The present invention relates to antimicrobial compositions and methods for use of those compositions in various medical applications. One of the major challenges of modern medical treatment is the prevention of infection by microbial organisms.
One area where this challenge is constantly presented is in infusion therapy. Infusion therapy is one of the most common health care procedures. Hospitalized, home care, and other patients receive fluids, pharmaceuticals, and blood products via vascular access devices inserted into the vascular system. Infusion therapy may be used to treat an infection, provide anesthesia or analgesia, provide nutritional support, treat cancerous growths, and maintain blood pressure and heart rhythm, among many other clinically significant uses.
Infusion therapy is facilitated by a vascular access device. The vascular access device may access a patient's peripheral or central vasculature. The vascular access device may be indwelling for short term (days), moderate term (weeks), or long term (months to years). The vascular access device may be used for continuous infusion therapy or for intermittent therapy.
A common vascular access device is a plastic catheter that is inserted into a patient's vein. The catheter length may vary from a few centimeters for peripheral access to many centimeters for central access by devices such as central vascular catheters (CVC) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC). The catheter may be inserted transcutaneously or may be surgically implanted beneath the patient's skin. The catheter, or any other vascular access device attached thereto, may have a single lumen or multiple lumens for infusion of many fluids simultaneously.
The vascular access device commonly includes a Luer adapter to which other medical devices may be attached. For example, an administration set may be attached to a vascular access device at one end and an intravenous (IV) bag at the other. The administration set is then a fluid conduit for the continuous infusion of fluids and pharmaceuticals. Commonly, an IV access device is attached to another vascular access device that acts to close the vascular access device, thus allowing for the intermittent infusion or injection of fluids and pharmaceuticals. An IV access device may include a housing and septum for closing the system, the latter of which may be opened with a blunt cannula or male Luer of a medical device.
Accessing the vascular access device could lead to certain complications due to several factors, such as contamination. Complications associated with infusion therapy may cause significant morbidity and even mortality. One significant complication is catheter related blood stream infection (CRBSI). An estimated 250,000-400,000 cases of central venous catheter (CVC) associated blood stream infections (BSIs) occur annually in US hospitals. Attributable mortality is an estimated 12%-25% for each infection and costs the health care system $25,000-$56,000 per episode.
A vascular access device may serve as a nidus of infection, resulting in a disseminated BSI. This may be caused by failure to regularly flush the device, a non-sterile insertion technique, or by pathogens that enter the fluid flow path through either end of the path subsequent to catheter insertion. When a vascular access device is contaminated, pathogens adhere to the vascular access device, colonize, and form a biofilm. The biofilm is resistant to most biocidal agents and provides a replenishing source of pathogens to enter a patient's bloodstream and cause a BSI. Thus, devices with antimicrobial properties are needed.
One approach to preventing biofilm formation and patient infection is to provide an antimicrobial coating on various medical devices and components. Over the last 35 years, it has been common practice to use a thermoplastic polyurethane solution as the carrier for antimicrobial coatings. The solvent is usually tetrahydrofuran (THF), dimethylformamide (DMF), or a blend of both. Since THF can be oxidized very quickly and tends to be very explosive, an expensive explosion-proof coating facility is necessary. These harsh solvents also attack many of the polymeric materials commonly used, including polyurethane, silicone, polyisoprene, butyl rubber polycarbonate, rigid polyurethane, rigid polyvinyl chloride, acrylics, and styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR). Therefore, medical devices made with these materials can become distorted over time and/or form microcracks on their surfaces. Another issue with this type of coating is that it takes almost 24 hours for the solvent to be completely heat evaporated. Accordingly, conventional technology has persistent problems with processing, performance, and cost.
Another limitation is the availability of suitable antimicrobial agents for use in such coatings. One of the most commonly used antimicrobial agents used in coating medical devices is silver, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,933,178. Silver salts and elemental silver are well known antimicrobial agents in both the medical surgical industry and general consumer products industries. They are usually incorporated into the polymeric bulk material or coated onto the surface of the medical devices by plasma, heat evaporation, electroplating, or conventional solvent coating technologies. These technologies are tedious, expensive, and not environmentally friendly.
In addition, the performance of silver coated medical devices is mediocre at best. For example, it can take up to eight (8) hours before the silver ion, ionized from silver salts or elemental silver, to be efficacious as an antimicrobial agent. As a result, substantial microbial activity can occur prior to the silver coating even becoming effective. Furthermore, many antimicrobial coatings with a silver compound or elemental silver are opaque, thus preventing the visualization of the fluid path in a vascular access device. Such visualization could be important to practitioners as an indicator of the progress of IV therapy. Added processing steps and cost are needed to improve the transparency of silver based antimicrobial coatings, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,178,120.
