The present disclosure is directed to a noise attenuation device that has an effective length that may be selectively varied by a vacuum actuator.
Internal combustion engines produce undesirable induction noise within a vehicle. While the induction noise is dependent on the particular engine configuration and other induction system parameters, such noise is caused by a pressure wave that travels toward the inlet of the air induction system. Induction noise is particularly problematic in hybrid vehicles, as changes in ambient noise are particularly noticeable, because engines in hybrid vehicles repeatedly turn on and off. Moreover, hybrids tend to operate a specific engine RPMs that maximize efficiency since the engine speed is not directly related to vehicle speed and can be varied by changing the generator speed (depending on the powertrain architecture).
To address such noise, it is known to utilize exhaust mufflers to reduce engine exhaust noise, as well as smooth exhaust-gas pulsations. Some known mufflers include a series of fixed expansion or resonance chambers of varying lengths, connected together by pipes. With this configuration, the exhaust noise reduction is achieved by the size and shape for the individual fixed expansion chambers. While increasing the number of channels can further reduce exhaust noise, such configurations require additional packaging room within the vehicle, limiting design options for various components. Further, while mufflers traditionally include sound deadening material, such material only dampens sounds over a broad narrow of higher frequencies.
Another proposed solution for addressing undesirable noise is use of a Helmholz resonator or a quarter-wave resonator. These resonators produce a pressure wave that counteracts primary engine order noise waves. Such resonators consist of a fixed volume chamber connected to an induction system duct by a connection or neck. However, such arrangements attenuate noise only at a fixed narrow frequency range.
However, the frequency associated with the primary order of engine noise is different at different operating levels. Thus a fixed geometry resonator would be ineffective in attenuating primary order noise over much of the complete range of engine speeds encountered during normal operation of a vehicle powered by the engine. Moreover, such conventional resonator systems provide an attenuation profile that does not match the profile of the noise and yields unwanted accompanying side band amplification. This is particularly true for a wide band noise peak. The result is that when a peak value is reduced to the noise level target line at a given engine speed, the amplitudes of noise at adjacent speeds are higher than the target line. While multiple resonators could be used to address different frequencies, such a solution requires additional packaging room within a vehicle.
While not as common as the passive devices described above, active noise cancellation systems have also been employed in vehicle exhaust systems. Active noise cancellation systems include one or more vibrating panels (i.e., speakers) that are driven by a microprocessor. The microprocessor monitors the engine operation and/or the acoustic frequencies propagating in the exhaust pipe and activates the panels to generate sound that is out-of-phase with the noise generated by the engine to minimize or cancel engine noise. The principle is similar to that used by noise-canceling headphones. However, active devices have significant drawbacks. Some active devices are positioned within a cab of a vehicle and thus require sufficient packaging room for positioning, while maintaining an aesthetics. Other active devices have been placed in the automotive exhaust systems. However, in these arrangements, the microphones and speakers must be more powerful and capable of withstanding the intense heat and corrosive environment of an automobile exhaust. Furthermore, active devices are often cost-prohibitive for many vehicles.
A noise attenuation device that is capable of variable frequency noise reduction is needed.
In a first exemplary arrangement, a vehicle noise attenuation element is provided that comprises at least two tube sections that define an overall tube length, and a valve having a valve member. The valve joins the tube sections together and includes an opening that permits communication between the tube sections when the valve is in an open configuration. The valve member closes the opening in response to a predetermined vacuum level through the tube sections to define a tube effective length that is less than the overall length.
In a second exemplary arrangement, a noise attenuation element for vehicles is provided that comprises a tube unit defined by a plurality of tube sections, a first valve and a second valve. The tube unit has an overall length that defines a first effective length. The first valve is disposed between first and second tube sections and is defined by a first outer casing, and a first valve member. The first outer casing has at least one first opening that permits communication between the first and second tube sections when the first valve is in an open configuration. The second valve is disposed between the second tube section and a third tube section, and is defined by a second outer casing and a second valve member. The second outer casing has at least one second opening that permits communication between the second and third tube sections when the second valve is in an open configuration. A first vacuum level through the tube unit serves to draw the first valve member against the first openings to move the first valve member into a closed configuration, selectively defining a second effective length of the tube that is less than the first effective length.
An exemplary method of selectively attenuating noise in a vehicle is also disclosed. The method comprises selectively varying an effective length of a quarter-wave tube in response to an engine operating parameter by moving a valve from an open configuration to a closed configuration using a passive actuation system.
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The Figures are not necessarily to scale; some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.
The present disclosure is directed to a noise attenuation element that utilizes quarter-wave tube sections, joined together to form a quarter-wave tube unit for noise attenuation. A first end of the quarter-wave tube unit is open and in fluid communication with an air intake passage or the like, while the second end is generally closed. Typically, the quarter-wave tube unit will attenuate noise at a given frequency range, due to its fixed geometry. However, lengthening or shortening the length of the quarter-wave tube unit can serve to attenuate noise at a lower or higher frequency range, respectively. Arrangements of a quarter-wave tube unit are disclosed herein, including a quarter-wave tube unit that may be selectively designed with a fixed overall length, but also provided with multiple effective lengths by one or more valve arrangements mounted between adjacent tube sections. This configuration provides for a noise attenuation element that can be tuned to several different frequencies, but only requires packaging space within a vehicle for a single resonator.
Referring to
The noise attenuation element 22 comprises a quarter-wave tube unit 24 comprising at least two tube sections 26a, 26b, that may be selectively joined together by a diaphragm valve 28. The quarter-wave tube unit 24 is defined by an open end 25 (shown in
Referring to
In operation, with the engine 10 either not operating, or operating at a low operation condition (for example, idling), the valve 28 is in the open configuration shown in
When the engine 10 operational conditions change, i.e., when engine speed increases, more air and fuel is required. The increase in air flow in the clean side duct, not only will trigger a change in noise frequency levels, it will also increase the vacuum in the system. The valve member 34 is constructed with a predetermined spring factor coefficient so as to be calibrated to close the valve at a certain vacuum point, dependent upon the operational conditions of the engine. Closing the valve 28 will vary the effective length of the quarter wave tube unit 24, without requiring any sensors or a control system.
More specifically, when the engine speed increases to a certain initial threshold level, the vacuum generated by the increase in air flow will cause the valve member 34 in valve 28 to be drawn against an inside surface of the outer casing 30, covering the openings 40, so as to put the valve 28 in a closed configuration as shown in
Referring to
In one exemplary arrangement, noise attenuation device 122 comprises a first valve 128a and a second valve 128b, each having the same construction as valve 28 (i.e., valve member 34, valve cover 32, openings 40). For ease of illustrations, the valve member, valve cover and openings of the first and second valve 128a, 128b will be referred to by the appropriate letter designation. For example, valve member 34a is disposed within the first valve member 128a. The first valve member 34a of the first valve 128a has a first spring factor coefficient K1, and the second valve 128b includes a second valve member 34b having a second spring factor coefficient K2 that is higher than the first spring factor coefficient K1. The noise attenuation device 122 further comprises a plurality of tube sections 126a, 126b, and 126c. First valve 128a joins first and second tube sections 126a and 126b together. Second valve 128b joins second and third tube sections 126b and 126c.
In a fully open position (as shown in
Each of the valve members disposed within the first and second valves 128a, 128b, respectively have different spring factor coefficients. With this arrangement, the valve members of each of the first and second valves 128a, 128b will deflect at different vacuum points. More specifically, the valve member 34a of the first valve 128a has a first spring factor coefficient K1. The valve member 34b of the second valve 128b has a second spring factor coefficient K2 that is greater than the first spring constant K1. With this arrangement, the valve member 34b of the second valve 128b will be positioned away from the openings 40b of the valve casing 30b of the second valve 128b, such that fluid communication is possible between second and third tube sections 126b and 126c, respectively, when the valve member 34a of the first valve 128a is in a closed configuration, i.e., the valve member 34a is drawn against the openings 40a, as shown in
K1<K2
In operation, with the engine 10 either not operating, or operating at a low operational condition (for example, idling), the first and second valves 128a, 128b are both in their open configuration, such that the respective valve members 34a, 34b are not covering the openings 40, of the outer casings 30a, 30b. In this manner, the first effective length QW1 of the quarter-wave tube unit 124 is equal to the overall length of the quarter-wave tube unit 124 (best seen in
Referring to
The above system provides a passive actuation system for selectively adjusting the effective length of the quarter-wave tube unit 124, but without requiring electronic control by the engine. Indeed, the present arrangement packages a single quarter-wave tube unit 124 that is capable of attenuating multiple peak frequencies as opposed to needing to provide multiple quarter-wave tubes engineered for individual peak frequencies. Moreover, the present arrangement also allows for the frequencies of the quarter-wave tube unit to be selectively changed to avoid undesired side bands.
The above system also allows for different tube segments or sections to be utilized, as well as allows for selective adjustment of the addition or subtraction of tube segments. More specifically, the present system is a modular unit that allows different sized tube segments or sections to be selectively paired with valves 128a, 128b for different vehicle models or applications, for example.
Referring to
More specifically, to selectively modify the effective length, at least one aperture 233 (shown in phantom in
Valve members 228a-228b are similar in structure to valve members 28, 128 in that valve members 228a-228b each include an outer casing 30, a valve member 34, valve cover 32, and openings 40 through the outer casing 30. Referring to
For example, when the valve members 228a/228b are in their respective open position, shown in
However, when the valve members are in their respective closed positions, as shown in
The noise attenuation device 122 is represented by line 52 in
The effectiveness of the noise attenuation elements 22 and 122 will now be discussed in reference to the graph in
While exemplary embodiments are described above, it is not intended that these embodiments describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, the features of various implementing embodiments may be combined to form further embodiments of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1173583 | Johnston et al. | Feb 1916 | A |
1375621 | Wright, Jr. | Apr 1921 | A |
1495690 | Hayes | May 1924 | A |
1975483 | Semple | Oct 1934 | A |
2404589 | Monaghan | Jul 1946 | A |
3254484 | John | Jun 1966 | A |
3620330 | Hall | Nov 1971 | A |
3726092 | Raczuk | Apr 1973 | A |
4484659 | Buchwalder | Nov 1984 | A |
4562809 | Sausner et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
5137439 | Lundin | Aug 1992 | A |
5246205 | Gillingham et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5317112 | Lee | May 1994 | A |
5333576 | Verkleeren | Aug 1994 | A |
5435347 | Gillingham | Jul 1995 | A |
6382161 | Alex et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6494290 | Jessberger | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6622486 | Jarvi | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6792907 | Kostun | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6848410 | Hoffmann | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7448353 | Shinada | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7779962 | Zhang | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7934581 | Kim | May 2011 | B2 |
8327975 | Ortman | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8485311 | Mackenzie | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8528692 | Teshima | Sep 2013 | B2 |
9394864 | Arteaga | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9726125 | Arteaga et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20020005318 | Schumacher et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020100281 | Hellat | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20080156579 | Hayashi | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090229913 | Tonietto et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100193282 | Kim | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20140316325 | Jaber | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150361934 | Arteaga | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160230719 | Kato | Aug 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0649982 | Dec 1996 | EP |
02215925 | Aug 1990 | JP |
2006308257 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2004094826 | Nov 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180135573 A1 | May 2018 | US |