Developing and deploying additional hydropower are essential to achieving comprehensive clean and renewable energy solutions. Hydroelectric power plants use water flowing through hydro turbine generators to generate electricity. Water is renewed and supplied by snow or rainfall. Less discussed, but crucially important is a pumped-storage hydropower (PSH) that uses excess power from the grid to pump water into an upper reservoir, and then release to generate electricity as needed. Although current PSH uses more energy than it can generate, it is effective in storing hydro potential energy. A typical PSH upper reservoir is large enough to hold water for 8 to 10 hours of power generation.
Expanding hydropower capacities requires a large reservoir at higher elevation and often substantial initial capital costs. Siting requirements for hydropower facilities demand adequate rainfall or water availability to replenish water. Environmental impacts may not be ignored for PSH facilities as some operate with more than 300-m heads. Because they are typically built on hills, it might take up to −4 km distance to achieve the head.
There are hundreds of solar, wind, and battery storage development efforts waiting to connect to the grid. Adding standalone hydropower systems will face the same difficulties with interconnections unless they are more reliable than currently available energy options waiting to be integrated into existing grid or they require substantially less capital investment for new grid.
The present invention introduces the utility scale hydro pump (USHP) system and method to address some of these limitations and challenges. USHP is purposefully designed to be practical by making the system modular, scalable, additive, and environmentally friendly. With predictable and steady power generation, USHP is relatively easy to integrate into existing infrastructure or operate as standalone power production (SPP) units. Unlike solar and wind energy, USHP requires much less land and could be built at or near the location of power consumption. Furthermore, USHP is not affected by weather and operates on demand.
The present invention is an innovative hydro-mechanical system to efficiently pump water to an upper reservoir by generally following the vertical mechanical separation of water (VMSW) method.
The present invention provides water at a higher elevation, as input fuel to various applications for the energy storage and hydroelectric power industries.
The prior art systems recognize the benefits of using combinations of buoyancy and gravity to gain potential energy that could be converted to other forms of energy including electricity.
U.S. Ser. No. 11/415,097B1 describes VMSW system and method to solve a very difficult problem of placing a buoyant object or adding water into the lower chamber of the water tower without losing water from the lower chamber.
VMSW regulates the useable volume for water near the top of the water tower to change the water level in the water tower. A positively buoyant driver moves vertically following the water level. As the driver moves up, a void is produced in the lower chamber—equal to the volume of the driver no longer in the lower chamber. Water from the lower reservoir, through a sliding watertight recycle door, flows down to fill the void in the lower chamber. After releasing water to the upper reservoir near the top of the water tower, to restore the system back to the initial settings for repeating the operation, the water level once again is changed. Upper reservoir water is released to generate electricity. Hydro discharge, water, enters back into the lower reservoir and recycled. System capacity is determined by the water volume pumped into an upper reservoir per unit time and the head minus energy to operate VMSW.
VMSW capacity is directly proportional to the volume of the driver operating in the water tower. U.S. Ser. No. 11/415,097B1 provides simple qualitative energy calculations using a cylindrical driver with radius of 1.7-m and 70-m length to achieve 50-m head to generate electricity comparable to 1-megawatt (MW) wind turbine generator (WTG). Although the calculation is for illustrative purposes, VMSW uses a ˜500 MT driver. To double the output, VMSW would need the driver twice as large, making the water tower also twice as large and heavy.
Other prior art systems attempt to generate power using various techniques to insert, inject, or circulate buoyant objects. US20140196450A1 describes a method to gain potential energy by inserting buoyant objects through several chambers, leading the object to the top of the water tank. WO2014/128729A2 uses a hollow launching chamber in the lower part of the water tank. U.S. Pat. No. 5,944,480A, JPH10141204A, JP2002138944A, and DE102012009226A1 rely upon either a vacuum effect to retain liquid in the tube or use a watertight seal to slide balls into the tube or apply air pressure in the drive system to load. US20190338747A1 features a start/stop system with buoyant modules moving through a bi-level water tank. US20140130497A1 explains a system that relies on fluid flow due to pressure differentials to perform the work. US20130318960A1 uses a bladder to control buoyancy mechanism while U.S. Pat. No. 8,456,027B1 describes a system to rotate the driver shaft by alternately charging the buoyancy vehicles with the pressurized gas.
US20060042244A1 provides details of a fluid shaft used in a hermetically sealed buoyancy chamber. U.S. Pat. No. 4,718,232A discloses a closed-loop system with multiple valves with pressure control design. WO2014/035267A1 uses floating devices alternatively to generate power while U.S. Pat. No. 8,516,812B2 discloses a vertical pipe system to float objects. JP2020190243A disclosure uses a floating object in a water tank.
VMSW is heavy and difficult to build and operate. Furthermore, continuously changing the water level in the water tower to raise, hold, and lower an extremely large and heavy driver presents difficult engineering challenges.
To be practical and competitive with other renewable energy options, it is necessary to significantly reduce the dimensions and mass of the water tower to mitigate safety concerns as well as minimize costs to build and operate—without compromising the system capacity.
The USHP designation is used to describe both the method and the system, including all the components as well as the physical structures. For USHP, the water tower designation is used specifically for vertically arranged lower chamber and upper chamber and all components in these chambers, to clearly describe the water volume in the water tower during various stages of the operation.
Top of the lower chamber and bottom of the upper chamber share a chamber opening. The lower chamber, via a sliding watertight recycle door, is connected to a lower reservoir. The lower reservoir collects, stores, and supplies (recycled) water to the lower chamber of the water tower. The lower reservoir water level is maintained to be higher than the top of the lower chamber to continuously supply water to the lower chamber. The top of the upper chamber is connected to an upper reservoir.
Although there could be many different variations, USHP prefers to use a compressible vehicle to push or pump water into the upper reservoir. The vehicle volume generally defines the maximum amount of water that could be pumped into the upper reservoir and the vehicle's height determines the lower chamber height. When lifted or compressed, the vehicle bottom may be flush with the top of the lower chamber or any height up to this point.
USHP upper chamber has a unique combination of a body chamber and a head chamber. The body chamber directly above the lower chamber, has at least the same shape and volume as the vehicle. The head chamber, above any location on top of the body chamber at any angle, is drastically reduced and its inner cross section is much smaller than that of the body chamber. Smaller cross section of the head chamber compared to that of the body chamber allows USHP to reduce the original VMSW water tower volume and mass by up to 90% or more.
Using a mechanical lifting device (MLD), USHP lifts or compresses the vehicle to produce a void without losing original water in the lower chamber and without sharing water between the lower and upper chambers while the vehicle is lifted. As the vehicle is lifted, a void with the volume equivalent to the vehicle volume no longer in the lower chamber is produced. The void, as produced, gets filled with water from the lower reservoir through a recycle door. Lifting the vehicle results in pumping, through the chamber opening, water in the upper chamber into the upper reservoir.
Water released from the upper reservoir is used to turn a hydro turbine generator and its hydro discharge or exiting water from the hydro turbine generator replenishes the lower reservoir. Without force applied, the vehicle, with its base open and MLD disengaged and lowered, would sink or decompress and be at the bottom of the lower chamber for repeat operations.
While leaving the rest of the system about the same, making the head chamber taller increases the system capacity. USHP is a practical and buildable translation of the VMSW water tower system.
The drawings show preferred embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.
USHP could use commonly available sensors and motorized components requiring external power source. Descriptions and functionalities of the commonly used parts are not provided in detail—such as opening or closing a sliding watertight door, etc. Throughout the discussion, each term or terminology represents a unique component, feature, or function to further clarify descriptions and methods.
Vehicle 3, denser than water, rests at the bottom of the lower chamber 11 (
Vehicle 3 could take many different shapes and forms. USHP uses a vehicle 3 with removable, foldable, sliding, or openable base 16 to eliminate the need for a separate sliding watertight door between the lower chamber 11 and the upper chamber 12. For a cylindrical vehicle 3, its base 16 could be a grill that closes (
In a simple form, vehicle 3 could have a cylindrical shape (
To simplify the vehicle operation, USHP uses a vehicle 3 with open top and only the bottom base 16 (
Compressible vehicle 3, as shown in
With the base 16 closed, water inside the vehicle 3 becomes a part of the upper chamber 12 due to how the water is separated in the water tower 2.
Closing the recycle door 9 and then opening the base 16, denser than the walls of the vehicle 3, and disengaging from MLD 10 decompress the vehicle 3 walls back to its natural state. Vehicle 3 does not decompress without opening the base 16 when the recycle door 9 is closed.
USHP design allows some functions to be combined or performed differently than explained above. For example, the base 16 could be a part of MLD 10 rather than a part of the vehicle 3—so long as the base 16 serves the same function of separating the lower chamber 11 and the upper chamber 12 while the vehicle 3 is lifted. Or vehicle 3 could have motorized legs or gears to incorporate the MLD 10 functions.
With the recycle door 9 closed, disengage and lower MLD 10, and open the base 16 to start decompressing the vehicle 3 walls as shown in
Water level in the upper reservoir 4 and the lower reservoir 8 change as the vehicle 3 is lifted. The upper reservoir 4 and the lower reservoir 8 are separate from the water tower 2. Water tower 2 is kept full of water throughout USHP normal operations since the void gets filled real-time through the recycle door 9. Importance of this is discussed in the Energy Calculations section below.
To generate electricity and to replenish the lower reservoir 8, USHP releases the upper reservoir 4 water through a reservoir release valve 5. The lower reservoir 8 receives hydro discharge at the lower reservoir entrance 18 (
The upper chamber 12 has a unique combination of a body chamber 13 and a head chamber 14. The body chamber 13 shape and volume should be just large enough to accommodate the vehicle 3 movement. More specifically, the body chamber 13 volume needs to match the change in the vehicle 3 volume in the lower chamber 11.
For PSH applications, in some instances, it might be useful to have the head chamber 14 at an angle to connect to the upper reservoir 4 which is likely some distance away.
USHP design provides flexibilities to adapt to the applications and the environment. For example, as shown in
For a small capacity of ˜100-kilowatt range, systems may be built at a factory with minimal assembly at the job site. Transport these mini USHP systems where needed, add water, and operate. Since USHP could be operated next to each other, it would be relatively easy to scale up and build a mini USHP farm in a matter of days.
USHP allows for easy starts and stops using MILD 10 which could be a hydraulic lift motor or a motor operating a linear gear to manage the vertical movement of the vehicle 3. Lifting a large, heavy vehicle 3 repeatedly for an extended period—requires careful assessments as to how and where to stage and operate MLD 10. Planning for maintenance, repair and replacement should be considered.
MLD 10 could be placed in different locations such as alongside rather than from the bottom of the vehicle 3. MLD 10 could be operated from from the top of the body chamber 13 as well. MLD 10 could lock a vehicle 3 in any position within its allowed range. There is no need for separate brakes to stop and hold the vehicle 3.
For multiple units of USHP, sharing a common upper reservoir 4 could minimize the overall reservoir size while improving the combined system structural integrity. Upper reservoir 4 could have many different shapes and volume. For SPP applications, USHP could have an upper reservoir 4 placed around or near the top of the head chamber 14 (
USHP relies on redundant sensors for monitoring water flowrate, water volume and water level as well as operating all components. The lower reservoir 8 continuously maintains its water level higher than the top of a lower chamber 11 via hydro discharge throughout operations.
Before starting an operation, the following initial settings of USHP 1 need to be established as shown in
Once these USHP 1 initial settings, as shown in
It should be noted that lifting the vehicle 3 requires MLD 10 also lift water above the vehicle 3 in the upper chamber 12. The water column volume above the vehicle 3 is not uniform since the head chamber 14 cross sections are smaller than the body chamber 13. This is a very important feature of USHP. Additional discussions of USHP are provided below.
Assume a simple shape for a vehicle 3 with compressible walls, open top, and a bottom base 16. With the base 16 closed, the vehicle 3 separates the lower chamber 11 and the upper chamber 12. With base 16 open, the entire water tower 2 is one body of water since the lower chamber 11 and the upper chamber 12 are connected. The vehicle 3 volume and mass are calculated with its base 16 closed with water in the vehicle 3.
Consider three cases with the same vehicle 3 volumes of 30-m3 for USHP to generate electricity comparable to a 2-MW WTG. Different heights for the vehicle 3 and the head chamber 14 are selected to highlight the importance of the head chamber 14 to USHP. The head chamber 14 height is adjusted to produce the head of either 50-m or 100-m. Head is assume to be the vertical distance between the top of the head chamber 14 and the hydro input elevation to the turbine generator 7 which is assumed to be about 1-m above the lower chamber 11.
In rough order calculations, it is assumed that the vehicle 3 could be compressed 100%. In all three cases, each time a vehicle 3 is lifted, 30-m3 of water is pumped into an upper reservoir 4. The total mass USHP has to lift is defined as the sum of mass of the vehicle 3 and the water column above the vehicle 3.
In simple terms, lifting a vehicle 3 pushes water out of the upper chamber 12 and into the upper reservoir 4. Before starting an operation, fill the water tower 2 to the top of the head chamber 14. Throughout operations, the following is observed:
It may not be obvious as to how USHP could convert the mechanical energy of lifting the vehicle 3 to produce substantially more hydro potential energy. The answer is in how USHP is prepared and operated.
It may be useful to compare USHP and a hot air balloon. Hot air balloon initially requires filling a deflated balloon with hot air—like filling an empty water tower 2. This initial preparation requires a lot of energy and proportionally more as the system capacity increases. As a bigger balloon could carry more mass, bigger the water tower 2, more energy could be generated.
Starting USHP with the water tower 2 filled with water is equivalent to preparing the hot air balloon filled with hot air in an upright position on the ground. At this point, applying relatively small additional energy, compared to preparing the systems initially, will drive the systems in motion. Major difference between a hot air balloon and USHP is that the hot air balloon loses hot air much more rapidly than USHP loses water through evaporation—whether the system is idle or in motion.
Maintaining the water tower 2 filled with water, to the top of the head chamber 14, would be like keeping the hot air balloon ready for a takeoff in an upright position on the ground. USHP effectively and efficiently uses its initial energy of filling the water tower 2. As USHP pumps, water into the upper reservoir 4, the void in the lower chamber 11 gets filled with water simultaneously—through the recycle door 9.
The inner cross section of the head chamber 14 needs to be smaller than that of the body chamber 13; otherwise, USHP would not realize desired efficiencies. Flowrate into the upper reservoir 4 is a critical parameter that help define the USHP capacity. USHP is a large hydro-mechanical system that would complete a few cycles of operation per minute. Optimizing the flowrate as a function of the head section 14 diameter to the upper reservoir 4 is important.
USHP uses negative buoyancy of the vehicle 3 to restore the vehicle 3 back to the initial position for repeat operations. Base 16, denser than the walls of the vehicle 3, should be in an open position to restore the initial settings. Just to complete the comparisons, hot air balloon releases hot air from the balloon to lower itself. While released hot air is no longer usable, the recycled water continues to fuel USHP.
In all three cases considered above, the same void volume (30-m3) is produced in the lower chamber 11 during each cycle and the same water volume (30-m3) is added to the upper reservoir 4 at different heights and then released for energy calculations.
Work required to lift the vehicle 3 from the bottom of the lower chamber 11 in the first two cases roughly have the same total mass of ˜75 MT. The 5-m tall vehicle 3 is lifted 5-m whereas the 2-m tall vehicle 3 lifted 2-m to produce the same void volume of 30-m3 in the lower chamber 11 since the lower chamber 11 height is designed to match the vehicle 3 height. Overall dimensions and especially the height of the vehicle 3 is a key parameter to optimize in the USHP design.
Although this is a simplistic view of a complex system, it clearly demonstrates that the shape and volume of the vehicle 3 affect the design of the water tower 2.
Compared to the second case, third case increased the head ˜100% but adds only ˜19% to the total mass (from 75 MT to 89 MT) to be lifted. Shape and volume of the vehicle 3 remain the same for both the second and the third cases. Making the head chamber 14 taller would not require changes to the rest of the water tower 2 including the vehicle 3.
USHP can increase the system capacity, within reason, by extending the height of the head chamber 14. This clearly differentiates USHP from VMSW water tower design and operations.
In the third case, MLD 10 is assumed to operate at a reasonable 0.1-m/sec taking ˜20-sec to lift the vehicle 3. In these calculations, an inner diameter of 0.6-m or 2-ft is used for the head chamber 14, which is a relatively large pipe diameter capable of delivering water at ˜1.5-m3/sec. It would take less than 10-sec to fully restore USHP 1 back to the initial settings: close the recycle door 9 and then open the base 16 to reposition the vehicle 3 to the bottom of the lower chamber 11. It is important to balance the MLD 10 lifting speed against power needed to operate the MLD 10.
For these approximate or rough order calculations, once MLD 10 starts lifting the vehicle 3, we have ignored that there is less and less water to be lifted in the upper chamber 12. For the third case, average total mass lifted is ˜74-m3: initially ˜89-m3 and ends with ˜59-m3 as 30-m3 above the vehicle 3 has been pumped into the upper reservoir 4. Also, for simplicity, it is assumed that the vehicle 3 could be compressed 100% when it is more likely that compressibility would be 80% to 90%. These two factors likely will cancel out.
Potential energy available from 30-m3 of water at 100-m, after subtracting energy used to lift the total-mass, is ˜27.7 MJ. For power production, at ˜70% overall efficiency, USHP could generate ˜19.4 MJ every 30 sec generating ˜650 kW—comparable to the output from a 2-MW WTG. Although Energy Calculations are done with 30-m3 vehicle 3 volume, larger the vehicle 3 and taller the head chamber 14, more hydro potential energy could be harvested.
This is a crude estimation, looking primarily at the positive aspects of having a taller head chamber 14. There are engineering difficulties and other considerations by having taller head chamber 14, that will affect the overall performance.
Lifting ˜100 MT or more repeatedly is a difficult task. Either multiple (smaller) units of vehicle 3 could be used in the water tower 2 or the vehicle 3 itself could be segmented into multiple parts and lifted separately.
Time to lift a vehicle 3 depends on several factors, including the total mass USHP must lift and the smallest opening cross section in the upper chamber 12. In the examples considered above, the smallest opening through which USHP pump water is the head chamber 14 with 0.6-m inner diameter. The head chamber 14 diameter needs to be optimized against the total mass as increasing the diameter will increase the head chamber 14 water volume.
In addition to using power to operate an MLD 10, operating the rest of USHP equipment such as a base 16, a recycle door 9, etc. would benefit from having access to the grid, similar to WTGs, for example. USHP needs to have a standalone UPS (uninterruptible power supply) battery backup. As a figure of merit, power needed to operate a base 16 or recycle door 9 would be comparable to operating a garage door, for example, with ˜1 HP motor. The base 16 should close and open quickly.
USIP claims significant changes and differences compared to the VMSW. It may be useful, even if casually, to compare the two systems. By using the same head, it is possible to compare the two systems pumping the same volume of water to their respective upper reservoirs—in about the same time.
Two systems differ in how they pump water into their respective upper reservoirs. USIP uses a vehicle that could be completely contained in its lower chamber, whereas VMSW relies on a positively buoyant driver that spans the entire length of its water tower. In more simple terms, assuming 100-m tall water towers for both, the vehicle 3 takes up ˜2% of the USHP water tower height and the VMSW driver is at least as tall as the VMSW water tower.
USHP lifts a vehicle 3 to pump water in the upper chamber 12 into the upper reservoir 4. The vehicle 3 volume is the upper limit of the pumped water. Vehicle 3 is negatively buoyant and sinks to the bottom of the lower chamber 11 to restore its shape and form when disengaged and not supported by MLD 10. Vehicle 3 has a relatively short height of less than 2-m as discussed above. The vehicle 3 height is the upper limit the vehicle 3 could be lifted.
VMSW moves a driver by changing the water level in the water tower. First, VMSW reduces the wide-section volume, using piston cylinders, to force the water level to rise. Then the driver is released to move up to maintain its neutrally buoyant point. The wide-section transfers water to the upper reservoir which lowers the water level and then the piston cylinders pull back to lower the water level even more. When released, the driver moves down and restores VMSW for repeat operations.
The USHP upper chamber 12 has two parts: a body chamber 13 and a narrow head chamber 14. The shape and volume of the body chamber 13, just above the vehicle 3, are roughly same as those of the vehicle 3. The body chamber 13 provides water for the vehicle 3 to pump into the upper reservoir 4. Cross section of the head chamber 14 is at least an order of magnitude smaller than that of the body chamber 13, and the head chamber 14 dimensions are not constrained by the vehicle 3.
The VMSW upper chamber has three parts, and the driver is present in all of them: narrow-section at the top followed by wide-section and long-section. For the same head, VMSW has to be taller than USHP water tower since the narrow-section of the upper chamber does not contribute to the head as the upper reservoir is at the wide-section level. VMSW would need a ˜1,000 MT driver for a 2-MW capacity system. USHP uses ˜30 MT vehicle 3 to generate the same output.
USHP prefers to use a relatively short and a large diameter vehicle 3, to minimize the amount work to pump water into its upper reservoir 4. For VMSW, increasing the driver diameter makes the entire water tower uniformly larger since the driver has to float following the water level in the water tower.
USHP simultaneously produces and fills a void in the lower chamber 11, while supplying water to an upper reservoir 4—unlike VMSW that requires multiple steps to change the water level in the water tower to move its driver to produce the void. Every additional step taken results in longer cycle time and reduces the system capacity.
According to U.S. Ser. No. 11/415,097B1, the driver, with a radius of 1.7-m and cross section of 9-m2, should be raised ˜3.3-m to produce a void volume of 30-m3 in the VMSW lower chamber, which is the water volume transferred to its upper reservoir in the wide-section. Said differently, the VMSW water tower can't have cross section less than 9-m2 anywhere. As discussed in the Energy Calculations above, the USHP head chamber 14 cross section, which is independent of the vehicle 3 dimensions, is only ˜0.3-m2, 1/30th of VMSW long-section, to pump 30-m3 of water into the upper reservoir 4. Making the vehicle 3 larger does not affect the head section 14 dimensions. Also, USHP could triple the cross section of the head chamber 14 and still be smaller by an order of magnitude compared to that of the VMSW long-section.
These are more of qualitative comparisons, but for USHP, the (compressible) vehicle 3 stays and operates in the lower chamber 11 and does not move into the upper chamber 12 whereas the VMSW driver spans the entire water tower.
For multi-MW capacity systems, water tower 2 could be 100-m or taller—comparable to WTG height. Unlike WTGs, however, USHP could be built and operated next to each other (
Multiple vehicle 3 units could operate in a single water tower 2 with one or more head chamber 14. For each vehicle 3, USHP may require separate lower chamber 11 and recycle door 9. This is a variation of having a segmented vehicle 3 that provides adjustable pumping capacity.
Head chamber 14 essentially could be a very long telescopic pipe that could be extended and retracted. The head chamber 14 could also be built by stacking or connecting multiple pieces.
It is preferred to have multiple units to form a USHP Farm. Each USHP unit operates independently to pump water into an upper reservoir 4 for immediate or later use.
For SPP applications, two or more USHP units could share a common upper reservoir 4 and a common lower reservoir 8 (
USHP could use panels that interlock to form and construct the water tower 2 with strategically placed connecting and support rods. By using liners to make the system watertight, the panels provide rigid structure to the chambers. Much of the water tower 2 could be prefabricated and assembled at the job site. Due to symmetrical shapes of the panels, they can be stacked for transportation and storage. Almost all the materials should be reusable or recyclable.
For SPP applications, building and operating USHP in extreme cold environment requires, for example, additional insulation, use of heating coils, use of salt water to lower the freezing temperature, and circulating water continuously. It is preferred to operate USHP in an enclosed environment.
The preferred embodiments of the present invention provide innovative ways to recycle and supply a large volume of water from a lower reservoir to an upper reservoir for various applications including generating electricity. USHP substantially reduces the VMSW water tower dimensions introducing various vehicle designs to push or pump water in the upper chamber into an upper reservoir.
The USHP water tower has a unique combination of a lower chamber, designed for a vehicle to operate inside, and a slim upper chamber. The upper chamber further comprises a body chamber, just above the lower chamber, to provide water for the vehicle to be pumped, and a tall and slender head chamber.
The vehicle could take many different forms and shapes. USHP prefers a vehicle with compressible walls and a bottom base. With the base closed, the vehicle separates the lower chamber and upper chamber with no fluid communication between the chambers.
As the vehicle is lifted producing a void in the lower chamber, water from a lower reservoir fills the void real-time through a recycle door. Closing the recycle door and then opening the base combines all waters in the water tower that now includes the water that filled the void. For power production applications, there is no difference between the recycled water added to the lower chamber and the water that was in the water tower already.
The vehicle is denser than water. With the base open, the vehicle will restore its own form and reposition itself, with the MLD lowered, at the bottom of the lower chamber. This is an important feature for restoring the initial settings for repeat operations.
For both PSH and SPP applications, released water from the upper reservoir through a penstock turns a turbine generator, located at the ground level, to generate electricity. Hydro discharge or exiting water out of a turbine generator collect in the lower reservoir for reuse.
USHP is scalable. For hydropower systems, the head is proportional to the height of the upper chamber. Also, the larger the void, more water is pumped into the upper reservoir. The void in the lower chamber is determined by the vehicle's movement or change in its volume.
Since each USHP unit operates independently, a USHP farm with multiple units could operate continuously while allowing for rolling maintenance, repairs, and upgrades at the individual unit level. USHP farm could share a common lower reservoir and a common upper reservoir for more compact formations.
Although the invention has been explained in relation to its preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that many other possible modifications and variations can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.