In U.S. Pat. Appl. No. 20100135949, Ou Yang disclosed a UV curable antimicrobial coating that was much cheaper to process and possessed superior antimicrobial efficacy in comparison to silver based antimicrobial coatings technology. However, a rheology modifier was required of this composition to prevent phase separation of the insoluble antimicrobial agent from the rest of the coating composition. The use of the rheology modifier increases the coating viscosity substantially, thus prohibiting the use of spraying as a coating application method. Accordingly, a solvent must be added to the coating composition to achieve a workable, sprayable viscosity, as described in U.S. Pat. Appl. No. 20100137472. The use of a solvent may be undesirable, as indicated above. Further, the addition of a solvent to lower the viscosity of the coating composition will result in increased phase separation of the antimicrobial agent within the coating composition.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for improved compositions that impart antimicrobial capability to medical devices of various types, particularly devices related to infusion therapy. Specifically, there is a need for an effective antimicrobial coating that can be easily applied to medical devices constructed of polymeric materials and metals. There is also a need for improved methods of applying such antimicrobial coatings to medical devices. Further, there is a need for an effective antimicrobial coating comprising insoluble antimicrobial agents that are evenly disbursed within the matrix of the coating composition without observable phase separation.
The present invention has been developed in response to problems and needs in the art that have not yet been fully resolved by currently available antimicrobial compositions and methods. Thus, these compositions and methods are developed to reduce complications, such as the risk and occurrence of CRBSIs, by providing improved antimicrobial compositions and methods of application for use in conjunction with medical devices.
The present invention relates to ultraviolet (UV)-curable coatings that have antimicrobial properties. The coatings may be cured by light in the range from about 200 nm to about 600 nm. In some embodiments, it may be preferable to cure the composition with light in the range of about 300 nm to about 450 nm. These coatings are particularly adaptable for use on medical devices, particularly medical devices used in infusion therapy, such as needleless valves, stopcocks, infusion sets, and catheters. As mentioned above, these medical devices are often composed of polymeric materials, especially polycarbonate (PC), polyurethane (PU), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), and acrylics.
In one aspect of the invention the surfaces of such devices are coated with a UV-curable coating (sometimes hereinafter referred to as “UV coating”), which comprises a UV curable composition and additional components incorporated therein, such as antimicrobial agents uniformly distributed throughout its matrix. The antimicrobial agents are able to diffuse through and leach from the matrix and kill microscopic organisms that are in close proximity to the coating surface. The antimicrobial agents, which are uniformly distributed in the UV coating matrix, gradually leach out of the matrix when an IV solution diffuses into the matrix. The antimicrobial agents are then available to kill the microbes that are in close proximity to the coating surface.
The formulations of this invention are generally composed of a combination of urethane or polyester-type oligomers with acrylate functional groups, acrylate monomers, photoinitiators, and antimicrobial agents. The UV coating is in liquid form prior to UV curing. For some formulations, the antimicrobial agents are relatively insoluble in the liquid coating. Accordingly, the systems and methods of the present invention provide UV curable antimicrobial compositions comprising insoluble antimicrobial particles on the nano- or micro-scale that are uniformly distributed throughout the whole coating matrix without the use of a rheological modifying agent.
The coatings of the present invention are solventless and can be sprayed, wiped, dipped or distributed by using other conventional coating methods to coat a substrate's surface. They can then be rapidly cured with ultraviolet light. Curing may be completed in seconds or minutes depending on the formulation and curing conditions. The coatings of the present invention are generally efficacious within minutes instead of hours, as with conventional coatings. The cured coatings are generally colorless and transparent or translucent. The transparency provides the important means to visualize the fluid path within the coated medical device.
A wide variety of polymers can be used within the scope of the present invention. It is only necessary that the oligomers and monomers be capable of UV curing and of suspending or solvating the antimicrobial agents of the type described herein. For example, the oligomers can be acrylated aliphatic urethanes, acrylated aromatic urethanes, acrylated polyesters, unsaturated polyesters, acrylated polyethers, acrylated acrylics, and the like, or combinations of the above. The acrylated functional group can be mono-functional, di-functional, tri-functional, tetra-functional, penta-functional, or hexa-functional.
As with the oligomers, a wide range of monomers can be used in the present compositions. Once again, it is only necessary that the overall composition be UV-curable and that the composition be capable of suspending or solvating the antimicrobial agents. For example, the monomers can be 2-ethyl hexyl acrylate, isooctyl acrylate, isobornylacrylate, 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate, diethylene glycol diacrylate, triethylene glycol diacrylate, pentaerythritol tetra acrylate, penta erythritol tri acrylate, dimethoxy phenyl acetophenone hexyl methyl acrylate, 1,6 hexanidiol methacrylate, and the like, or combinations of these compounds.
In order to allow for UV-curing, the composition should be provided with an adequate and compatible photoinitiator. In certain embodiments of the invention, the photoinitiators can be: 1) single molecule cleavage type, such as benzoin ethers, acetophenones, benzoyl oximes, and acyl phosphine oxide, or 2) hydrogen abstraction type, such as Michler's ketone, thioxanthone, anthroguionone, benzophenone, methyl diethanol amine, 2-N-butoxyethyl-4-(dimethylamino) benzoate, and the like, or combinations of these materials.
Various antimicrobial agents may be used in the compositions of the present invention. In general, antimicrobial agents of the present invention comprise insoluble antimicrobial agents having a particle size of less than 15 μm. The small particle size of the antimicrobial agents facilitates even distribution of the insoluble antimicrobial agent within the matrix of the coating composition without undergoing phase separation.
Previously, a rheological modifying agent was required to modify the viscosity of the coating composition to avoid phase separation. The high viscosity of the coating materials presented difficulties for applying the coating materials by spraying. Solvents were added to the coating materials to decrease the viscosity and improve the flow properties of the coating material. However, these solvents are largely undesirable due to their caustic properties. Further, these solvents are generally flammable and therefore difficult to work with safely. Further still, the addition of solvents decreases the overall viscosity of the coating composition, thereby enhancing phase separation of the antimicrobial agents within the matrix of the coating composition.
In contrast, the coating compositions of the present invention utilize antimicrobial agents of small particle size to provide a stable, low viscosity coating composition that may be applied by spraying without the use of solvents. In some instances, an antimicrobial agent is provided having a particle size of 15 μm or less. The time it takes for phase separation to occur is inversely proportional to the square of the particle sizes. By limiting the mean particle size to be 15 μm or less, the time to phase separation is increased substantially to be practically useful. Thus, a coating formulation is provided which eliminates the need for rheological modifiers and solvents to provide a stable, sprayable coating composition. In particular, the fine particle size is able to stay suspended in the matrix of the UV curable coating without observable phase separation.
The antimicrobial agents of the present invention are generally compatible with the other components of the composition. The antimicrobial agents are further effective in eliminating microbes and other undesirable pathogens. Specifically, it is preferred that that antimicrobial agent not chemically react with the other components of the composition. Examples of suitable antimicrobial agents within the scope of the present invention include aldehydes, anilides, biguanides, elemental silver or its compounds, bis-phenols, and quaternary ammonium compounds and the like or combinations of the above.
The formulations of the present invention also demonstrate good adhesion to numerous plastic surfaces (such as PC, PU, PVC, acrylics, and SBR). The formulation can be cured with adequate ultraviolet light (wavelengths of approximately 200 nm to 600 nm, and in certain embodiments in the range of from about 300 nm to about 450 nm). When cured the coating is substantially transparent or translucent, thus providing a means for visualizing the fluid path of coated medical devices, such as needleless connectors, stopcocks, Luer accessing devices, and IV catheters.
Accordingly, the present invention provides antimicrobial coating compositions that overcome many of the limitations of existing technology. The present invention employs known components which have achieved acceptance for medical use. These components are combined and used easily and efficiently. As set forth above, the compositions of the present invention generally including oligomers, monomers, photoinitiators, and fine insoluble antimicrobial agents. The resulting compositions are easily applied to the surfaces of medical devices and quickly cured by UV light.
The foregoing and other objects and features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the accompanying drawings when considered in conjunction with the following description. Although the drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are thus not to be deemed as limiting the scope of the invention, the accompanying drawings help explain the invention in added detail.
This detailed description of the invention provides additional description of each of the aspects of the invention summarized above. In one aspect of the invention, an antimicrobial ultra violet (UV)-curable coating is provided. The coating comprising a UV curable composition comprising an oligomer, a monomer, and a photoinitiator that are together capable of forming a UV curable polymer composition. Further incorporated within the UV curable coating compositions is an effective antimicrobial agent.
The UV curable coating compositions comprise primarily one or more oligomers and one or more monomers, combined with one or more suitable photoinitiators. In the following discussion, the UV curable coating composition will comprise 100 parts by weight. Materials added to the UV curable coating composition may include soluble antimicrobial agents, insoluble antimicrobial agents, and other additives. These materials will be defined in parts by weight added to 100 parts by weight of the UV curable coating composition.
The oligomer is generally selected from the group consisting of acrylated aliphatic urethanes, acrylated aromatic urethanes, acrylated polyesters, unsaturated polyesters, acrylated polyethers, acrylated acrylics, and the like, or combinations thereof. The acrylated functional group is selected from the group consisting of mono-functional, di-functional, tri-functional, tetra-functional, penta-functional, and hexa-functional acrylates. Any oligomer that is compatible with the other components of the composition is usable within the scope of the present invention. The oligomer will typically comprise from about 10% to about 90% of the UV curable composition. In some embodiments the oligomer will comprise from about 20% to about 80% of the UV curable composition. In certain embodiments of the invention the oligomer will comprise from about 30% to about 70% of the UV curable composition.
The monomer is selected from the group consisting of 2-ethyl hexyl acrylate, isooctyl acrylate, isobornylacrylate, 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate, diethylene glycol diacrylate, triethylene glycol diacrylate, pentaerythritol tetra acrylate, penta erythritol tri acrylate, dimethoxy phenyl acetophenone hexyl methyl acrylate, 1,6 hexanidiol methacrylate and the like, or combinations of these compounds. Once again any monomer that is compatible with the other components of the composition is usable within the scope of the present invention. The monomer will typically comprise from about 5% to about 90% of the UV curable composition. In some embodiments the monomer will comprise from about 10% to about 75% of the UV curable composition. In certain embodiments of the invention the monomer will comprise from about 20% to about 60% of the UV curable composition.
The photoinitiator is selected from the group consisting of single molecule cleavage type, such as benzoin ethers, acetophenones, benzoyl oximes, and acyl phosphine oxide, and hydrogen abstraction types consisting of Michler's ketone, thioxanthone, anthroguionone, benzophenone, methyl diethanol amine, and 2-N-butoxyethyl-4-(dimethylamino)benzoate. The photoinitiator will also be selected such that it is compatible with the other components of the composition identified within the scope of the present invention. The photoinitiator will typically comprise from about 0.5% to about 10% of the UV curable composition. In some embodiments the photoinitiator will comprise from about 1% to about 8.5% of the UV curable composition. In certain embodiments of the invention the photoinitiator will comprise from about 2% to about 7% of the UV curable composition.
The antimicrobial agent is generally selected from the group consisting of aldehydes, anilides, biguanides, silver, silver compounds, bis-phenols, and quaternary ammonium compounds. The antimicrobial agent is generally present in the amount of from about 0.5 to about 50 parts by weight compared to 100 parts by weight of the UV curable composition. In other embodiments, the antimicrobial agent may be present in the amount of from about 0.5 to about 30 parts by weight of the composition. In certain further embodiments, the antimicrobial agent is present in the amount of from about 3 to about 14 parts by weight.
In some instances it is desirable to provide a sprayable, UV curable coating composition containing an insoluble antimicrobial agent. The antimicrobial agent is insoluble in the UV curable coating compositions but is soluble in infusion fluids. The coating is hydrophilic upon curing; therefore in clinical use scenarios, the IV fluid will diffuse into the cured antimicrobial coating and slowly dissolve the antimicrobial agents. The dissolved antimicrobial agent then leaches out of the antimicrobial coating and provides antimicrobial protection to the coated medical devices. The insoluble antimicrobial agent facilitates additional control over the antimicrobial agent's release rate beyond simple diffusion and leaching, thus providing a long lasting antimicrobial efficacy.
Insoluble antimicrobial agents may include any antimicrobial agent or combination of antimicrobial agents that are insolube in the UV curable coating compositions disclosed herein. In some embodiments, insoluble antimicrobial agents may further include antimicrobial agents or combinations of antimicrobial agents having low solubility. Further still, some embodiments of the present invention comprise a mixture of soluble and insoluble antimicrobial agents. In any event, it is preferred that the antimicrobial agent not react chemically with the other components of the compositions.
Non-limiting examples of insoluble antimicrobial agents include chlorhexidine diacetate, chlorhexidine base, alexidine(dihydrochloride), silver sulfadiazine, silver citrate, triclosan, octenidine(dihydrochloride), and rifampicin. Other insoluble antimicrobial agents may include alkylpyridinium iodide, and various amphiphilic peptides which are covalently bound to water-insoluble resins. Additional antimicrobial agents of the present invention may include silver acetate, centrimide, cetyl pyridium chloride, benzalkonium chloride, o-phthalaldehyde, and minocycline. Accordingly, some embodiments of the present invention may include a combination of soluble and insoluble antimicrobial agents.
Generally, insoluble materials are incapable of being dissolved within a liquid or solution. As such, the insoluble materials could separate from the liquid phase over time thereby resulting in a type of phase separation. In the present invention, phase separation of this sort is undesirable. In particular, phase separation by which insoluble antimicrobial agents are separated from the remaining components of the UV curable composition is undesirable.
Phase separation within an antimicrobial coating composition generally results in an uneven distribution of the insoluble antimicrobial agent within the coating material. This may lead to uneven disbursement of the antimicrobial agent in the final coating on the medical device. Accordingly, the present invention overcomes this type of phase separation by controlling the particle size of the antimicrobial agent. As such, a stable UV curable coating composition is provided.
The particle size of the antimicrobial agents of the present invention provides a significant delay in the phase separation process, thereby providing sufficient time to prepare, apply and cure the UV curable coating prior to observable phase separation. The velocity of a spherical antimicrobial particle falling in the viscous fluid matrix of the coating composition is proportional to the square of the radius of the antimicrobial agent sphere. Therefore, as the particle size of the antimicrobial agent decreases, the time it takes for phase separation to occur increases significantly. Additionally, antimicrobial particles do not create networks, as is observed with rheological modifiers, such as fumed silica. Thus, antimicrobial agent(s) may be added to the coating composition without substantially affecting the viscosity of the coating composition.
In some embodiments, a sprayable, UV curable coating composition comprises an insoluble antimicrobial agent having a particle size of less than approximately 10 μm, wherein the insoluble antimicrobial agent is present at a concentration of less than approximately 8.9% by weight to the remaining components of the UV curable coating composition. In other embodiments, a sprayable, UV curable coating composition comprises an insoluble antimicrobial agent having a particle size of less than approximately 15 μm, wherein the insoluble antimicrobial agent is present at a concentration of less than 14.0% by weight to the remaining components of the UV curable coating composition. Further, in some embodiments, a sprayable, UV curable coating composition comprises an insoluble antimicrobial agent having a reduced particle size at a concentration from approximately 2.0% to approximately 14%, by weight.
The UV curable coating compositions of the present invention further comprise a working viscosity that permits the coating composition to be applied to a medical device by spraying. Accordingly, some embodiments of the present invention include an insoluble antimicrobial agent having at least one of the previously indicated reduced particle sizes, wherein the coating composition has a viscosity from approximately 5 centipoise to approximately 500 centipoise.
The use of insoluble antimicrobial agents having this particle size imparts two advantages to the UV curable coating composition over the prior art. First, the reduced particle size eliminates the need for a rheological modifier to prevent phase separation. The fine particle size of the antimicrobial agent is able to stay suspended in the matrix of the UV curable coating without observable phase separation. As such, the insoluble antimicrobial agent remains evenly distributed throughout the matrix of the coating composition throughout the application and UV curing processes. Once cured, the insoluble antimicrobial agent is free to leach out of the cured matrix of the coating, thereby imparting antimicrobial activity to fluids and surfaces in contact with, or in proximity to the coated surface of the medical device.
Second, the UV curable coating composition is significantly less viscous than the prior art formulations, which require the use of a rheological modifier to prevent phase separation. Accordingly, the combined advantages of the present invention provide a sprayable, UV curable coating composition in which insoluble antimicrobial agents may be used without requiring rheological modifiers or harsh solvents.
Some UV coating formulations of the present invention can be urethane or polyester type acrylate such as 7104, 7101, 7124-K, 7105-5K from Electronic Materials Inc. (EMI) (Breckenridge, Colo.), 1168-M, I-20781 from Dymax Corporation (Torrington, Conn.), and UV 630 from Permabond Engineering Adhesives (Somerset, N.J.).
The antimicrobial coating according to the present invention can be applied to wide range of medical devices used in infusion therapy such as, but not limited to, needleless connectors, stopcocks, IV sets, IV catheters, and Luer accessing devices.
Needleless connectors coated with UV-curable coating compositions including chlorhexidine diacetate (CHA) within the scope of the present invention were tested for efficacy together with two commercially available needleless connectors: one with a silver based antimicrobial formulation and the other with a CHA impregnated septum.
Samples #1. Composition per present invention with chlorhexidine diacetate 1%
2. Composition per present invention with chlorhexidine diacetate 3%
3. Composition per present invention with chlorhexidine diacetate 5%
4. Composition per present invention with chlorhexidine diacetate 9%
5. Needleless connector with chlorhexidine/silver impregnated septum
6. Needleless connector with silver based antimicrobial coating
Each sample was tested on three (3) microbial agents, namely: Staphylococcus epidermidis (gram positive bacteria); Pseudomonas aeruginosa (gram negative bacteria); and Candida albicans (yeast or fungi). The contact time was 24 hours. Some of the samples were preconditioned for 7 days with continuous IV fluid flowing through the samples prior to testing. The results are summarized in the table of
The antimicrobial agent elution rate is well defined and can be controlled by controlling the coating thickness, coverage area, and antimicrobial agent concentration. In this example, the eluted chlorhexidine diacetate concentration within a Luer device is plotted as a function of the coating thickness (unit: mil or 0.001 inch), coating height (unit: inch), and chlorhexidine diacetate concentration (unit: % weight/weight). The Luer device had a cylindrical internal volume that was 1 inch high and had an internal volume of 0.12 ml in the range of internal volumes of many needleless connectors. The eluted CHA concentration is for devices after 7 days of pre-conditioning. Since the minimum inhibitory concentration for Staphylococcus epidermidis is 2 μg/ml, the coating formulation and coverage area can be easily designed to maintain adequate efficacy over an extended usage time. The results of these tests are shown in
Phase separation time comparison of fine CHA versus coarse CHA without a rheology modifier was conducted. Two antimicrobial coating suspensions were prepared; 100 mL of each suspension in graduated cylinders were monitoried for phase separation. Each suspension contained 10% (w/w) CHA in an acrylate-based UV curable coating solution. A control suspension sample was provided comprising 10% by weight coarse CHA with a mean particle size of 17 μm. A test suspension sample was also provided comprising 10% by weight fine CHA (Medichem, Spain) with a mean particle size of 6 μm. Mean particle sizes were determined from a particle size distribution measured via an image-based particle counter.
