Utilizing black powder for electrolytes for flow batteries

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11495814
  • Patent Number
    11,495,814
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 21, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 8, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
A method and systems are provided for utilizing black powder to form an electrolyte for a flow battery. In an exemplary method the black powder is heated under an inert atmosphere to form Fe3O4. The Fe3O4 is dissolved in an acid solution to form an electrolyte solution. A ratio of iron (II) to iron (III) is adjusted by a redox process.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to producing electrolytes for flow batteries.


BACKGROUND

Energy storage is currently one of the major challenges in the deployment of renewable energy resources and the improvement of the electrical grid efficiency. Flow batteries are among the most promising storage options and have the potential to be cheaper and more flexible than other competitors. A flow battery is an energy storage technology that stores electrical energy as chemical energy in flowing solutions. converts and and release it in a controlled manner when required. It is worth noting that the design of a flow battery allows for the separation between power and energy capacity that keeps the cost low for large scale application and also, facilitates matching with various loads/applications.


SUMMARY

An embodiment described herein provides a method for forming electrolyte solutions for a flow battery from black powder. The method includes heating the black powder under an inert atmosphere to form Fe3O4, dissolving the Fe3O4 in an acid solution to form an electrolyte solution, and adjusting a ratio of iron (II) to iron (III) by a redox process.


Another embodiment described herein provides an electrolyte for a flow battery, including a solution of iron ions formed from black powder that has been heat-treated to be converted to Fe3O4, and dissolved in an acidic solution.


Another embodiment described herein provides a flow battery including a catholyte including iron ions formed from black powder that has been heat-treated to be converted to Fe3O4 and then dissolved in an acidic solution.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A is a drawing of a flow battery using two electrolytes.



FIG. 1B is a drawing of an Fe/Fe flow battery that uses a single electrolyte solution, the catholyte, and a solid iron anode.



FIG. 2 is bar chart that shows the typical major mineral composition a black powder without treatment.



FIG. 3 is a process flow diagram of a method converting black powder to an iron electrolyte for use in a flow battery.



FIG. 4 is a bar chart that shows the mineral composition of black powder after treatment at 400° C. under an inert gas.



FIG. 5 is a bar chart that shows the mineral composition of black powder after treatment at 775° C. in air.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The electrolyte represents about 30% to about 40% of the total cost of a flow battery. As electrolytes have generally been very costly, this has limited the wide spread deployment of flow batteries. Accordingly, lower cost electrolyte materials would allow for greater adoption of flow cells. Cost reduction can be achieved by utilizing low value materials as the main raw materials for electrolyte synthesis. Waste materials, such as black powder from pipelines, are present in large quantities and are underutilized.


The techniques described herein provide for the formation of iron-containing electrolytes for flow batteries using black powder has the primary raw material. As the black powder is an abundant waste material, the costs of the electrolyte are substantially reduced.


As used herein, black powder is a solid contaminant often found in hydrocarbon pipelines. The material may be wet, for example, having a tar-like appearance. The black powder be a very fine, dry powder. Black powder can include mill scale, such as magnetite or Fe3O4, which originates from the pipe manufacturing process as steel is oxidized at high temperatures. These types of solids strongly adhere to pipe walls and are not easily removed. Further, black powder can include flash rust, such as Fe2O3 and FeOOH, from water exposure during hydrotesting. Black powder can also be formed by internal pipeline corrosion, such as caused by microbial action, acid gas corrosion, or both. Black powder can also be a carryover from gas gathering systems.


Black powder is regarded as a chronic nuisance waste that is removed from valuable process streams by the use of filter bags, separators, or cyclones, among others. Limited efforts have been exerted to utilize black powder, despite its availability in large amounts at almost no cost.


In some embodiments described herein, the black powder is tested for contamination by naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM). NORM may include decay products formed from uranium and thorium in subsurface deposits. For example, lead-210 may be present in some black powders. However, as the materials generally decay quickly and lead-210 is a long-lived isotope, most black powder deposits are relatively free of NORM. This allows the use of black powder for other applications. However, if the black powder includes lead-210, or other norm, the black powder may be discarded.


Accordingly, the black powder can be used as the main raw material to synthesize iron based electrolyte solutions. The electrolyte solutions may be used in Fe/V, Fe/Fe and/or Fe/V mixed chloride and sulfide flow batteries, as well as in electrolytes used in fixed installation (non-flow type) batteries.



FIG. 1A is a drawing of a flow battery 100 using two electrolytes. In the flow battery 100, the energy is stored in electrolytes 102 and 104, which are termed anolyte 102 and catholyte 104, herein. The electrolytes 102 and 104 are stored in tanks 106 and 108 and are separately pumped from the tanks 106 and 108 to an electrochemical cell 110 by dedicated pumps 112.


In some embodiments, an ion exchange membrane 114 is used in the electrochemical cell 110. The ion exchange membrane 114 separates the electrolytes 102 and 104 to prevent energy loss by short-circuiting, while allowing protons, or other ions, to pass between the sides during charge and discharge cycles. In some embodiments, the ion exchange membrane 114 is a sulfonated tetrafluoroethylene, commercially available as NAFION® from DuPont Chemical of Wilmington Va. The ion exchange membrane 114 generally controls the efficiency of the flow battery 100, and is a significant contributor to the cost of the flow battery 100. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the ion exchange membrane 114 is omitted and the electrolytes 102 and 104 are generally kept from mixing by laminar flow or is made unnecessary by battery design, such as if a single electrolyte solution is used.


As the electrolytes 102 and 104 are pumped through the electrochemical cell 110, they pass through channels 116 and 118. The channels 116 and 118 may include a porous electrode material, such as felt, or Rainey nickel, among others, to allow ions and electrons to flow between the electrolytes 102 and 104. In some embodiments, for example, when the ion exchange membrane 114 is omitted, the channels 116 and 118 may be narrow to enhance laminar flow.


During the production of power, the anolyte 102 is oxidized, losing electrons to the anode current collector 120. The electrons are transferred by a line 122 to a load 124. After powering the load 124, the electrons are returned to the electrochemical cell 110 by another line 126. The electrons reenter the electrochemical cell 110 from the cathode current collector 128, reducing the catholyte 104.


The anolyte 102 and catholyte 104 are regenerated during a charging cycle when a power source 130 removes electrons from the cathode current collector 128 through a line 132, oxidizing the catholyte 104 to its initial state. The electrons are provided to the anode current collector 120 from the power source 130 through another line 134, reducing the anolyte 102 to its initial state.


One of the most established technologies for flow batteries is based on vanadium redox chemistry and is termed the vanadium redox flow battery (VRB). In VRBs, vanadium ions are dissolved in an aqueous acid supporting electrolyte. VRBs are often based on V2+/V3+ and V4+/V5+ redox couples. However, VRBs have high costs for the vanadium-based electrolytes and for the Nafion membranes, providing incentives for lower cost materials.


Accordingly, a flow battery based on Fe/V redox chemistry has been explored as a potential option for lowering costs for large scale energy storage, as iron is lower cost than vanadium. In an Fe/V flow battery, during the discharge cycle of the flow battery, the catholyte 104 includes Fe(III) which is reduced to Fe(II) at the cathode current collector 128 (+), while the anolyte 102 includes V(II) which is oxidized to V(III) at the anode current collector 120 (−), according to the reactions shown below:

Fe3++e→Fe2+  (1)
V2+→V3++e  (2)
Fe3++V2+→V3++Fe2+  (3)



FIG. 1B is a drawing of an Fe/Fe flow battery 200 that uses a single electrolyte solution, the catholyte 104, and an iron anode 202. In this embodiment, during discharge, iron (III) chloride in the catholyte 104 is reduced to iron (II) chloride at the cathode current collector 128. At the iron anode 202, iron is oxidized to iron (II) chloride and dissolved into the catholyte 104. The iron anode 202 also functions as the anode current collector, eliminated the need for any additional current collectors. These processes are reversed during battery charging. During charging of the iron-chloride redox flow battery, iron (0) is deposited on the surface of the iron anode 202 by the electrochemical reduction of ferrous ions, while the catholyte 104 is regenerated to iron (III) chloride. As only one electrolyte solution is used, no ion exchange membrane 114 is used, further decreasing the cost. In some embodiments, the source of iron is black powder, either as FeCl2 directly or by the electrochemical reduction of FeCl3 to FeCl2.


