This description relates to identifying images associated with particular subjects and that may be of interest to end viewers. By employing attributes to represent individual images, the images can be efficiently analyzed to identify appropriate images for selection and presentation.
Proportional to the astronomical growth of imagery presented over the Internet, the demand for such content has grown. Online viewers have grown accustomed to being presented a large variety of imagery when reviewing products, services, etc. While professionally prepared imagery is used to present viewers with such visuals, nonprofessionally prepared imagery is also used for presentation.
The systems and techniques described can aid individuals such as designers (e.g., website designers), marketers (e.g., marketing particular brand product, services, etc.), etc. with selecting imagery for presentation to viewers (e.g., end users, potential purchasers, etc.). Employing machine learning techniques, imagery can be identified that is likely to resonate with viewers (e.g., end users). By training a machine learning system with images and image types that have previously demonstrated positive performance (e.g., attracted attention from users, received commentary on social networks, transaction generation, etc.), similarly good performing images can be identified for particular products, services, brands, etc. of interest. Once identified, images can be selected for presenting to end users (e.g., inserted into websites, webpages, etc.). Further, the presented images can be monitored (e.g., for user interaction, transactions, etc.) to collect feedback to continue training of the machine learning system and further improve predicting image performance.
In one aspect, a computing device implemented method includes determining a ranking of images using a machine learning system. The machine learning system is trained using attributes that represent each of a plurality of training images. The attributes include imagery attributes, social network attributes, and textual attributes. The method also includes producing a listing of the ranked images for selecting one or more of the ranked images for a brand entity associated with the selected ranked images.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The method may also include further training of the machine learning system using data associated with the ranked images. The data associated with the ranked images may represent user interactions with a subset of the ranked images. The data associated with the ranked images may present transactions with a subset of the ranked images. The imagery attributes may represent one or more colors included in a corresponding image of the plurality of training images. The textual attributes may represent a count of words present in a corresponding image of the plurality of training images. The textual attributes may represent a count of characters present in a corresponding image of the plurality of training images. The social network attributes may include a count of positive indications from social network users. The social network attributes may include a count of topic-identifying text. The attributes may represent the geographical source of a corresponding image of the plurality of training images. The attributes may represents wearable items present in a corresponding image of the plurality of training images.
In another aspect, a system includes a computing device that includes a memory configured to store instructions. The system also includes a processor to execute the instructions to perform operations that include determining a ranking of images using a machine learning system. The machine learning system is trained using attributes that represent each of a plurality of training images. The attributes include imagery attributes, social network attributes, and textual attributes. Operations also include producing a listing of the ranked images for selecting one or more of the ranked images for a brand entity associated with the selected ranked images.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The operations may also include further training of the machine learning system using data associated with the ranked images. The data associated with the ranked images may represent user interactions with a subset of the ranked images. The data associated with the ranked images may present transactions with a subset of the ranked images. The imagery attributes may represent one or more colors included in a corresponding image of the plurality of training images. The textual attributes may represent a count of words present in a corresponding image of the plurality of training images. The textual attributes may represent a count of characters present in a corresponding image of the plurality of training images. The social network attributes may include a count of positive indications from social network users. The social network attributes may include a count of topic-identifying text. The attributes may represent the geographical source of a corresponding image of the plurality of training images. The attributes may represents wearable items present in a corresponding image of the plurality of training images.
In another aspect, one or more computer readable media store instructions that are executable by a processing device, and upon such execution cause the processing device to perform operations including determining a ranking of images using a machine learning system. The machine learning system is trained using attributes that represent each of a plurality of training images. The attributes including imagery attributes, social network attributes, and textual attributes. Operations also include producing a listing of the ranked images for selecting one or more of the ranked images for a brand entity associated with the selected ranked images.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The operations may also include further training of the machine learning system using data associated with the ranked images. The data associated with the ranked images may represent user interactions with a subset of the ranked images. The data associated with the ranked images may present transactions with a subset of the ranked images. The imagery attributes may represent one or more colors included in a corresponding image of the plurality of training images. The textual attributes may represent a count of words present in a corresponding image of the plurality of training images. The textual attributes may represent a count of characters present in a corresponding image of the plurality of training images. The social network attributes may include a count of positive indications from social network users. The social network attributes may include a count of topic-identifying text. The attributes may represent the geographical source of a corresponding image of the plurality of training images. The attributes may represents wearable items present in a corresponding image of the plurality of training images.
These and other aspects, features, and various combinations may be expressed as methods, apparatus, systems, means for performing functions, program products, etc.
Other features and advantages will be apparent from the description and the claims.
Referring to
Referring to
In one arrangement, computational techniques are employed for a number of tasks; for example, imagery may be collected and appropriately filtered to remove unwanted content (e.g., filter out off-brand imagery and retain imagery relevant to the brand). Computational tasks may also include forming an association between the retained imagery and brands. For example, products and images of the products may be associated. Context may be added to the imagery (e.g., insert keywords into images) to form an association between a product, service, etc. with an image. Computational techniques can also be employed for ranking imagery to predict which images may be top-performers and should be provided to brand owners, band marketers, etc., for presentation (e.g., have predicted top-performing images inserted into websites, etc.).
As presented in the figure, a computer system 200 executes an operating system 202 and a browser 204 to present brand-related imagery (e.g., images of brand products, services, etc.) for user interaction (e.g., viewing, selecting, purchasing, etc.). In this particular example, a series of images 208 are presented on the display 206 that are associated with footwear of one or more brands. Computational techniques collect and filter imagery from one or more sources (e.g., social network sites) to identify an appropriate set of relevant images (e.g., on-brand images). Upon being identified, products, services, etc. are associated with these images (e.g., each image is tagged with a corresponding footwear type represented in the image) and the associations are stored for later use. Once the imagery has been curated and tagged, one or more computational techniques can be employed to predict which images are likely to perform well when presented to viewers. For example, after identifying hundreds of images and providing context (e.g., associating a keyword with each image), the images may be ranked to identify potential top performers. Once identified, these top performers (e.g., the ten images included in the series of images 208) may be selected for presentation.
Referring to
To perform operations, the image manager 316 may employ one or more computational techniques; for example, one or more machine learning techniques may be used. Through such machine learning techniques, the image manager 316 uses artificial intelligence to automatically learn and improve from experience without being explicitly programmed. Once trained (e.g., from known imagery), one or more images, representation of images, etc. can be input into the image manager 316 to yield an output. By providing the output back (e.g., feedback), the machine learning technique can use the output as additional training information. Along with using increased amounts of training data (e.g., image representations), feedback data (e.g., output image representations) can increase result accuracy (e.g., predicting top performing images).
Other forms of artificial intelligence techniques may be used by the image manager 316 along with the network architecture 300. For example, to process information (e.g., images, image representations, etc.) to prepare image recommendations, etc., the architecture may employ one or more knowledge-based systems such as an expert system. In general, such expert systems are designed solving relatively complex problems by using reasoning techniques that may employ conditional statements (e.g., if-then rules). In some arrangements such expert systems may use multiple systems such as a two sub-system design, in which one system component stores structured and/or unstructured information (e.g., a knowledge base) and a second system component applies rules, etc. to the stored information (e.g., an inference engine) to determine results of interest (e.g., font recommendations).
Referring to
Referring to
Imagery may also be provided from other sources; for example, social networks (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.) often present imagery (e.g., in posts, messages, etc.) associated with a brand (e.g., products, services, etc.). By monitoring such networks (e.g., using software agents, etc.), images may be collected and potentially used as training data 506. Additionally, such imagery can be collected for use as input 502 to the image machine learning system 408, once the system has been initially trained. Such imagery may be professionally prepared; however, imagery created by end users (e.g., product users) can be more visually inviting and may attract more interactions from potential purchasers than other types of imagery (e.g., professionally prepared product images).
To provide such training data 506 to the image machine learning system 408, one or more techniques may be employed; for example, data that represents each image can be provided. For example, images of brand product images that have evoked heavy end user interactions can be represented by a collection of attributes in which each attribute reflects a particular aspect of the respective image. In some arrangements, some attributes can be categorized; for example, one attribute category can be associated with visual characteristics of images (e.g., color, resolution, etc.) while another may be associated with the source of images (e.g., geographical capture location of an image) while still another category may include social network attributes (e.g., social network source, viewer reactions to image, etc.). Attributes can also be characterized for reflecting textual content included in the imagery; for example, the amount of text and type of text can affect how an end user may react to an image. Textual content may assist generating interest in some brand products while textual content of other brands, brand products, etc. may be a detriment to attracting notice from end users.
Once initially trained, input 502 may be provided to the image machine learning system 408 to generate output 504. For example, further imagery (e.g., a group of images) may be collected, created, etc. and input to identify the particular images that may be of interest to a brand marketer based upon the data used to train the learning system (e.g., data, images, etc. that reflect positively with end users). As such, the image machine learning system 408 can predict images that should perform well with end users. Additionally, the predicted images can be used to further train the machine learning system and improve predictive accuracy, for example, based on more contemporary data that reflects desired performance with end users. As illustrated in the figure, feedback data 508 can be provided to the image machine learning system 408 to further the training. Recently used images that have performed well can be represented (e.g., in attributes) and provided to the image machine learning system 408. Interaction data such as data that represents user interacting with recently presented images (e.g., click data indicating users selecting images, data indicating users have hovered a pointing device on the image, etc.), data that represents users executing transactions based upon recently presented images (e.g., initiating the purchase of a brand product, service, etc.), etc. Along with providing the feedback data 508 to the image machine learning system 408 to improve accuracy, the feedback data can be stored (e.g., at the storage device of the content director 302) for later retrieval and further processing (e.g., training other machine learning systems, attribute adjustments, etc.).
To implement the image machine learning system 408, one or more machine learning techniques may be employed. For example, supervised learning techniques may be implemented in which training is based on a desired output that is known for an input. Supervised learning can be considered an attempt to map inputs to outputs and then estimate outputs for previously unseen inputs (a newly introduced input). Unsupervised learning techniques may also be employed in which training is provided from known inputs but unknown outputs. Reinforcement learning techniques may also be used in which the system can be considered as learning from consequences of actions taken (e.g., inputs values are known and feedback provides a performance measure). In some arrangements, the implemented technique may employ two or more of these methodologies.
