Utilization of coloration to improve the detection of “hit or miss” defects when using scanner equipment and an automated saw to remove defects in wood pieces

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7926524
  • Patent Number
    7,926,524
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, October 2, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 19, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
In a wood processing plant, planks are typically split into strips and then passed through an automated cross-cutting saw station to remove defects such as knots, cracks or flash. One defect which also occurs is the hit and miss defect caused by a planer and/or a sander. In order to improve the performance of the cross-cutting saw station, color is applied to the wood prior to being planed and sanded. The cross-cutting saw station is then modified to optically inspect the wood for the presence of color, indicating a hit and miss defect, and to remove the portions of the wood containing color.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The manufacturing process of the present invention teaches how to use a coloration system to highlight areas where the sand belt or knives of a planer did not hit the wood properly. The remaining coloured area will be detected more efficiently by a color camera used in the scanner equipment used in the wood industry to detect all kinds of wood defects.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

General Description of the Manufacturing Process of Laminated Hardwood Floors


Currently, high-strength hardwood floors are manufactured by cutting hardwood planks into small strips and subsequently reassembling the strips into 12 in. wide 50 ft. truck floor planks. Before being ripped into small strips, the hardwood plank needs to be sanded or planed on both its top and bottom surfaces. Usually, a rough 4/4 dried hardwood plank has a thickness of between 1 inch to 1.125 inch. During the sanding or planing process, the thickness of the board is reduced and will reach generally between 0.80 and 0.96 inches. It should be noted however that the surface preparation can be done before the hardwood plank is ripped or after. This process is necessary because it prepares the surface of the wood where the glue will be applied. Indeed, the width of the small strip will become the thickness of the laminated floor. The top and the bottom of the plank are the parts where glue will be applied. The surfaces need to be smooth and even on both sides with little tolerance (5 or 7 mils) between both surfaces. The preparation of the wood surfaces is very important. Improperly prepared wood surfaces will create problems during the gluing process or undesirable defects on the final product.


The next phase of manufacture is to remove the defects in the sticks. Some defects such as knots, crack, flash, bark, etc., are the result of variations in the raw wood supply and are removed for both structural and cosmetic reasons. Other defects can be the result of lack of processing during the preparation of the wood surfaces. During the wood surface preparation, for some reason, some surface areas of the sticks have not been hit properly by the sandpaper of the sanding machine or knives of the planer. Those areas are called “hit or miss defects”, which means that the sticks do not have the adequate surface preparation to receive the glue. Those areas have to be removed as a defect or the sticks themselves having that defect are removed and must be re-sanded or re-planed in smaller dimensions before being used further in the process into a special batch using narrower sticks.


Once the strips are cleaned of their defects, glue is applied on the appropriate surfaces and then they are glued together using an appropriate adhesive that is cured in a high frequency press. After the assembled plank exits the high frequency press, it is planed to final thickness. At this phase in the manufacturing operation, cosmetic defects are repaired and the boards are prepped for painting.


The prepared boards are then sent through an automated painting line where they are coated with approximately 3 to 4 mils of water-based paint.


Method to Remove Defects on the Sticks


Presently, in North American manufactured laminated floors, the defects in the wood sticks are removed manually by a highly skilled and trained person. With a cross cutter saw operated manually, the skilled person cuts the wood on each side of the defects to remove the defects from the sticks.


But there is a possibility that the defects can be also removed automatically by using new technology which uses a scanner and an automated cross cutting saw. The scanner detects (with sensors such as a camera, X-ray, micro wave, ultrasound, infrared laser, etc.) the defects on the sticks. The computer to which the scanner is operatively connected sends the information (location of the defect on the sticks) to an automated cross cutting saw which is adapted to remove the defects previously detected by the scanner.


The scanner can use different methods to detect hit or miss defects. One of the methods is to detect hit or miss defects by measuring the dimensions of the sticks. This measurement can be done using optical triangulation technology using laser sensors. If the dimension (in that the case the thickness of the stick) is more or less than a predetermined target, the scanner will deduce that there is a hit or miss defect. Another method consists in detecting the hit-or-miss defect with a camera. In this method, the color tone variation between the hit-or-miss defect and the immediate area next to it provides an indication of the defect. This technique will deduce a hit-or-miss defect on the stick when there is a variation of color tone on the wood surface. Finally, the hit-or-miss defect can be also detected by applying, manually, coloured marks on the sticks before the sticks go into the scanner. The sensor (usually a camera) in the scanner will recognize the mark (not the defect itself) and it will be identified as an area where there is a defect to be removed. All these techniques can be used separately or in combination.


These techniques have some problems which limit the efficiency of the detection of the hit or miss defect on the sticks.


When the dimension approach is used, problems occur when the hit-or-miss defects are in the range of the tolerance of the sanding or planning process.


Assuming that the tolerance of the sanding process is around 7 mils, at the exit of the sanding machine the thickness of the sticks will be between 0.916 and 0.93 inches. If the scanner is adjusted to not recognize as a hit or miss defect any variation under 7 mils and that some hit or miss defects are in that range, missed detection will occur (some hit or miss defects will not be detected and will not be removed). On the other hand, if the scanner sensitivity detection is increased above 7 mils, the false detection will occur creating an increase of waste (the scanner will detect hit or miss defects incorrectly).


In the case that the color tone variation method is used to detect hit-or-miss defect, problems occur when color tone variation related to hit-or-miss conflicts with the natural coloration of the wood itself. It is extremely difficult for a camera (black and white) to distinguish between variations of tone of the natural coloration of hardwood and variations of tone due to a hit or miss defect.


In the case when coloured marks are applied manually, the extra labour cost decreases the advantages of using the scanner and cross cutter saw technology. The investment in the automated detection is justified economically by the reduction of the number of people on the production line. If, after making the investment, it takes people to put the coloured marks, the reduction of the labour cost almost disappears. Another problem with the coloured mark is human mistakes which will increase the waste.


For these reasons, the detection of the hit-or-miss defect using these techniques, in the discussed case here, are not accurate, economically inefficient and could create problems: defects which are not removed reduce the quality of the finished product or good wood is identified as defect when it should not be, increasing the waste of the raw material.


Tests have shown that 5% of the sticks at the exit of the automated saw have to be rejected because of the presence of hit or miss defects. At the same time, the improper cuts increase the waste by at least 2%. The false detection of the hit or miss defect can create even more doubt on the economic viability of the use of the scanner in the manufacturing process of hardwood laminated floors or any other manufacturing process in the wood industry where hit or miss defects are important to detect.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the invention to provide a process for identifying hit or miss defects in wood processed by an automated cross-cutting saw station.


Thus, in one aspect the invention provides a process for detecting hit or miss defects in wood, comprising the steps of:

    • (a) applying color to top and bottom surfaces of wood;
    • (b) prepping said wood by processing said wood in at least one of a planer, at least one of a sander, or a combination thereof;
    • (c) ripping a wood plank into wood strips;
    • (d) processing said strips in a scanning station consisting of a scanner and a cross-cutting saw operatively associated with said scanner, said scanner being adapted to scan said strips for the presence of defects and to control said cross-cutting saw to cut said strips in order to remove portions of said strips containing defects;
    • wherein said scanner is further adapted to scan said strips of wood for the presence of color on said top and bottom surfaces, and to control the cross-cutting saw to remove portions of said strips which include color.


In another aspect, in a plant for processing wood strips and for removing from said wood strips defects, said plant being of the type comprising:

    • a ripping station for ripping a wood board into a plurality of wood strips;
    • a prepping station for processing wood, said prepping station including at least one of a planer, at least one of a sander or a combination thereof;
    • a scanning station comprising a scanner and a cross-cutting saw operatively connected to said scanner, said scanner being adapted to scan said wood strips for the presence of defects and to control said cross-cutting saw to remove from said strips said defects,
    • the improvement being characterized in that:
    • said plant further includes a painting station for applying color to top and bottom surfaces of wood, and in that
    • said scanner is further adapted to identify portions of said wood strips which contain color and control said cross-cutting saw to remove said portions of said wood strips which contain color.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will be better understood after having read a description of a preferred embodiment thereof, made with reference to the following drawings in which:



FIGS. 1
a and 1b show a rough board without colorant prior to sanding;



FIGS. 2
a and 2b show a board without colorant after sanding;



FIGS. 3
a and 3b show a rough board with color prior to sanding;



FIGS. 4
a and 4b show a board with color after sanding;



FIGS. 5
a, 5b and 5c show a board with a knot;



FIGS. 6
a and 6b show a board with a crack;



FIGS. 7
a and 7b show a board with flash;



FIGS. 8
a and 8b show a board with hit or miss defects colored blue after sanding;



FIG. 9 shows a board with no defects;



FIGS. 10
a, 10b and 10c are schematic representations of a wood processing plant including the improvement of the present invention, where stations are ordered differently; and



FIG. 11 is a schematic representation of a painting station according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.





DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION

The manufacturing technique provided by the present invention increases the detection efficiency of the hit-or-miss defect without adding labour. The end results are an increase in the quality of the finished product with a reduction of the presence of improper defects in the finished product and a reduction of the waste created by improper detection.


The technique is to use a colorant which is applied, such as by spraying, on all plank surfaces before the sanding or planing process. The remaining coloured spots after the plank is sanded or planed will be detected more easily by the camera used by the scanner.


Several tests have been done in order to select the right combination of colour and camera which gives the best results.


Initially, black was applied to the planks, and a black and white camera was used in the scanner. The results were good but there were still some problems. The natural wood coloration also includes in its range a dark colour which resembles the black coloring used, creating false detection. It thus appeared that the use of a colour which is not naturally present into the natural ranges of colours of the wood would improve results. Red, green, blue and yellow colors have been tested with the utilization of a color camera in the scanner. The results have met expectations and an increase of close to 100% of efficiency of the detection of the hit or miss defect was observed. The use of red, green and blue color with the use of a color camera, to date, gives the best results of detection.


The use of wood coloration technique creates also surprising beneficial side effects. It improves the detection of other defects, such as cracks, knots, flash, etc. Curiously, it also improves the longevity of the sand paper (or the planer knife) by 15% creating savings which easily cover the cost of the colorant. It seems that the humidification of the hardwood plank surface softens the hardwood, making it easier for the sand paper or planer knife to sand or plane the surfaces.


The use of the coloration technique increases the quality of the finished product by reducing the presence of improper defects into the finished product and reduces the raw material lost due to mistakes in the detection of hit or miss defects. The new manufacturing technique using coloration has also insured the economic viability, maximizing the return on investment of the use of scanner and of an automated cross cutter saw. The use of the scanner in the manufacturing process of laminated hardwood floors provides a significant competitive advantage by reducing the cost of labour and increasing the yield of the raw material.


Thus, the process of one aspect of the present invention consists in applying a layer of color to the surface of wood used in the manufacturing of wood planks, particularly for the trailer or container industry.


Referring now to FIGS. 10a, 10b and 10c, the invention finds use in plants generally consisting of a ripping station, a prepping station, and a scanning station.


The ripping station 25 is adapted to process a wood board into a plurality of wood strips.


The prepping station 20 consists of at least one of a sander 22, a planer 21, or a combination thereof. Indeed, some older plants only use a sander, or two in cascade, whereas most plants today use a planer followed by a sander. However, the invention also contemplates plants provided only with one or more planers. The prepping station preps the wood (either boards or strips) by preparing the top and bottom surfaces, i.e. essentially smoothing the surfaces to provide a surface which can receive an appropriate adhesive further down the manufacturing line.


The scanning station 24 consists of a scanner 23 and a cross-cutting saw operatively associated with the scanner 23. The scanner is adapted to scan the wood strips for the presence of defects, and to control or instruct the cross-cutting saw to cross-cut the wood strips in order to remove the portions of the wood strips which contain the defects so identified by the scanner. A person skilled in the art will recognize that such scanning stations are well known in the art, and no further details will be provided herein. The reader will also appreciate that literary liberty is taken with the expressions used to describe the scanning station. Indeed, the scanner is an optical device which obtains information as the piece of wood traverses the scanning area. This information is analyzed and processed by a processor, and the result of the processing is used to direct the cross-cutting saw to appropriately cut the piece of wood. In this sense, the scanner “controls” the cross-cutting saw.



FIGS. 10
a
10
b and 10c show different configurations for such plants, where the order of the different stations described herein differs.


A painting station 27 is further provided for painting the wood (either boards or strips depending on the configuration of the plant).


It is easier to apply color to the boards as opposed to the strips, but a person skilled in the art will recognize that both possibilities are encompassed by the scope of the present invention.


In order to optimize the process according to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the color is preferably red, green or blue (or a combination thereof). What is to be noted is that the color is preferably selected to be a color which is not naturally present in the wood coloring.


Furthermore, the spraying or painting of the wood in the painting station is adapted to cover the surface of the stick or board with a layer of coloring which is adapted to provided color to the surface, but preferably not penetrate too deeply into the wood (otherwise the depth of color will be greater than the thickness of the wood that is removed by planing and sanding, which would render the process useless). In a preferred embodiment, paint is sprayed in a proportion of approximately 5 mL per square foot. For such a proportion, the colorant used is in the proportion of 1 part colorant for 140 parts water. Of course, the invention does not lie in the specifics of the density of the spraying nor in the dilution of the colorant, which may vary depending on the base colorant used (a thinner colorant will require less water than a thicker colorant). FIG. 11 is a schematic representation of a preferred embodiment for the painting station, where the top and bottom surfaces of the wood are painted simultaneously, in a transverse line. However, other configurations which will meet the objects of the present invention are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.


The color camera used in the scanning station is either provided with an optical filter to highlight portions of the stick which still have the color, or the signal received from the camera is processed to focus on a certain wavelength. Preferably, the color cameras (one for the top and one for the bottom) are linear cameras of 900 pixels (but of course the preferred embodiment is not limited thereto). The images captured by the camera are preferably 1 pixel wide by 900 pixels long, and taken at predetermined intervals. In the context of the preferred embodiment described herein, the wood is preferably scanned at intervals of 1.5 mm.


The information obtained from the scanner is further used to control or instruct the cross-cutting saw, so that in addition to the usual defects, portions of the wood stick which still contain color are removed from the wood sticks.


Referring now to FIGS. 1a to 8b, there is illustrated a variety of pieces of wood showing, in sequence, rough boards prior to sanding (1a, 1b), boards without colorant after sanding (2a, 2b), rough boards with colorant prior to sanding (3a, 3b), boards showing hit and miss defects after sanding (4a, 4b), boards or strips with knot defects (5a, 5b, 5c), strips with cracks (6a, 6b), strips with flash (7a, 7b) and strips with hit or miss defects colored blue (8a, 8b).



FIG. 9 shows a strip with no defects.


The sticks processed according to a preferred embodiment of the invention described herein are substantially free of defects, and the use of coloration decreases the waste material, as well as decreases the number of sticks which still have hit or miss defects.


Although the present invention has been explained hereinabove by way of a preferred embodiment thereof, it should be pointed out that any modifications to this preferred embodiment within the scope of the appended claims is not deemed to alter or change the nature and scope of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A process for detecting hit or miss defects in wood, comprising the steps of: (a) applying color to a top surface and a bottom surface of said wood;(b) after step (a), prepping said wood by processing said top and bottom surfaces of said wood in at least one of a planer or a sander, or a combination thereof;(c) ripping said wood into wood strips;(d) after steps (b) and (c), processing said strips in a scanning station comprising a scanner and a cross-cutting saw operatively associated with said scanner, said scanner being adapted to scan said strips for the presence of defects and to control said cross-cutting saw to cut said strips in order to remove portions of said strips containing defects; and(e) after steps (b) and (c), scanning said strips of wood for the presence of color on said top and bottom surfaces which remains after said prepping, and controlling the cross-cutting saw to remove portions of said strips which include color.
  • 2. A process according to claim 1, wherein said step (c) occurs after said step (a) and before said step (b).
  • 3. A process according to claim 1, wherein said step (c) occurs before said step (a).
  • 4. A process according to claim 1, wherein said step (b) consists in processing said wood in a planer.
  • 5. A process according to claim 1, wherein said step (b) consists in processing said wood in at least one sander.
  • 6. A process according to claim 5, wherein said step (b) consists in processing said wood in two sanders one after the other.
  • 7. A process according to claim 1, wherein said step (b) consists in processing said wood in a planer followed by a sander.
  • 8. A process according to claim 1, wherein said color is selected from the group consisting of red, green and blue.
  • 9. A process according to claim 1, wherein said color is a color that is different from color naturally occurring in said wood.
  • 10. In a plant for processing wood strips and for removing from said wood strips defects, said plant being of the type comprising: a ripping station for ripping a wood board into a plurality of wood strips;a prepping station for processing a top surface and a bottom surface of either said wood board or said plurality of wood strips, said prepping station including at least one of a planer or a sander or a combination thereof;a scanning station comprising a scanner and a cross-cutting saw operatively connected to said scanner, said scanner being adapted to scan said wood strips for the presence of defects and to control said cross-cutting saw to remove from said strips said defects,wherein said plant further includes a painting station for applying color to the top surface and the bottom surface of either said wood board or said plurality of wood strips before being processed at the prepping station, andwherein said scanner is further adapted to identify portions of said wood strips which contain color remaining after said processing by said prepping station and control said cross-cutting saw to remove said portions of said wood strips which contain color.
  • 11. A plant according to claim 10, wherein said wood plant is arranged so that wood first enters said painting station, followed by said prepping station, followed by said ripping station, followed by said scanning station.
  • 12. A plant according to claim 10, wherein said wood plant is arranged so that wood first enters said ripping station, followed by said painting station, followed by said prepping station, followed by said scanning station.
  • 13. A plant according to claim 10, wherein said wood plant is arranged so that wood first enters said painting station, followed by said ripping station, followed by said prepping station, followed by said scanning station.
  • 14. A plant according to claim 10, wherein said color is a color that is different from color naturally occurring in said piece of wood.
  • 15. A plant according to claim 10, wherein said color is selected from the group consisting of red, green and blue.
US Referenced Citations (151)
Number Name Date Kind
1487255 Magelssen Mar 1924 A
2537343 Golick et al. Jan 1951 A
2588580 Schruggs Mar 1952 A
3037900 Hings et al. Jun 1962 A
3262723 Strickler Jul 1966 A
3315380 Mack, III et al. Apr 1967 A
3563403 Luisada et al. Feb 1971 A
3565741 Jaray Feb 1971 A
3681883 Ehrlich Aug 1972 A
3751864 Berger et al. Aug 1973 A
3780777 Davies Dec 1973 A
3848284 Livingston Nov 1974 A
3852930 Naaman Dec 1974 A
3857217 Reps Dec 1974 A
3927705 Cromeens et al. Dec 1975 A
3941904 Hoh et al. Mar 1976 A
3942021 Barr et al. Mar 1976 A
3974303 Iwase et al. Aug 1976 A
4016232 Pringle Apr 1977 A
4019301 Fox Apr 1977 A
4020123 Trapasso Apr 1977 A
4081148 Murphy Mar 1978 A
4083743 Degens Apr 1978 A
4095634 Berglund et al. Jun 1978 A
4121855 Mortenson Oct 1978 A
4128119 Maier Dec 1978 A
4146672 Jasperson Mar 1979 A
4158712 Degens Jun 1979 A
4158713 Degens Jun 1979 A
4158778 Gard et al. Jun 1979 A
4180413 Diederich Dec 1979 A
4188445 Hill Feb 1980 A
4190686 Muis Feb 1980 A
4220115 Brossman et al. Sep 1980 A
4234648 Patz et al. Nov 1980 A
4265981 Campbell May 1981 A
4288957 Meehan Sep 1981 A
4294647 Strickler Oct 1981 A
4295910 Cooley et al. Oct 1981 A
4307883 Kelly Dec 1981 A
4316925 Delmonte Feb 1982 A
4323615 Sauder Apr 1982 A
4364993 Edelman et al. Dec 1982 A
4378402 Below Mar 1983 A
4443520 Braithwaite, Jr. Apr 1984 A
4489121 Luckanuck Dec 1984 A
4496613 Zagefka et al. Jan 1985 A
4500387 Embury Feb 1985 A
4520057 Fujii et al. May 1985 A
4526418 Martin Jul 1985 A
4528231 Lund Jul 1985 A
4543765 Barrett Oct 1985 A
4614555 Smith et al. Sep 1986 A
4620892 Dodson et al. Nov 1986 A
4624295 Howland Nov 1986 A
4674745 Speranza Jun 1987 A
4683689 Loggy Aug 1987 A
4706424 Garapick et al. Nov 1987 A
4731140 Yontrarak Mar 1988 A
4735851 Dodson et al. Apr 1988 A
4801483 Beckerman et al. Jan 1989 A
4857578 Hall Aug 1989 A
4880584 Jones et al. Nov 1989 A
4897286 Kosuda et al. Jan 1990 A
4904328 Beecher et al. Feb 1990 A
4913485 Moffatt et al. Apr 1990 A
4931113 Feichtmeir et al. Jun 1990 A
4938265 Mountz Jul 1990 A
4957801 Maranci et al. Sep 1990 A
5026600 Akao Jun 1991 A
5041322 Fouquet Aug 1991 A
5054843 Gray Oct 1991 A
5055156 Marino et al. Oct 1991 A
5059472 Le Bell et al. Oct 1991 A
5106446 Beck et al. Apr 1992 A
5117603 Weintraub Jun 1992 A
5135598 Kobe et al. Aug 1992 A
5135793 Socha Aug 1992 A
5143418 Fouquet Sep 1992 A
5153058 Hall et al. Oct 1992 A
5162407 Turner Nov 1992 A
5166302 Werner et al. Nov 1992 A
5187000 Chow et al. Feb 1993 A
5190607 Werner et al. Mar 1993 A
5198481 Cope Mar 1993 A
5207172 Wolter May 1993 A
5209983 Case et al. May 1993 A
5236754 McBride et al. Aug 1993 A
5273787 Gnatowski Dec 1993 A
5277479 Koyama et al. Jan 1994 A
5316834 Matsuda et al. May 1994 A
5336304 Andoe Aug 1994 A
5362545 Tingley Nov 1994 A
5380131 Crawford Jan 1995 A
5407517 Hänsel et al. Apr 1995 A
5498460 Tingley Mar 1996 A
5501054 Soltis et al. Mar 1996 A
5509715 Scharpf Apr 1996 A
5519094 Tseng et al. May 1996 A
5597024 Bolyard et al. Jan 1997 A
5599895 Heider Feb 1997 A
5603798 Bhat Feb 1997 A
5633074 Muroi et al. May 1997 A
5639807 Secrist et al. Jun 1997 A
5648137 Blackmore Jul 1997 A
5679191 Robinson Oct 1997 A
5695884 Ishimaru et al. Dec 1997 A
5710215 Abend Jan 1998 A
5719239 Mirous et al. Feb 1998 A
5730485 Sjostedt et al. Mar 1998 A
5750616 Shimpuku et al. May 1998 A
5776406 Schubert et al. Jul 1998 A
5788908 Murakami Aug 1998 A
5824373 Biller et al. Oct 1998 A
5827393 Kinzelmann et al. Oct 1998 A
5866656 Hung et al. Feb 1999 A
5928735 Padmanabhan et al. Jul 1999 A
5930967 Stoehr et al. Aug 1999 A
5960104 Conners et al. Sep 1999 A
5968630 Foster Oct 1999 A
5985397 Witt et al. Nov 1999 A
6025053 Grenier Feb 2000 A
6037049 Tingley Mar 2000 A
6042765 Sugahara et al. Mar 2000 A
6043313 Brink et al. Mar 2000 A
6060163 Naaman May 2000 A
6077610 Correll et al. Jun 2000 A
6082421 Nicol et al. Jul 2000 A
6089297 Shibagaki et al. Jul 2000 A
6093359 Gauchel et al. Jul 2000 A
6103155 Uchida et al. Aug 2000 A
6106944 Heikkila et al. Aug 2000 A
6123882 Uchida et al. Sep 2000 A
6124393 Haraguchi et al. Sep 2000 A
6135531 Allen et al. Oct 2000 A
6179942 Padmanabhan Jan 2001 B1
6183824 Padmanabhan et al. Feb 2001 B1
6189682 Hill Feb 2001 B1
6277771 Nishimura et al. Aug 2001 B1
6318794 Bérubé Nov 2001 B1
6558765 Padmanabhan May 2003 B2
6558766 Padmanabhan et al. May 2003 B2
6601357 Tunis Aug 2003 B2
6811877 Haislet et al. Nov 2004 B2
6843877 Risi Jan 2005 B2
6957675 Risi Oct 2005 B2
7144625 Tunis Dec 2006 B2
20050266200 Padmanabhan Dec 2005 A1
20060101754 Risi May 2006 A1
20060179733 Padmanabhan Aug 2006 A1
20080099105 Kelly May 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
2 224 213 Dec 1996 CA
2 314 306 Jan 2001 CA
2 526 767 Dec 2006 CA
198 35 075 Feb 2000 DE
1473849 Mar 1967 FR
6-280375 Oct 1994 JP
2001-123579 May 2001 JP
WO 0174552 Oct 2001 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080236704 A1 Oct 2008 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60848383 Oct 2006 US