1. Field of the Disclosure
This disclosure relates generally to trip mechanisms for snowplows and, more specifically, to V-blade snowplows having a dual trip mechanism.
2. Related Technology
Generally speaking, snowplow blades come in two different types, a straight blade and an adjustable or V-blade. The straight blade generally extends across the front of a vehicle, such as a truck. Some straight blades may be angularly adjustable relative to the longitudinal axis of the vehicle. For example, some straight blades may have the capability to angle the straight blade relative to the longitudinal axis of the vehicle. While straight blades generally push snow well, they are not very adaptable to plowing confined areas or odd-shaped areas.
V-blade snowplows, on the other hand, are more adaptable. V-blades are formed by two wings or blades (a driver's side blade or left wing, and a passenger's side blade or right wing) that meet at a center hinge. Each blade may be independently adjustable relative to the longitudinal axis of the vehicle. As a result, the V-blade may have multiple useful configurations. For example, the V-blade may take on a V-shape with each blade extending at an angle from the center hinge, rearwardly toward the vehicle. The V-blade may also take on an inverted V-shape or scoop configuration, where each blade extends at an angle forward from the center hinge, away from the vehicle. Finally, the V-blade may mimic a straight blade by having one blade extend forward from the center hinge and another blade extending rearward from the center hinge. As a result of the different configurations, the V-blade is known to be generally more adaptable to unique plow areas, especially confined plow areas.
In practice, areas to be snow plowed are rarely flat and level. To the contrary, most plowing areas have uneven terrain and even obstacles extending upward from the plowing surface, such as curbs, manhole covers, reflectors, ADA-mandated tactile warning tiles, and other objects. Snowplow blades must have the capability to adjust to the uneven terrain and to overcome the obstacles without breaking the obstacle or the blade. When a snowplow blade meets an obstacle, it “trips” in one or more directions to allow the blade, or a portion of the blade, to adjust so that the snowplow blade may pass over the obstacle. Generally, there are two types of trip mechanisms: An edge trip mechanism and a full blade trip mechanism.
In edge trip mechanisms, a cutting edge strip is hingedly attached along the bottom edge of a main blade or moldboard. The cutting edge strip is biased forward, into general alignment with the bottom of the moldboard, by one or more springs. When an obstacle is encountered, and enough force is generated to overcome the spring bias, the cutting edge strip pivots rearward, allowing the main blade to pass over the obstacle. Once the obstacle has been passed over, the spring-biased cutting edge strip returns, due to the spring bias, to its normal untripped position. The cutting edge strip is typically made of a sacrificial material, such that it is slowly worn away during the plowing process through friction with the plowing surface. As the sacrificial material wears down, the maximum obstacle clearance height is slowly reduced because the maximum height of the cutting edge strip is reduced. Eventually, the user must replace the cutting edges. One drawback of the edge trip mechanisms is that they are obstacle height-limited. In other words, if an obstacle is encountered that is higher than the thin cutting edge strip, the obstacle will contact the main blade (even if the thin cutting edge strip rotates out of the way). Such an encounter can cause damage to the main blade, the blade mounting hardware, and/or the vehicle itself.
In full blade trip mechanisms, the full blade assembly is pivotably mounted to the vehicle. The pivot axis is generally located above the top of the cutting edge. One or more trip springs bias the two moldboards and their respective cutting edges (which, in conventional V-blade plows, were fixedly-, as opposed to hingedly-, secured to the base of the respective moldboards) into a plowing position. When an obstacle is encountered, and the trip spring bias is overcome, the full blade assembly pivots about the pivot axis, which causes the full moldboards to rotate rearward and upward, thereby clearing the obstacle. As with the cutting edges of edge trip mechanisms, once the obstacle has been cleared, the full moldboards return to their original, un-tripped position. While the full blade trip mechanism generally is capable of clearing relatively high obstacles, the force required to overcome the spring bias is greater than edge trip mechanisms, which causes greater impact forces to be transferred to the vehicle. These greater impact forces can be unpleasant for a driver and any other occupants of the vehicle.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,658,519 and 7,437,839, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference, disclose V-blade snowplows. The V-blade snowplow 10 of the present disclosure employs the main components of those patents, as well as enhancements that provide the V-blade snowplow 10 with both trip edge as well as full moldboard trip capabilities. While V-blade snowplows have been manufactured in the past with either trip edge capability or full moldboard trip capability, heretofore there has yet to be a V-blade snowplow that successfully offered both trip edge and full moldboard trip.
The V-blade snowplow 10 includes a left or first wing having a first moldboard 12 and a right or second wing a second moldboard 14, both of which are secured to a pivot frame 16 by a central hinge 18. A first cutting edge 20 is associated with the first moldboard 12, and a second cutting edge 22 is associated with the second moldboard 14. Each of the first and second cutting edges 20, 22 may include a sacrificial element of the V-blade snowplow 10, in that it is made of a material intended to wear down over time without compromising the integrity of the respective first and second moldboards 12, 14.
Each of the first and second cutting edges 20, 22 is hingedly mounted to its respective moldboard 12, 14 by a plurality of trip edge springs 24 (see
The first and second cutting edges 20, 22 may each include a plurality of bolt-receiving apertures 21 along an upper edge thereof to facilitate removable securement of replacement cutting edges (not shown) to the first and second cutting edges 20, 22. In this manner, a snowplow owner need not detach the first and second cutting edges 20, 22 from the torsion trip edge springs 24 when the original factory-installed cutting edges wear to an appreciable extent, but instead, can simply bolt replacement sacrificial edges to the remaining hingedly-attached portions of the original cutting edges 20, 22.