In some arrangements, neural network techniques may be implemented using the data representing the images (e.g., a vector of numerical values to represent each attribute, etc.) to invoke training algorithms for automatically learning the images and related information. Such neural networks typically employ a number of layers. Once the layers and number of units for each layer is defined, weights and thresholds of the neural network are typically set to minimize the prediction error through training of the network. Such techniques for minimizing error can be considered as fitting a model (represented by the network) to training data. By using the image data (e.g., attribute vectors), a function may be defined that quantifies error (e.g., a squared error function used in regression techniques). By minimizing error, a neural network may be developed that is capable of determining attributes for an input image. Other factors may also be accounted for during neutral network development. For example, a model may too closely attempt to fit data (e.g., fitting a curve to the extent that the modeling of an overall function is degraded). Such overfitting of a neural network may occur during the model training and one or more techniques may be implements to reduce its effects.
One type of machine learning referred to as deep learning may be utilized in which a set of algorithms attempt to model high-level abstractions in data by using model architectures, with complex structures or otherwise, composed of multiple non-linear transformations. Such deep learning techniques can be considered as being based on learning representations of data. In general, deep learning techniques can be considered as using a cascade of many layers of nonlinear processing units for feature extraction and transformation. The next layer uses the output from the previous layer as input. The algorithms may be supervised, unsupervised, combinations of supervised and unsupervised, etc. The techniques are based on the learning of multiple levels of features or representations of the data (e.g., image attributes). As such multiple layers of nonlinear processing units along with supervised or unsupervised learning of representations can be employed at each layer, with the layers forming a hierarchy from low-level to high-level features. By employing such layers, a number of parameterized transformations are used as data propagates from the input layer to the output layer.
Referring to
Attributes can also represent particular types of products, services, etc. that are represented in the respective image. For example, an attribute may represent the probability that footwear, jewelry, etc. is present in the image. Information associated with social networks is also representable by attributes; for example, tagged textual content such as hashtags can be reflected in one or more attributes. In some arrangements, attributes can reflect the similarity of hashtags present in an image caption, the number of hashtags present in an image caption, etc. Attributes associated with hashtags can reflect the frequency of one or more particular hashtags appearing in a caption, the frequency of a hashtags based upon the occurrence of in particular social network applications (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, etc.). The similarity of hashtags (present in a caption) compared to hashtags identified as popular can be reflected in an attribute along with the language of a hashtag. Other types of information may also be the subject of one or more attributes; for example, an identifier of an individual (e.g., a previously known customer) may be represented along with the geographical location of the image, where the image was captured, etc. By assigning a numerical value or other data type (e.g., a Boolean value) to each of the thirty-eight attributes shown in chart 600, each image can be characterized in a manner that allows the image machine learning system to be trained to predict if an image could potentially attract viewers to the product, service, etc. of a brand included in the image.
Referring to
Upon obtaining the output 702, which provides a performance measure of each input image, additional processing may be performed; for example, to identify which image or images are appropriate for publication. In general, images identified as having a good performance measure are typically more likely to be recommended (e.g., to a brand marketer) for publishing compared to images identified with poor performance metrics. From the listing of ranked images (presented in output 702), a subset of images can be identified to recommend for possible publication. For example, one or more thresholds may be defined for determining which performance metrics would be indicative of images that should be recommended for publication. A fixed number of top performers may be selected in another arrangement; for example, images having the top three performance metrics may be selected for recommendation for publication. In this illustrated example, the image having the top two largest performance metrics (e.g., Image 2 and Image 1) can be selected for recommendation to the brand marketer 304.
Along with providing recommendations from the output 702, other operations may be executed based upon the performance metrics assigned to each image. For example, performance metrics may assist in determining which images should be used as possible feedback to the image machine learning system 408 for further training. In one arrangement, images recommended for publication can be used for further training of the system 408. Attributes that represent these recommended images can be provided to the system 408 along with additional data such as interaction data (with end users) and transactional data (e.g., purchase data) that can be collected after the images are published by the brand marketer. By training the system 408 with top performing images, the system 408 can become more in tune to identifying similar images (e.g., other potential top performers). In a similar manner, images predicted as under-performing (compared to predicted top performers) may be used to further train the image machine learning system 408 to identify potentially poor performing images. One or more techniques may be employed to assist the image machine learning system 408 in identifying positive feedback (e.g., data representing top performing images) and negative feedback (e.g., data representing poor performing images); for example one more weighting techniques may be employ to highlight some feedback and reduce the effects of other feedback.
Referring to
Operations of the image manager 316 may include determining 802 a ranking of images using a machine learning system. The machine learning system is trained using attributes that represent each of a plurality of training images. The attributes include imagery attributes, social network attributes, and textual attributes. For example, a system such as the image machine learning system 408 can be trained by images represented by thirty-eight attributes (e.g., attributes listed in
Computing device 900 includes processor 902, memory 904, storage device 906, high-speed interface 908 connecting to memory 904 and high-speed expansion ports 910, and low speed interface 912 connecting to low speed bus 914 and storage device 906. Each of components 902, 904, 906, 908, 910, and 912, are interconnected using various busses, and can be mounted on a common motherboard or in other manners as appropriate. Processor 902 can process instructions for execution within computing device 900, including instructions stored in memory 904 or on storage device 906 to display graphical data for a GUI on an external input/output device, including, e.g., display 916 coupled to high speed interface 908. In other implementations, multiple processors and/or multiple busses can be used, as appropriate, along with multiple memories and types of memory. Also, multiple computing devices 900 can be connected, with each device providing portions of the necessary operations (e.g., as a server bank, a group of blade servers, or a multi-processor system).
