Using a graphics system to enable a multi-user computer system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8893016
  • Patent Number
    8,893,016
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 10, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 18, 2014
    9 years ago
Abstract
A graphics system and a multi-user computer system are disclosed. The graphics system comprises a graphics processing unit (GPU) for processing pixels. It further includes a multi-user manager for allocating pixel processing capability for each one of a plurality of users, wherein each user uses a display and an input device. Moreover, the graphics system has a plurality of user attributes for each user. The multi-user computer system comprises a central processing unit (CPU) and a disk drive configured to support a plurality of users. Further, the multi-user computer system includes the graphics system.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to computer system architectures. More particularly, embodiments of the present invention relate to using a graphics system to enable a multi-user computer system.


2. Related Art


Technological advances have significantly improved the performance of the computer system. However, there is a limit to the improvement in performance solely from technological advances. In the past, the computer system was mostly a productivity tool. Now, the computer system is evolving into both a digital entertainment tool and a productivity tool.


The traditional architecture of the computer system envisions a single user. If the computer system is configured with greater processing power (e.g., by increasing the number of processors), greater storage capacity (e.g., by increasing the size of the hard drive), and greater network communication capacity (e.g., by increasing network communication bandwidth), the typical single user underutilizes the resources of the computer system. Thus, the typical single user is not willing to pay the additional premium associated with scaling the traditional architecture.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A graphics system and a multi-user computer system are disclosed. The graphics system comprises a graphics processing unit (GPU) for processing pixels. It further includes a multi-user manager for allocating pixel processing capability for each one of a plurality of users, wherein each user uses a display and an input device. Moreover, the graphics system has a plurality of user attributes for each user.


The multi-user computer system comprises a central processing unit (CPU) and a disk drive configured to support a plurality of users. Further, the multi-user computer system includes the graphics system.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 1 illustrates a multi-user computer system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 illustrates allocation of pixel processing capability of a graphics system for each user in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 illustrates a flow chart showing a method of supporting an additional user in a multi-user computer system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention.



FIG. 1 illustrates a multi-user computer system 100 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The traditional computer system is transformed from an underutilized single user computer system into an extensively utilized multi-user computer system 100. It should be understood that the multi-user computer system 100 may have other configurations.


As depicted in FIG. 1, the multi-user computer system 100 concurrently supports four different users (e.g., user 1, user 2, user 3, and user 4). It should be understood that the multi-user computer system 100 may be configured to support other number of users. Each user operates a respective display (e.g., display 1, display 2, display 3, and display 4) and a respective input device (e.g., input device 1, input device 2, input device 3, and input device 4). The displays (e.g., display 1, display 2, display 3, and display 4) may have different display sizes. The display and input device may be integrated or separate. Examples of integrated display and input device include a PDA (personal digital assistant) and a cell phone.


Each user is connected via a wired or wireless network connection (e.g., network connection 1, network connection 2, network connection 3, and network connection 4) to the multi-user computer system 100. In practice, the users share the resources of the multi-user computer system 100. Moreover, the multi-user computer system 100 provides computational processing, storage, network communication, and graphical/pixel processing services to the users. For example, graphics-intensive processing applications may be executed at the multi-user computer system 100 and then displayed and interacted with on the PDA and the cell phone.


As shown in FIG. 1, the multi-user computer system 100 includes a central processing unit 10, a northbridge unit 20, a southbridge unit 30, a main memory 40, and a disk drive 50. Further, the multi-user computer system 100 has a graphics system 60.


The graphics system 60 includes a graphics processing unit (GPU) 62, a multi-user manager 64, and user attributes (e.g., user 1 attributes, user 2 attributes, user 3 attributes, and user 4 attributes) for each user. The user attributes include the display size of the display used by each user. The GPU 62 is a semiconductor device that specializes in rapidly processing graphical or pixel data compared to a typical central processing unit (CPU) 10. The GPU 62 may also be utilized for general purpose processing tasks typically performed by the CPU 10. The graphics system 60 may also have multiple GPUs 62. Further, additional GPUs 62 may be added to the graphics system 60 in any one of numerous ways. For example, a module (e.g., graphics card) having a single GPU or multiple GPUs may be coupled to the graphics system 60. Moreover, multiple modules (e.g., graphics cards) having a single GPU or multiple GPUs may be coupled to the graphics system 60. Further, the GPU 62 may have one or multiple cores for graphical data processing.