The suspensions were incubated at room temperature and images of the suspensions were taken at (a) t=0 minutes (immediately after mixing), (b) t=20 minutes, (c) t=5 hours, and (d) t=16 hours. Phase separation was observed in the control suspension at t=20 minutes, while phase separation was delayed and undetected in the test suspension until t=16 hours. Accordingly, the test suspension showed a 48-fold increase in suspension stability over the control suspension. Thus, reduction of the particle size substantially delayed phase separation in the antimicrobial coating test suspension. Images taken during this experiment are shown in
It is underscored that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments herein should be deemed only as illustrative.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3223629 | Loeffler | Dec 1965 | A |
| 3695921 | Shepherd et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3986508 | Barrington | Oct 1976 | A |
| 4170996 | Wu | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4334551 | Pfister | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4339336 | Hammond et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4387879 | Tauschinski | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4449693 | Gereg | May 1984 | A |
| 4512766 | Vailancourt | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4584192 | Dell et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4592920 | Murtfeldt | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4603152 | Laurin et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4629743 | Hong | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4629746 | Michl et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4642126 | Zador et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4676782 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4677143 | Laurin et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4716032 | Westfall et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4758225 | Cox et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4798594 | Hillstead | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4842591 | Luther | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4874377 | Newgard et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4895566 | Lee | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4897427 | Barnavon et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4915934 | Tomlinson | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4917668 | Haindl | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4925668 | Khan et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4933178 | Capelli | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4935010 | Cox et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4950257 | Hibbs et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4955890 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4985399 | Matsuda et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4990357 | Karakelle et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5019096 | Fox, Jr. et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5023082 | Friedman et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5030665 | Lee et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5041097 | Johnson | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5053014 | Van Heugten | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5062836 | Wendell | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5064416 | Newgard et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5077352 | Elton | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5078703 | Bryant | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5084023 | Lemieux | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5085645 | Purdy et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5098410 | Kerby et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5108374 | Lemieux | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5127905 | Lemieux | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5154703 | Bonaldo | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5156596 | Balbierz et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5217493 | Raad et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5234410 | Graham et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5242425 | White et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5290246 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5295969 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5330435 | Vaillancourt | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5350363 | Goode et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5352205 | Dales et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5357636 | Dresdner, Jr. et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5366505 | Farber | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5405323 | Rogers et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5456675 | Wolbring et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5456948 | Mathisen et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5487728 | Vaillancourt | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5512199 | Khan et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5520666 | Choudhury et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5540661 | Tomisaka et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5547662 | Khan et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549566 | Elias et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549577 | Siegel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5575769 | Vaillancourt | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5613663 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5616338 | Fox, Jr. et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5620434 | Brony | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5629006 | Hoang et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5638812 | Turner | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5651772 | Arnett | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5653695 | Hopkins et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5657963 | Hinchliffe et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5688747 | Khan et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5697915 | Lynn | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5698229 | Ohsumi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5712229 | Hopkins et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5716406 | Farber | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5738144 | Rogers | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5749861 | Guala et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5763412 | Khan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5773487 | Sokol | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5806831 | Paradis | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5817069 | Arnett | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5830196 | Hicks | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5833674 | Turnbull et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5843046 | Motisi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5861440 | Gohla et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5911710 | Barry et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5954698 | Pike | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5967490 | Pike | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6039302 | Cote, Sr. et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6046143 | Khan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6051609 | Yu et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6077244 | Botich et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6117108 | Woehr et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120784 | Snyder, Jr. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6127320 | van Ooij et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6165168 | Russo | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6171287 | Lynn et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6242526 | Siddiqui et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248811 | Ottersbach et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6273869 | Vaillancourt | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6326417 | Jia | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6337357 | Fukunishi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6344218 | Dodd et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6353041 | Qian | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6413539 | Shalaby | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6426373 | Stange | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6475434 | Darouiche | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6485473 | Lynn | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6488942 | Ingemann | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6492445 | Siddiqui et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6544214 | Utterberg | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6575960 | Becker et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6576633 | Young et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6579539 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6595981 | Huet | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6699221 | Vaillancourt | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6719726 | Meng et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6719991 | Darouiche et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6723350 | Burrell et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6740063 | Lynn | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6808161 | Hishikawa | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6843784 | Modak et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6846846 | Modak et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6861060 | Luriya et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6883778 | Newton et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6887270 | Miller et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6896889 | Chevalier et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 7008404 | Nakajima | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7074839 | Fansler et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7098256 | Ong | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7179849 | Terry | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7198800 | Ko | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7232428 | Inukai et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7232540 | Gould et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7261925 | Nesbitt | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7268165 | Greten et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7347839 | Hiejima | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7374798 | Choo et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7396346 | Nakajima | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7407707 | Gould et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7462401 | Halfyard et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7470254 | Basta et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7494339 | Dias et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7498367 | Qian | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7514477 | Klare et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7608082 | Cuevas et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7704935 | Davis et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7736339 | Woehr et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7816434 | Hackbarth et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7871649 | Modak et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7874467 | Pardes et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7914494 | Hiejima | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7981475 | Takahashi | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8034454 | Terry | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8034455 | Wang et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8067402 | Whiteford et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8227050 | O'Neil | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8231602 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8263102 | Labrecque et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8268381 | Whiteford et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8343523 | Toreki et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8343525 | Davis et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8357119 | Stout et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8388583 | Stout et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8414547 | DiFiore et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8512294 | Ou-Yang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8622995 | Ziebol et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8622996 | Ziebol et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8728030 | Woehr | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8840927 | Ditizio et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 9078441 | Raad | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9138252 | Bierman et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 20010010016 | Modak et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010016589 | Modak et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010018095 | Shlenker et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010032006 | Griffin, III et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010053895 | Vaillancourt | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010056133 | Montgomery et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020009436 | Doyle et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020022660 | Jampani et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020028751 | Lokkesmoe et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020037260 | Budny et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020040092 | Siddiqui et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020064858 | Yacoby-Zeevi | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091424 | Biel | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020119111 | Kilgour et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133124 | Leinsing et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020144705 | Brattesani et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030023208 | Osypka et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030060804 | Vaillancourt | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030068667 | Olson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030072781 | Pelerin | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105143 | Ammendola et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119932 | Al-Akhdar et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030134783 | Harshey et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144362 | Utterberg et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030147932 | Nun et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030162839 | Symington et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030170308 | Cleary et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030176848 | Gibson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030206875 | Budny et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030215433 | Kokai-Kun et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030224032 | Read et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040013574 | Conway | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040013703 | Ralph et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040014864 | Milic et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039349 | Modak et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040058829 | Hei et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040109852 | Xu | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040115477 | Nesbitt | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040132164 | Doyle et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040180829 | Bassler et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040185296 | Mazzanti | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230162 | Tan | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040234475 | Lannibois-Drean et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050008671 | Van Antwerp | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050048005 | Stockel | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050048124 | Sarangapani | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050059731 | Albrecht et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080158 | Ong et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050100580 | Osborne et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050118239 | Sabesan | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050124970 | Kunin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131356 | Ash et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050143286 | Singh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050148928 | Molina et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050158253 | Budny et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050176905 | Moon et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050233950 | Madhyastha | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050265931 | Qian | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060024372 | Utterberg et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060051385 | Scholz | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060163515 | Ruschke | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060165751 | Chudzik et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060165903 | Mazzanti | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060177477 | Ash et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060239954 | Sancho | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258780 | Chaussade et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060281663 | Asmus | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070000407 | Leong | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083157 | Belley et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083162 | O'Reagan et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112112 | Kerschner et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112146 | Falk et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070129690 | Rosenblatt et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070141524 | Brennan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070160547 | Duffy et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070166344 | Qu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070202177 | Hoang | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203574 | McGrath et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225179 | Schutz et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233007 | Adams | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070275101 | Lu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070281198 | Lousenberg | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080026026 | Lu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080039796 | Nakajima | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051737 | Paul et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080075761 | Modak et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080108944 | Woehr et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080119789 | Kaemmerer | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080161763 | Harding et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080182921 | Suh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080194707 | Potter | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20090012220 | Yamane et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090036768 | Seehusen et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090101152 | Burk et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090110844 | Platzer et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090114327 | Breunig | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090117164 | Toreki et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125118 | Gong | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090162530 | Nesbitt | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090176907 | Subramanian et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090188559 | Nesbitt | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090220739 | Chougule | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090226541 | Scholz et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090281525 | Harding et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090317435 | Vandesteeg et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090324666 | Krongauz et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100106102 | Ziebol et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100135949 | Ou-Yang | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100136209 | Ou-Yang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100137379 | Ou-Yang | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100137472 | Ou-Yang | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100204648 | Stout et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100204675 | Woehr et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100222746 | Burkholz | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110009831 | Burkholz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110065798 | Hoang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110146680 | Conway | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110150958 | Davis et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110160663 | Stout et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110218529 | Garcia et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301553 | Goral et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110319825 | Goral et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120083750 | Sansoucy | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120103448 | Hopf et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20130165868 | Isaacson et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130196079 | Schwalm | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130245568 | Kerr | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130274686 | Ziebol et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1331333 | Aug 1994 | CA |
| 2133053 | Mar 1995 | CA |
| 1187598 | Jul 1998 | CN |
| 1526771 | Sep 2004 | CN |
| 101353545 | Jan 2009 | CN |
| 102070983 | May 2011 | CN |
| 4011867 | Oct 1991 | DE |
| 0 036 294 | Sep 1981 | EP |
| 0 070 087 | Jan 1983 | EP |
| 0 338 418 | Oct 1989 | EP |
| 0 370 997 | May 1990 | EP |
| 0 379 271 | Jul 1990 | EP |
| 0 396 431 | Nov 1990 | EP |
| 0 414 997 | Mar 1991 | EP |
| 0 778 337 | Nov 1997 | EP |
| 0 992 252 | Apr 2000 | EP |
| 05-277434 | Oct 1993 | JP |
| 07-051651 | Feb 1995 | JP |
| H07-47435 | Feb 1995 | JP |
| 08-209064 | Aug 1996 | JP |
| 8-311373 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| 09-151262 | Jun 1997 | JP |
| 09-157548 | Jun 1997 | JP |
| H09-176677 | Jul 1997 | JP |
| H10-231 | Jan 1998 | JP |
| H11-322560 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| 2000-178475 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 2000-264803 | Sep 2000 | JP |
| 2001-072438 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 2002-282762 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2003-342402 | Dec 2003 | JP |
| 2004-043669 | Feb 2004 | JP |
| 2005-028209 | Feb 2005 | JP |
| 2005-515838 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005-520912 | Jul 2005 | JP |
| 2007-016096 | Jan 2007 | JP |
| 2010-536836 | Dec 2010 | JP |
| 20020066429 | Aug 2002 | KR |
| 20080039460 | May 2008 | KR |
| 9422522 | Oct 1994 | WO |
| 9521648 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| 9640359 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| 9858690 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| 9858989 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| 9932168 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| 9934849 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| 9936490 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| 9943971 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| 0066189 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| 0074743 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO01-95862 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| 2004108091 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| 2005037340 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| 2006056482 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| 2006074666 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| 2006088288 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| 2006099358 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| 2006099359 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| 2007064835 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| 2007095576 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| 2007100653 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| 2007100776 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| 2008014438 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2008014447 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2008031601 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| 2008045761 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| 2008128896 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| 2008132045 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| 2009070227 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2011005951 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| 2011034675 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| 2011048204 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| 2011118680 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2012036916 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| 2013009998 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| 2013134421 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Ciba Irgacure 500 data sheet from Ciba Speciality Chemicals. online. retrieved on [Dec. 13, 2015]. retrieved from interent <URL://http://www.conquimica.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ft—irgacure—500.pdf>. |
| Anusavice KJ, Zhang N-Z, Shen C. Controlled Release of Chlorhexidine from UDMA-TEGDMA Resin. Journal of dental research. 2006;85(10):950-954. |
| “ComfortCoat Hydrophilic Coating,” DSM in Medical, http://www.dsm.com/en—US/medical/public/home/pages/product-coating-comfortcoat.jsp, Updated Jan. 11, 2013, Printed Apr. 22, 2013. |
| “Lubricent—Lubricious Hydrophillic Coatings for Medical Devices,” Harland Medical Systems, http://www.harlandmedical.com/index.php/materials/lubricent.html, pp. 1-2, Printed Apr. 22, 2013. |
| “UV & EB Cure,” Xiper Innovations, Inc., http://xiperinnovations.com/uv—eb—cure, Printed Apr. 22, 2013. |
| Cabot Corporation, “Using Silicas and Aluminas in Coatings,”, www.cabot-corp.com/Silicas-And-Aluminas/Coatings, downloaded from the internet on Apr. 26, 2011. |
| McDonnell, G., Russell, A.D. Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, (1999) 12(1), pp. 149-179. |
| Elson Silva, PhD, “Respecting Hydrology Science in the Patenting System,” pp. 1-7, Jan. 13, 2011. |
| Gama Healthcare, Clinell Alcoholic 2% Chlorhexidine, http://www.gamahealthcare.com/clinellaca2c.html, pp. 1-3, Nov. 7, 2008. |
| Enturia, ChloraPrep, http://www.enturia.com/products/chloraPrep-product.html, pp. 1-3, Oct. 31, 2008. |
| Sage Products, Inc., Address Multi-Drug Resistant Organism on the Skin with Early Preop Prep, http://www.sageproducts.com/products/ssi-prevention.cfm, 1 page, Oct. 31, 2008. |
| Sage Products, Inc., Preoperative Skin Preparation and Perioperative Oral Care for the Short-Term Ventilated Patient, http://www.sageproducts.com/products/ssi-vap-prevention.cfm, 1 page, Oct. 31, 2008. |
| Sage Products, Inc., Preoperative Skin Preparation for the Surgical Patient, http://www.sageproducts.com/products/skin-prep.cfm, 1 page, Oct. 31, 2008. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140228466 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |