An examination of the relevant prior art discloses that the complex relationships related to volume and velocity of liquid flow in a siphon, the volume and bubble sizes of the entrapped air with the resulting changes in density are significantly oversimplified and expressed mathematically or in terms of total air in the liquid. In addition, the positioning of the air insertion plates pointing downward from the apex of the siphon ignores the propensity for bubbles to agglomerate and rise from the entry point in the absence of an adequate sweeping effect from liquid flowing directly across the interfacing surface. No means has ever been described for removing any pockets of air and/or gas that could accumulate. The air plate at the apex entry point also refers to “small holes” for producing small bubbles without regard for any degree of the actual hole size necessary for producing sufficiently small bubbles or to any procedure for attaining same. It is furthermore unclear from the prior art as to how the transition from priming the siphon system to the introduction of air bubbles through the top air plate while maintaining the prime and elevating the apex air entry point above 10 m can be accomplished without manipulating the basic laws of physics. The most relevant prior art examined to date appears not to be workable as presented.
A prime example of such a disclosure of an attempt to solve the problem and the closest prior art to the Present Invention is U.S. Pat. No. 4,396,842 issued to Bonghan Jhun on Aug. 2, 1983 (hereinafter “Juhn”), entitled “Tidal Power Generation Utilizing the Atmospheric Pressure.” Juhn relies on a dam 14 to create two different water levels on either side, and places an inverted U-structure 20 (shown with perpendicular corners) on either side of the dam. The problem of running a siphon of this type with rapidly flowing liquid is that air tends to accumulate at the top of the structure. Very small bubbles will be carried away with the downflowing liquid. Recognizing the need for the air intake 32 to be broken into small bubbles, Juhn places a plate 40 with small holes 41 at the exit 33 of the air tube 30. However, the liquid downflow velocity must be sufficiently high to carry the air bubbles away. Juhn places his air intake at the top of the structure, a place where the downflow velocity is low. Juhn's porous plate does not work because it is at the apex of the structure. The bubbles will not diffuse through the liquid. In addition, Juhn is silent regarding the diameters of the holes in the plate. The bubbles must be extremely small. Furthermore, the horizontal length of the U-structure top 21, 22, is relatively long. Air would tend to accumulate along the inside top 22 of the structure. The air 32 flows only in one direction, i.e., into the structure. Eventually, enough air accumulates in the top chamber to kill the siphon effect. Juhn also uses a valve 11 to control the liquid flow velocity. This slows down the downflow, thereby causing more air accumulation. Finally, Juhn makes no provision for priming the system. As disclosed by Juhn, it is doubtful that his system would function as described.
Juhn's porous plate positioned at the top of the structure will cause accumulation of air in the structure. This will eventually shut down the siphon. Also, the bubbles must be small enough to be carried away with the downflow. They must be micro-bubbles. The Present Invention inserts a micro-bubble diffuser into the downstream flow where the downflow velocity is sufficient to carry the bubbles away. The diameters of the porous openings should be in the order of five microns, and no greater than ten microns. To create such small bubbles, the micro-bubble diffuser comprises either a hydrophobic membrane or multiple tubules having diameters less than or equal to ten microns.
The first embodiment uses a hydrophobic microporous membrane. The microporous membrane is a thin, planar or cylindrical sheet of polymeric material containing a very large number of microscopic pores. These membranes are available in both hydrophilic (water filtering) and hydrophobic (water-repellent) forms. Hydrophobic membranes block liquids, while allowing air to flow through the membrane. Currently, PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene), polypropylene, PVDF (polyvinylidene difluoride), and acrylic copolymer are mostly used to produce these membranes. These polymers undergo special treatment to exhibit the desired surface characteristics.
The second embodiment uses multiple tubules having inside diameters less than or equal to ten microns. These microtubules extend into the downstream flow in a direction perpendicular to the flow. They are flexible, and they bend in the direction of the flow.
The Present Invention uses a vacuum pump to prime the siphon. Once the flow starts, the priming pumping action discontinues. Furthermore, at least one parallel siphon system acts as a scavenger loop to prevent air from accumulating at the apex of the system.
Juhn uses flow regulating valves to control the flow of both air and water. The Present Invention uses valves only for starting and isolating systems. The Present Invention does not require valves to regulate the flow of liquid, because the air flow would suffer a loss of pressure if valves were used to restrict air flow.
Juhn does not address how to dispose of floatables and other debris that undoubtedly collects over time. This problem is handled by the scoop action at the entrance to the scavenger columns.
The Present Invention enables energy to be extracted from the atmosphere by creating a vacuum into which atmospheric air is drawn through a vacuum operated motor. The motor operates on the pressure differential between atmospheric pressure at the motor inlet and the vacuum level created by liquid flowing vertically through a tube via gravity. The greater the pressure differential, the greater the airflow through the motor, and the greater the energy extracted by the vacuum motor.
The design features unique to the Present Invention that are paramount to a workable and sustainable vacuum energy recovery system based on siphon principles specifically address problem areas immediately identifiable to a siphon-based system with air infusion. In the Present Invention, a scavenger loop operates independently to prevent air and/or gas from accumulating at the siphon apex. Micro-diffusers designed for sweeping effects across the air-liquid interfaces also provide for the optimal ratios of air volumes and bubble sizes compatible with the liquid flow rates within a given siphon. Additional flow controlling valves are not required.
The Present Invention enables energy to be extracted from the atmosphere by creating a vacuum into which atmospheric air is drawn through a vacuum operated motor. The vacuum is created by water flowing at high speeds through a pipe. The water flows continuously based on the siphon effect. As the water flows past an air inlet positioned perpendicular to the direction of flow, air is drawn into the water column. If a vacuum motor is connected to the air inlet, the rotor spins. A windshield wiper motor is a typical vacuum motor. Energy is then generated by a vacuum motor connected to the air inlet when the vacuum is applied. Vacuum energy is converted therein to mechanical movement via a pivoting piston.
The Present Invention is fail-safe in that it would shut down from an incident causing loss of vacuum. Residual water would gravity drain. There would be no pressure, water or air related problems. The Present Invention is highly maintainable in that components critical to operation are positioned above water surfaces and are easily accessible. Transparent materials of construction may be used to enable visual observation of micro-diffuser operations. The Present Invention is highly flexible in that systems are composed of units, which can be assembled as modules and scaled up to increase capacity as desired. The Present Invention is designed to handle solids in that inside diameters of components, which carry flowing water, contain no obstructions to flow and can be sized to pass any solids present in the flowing medium. The Present Invention is corrosion resistant in that components, which are exposed to potentially corrosive liquids, can be fabricated from materials resistance to those elements (e.g., saline or brackish water). The mechanical motors, which operate on a vacuum, receive filtered atmospheric air, not liquids at the inlets. The negative pressure-operating mode of the Present Invention permits fabrication using the lighter weight thin wall materials of construction. Lightweight plastics can be considered. The startup procedure requires an outside vacuum source for priming. Once primed and steady state operation is confirmed, the startup vacuum is discontinued. The Present Invention will operate in a self-sustaining mode once steady-state operation is attained, and the low energy source remains constant. No additional control is needed following startup in achieving steady-state operation.
Overall costs for the Present Invention can be significantly competitive. Most components and materials are commercially available. Fabrication using low weight materials lead to reduced transportation, assembly, foundation, and maintenance costs.
Installations of the Present Invention can be structured for minimal environmental impact with regard to a selected source of low energy potential. An offshore site for harvesting tidal or wave/surf energy could be selected accordingly. A portion of the water could be diverted from a stream or river to supply the Present Invention and then returned at a point slightly downstream, thus eliminating the need for a full dam structure, which would alter the natural characteristics of the main stream. In addition, the aerating effects inherent in the Present Invention operation would actually enhance water quality in a side stream. Multiple side streams are possible because the modular design of the Present Invention would accommodate multiple installations positioned at varying elevations. Modules could then be connected in parallel to supply vacuum flow as a single unit to a single vacuum motor. Depending upon the source of water supply, and allowing for sufficient upstream elevation, the Present Invention could be installed as a series of aboveground tanks reducing the need for extensive excavation and soil removal.
Basic components of an exemplary embodiment are shown In the
The purpose of the scavenger loop 14 (shown in
The scavenger loop 14 produces the vacuum necessary for removing air or gas accumulations from the crossover header 2. It also operates on the siphon principle using uplift column 17 and downflow column 18, except that the scavenger loop crossover header (see
The system is started by vacuum priming using an external vacuum source 19. All air and/or gases are removed from the system during the priming phase. Once all siphon columns including the scavenger columns have been evacuated and air and/or gas is displaced by flowing liquid in the columns, the vacuum priming source 19 is shut down. A check valve 20 in the vacuum priming line 21 prevents air from back streaming once the vacuum source ceases operation. When the priming phase is complete, and system steady state flow in all columns as been established, energy recovery can then begin.
The energy recovery phase is entered into by opening the vacuum motor startup valve 22 in the flow line 5 between the vacuum motor and the connection to the micro bubble diffuser 7 in the downflow column. With this valve 22 in the open position, air will be drawn through the micro-bubble diffuser(s) 7 into the downflow column(s) 4. The vacuum motor will immediately start once atmospheric air 23 begins passing through.
This Present Application is the non-provisional counterpart of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/084,790 filed on Jul. 30, 2008. Said Provisional Application is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. This Present Application claims the benefit of and priority to said Provisional Application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2401 | Johnson | Dec 1841 | A |
56597 | Naglee | Jul 1866 | A |
298805 | Weeden | May 1884 | A |
378811 | Tyler | Feb 1888 | A |
475396 | Hawley | May 1892 | A |
853705 | Lindenberg et al. | May 1907 | A |
2063002 | Smith | Dec 1936 | A |
3505688 | Sloan | Apr 1970 | A |
3510884 | Sloan | May 1970 | A |
3939523 | Kolbe et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3945211 | Rowe | Mar 1976 | A |
3956124 | Fast et al. | May 1976 | A |
4051204 | Muller et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4110058 | Langle et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4124035 | Rice | Nov 1978 | A |
4132247 | Lindberg | Jan 1979 | A |
4180976 | Bunn | Jan 1980 | A |
4301826 | Beckerer | Nov 1981 | A |
4396842 | Jhun | Aug 1983 | A |
4587435 | McCullough | May 1986 | A |
4617113 | Christophersen et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4624109 | Minovitch | Nov 1986 | A |
4743405 | Durao et al. | May 1988 | A |
4807674 | Sweet | Feb 1989 | A |
5034164 | Semmens | Jul 1991 | A |
5356076 | Bishop | Oct 1994 | A |
5507943 | Labrador | Apr 1996 | A |
5674433 | Semmens et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5970999 | Greenia | Oct 1999 | A |
6239505 | Kao | May 2001 | B1 |
6800115 | Eimer | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6967413 | Atiya | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6984304 | Andrews et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7063247 | Lund et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7537200 | Glassford | May 2009 | B2 |
20050230856 | Parekh et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060144439 | Bell | Jul 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100071780 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 61084790 | Jul 2008 | US |
Child | 12509443 | US |