Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to the processing of data, including digital image data and digital audio data.
Contemporary wireless telephones, commonly known as cell phones, incorporate many new features such as digital cameras. However, the quality of pictures taken using such “camera phones” is compromised by constraints on cost, weight and size driven by consumers' preferences for smaller and lighter devices. Manufacturers can increase picture quality by using higher quality camera components, such as higher quality lenses or detector arrays. However, a manufacturer must either raise the price of its product to cover the higher cost of the higher quality components, or reduce the number of other features to offset increased costs and maintain current pricing, in either case placing the manufacturer at a competitive disadvantage.
Furthermore, regardless of the quality of the picture-taking components included in a camera phone, such components may degrade with time, reducing picture quality. For instance, a camera phone captures images using a detector array such as a charged coupled device (CCD) or a complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) device. A detector element —equivalent to a pixel—may fail or degrade with repeated use, resulting in a dead spot in the captured image data and hence in the rendered image. The user is faced with either accepting lower quality images or purchasing a new camera phone.
A dead or degraded detector element may also be detected as a result of quality checks made during the manufacturing process. Typically, if a detector array includes too many failed or degraded detector elements, it is discarded by the manufacturer. Discarding components that fail quality checks, in particular components that just barely fail to pass, can increase manufacturing costs and hence the price of the product.
Accordingly, a device and/or method that can improve picture quality in devices such as camera phones, but without a commensurate increase in price, weight or size, would be advantageous. A device and/or method that can achieve this advantage and compensate for component degradation over time would have an additional advantage. A device and/or method that can achieve the above and lower discard rates would have a further advantage. Embodiments in accordance with the present invention provide these and other advantages.
In overview, embodiments in accordance with the present invention pertain to handheld devices, such as but not limited to camera phones, that incorporate a graphics processing unit (GPU). In one embodiment, the GPU is used to post-process image data, in order to correct or compensate for loss of picture quality resulting from manufacturing defects, the use of lower-cost components, or the degradation of components over time.
In one embodiment, a first plurality of pixel values, comprising a first frame of image data, is captured using an array of detector elements. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the pixel values are processed by the GPU to identify any unacceptable pixel values, for example, a pixel value that corresponds to an apparently dead or otherwise malfunctioning detector element. Upon identifying an unacceptable pixel value, the GPU determines a new value for that pixel. In one embodiment, the new value is determined by averaging pixel values associated with detector elements that neighbor the dead or malfunctioning detector element.
In one such embodiment, the GPU identifies an unacceptable pixel value by comparing the first plurality of pixel values to a second plurality of pixel values, the second plurality comprising a second frame of image data, where the second frame is the next frame following the first frame in chronological order. If the pixel values corresponding to the same detector element are the same from the first frame to the second frame, then those pixel values are identified as being potentially unacceptable pixel values.
In another such embodiment, the pixel values are compared over successive frames of image data in real time as each new frame of image data is acquired, in a manner similar to that described above. Associated with each detector element is a counter. The counter's value is incremented each time pixel values corresponding to a same detector element are the same over each pair of successive frames. If the counter value exceeds a threshold value, then the pixel values corresponding to that detector element are considered unacceptable. The counter value is reset to zero each time the pixel values corresponding to the same detector element change from one frame to the next frame.
In another embodiment, if a neighborhood of unacceptable pixel values is identified (for example, a group of pixel values associated with adjacent malfunctioning detector elements is identified), then a multi-pass process is used to determine new pixel values. In each pass, at least one new pixel value is determined by averaging other pixel values, and that new pixel value can be used in subsequent passes to determine yet other pixel values. In this manner, a pixel value corresponding to any detector element can be determined, even if that detector element is surrounded only by other dead or malfunctioning detector elements.
In yet another embodiment, during the manufacturing process, for example, the camera phone is calibrated against benchmark images to quantify any effects introduced by variations in the picture-taking components. For example, a flaw in the lens may distort the image data. A correction factor can be determined for each detector element in the array and stored, for example, in a lookup table (LUT). In such an embodiment, the GPU reads the correction factor associated with a detector element from the LUT and applies that correction factor to the pixel value corresponding to that detector element. In this manner, effects such as but not limited to chromatic aberrations and geometric distortions can be corrected in the image data.
In one more embodiment, audio data is corrected to compensate for variations that may be introduced by recording or playback components. For example, during the manufacturing process, variations in amplitude from a defined ideal can be quantified over a range of audio frequencies. Using this information, correction factors as a function of frequency can be stored, for example, in an LUT and then applied by the GPU to the audio data during recording or playback.
In summary, according to embodiments of the present invention, a GPU in a camera phone, audio player, and similar type of device can be used to improve the quality of image or audio data, without commensurately increasing the cost, weight or size of the device. Indeed, using a GPU in this manner may result in a net cost savings, because lower quality, lower cost components can be used without affecting the picture or sound quality. That is, the GPU can compensate for an effect, if any, that may be introduced by a lower quality/cost component, so that overall quality is virtually indistinguishable from that which may have been realized using a higher quality, higher cost component.
Costs can be further reduced by reducing the discard rate of certain components. For example, if during manufacturing a detector array is determined to have some number of defective elements, the array does not necessarily have to be discarded because the GPU can compensate for the defective elements. In essence, the additional capability provided by the GPU means that a greater number of defects in a component such as a detector array can be tolerated. Because the discard rate is lowered, manufacturing costs and ultimately the cost to consumers can be reduced. In a similar vein, the cost to consumers is reduced because a device does not necessarily have to be replaced should, for example, the detector array start to degrade. Instead, the GPU can compensate for any loss of image data introduced by degradation of the detector array. Consequently, a greater number of failed detector elements can be tolerated before the quality of the rendered image is affected, prolonging the life of the device.
These and other objects and advantages of the various embodiments of the present invention will be recognized by those of ordinary skill in the art after reading the following detailed description of the embodiments that are illustrated in the various drawing figures.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
Reference will now be made in detail to the various embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with these embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be understood that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
Some portions of the detailed descriptions that follow are presented in terms of procedures, logic blocks, processing, and other symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. In the present application, a procedure, logic block, process, or the like, is conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps or instructions leading to a desired result. The steps are those utilizing physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, although not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated in a computer system. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as transactions, bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, samples, pixels, or the like.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the present invention, discussions utilizing terms such as “generating,” “storing,” “displaying,” “identifying,” “determining,” “averaging,” “comparing,” “incrementing,” “setting,” “selecting,” “transmitting,” “receiving,” “applying,” “adjusting,” “accessing” or the like, refer to actions and processes (e.g., flowcharts 70, 80 and 90 of
In one embodiment, device 10 is a wireless telephone, or cell phone, that incorporates a digital camera or a digital video recorder. In another embodiment, device 10 is a cell phone incorporating an audio recorder and player (e.g., an MP3 player). In yet another, device 10 is a cell phone that incorporates both a digital camera or a digital video recorder and an audio recorder/player. Device 10 may also be a digital camera or an audio recorder/player. Device 10 may include features or functionality other than that just described. For example, device 10 may also be a video game player console or remote control device.
In an embodiment that includes a cell phone and a digital camera, device 10 includes an image capture device 11 (e.g., a detector or sensor array), which may be a charged coupled device (CCD) imager or a complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) imager. The image capture device 11 may include lenses and other subcomponents.
In the present embodiment, device 10 also includes memory 14 that stores image data before, during and after processing of that data. Memory 14 may include ROM (read-only memory) and Flash memory.
In one embodiment, device 10 also includes a display 13 for displaying the image captured and represented by the image data, and for displaying menus and commands as part of a user interface. The image data may represent a “still” picture. The image data may also represent a video or movie, because a video is essentially a sequence of still images.
As a cell phone, device 10 includes a wireless transmitter 16 and a wireless receiver 17. A user speaks into microphone 18, and the message is converted into a signal that is transmitted via wireless transmitter 16. A message received via wireless receiver 17 is made audible and broadcast to the user via speaker 19. As a cell phone, device 10 may also include a separate digital signal processor 9. Device 10 can include other cell phone components not described herein but known in the art, such as an analog-to-digital converter.
In an embodiment in which device 10 also includes an audio recorder/player, audio files can be stored in memory 14 and made audible using speaker 19.
Device 10 also includes a graphics processing unit (GPU) 12 that includes the hardware, software and/or firmware necessary for implementing the image data and audio data processing methodologies described herein. Optionally, device 10 also includes a central processing unit (CPU) 15 that operates in parallel with GPU 12.
GPU 12, which may also be referred to as a video processing unit or VPU, is a microprocessor that is very efficient at manipulating and rendering graphical images that are of interest in a variety of electronic games and other applications, which are described further below. GPU 12 can be envisioned as a pipeline through which pixel data pass. GPU 12 receives instructions and data (e.g., graphics primitives) from a host, such as a software application. The data are used to define the image to be produced and displayed. The instructions are used to specify the calculations and operations needed to modify the data to produce rendered images.
The specialized nature of GPU 12 makes it more effective than CPU 15 to handle the range of complex processes involved with processing image or audio data. According to embodiments of the present invention, the image (e.g., pixel) or audio data can be inserted into the pipeline of GPU 12, which is provided with instructions on how to process that data. The type of processing performed by GPU 12 is described more fully in conjunction with
In the example of
Counter 37 represents a virtual array of counter values including exemplary counter values 38 and 39. Counter value 38 corresponds to the detector element that corresponds to pixel values 33, 35 and 41, and counter value 39 corresponds to the detector element that corresponds to pixel values 34, 36 and 42.
Consider an example in which pixel values 33 and 35 are not “considered to be equal,” but pixel values 34 and 36 are “considered to be equal.” As used herein, the term “considered to be equal” is used to indicate that the pixel values are either exactly equal, or that they are substantially equal (e.g., within a pre-established tolerance). To simplify the remaining discussion, “equal” is used instead of “considered to be equal.”
In the example of
The process described by the example of
In the example of
Thus, according to embodiments of the present invention, a counter value (e.g., counter value 39) will continue to increase for each new frame of image data acquired, if the pixel values corresponding to that counter value remain the same from one frame to the next. In one embodiment, a threshold value is established, such that if a counter value reaches the threshold value, then the pixel values corresponding to that counter value are considered “unacceptable.” That is, because the pixel values associated with a same detector element have remained the same over the threshold number of successive frames, those pixel values are presumed to be associated with a detector element that has failed and, as such, those pixel values are considered to be erroneous or unacceptable. In this fashion, a failed detector element is identified by noting that the pixel values associated with that detector element have remained the same over a threshold number of successive (chronologically-ordered) frames.
In one embodiment, once a counter value has reached the threshold value, thus identifying a failed detector element, the counter value is reset to zero only if the pixel value changes, and the process described above is then repeated. Consequently, if a detector element is incorrectly identified as a failed element, it will be subsequently be re-identified as a functioning element.
If a detector element is identified as a failed element, then the pixel values associated with that detector element are presumed to be incorrect. According to embodiments of the present invention, a new pixel value for a failed detector element is determined by averaging or interpolating the pixel values associated with the detector elements that surround, neighbor or are adjacent to the failed detector element. Consequently, the effect of a defective detector element is masked in the rendered image.
In one embodiment, the situation exemplified in
In this manner, GPU 12 is able to compensate for defects in the image capture device 11. The defects may be introduced as the image capture device 11 degrades over time. However, because GPU 12 can identify the defects and compensate for them, the life of the device 10 can be extended without a noticeable loss of image quality. That is, once defects begin to occur in the image capture device 11, it is not necessary for a user to either tolerate lower quality images or purchase a new device.
The defects may also be detected in the image capture device 11 in quality checks performed during the manufacturing process. However, because GPU 12 can identify the defects and compensate for them, it may not be necessary to discard image capture device 11. In other words, because GPU 12 can compensate for some number of defects, image capture device 11 can have a greater number of defects than what may normally be tolerated; hence, more devices will pass the quality check. Discard rates are thus reduced, lowering costs.
Continuing with reference to
In the present embodiment, correction factors that compensate for the displacements Δx and Δy are then determined for each detector element. In one embodiment, the correction factors are stored in a lookup table (LUT) that is indexed by detector element—that is, the LUT contains a correction factor for each detector element.
In one embodiment, correction factors are determined for different camera settings (e.g., different focal lengths and aperture settings). In such an embodiment, the LUT is indexed not only by detector element, but by camera setting as well.
In operation, the correction factors can be used as follows. An image is captured (a picture is taken) using device 10 (
In this manner, GPU 12 is able to compensate for distortions and other effects introduced by distortions and flaws that may be present in imaging components such as lenses. Accordingly, lower quality and hence lower cost components can be used, and manufacturing tolerances on components such as lenses can be increased for additional cost savings. The GPU 12 ensures that the resulting overall quality is virtually indistinguishable from higher cost, higher quality components. Furthermore, because components that may previously have been considered unacceptable can now be used, discard rates can be reduced, also reducing costs.
Correction factors that compensate for effects other than distortion effects can be determined and applied in a similar manner, providing advantages such as those described above. For example, the device 10 (
Correction factors can be determined for different camera settings (e.g., different focal lengths and aperture settings). Different correction factors can be determined for each color component of a pixel value (e.g., a correction factor for each of the red, green and blue components). The GPU 12 can post-process color aberrations and color shifts per pixel value.
Correction factors can also be determined to correct effects such as spherical aberration, astigmatism, and coma by applying sharpening filters to selected portions of the image data, dependent on camera settings.
In block 71 of
In block 72, a counter value associated with a same detector element is incremented each time the pixel values that correspond to that same detector element are considered equal over two successive chronologically-ordered frames. That is, for example, if the abovementioned first pixel value and second pixel value are considered equal, then the counter value associated with the detector element that corresponds to the first and second pixel values is incremented.
In block 73, the counter value is set to zero each time pixel values corresponding to the same detector element are considered not equal over two successive chronologically-ordered frames. In the example above, if the first pixel value and the second pixel value are not considered equal, then the counter value associated with the detector element that corresponds to the first and second pixel values is set to zero.
In block 74, if the counter value satisfies a threshold value, then the pixel values associated with that counter value are identified as unacceptable pixels values. In the example, if the counter value associated with the first and second pixels reaches the threshold value, then the first and second pixel values are defined as being unacceptable. Consequently, the detector element corresponding to the first and second pixel values is considered to be dead or malfunctioning.
In block 75, valid pixel values are averaged or interpolated to determine a new value for any unacceptable pixel values. In the example, a subset of the first plurality of pixel values is averaged to determine a new value for the first pixel. Similarly, a subset of the second plurality of pixel values is averaged to determine a new value for the second pixel. The pixel values in each of the subsets correspond to the detector elements that neighbor the detector element associated with the first and second pixel values.
In block 76 of
In block 81 of
In block 82, a correction factor corresponding to the detector element is accessed. In one embodiment, the correction factor is read from an LUT that is indexed by detector element. In another embodiment, the correction factor is determined by comparing the actual performance of device 10 (
In block 83 of
In block 91 of
In block 92, a correction factor corresponding to the frequency is accessed. The correction factor is used to adjust amplitude. In one embodiment, the correction factor is read from an LUT that is indexed by frequency. In another embodiment, the correction factor is determined by comparing the audio performance of device 10 against a benchmark.
In block 93, the correction factor is applied to the instance of audio data. In this manner, the amplitude associated with the instance of audio data is compensated to account for any deviation from an defined ideal amplitude due to shortcomings in the recording of the audio or the playback of the recording.
Although specific steps are disclosed in flowcharts 70, 80 and 90, such steps are exemplary. That is, the present invention is well suited to performing various other steps or variations of the steps recited in flowcharts 70, 80 and 90. It is appreciated that the steps in flowcharts 70, 80 and 90 may be performed in an order different than presented and that the steps in flowcharts 70, 80 and 90 are not necessarily performed in the sequence illustrated.
In summary, according to embodiments of the present invention, a GPU in a camera phone, audio player, and similar type of device can be used to improve the quality of image or audio data, without commensurately increasing the cost, weight or size of the device. Also, the GPU can compensate for any loss of image data introduced by degradation of the image capture device (e.g., the detector array), prolonging the life of the device. In addition, use of a GPU in the manner described herein can reduce discard rates during manufacture. In essence, the additional capability provided by the GPU means that a greater number of defects in a component such as a detector array can be tolerated, and as a result components previously discarded may now be usable. Because the discard rate is lowered, manufacturing costs and ultimately the cost to consumers can be reduced.
Furthermore, the cost of introducing a GPU into a handheld device such as a camera phone is offset because other, lower cost components can be used without affecting the picture or sound quality. That is, the GPU can compensate for an effect, if any, that may be introduced by a lower quality or lower cost component, so that overall quality is not noticeably affected.
Embodiments of the present invention are thus described. While the present invention has been described in particular embodiments, it should be appreciated that the present invention should not be construed as limited by such embodiments, but rather construed according to the below claims.
This Application is a Continuation (Divisional) Application of the commonly-owned U.S. patent application with Ser. No. 11/272,242, filed Nov. 9, 2005, by M. Wloka, and entitled “Using a Graphics Processing Unit to Correct Video and Audio Data,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,750,956, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3904818 | Kovac | Sep 1975 | A |
4253120 | Levine | Feb 1981 | A |
4646251 | Hayes et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4685071 | Lee | Aug 1987 | A |
4739495 | Levine | Apr 1988 | A |
4771470 | Geiser et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4920428 | Lin et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4987496 | Greivenkamp, Jr. | Jan 1991 | A |
5175430 | Enke et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5261029 | Abi-Ezzi et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5305994 | Matsui et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5387983 | Sugiura et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5475430 | Hamada et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5513016 | Inoue | Apr 1996 | A |
5608824 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5652621 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5793433 | Kim et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5878174 | Stewart et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5903273 | Mochizuki et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905530 | Yokota et al. | May 1999 | A |
5995109 | Goel et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6016474 | Kim et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6078331 | Pulli et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6111988 | Horowitz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118547 | Tanioka | Sep 2000 | A |
6141740 | Mahalingaiah et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151457 | Kawamoto | Nov 2000 | A |
6175430 | Ito | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6252611 | Kondo | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256038 | Krishnamurthy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281931 | Tsao et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289103 | Sako et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314493 | Luick | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319682 | Hochman | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323934 | Enomoto | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6392216 | Peng-Tan | May 2002 | B1 |
6396397 | Bos et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6438664 | McGrath et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6486971 | Kawamoto | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6504952 | Takemura et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6584202 | Montag et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594388 | Gindele et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6683643 | Takayama et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6707452 | Veach | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724932 | Ito | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6737625 | Baharav et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6760080 | Moddel et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785814 | Usami et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6806452 | Bos et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6839062 | Aronson et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6856441 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6891543 | Wyatt | May 2005 | B2 |
6900836 | Hamilton, Jr. | May 2005 | B2 |
6950099 | Stollnitz et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7009639 | Une et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7015909 | Morgan, III et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7023479 | Hiramatsu et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7088388 | MacLean et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092018 | Watanabe | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7106368 | Daiku et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7133041 | Kaufman et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7133072 | Harada | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146041 | Takahashi | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7221779 | Kawakami et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7227586 | Finlayson et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7245319 | Enomoto | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7305148 | Spampinato et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7343040 | Chanas et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7486844 | Chang et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7502505 | Malvar et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7580070 | Yanof et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7627193 | Alon et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7671910 | Lee | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7728880 | Hung et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7750956 | Wloka | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7912279 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8049789 | Innocent | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20010001234 | Addy et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010012113 | Yoshizawa et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010012127 | Fukuda et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010015821 | Namizuka et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010019429 | Oteki et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010021278 | Fukuda et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010033410 | Helsel et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010050778 | Fukuda et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010054126 | Fukuda et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020012131 | Oteki et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015111 | Harada | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020018244 | Namizuka et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020027670 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020033887 | Hieda et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020041383 | Lewis, Jr. et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020044778 | Suzuki | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020054374 | Inoue et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020063802 | Gullichsen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020105579 | Levine et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126210 | Shinohara et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020146136 | Carter, Jr. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149683 | Post | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158971 | Daiku et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020167202 | Pfalzgraf | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020167602 | Nguyen | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020191694 | Ohyama et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196470 | Kawamoto et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030035100 | Dimsdale et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030067461 | Fletcher et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030122825 | Kawamoto | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142222 | Hordley | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030146975 | Joung et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030169353 | Keshet et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030169918 | Sogawa | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030197701 | Teodosiadis et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030222995 | Kaplinsky et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030223007 | Takane | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001061 | Stollnitz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040001234 | Curry et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040032516 | Kakarala | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040066970 | Matsugu | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100588 | Hartson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101313 | Akiyama | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109069 | Kaplinsky et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040189875 | Zhai et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040218071 | Chauville et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040247196 | Chanas et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050007378 | Grove | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050007477 | Ahiska | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050030395 | Hattori | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046704 | Kinoshita | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050099418 | Cabral et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050185058 | Sablak | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050238225 | Jo et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243181 | Castello et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050248671 | Schweng | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261849 | Kochi et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050286097 | Hung et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060050158 | Irie | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060061658 | Faulkner et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060087509 | Ebert et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060133697 | Uvarov et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060176375 | Hwang et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060197664 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060274171 | Wang | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060290794 | Bergman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293089 | Herberger et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070091188 | Chen et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070147706 | Sasaki et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070171288 | Inoue et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070236770 | Doherty et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247532 | Sasaki | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070285530 | Kim et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080030587 | Helbing | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080062164 | Bassi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080101690 | Hsu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080143844 | Innocent | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090010539 | Guarnera et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090116750 | Lee et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090160957 | Deng et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090257677 | Cabral et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100266201 | Cabral et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1275870 | Dec 2000 | CN |