Memory 904 stores data within computing device 900. In one implementation, memory 904 is a volatile memory unit or units. In another implementation, memory 904 is a non-volatile memory unit or units. Memory 904 also can be another form of computer-readable medium (e.g., a magnetic or optical disk. Memory 904 may be non-transitory.)
Storage device 906 is capable of providing mass storage for computing device 900. In one implementation, storage device 906 can be or contain a computer-readable medium (e.g., a floppy disk device, a hard disk device, an optical disk device, or a tape device, a flash memory or other similar solid state memory device, or an array of devices, such as devices in a storage area network or other configurations.) A computer program product can be tangibly embodied in a data carrier. The computer program product also can contain instructions that, when executed, perform one or more methods (e.g., those described above.) The data carrier is a computer- or machine-readable medium, (e.g., memory 904, storage device 906, memory on processor 902, and the like.)
High-speed controller 908 manages bandwidth-intensive operations for computing device 900, while low speed controller 912 manages lower bandwidth-intensive operations. Such allocation of functions is an example only. In one implementation, high-speed controller 908 is coupled to memory 904, display 916 (e.g., through a graphics processor or accelerator), and to high-speed expansion ports 910, which can accept various expansion cards (not shown). In the implementation, low-speed controller 912 is coupled to storage device 906 and low-speed expansion port 914. The low-speed expansion port, which can include various communication ports (e.g., USB, Bluetooth®, Ethernet, wireless Ethernet), can be coupled to one or more input/output devices, (e.g., a keyboard, a pointing device, a scanner, or a networking device including a switch or router, e.g., through a network adapter.)
Computing device 900 can be implemented in a number of different forms, as shown in the figure. For example, it can be implemented as standard server 920, or multiple times in a group of such servers. It also can be implemented as part of rack server system 924. In addition or as an alternative, it can be implemented in a personal computer (e.g., laptop computer 922.) In some examples, components from computing device 900 can be combined with other components in a mobile device (not shown), e.g., device 950. Each of such devices can contain one or more of computing device 900, 950, and an entire system can be made up of multiple computing devices 900, 950 communicating with each other.
Computing device 950 includes processor 952, memory 964, an input/output device (e.g., display 954, communication interface 966, and transceiver 968) among other components. Device 950 also can be provided with a storage device, (e.g., a microdrive or other device) to provide additional storage. Each of components 950, 952, 964, 954, 966, and 968, are interconnected using various buses, and several of the components can be mounted on a common motherboard or in other manners as appropriate.
Processor 952 can execute instructions within computing device 950, including instructions stored in memory 964. The processor can be implemented as a chipset of chips that include separate and multiple analog and digital processors. The processor can provide, for example, for coordination of the other components of device 950, e.g., control of user interfaces, applications run by device 950, and wireless communication by device 950.
Processor 952 can communicate with a user through control interface 958 and display interface 956 coupled to display 954. Display 954 can be, for example, a TFT LCD (Thin-Film-Transistor Liquid Crystal Display) or an OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) display, or other appropriate display technology. Display interface 956 can comprise appropriate circuitry for driving display 954 to present graphical and other data to a user. Control interface 958 can receive commands from a user and convert them for submission to processor 952. In addition, external interface 962 can communicate with processor 942, so as to enable near area communication of device 950 with other devices. External interface 962 can provide, for example, for wired communication in some implementations, or for wireless communication in other implementations, and multiple interfaces also can be used.
Memory 964 stores data within computing device 950. Memory 964 can be implemented as one or more of a computer-readable medium or media, a volatile memory unit or units, or a non-volatile memory unit or units. Expansion memory 974 also can be provided and connected to device 950 through expansion interface 972, which can include, for example, a SIMM (Single In Line Memory Module) card interface. Such expansion memory 974 can provide extra storage space for device 950, or also can store applications or other data for device 950. Specifically, expansion memory 974 can include instructions to carry out or supplement the processes described above, and can include secure data also. Thus, for example, expansion memory 974 can be provided as a security module for device 950, and can be programmed with instructions that permit secure use of device 950. In addition, secure applications can be provided through the SIMM cards, along with additional data, (e.g., placing identifying data on the SIMM card in a non-hackable manner.)
The memory can include, for example, flash memory and/or NVRAM memory, as discussed below. In one implementation, a computer program product is tangibly embodied in a data carrier. The computer program product contains instructions that, when executed, perform one or more methods, e.g., those described above. The data carrier is a computer- or machine-readable medium (e.g., memory 964, expansion memory 974, and/or memory on processor 952), which can be received, for example, over transceiver 968 or external interface 962.
Device 850 can communicate wirelessly through communication interface 966, which can include digital signal processing circuitry where necessary. Communication interface 966 can provide for communications under various modes or protocols (e.g., GSM voice calls, SMS, EMS, or MMS messaging, CDMA, TDMA, PDC, WCDMA, CDMA2000, or GPRS, among others.) Such communication can occur, for example, through radio-frequency transceiver 968. In addition, short-range communication can occur, e.g., using a Bluetooth®, WiFi, or other such transceiver (not shown). In addition, GPS (Global Positioning System) receiver module 970 can provide additional navigation- and location-related wireless data to device 950, which can be used as appropriate by applications running on device 950. Sensors and modules such as cameras, microphones, compasses, accelerators (for orientation sensing), etc. may be included in the device.
Device 950 also can communicate audibly using audio codec 960, which can receive spoken data from a user and convert it to usable digital data. Audio codec 960 can likewise generate audible sound for a user, (e.g., through a speaker in a handset of device 950.) Such sound can include sound from voice telephone calls, can include recorded sound (e.g., voice messages, music files, and the like) and also can include sound generated by applications operating on device 950.
Computing device 950 can be implemented in a number of different forms, as shown in the figure. For example, it can be implemented as cellular telephone 980. It also can be implemented as part of smartphone 982, a personal digital assistant, or other similar mobile device.
Various implementations of the systems and techniques described here can be realized in digital electronic circuitry, integrated circuitry, specially designed ASICs (application specific integrated circuits), computer hardware, firmware, software, and/or combinations thereof. These various implementations can include implementation in one or more computer programs that are executable and/or interpretable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor. The programmable processor can be special or general purpose, coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device.
These computer programs (also known as programs, software, software applications or code) include machine instructions for a programmable processor, and can be implemented in a high-level procedural and/or object-oriented programming language, and/or in assembly/machine language. As used herein, the terms machine-readable medium and computer-readable medium refer to a computer program product, apparatus and/or device (e.g., magnetic discs, optical disks, memory, Programmable Logic Devices (PLDs)) used to provide machine instructions and/or data to a programmable processor, including a machine-readable medium that receives machine instructions.
To provide for interaction with a user, the systems and techniques described here can be implemented on a computer having a device for displaying data to the user (e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor), and a keyboard and a pointing device (e.g., a mouse or a trackball) by which the user can provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interaction with a user as well; for example, feedback provided to the user can be a form of sensory feedback (e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback); and input from the user can be received in a form, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input.
The systems and techniques described here can be implemented in a computing system that includes a backend component (e.g., as a data server), or that includes a middleware component (e.g., an application server), or that includes a frontend component (e.g., a client computer having a user interface or a Web browser through which a user can interact with an implementation of the systems and techniques described here), or a combination of such back end, middleware, or frontend components. The components of the system can be interconnected by a form or medium of digital data communication (e.g., a communication network). Examples of communication networks include a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), and the Internet.
The computing system can include clients and servers. A client and server are generally remote from each other and typically interact through a communication network. The relationship of client and server arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship to each other.
In some implementations, the engines described herein can be separated, combined or incorporated into a single or combined engine. The engines depicted in the figures are not intended to limit the systems described here to the software architectures shown in the figures.
A number of embodiments have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the processes and techniques described herein. In addition, the logic flows depicted in the figures do not require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In addition, other steps can be provided, or steps can be eliminated, from the described flows, and other components can be added to, or removed from, the described systems. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4244657 | Wasylyk | Jan 1981 | A |
4998210 | Kadono et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5263132 | Parker et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5347266 | Bauman et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5412771 | Fenwick | May 1995 | A |
5416898 | Opstad et al. | May 1995 | A |
5444829 | Kawabata et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453938 | Gohara et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5526477 | McConnell et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5528742 | Moore et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533174 | Flowers et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5586242 | McQueen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5606649 | Tai | Feb 1997 | A |
5619721 | Maruko | Apr 1997 | A |
5630028 | DeMeo | May 1997 | A |
5737599 | Rowe et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748975 | Van De Vanter | May 1998 | A |
5757384 | Ikeda | May 1998 | A |
5761395 | Miyazaki et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781714 | Collins et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5877776 | Beaman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5926189 | Beaman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940581 | Lipton | Aug 1999 | A |
5995718 | Hiraike | Nov 1999 | A |
6012071 | Krishna et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016142 | Chang | Jan 2000 | A |
6031549 | Hayes-Roth | Feb 2000 | A |
6044205 | Reed et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6065008 | Simon et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073147 | Chan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6111654 | Cartier | Aug 2000 | A |
6141002 | Kanungo et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6167441 | Himmel | Dec 2000 | A |
6249908 | Stamm | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252671 | Peng et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6282327 | Betrisey | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6313920 | Dresevic et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320587 | Funyu | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323864 | Kaul et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330577 | Kim | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343301 | Halt et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6426751 | Patel | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6490051 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6512531 | Gartland | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522330 | Kobayashi | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522347 | Tsuji | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6583789 | Carlson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6601009 | Florschuetz | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6657625 | Chik et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6675358 | Kido | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6678688 | Unruh | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687879 | Teshima | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704116 | Abulhab | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6704648 | Naik et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718519 | Taieb | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738526 | Betrisey | May 2004 | B1 |
6754875 | Paradies | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760029 | Phinney et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771267 | Muller | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6810504 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6813747 | Taieb | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6853980 | Ying et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6856317 | Konsella et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6882344 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6901427 | Teshima | May 2005 | B2 |
6907444 | Narasimhan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6952210 | Renner et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6992671 | Corona | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6993538 | Gray | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7050079 | Estrada et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7064757 | Opstad et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7064758 | Chik et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7155672 | Adler et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7184046 | Hawkins | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7188313 | Hughes et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7228501 | Brown et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7231602 | Truelove et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7346845 | Teshima et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7373140 | Matsumoto | May 2008 | B1 |
7477988 | Dorum | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7492365 | Corbin et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505040 | Stamm et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7539939 | Schomer | May 2009 | B1 |
7552008 | Newstrom et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7580038 | Chik et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7583397 | Smith | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7636885 | Merz et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7701458 | Sahuc et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7735020 | Chaudhri | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752222 | Cierniak | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7768513 | Klassen | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7836094 | Ornstein et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7882432 | Nishikawa et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7937658 | Lunde | May 2011 | B1 |
7944447 | Clegg et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7958448 | Fattic et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7987244 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8098250 | Clegg et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8116791 | Agiv | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8201088 | Levantovsky et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8201093 | Tuli | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8306356 | Bever | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8381115 | Tranchant et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8413051 | Bacus et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8464318 | Hallak | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8601374 | Parham | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8643542 | Wendel | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8643652 | Kaplan | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8644810 | Boyle | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8689101 | Fux et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8707208 | DiCamillo | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8731905 | Tsang | May 2014 | B1 |
9063682 | Bradshaw | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9317777 | Kaasila et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9319444 | Levantovsky | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9432671 | Campanelli et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9449126 | Genoni | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9483445 | Joshi et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9569865 | Kaasila et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9576196 | Natarajan | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9626337 | Kaasila et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9691169 | Kaasila et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9805288 | Kaasila et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9817615 | Seguin et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10007863 | Pereira | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10115215 | Matteson et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10140261 | Yang | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10157332 | Gray | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10733529 | Tran | Aug 2020 | B1 |
10867241 | Rogers | Dec 2020 | B1 |
20010021937 | Cicchitelli et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010052901 | Kawabata et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010725 | Mo | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029232 | Bobrow et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020033824 | Stamm | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052916 | Kloba et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057853 | Usami | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059344 | Britton et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020087702 | Mori | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020093506 | Hobson | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020120721 | Eilers et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122594 | Goldberg et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020174186 | Hashimoto et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020194261 | Teshima | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014545 | Broussard et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030076350 | Vu | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030197698 | Perry et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040025118 | Renner | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040088657 | Brown et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040119714 | Everett et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040177056 | Davis et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040189643 | Frisken et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207627 | Konsella et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040233198 | Kubo | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050015307 | Simpson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033814 | Ota | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050094173 | Engelman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111045 | Imai | May 2005 | A1 |
20050128508 | Greef et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149942 | Venkatraman | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050190186 | Klassen | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050193336 | Fux et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050200871 | Miyata | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050264570 | Stamm | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050270553 | Kawara | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050275656 | Corbin et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010371 | Shur et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060017731 | Matskewich et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060061790 | Miura | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072136 | Hodder et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060072137 | Nishikawa et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060072162 | Nakamura | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060103653 | Chik et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060103654 | Chik et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060168639 | Gan | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060241861 | Takashima | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060245727 | Nakano et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253395 | Corbell | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267986 | Bae et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269137 | Evans | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285138 | Merz et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002016 | Cho et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070006076 | Cheng | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070008309 | Sahuc et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070024626 | Kagle et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050419 | Weyl et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055931 | Zaima | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070139412 | Stamm | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139413 | Stamm et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159646 | Adelberg et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070172199 | Kobayashi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070211062 | Engleman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070283047 | Theis et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080028304 | Levantovsky et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030502 | Chapman | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080115046 | Yamaguchi | May 2008 | A1 |
