This disclosure relates to producing electrolytes for flow batteries.
Energy storage is currently one of the major challenges in the deployment of renewable energy resources and the improvement of the electrical grid efficiency. Flow batteries are among the most promising storage options and have the potential to be cheaper and more flexible than other competitors. A flow battery is an energy storage technology that stores electrical energy as chemical energy in flowing solutions. converts and and release it in a controlled manner when required. It is worth noting that the design of a flow battery allows for the separation between power and energy capacity that keeps the cost low for large scale application and also, facilitates matching with various loads/applications.
An embodiment described herein provides a method for forming electrolyte solutions for a flow battery from black powder. The method includes heating the black powder under an inert atmosphere to form Fe3O4, dissolving the Fe3O4 in an acid solution to form an electrolyte solution, and adjusting a ratio of iron (II) to iron (III) by a redox process.
Another embodiment described herein provides an electrolyte for a flow battery, including a solution of iron ions formed from black powder that has been heat-treated to be converted to Fe3O4, and dissolved in an acidic solution.
Another embodiment described herein provides a flow battery including a catholyte including iron ions formed from black powder that has been heat-treated to be converted to Fe3O4 and then dissolved in an acidic solution.
The electrolyte represents about 30% to about 40% of the total cost of a flow battery. As electrolytes have generally been very costly, this has limited the wide spread deployment of flow batteries. Accordingly, lower cost electrolyte materials would allow for greater adoption of flow cells. Cost reduction can be achieved by utilizing low value materials as the main raw materials for electrolyte synthesis. Waste materials, such as black powder from pipelines, are present in large quantities and are underutilized.
The techniques described herein provide for the formation of iron-containing electrolytes for flow batteries using black powder has the primary raw material. As the black powder is an abundant waste material, the costs of the electrolyte are substantially reduced.
As used herein, black powder is a solid contaminant often found in hydrocarbon pipelines. The material may be wet, for example, having a tar-like appearance. The black powder be a very fine, dry powder. Black powder can include mill scale, such as magnetite or Fe3O4, which originates from the pipe manufacturing process as steel is oxidized at high temperatures. These types of solids strongly adhere to pipe walls and are not easily removed. Further, black powder can include flash rust, such as Fe2O3 and FeOOH, from water exposure during hydrotesting. Black powder can also be formed by internal pipeline corrosion, such as caused by microbial action, acid gas corrosion, or both. Black powder can also be a carryover from gas gathering systems.
Black powder is regarded as a chronic nuisance waste that is removed from valuable process streams by the use of filter bags, separators, or cyclones, among others. Limited efforts have been exerted to utilize black powder, despite its availability in large amounts at almost no cost.
In some embodiments described herein, the black powder is tested for contamination by naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM). NORM may include decay products formed from uranium and thorium in subsurface deposits. For example, lead-210 may be present in some black powders. However, as the materials generally decay quickly and lead-210 is a long-lived isotope, most black powder deposits are relatively free of NORM. This allows the use of black powder for other applications. However, if the black powder includes lead-210, or other norm, the black powder may be discarded.
Accordingly, the black powder can be used as the main raw material to synthesize iron based electrolyte solutions. The electrolyte solutions may be used in Fe/V, Fe/Fe and/or Fe/V mixed chloride and sulfide flow batteries, as well as in electrolytes used in fixed installation (non-flow type) batteries.
In some embodiments, an ion exchange membrane 114 is used in the electrochemical cell 110. The ion exchange membrane 114 separates the electrolytes 102 and 104 to prevent energy loss by short-circuiting, while allowing protons, or other ions, to pass between the sides during charge and discharge cycles. In some embodiments, the ion exchange membrane 114 is a sulfonated tetrafluoroethylene, commercially available as NAFION® from DuPont Chemical of Wilmington Va. The ion exchange membrane 114 generally controls the efficiency of the flow battery 100, and is a significant contributor to the cost of the flow battery 100. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the ion exchange membrane 114 is omitted and the electrolytes 102 and 104 are generally kept from mixing by laminar flow or is made unnecessary by battery design, such as if a single electrolyte solution is used.
As the electrolytes 102 and 104 are pumped through the electrochemical cell 110, they pass through channels 116 and 118. The channels 116 and 118 may include a porous electrode material, such as felt, or Rainey nickel, among others, to allow ions and electrons to flow between the electrolytes 102 and 104. In some embodiments, for example, when the ion exchange membrane 114 is omitted, the channels 116 and 118 may be narrow to enhance laminar flow.
During the production of power, the anolyte 102 is oxidized, losing electrons to the anode current collector 120. The electrons are transferred by a line 122 to a load 124. After powering the load 124, the electrons are returned to the electrochemical cell 110 by another line 126. The electrons reenter the electrochemical cell 110 from the cathode current collector 128, reducing the catholyte 104.
The anolyte 102 and catholyte 104 are regenerated during a charging cycle when a power source 130 removes electrons from the cathode current collector 128 through a line 132, oxidizing the catholyte 104 to its initial state. The electrons are provided to the anode current collector 120 from the power source 130 through another line 134, reducing the anolyte 102 to its initial state.
One of the most established technologies for flow batteries is based on vanadium redox chemistry and is termed the vanadium redox flow battery (VRB). In VRBs, vanadium ions are dissolved in an aqueous acid supporting electrolyte. VRBs are often based on V2+/V3+ and V4+/V5+ redox couples. However, VRBs have high costs for the vanadium-based electrolytes and for the Nafion membranes, providing incentives for lower cost materials.
Accordingly, a flow battery based on Fe/V redox chemistry has been explored as a potential option for lowering costs for large scale energy storage, as iron is lower cost than vanadium. In an Fe/V flow battery, during the discharge cycle of the flow battery, the catholyte 104 includes Fe(III) which is reduced to Fe(II) at the cathode current collector 128 (+), while the anolyte 102 includes V(II) which is oxidized to V(III) at the anode current collector 120 (−), according to the reactions shown below:
Fe3++e−→Fe2+ (1)
V2+→V3++e− (2)
Fe3++V2+→V3++Fe2+ (3)
In some embodiments, the Fe/Fe flow battery does not use an iron anode 202, but uses two electrolyte solutions, an anolyte that includes FeCl2 and a catholyte that includes FeCl3 and FeCl2. In these embodiments, an ion exchange membrane 114 is used in the configuration shown in
Preparation of Black Powder for Use in an Electrolyte
At block 302, the black powder is heated under an inert atmosphere to form magnetite (Fe3O4), as described with respect to
Preparation of Anolyte and Catholyte Solutions
After the heat treatment to form the magnetite (Fe3O4), the electrolytes can be prepared at room temperature using deionized (DI) water. This may be performed by preparing a solution of HCl, or a mixture of acids, at a concentration of about 1 to about 6 molar (M) in the DI water.
To prepare the electrolytes for an Fe/V flow battery from the black powder, the appropriate metal sources are dissolved in the HCl(aq) or acid solution. For the anolyte, VCl3, VOSO4, or both is dissolved in HCl(aq) form a solution of vanadium with a concentration of about 1 M to about 4 M. For the catholyte solution, the magnetite powder formed by heating under an inert atmosphere is dissolved in the HCl(aq) to form an iron solution of about 1 M to about 4 M iron ions. The amount of the iron (II) chloride in the solution may then be adjusted by a redox process, such as electrochemically reducing FeCl3 to FeCl2.
To prepare the catholyte for an Fe/Fe flow battery from the black powder, the magnetite is dissolved in the HCl(aq) or acid solution. In this embodiment, only one electrolyte is prepared, iron (II) chloride. The magnetite powder formed by heating under an inert atmosphere is dissolved in the HCl(aq) to form a solution of about 1 M to about 4 M in concentration of iron. The amount of the iron (II) chloride in the solution may then be adjusted by electrochemically reducing FeCl3 to FeCl2, such as during the operation of the flow battery.
An embodiment described herein provides a method for forming electrolyte solutions for a flow battery from black powder. The method includes heating the black powder under an inert atmosphere to form Fe3O4, dissolving the Fe3O4 in an acid solution to form an electrolyte solution, and adjusting a ratio of iron (II) to iron (III) by a redox process.
In an aspect, the method includes analyzing the black powder for naturally occurring radioactive materials. In an aspect, the method includes discarding black powder including naturally occurring radioactive materials.
In an aspect, the method includes heating the black powder to a temperature of between about 400° C. and about 700° C. In an aspect, the method includes heating the black powder to a temperature of about 400° C.
In an aspect, the method includes mixing the acid solution to a concentration of about 1 molar to about 6 molar. In an aspect, the method includes mixing an HCl solution to a concentration of about 1 molar to about 6 molar to form the acid solution. In an aspect, the method includes dissolving the Fe3O4 in an acid solution comprising an HCl solution to form the electrolyte solution of a concentration of about 1 molar to about 4 molar iron ions.
In an aspect, the method includes adjusting the ratio of iron (II) to iron (III) by reducing iron (III) to iron (II) in an electrochemical cell. In an aspect, the method includes adjusting the ratio of iron (III) to iron (II) in the flow battery during a recharging process.
In an aspect, the method includes dissolving a vanadium compound in a second acid solution to form an anolyte. In an aspect, the method includes dissolving VCl3, VOSO4, or both in the second acid solution solution form a solution of about 1 M to about 4 M in concentration of vanadium.
Another embodiment described herein provides an electrolyte for a flow battery, including a solution of iron ions formed from black powder that has been heat-treated to be converted to magnetite and dissolved in an acidic solution.
In an aspect, the electrolyte includes an HCl solution of about 1 molar to about 6 molar in concentration. In an aspect, the electrolyte includes a solution of iron (II) and iron (III) ions in a concentration of about 1 molar to about 4 molar in iron. In an aspect, the electrolyte includes a solution of iron (II) ions formed from iron (III) ions in an electrochemical cell.
Another embodiment described herein provides a flow battery including a catholyte including iron ions formed from black powder that has been heat-treated to be converted to Fe3O4 and then dissolved in an acidic solution.
In an aspect, the catholyte includes an acidic solution of iron (III) ions and iron (II) ions. In an aspect, the flow battery includes a solid iron anode. In an aspect, the flow battery includes an anolyte including an acidic solution of iron (II) ions.
Other implementations are also within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20200100343 | Jun 2020 | GR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
106836 | Kuhlmann | Aug 1870 | A |
665346 | Reed | Jan 1901 | A |
701987 | Alz | Jun 1902 | A |
978576 | Goodell | Dec 1910 | A |
2378905 | Bates | Jun 1945 | A |
2614066 | Cornell | Oct 1952 | A |
2910426 | Gluesenkamp | Oct 1959 | A |
3288692 | Leduc | Nov 1966 | A |
3409540 | Gould et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3427235 | Leduc | Feb 1969 | A |
3527834 | Kehl et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3533938 | Arnold | Oct 1970 | A |
3585217 | Titzenthaler | Jun 1971 | A |
3632497 | Leduc | Jan 1972 | A |
3702292 | Burich | Nov 1972 | A |
3726789 | Kovach | Apr 1973 | A |
3755143 | Hosoi et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3856659 | Owen | Dec 1974 | A |
3894059 | Selvaratnam | Jul 1975 | A |
4064062 | Yurko | Dec 1977 | A |
4090949 | Owen et al. | May 1978 | A |
4119507 | Simmrock et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4134824 | Kamm et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4230551 | Salyer et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4264435 | Read et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4297203 | Ford et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4310501 | Reh et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4332663 | Bemeke | Jun 1982 | A |
4426276 | Dean et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4434031 | Horowitz et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4522802 | Setzer et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4527003 | Okamoto et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4560451 | Nielsen | Dec 1985 | A |
4587011 | Okamoto et al. | May 1986 | A |
4602986 | Ellis et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4655904 | Okamoto et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4725349 | Okamoto et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4735728 | Wemhoff | Apr 1988 | A |
4761394 | Lauritzen | Aug 1988 | A |
4786400 | Farnsworth | Nov 1988 | A |
4830728 | Herbat et al. | May 1989 | A |
4992160 | Long et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5012360 | Yamauchi et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5091351 | Murakawa et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5108581 | Aldridge | Apr 1992 | A |
5527436 | Cooker et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5601937 | Isenberg | Feb 1997 | A |
5624493 | Wagh et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5904837 | Fujiyama | May 1999 | A |
5906728 | Iaccino et al. | May 1999 | A |
5951850 | Ino et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6033555 | Chen et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6190533 | Bradow et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210562 | Xie et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6280593 | Wiese et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293979 | Choudhary et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312658 | Hufton et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319864 | Hannigan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336791 | O'Toole | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6531515 | Moore, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6656346 | Ino et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6743961 | Powers | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6849356 | Dow et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6979757 | Powers | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7019187 | Powers | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7045554 | Raje et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7132042 | Genetti et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7302795 | Vetrovec | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7374664 | Powers | May 2008 | B2 |
7378561 | Olah et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7396449 | Powers | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404889 | Powers | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7419584 | Stell et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7460333 | Akamatsu et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7550642 | Powers | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7592290 | Hussain et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7642292 | Severinsky | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7744747 | Halsey | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7858834 | Powers | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7906559 | Ohlah et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7972498 | Buchanan et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7973087 | Kibby et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8152973 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8198338 | Shulenberger et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8287716 | Al-Sadah | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8303917 | Miyashiro et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8304567 | Kadota et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8628668 | Simonson | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8816137 | Ohlah et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8845940 | Niven et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8951333 | Cabourdin et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9085497 | Jennings | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9090543 | Schoedel et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9096806 | Abba et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9175409 | Sivasankar et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9221027 | Kuppler et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9242230 | Moon et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9255230 | Shafi et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9260366 | Verhaak et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9279088 | Shafi et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9284497 | Bourane et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9284502 | Bourane et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9296961 | Shafi et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9303323 | DiMascio et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9312454 | Itoh et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9328035 | Kuhn et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9435404 | Goleski et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9555367 | Masel et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9559375 | Savinell | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9618264 | Berdut-Teruel | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9634343 | Munier et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9675979 | Hassell | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9752080 | Christensen et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9884313 | Shen et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9963392 | Deo et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9970804 | Khousa et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9973141 | Hammad et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10179733 | Becker et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10252243 | Fadhel et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10252909 | Lofberg et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10329676 | Kaczur et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10357759 | D'Souza et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10422754 | Al Hosani et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
20050211603 | Guillaume et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060171065 | Akamatsu et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080011644 | Dean | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080011645 | Dean | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080083648 | Bishop et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080194900 | Bhirud | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080277314 | Halsey | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080283445 | Powers | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090050523 | Halsey | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100089795 | Fujiyama et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100137458 | Erling | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100261070 | Keshavarz | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110083996 | Shafi et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110132770 | Sala et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110247500 | Akhras et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120077068 | Wang | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120156497 | Boiko | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130062286 | Ruiz Hitzky | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130129610 | Kale | May 2013 | A1 |
20130220884 | Bourane et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130233766 | Shafi et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130248419 | Abba | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20150048777 | Goldstein | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150225295 | Mcandlish et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150337445 | Hasegawa et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150343416 | Fadhel | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160002035 | Ralston et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160264886 | Davydov | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160333487 | Rodriguez | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170050845 | Lofberg et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170292197 | Lei et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170320751 | Amiran | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20190011372 | Cunningham et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190194074 | Amr et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2938299 | May 2015 | CA |
104923234 | Dec 2017 | CN |
WO 2000009633 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 2009073436 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2010009077 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2010009082 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2010009089 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2010143783 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2015128045 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 2014160168 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO 2015183200 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 2016207892 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO 2019112555 | Jun 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Naik et al. “Carbon Dioxide sequestration in cementitious products,” Report No. CNU-2009-02, REP-640, Collegef Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Jan. 2009 53 pages. |
Albrecht et al., “Unexpectedly efficient CO2 hydrogenation to higher hydrocarbons over non-doped Fe2O3,” Appl, Catal., B, May 2017, 204: 119-126. |
Bhuiyan, “Metathesis of Butene to Produce Propylene over Mesoporous Tungsten Oxide Catalyst: Synthesis, Characterization and Kinetic Modeling,” Master thesis, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Jun. 2013, 188 pages. |
Chew et al., “Effect of nitrogen doping on the reducibility, activity and selectivity of carbon nanotube-supported iron catalysts applied in CO2 hydrogenation,” Appl. Catal., A, Jul. 2014, 482: 163-170. |
Choi et al., “Carbon dioxide Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: A new path to carbon-neutral fuels,” Appl, Catal., B, Mar. 2017, 202: 605-610. |
Choi et al., “Hydrogenation of carbon dioxide over alumina supported Fe-K catalysts,” Catalysis Letters, Mar. 1996, 40: 115-118. |
Crammer et al., “The Mechanism of Isomerization of Olefins with transition metal catalysts,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Mar. 1966, 88(15): 3534-3544. |
Ding et al., “CO2 Hydrogenation to Hydrocarbons over Iron-Based Catalyst: Effects of Physico-Chemical Properties of Al2O3 Supports,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 53(45): 17563-17569. |
Gräfe et al., “Bauxite residue issues: IV. Old obstacles and new pathways for in situ residue bioremediation,” Hydrometallurgy, 2011, 108: 46-59. |
Hu et al., “Hydrothermally stable MOFs for CO2 hydrogenation over iron-based catalyst to light olefins,” J. CO2 Util., 2016, 15, 89-95. |
Hua et al., “Transformation of 2-Butene into Propene on WO3/MCM-48: Metathesis and Isomerization of n-Butene,” Catalysts, 2018, 8, 11 pages. |
Lee et al., “Selective Positional Isomerization of 2-Butene over Alumina and La-promoted Alumina Catalysts,” J. Ind. Eng. Chem., Dec. 2007, 13(7): 1062-1066. |
Liu et al.“Fe-MOF-derived highly active catalysts for carbon dioxide hydrogenation to valuable hydrocarbons,” J. CO2 Util., Oct. 2017, 21:100-107. |
Liu et al., “Pyrolyzing ZIF-8 to N-doped porous carbon facilitated by iron and potassium for CO2 hydrogenation to value-added hydrocarbons,” J. CO2 Util., May 2018, 25: 120-127. |
Madadkhani, “Red mud as an Ironbased Catalyst for Catalytic Cracking of Naphthalene,” Master's thesis, The University of British Columbia, 2014; Shiva Makadani, The University of British Columbia, Dec. 2016, 192 pages. |
Morrison, “Cis-trans Isomerization of Olefins by Intramolecular Energy Transfer,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Feb. 1965, 87(4): 932. |
Nam et al., “Catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbons over iron supported on alkali ion-exchanged Y-zeolite catalysts,” Appl. Catal., A, Apr. 1999, 179(1-2): 155-163. |
Nam et al., “Catalytic Conversion of Carbon dioxide into hyrdrocarbons over zinc promoted iron catalysts,” Energy onvers. Manage., 1997, 38: S397-S402. |
Ndlela et al., “Reducibility of Potassium-Promoted Iron Oxide under Hydrogen Conditions,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2003, 42: 2112-2121. |
Numpilai et al., “Pore size effects on physicochemical properties of Fe-Co/K-Al2O3 catalysts and their catalytic activity in CO2 hydrogenation to light olefins,” Appl. Surf. Sci., Jul. 2019, 483, 581-592. |
Pavlov et al., “Processes of Synthesis of 1-Butene from 2-Butene by the Positional Isomerization on Suffocation Exchangers,” Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry, Jul. 2009, 82(6): 1117-1122. |
Ramirez et al., “Metal Organic Framework-Derived Iron Catalysts for the Direct Hydrogenation of CO2 to Short Chain Olefins,” ACS Catal., 2018, 8:9174-9182. |
Russkikh et al., “Red mud as an efficient catalyst in turning CO2 hydrogenation,” Chemical Science Seminar, Oct. 13, 2019; KAUST, 2019, 1 page, Abstract only. |
Thach et al., “Further Improvements in Isomerization of Olefins in Solvent-free conditions,” Journal of Synthetic Communications, Nov. 1992, pp. 1379-1384, Abstract only. |
Visconti et al., “CO2 Hydrogentation to Lower Olefins on a High Surface Area K-Promoted Bulk FE-Catalyst,” Appl. Catal., B 2017, 200, 530-542, 44 pages. |
Wahyudi et al., “Utilization of Modified Red Mud as a Heterogeneous Base Catalyst for A26Transesterification of Canola Oil,” Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 2017, 50(7): 561-567. |
Wang et al., “Fe-Cu Bimetallic Catalysts for Selective CO2 Hydrogenation to Olefin-rich C2+ Hydrocarbons,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Feb. 2018, 57(13): 4535-4542. |
Wei et al., “New insights into the effect of sodium on Fe3O4-based nanocatalysts for CO2 hydrogenation to light olefins,” Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6(13): 4786-4793. |
You et al., “Hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to light olefins over non-supported iron catalyst,” Chin. J. Catal., May 2013, 34(5): 956-963. |
“Hydrogen and Oxygen production via electrolysis powered by renewable energies to reduc environmental footprint of a WWTP,,” Greenlysis, www.life-greenlysis.eu 2010-2012, 16 pages. |
Du et al., “Sodium Hydroxide Production from Seawater Desalination Brine: Process Design and Energy Efficency,” Environ.Sci. Technol. 52, 5949-5958, 2018, 10 pages. |
Dinesh et al., “Iron-based flow batteries to store renewable energies,” Environmental Chemistry Letters, Feb. 2018, 12 pages. |
Yensen et al., “Open source all-iron battery for renewable energy storage,” HardwareX 6 (2019) e00072, 2019, 11 pages. |
Cowie et al., “Naturally occurring radioactive material and naturally occurring mercury assessment of black powder in sales gas pipelines,” Radiation Protection and Environment, vol. 42, Issue 1 & 2, Jan.-Mar. & Apr.-Jun. 2019, 6 pages. |
Godoy et al., “210Pb content in natural gas pipeline residues (”black-powder“) and its correlation with the chemical composition,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 83 (2005) 101e111, 12 pages. |
pall.com (online), “Cyclo-Filter System,” retrieved from URL <https://www.pall.com/en/oil-gas/midstream/midstream-black-powder.html>, retrieved on Jun. 16, 2020, available on or before 2020, 4 pages. |
shop.pall.com (online), “Black Powder Filter,” retrieved from URL <https://shop.pall.com/us/en/search?SearchTerm=black+powder+filter&resetsearch=true>, retrieved on Jun. 16, 2020, available on or before 2020, 7 pages. |
Van Beurden, “On the Catalytic Aspects of Stream-Methane Reforming: A Literature Survey,” ECN-I—04-003, retrieved from URL <https://publicaties.ecn.nl/PdfFetch.aspx?nr=ECN-I—04-003>, Dec. 2004, 27 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2021/036600, dated Sep. 24, 2021, 14 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210399323 A1 | Dec 2021 | US |