In some embodiments, the Fe/Fe flow battery does not use an iron anode 202, but uses two electrolyte solutions, an anolyte that includes FeCl2 and a catholyte that includes FeCl3 and FeCl2. In these embodiments, an ion exchange membrane 114 is used in the configuration shown in FIG. 1A.


Examples


FIG. 2 is a bar chart that shows the typical major mineral composition of black powder without treatment. In many cases, black powder is regenerative debris that is formed inside natural gas pipelines as a result of corrosion of the internal walls of the pipeline. It can also be collected from upstream filters or filter bags used in gas refineries. The primary component in the sample is magnetite (Fe3O4) at about 68.5%. The sample also includes iron oxide or hematite (Fe2O3), at about 20.9%, as well as quartz (SiO2), at about 10.6%. In other examples, the materials including, for example, metal carbonates, metal hydroxides, and sulfide iron carbonates may be present.


Preparation of Black Powder for Use in an Electrolyte



FIG. 3 is a process flow diagram of a method 300 for converting black powder to an iron electrolyte for use in a flow battery. As described in embodiments herein, black powder is used as the iron source for iron based flow-batteries. This may be achieved by converting the iron in the black powder to iron (II) chloride or iron (III) chloride, for example, by the techniques of the method 300. The method 300 begins at block 302.


At block 302, the black powder is heated under an inert atmosphere to form magnetite (Fe3O4), as described with respect to FIG. 4. At block 304, the resulting magnetite is dissolved in HCl (aq), or an acid mixture that includes sulfides, sulfites, sulfates, nitrites, or nitrates, among others, to form iron (II) chloride and iron (III) chloride. At block 306, the concentration ratio of the iron (II) chloride to iron (III) chloride is adjusted, for example, by electrochemical reduction of iron (III) chloride.



FIG. 4 is a bar chart that shows the mineral composition of the black powder after treatment at 400° C. under an inert gas. Initially, the black powder is heat-treated at about 400° C. to about 700° C., under nitrogen, to convert the iron content to magnetite (Fe3O4). The heat treatment converts the black powder to a blend of about 97.7% magnetite (Fe3O4) and about 2.3% quartz (SiO2), as depicted in Equation 4.










Black





Powder






N
2

Δ





Fe
3



O
4






(
4
)








FIG. 5 is a bar chart that shows the mineral composition of black powder after treatment at 775° C. under air to form hematite or Fe2O3. As this chart indicates, the oxygen free environment provided by the inert atmosphere (N2) is important in the black powder transformation, since treating the black powder under an oxygen containing environment, such as air, will result in the formation of ferric oxide, Fe2O3, which is not a good precursor for forming FeCl3.


Preparation of Anolyte and Catholyte Solutions


After the heat treatment to form the magnetite (Fe3O4), the electrolytes can be prepared at room temperature using deionized (DI) water. This may be performed by preparing a solution of HCl, or a mixture of acids, at a concentration of about 1 to about 6 molar (M) in the DI water.


To prepare the electrolytes for an Fe/V flow battery from the black powder, the appropriate metal sources are dissolved in the HCl(aq) or acid solution. For the anolyte, VCl3, VOSO4, or both is dissolved in HCl(aq) form a solution of vanadium with a concentration of about 1 M to about 4 M. For the catholyte solution, the magnetite powder formed by heating under an inert atmosphere is dissolved in the HCl(aq) to form an iron solution of about 1 M to about 4 M iron ions. The amount of the iron (II) chloride in the solution may then be adjusted by a redox process, such as electrochemically reducing FeCl3 to FeCl2.


To prepare the catholyte for an Fe/Fe flow battery from the black powder, the magnetite is dissolved in the HCl(aq) or acid solution. In this embodiment, only one electrolyte is prepared, iron (II) chloride. The magnetite powder formed by heating under an inert atmosphere is dissolved in the HCl(aq) to form a solution of about 1 M to about 4 M in concentration of iron. The amount of the iron (II) chloride in the solution may then be adjusted by electrochemically reducing FeCl3 to FeCl2, such as during the operation of the flow battery.


An embodiment described herein provides a method for forming electrolyte solutions for a flow battery from black powder. The method includes heating the black powder under an inert atmosphere to form Fe3O4, dissolving the Fe3O4 in an acid solution to form an electrolyte solution, and adjusting a ratio of iron (II) to iron (III) by a redox process.


In an aspect, the method includes analyzing the black powder for naturally occurring radioactive materials. In an aspect, the method includes discarding black powder including naturally occurring radioactive materials.


In an aspect, the method includes heating the black powder to a temperature of between about 400° C. and about 700° C. In an aspect, the method includes heating the black powder to a temperature of about 400° C.


In an aspect, the method includes mixing the acid solution to a concentration of about 1 molar to about 6 molar. In an aspect, the method includes mixing an HCl solution to a concentration of about 1 molar to about 6 molar to form the acid solution. In an aspect, the method includes dissolving the Fe3O4 in an acid solution comprising an HCl solution to form the electrolyte solution of a concentration of about 1 molar to about 4 molar iron ions.


In an aspect, the method includes adjusting the ratio of iron (II) to iron (III) by reducing iron (III) to iron (II) in an electrochemical cell. In an aspect, the method includes adjusting the ratio of iron (III) to iron (II) in the flow battery during a recharging process.


In an aspect, the method includes dissolving a vanadium compound in a second acid solution to form an anolyte. In an aspect, the method includes dissolving VCl3, VOSO4, or both in the second acid solution solution form a solution of about 1 M to about 4 M in concentration of vanadium.


Another embodiment described herein provides an electrolyte for a flow battery, including a solution of iron ions formed from black powder that has been heat-treated to be converted to magnetite and dissolved in an acidic solution.


In an aspect, the electrolyte includes an HCl solution of about 1 molar to about 6 molar in concentration. In an aspect, the electrolyte includes a solution of iron (II) and iron (III) ions in a concentration of about 1 molar to about 4 molar in iron. In an aspect, the electrolyte includes a solution of iron (II) ions formed from iron (III) ions in an electrochemical cell.


Another embodiment described herein provides a flow battery including a catholyte including iron ions formed from black powder that has been heat-treated to be converted to Fe3O4 and then dissolved in an acidic solution.


In an aspect, the catholyte includes an acidic solution of iron (III) ions and iron (II) ions. In an aspect, the flow battery includes a solid iron anode. In an aspect, the flow battery includes an anolyte including an acidic solution of iron (II) ions.


Other implementations are also within the scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for forming electrolyte solutions for a flow battery from black powder, wherein the black powder comprises Fe3O4, Fe2O3, or FeOOH, or any combination thereof, the method comprising: heating the black powder under an inert atmosphere to form Fe3O4;dissolving the Fe3O4 in an acid solution to form an electrolyte solution; andadjusting a ratio of iron (II) to iron (III) by a redox process.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, comprising analyzing the black powder for naturally occurring radioactive materials.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, comprising discarding black powder comprising naturally occurring radioactive materials.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, comprising heating the black powder to a temperature of between about 400° C. and about 700° C.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, comprising heating the black powder to a temperature of about 400° C.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, comprising mixing the acid solution to a concentration of about 1 molar to about 6 molar.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, comprising mixing an HCl solution to a concentration of about 1 molar to about 6 molar to form the acid solution.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, comprising dissolving the Fe3O4 in an acid solution comprising an HCl solution to form the electrolyte solution of a concentration of about 1 molar to about 4 molar iron ions.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, comprising adjusting the ratio of iron (II) to iron (III) by reducing iron (III) to iron (II) in an electrochemical cell.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, comprising adjusting the ratio of iron (III) to iron (II) in the flow battery during a recharging process.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, comprising dissolving a vanadium compound in an acid to form an anolyte.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, comprising dissolving VCl3, VOSO4, or both in an HCl solution form a solution of about 1 M to about 4 M in concentration of vanadium.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
20200100343 Jun 2020 GR national
US Referenced Citations (157)
Number Name Date Kind
106836 Kuhlmann Aug 1870 A
665346 Reed Jan 1901 A
701987 Alz Jun 1902 A
978576 Goodell Dec 1910 A
2378905 Bates Jun 1945 A
2614066 Cornell Oct 1952 A
2910426 Gluesenkamp Oct 1959 A
3288692 Leduc Nov 1966 A
3409540 Gould et al. Nov 1968 A
3427235 Leduc Feb 1969 A
3527834 Kehl et al. Sep 1970 A
3533938 Arnold Oct 1970 A
3585217 Titzenthaler Jun 1971 A
3632497 Leduc Jan 1972 A
3702292 Burich Nov 1972 A
3726789 Kovach Apr 1973 A
3755143 Hosoi et al. Aug 1973 A
3856659 Owen Dec 1974 A
3894059 Selvaratnam Jul 1975 A
4064062 Yurko Dec 1977 A
4090949 Owen et al. May 1978 A
4119507 Simmrock et al. Oct 1978 A
4134824 Kamm et al. Jan 1979 A
4230551 Salyer et al. Oct 1980 A
4264435 Read et al. Apr 1981 A
4297203 Ford et al. Oct 1981 A
4310501 Reh et al. Jan 1982 A
4332663 Bemeke Jun 1982 A
4426276 Dean et al. Jan 1984 A
4434031 Horowitz et al. Feb 1984 A
4522802 Setzer et al. Jun 1985 A
4527003 Okamoto et al. Jul 1985 A
4560451 Nielsen Dec 1985 A
4587011 Okamoto et al. May 1986 A
4602986 Ellis et al. Jul 1986 A
4655904 Okamoto et al. Apr 1987 A
4725349 Okamoto et al. Feb 1988 A
4735728 Wemhoff Apr 1988 A
4761394 Lauritzen Aug 1988 A
4786400 Farnsworth Nov 1988 A
4830728 Herbat et al. May 1989 A
4992160 Long et al. Feb 1991 A
5012360 Yamauchi et al. Apr 1991 A
5091351 Murakawa et al. Feb 1992 A
5108581 Aldridge Apr 1992 A
5527436 Cooker et al. Jun 1996 A
5601937 Isenberg Feb 1997 A
5624493 Wagh et al. Apr 1997 A
5904837 Fujiyama May 1999 A
5906728 Iaccino et al. May 1999 A
5951850 Ino et al. Sep 1999 A
6033555 Chen et al. Mar 2000 A
6190533 Bradow et al. Feb 2001 B1
6210562 Xie et al. Apr 2001 B1
6280593 Wiese et al. Aug 2001 B1
6293979 Choudhary et al. Sep 2001 B1
6312658 Hufton et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319864 Hannigan et al. Nov 2001 B1
6336791 O'Toole Jan 2002 B1
6531515 Moore, Jr. et al. Mar 2003 B2
6656346 Ino et al. Dec 2003 B2
6743961 Powers Jun 2004 B2
6849356 Dow et al. Feb 2005 B2
6979757 Powers Dec 2005 B2
7019187 Powers Mar 2006 B2
7045554 Raje et al. May 2006 B2
7132042 Genetti et al. Nov 2006 B2
7302795 Vetrovec Dec 2007 B2
7374664 Powers May 2008 B2
7378561 Olah et al. May 2008 B2
7396449 Powers Jul 2008 B2
7404889 Powers Jul 2008 B1
7419584 Stell et al. Sep 2008 B2
7460333 Akamatsu et al. Dec 2008 B2
7550642 Powers Jun 2009 B2
7592290 Hussain et al. Sep 2009 B2
7642292 Severinsky Jan 2010 B2
7744747 Halsey Jun 2010 B2
7858834 Powers Dec 2010 B2
7906559 Ohlah et al. Mar 2011 B2
7972498 Buchanan et al. Jul 2011 B2
7973087 Kibby et al. Jul 2011 B2
8152973 Yamamoto et al. Apr 2012 B2
8198338 Shulenberger et al. Jun 2012 B2
8287716 Al-Sadah Oct 2012 B2
8303917 Miyashiro et al. Nov 2012 B2
8304567 Kadota et al. Nov 2012 B2
8628668 Simonson Jan 2014 B2
8816137 Ohlah et al. Aug 2014 B2
8845940 Niven et al. Sep 2014 B2
8951333 Cabourdin et al. Feb 2015 B2
9085497 Jennings Jul 2015 B2
9090543 Schoedel et al. Jul 2015 B2
9096806 Abba et al. Aug 2015 B2
9175409 Sivasankar et al. Nov 2015 B2
9221027 Kuppler et al. Dec 2015 B2
9242230 Moon et al. Jan 2016 B2
9255230 Shafi et al. Feb 2016 B2
9260366 Verhaak et al. Feb 2016 B2
9279088 Shafi et al. Mar 2016 B2
9284497 Bourane et al. Mar 2016 B2
9284502 Bourane et al. Mar 2016 B2
9296961 Shafi et al. Mar 2016 B2
9303323 DiMascio et al. Apr 2016 B2
9312454 Itoh et al. Apr 2016 B2
9328035 Kuhn et al. May 2016 B1
9435404 Goleski et al. Sep 2016 B2
9555367 Masel et al. Jan 2017 B2
9559375 Savinell Jan 2017 B2
9618264 Berdut-Teruel Apr 2017 B1
9634343 Munier et al. Apr 2017 B2
9675979 Hassell Jun 2017 B2
9752080 Christensen et al. Sep 2017 B2
9884313 Shen et al. Feb 2018 B2
9963392 Deo et al. May 2018 B2
9970804 Khousa et al. May 2018 B2
9973141 Hammad et al. May 2018 B2
10179733 Becker et al. Jan 2019 B2
10252243 Fadhel et al. Apr 2019 B2
10252909 Lofberg et al. Apr 2019 B2
10329676 Kaczur et al. Jun 2019 B2
10357759 D'Souza et al. Jul 2019 B2
10422754 Al Hosani et al. Sep 2019 B2
20050211603 Guillaume et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060171065 Akamatsu et al. Aug 2006 A1
20080011644 Dean Jan 2008 A1
20080011645 Dean Jan 2008 A1
20080083648 Bishop et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080194900 Bhirud Aug 2008 A1
20080277314 Halsey Nov 2008 A1
20080283445 Powers Nov 2008 A1
20090050523 Halsey Feb 2009 A1
20100089795 Fujiyama et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100137458 Erling Jun 2010 A1
20100261070 Keshavarz Oct 2010 A1
20110083996 Shafi et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110132770 Sala et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110247500 Akhras et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120077068 Wang Mar 2012 A1
20120156497 Boiko Jun 2012 A1
20130062286 Ruiz Hitzky Mar 2013 A1
20130129610 Kale May 2013 A1
20130220884 Bourane et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130233766 Shafi et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130248419 Abba Sep 2013 A1
20150048777 Goldstein Feb 2015 A1
20150225295 Mcandlish et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150337445 Hasegawa et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150343416 Fadhel Dec 2015 A1
20160002035 Ralston et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160264886 Davydov Sep 2016 A1
20160333487 Rodriguez Nov 2016 A1
20170050845 Lofberg et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170292197 Lei et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170320751 Amiran Nov 2017 A1
20190011372 Cunningham et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190194074 Amr et al. Jun 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
2938299 May 2015 CA
104923234 Dec 2017 CN
WO 2000009633 Feb 2000 WO
WO 2009073436 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2010009077 Jan 2010 WO
WO 2010009082 Jan 2010 WO
WO 2010009089 Jan 2010 WO
WO 2010143783 Dec 2010 WO
WO 2015128045 Sep 2013 WO
WO 2014160168 Oct 2014 WO
WO 2015183200 Dec 2015 WO
WO 2016207892 Dec 2016 WO
WO 2019112555 Jun 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (39)
Entry
Naik et al. “Carbon Dioxide sequestration in cementitious products,” Report No. CNU-2009-02, REP-640, Collegef Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Jan. 2009 53 pages.
Albrecht et al., “Unexpectedly efficient CO2 hydrogenation to higher hydrocarbons over non-doped Fe2O3,” Appl, Catal., B, May 2017, 204: 119-126.
Bhuiyan, “Metathesis of Butene to Produce Propylene over Mesoporous Tungsten Oxide Catalyst: Synthesis, Characterization and Kinetic Modeling,” Master thesis, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Jun. 2013, 188 pages.
Chew et al., “Effect of nitrogen doping on the reducibility, activity and selectivity of carbon nanotube-supported iron catalysts applied in CO2 hydrogenation,” Appl. Catal., A, Jul. 2014, 482: 163-170.
Choi et al., “Carbon dioxide Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: A new path to carbon-neutral fuels,” Appl, Catal., B, Mar. 2017, 202: 605-610.
Choi et al., “Hydrogenation of carbon dioxide over alumina supported Fe-K catalysts,” Catalysis Letters, Mar. 1996, 40: 115-118.
Crammer et al., “The Mechanism of Isomerization of Olefins with transition metal catalysts,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Mar. 1966, 88(15): 3534-3544.
Ding et al., “CO2 Hydrogenation to Hydrocarbons over Iron-Based Catalyst: Effects of Physico-Chemical Properties of Al2O3 Supports,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 53(45): 17563-17569.
Gräfe et al., “Bauxite residue issues: IV. Old obstacles and new pathways for in situ residue bioremediation,” Hydrometallurgy, 2011, 108: 46-59.
Hu et al., “Hydrothermally stable MOFs for CO2 hydrogenation over iron-based catalyst to light olefins,” J. CO2 Util., 2016, 15, 89-95.
Hua et al., “Transformation of 2-Butene into Propene on WO3/MCM-48: Metathesis and Isomerization of n-Butene,” Catalysts, 2018, 8, 11 pages.
Lee et al., “Selective Positional Isomerization of 2-Butene over Alumina and La-promoted Alumina Catalysts,” J. Ind. Eng. Chem., Dec. 2007, 13(7): 1062-1066.
Liu et al.“Fe-MOF-derived highly active catalysts for carbon dioxide hydrogenation to valuable hydrocarbons,” J. CO2 Util., Oct. 2017, 21:100-107.
Liu et al., “Pyrolyzing ZIF-8 to N-doped porous carbon facilitated by iron and potassium for CO2 hydrogenation to value-added hydrocarbons,” J. CO2 Util., May 2018, 25: 120-127.
Madadkhani, “Red mud as an Ironbased Catalyst for Catalytic Cracking of Naphthalene,” Master's thesis, The University of British Columbia, 2014; Shiva Makadani, The University of British Columbia, Dec. 2016, 192 pages.
Morrison, “Cis-trans Isomerization of Olefins by Intramolecular Energy Transfer,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Feb. 1965, 87(4): 932.
Nam et al., “Catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbons over iron supported on alkali ion-exchanged Y-zeolite catalysts,” Appl. Catal., A, Apr. 1999, 179(1-2): 155-163.
Nam et al., “Catalytic Conversion of Carbon dioxide into hyrdrocarbons over zinc promoted iron catalysts,” Energy onvers. Manage., 1997, 38: S397-S402.
Ndlela et al., “Reducibility of Potassium-Promoted Iron Oxide under Hydrogen Conditions,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2003, 42: 2112-2121.
Numpilai et al., “Pore size effects on physicochemical properties of Fe-Co/K-Al2O3 catalysts and their catalytic activity in CO2 hydrogenation to light olefins,” Appl. Surf. Sci., Jul. 2019, 483, 581-592.
Pavlov et al., “Processes of Synthesis of 1-Butene from 2-Butene by the Positional Isomerization on Suffocation Exchangers,” Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry, Jul. 2009, 82(6): 1117-1122.
Ramirez et al., “Metal Organic Framework-Derived Iron Catalysts for the Direct Hydrogenation of CO2 to Short Chain Olefins,” ACS Catal., 2018, 8:9174-9182.
Russkikh et al., “Red mud as an efficient catalyst in turning CO2 hydrogenation,” Chemical Science Seminar, Oct. 13, 2019; KAUST, 2019, 1 page, Abstract only.
Thach et al., “Further Improvements in Isomerization of Olefins in Solvent-free conditions,” Journal of Synthetic Communications, Nov. 1992, pp. 1379-1384, Abstract only.
Visconti et al., “CO2 Hydrogentation to Lower Olefins on a High Surface Area K-Promoted Bulk FE-Catalyst,” Appl. Catal., B 2017, 200, 530-542, 44 pages.
Wahyudi et al., “Utilization of Modified Red Mud as a Heterogeneous Base Catalyst for A26Transesterification of Canola Oil,” Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 2017, 50(7): 561-567.
Wang et al., “Fe-Cu Bimetallic Catalysts for Selective CO2 Hydrogenation to Olefin-rich C2+ Hydrocarbons,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Feb. 2018, 57(13): 4535-4542.
Wei et al., “New insights into the effect of sodium on Fe3O4-based nanocatalysts for CO2 hydrogenation to light olefins,” Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6(13): 4786-4793.
You et al., “Hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to light olefins over non-supported iron catalyst,” Chin. J. Catal., May 2013, 34(5): 956-963.
“Hydrogen and Oxygen production via electrolysis powered by renewable energies to reduc environmental footprint of a WWTP,,” Greenlysis, www.life-greenlysis.eu 2010-2012, 16 pages.
Du et al., “Sodium Hydroxide Production from Seawater Desalination Brine: Process Design and Energy Efficency,” Environ.Sci. Technol. 52, 5949-5958, 2018, 10 pages.
Dinesh et al., “Iron-based flow batteries to store renewable energies,” Environmental Chemistry Letters, Feb. 2018, 12 pages.
Yensen et al., “Open source all-iron battery for renewable energy storage,” HardwareX 6 (2019) e00072, 2019, 11 pages.
Cowie et al., “Naturally occurring radioactive material and naturally occurring mercury assessment of black powder in sales gas pipelines,” Radiation Protection and Environment, vol. 42, Issue 1 & 2, Jan.-Mar. & Apr.-Jun. 2019, 6 pages.
Godoy et al., “210Pb content in natural gas pipeline residues (”black-powder“) and its correlation with the chemical composition,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 83 (2005) 101e111, 12 pages.
pall.com (online), “Cyclo-Filter System,” retrieved from URL <https://www.pall.com/en/oil-gas/midstream/midstream-black-powder.html>, retrieved on Jun. 16, 2020, available on or before 2020, 4 pages.
shop.pall.com (online), “Black Powder Filter,” retrieved from URL <https://shop.pall.com/us/en/search?SearchTerm=black+powder+filter&resetsearch=true>, retrieved on Jun. 16, 2020, available on or before 2020, 7 pages.
Van Beurden, “On the Catalytic Aspects of Stream-Methane Reforming: A Literature Survey,” ECN-I—04-003, retrieved from URL <https://publicaties.ecn.nl/PdfFetch.aspx?nr=ECN-I—04-003>, Dec. 2004, 27 pages.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2021/036600, dated Sep. 24, 2021, 14 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210399323 A1 Dec 2021 US