20080118151 | Bouguet et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080154911 | Cheng | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080222734 | Redlich et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243837 | Davis | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282186 | Basavaraju | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080303822 | Taylor | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080306916 | Gonzalez et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090031220 | Tranchant | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037492 | Baitalmal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090037523 | Kolke et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063964 | Huang | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070128 | McCauley et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090097049 | Cho | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090100074 | Joung et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119678 | Shih | May 2009 | A1 |
20090158134 | Wang | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171766 | Schiff et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183069 | Duggan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090275351 | Jeung et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287998 | Kalra | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290813 | He | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090303241 | Priyadarshi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307585 | Tranchant et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100014104 | Soord | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100066763 | MacDougall | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100088606 | Kanno | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088694 | Peng | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091024 | Myadam | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115454 | Tuli | May 2010 | A1 |
20100164984 | Rane | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100218086 | Howell et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100231598 | Hernandez et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100275161 | DiCamillo | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100321393 | Levantovsky | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110029103 | Mann et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032074 | Novack et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110090229 | Bacus et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110090230 | Bacus et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093565 | Bacus et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110115797 | Kaplan | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131153 | Grim, III | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110188761 | Boutros et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110203000 | Bacus et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110238495 | Kang | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110258535 | Adler, III et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110271180 | Lee | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276872 | Kataria | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289407 | Naik | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110310432 | Waki | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120001922 | Escher et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016964 | Veen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120033874 | Perronnin et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120066590 | Harris et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072978 | DeLuca et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120092345 | Joshi et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102176 | Lee et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102391 | Lee et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120127069 | Santhiveeran et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120134590 | Petrou | May 2012 | A1 |
20120215640 | Ramer et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120269425 | Marchesotti | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120288190 | Tang | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120306852 | Taylor | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120307263 | Ichikawa et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323694 | Lita et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323971 | Pasupuleti | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130033498 | Linnerud et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130067319 | Olszewski et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130120396 | Kaplan | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127872 | Kaplan | May 2013 | A1 |
20130156302 | Rodriguez Serrano et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130163027 | Shustef | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130179761 | Cho | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130185028 | Sullivan | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130215126 | Roberts | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215133 | Gould et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130321617 | Lehmann | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130326348 | Ip et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140025756 | Kamens | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140047329 | Levantovsky et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052801 | Zuo et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059054 | Liu | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140089348 | Vollmert | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140136957 | Kaasila et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140153012 | Seguin | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176563 | Kaasila et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140195903 | Kaasila et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140279039 | Systrom | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282055 | Engel et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140358802 | Biswas | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150020212 | Demaree | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150030238 | Yang et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150036919 | Bourdev et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150055855 | Rodriguez | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150062140 | Levantovsky et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150074522 | Hamed, III et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150097842 | Kaasila et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150100882 | Severenuk | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150154002 | Weinstein et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150178476 | Horton | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150193386 | Wurtz | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150220494 | Qin et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150278167 | Arnold et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150339273 | Yang et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150339276 | Bloem et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150339543 | Campanelli et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150348297 | Kaasila et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160078656 | Borson et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092439 | Ichimi | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160140952 | Graham | May 2016 | A1 |
20160170940 | Levantovsky | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160171343 | Kaasila et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160182606 | Kaasila et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160246762 | Eaton | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160307156 | Burner | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160307347 | Matteson et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160314377 | Vieira et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160321217 | Ikemoto et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160344828 | Hausler | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160371232 | Ellis et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170017778 | Ford et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170024641 | Wierzynski | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170098138 | Wang et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170124503 | Bastide | May 2017 | A1 |
20170237723 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170357877 | Lin | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180039605 | Pao et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180075455 | Kumnick et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180082156 | Jin et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180097763 | Garcia | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180109368 | Johnson | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180144256 | Saxena | May 2018 | A1 |
20180203851 | Wu | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180253988 | Kanayama | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180285696 | Eigen | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180285965 | Kaasila et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180332140 | Bullock | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180341907 | Tucker | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180373921 | Di Carlo | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190019087 | Fukui | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190095763 | Arilla et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190130232 | Kaasila et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20200219274 | Afridi | Jul 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0949574 | Oct 1999 | EP |
2166488 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2857983 | Apr 2015 | EP |
06-258982 | Sep 1994 | JP |
H10-124030 | May 1998 | JP |
2002-507289 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2003-288184 | Oct 2003 | JP |
05-215915 | Aug 2005 | JP |
05-217816 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2007-011733 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2009-545064 | Dec 2009 | JP |
5140997 | Nov 2012 | JP |
544595 | Aug 2003 | TW |
200511041 | Mar 2005 | TW |
WO 9423379 | Oct 1994 | WO |
WO 9900747 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 0191088 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 03023614 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 04012099 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 05001675 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2008013720 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report in European Application No. 18193233.6, dated Nov. 11, 2018, 8 pages. |
European Search Report in European Application No. 18197313.2, dated Nov. 30, 2018, 7 pages. |
Chen et al., “Detecting and reading text in natural scenes,” Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference Vision and Pattern Recognition; Publication [online]. 2004 [retrieved Dec. 16, 2018], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.334.2715&rep=rep1&type=pdf>; pp. 1-8. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US18/58191, dated Feb. 19, 2019, 17 pages. |
“A first experiment with multicoloured web fonts,” Manufactura Independente website, Feb. 28, 2011, Retrieved from the internet: http://blog.manufacturaindependente.org/2011/02/a-first-experiment-with-multicoloured-web-fonts/. |
“Announcing Speakeasy: A new open-source language tool from Typekit,” Oct. 28, 2010, online http://blog.typekit.com/2010/10/28/announcing-speakeasy-a-new-open-source-language-tool-from-typekit/. |
“colorfont/v1,” Feb. 28, 2011, retrieved from the internet: http://manufacturaindependente.com/colorfont/v1/. |
“Flash CS4 Professional ActionScript 2.0”, 2007, retrieved on http://help.adobe.com/en_US/AS2LCR/Flash_10.0/help.html?content=00000284.html on Aug. 31, 2015. |
“photofont.com—Use photofonts,” Sep. 2, 2012, retrieved from the internet: http://web.archive.org/web/20120902021143/http://photofont.com/photofont/use/web. |
“Saffron Type System”, retrieved from the internet Nov. 12, 2014, 7 pages. |
Adobe Systems Incorporated, “PostScript Language Reference—Third Edition,” Feb. 1999, pp. 313-390. |
Adobe Systems Incorporated, “The Type 42 Font Format Specification,” Technical Note #5012, Jul. 31, 1998, pp. 1-24. |
Adobe Systems Incorporated, “To Unicode Mapping File Tutorial,” Adobe Technical Note, XP002348387, May 2003. |
Apple Computers, “The True Type Font File,” Oct. 27, 2000, pp. 1-17. |
Celik et al., “W3C, CSS3 Module: Fonts,” W3C Working Draft, Jul. 31, 2001, pp. 1-30. |
Doughty, Mike, “Using OpenType® Fonts with Adobe® InDesign®,” Jun. 11, 2012 retrieved from the internet: http://webarchive.org/web/20121223032924/http://www.sketchpad.net/opentype-indesign.htm (retrieved Sep. 22, 2014), 2 pages. |
European Search Report, 13179728.4, dated Sep. 10, 2015, 3 pages. |
European Search Report, 14184499.3, dated Jul. 13, 2015, 7 pages. |
European Search Report, 14187549.2, dated Jul. 30, 2015, 7 pages. |
Extensis, Suitcase 10.2, Quick Start Guide for Macintosh, 2001, 23 pgs. |
Font Pair, [online]. “Font Pair”, Jan. 20, 2015, Retrieved from URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20150120231122/http://fontpair.co/, 31 pages. |
Forums.macrumors.com [online], “which one is the main FONTS folder ?” May 19, 2006, [retrieved on Jun. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet: URL<https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/which-one-is-the-main-fontsfolder.202284/>, 7 pages. |
George Margulis, “Optical Character Recognition: Classification of Handwritten Digits and Computer Fonts”, Aug. 1, 2014, URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20140801114017/http://cs229.stanford.edu/proj2011/Margulis-OpticalCharacterRecognition.pdf. |
Goswami, Gautum, “Quite ‘Writly’ Said!,” One Brick at a Time, Aug. 21, 2006, Retrieved from the internet: :http://gautamg.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/quj.te-writely-said/ (retrieved on Sep. 23, 2013), 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT application No. PCT/US2013/071519 dated Jun. 9, 2015, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT application No. PCT/US2015/066145 dated Jun. 20, 2017, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT application No. PCT/US2016/023282, dated Oct. 26, 2017, 9 pages. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion issued in PCT application No. PCT/US10/01272, dated Jun. 15, 2010, 6 pages. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion issued in PCT application No. PCT/US2011/034050 dated Jul. 15, 2011, 13 pages. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, PCT/US2013/026051, dated Jun. 5, 2013, 9 pages. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, PCT/US2013/071519, dated Mar. 5, 2014, 12 pages. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, PCT/US2013/076917, dated Jul. 9, 2014, 11 pages. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, PCT/US2014/010786, dated Sep. 30, 2014, 9 pages. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/023282, dated Oct. 7, 2016, 16 pages. |
Japanese Office Action, 2009-521768, dated Aug. 28, 2012. |
Japanese Office Action, 2013-508184, dated Apr. 1, 2015. |
Ma Wei-Ying et al., “Framework for adaptive content delivery in heterogeneous network environments”, Jan. 24, 2000, Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.cooltown.hp.com/papers/adcon/MMCN2000. |
Open Text Exceed, User's Guide, Version 14, Nov. 2009, 372 pgs. |
Saurabh, Kataria et al., “Font retrieval on a large scale: An experimental study”, 2010 17th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP 2010); Sep. 26-29, 2010; Hong Kong, China, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Sep. 26, 2010, pp. 2177-2180. |
Supplementary European Search Report, European Patent Office, European patent application No. EP 07796924, dated Dec. 27, 2010, 8 pages. |
TrueType Fundamentals, Microsoft Typography, Nov. 1997, pp. 1-17. |
Typeconnection, [online], “typeconnection”, Feb. 26, 2015, Retrieved from URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20150226074717/http://www.typeconnection.com/stepl.php, 4 pages. |
Universal Type Server, Upgrading from Suitcase Server, Sep. 29, 2009, 18 pgs. |
Wenzel, Martin, “An Introduction to OpenType Substitution Features,” Dec. 26, 2012, Retrieved from the internet: http://web.archive.org/web/20121226233317/http://ilovetypography.com/OpenType/opentype-features. Html (retrieved on Sep. 18, 2014), 12 pages. |
Written Opposition to the grant of Japanese Patent No. 6097214 by Masatake Fujii, dated Sep. 12, 2017, 97 pages, with partial English translation. |
Koren et al., “Visualization of labeled data using linear transformations.” IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2003 (IEEE Cat. No. 03TH8714). |
Liu, “Visual Exploration and Comparative Analytics of Multidimensional Data Sets”, Graduate Program in Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, 2016, 210 pages. |
Shusen, et al. “Distortion-Guided Structure-Driven Interactive Exploration of High-Dimensional Data,” Computer Graphics Forum., 2014, 33(3):101-110. |
Wu et al., “Stochastic neighbor projection on manifold for feature extraction.” Neurocomputing, 2011,74(17):780-2789. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190073537 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |