that is native to a particular device, a hardware abstraction layer for a particular device, and so on.
Device applications 918 also include any system components, engines, or modules to implement techniques enabling a user interface presenting a media reaction. In this example, device applications 918 can include state module 106, interest module 108, or interface module 110.
Although embodiments of techniques and apparatuses enabling a user interface presenting a media reaction have been described in language specific to features and/or methods, it is to be understood that the subject of the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or methods described. Rather, the specific features and methods are disclosed as example implementations enabling a user interface presenting a media reaction.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/309,859 filed Dec. 2, 2011, entitled “User Interface Presenting an Animated Avatar Performing a Media Reaction,” the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4288078 | Lugo | Sep 1981 | A |
4627620 | Yang | Dec 1986 | A |
4630910 | Ross et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4645458 | Williams | Feb 1987 | A |
4695953 | Blair et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4702475 | Elstein et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4711543 | Blair et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4751642 | Silva et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4796997 | Svetkoff et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4809065 | Harris et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4817950 | Goo | Apr 1989 | A |
4843568 | Krueger et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4893183 | Nayar | Jan 1990 | A |
4901362 | Terzian | Feb 1990 | A |
4925189 | Braeunig | May 1990 | A |
4931865 | Scarampi | Jun 1990 | A |
5101444 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5148154 | MacKay et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5175641 | Boerstler et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5184295 | Mann | Feb 1993 | A |
5229754 | Aoki et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5229756 | Kosugi et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5239463 | Blair et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239464 | Blair et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5288078 | Capper et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5295491 | Gevins | Mar 1994 | A |
5320538 | Baum | Jun 1994 | A |
5347306 | Nitta | Sep 1994 | A |
5385519 | Hsu et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5405152 | Katanics et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5417210 | Funda et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423554 | Davis | Jun 1995 | A |
5454043 | Freeman | Sep 1995 | A |
5469740 | French et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5495576 | Ritchey | Feb 1996 | A |
5516105 | Eisenbrey et al. | May 1996 | A |
5524637 | Erickson | Jun 1996 | A |
5528263 | Platzker et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534917 | MacDougall | Jul 1996 | A |
5563988 | Maes et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5577981 | Jarvik | Nov 1996 | A |
5580249 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5581276 | Cipolla et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594469 | Freeman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5597309 | Riess | Jan 1997 | A |
5616078 | Oh | Apr 1997 | A |
5617312 | Iura et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5638300 | Johnson | Jun 1997 | A |
5641288 | Zaenglein | Jun 1997 | A |
5682196 | Freeman | Oct 1997 | A |
5682229 | Wangler | Oct 1997 | A |
5690582 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5703367 | Hashimoto et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704837 | Iwasaki et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715834 | Bergamasco et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5801704 | Oohara et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805167 | van Cruyningen | Sep 1998 | A |
5828779 | Maggioni | Oct 1998 | A |
5875108 | Hoffberg et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877503 | Neriishi | Mar 1999 | A |
5877803 | Wee et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5904484 | Burns | May 1999 | A |
5913727 | Ahdoot | Jun 1999 | A |
5933125 | Fernie et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5980256 | Carmein | Nov 1999 | A |
5989157 | Walton | Nov 1999 | A |
5995649 | Marugame | Nov 1999 | A |
5999766 | Hisatomi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002808 | Freeman | Dec 1999 | A |
6005548 | Latypov et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009210 | Kang | Dec 1999 | A |
6054991 | Crane et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057909 | Yahav et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066075 | Poulton | May 2000 | A |
6072494 | Nguyen | Jun 2000 | A |
6073489 | French et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075895 | Qiao et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077201 | Cheng | Jun 2000 | A |
6098458 | French et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100517 | Yahav et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100896 | Strohecker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6101289 | Kellner | Aug 2000 | A |
6111580 | Kazama et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115482 | Sears | Sep 2000 | A |
6128003 | Smith et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130677 | Kunz | Oct 2000 | A |
6141463 | Covell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147678 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152856 | Studor et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159100 | Smith | Dec 2000 | A |
6173066 | Peurach et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181343 | Lyons | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181472 | Liu | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188777 | Darrell et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6215890 | Matsuo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215898 | Woodfill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222465 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226388 | Qian et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6226396 | Marugame | May 2001 | B1 |
6229913 | Nayar et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6256033 | Nguyen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256400 | Takata et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283860 | Lyons et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289112 | Jain et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291816 | Liu | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299308 | Voronka et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308565 | French et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316934 | Amorai-Moriya et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6363160 | Bradski et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377296 | Zlatsin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384819 | Hunter | May 2002 | B1 |
6411744 | Edwards | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421453 | Kanevsky et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430997 | French et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6476834 | Doval et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496598 | Harman | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498628 | Iwamura | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6502515 | Burckhardt et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6503195 | Keller et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512838 | Rafii et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514081 | Mengoli | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525827 | Liu | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6539931 | Trajkovic et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6570555 | Prevost et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6591236 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6594616 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6615177 | Rapp et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622119 | Ramaswamy et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633294 | Rosenthal et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640202 | Dietz et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6661918 | Gordon et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674877 | Jojic et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681031 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6714665 | Hanna et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6730913 | Remillard et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6731799 | Sun et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738066 | Nguyen | May 2004 | B1 |
6750848 | Pryor | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765726 | French et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6771277 | Ohba | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778171 | Kikinis | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788809 | Grzeszczuk et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801637 | Voronka et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6856827 | Seeley et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6868383 | Bangalore et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6873723 | Aucsmith et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876496 | French et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6881526 | Bobeck et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6937742 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950534 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7003134 | Covell et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7006236 | Tomasi et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007236 | Dempski et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7028001 | Muthuswamy et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7036094 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7038855 | French et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7039676 | Day et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7042440 | Pryor et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7042442 | Kanevsky et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7050177 | Tomasi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7050606 | Paul et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058204 | Hildreth et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060957 | Lange et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7096454 | Damm et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7113918 | Ahmad et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7120880 | Dryer et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7121946 | Paul et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7134130 | Thomas | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7145330 | Xiao | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151530 | Roeber et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155305 | Hayes et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162082 | Edwards | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7170492 | Bell | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7170605 | Cromwell et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7184048 | Hunter | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202898 | Braun et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7212665 | Yang et al | May 2007 | B2 |
7214932 | Brunfeld et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7217020 | Finch | May 2007 | B2 |
7222078 | Abelow | May 2007 | B2 |
7224384 | Iddan et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7227526 | Hildreth et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7246329 | Miura et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7259747 | Bell | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7293356 | Sohn et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308112 | Fujimura et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310431 | Gokturk et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7317836 | Fujimura et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7340077 | Gokturk et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7348963 | Bell | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7359121 | French et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367887 | Watabe et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7379563 | Shamaie | May 2008 | B2 |
7379566 | Hildreth | May 2008 | B2 |
7389591 | Jaiswal et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7412077 | Li et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421093 | Hildreth et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430312 | Gu | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7435941 | Ayres | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7436496 | Kawahito | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7450736 | Yang et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7452275 | Kuraishi | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460690 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7487375 | Lourie et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7489812 | Fox et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7512889 | Newell et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7536032 | Bell | May 2009 | B2 |
7538782 | Kuroki et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7555142 | Hildreth et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7559841 | Hashimoto | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7560701 | Oggier et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7568116 | Dooley et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7570805 | Gu | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7574020 | Shamaie | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7576727 | Bell | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7590262 | Fujimura et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593552 | Higaki et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598942 | Underkoffler et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7607509 | Schmiz et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7620202 | Fujimura et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627139 | Marks et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7636456 | Collins et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640304 | Goldscheider | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7643056 | Silsby | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7668340 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680298 | Roberts et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7683954 | Ichikawa et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7684592 | Paul et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7701439 | Hillis et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702130 | Im et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704135 | Harrison, Jr. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7710391 | Bell et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7729530 | Antonov et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7739140 | Vinson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7746345 | Hunter | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752633 | Fleming | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7760182 | Ahmad et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762665 | Vertegaal et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7764311 | Bill | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7770136 | Beeck et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7809167 | Bell | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7814518 | Ducheneaut et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7834846 | Bell | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7836480 | Harvey et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7852262 | Namineni et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7889073 | Zalewski | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7895076 | Kutaragi et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
RE42256 | Edwards | Mar 2011 | E |
7898522 | Hildreth et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8035612 | Bell et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8035614 | Bell et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8035624 | Bell et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8072470 | Marks | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8081302 | Paluszek et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8096660 | Vertegaal et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8102422 | Kenderov et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8132187 | Klyuchevskyy | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8141775 | Aidasani et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8189053 | Pryor | May 2012 | B2 |
8260740 | Davis et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8322856 | Vertegaal et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8327395 | Lee et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8332883 | Lee et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8418085 | Snook et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8471868 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8499245 | Froment et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8522289 | Athsani et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8620113 | Yee | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8635637 | Krum et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8660303 | Izadi et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8760395 | Kim et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8898687 | Hulten et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8943526 | Rivera et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8959541 | Conrad et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9100685 | Conrad et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20010021994 | Nash | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020041327 | Hildreth et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020072952 | Hamzy et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073417 | Kondo et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020108000 | Iori et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120925 | Logan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020144259 | Gutta et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020157095 | Masumitsu et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174230 | Gudorf et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174445 | Miller et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178446 | Sie et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030001846 | Davis et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005439 | Rovira | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030007018 | Seni et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033600 | Cliff et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030066071 | Gutta et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074661 | Krapf et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093784 | Dimitrova et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112467 | McCollum et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030118974 | Obrador | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126593 | Mault | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141360 | De Leo et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167358 | Marvin et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040001616 | Gutta et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040046736 | Pryor et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056907 | Sharma et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068409 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040070573 | Graham | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040113933 | Guler | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040155962 | Marks | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168190 | Saari et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040189720 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193413 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196309 | Hawkins | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207597 | Marks | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050010637 | Dempski et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022239 | Meuleman | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050059488 | Larsen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076365 | Popov et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050082480 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050190973 | Kristensson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050212767 | Marvit et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050212911 | Marvit et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215319 | Rigopulos et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223237 | Barletta et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050229116 | Endler et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050229199 | Yabe | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234998 | Lesandrini et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050257166 | Tu | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050289582 | Tavares et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020904 | Aaltonen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031776 | Glein et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031786 | Hillis et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060055685 | Rimas-Ribikauskas et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060073816 | Kim et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060101349 | Lieberman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060123360 | Anwar et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060158307 | Lee et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174313 | Ducheneaut et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184800 | Rosenberg | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060188144 | Sasaki et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060188234 | Takeshita | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200780 | Iwema et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210958 | Rimas-Ribikauskas | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218573 | Proebstel | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239558 | Rafii et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253793 | Zhai et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060262116 | Moshiri et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271207 | Shaw | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060280055 | Miller et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282856 | Errico et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282859 | Garbow et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070013718 | Ohba | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070018973 | Shih et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070033607 | Bryan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070060336 | Marks et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075978 | Chung | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070098222 | Porter et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070098254 | Yang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140532 | Goffin | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143715 | Hollins et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143787 | Cankaya | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150281 | Hoff | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150916 | Begole et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070203685 | Takano | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214292 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070216894 | Garcia et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219430 | Moore | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070260984 | Marks et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271580 | Tischer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279485 | Ohba et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070283296 | Nilsson | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070298882 | Marks et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001951 | Marks et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016544 | Lee et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080018591 | Pittel et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080026838 | Dunstan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027984 | Perdomo | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033790 | Nickerson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059578 | Albertson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062257 | Corson | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065243 | Fallman et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080081694 | Hong et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091512 | Marci et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080092159 | Dmitriev et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080100620 | Nagai et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080100825 | Zalewski | May 2008 | A1 |
20080124690 | Redlich | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126937 | Pachet | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134102 | Movold et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151113 | Park | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152191 | Fujimura et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080163130 | Westerman | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080163283 | Tan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178126 | Beeck | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080215972 | Zalewski et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215973 | Zalewski et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234023 | Mullahkhel et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080266328 | Fong | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080310707 | Kansal et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090013366 | You et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019397 | Buffet et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025024 | Beser et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027337 | Hildreth | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036764 | Rivas et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090037945 | Greig et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090051648 | Shamaie et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070798 | Lee et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090072992 | Yun | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090073136 | Choi | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085864 | Kutliroff et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089225 | Baier et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094627 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094628 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094629 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094630 | Brown | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106645 | Knobel | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112817 | Jung et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116684 | Andreasson | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133051 | Hildreth | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141933 | Wagg | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090143141 | Wells et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090146775 | Bonnaud et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157472 | Burazin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167679 | Klier et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090167882 | Chen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090175540 | Dariush et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090178097 | Kim et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183125 | Magal et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183220 | Amento et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090195392 | Zalewski | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090217315 | Malik et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090221368 | Yen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234718 | Green | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235195 | Shin et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090251425 | Sohn et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090252423 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259960 | Steinle et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090296002 | Lida et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090303231 | Robinet et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320055 | Langille et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327977 | Bachfischer et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005492 | Takano et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100007801 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026914 | Chung et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100033427 | Marks et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070913 | Murrett et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070987 | Amento et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070992 | Morris et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100073329 | Raman et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100083373 | White et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100086204 | Lessing | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100093435 | Glaser et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095206 | Kim | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095332 | Gran et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107184 | Shintani | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100122286 | Begeja et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138780 | Marano et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100138797 | Thorn | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100138798 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100146389 | Yoo et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100151946 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153856 | Russ | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153984 | Neufeld | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169157 | Muhonen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100169905 | Fukuchi et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191631 | Weidmann | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100207874 | Yuxin et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100207875 | Yeh | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211439 | Marci et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235667 | Mucignat et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100248832 | Esaki et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251280 | Sofos et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251300 | Fahey et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100271802 | Recker et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100278393 | Snook et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286983 | Cho | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295782 | Binder | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295783 | El Dokor et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306712 | Snook et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100327766 | Recker et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332842 | Kalaboukis et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100333137 | Hamano et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110007142 | Perez et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016102 | Hawthorne et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110026765 | Ivanich | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110037866 | Iwamoto | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110038547 | Hill | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066682 | Aldunate et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072448 | Stiers et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077513 | Rofougaran | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110084983 | Demaine | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110085705 | Izadi et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110115887 | Yoo et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126154 | Boehler et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110145040 | Zahn et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145041 | Salamatov et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157009 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161912 | Eteminan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110164143 | Shintani et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173589 | Guttman et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110208582 | Hoyle | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110214141 | Oyaizu | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110216059 | Espiritu et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242305 | Peterson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246572 | Kollenkark et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254859 | Matsuda | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110263946 | el Kaliouby et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264531 | Bhatia et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282745 | Meoded et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110316845 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110321096 | Landow et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120005632 | Broyles, III et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011528 | Nielsen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011530 | Bentolila et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120030637 | Dey et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120047525 | Campagna et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120051719 | Marvit | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120060176 | Chai et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079521 | Garg et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084812 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120105257 | Murillo et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120105473 | Bar-Zeev et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120109726 | Ruffini | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124603 | Amada | May 2012 | A1 |
20120192233 | Wong | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209715 | Lotan et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226981 | Clavin | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120268362 | Yee | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120280897 | Balan et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290508 | Bist | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304059 | McCloskey | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304206 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120306734 | Kim et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324491 | Bathiche et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007671 | Hammontree et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130014144 | Bhatia et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130054652 | Antonelli et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130117771 | Lee et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130136358 | Dedhia et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145384 | Krum | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130145385 | Aghajanyan | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130152113 | Conrad | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159555 | Rosser | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130198690 | Barsoum et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226464 | Marci et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130232515 | Rivera et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130268954 | Hulten | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268955 | Conrad | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130298146 | Conrad | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130298158 | Conrad | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140247212 | Kim | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150128161 | Conrad et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2775700 | Jul 2012 | CA |
2775814 | Sep 2013 | CA |
1478239 | Feb 2004 | CN |
1586078 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1942970 | Apr 2007 | CN |
101095055 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101169955 | Apr 2008 | CN |
101202994 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101254344 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101999108 | Mar 2011 | CN |
102713788 | Oct 2012 | CN |
0583061 | Feb 1994 | EP |
1315375 | May 2003 | EP |
2423808 | Jun 2006 | GB |
2459707 | Nov 2009 | GB |
08044490 | Feb 1996 | JP |
WO-9310708 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO-9717598 | May 1997 | WO |
WO-9915863 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-9944698 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO-0159975 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0163916 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0169799 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-02082249 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-03001722 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO-03015056 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO-03046706 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO-03054683 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO-03071410 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO-03073359 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-2007128507 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2008001287 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2009059065 | May 2009 | WO |
WO-2011069035 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/363,689, Feb. 11, 2014, 18 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/439,284, Feb. 10, 2014, 15 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,867, Feb. 21, 2014, 15 pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/038710, Jan. 8, 2014, 18 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/411,859, Mar. 11, 2014, 13 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/488,046, Mar. 14, 2014, 11 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,699, Feb. 7, 2014, 15 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,884, Feb. 4, 2014, 7 pages. |
“Foreign Notice of Allowance”, Canadian Application No. 2775700, Jan. 3, 2013, 1 page. |
“Virtual High Anxiety”, Tech update, Aug. 1995, 1 Page. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/972,837, Jun. 26, 2013, 10 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,453, Sep. 6, 2011, 10 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/972,837, Oct. 11, 2013, 10 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,884, Dec. 3, 2013, 10 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/309,589, Dec. 18, 2012, 10 pages. |
“PCT Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/035047, Jul. 5, 2013, 10 pages. |
“Response to Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,406, Feb. 14, 2013, 12 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/396,653, Feb. 20, 2009, 12 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,228, Mar. 20, 2013, 12 pages. |
“Designing CEC into your next HDMI Product”, Quantum Data White Paper, Retrieved from the Internet<URL:http://www.quantumdata.com/pdf/CEC—white—paper.pdf> Quantum Data, Inc., Elgin, IL, USA, May 13, 2006, 12 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/488,046, Dec. 10, 2013, 12 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/309,859, May 15, 2013, 13 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/396,653, Sep. 8, 2008, 13 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,867, Nov. 5, 2013, 13 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,406, Apr. 22, 2013, 14 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,453, May 10, 2012, 14 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/626,794, Jun. 11, 2009, 14 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/439,284, Nov. 8, 2013, 14 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,228, Sep. 11, 2013, 15 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/626,794, Oct. 27, 2009, 15 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,351, Feb. 14, 2013, 16 pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/035348, Sep. 25, 2013, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,180, Apr. 5, 2013, 17 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/396,653, Sep. 6, 2007, 17 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,406, Sep. 14, 2012, 17 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/396,653, Feb. 26, 2007, 18 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/363,689, Jul. 26, 2013, 18 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/626,794, Dec. 23, 2008, 18 pages. |
“GWindows: Light-Weight Stereo Vision for Interaction”, http://research.microsoft.com/˜nuria/gwindows/htm, Jul. 8, 2005, 2 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, Canadian Application No. 2775700, Aug. 24, 2012, 2 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/396,653, Feb. 25, 2008, 20 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,351, Jul. 31, 2013, 20 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/396,653, Sep. 19, 2006, 24 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/439,284, Jun. 3, 2013, 27 pages. |
“Supplementary European Search Report”, European Patent Application No. 12194891.3, Apr. 4, 2013, 3 pages. |
“European Search Report”, European Patent Application No. 12195349.1, Apr. 22, 2013, 3 pages. |
“Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/396,653, May 2, 2007, 3 pages. |
“Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/396,653, May 23, 2008, 3 pages. |
“Corrected Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/309,859, Oct. 29, 2013, 3 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, Canadian Application No. 2775814, Dec. 14, 2012, 3 pages. |
“International Search Report”, PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/036005, Dec. 24, 2010, 3 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, Canadian Application No. 2775814, Aug. 24, 2012, 3 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/439,284, Feb. 25, 2013, 31 pages. |
“Recognizing Visual Focus of Attention from Head Pose in Natural Meetings”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics—Special Issue on Human Computing, vol. 39, Issue 1, Feb. 2009, 36 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,406”, filed Jun. 4, 2010, 37 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/626,794, May 13, 2010, 4 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, European Patent Application No. 12194891.3, Apr. 24, 2013, 5 pages. |
“Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/488,046, May 2, 2013, 5 pages. |
“Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,024, Oct. 1, 2013, 5 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, European Patent Application No. 12195349.1, May 10, 2013, 5 pages. |
“Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,867, Sep. 6, 2013, 6 pages. |
“Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/114,359, Sep. 10, 2013, 6 pages. |
“Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/114,359, Dec. 18, 2013, 6 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/093,621, Jun. 20, 2013, 7 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/093,621, Aug. 21, 2013, 7 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/309,859, Sep. 4, 2013, 7 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/396,653, Nov. 19, 2009, 7 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/488,046, Jun. 13, 2013, 8 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,453, Dec. 12, 2012, 8 pages. |
“Response to Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,406, Jul. 22, 2013, 9 pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2012/034641, Nov. 30, 2012, 9 pages. |
“Application Titled “Interaction with Networked Screen Content Via Motion Sensing Device in Retail Setting””, U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,180, filed Feb. 11, 2011, pp. 1-23. |
“Application Titled “Controlling Electronic Devices in a Multimedia System Through a Natural User Interface””, U.S. Appl. No. 13/038,024, filed Mar. 2, 2011, pp. 1-46. |
“The Case for Kinect”, Eurogamer [online] Retrieved from the Internet on Aug. 20, 2010: URL:<http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-the-case-for-kinect-article?page=2>., Aug. 7, 2010, pp. 1-7. |
“Future Media Internet Research Challenges and the Road Ahead”, European Commission Information Society and Media, Available at <http://www.gatv.ssr.upm.es/nextmedia/images/fmi-tf-white—paper—042010.pdf>,Apr. 2010, 31 pages. |
“Simulation and Training”, Division Incorporated,1994, 6 Pages. |
“Signal Processing Institute”, http://ltswww.epfl.ch/˜alahi/student—projects/proposals.shtml#4, Downloaded Feb. 2, 2009, 4 pages. |
“Commanding Overview”, MSDN, retrieved from <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms752308.aspx> on Sep. 27, 2011, 11 pages. |
“KinEmote uses Kinect to translate key strokes for Windows applications”, techshout.com [online], Retrieved from the Internet:<URL:http://www.techshout.com/gaming/2010/28/kinemote-uses-kinect-to-translate-key-strokes-for-windows-applications/>,Dec. 28, 2010, 2 pages. |
“Affdex: Measuring Emotion over the Web”, Affectiva, Retrieved from: <http://www.affectiva.com/affdex/> on Nov. 4, 2011, 3 pages. |
Agarwal, et al.,' “High Precision Multi-touch Sensing on Surfaces using Overhead Cameras”, Second Annual IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer System, available at <<http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4384130>>,Nov. 19, 2007, 4 pages. |
Aggarwal, et al.,' “Human Motion Analysis: A Review”, IEEE Nonrigid and Articulated motion Workshop, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.,1997, pp. 90-102. |
Ali, et al.,' “Real-Time Self-Calibrating Stereo Person Tracking Using 3-D Shape Estimation from Blob Features”, Proceedings of ICPR, Vienna, Austria, Aug. 1996, pp. 627-632. |
Althoff, et al.,' “Using Multimodal Interaction to Navigate in Arbitrary Virtual VRML Worlds”, PUI 2001 Orlando, FL USA, available at <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.16.8034&rep=rep1&type=pdf>,2001, 8 pages. |
Argyros, et al.,' “Vision-Based Interpretation of Hand Gestures for Remote Control of a Computer Mouse”, Retrieved from: <http://www.ics.forth.gr/˜argyros/mypapers/2006—05—hci—virtualmouse.pdf> on Oct. 31, 2007, 2006, pp. 40-51. |
Asteriadis, et al.,' “Estimation of Behavioral User State based on Eye Gaze and Head Pose—Application in an e-Learning Environment”, Journal of Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 41, Issue 3, Feb. 2009, 25 pages. |
Azarbayejani, et al.,' “Visually Controlled Graphics”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 15, No. 6, Jun. 1993, pp. 602-605. |
Azoz, et al.,' “Reliable Tracking of Human Arm Dynamics by Multiple Cue Integration and Constraint Fusion”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1998, 6 pages. |
Ba, et al.,' “Head Pose Tracking and Focus of Attention Recognition Algorithms in Meeting Rooms”, Proceedings of the 1st International Evaluation Conference on Classification of Events, Activities and Relationships, Apr. 6, 2006, 12 pages. |
Baudel, et al.,' “Charade: Remote Control of Objects using Free-Hand Gestures”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 36. No. 7, Jul. 1993, 10 pages. |
Becker, “Sensei: A Real-Time Recognition, Feedback and Training System for T'ai Chi Gestures”, http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/405/ftp:zSzzSzwhitechapel.media.mit.eduzSzpubzSztech-reporterzsSzTR-426pdf/becker97sensei.pdf, Jun. 1993, 50 pages. |
Berard, “The Perceptual Window-Head Motion as a New Input Stream”, Proceedings of the Seventh IFIP Conference of Human-Computer Interaction, 1999, 238-244. |
Bhuiyan, et al.,' “Gesture-controlled user interfaces, what have we done and what's next?”, Retrieved at <<http://www.newi.ac.uk/computing/research/pubs/SEIN—BP.pdf>>, Nov. 27, 2009, 10 pages. |
Bobic, “Rotating Objects Using Quaternions”, Retrieved from the Internet on Aug. 20, 2010: URL http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/3278/rotating—objects—quarternions.php?page=2>., Jul. 5, 1998, 14 pages. |
Boser, et al.,' “A Training Algorithm for Optimal Margin Classifiers”, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, Jul. 27, 1992, 9 pages. |
Boverie, et al.,' “Comparison of Structured Light and Stereovision Sensors for New Airbag Generations”, Control Engineering Practice vol. 11, Issue 12 (2003), available at <<http://homepages.laas.fr/lerasle/pdf/cep03.pdf>>,Dec. 2003, pp. 1413-1421. |
Bowman, et al.,' “New Directions in 3D User Interfaces”, The International Journal of Virtual Reality, retrieved from <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.99.1121&rep=rep1&type=pdf> on Nov. 15, 2011,2006, pp. 3-14. |
Bradley, et al.,' “Measuring Emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential”, In Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, vol. 25, Issue 1, Mar. 1994, 11 pages. |
Breen, et al.,' “Interactive Occlusion and Collision of Real and Virtual Objects in Augmented Reality”, Technical report ECRC-95-02 European Computer-Industry Research Centre GmbH, Munich, Germany, 1995, 22 Pages. |
Brogan, et al.,' “Dynamically Simulated Characters in Virtual Environments”, vol. 18, Issue 5, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Sep./Oct. 1998, pp. 58-69. |
Buxton, et al.,' “A Study of Two-Handed Input”, Proceedings of CHI'86, 1986, pp. 321-326. |
Cedras, et al.,' “Motion-based Recognition: A Survey”, IEEE Proceedings, Image and Vision Computing, vol. 13, No. 2, Mar. 1995, pp. 129-155. |
Chang, et al.,' “LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines”, retrieved from <http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/˜cjlin/libsvm/> on Apr. 1, 2013, 4 pages. |
Crawford, “How Microsoft Kinect Works”, Howstuffworks[online] Retrieved from the Internet on Aug. 19, 2010: URL: <http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/microsoft-kinect.htm/printable>., pp. 1-5. |
Dalton, et al.,' “Sensing User Intention and Context for Energy Management”, Duke University, Department of Computer Science, Retrieved from the Internet<URL:http://www.cs.duke/edu/ari/millywatt/faceoff.pdf>, Feb. 23, 2003, 5 pages. |
Darrell, et al.,' “Integrated Person Tracking Using Stereo, Color and Pattern Detection”, Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1998, pp. 601-609. |
El et al.,' “Real Time Inference of Complex Mental States from Facial Expressions and Head Gestures”, Proceedings of Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, Jun. 27, 2004, 20 pages. |
Fisher, et al.,' “Virtual Environment Display System”, ACM Workshop on Interactive 3D Graphics, Chapel Hill, NC, Oct. 1986, 12 Pages. |
Fitzgerald, et al.,' “Multimodal Event Parsing for Intelligent User Interfaces”, IUI Conference, Jan. 2003, 8 pages. |
Fitzgerald, et al.,' “Integration of Kinematic Analysis into Computer Games for Exercise”, Proceedings of CGames 2006—9th International Conference on Computer Games: AI, Animation, Mobile, Educational and Serious Games, Dublin Ireland, Nov. 2006, pp. 24-28. |
Freed, “Toys Keeping in Touch: Technologies for Distance Play”, Retrieved from <<http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/˜daniela/tei2010/gsc09e-freed.pdf>>, Jan. 24, 2010, 2 pages. |
Freeman, et al.,' “Television Control By Hand Gestures”, International Workshop on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 1995, pp. 179-183. |
Gonzalez, “HDMI CEC”, Home Theater University [online] Retrieved from the Internet:<URL:http://www.hometheatre.com/hookmeup/208hook>, Mar. 24, 2008, 3 pages. |
Grace, et al.,' “A Drowsy Driver Detection System for Heavy Vehicles”, Proceedings of the 17th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, vol. 2, Oct. 31, 1998, 8 pages. |
Granieri, et al.,' “Simulating Humans in VR”, The British Computer Society, Academic Press, Oct. 1994, 15 Pages. |
Grunder, “Updated: Xbox 360 Kinect Hand Gesture Media Controls, Voice Control, TV Video Chat.”, eHomeUpgrade [online] retrieved from the internet:<URL:http://www.ehomeupgrade.com/2010/06/14/updated-xbox-360-kinect-hand-gesture-media-controls-voice-control-tv-video-chat/>, Jun. 14, 2010, 8 pages. |
Guiard, “Asymmetric Division of Labor in Human Skilled Bimanual Action: The Kinematic Chain as a Model”, Journal of Motor Behavior, vol. 19 Issue 4, 1987, 486-517. |
Guler, “Split and Merge Behavior Analysis and Understanding Using Hidden Markov Models”, Oct. 8, 2002, 21 pages. |
Guyon, et al.,' “An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection”, In Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 3, Mar. 2003, pp. 1157-1182. |
Hardin, “Machine Vision Makes the Leap to Consumer Gaming”, Machine Vision Online, retrieved from <<http://www.machinevisiononline.org/vision-resources-details.cfm?content—id=2398>> on Mar. 14, 2011,Dec. 8, 2010, 3 pages. |
Hasegawa, et al.,' “Human-Scale Haptic Interaction with a Reactive Virtual Human in a Real-Time Physics Simulator”, ACM Computers in Entertainment, vol. 4, No. 3, Jul. 2006, 12 Pages. |
He, “Generation of Human Body Models”, University of Auckland, New Zealand, Apr. 2005, 111 Pages. |
Hongo, et al.,' “Focus of Attention for Face and Hand Gesture Recognition Using Multiple Cameras”, 4th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, Grenoble, France, Mar. 2000, pp. 156-161. |
Horvitz, “Principles of Mixed-Initiative User Interfaces”, Proceedings of CHI, 1999, 8 pages. |
Horvitz, et al.,' “A Computational Architecture for Conversation”, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on User Modeling, 1999, pp. 201-210. |
Hourcade, “Architecture and Implementation of Java Package for Multiple Input Devices (MID)”, HCIL Technical Report No. 99-08 (May 1999); http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil, May 1999, 7 pages. |
Isard, et al.,' “Condensation—Conditional Density Propagation for Visual Tracking”, International Journal of Computer Vision 29(1), Netherlands, 1998, pp. 5-28. |
Jacko, “HDI Dune Prime 3.0 Part 2.”, Retrieved from the internet: <URL:http://www.jacko.my/2010/06/hdi-dune-prime-30-part-2.html>, Jun. 19, 2010, 15 pages. |
Jojic, et al.,' “Detection and Estimation of Pointing Gestures in Dense Disparity Maps”, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2000, pp. 1000-1007. |
Kabbash, et al.,' “The “Prince” Technique: Fitts' Law and Selection Using Area Cursor”, Proceedings of CHI'95, http://www.billbuxton.com/prince.html, 1995, pp. 273-279. |
Kanade, et al.,' “Development of Video-Rate Stereo Machine”, Proceedings of 94 ARPA Image Understanding Workshop, 1994, pp. 549-558. |
Kanade, et al.,' “A Stereo Machine for Video-rate Dense Depth Mapping and Its New Applications”, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA,1996, pp. 196-202. |
Kapoor, et al.,' “Multimodal Affect Recognition in Learning Environments”, Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Nov. 6, 2005, 6 pages. |
Kim, et al.,' “Multi-Touch Tabletop Interface Technique for HCI”, retrieved from <<http://210.119.33.7/apis6/paper/data/63-multi-touch%20tabl.pdf>> on Mar. 16, 2011, 4 pages. |
Kjeldsen, “Visual Interpretation of Hand Gestures as Practical Interface Modality”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University Department of Computer Science, 1997, 168 pages. |
Klompmaker, “D5.1—State of the art analysis and recommendations on ‘Context Awareness’, ‘Human Computer Interaction’ and ‘Mobile Users Interfaces’”, Information Technology for European Advancement (ITEA), Local Mobile Services, Retrieved from the Internet<URL:http://www.loms-itea.org/deliverables/LOMS—D5.1—v1.0.pdy>, Jul. 2, 2007, 55 pages. |
Kohler, “Special Topics of Gesture Recognition Applied in Intelligent Home Environments”, In Proceedings of the Gesture Workshop, Germany, 1998, 12 Pages. |
Kohler, “Technical Details and Ergonomical Aspects of Gesture Recognition applied in Intelligent Home Environments”, Germany, 1997, 35 Pages. |
Kohler, “Vision Based Remote Control in Intelligent Home Environments”, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany, 1996, 8 Pages. |
Kolsch, et al.,' “Vision-Based Interfaces for Mobility”, Retrieved from <<http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1331713>>, Aug. 22, 2004, 9 pages. |
Kwon, et al.,' “Combining Body Sensors and Visual Sensors for Motion Training”, Computer Graphics Laboratory, http://graphics.ethz.ch/˜dkwon/downloads/publications/ace05—ace.pdf, Downloaded 2009,2005, pp. 1-8. |
Latoschik, “A User Interface Framework for Multimodal VR Interactions”, ICMI'05, Trento, Italy, Oct. 4-6, 2005, available at <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.91.2941&rep=rep1&type=pdf>,Oct. 4, 2005, 8 pages. |
Le, “EmuPlayer: Music Recommendation System Based on User Emotion Using Vital-sensor”, Thesis, Keio University, Available at <http://www.sfc.wide.ad.jp/thesis/2011/files/sunny-publish-thesis.pdf>,2010, 85 pages. |
Leal, et al.,' “Initial Explorations into the User Experience of 3D File Browsing”, Proceedings of HCI 2009, retrieved from <http://www.eecs.ucf.edu/isuelab/publications/pubs/p339-leal-3dfiles.pdf> on Nov. 15, 2011,Sep. 2009, pp. 339-344. |
Li, et al.,' “A Near-Infrared Image Based Face Recognition System”, available at <<http://www.cbsr.ia.ac.cn/Li%20Group/papers/IR-Face-FG06.pdf>>,Apr. 2006, 6 pages. |
Liang, et al.,' “Face Alignment via Component-Based Discriminative Search”, Computer Vision, ECCV 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 5303, 2008, 14 pages. |
Livingston, “Vision-based Tracking with Dynamic Structured Light for Video See-through Augmented Reality”, TheUniversity of NorthCarolina at ChapelHill, North Carolina, USA, 1998, 145 Pages. |
Long, et al.,' “Implications for a Gesture Design Tool”, Proceedings of CHI'99, 1999, pp. 40-47. |
Maes, et al.,' “The ALIVE System: Wireless, Full-body, Interaction with Autonomous Agents”, ACM Multimedia Systems, Special Issue on Multimedia and Multisensory Virtual Worlds, Nov. 1995, 17 pages. |
Maltby, “Using Perspective in 3D File Management: Rotating Windows and Billboarded Icons”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualisation (CGIV'06), available at <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1663764>,Jul. 28, 2006, 8 pages. |
Martin, “VirHKey: A VIRtual Hyperbolic KEYboard with Gesture Interaction and Visual Feedback for Mobile Devices”, http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1090000/1085794/p99-martin.pdf?key1=1085794&key2=4890534611&coll=portal&dl=ACM&CFID=11111111&CFTOKEN=2222222, Sep. 2005, 8 pages. |
McCrae, et al.,' “Exploring the Design Space of Multiscale 3D Orientation”, AVI '10, retrieved from <http://www.autodeskresearch.com/pdf/avi2010-final.pdf> on Nov. 15, 2011,May 29, 2010, 8 pages. |
McDuff, “Affective Storytelling: Automatic Measurement of Story Effectiveness from Emotional Responses Collected over the Internet”, PhD Thesis, retrieved from <http://web.media.mil.edu/˜djmcduff/documents/McDuff— Thesis—Proposal.pdf> pdf>>,Jun. 6, 2012, 16 pages. |
McDuff, et al.,' “Crowdsourcing Facial Responses to Online Videos”, Proceedings of the IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, vol. 3, Issue 4, Oct. 2012, pp. 456-468. |
McDuff, et al.,' “AffectAura: An Intelligent System for Emotional Memory”, In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Retrieved from <http://www.affectiva.com/assets/Q-Sensor-Microsoft-Publication.pdf>,May 5, 2012, 10 pages. |
Mignot, et al.,' “An Experimental Study of Future ‘Natural’ Multimodal Human-Computer Interaction”, Proceedings of INTERCHI93, 1993, pp. 67-68. |
Millan, et al.,' “Unsupervised Defect Segmentation of Patterned Materials under NIR Illumination”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 274 (2011) 012044, available at <<http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/274/1/012044/pdf/1742-6596—274—1—012044.pdf>>,2011, 9 pages. |
Minge, “Dynamics of User Experience”, Workshop on Research Goals and Strategies for Studying User Experience and Emotion, Available at <http://www.cs.uta.fi/˜ux-emotion/submissions/Minge.pdf>,2008, pp. 1-5. |
Miyagawa, et al.,' “CCD-Based Range-Finding Sensor”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 44, No. 10, Oct. 1997, pp. 1648-1652. |
Moeslund, et al.,' “A Survey of Computer Vision-Based Human Motion Capture”, Computer Vision and Image Understanding: CVIU, vol. 81, No. 3, 2001, pp. 231-269. |
Morency, et al.,' “Contextual Recognition of Head Gestures”, Trento, Italy http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1090000/1088470/p18—morency.pdf?key1=1088470&key2=8870534611&coll=portal&dl=ACM&CFID=11111111&CFTOKEN=2222222, Oct. 2005, 7 pages. |
Morrison, “A Camera-Based Touch Interface for Pervasive Displays”, Retrieved from <<http://ubicomp.algoritmi.uminho.pt/perdisplay/docs/Morrison-Camera%20Touch—SV—Rev1.pdf>> on Mar. 16, 2011, 7 pages. |
Moscovich, “Multi-touch Interaction”, Brown University, CHI 2006, Apr. 22-27, 2006, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Apr. 22, 2006, 4 pages. |
Moyle, et al.,' “Gesture Navigation: An Alternative ‘Back’ for the Future”, Proceedings of CHI'02, 2002, pp. 882-823. |
Nielsen, et al.,' “A Procedure for Developing Intuitive and Ergonomic Gesture Interfaces for Man-Machine Interaction”, Technical Report CVMT 03-01, ISSN 1601-3646. CVMT, Aalborg University, Mar. 2003, 12 pages. |
Oh, et al.,' “Evaluating Look-to-talk: A Gaze-Aware Interface in a Collaborative Environment”, CHI'02, 2002, 650-651. |
Op et al.,' “Supporting Engagement and Floor Control in Hybrid Meetings”, In Cross-Modal Analysis of Speech, Gestures, Gaze and Facial Expressions, Jul. 2009, 15 pages. |
Oviatt, “Ten Myths of Multimodal Interaction”, Communications of the ACM. vol. 42, No. 11, Nov. 1999, 8 pages. |
Paquit, et al.,' “Near-Infrared Imaging and Structured Light Ranging for Automatic Catheter Insertion”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 6141, 61411T, (2006), available at <<http://www.cs.rpi.edu/˜chakrn2/work/catheter—plan/paquit—06.pdf>>,2006, 9 pages. |
Parrish, “Microsoft Does Want Core Games, FPS for Kinect”, Tom's Guide: Tech for Real Life [online], Retrieved from the Internet on Aug. 20, 2010: URL: <http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Core-Gamers-Kinect-FPS-Action,news-7195.html>., Jun. 23, 2010, 1 page. |
Pavlou, et al.,' “Measuring the Effects and Effectiveness of Interactive Advertising: A Research Agenda”, Journal of Interactive Advertising, vol. 1, No. 1 (Fall 2000), Available at <http://scholar.google.co.in/scholar—url?hl=en&q=http://jiad.org/download%3Fp%3D6&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm3He5PA4sgMGDXTyQuqaVQn4Q3nZw&oi=scholarr>,Oct. 2000, pp. 62-78. |
Pavlovic, et al.,' “Visual Interpretation of Hand Gestures for Human-Computer Interaction: A Review”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 19, No. 7, Jul. 1997, pp. 677-695. |
Peacock, et al.,' “Which Broadcast Medium Better Drives Engagement? Measuring the Powers of Radio and Television with Electromyography and Skin-Conductance Measurements”, In Journal of Advertising Research, vol. 51, Issue 4, Dec. 2011, 8 pages. |
Poels, et al.,' “How to Capture the Heart? Reviewing 20 Years of Emotion Measurement in Advertising”, In the Journal of Advertising Research, vol. 46, Issue 1, Mar. 2006, 48 pages. |
Qian, et al.,' “A Gesture-Driven Multimodal Interactive Dance System”, IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Taipei, Jun. 2004, pp. 1579-1582. |
Raymer, “Gestures and Words: Facilitating Recovery in Aphasia”, The ASHA Leader, http://www.asha.org/about/publications/leader-online/archives/2007/070619/f070619a.htm, Jun. 19, 2007, 6 pages. |
Rigoll, et al.,' “High Performance Real-Time Gesture Recognition Using Hidden Markov Models”, Gesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. LNAI 1371, Frohlich, ed., 1997, pp. 69-80. |
Rosenhahn, et al.,' “Automatic Human Model Generation”, University of Auckland (CITR), New Zealand, 2005, pp. 41-48. |
Sakir, “Kinect is your personal trainer in EA Sports Active 2”, Gamerss [online] Retrieved from the Internet on Aug. 20, 2010: URL: <http://www.gamerss.co.uk/kinect-is-your-personal-trainer-in-ea-sports-active-2>., Jul. 26, 2010, 4 pages. |
Schick, et al.,' “Extending Touch: Towards Interaction with Large-Scale Surfaces”, ITS '09, Nov. 23-25, 2009, Banff, Alberta, Canada, available at <<http://www.iosb.fraunhofer.de/servlet/is/33404/urn—nbn—de—0011-n-1159494.pdf>>,Nov. 23, 2009, 8 pages. |
Schielel, “A Home System Leaves Hand Controls in the Dust, Kinect by Microsoft Keeps You Entertained Hands Free”, The New York Times [online] Retrieved from the Internet:<URL:http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/04/arts/television/04kinect.html>, Nov. 4, 2010, 3 pages. |
Shao, et al.,' “An Open System Architecture for a Multimedia and Multimodal User Interface”, Japanese Society for Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities (JSRPD), Japan, Aug. 24, 1998, 8 Pages. |
Sharma, et al.,' “Method of Visual and Acoustic Signal Co-Analysis for Co-Verbal Gesture Recognition”, U.S. Appl. No. 60/413,998, filed Sep. 19, 2002, 16 pages. |
Sharma, et al.,' “Speech-Gesture Driven Multimodal Interfaces for Crisis Management”, Proceedings of IEEE Special Issue on Multimodal Human-Computer Interface, 2003, 28 pages. |
Shen, et al.,' “Dita: Enabling Gesture-Based Human-Device Interaction using Mobile Phone”, Retrieved at <<:http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/jackysh/dita.pdf>>, Oct. 1, 2010, pp. 1-14. |
Sheridan, et al.,' “Virtual Reality Check”, Technology Review, vol. 96, No. 7, Oct. 1993, 9 Pages. |
Shivappa, et al.,' “Person Tracking with Audio-Visual Cues Using the Iterative Decoding Framework”, IEEE Fifth International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance, AVSS 08, Santa Fe, NM, Sep. 2008, 260-267. |
Simeone, et al.,' “Toys++ AR Embodied Agents as Tools to Learn by Building”, Retrieved from <<http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=05572598>>, Jul. 5, 2010, 2 pages. |
Stevens, “Flights into Virtual Reality Treating Real World Disorders”, The Washington Post, Science Psychology, Mar. 27, 1995, 2 Pages. |
Tep, et al.,' “Web Site Quality Evaluation Combining Eyetracking and Physiologicial Measures to Self-Reported Emotions: An Exploratory Research”, Proceedings of Measuring Behavior 2008 (Maastricht, The Netherlands, Aug. 26-29, 2008), Retrieved from: <http://www.noldus.com/mb2008/individual—papers/FPS—eye—tracking/FPS—eye—tracking—Prom-Tep.pdf> on Oct. 4, 2011,Aug. 26, 2008, pp. 224-225. |
Tilley, “E3 09: Project Natal exposed”, Load This [online] Retrieved from the Internet:<URL:http://blogs.canoe.ca/loadthis/general/e3-09-project-natal-exposed/>, Jun. 1, 2009, 4 pages. |
Todd, “Google Campaign Insights: Better Measurement for Display Advertising”, Retrieved from: <http://adwordsagency.blogspot.com/2009/10/campaign-insights-better-measurement.html> on Nov. 14, 2011,Oct. 19, 2009, 3 pages. |
Toyama, et al.,' “Probabilistic Tracking in a Metric Space”, Eighth International Conference on Computer Vision, Vancouver Canada, vol. 2, Jul. 2001, 8 pages. |
Tresadern, et al.,' “Visual Analysis of Articulated Motion”, DPhil Thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K., Oct. 12, 2006, 1-171. |
Vaucelle, et al.,' “Picture This! Film Assembly Using Toy Gestures”, Retrieved from <<http://web.media.mit.ed/˜cati/PictureThis—Ubicomp.pdf>>, 2008, 10 pages. |
Viola, et al.,' “Robust Real-Time Face Detection”, In International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 57, Issue 2, May 2004, 18 pages. |
Voit, et al.,' “Deducing the Visual Focus of Attention from Head Pose Estimation in Dynamic Multi-View Meeting Scenarios”, Proceedings of the 1oth International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, Oct. 20, 2008, 8 pages. |
Walker, et al.,' “Age Related Differences in Movement Control: Adjusting Submovement Structure to Optimize Performance”, Journals of Gerontology, Jan. 1997, pp. 40-52. |
Wedel, et al.,' “Eye Fixations on Advertisements and Memory for Brands: A Model and Findings”, Journal of Marketing Science, vol. 19, Issue 4, Oct. 2000, pp. 297-312. |
Welford, “Signal, Noise, Performance, and Age.”, Human Factors, vol. 23, Issue 1, http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hfes/hf/1981/00000023/00000001/art0009, 1981, pp. 97-109. |
Wilson, et al.,' “Hidden Markov Models for Modeling and Recognizing Gesture Under Variation”, Hidden Markov Model: Applications in Computer Vision., T. Caelli, ed. World Scientific, 2001, 36 pages. |
Wilson, et al.,' “GWindows: Towards Robust Perception-Based UI”, Microsoft Research, 2003, pp. 1-8. |
Wood, “Using Faces: Measuring Emotional Engagement for Early Stage Creative”, In ESOMAR, Best Methodology, Annual Congress, Sep. 19, 2007, 29 pages. |
Worden, et al.,' “Making Computers Easier for Older Adults to Use: Area Cursors and Sticky Icons”, CHI 97, Atlanta Georgia, USA, 1997, pp. 266-271. |
Wren, et al.,' “Pfinder: Real-Time Tracking of the Human Body”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 19, No. 7, Jul. 1997, pp. 780-785. |
Yakut, et al.,' “User and Task Analysis of Multi-Level 3D File Browser”, Dept. of Computer Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey, retrieved from <http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/˜cansin/projects/cs560-3dui/multi-level-3d-file-browser/3dui-report.pdf> on Nov. 15, 2011, 4 pages. |
Yoda, et al.,' “Utilization of Stereo Disparity and Optical Flow Information for Human Interaction”, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision, IEEE Computer Society, Washington D.C., USA, 1998, 5 pages. |
Zhai, et al.,' “The “Silk Cursor”: Investigating Transparency for 3D Target Acquisition”, CHI 94, 1994, pp. 273-279. |
Zhang, “Flexible Camera Calibration by Viewing a Plane from Unknown Orientations”, Microsoft Research, 1999, 8 pages. |
Zhang, “A Flexible New Technique for Camera Calibration”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 22, No. 11, Nov. 2000, pp. 1330-1334. |
Zhang, et al.,' “Head Pose Estimation in Seminar Room Using Multi View Face Detectors”, Proceedings of the 1st International Evaluation Conference on Classification of Events, Activities and Relationships, Mar. 30, 2006, 7 pages. |
Zhao, “Dressed Human Modeling, Detection, and Parts Localization”, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 2001, 121 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,024, Apr. 7, 2014, 12 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/488,046, May 1, 2014, 12 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,180, Mar. 14, 2014, 21 pages. |
“Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,180, Jul. 3, 2014, 3 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,406, Jun. 4, 2014, 14 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/411,859, Aug. 8, 2014, 16 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110159923.8, May 22, 2014, 10 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110159923.8, Sep. 2, 2013, 13 pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/039591, Aug. 1, 2014, 10 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,406, Sep. 6, 2013, 13 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/114,359, Oct. 20, 2014, 7 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,351, Jun. 19, 2014, 23 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/331,886, Jun. 19, 2014, 18 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/363,689, Sep. 15, 2014, 21 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/411,859, Nov. 5, 2014, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,228, Oct. 2, 2014, 18 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/488,046, Jul. 23, 2014, 12 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/439,284, Jul. 21, 2014, 6 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,867, Sep. 30, 2014, 17 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,699, Sep. 17, 2014, 6 pages. |
“Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings”, EP Application No. 12194891.3, Sep. 17, 2014, 7 Pages. |
“Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings”, EP Application No. 12195349.1, Sep. 17, 2014, 7 Pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/114,359, Mar. 23, 2015, 12 pages. |
“Foreign Notice of Allowance”, CN Application No. 201110159923.8, Dec. 2, 2014, 4 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,180, Jan. 15, 2015, 17 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,406, Jan. 21, 2015, 11 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,351, Mar. 25, 2015, 6 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/488,046, Jan. 27, 2015, 13 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,024, Dec. 3, 2014, 14 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/331,886, Jan. 7, 2015, 19 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,351, Nov. 14, 2014, 23 pages. |
“Definition of “Synchronize””, Retrieved from <http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/synchronize?s=t> on Jan. 7, 2015, 4 pages. |
“Definition of “Subscribe””, Retrieved from <http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/subscribe?s=t> on Jan. 7, 2015, 5 pages. |
“Corrected Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,351, Jul. 7, 2015, 3 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 13724078.4, May 13, 2015, 7 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,180, Apr. 24, 2015, 18 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/331,886, Jul. 6, 2015, 20 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/363,689, Apr. 24, 2015, 24 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/411,859, Jun. 3, 2015, 17 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,228, May 21, 2015, 21 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, EP Application No. 13724078.4, Jun. 1, 2015, 1 Page. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,024, Jul. 1, 2015, 18 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140109121 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13309859 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 14108008 | US |