The present invention relates generally to a wireless communication system. More specifically, the present invention relates to a user positioning technique for a multi-platform wireless communication system.
Current mobile satellite communication systems, such as Iridium, Globalstar, and ICO, utilize low-cost user terminals as one of their key system features. To maintain communications linkage with these current mobile systems, the system satellites provide multiple beam and high-gain services to the subscribers. The low-cost and low-gain hand-held terminals utilized by the users of these systems, transmit and receive signals to and from high performance satellites which populate almost the entire hemisphere. Some of these current systems require access to at least two satellites to assure a soft hand-over process as the satellites progress from horizon to horizon. As a result, the satellite system becomes more reliable and available as more satellites come into a user's field of view (FOV). The satellite constellations provided by these current systems are thus sized to guarantee a minimum number of satellites within a user's FOV over large coverage areas at all times.
All of these current mobile satellite communication systems, however, suffer from certain disadvantages. First, they all have limited frequency (the term “frequency” is generalized herein to refer to frequency, time slot or CDMA code) resources. Any given frequency over a given ground position can only be utilized by one user at a time. Thus, if one user accesses a satellite using a particular frequency slot to communicate to his counterpart on network, other satellites and/or users in the same region cannot reuse the same frequency resource in the same local area. In particular, if a nearby secondary user has a handset that requires the same frequency resources as is being utilized by the first user, the second user is unable to access the system, even via different satellites. This is true regardless of the sophistication of the system, including systems that utilize multiple beam satellite designs. Even when multiple satellites are available at a given geographic location, the same frequency spectrum cannot be used by more than one user in a local area. The availability of multiple satellites merely serves to increase the availability of the system to the user. However, the total capacity of these mobile communication satellite systems is still limited by their inefficient usage of the available frequency resources. Thus, the potential growth of these current satellite communication systems is inherently limited.
Additionally, current telecommunications systems generally allow only mobile-to-hub and hub-to-mobile communications in most low earth orbit and medium earth orbit mobile satellite constellations. Mobile-to-mobile linkages require multiple hops between hubs. This means that two or more frequency resources must be committed by the system to close the links.
It is clearly desirable to provide a mobile communication satellite system that relaxes the above constraints, and more efficiently utilizes current mobile satellite communication system resources, while also providing much greater opportunity for system growth.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a wireless communication system with reduced limitations on frequency re-use for point-to-point communications.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a wireless communication system that utilizes individual transponders and mobile terminals that are relatively simple and of low complexity.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a wireless communication system with high system reliability through graceful degradation.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a multi-transponder wireless communication system that allows flexible combination of user types.
It is a related object of the present invention to provide a multi-transponder wireless communication system with better utilization of total system resources.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide a user positioning technique for a multi-platform system that increases the total monetary return.
In accordance with the above and other objects of the present invention, a multi-platform wireless communication system is provided. The wireless communication system includes a plurality of individual communication transponding nodes. The plurality of individual transponding nodes are each in communication with a ground hub such that a signal processed by the ground hub in the forward link is radiated with compensating time delays to one or more of the plurality of individual transponders. The radiated signals are then re-radiated by the plurality of individual transponders and coherently received and processed by a mobile user terminal. The return link signal path is the reverse of the forward link.
In accordance with another object of the present invention, the system includes a plurality of individual transponding nodes. The system also includes a plurality of mobile terminals each associated with a respective remote user. A central hub establishes a link with one or more of the plurality of mobile terminals through one or more of the plurality of transponding nodes. The central hub processes one or more local user signals from one or more of the remote users and synchronizes the one or more local user signals such that an intended user receives all signals synchronously and in phase. The central hub can then determine the position of each of the remote users based on the information stored on the central hub regarding the timing, phase, or frequency of signals in both the forward and return links.
The system further includes a plurality of individual resource cells, each associated with a particular one of the plurality of individual transponding nodes and a particular on e of the plurality of available codes. The system further includes a plurality of mobile terminals of different types, each of which is assigned to operate in one or more of the plurality of individual resource cells.
These and other features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of the invention, when viewed in accordance with the accompanying drawings and appended claims.
Referring now to the figures, the disclosed mobile communication system can be utilized to break away from the frequency spectrum limitation discussed above and provide much more efficient means to re-use the allocated mobile satellite and wireless spectrum multiple times. By eliminating this frequency spectrum limitation on the operation of multiple satellites, the overall capacity of existing mobile satellite and wireless communication systems can more readily expand.
Referring now to
In accordance with the preferred embodiment, the design of the individual satellites 14 can be significantly simplified over those utilized in prior mobile systems because the satellite constellation 14 functions as a sparse radiating array. It is known that the more satellites 16 that are included in a satellite constellation 14, the better the performance the mobile satellite communications system 10 will achieve. Satellites that are simple, small, and provide high performance are preferable. This is because the performance of the system 10 depends more heavily on the satellite constellation 14 than on the individual satellites 16.
In a transmit mode, shown in
As shown in
In accordance with the present invention, the required accuracy of the equivalent path differentials, including all propagation distortion, can be provided using two-way active calibration and R2N (two-way ranging navigation) techniques. An R2N technique is just one technique for obtaining positioning information by which to locate the positioning of the satellites and users precisely using multiple calibration sites and is described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/209,062, entitled “Method and System for Determining a Position of a Transceiver Unit Incorporating Two-Way Ranging Navigation as a Calibration Reference for GPS,” and filed on Dec. 10, 1998. Other known techniques may also be utilized.
The ground telecommunications hub 12 has a processing center 26 that processes each signal and is shown in a transmit mode in FIG. 2. The hub 12 has the capability to address the plurality of satellites 16 individually through the use of antenna spatial discrimination to provide separate signals to different satellites. Alternatively, code identification can also be used to address different satellites independently.
As shown in
Equivalently, the effect of the spatial processing performed by the processing center 26 is to focus signal strength on the user from multiple satellites 16, which act like sparsely separated portions of a large active reflector. Therefore, the processing on the ground will insert different time delays into the signals 24 which are radiated via various paths. The time delays will be inserted into the signals 24 as if the satellites were located on an ellipsoidal surface, of which the two foci are located exactly at the hub 12 and the designated user 18 positions respectively. In low and middle earth orbit constellations, the users 18 and the hub 12 will always be in the near field of the sparse array.
In a receive mode, shown in
As with the forward link geometry, the satellites 16 will amplify the signals 40 received from the users 18 and re-radiate the signals 42 toward the hub 12. The hub 12 can receive signals 42 independently, but simultaneously from the satellites 16, and will add the signals 42 from different satellites coherently in the post-processor 44 as illustrated in FIG. 4.
The signal flows on the block diagram shown in
The technique of the present invention has been demonstrated to significantly reduce the average side lobe levels. It has been determined that this is due to three factors. First, the proposed architecture is not a periodic array, but rather a randomly spaced sparse array, which has no grating lobes. Although the average side lobe level at a single frequency is relatively high, the level decreases with increasing bandwidth. Second, the large sparsely filled array formed by moving satellites is a large extended aperture size. Thus, all of the users on the ground are in the near field of the extended aperture and the wave fronts received by all users are spherical instead of planar. Consequently, dispersion effects become much more pronounced than would be the case in the far field. The dispersion grows very fast as a probe is scanned away from the main beam and the dispersion smears the power distribution very effectively over a finite signal bandwidth. Third, the communication system is preferably designed with a large frequency bandwidth spectrum. The information signal will therefore be spread over this bandwidth via CDMA or through short duration waveforms for TDMA schemes.
The preferred embodiment creates demand for a large number of low cost satellites and also uses R2N techniques to perform satellite and user positioning. The more users using this system, the more accurately the satellite and user positions can be determined. However, even more important than the actual positions of the users and satellites are the path lengths traversed by the signals. Therefore, periodic calibration techniques applied directly to those path lengths may be much simpler and more cost effective. Further, the system also benefits from large percentage bandwidths available with CDMA and TDMA systems.
As shown in
The user terminals 18 receive and transmit signals simultaneously from/to multiple satellites 16 via their broad beam antennas. The user terminals 18 do not require any capability to separately address the individual satellites 16 of the space segment 54. The hub 12 maintains links with each of the satellites 16 in the space segment 54 individually and simultaneously. The hub 12 pre-processes the signals intended for each remote user on transmission and post-processes the signals supplied to each local user on reception to compensate for path differentials. These corrections are separately computed and applied to the signals transmitted to or received from each satellite 16 of the space segment 54 for each user.
Based on the distances from the hub 110, to the various transponders 102, 104 and the distances between the transponders 102, 104 and the intended user 116, the appropriate compensating time delays are calculated and injected into each forward link message at the hub such that the intended user will coherently receive a combined signal from all the transponders as generally indicated at 118. The forward link to the intended user 116 follows the sequence of the hub 110 to the first transponder 102 to the user 116 (hub→trans 1→user 1) and also from the hub 110 to the second transponder 104 to the user 116 (hub→trans 2→user 1). Using the correct time delay on each forward link, all intended signals 112, 114 will arrive at the intended user 116 in phase. Conversely, the same signals intended for the intended user 116 will arrive out of phase at a non-intended user 120 and all other non-intended users in the area. This is shown in
It should be understood that the transponders 102, 104 can be part of any type of wireless communication system or can even be selected from several such systems. For example, while a space based system using satellites is illustrated, regional and national tower-based cellular networks for fixed and mobile communications may also be utilized. Additionally, any high altitude platform system, such as manned/unmanned airships, balloons, or airplanes may also be utilized. Further, while only two transponders are illustrated: an unlimited number of transponders may be utilized. Moreover, while the multiple transponders are shown as being part of a unitary system, any combination of transponders can be used to transmit signals in accordance with the present invention. For example, a signal may be transmitted to a user through both a space-based system and a high altitude platform system. Finally, different sets of transponders may be used to communicate with different users. These various sets may overlap in whole, in part or not at all.
As is known, in conventional CDMA single transponder systems, unique CDMA codes are assigned to each user to avoid interference. Similarly, in multi-transponder systems, when two or more transponders are serving the same geographical location, unique CDMA codes must be used to distinguish the various signals and to avoid interference. For example, as shown in
The various CDMA codes for co-located users can be synchronous or asynchronous. A synchronous orthogonal code gives an advantage of about 15 dB or better over asynchronous CDMA codes. For multiple platforms, it is hard to synchronize CDMA codes among users. Thus, for the disclosed multi-platform system, asynchronous CDMA communication is assumed. Although multiple transponder nodes increase the system availability and total power resource, it under-utilizes the system's full potential, because there are only a finite number of codes available due to the finite bandwidth available to a system. Thus, the total bandwidth limits the number of users the system can serve and the system is unable to fully utilize the power and capacity it was designed to handle.
In the preferred embodiment, the system 100 is an asynchronous CDMA system that utilizes imbedded time delays as described in co-pending patent application Ser. No. 09/550,505, filed Apr. 17, 2000 and entitled “Coherent Synchronization of Code Division Multiple Access Signals,” which is hereby incorporated by reference. In accordance with the preferred system, the signals 112, 114 from each transponder 102, 104 will arrive completely in-phase because appropriate time delays are pre-determined and applied to the signals 112, 114 at the central hub 100, as is shown in FIG. 9. It should be understood that other time delay methods can also be utilized.
As shown, the first user 116 receives signals 112 from each of the transponders 102, 104 using the same code (“code 1”). Similarly, the second user 128 receives signals 114 from each of the transponders 102, 104 using the same code (“code 2”). The central hub 110 determines the time delay between the users and the hub for signals transmitted or received via each transponder and inserts appropriate delays to equalize the total delay via each transponder. Thus, the intended signals from different transponders will all arrive at the intended user in-phase, while non-intended signals will arrive out of phase.
The multi-platform system 100 synchronizes all platforms or transponder nodes 102, 104 in reference to each user 116 of the system. This synchronization process involves techniques and procedures to synchronize at least three parameters, including timing, phase, and frequency of signals in both the forward link and the return link. The bulk of the required processing to accomplish this synchronization is performed at the central hub 110.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment, the results of the synchronization process can be used to assist in a determination of user position. Through this technique, certain data that has been obtained during the normal synchronization operation can be used to provide information about user positioning that will allow the system to operate in a manner that is more profitable and generates additional revenues. This technique can be accomplished without requiring the dedication of additional resources from the space segment 54 or the user segment 56.
Three key parameters that are synchronized by the central hub 110 include timing, phase, and frequency. Further, in accordance with the preferred technique, the following parameters are utilized:
In order to describe the operation of the preferred user positioning method, the user position vector to be determined is assumed to be:
It is assumed that the positions of the platforms 102, 104 are known. Therefore, unknown ranges of the user are determined as follows:
ri2=(x−xpi)2+(y−ypi)2+(z−zpi)2
As discussed above, the synchronization process requires the use of a timing delay of the signal along both the forward and return links. The timing delay parameter is proportional to range, thus, the above set of equations results in np equations with three unknowns: x, y and z. When np is greater than three (3), then there is a larger number of measurements than are needed to determine the unknown user position. If np is less than three, this information is still useful for determining user positions when combined with beam direction information in the case of single platform system.
The frequency parameter information from synchronization can also be used to establish more user positioning information. The frequency measurement is proportional to range rate and is thus related to the unknown user position in accordance with the following equation:
riri=(x−xpi)(x−xpi)+(y−ypi)(y−ypi)+(z−zpi)(z−zpi)
This provides an additional set of equations when it is assumed that the position rate can be determined from a position change with respect to time.
The final synchronization parameter is phase, which also contributes information to user positioning, but in a highly non-linear, modular way. The determined phase is related to range as follows:
phase≈ri mod λ
The parameters derived in the synchronization process of the operation of the multi-platform system 100, are thus used to determine the user position without the need to collect additional data. The preferred method thus tracks the user's position on the system 100 and monitors the time delays for signals transmitted to and received from any user. The system 100 can thus adjust the time delays depending upon the coherency of the signals. For any given user there may be any number of different time delays. Thus, based on the user positioning information, the time delay estimates can be modified. This thus allows for the additional utilization of the information that are already available to increase the profitability of the system.
Having now fully described the invention, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that many changes and modifications can be made thereto without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as set forth herein.
The present application is a continuation-in-part of assignee's co-pending U.S. Ser. No. 09/271,997, entitled “Multiple Satellite Mobile Communications Method and Apparatus for Hand-Held Terminals,” filed on Mar. 18, 1999.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2470787 | Nosker | May 1949 | A |
| 3384891 | Anderson | May 1968 | A |
| 3544995 | Bottenburg et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3720953 | Ajioka | Mar 1973 | A |
| 4161730 | Anderson | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4161734 | Anderson | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4359733 | O'Neill | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4613864 | Hofgen | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4635063 | Chang et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4758959 | Thoone et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4819227 | Rosen | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4897661 | Hiraiwa | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4979170 | Gilhousen et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4994809 | Yung et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5006855 | Braff | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5017927 | Agrawal et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5077562 | Chang et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5099245 | Sagey | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5111209 | Toriyama | May 1992 | A |
| 5126748 | Ames et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5218619 | Dent | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5233626 | Ames | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5278863 | Briskman | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5319673 | Briskman | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5327455 | De Gaudenzi et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5365447 | Dennis | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5379320 | Fernandes et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5387916 | Cohn | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5410314 | Frush et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5423059 | LoGalbo et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5444450 | Olds et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5485485 | Briskman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5525995 | Benner | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5550809 | Bottomley et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5555257 | Dent | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5572216 | Weinberg et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5589834 | Weinberg | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5592471 | Briskman | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5594941 | Dent | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5612701 | Diekelman | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5644572 | Olds et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5739785 | Allison et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5764188 | Ghosh et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5790070 | Natarajan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5839053 | Bosch et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5856804 | Turcotte et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5864579 | Briskman | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5867109 | Wiedeman | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5878034 | Hershey et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5903549 | Von der Embse et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5907813 | Johnson | May 1999 | A |
| 5909460 | Dent | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917447 | Wang et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5918157 | Wiedeman et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5920284 | Victor | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5944770 | Enge et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5945948 | Buford et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5949766 | Ibanez-Meier et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956619 | Gallagher et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5969674 | von der Embse | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5973647 | Barrett et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974039 | Schilling | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6020845 | Weinberg | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028884 | Silberger et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6111542 | Day et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6118824 | Smith et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6119016 | Matusevich | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6138012 | Krutz et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6147658 | Higashi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6151308 | Ibanez-Meier et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6195555 | Dent | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6208626 | Brewer | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6229477 | Chang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6243587 | Dent et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6246363 | Yung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6266533 | Zadeh | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6289211 | Koorapaty | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6295440 | Chang et al. | Sep 2001 | B2 |
| 6298238 | Dai | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6313790 | Chang et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
| 6314269 | Hart et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6337980 | Chang et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6340947 | Chang et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6377208 | Chang et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6388615 | Chang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6480788 | Kilfeather et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6563457 | Chang et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 20020053987 | Chang et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 20010000167 | Chang et al. | Apr 2001 | A1 |
| 20010045903 | Chang et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 335 558 | Apr 1989 | EP |
| 0 682 416 | Nov 1995 | EP |
| 0 749 252 | Dec 1996 | EP |
| 0 776 099 | May 1997 | EP |
| 0 837 568 | Apr 1998 | EP |
| 0 845 874 | Jun 1998 | EP |
| 0 860 708 | Aug 1998 | EP |
| 0 860 709 | Aug 1998 | EP |
| 0 860 710 | Aug 1998 | EP |
| 0 860 952 | Aug 1998 | EP |
| 1 010 988 | Jun 2000 | EP |
| 1 037 403 | Sep 2000 | EP |
| 1 037 403 | Sep 2000 | EP |
| 1 148 662 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1 158 698 | Nov 2001 | EP |
| 2 271 902 | Oct 1993 | GB |
| 2 306 827 | May 1997 | GB |
| 2 349 045 | Oct 2000 | GB |
| 2-28580 | Jan 1990 | JP |
| 3-291584 | Dec 1991 | JP |
| 4-27887 | Jan 1992 | JP |
| 07146995 | Jun 1995 | JP |
| 08015405 | Jan 1996 | JP |
| 09026328 | Jan 1997 | JP |
| 09113600 | May 1997 | JP |
| 10090391 | Apr 1998 | JP |
| 10-209939 | Aug 1998 | JP |
| 11-8579 | Jan 1999 | JP |
| WO 9013186 | Nov 1990 | WO |
| WO 9622661 | Jul 1996 | WO |
| WO 9802762 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| WO 0191310 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 0193458 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 0195522 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09271997 | Mar 1999 | US |
| Child | 09587759 | US |