The present invention is directed toward water management, and more particularly toward a utility line bedding structure for storing and dissipating storm water run-off.
Disposal of surface run-off from storm events and the like is a significant problem, particularly in urban areas with a high percentage of paved surfaces. Many older cities in the eastern part of the United States utilize combined storm and sanitary sewers with the combined effluent being treated at wastewater treatment plants. In the event of a large storm exceeding the design capacity of the combined system, direct discharge of raw sewage into receiving waterways may result. Other parts of the country utilize separate storm and sanitary sewers. Localized flooding problems may arise, however, either through under design of the storm water systems or through changes in the run-off patterns resulting from development. Typically such a problem would be addressed by adding additional storm sewers or enlarging existing storm sewers. However, this is a costly process which causes great inconvenience to local residents. In addition, in times of local, state and federal budget deficits, expansion of existing storm water sewers can be difficult to finance.
In areas of rapid growth it is not unusual for a municipality or a developer to need to expand water, sanitary sewers, gas lines, cable access, telephone lines, electrical lines or the like (collectively, “utility lines”) to meet the needs of a growing population. Often these utility lines are financed through specific assessments and management of storm water through expansion of existing storm water sewers is beyond the scope of the construction projects. Construction of these utility lines requires excavation and trenching which, if funding were available, could accommodate expanded storm sewers in a single trenching operation without requiring separate trenching and the attendant destruction and then repair of roadways and sidewalks affected by the trenching.
A conventional prior art utility line trench 10 is illustrated in
One known solution for storage and dissipation of storm water run-off is the use of earth drains. An earth drain is essentially a well connected to an underlying water table which receives surface run-off and rapidly percolates it into the water table. Also known are the use of French drains which consist of a trench filled with a granular porous material such as gravel which can receive and temporarily store surface run-off while the surface run-off percolates to the underlying water table. While such structures provide a means of disposing of surface run-off without having to tap into or expand existing storm water run-off systems, such systems still require trenching and the attendant inconvenience and costs of digging up intercepting roads and sidewalks.
In addition to earth drains and French drains, a number of surface water retention and dissipation structures are known in the art. One example is shown in Glasser, U.S. Pat. No. 4,917,536. Glasser teaches a fluid reservoir consisting of a stack of plastic core sheets bundled together to form a module. While providing a storage structure apart from a storm sewer system, this structure requires additional excavation and is relatively high cost and thus does not provide a solution to the problem discussed above.
Another underground draining system is taught in Urriola, U.S. Pat. No. 5,810,510. The system of Urriola also consists of a storage tank and the storage tank of Urriola is made of perforated wall modules wrapped in a water permeable geotextile. The storage tanks of Urriola provide for temporary storage of water and enable the water to percolate to the surrounding strata. However, like Glasser, Urriola requires excavation to build a large underground tank and requires the use of the costly perforated wall modules and thus does not provide a cost effective solution to the problem discussed above.
Cushing, U.S. Pat. No. 4,620,817, illustrates an example of a French drain structure. Cushing shows a perforated pipe 64 running through a sand and gravel bedding. As precipitation is collected and directed to the pipe 64, water percolates through the perforation 66 and into the sand and gravel bedding and eventually into the underlying water table.
The prior art has failed to provide a utility line bedding or installation method for a utility line bedding that performs the function of supporting the utility line while simultaneously providing water retention and dissipation in a cost effective manner.
The present invention is directed toward overcoming one or more of the problems discussed above.
A first aspect of the present invention is a bedding for a utility line. The bedding consists of an elongate trench formed in the earth. A filter fabric wrap is provided lining a lengthwise segment of the trench, with the lengthwise segment having a select length. A first select depth of a porous particulate material resting on a trench bottom underlies a non-perforated utility line being installed and supports the non-perforated utility line in the lengthwise segment. A second select depth of porous particulate material overlies the non-perforated utility line in the lengthwise segment. The length of the lengthwise segment, the first select depth and the second select depth are selected to store a select volume of water.
Preferably, the first select depth is sufficient to provide liquid communication between a bottom of the lengthwise segment of the trench and a water table underlying the trench. Alternatively, at least one drainage well can be provided in liquid communication between a water table underlying the trench and the bottom of the lengthwise segment of the trench.
A conduit may be included providing liquid communication between a source of water and the lengthwise segment of the trench. A perforated pipe may be provided overlying the non-perforated utility line in the lengthwise segment, with the perforated pipe being in fluid communication with the conduit. The source of water may be a bioretention facility consisting of an engineered planting medium overlying a water collection structure, with the surface of the engineered planning medium supporting growing plants. The collection structure is in liquid communication with the conduit. The collection structure may consist of a perforated pipe within a porous particulate material bed, the perforated pipe being in liquid communication with the conduit. The porous particulate material of the bedding may be a gravel, preferably a clean graded gravel.
A second aspect of the present invention is a surface water retention and dissipation structure. The surface water retention and dissipation structure includes a catch basin configured to collect surface water run-off and an elongate trench formed in the earth. A filter fabric wrap lines a lengthwise segment of the trench, the lengthwise segment having a select length. A first select depth of porous particulate material rests on a trench bottom underlying a non-perforated utility line of the lengthwise segment. A second select depth of porous particulate a material overlies the non-perforated utility line in the lengthwise segment. The filter fabric wrap surrounds the porous particulate material. A conduit is in liquid communication between the catch basin and the lengthwise segment. The select length of the lengthwise segment, the first select depth and the second select depth are selected to store a select volume of water received from the catch basin. A perforated pipe may be provided overlying the non-perforated utility line in the lengthwise segment and the perforated pipe is in liquid communication with the conduit. The first select depth is preferably sufficient to communicate the bottom of the trench with a water table underlying the trench. Alternatively, a drainage well may be provided in liquid communication between a water table underlying the trench and the bottom of the trench. A bioretention facility may also be provided in liquid communication with the lengthwise segment. The bioretention facility includes an engineered planting medium overlying a water collection structure, with the surface of the engineered planning medium supporting growing plants and the collection structure being in liquid communication with the conduit. The water collection structure of the bioretention facility preferably consists of a perforated pipe within a porous particulate material bed, the perforated pipe being in liquid communication with the conduit.
A third aspect of the present invention is a method of constructing a utility line bedding for water management, the utility line bedding being configured to contain a select volume of water to be dissipated. As a first step of the method a volume of water to be dissipated is determined. Next, a utility line trench is excavated in the earth at a width sized to receive a non-perforated utility line of a given outer diameter therein. As part of the trench formation a lengthwise segment of the trench is excavated to a select segment length and a lengthwise segment depth. The lengthwise segment of the trench is lined with a filter fabric wrap. A base of porous particulate material is provided on the bottom of the trench to a first select depth in the lengthwise segment of the trench. The non-perforated utility line is laid upon the base. A cover of porous particulate material having a second select depth is provided over the non-perforated utility line. The first select depth, the second depth and the select length of the lengthwise segment of the trench are selected to define a sufficient volume of void space in the porous particulate material to hold the select volume of water to be displaced. The method may further include providing liquid communication between the bottom of the lengthwise segment and a water table underlying the lengthwise segment. The liquid communication may be provided by excavating the lengthwise segment to a depth sufficient for the trench bottom to lie below the surface of an underlying water table. A perforated pipe is preferably provided in the cover of the particulate material over the non-perforated utility line in the lengthwise segment with the perforated pipe being in liquid communication with the source of water to be dissipated.
The bedding for utility line, the water retention and dissipation structure and the method of constructing a utility line bedding for water management of the present invention each address the problem of dissipating excess water from flood prone areas adjacent to an installation site of a utility line. By utilizing a modified trench excavated for installation of the utility line, the present invention minimizes the cost of building the water storage and dissipating structure. At most, marginal increases in costs result from the expenses associated with excavating the utility line deeper than might otherwise be required, the porous particulate matter (e.g., gravel) necessary to fill the trench and the filter fabric wrap encasing the porous particulate material. Where a bioremediation facility is desired, additional costs may be involved. Dissipation of water received in the structure can be significantly enhanced by bringing the elongate portion of the trench forming the retention structure into fluid communication with an underlying water table. This can be achieved most cost effectively simply by excavating the trench sufficiently deep so that the trench bottom resides within the water table, preferably more than a foot under the water table level. Where the water table is too deep to be excavated to, a drainage well can be drilled from the bottom of the trench to the underlying water table to bring the water table into liquid communication with the trench bottom. Because of the marginal costs associated with building the storm water dissipation structure of the present invention, relief from annoying flooding can be afforded residents of rapidly developing areas without the huge expenses associated with constructing new or enlarged storm sewers or contending with the environmental concerns related to the direct discharge of stormwater run-off into surface waters. In coastal communities where saltwater intrusion is a concern this approach also has the benefit of reducing loss of rainwater to tide and thus helps combat salt-water intrusion into surficial aquifers. Furthermore, the method and structures of the present invention require only a single tear up of affected roads and sidewalks, significantly decreasing both the expense and the inconvenience to residents while still effectively addressing annoying and potentially dangerous flooding problems. The addition of a bioretention facility, removes pollutants in the stormwater in the runoff that is released to the water table.
Referring to
In designing and constructing the water retention and dissipating utility line bed 32, the desired volume of water to be retained within the water retention and dissipating utility line bedding must first be determined. The dimensions of the lengthwise segment of the trench 36 defining the water retention volume are then calculated to accommodate the volume of water. In one embodiment, the water to be dissipated is storm water run-off and the volume of water to be dissipated is calculated based upon the hydrologic characteristics of a basin feeding into the water retention and dissipating utility line bedding and a storm event of a desired magnitude, e.g., the 100-year storm. Referring to
The preferred embodiment illustrated in
In some instances the mean water elevation table will be far enough beneath the surface that the trench cannot be excavated to reach the water table. In this circumstance, generally the volume of water storage must be greater where the water retaining and dissipating structure is used for storm water run-off because the water will percolate out of the porous particulate material and into an underlying water table at a much slower rate. Thus, the lengthwise segment must have a greater length and/or depth than would be required if the trench bottom was below the mean water table elevation.
As an alternative design, illustrated in
In use, during a storm event, storm water run-off flows onto the surface of the engineered planting medium and percolates into the porous particulate material bed 94 and is collected by the perforated under drain 92, conveyed to the catch basin 88 and conveyed by the conduit 62 to the water retention and dissipating utility line bedding 32. The water is filtered by the engineered planting medium and the plants on the surface assist both in obstructing particulates and absorbing contaminates such as nutrients, metals, and hydrocarbons washed onto the surface of the bioretention facility 80 with the surface run-off. In the event of an extreme storm event, storm water may flow directly into the overflow grate 90 and not have the benefit of being filtered through the bioretention facility. However, because the majority of contaminants will be contained in the “first flush” of run-off, which will be filtered through the bioretention facility, water entering the overflow likely will have a much lesser amount of particulate and other contaminants.
The surface water retention and dissipation structure in accordance with the present invention provides an efficient and cost effective vehicle for the storage and dissipation of surface water run-off. These advantages are provided by only minor modifications to conventional utility line bedding trenches and can augment existing storm water run-off facilities or, in some instance, substitute for conventional storm water sewer systems. Utilization of utility trenches eliminates the expense and disruption associated with additional trenching associated with conventional storm water run-off dissipation. Including the bioretention facility as a mechanism for delivering storm water to the surface water retention and dissipating utility line bedding provides removal of particulate and chemical contamination before the surface water is conveyed to the water table. Once constructed, the storm water retention and dissipation system operates substantially expense and maintenance free.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2007969 | Grodsky | Jul 1935 | A |
3188694 | Hammar | Jun 1965 | A |
3374593 | Rensch | Mar 1968 | A |
3568455 | McLaughlin | Mar 1971 | A |
3623296 | Santoro | Nov 1971 | A |
3675432 | Keene | Jul 1972 | A |
3816931 | LaMar | Jun 1974 | A |
3952529 | Lefever | Apr 1976 | A |
3973407 | Vecchio | Aug 1976 | A |
4057500 | Wager | Nov 1977 | A |
4197036 | Masquelier | Apr 1980 | A |
4199272 | Lacey | Apr 1980 | A |
4337006 | Lacey | Jun 1982 | A |
4620817 | Cushing | Nov 1986 | A |
4880333 | Glasser | Nov 1989 | A |
4917536 | Glasser | Apr 1990 | A |
4925342 | Hendy | May 1990 | A |
4934865 | Varkonyi | Jun 1990 | A |
5120164 | Iacocca et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5316410 | Blume | May 1994 | A |
5342144 | McCarthy | Aug 1994 | A |
5492434 | Adams | Feb 1996 | A |
5495696 | Repka | Mar 1996 | A |
5688073 | Brodeur | Nov 1997 | A |
5735304 | Chumley | Apr 1998 | A |
5752784 | Motz | May 1998 | A |
5765967 | Klaymar | Jun 1998 | A |
5810510 | Urriola | Sep 1998 | A |
5836716 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5848856 | Bohnhoff | Dec 1998 | A |
5997735 | Gorton | Dec 1999 | A |
6048131 | Laak | Apr 2000 | A |
6095718 | Bohnhoff | Aug 2000 | A |
6227763 | Kuhns | May 2001 | B1 |
6270661 | Jowett | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277274 | Coffman | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6383372 | Houck | May 2002 | B1 |
6428239 | Davis | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6505996 | Ianniello | Jan 2003 | B1 |
20020172557 | Chen | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030059258 | Lee | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030082004 | Wilkerson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030082005 | Scott | May 2003 | A1 |
20030094309 | Dimitroff | May 2003 | A1 |
20030118402 | Sakamoto | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030118405 | Sakamoto | Jun 2003 | A1 |