The multi-user manager 64 receives requests for the multi-user computer system 100 to support additional users. The multi-user manager 64 decides whether to accept the request. If the multi-user manager 64 accepts the request, the multi-user manager allocates pixel processing capability for the additional user and creates user attributes for the additional user. FIG. 2 illustrates allocation of pixel processing capability of the graphics system 60 for each user (e.g., user 1, user 2, user 3, and user 4) in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 2, allocation of pixel processing capability is dependent on the needs of the user. As the display size of the user increases, a larger allocation of pixel processing capability is required for the user.


Referring again to FIG. 1, the disk drive 50 is partitioned into sections for each user (e.g., user 1, user 2, user 3, and user 4). Further, the disk drive 50 includes a section for shared resources available to all users. If an additional user is accepted, the multi-user computer system 100 is configured to support the additional user. This configuration includes creating a section for the additional user in the disk drive 50.



FIG. 3 illustrates a flow chart showing a method 300 of supporting an additional user in a multi-user computer system 100 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Reference is made to FIGS. 1 and 2,


At Block 310, the graphics system 60 of the multi-user computer system 100 is requested to support an additional user. In particular, the multi-user manager 64 receives the request to support the additional user. Moreover, the multi-user manager 64 decides whether to accept the request.


Continuing, at Block 320, pixel processing capability is allocated for the additional user if the graphics system 60 accepts the request. Allocation of pixel processing capability is depicted in FIG. 2.


In an embodiment, the request may include proof of an additional license for the additional user to use the graphics system. In another embodiment, the request may include an authorization key obtained after payment of a fee. In yet another embodiment, the request may include payment for supporting the additional user.


Further, at Block 330, the multi-user computer system 100 is configured to support the additional user. This configuration includes creating a section for the additional user in the disk drive 50 of the multi-user computer system 100.


In sum, a seamless experience for multiple users is created at a reduced cost and without a cumbersome process.


The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the Claims appended hereto and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus comprising: A plurality of systems including a graphics system, wherein said graphics system is configured to grant or to deny access by a user to said plurality of systems,Wherein said graphics system includes: a communication link;a graphics processing unit (GPU) for processing pixels, wherein said GPU is located in said graphics system;a pixel processing capability property of said graphics system allocated by a multi-user manager instead of an accepted user into a plurality of pixel processing capability allocations;said multi-user manager operable to decide whether to accept a user to access services available and operable to allocate an appropriate portion of said pixel processing capability property to each accepted user upon said user being accepted, wherein each allocation of said pixel processing capability property is exclusive to a respective accepted user, wherein said services available include computational processing, storage, network communication, and pixel processing, wherein said multi-user manager is located in said graphics system; anda plurality of user attributes for each accepted user, wherein said multi-user manager creates said user attributes for each accepted user, wherein said multi-user manager creates said user attributes upon said user being accepted, and wherein said user attributes are located in said graphics system, wherein each accepted user operates a respective display and a respective input device, and wherein said user attributes include display size of each accepted user.
  • 2. The apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein said multi-user manager receives a request to support an additional user.
  • 3. The apparatus as recited in claim 2 wherein if said multi-user manager accepts said request, said multi-user manager allocates an appropriate portion of said pixel processing capability property to said additional accepted user.
  • 4. The apparatus as recited in claim 2 wherein said request includes proof of an additional license.
  • 5. The apparatus as recited in claim 3 wherein said request includes an authorization key.
  • 6. The apparatus as recited in claim 2 wherein said request includes payment for supporting said additional user.
  • 7. A multi-user computer system comprising: a processing system, wherein said processing system includes a central processing unit (CPU);a storage system, wherein said storage system includes a disk drive partitioned into a shared portion for resources available to accepted users and at least one section, wherein each section is exclusive to an accepted user;a graphics system, wherein said graphics system is configured to grant or to deny access by a user to said processing, storage, and graphics systems; wherein said graphics system comprises: a graphics processing unit (GPU) for processing pixels, wherein said GPU is located in said graphics system;a pixel processing capability property of said graphics system allocated by a multi-user manager instead of said accepted user into a plurality of pixel processing capability allocations;said multi-user manager operable to decide whether to accept a user to access services available from said multi-user computer system and operable to allocate an appropriate portion of said pixel processing capability property to each accepted user upon said user being accepted, wherein each allocation of said pixel processing capability property is exclusive to a respective accepted user, wherein said services available include computational processing, storage, network communication, and pixel processing, wherein said multi-user manager is located in said graphics system; anda Plurality of user attributes for each accepted user, wherein said multi-user manger creates said user attributes upon said user being accepted, and wherein said user attributes are located in said graphics system, wherein each accepted user operates a respective display and a respective input device, and wherein said user attributes include display size of each accepted user.
  • 8. The multi-user computer system as recited in claim 7, wherein said multi-user manager receives a request to support an additional user in said multi-user computer system.
  • 9. The multi-user computer system as recited in claim 8 wherein if said multi-user manager accepts said request, said multi-user manager allocates an appropriate portion of said pixel processing capability property to said additional accepted user.
  • 10. The multi-user computer system as recited in claim 8 wherein said request includes proof of an additional license.
  • 11. The multi-user computer system as recited in claim 9 wherein said request includes an authorization key.
  • 12. The multi-user computer system as recited in claim 8 wherein said request includes payment for supporting said additional user.
  • 13. A method of supporting an additional user in a multi-user computer system, said method comprising: providing a plurality of systems including a graphics system, a processing system, and a storage system; andusing said graphics system to grant or to deny access by the additional user to said plurality of systems;Wherein said using said graphics system includes: requesting said graphics system of said multi-user computer system to support said additional user in said multi-user computer system, wherein said graphics system comprises a pixel processing capability property of said graphics system allocated by a multi-user manager instead of an accepted user into a plurality of pixel processing capability allocations, wherein said graphics system includes said multi user manager for receiving said request to support said additional user in said multi-user computer system, wherein said multi-user manager is located in said graphics system;upon said graphics system accepting said request, allocating an appropriate portion of said pixel processing capability property exclusively to said additional accepted user and creating user attributes for said additional accepted user to access services available from said multi-user computer system, wherein said services available include computational processing, storage, network communication, and pixel processing, wherein each accepted user operates a respective display and a respective input device.