0392565 | Oct 1990 | EP |
1449169 | May 2003 | EP |
1378790 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1447977 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1550980 | Jul 2005 | EP |
2045026 | Oct 1980 | GB |
2363018 | May 2001 | GB |
61187467 | Aug 1986 | JP |
62151978 | Jul 1987 | JP |
07015631 | Jan 1995 | JP |
8036640 | Feb 1996 | JP |
08079622 | Mar 1996 | JP |
2001052194 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2002207242 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2003085542 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2004221838 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2005094048 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005182785 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005520442 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2006025005 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006086822 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006094494 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006121612 | May 2006 | JP |
2006134157 | May 2006 | JP |
2007019959 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2007148500 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007233833 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007282158 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2008085388 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008277926 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2009021962 | Jan 2009 | JP |
1020040043156 | May 2004 | KR |
1020060068497 | Jun 2006 | KR |
1020070004202 | Jan 2007 | KR |
03043308 | May 2003 | WO |
2004063989 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2007056459 | May 2007 | WO |
2007093864 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Keith R. Slavin; Application as Filed entitled “Efficient Method for Reducing Noise and Blur in a Composite Still Image From a Rolling Shutter Camera”; U.S. Appl. No. 12/069,669; Filed Feb. 11, 2008. |
Ko et al., “Fast Digital Image Stabilizer Based on Gray-Coded Bit-Plane Matching”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 598-603, Aug. 1999. |
Ko, et al., “Digital Image Stabilizing Algorithms Basd on Bit-Plane Matching”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 617-622, Aug. 1988. |
Krus, M., Bourdot, P., Osorio, A., Guisnel, F., Thibault, G., Adaptive tessellation of connected primitives for interactive walkthroughs in complex industrial virtual environments, Jun. 1999, Proceedings of the Eurographics workshop, pp. 1-10. |
Kumar, S., Manocha, D., Interactive display of large scale trimmed NURBS models, 1994, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Technical Report, p. 1-36. |
Kuno et al. “New Interpolation Method Using Discriminated Color Correlation For Digital Still Cameras” IEEE Transac. On Consumer Electronics, vol. 45, No. 1, Feb. 1999, pp. 259-267. |
Loop, C., DeRose, T., Generalized B-Spline surfaces o arbitrary topology, Aug. 1990, SIGRAPH 90, pp. 347-356. |
M. Halstead, M. Kass, T. DeRose; “efficient, fair interolation using catmull-clark surfaces”; Sep. 1993; Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Proc; pp. 35-44. |
Morimoto et al., “Fast Electronic Digital Image Stabilization for Off-Road Navigation”, Computer Vision Laboratory, Center for Automated Research University of Maryland, Real-Time Imaging, vol. 2, pp. 285-296, 1996. |
Paik et al., “An Adaptive Motion Decision system for Digital Image Stabilizer Based on Edge Pattern Matching”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 607-616, Aug. 1992. |
Parhami, Computer Arithmetic, Oxford University Press, Jun. 2000, pp. 413-418. |
S. Erturk, “Digital Image Stabilization with Sub-Image Phase Correlation Based Global Motion Estimation”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 1320-1325, Nov. 2003. |
S. Erturk, “Real-Time Digital Image Stabilization Using Kalman Filters”, http://www,ideallibrary.com, Real-Time Imaging 8, pp. 317-328, 2002. |
T. DeRose, M., Kass, T. Troung; “subdivision surfaces in character animation”; Jul. 1998; Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Proc; pp. 85-94. |
Uomori et al., “Automatic Image Stabilizing System by Full-Digital Signal Processing”, vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 510-519, Aug. 1990. |
Uomori et al., “Electronic Image Stabiliztion System for Video Cameras and VCRS”, J. Soc. Motion Pict. Telev. Eng., vol. 101, pp. 66-75, 1992. |
“A Pipelined Architecture for Real-Time orrection of Barrel Distortion in Wide-Angle Camera Images”, Hau, T. Ngo, Student Member, IEEE and Vijayan K. Asari, Senior Member IEEE, IEEE Transaction on Circuits and Sytstems for Video Technology: vol. 15 No. 3 Mar. 2005 pp. 436-444. |
“Calibration and removal of lateral chromatic abberation in images” Mallon, et al. Science Direct Copyright 2006; 11 pages. |
“Method of Color Interpolation in a Singe Sensor Color Camera Using Green Channel Seperation” Weerasighe, et al Visual Information Processing Lab, Motorola Austrailian Research Center pp. IV-3233-IV3236, 2002. |
D. Doo, M. Sabin “Behaviour of recrusive division surfaces near extraordinary points”; Sep. 197; Computer Aided Design; vol. 10, pp. 356-360. |
D.W.H. Doo; “A subdivision algorithm for smoothing down irregular shaped polyhedrons”; 1978; Interactive Techniques in Computer Aided Design; pp. 157-165. |
Davis, J., Marschner, S., Garr, M., Levoy, M., Filling holes in complex surfaces using volumetric diffusion, Dec. 2001, Stanford University, pp. 1-9. |
Donald D. Spencer, “Illustrated Computer Graphics Dictionary”, 1993, Camelot Publishing Company, p. 272. |
Duca et al., “A Relational Debugging Engine for Graphics Pipeline, International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques”, ACm SIGGRAPH Jul. 2005, pp. 453-463. |
E. Catmull, J. Clark, “recursively enerated B-Spline surfaces on arbitrary topological meshes”; Nov. 1978; Computer aided design; vol. 10; pp. 350-355. |
gDEBugger, graphicRemedy, http://www.gremedy.com, Aug. 8, 2006, pp. 1-18. |
J. Bolz, P. Schroder; “rapid evaluation of catmull-clark subdivision surfaces”; Web 3D '02. |
J. Stam; “Exact Evaluation of Catmull-clark subdivision surfaces at arbitrary parameter values”; Jul. 1998; Computer Graphics; vol. 32; pp. 395-404. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100171845 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11272242 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 12651372 | US |