The selection of stiffness of trip edge springs 24, as well as the stiffness of trip springs 38 for full moldboard trip, is guided in major part by a trade-off between the desire to enable the cutting edge of the snowplow to trip upon contact with an immovable object on a roadway being plowed, on the one hand, and the desire to avoid the edge (or the full moldboard) tripping when plowing heavy, wet snow and ice. By providing both trip edge and full moldboard trip capabilities in a single V-blade assembly, the V-blade snowplow 10 of the present disclosure can utilize stiffer trip springs (preferably four trip springs 38 mounted in parallel) for the full moldboard trip (as compared to trip springs of conventional full moldboard trip-only V-blade snowplows), and stiffer trip edge springs 24, (as compared to conventional trip edge-only V-blade snowplows) without increasing forces transferred to a cab of a truck to which the V-blade snowplow 10 is secured. This is due to the fact that the full moldboard trip capability and the trip edges provide back-up to one another—a stiffer moldboard that is less susceptible to tripping due to heavy snow will still, due to the provision of trip edges, mitigate the translation of forces to the truck cab from impacts with stationary objects on a roadway being plowed (provided the height of those objects is no higher than the height of the cutting edges). By way of example only, a suitable stiffness or spring rate for each of the torsion trip edge springs 24 for the V-blade snowplow of the present disclosure is 68 lb.-in./deg., but could be higher, or lower, and a suitable stiffness or spring rate for each of the trip springs 38, which are extension springs as opposed to torsion springs, is 145 lb./in, but could be higher, or lower.
In utilizing the dual trip mode capability of the present disclosure, impact testing has reflected a significant reduction in forces transferred to the vehicle as compared to vehicles provided with snowplows having only edge trip capability. More specifically, between speeds of 5 to 14 miles per hour, with 14 MPH being an industry-standard recommended maximum plowing speed, a V-blade snowplow 10 of the present disclosure having dual trip mode capability experiences an average reduction of 65% of the force transferred to the vehicle when impacting an object with the cutting edge 20 or 22 near an outside end of the snowplow blade 12 or 14.
The four trip springs 38 are mounted in parallel between an upper rear portion of a push frame 40 and a generally-horizontally extending elongate portion of a hanger bar 42, which hanger bar 42 is secured to a rear portion of the central hinge 18. A turnbuckle 44 may be provided intermediate each of the trip springs 38 and the push frame 40.
Advantageously, the full moldboard trip capability of the V-blade snowplow 10 of the present disclosure gives the snowplow the ability to trip, and thereby mitigate translation of forces upon impacts with objects of a height that is greater than the cutting edge. This is of particular concern to V-blade snowplow operators as the cutting edges of the snowplow wear down, as the height of immovable objects over which cutting edges of a trip edge-only V-plow can clear diminishes as the cutting edges wear down and lose their overall height.
Another drawback of conventional trip edge-only V-plow snowplows is that the angle of rotation of conventional cutting edges when tripped in a direction rearward from the contour of the front of the moldboard is so great, typically at least about 60°, that the cutting edges are susceptible to being stuck in their tripped condition by snow, ice, dirt, or other debris caught between the top of the cutting edge and the base of the moldboard. Because the trip edge capability is not the only means for the V-blade snowplow 10 to trip when striking an object, the cutting edges 20, 22 need not rotate rearward from the contour of the respective moldboards 12, 14 as much as conventional trip edges. For instance, the plurality of torsion trip edge springs 24 are preferably selected and mounted so as to permit an angle of rotation of the cutting edges 20, 22 relative to the respective moldboards 12, 14 in the range of about 30° to about 40°, and preferably about 40°, i.e. about 20° smaller of an angle of rotation than the typical angle of maximum deflection of trip edge-only V-plow cutting edges. As a result, less snow, ice, or other debris can enter the region between the tripped cutting edge 20, 22 and the base of the respective moldboard 12, 14. Moreover, by reducing the maximum degree of deflection through which the cutting edges 20, 22 rotate from a rest condition to a fully-tripped condition, the fatigue on the trip edge springs 24 is reduced. As explained above, the smaller degree of maximum deflection of the cutting edges 20, 22 also permits the use of stiffer trip edge springs 24.
An additional drawback of conventional trip edge-only V-plow snowplows is that such snowplows, when the wings are arranged in a V, have diminished ability to trip in response to a center impact with an object having a height less than the height of the cutting edges (or even off-center impacts that would cause both cutting edges to trip simultaneously) due to the cutting edges at least momentarily binding with one another at the plow center while attempting to rotate. The V-blade snowplow 10 of the present disclosure, with its dual trip capability, advantageously supplies the full moldboard trip capability even in such instances of center impacts where tripping of cutting edges 20, 22 is precluded, as depicted in
While the present disclosure has been described with respect to certain embodiments, it will be understood that variations can be made thereto that are still within the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. provisional application No. 61/607,307, filed Mar. 6, 2012, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1891046 | Gettleman | Dec 1932 | A |
2055291 | Henry | Sep 1936 | A |
3772803 | Cote | Nov 1973 | A |
4074448 | Niemela | Feb 1978 | A |
4384620 | Uchida et al. | May 1983 | A |
4597202 | Weeks | Jul 1986 | A |
4907358 | Moore | Mar 1990 | A |
5437113 | Jones | Aug 1995 | A |
5697172 | Verseef | Dec 1997 | A |
7743536 | Evans et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20060107555 | Curtis | May 2006 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Meyer® product fact sheet, ©2006, illustrating snowplows with separate “Diamond Edge” bottom-trip and Aggressor® full-trip capabilities. |
Meyer® Road-Pro™ product fact sheet, ©2010, illustrating snowplows with separate bottom-trip and full-trip capabilities. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130232827 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61607307 | Mar 2012 | US |