  • 14. The method as recited in claim 13 wherein said user attributes include a display size of said additional accepted user.
  • 15. The method as recited in claim 14 wherein said multi-user manager decides whether to accept said additional user.
  • 16. The method as recited in claim 13 wherein said request includes proof of an additional license.
  • 17. The method as recited in claim 13 wherein said request includes an authorization key.
  • 18. The method as recited in claim 13 wherein said request includes payment for supporting said additional user.
US Referenced Citations (74)
Number Name Date Kind
5251295 Ikenoue et al. Oct 1993 A
5485559 Sakaibara et al. Jan 1996 A
5781747 Smith et al. Jul 1998 A
5794016 Kelleher Aug 1998 A
5956046 Kehlet et al. Sep 1999 A
6028586 Swan et al. Feb 2000 A
6044215 Charles et al. Mar 2000 A
6141021 Bickford et al. Oct 2000 A
6206087 Nakase et al. Mar 2001 B1
6282596 Bealkowski et al. Aug 2001 B1
6304952 Suzuoki Oct 2001 B1
6331856 Van Hook et al. Dec 2001 B1
6359624 Kunimatsu Mar 2002 B1
6397343 Williams et al. May 2002 B1
6473086 Morein et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476816 Deming et al. Nov 2002 B1
6496187 Deering et al. Dec 2002 B1
6535216 Deming et al. Mar 2003 B1
6630936 Langendorf Oct 2003 B1
6631474 Cai et al. Oct 2003 B1
6654826 Cho et al. Nov 2003 B1
6670958 Aleksic et al. Dec 2003 B1
6700586 Demers Mar 2004 B1
6704021 Rogers et al. Mar 2004 B1
6708217 Colson et al. Mar 2004 B1
6711691 Howard et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714200 Talnykin et al. Mar 2004 B1
6772265 Baweja et al. Aug 2004 B2
6798420 Xie Sep 2004 B1
6832269 Huang et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835070 Law Dec 2004 B1
6864891 Myers Mar 2005 B2
6914779 Askeland et al. Jul 2005 B2
6919894 Emmot et al. Jul 2005 B2
6937245 Van Hook et al. Aug 2005 B1
6956579 Diard et al. Oct 2005 B1
6985152 Rubinstein et al. Jan 2006 B2
7019752 Paquette et al. Mar 2006 B1
7024510 Olarig Apr 2006 B2
7058829 Hamilton Jun 2006 B2
7079149 Main et al. Jul 2006 B2
7080181 Wolford Jul 2006 B2
7119808 Gonzalez et al. Oct 2006 B2
7203909 Horvitz et al. Apr 2007 B1
7260839 Karasaki Aug 2007 B2
7321367 Isakovic et al. Jan 2008 B2
7634668 White et al. Dec 2009 B2
7663633 Diamond et al. Feb 2010 B1
20020073247 Baweja et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020107809 Biddle et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020130889 Blythe et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020141152 Pokharna et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020180725 Simmonds et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030067470 Main et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030193503 Seminatore et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030233391 Crawford, Jr. et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040008200 Naegle et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040021678 Ullah et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040032861 Lee Feb 2004 A1
20040039954 White et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040103191 Larsson May 2004 A1
20040125111 Tang-Petersen et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040189677 Amann et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050028015 Asano et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050088445 Gonzalez et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050144452 Lynch et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050190190 Diard et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050190536 Anderson et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050270298 Thieret Dec 2005 A1
20060107250 Tarditi, Jr. et al. May 2006 A1
20060161753 Aschoff et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060168230 Caccavale et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060176881 Ma et al. Aug 2006 A1
20080084419 Bakalash et al. Apr 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
1020050047243 May 2005 KR
421752 Feb 2001 TW
485309 May 2002 TW
591400 Jun 2004 TW
200422936 Nov 2004 TW
I223752 Nov 2004 TW
200501046 Jan 2005 TW
2005010854 Feb 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (12)
Entry
Luke E J et al Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: “Semotus Visum: a flexible remote visualitzation framework” VIS 2002. IEEE Visualization 2002. Proceedings. Boston, MA, Oct. 27-Nov. 1, 2002, Annual IEEE conference on visualization, New York, NY: IEEE, US, Oct. 27, 2010, pp. 61-68, XP010633279.
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=339936.
Luke E J et al Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: “Semotus Visum: a flexible remote visualitzation framework” VIS 2002. IEEE Visualization 2002. Proceedings. Boston, MA, Oct. 27-Nov. 1, 2002, Annual IEEE conference on visualization, New York, NY: IEEE, US, Oct. 27, 2002, pp. 61-68, XP010633279 ISBN: 0-7803-7498-3.
Luke E J et al Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: “Semotus Visum: a flexible remote visualization framework” VIS 2002. IEEE Visualization 2002. Proceedings. Boston, MA, Oct. 27-Nov. 1, 2002, Annual IEEE conference on visualization, New York, NY; IEEE, Oct. 27, 2002, pp. 61-68 XP010633279 ISBN: 0-7803-7498-3.
Luke, E. J. et al., “Semotus Visum: a flexible remote visualization framework”, IEEE Visualization 2002, Oct. 27-Nov. 1, 2002, Boston, MA, pp. 61-68.
Casera, S. et al., “A Collaborative Extension of a Visualization System”, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Distributed Frameworks for Multimedia Applications (DFMA'05), Feb. 6-9, 2005, Besoncon, France, pp. 176-182.
Stegmaier, S. et al., “Widening the Remote Visualization Bottleneck”, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis 2003, Sep. 18-20, 2003, Rome, Italy, vol. 1 No. 18, pp. 174-179.
Miller, J. R., “The Remote Application Controller”, Computer and Graphics, Pergamon Press Ltd, Oxford, Great Britain, vol. 27 No. 4, Aug. 2003, pp. 605-615.
Bhatt, Ajay V., “Creating a PCI Interconnect”, 2002.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/523,084 of Bakalash et al. (2008/0084419), Nov. 19, 2003.
Rupley, Sebastian, “Intel Developer Forum to Spotlight PCI Express,” PC Magazine dated Sep. 2002.
http://www.informit.com/article.aspx?p=339936, Oct. 22, 2004.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060282781 A1 Dec 2006 US