This application is a U.S. National Phase application of PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2012/070331, filed Oct. 12, 2012, and claims the benefit of Swedish Application No. SE 1100756-4, filed Oct. 13, 2011, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to vacuum cleaners, and especially to a vacuum cleaner comprising an axial diffuser.
The efficiency of the motor-fan unit is an important factor when it comes to minimize losses in a vacuum cleaner. A part of the fan system where present systems show unnecessary losses is in the air guiding system. Usually, a diffuser is present for deceleration of air ejected from an impeller in a controlled manner, in this way transforming the dynamic pressure created by the impeller into static pressure. Diffusers in vacuum cleaners are either arranged axially or radially. The construction of the diffuser is very important as it affects the efficiency of the vacuum cleaner. A highly efficient diffuser can increase the volume of air being moved or reduces the power required to move the same volume of air. Hence, the desire for a more efficient diffuser is obvious.
In EP 1 878 376 a vacuum cleaner with a radially arranged diffuser is provided. In the known arrangement, the efficiency is increased by changing the inlet angles of the vanes in the diffuser, when combined with changing the return guide vane angles. Radially arranged diffusers result in a vacuum cleaner with large diameter and therefore axially arranged diffusers are preferred when a more compact design is desired. For example in handheld vacuum cleaners where size is an important factor, axial diffusers allow for a design with a smaller outer diameter than radially arranged diffusers.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,442,792 describes a vacuum cleaner with a mixed flow impeller directly connected to an electric motor and with an axial diffuser arranged on the downstream side of the impeller.
A general problem in diffusers is that deceleration of air should be as smooth as possible to minimize losses. By increasing the flow area in the diffuser air channels little by little smooth deceleration is achieved. This is easier to achieve if the air channels are relatively long. A problem when producing diffusers with long channels is that the production tools end up to be very complex. For example, when producing diffusers by injection moulding, the injection moulding tool needs to be extremely complex to produce a diffuser provided with air channels long enough to provide smooth deceleration of air. Another problem arising in long flow channels and in flow channels where the cross sectional area is increased, is boundary layer separation; the air flow will separate from the flow surface it follows, resulting in an increased flow resistance and increased losses. In an arrangement with one diffuser row with relatively long vanes there is a risk that the boundary layers are decelerated and stop thereby creating separation.
Further, for battery operated vacuum cleaners where the available energy usually is limited either by cost and/or space restrictions, there is a need for a compact efficient motor-fan unit with as low losses as possible. Accordingly, there is a need for an improved vacuum cleaner providing both a compact design as well as an efficient fan system with low losses.
An object of the present invention is to provide an improved vacuum cleaner solving at least some of the problems mentioned above.
According to a first aspect of the invention, the object is achieved by a vacuum cleaner comprising an electric motor, an impeller and an axial diffuser arranged on a common axis. The impeller is connected to the electric motor and is arranged for rotation on the common axis to achieve a radial air flow. The radial air flow is redirected into an axial air flow. The diffuser passages are arranged between an inner circumferential wall and an outer circumferential wall. The walls are coaxially arranged around the common axis. Each diffuser passage is delimited in a circumferential direction between the walls by vanes extending between the inner wall and the outer wall in an axial direction extending substantially in parallel with the common axis. The vanes are arranged in at least two rows being consecutively arranged in the axial direction extending substantially in parallel with the common axis.
Since the vanes are arranged in at least two consecutive rows, the flow surface is interrupted. The air stream will follow the interrupted flow surface for a longer distance compared to a non-interrupted surface of the same length since the transition between the rows will promote a stable boundary layer along the vanes of the downstream row. As a result, unwanted separation of the air flow from the flow surface will be avoided and the air flow will be distributed over the whole available cross sectional area of the diffuser passages. Thereby, unnecessary losses are avoided and the losses in the diffuser are thereby limited. The above mentioned object is thereby achieved. In an arrangement with a plurality of consecutive diffuser rows the separation and losses is minimized because new fresh boundary layers are created on the surfaces of the downstream vanes. It has been shown that a plurality of diffuser rows give a higher working efficiency than a single row.
In embodiments the vanes are arranged in more than two consecutive arranged rows. By using further rows, the effect of interrupting the flow surface as described above will be further improved. Further, due to the rows there will be a smooth increase of the cross sectional area of the diffuser passages resulting in smooth deceleration of the air stream.
In embodiments at least two pair of vanes are arranged in the consecutively arranged rows.
In embodiments the first pair of vanes is arranged at a first angle in relation to the common axis, and the second pair of vanes is arranged at a second angle in relation to the common axis. The second angle is smaller than the first angle. Thereby, the passage width between the two vanes comprised in a pair for each consecutive row is increasing, and the cross sectional area of the diffuser passage, and thus the flow area of the air stream flowing in the passage, is increasing in the air flow direction.
In embodiments the vanes comprised in the first pair are arranged substantially in parallel and at a distance from each other.
In embodiments the second pair of vanes is arranged with a displacement in a circumferential direction in relation to the first pair of vanes.
In embodiments the displacement has a length of the distance multiplied with 0.15-0.35.
In embodiments the electric motor is driven by a battery.
In embodiments the vacuum cleaner is of an upright model.
Further features of, and advantages with, the present invention will become apparent when studying the appended claims and the following detailed description. Those skilled in the art will realize that different features of the present invention may be combined to create embodiments other than those described in the following, without departing from the scope of the present invention, as defined by the appended claims.
The various aspects of the invention, including its particular features and advantages, will be readily understood from the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which example embodiments are shown. However, this invention should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Disclosed features of example embodiments may be combined as readily understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
Still further, the second pair of vanes 9c, 9d is arranged with a displacement in a circumferential direction in relation to the first pair of vanes 9a, 9b. Typically, the displacement is chosen to be 0.15-0.35 of the distance A. In addition to the initially mentioned manufacturing advantages, the displacement serves to ensure that a stable flow of air is maintained in a large part of the diffuser passage 6. As described above, a vane 9d upstream of an adjacent vane 9f will guide the air flow over the adjacent vane 9f as well as providing a slot. Through the slot air from an adjacent diffuser passage will pass and promote stable boundary layer along the adjacent vane 9f.
Example embodiments described above may be combined as understood by a person skilled in the art. Although the invention has been described with reference to example embodiments, many different alterations, modifications and the like will become apparent for those skilled in the art. Therefore, it is to be understood that the foregoing is illustrative of various example embodiments and the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications to the disclosed embodiments, combinations of features of disclosed embodiments as well as other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1100756 | Oct 2011 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/070331 | 10/12/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/053920 | 4/18/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2726807 | Lewis | Dec 1955 | A |
3334370 | Boyd | Aug 1967 | A |
3791772 | Keimpema et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
4065233 | Torigoe et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
5152661 | Sheets | Oct 1992 | A |
5401146 | Moriya et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5511942 | Meier | Apr 1996 | A |
6055700 | Holsten et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077032 | Wolfe, Jr. et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6158083 | Holsten | Dec 2000 | A |
6264427 | Berfield | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6358005 | Berfield | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6442792 | Sudou et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6485259 | Berfield | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6659737 | Bader et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6839934 | Houghton et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7025576 | Chaffee | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7942646 | Zhou et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20070122277 | Oh | May 2007 | A1 |
20120186036 | Kegg | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1975175 | Jun 2007 | CN |
1790264 | May 2007 | EP |
1 878 376 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2 316 322 | May 2011 | EP |
59-213994 | Dec 1984 | JP |
06-108999 | Apr 1994 | JP |
11294390 | Oct 1999 | JP |
WO 2004062457 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2012103053 | Aug 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/EP2012/070331 dated Jan. 30, 2013. |
Office Action, with English translation, for Chinese Application No. CN201280050333.4 dated Sep. 6, 2015. |
Translation of Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2014535111, dated Jun. 7, 2016, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140230184 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |