The present invention relates to a vacuum clean-out system and, more particularly, to a vacuum clean-out system including a multi-chamber arrangement for separating waste material from the vacuum stream and isolating the collected waste material from the vacuum flow, providing an uninterrupted vacuum return line free of contaminants.
There are many applications, primarily industrial applications, where a vacuum system is used to hold semiconductor wafers in a fixture, create a controlled environment and/or remove various types of unwanted material. It is preferable to utilize a closed system where the negative pressure is constantly maintained and the removed material is separated out from the return vacuum flow so that the vacuum line returns to operation free from any contaminants which could otherwise cause problems with the vacuum pump.
Many appropriate vacuum systems are well known and used in the art, where such systems may be used in either a “dry” vacuum environment or a “wet” vacuum environment. A common problem with all systems, however, is the need to periodically clean the vacuum removal system to eliminate the particulate matter that has accumulated over time. In systems utilizing a separator as a holding tank for the particulate, the separator itself needs to be periodically cleaned, or the vacuum efficiency will begin to decrease and/or some of the particulate matter will pass through the separator and may re-enter the system.
Such periodic cleaning has previously been done by so-called “backflow” methods where a blast of pressure is directed in a reverse direction to unclog dry separators of any particulate matter. Such a system when used with a dry-type separator causes unnecessary mess due to particles or contaminants being blown out of the device into the environment or into a special receptacle. Such a system will still clog after a period of time and requires a manual teardown and reassembly of the separator to restore the proper vacuum flow through the system. Wet separators also require periodic shutdown of the system to drain and clean the separator and then replenish the separator material.
Thus, it would be desirable to develop a vacuum system that provides automatic, periodic cleaning of the accumulating waste in such a manner that the system does not need to be shut down, manually cleaned and then re-charged.
The need remaining in the art is addressed by the present invention which relates to a vacuum clean-out system and, more particularly, to a vacuum clean-out system including an arrangement for separating waste material from the vacuum stream and isolating the collected waste material from the vacuum flow, providing a vacuum return line of constant pressure and free of contaminants, and permitting the discharge of isolated waste material without interrupting the vacuum flow.
In accordance with the present invention, a vacuum line clean-out system comprises a separator chamber and a collection chamber coupled to the separator chamber, where the collection chamber can be periodically isolated from the separator chamber to discharge accumulated waste material without interrupting the vacuum clean-out process within the separator chamber.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the separator chamber is configured to induce a cyclonic flow within the incoming vacuum waste stream, causing the liquid and debris within the stream to impinge the chamber's surfaces and fall towards the bottom of the chamber, while the “clean” vacuum flow is drawn upwards into a clean vacuum return line. The collection chamber is connected to a drain output of the separator chamber and receives the liquid/debris as it moves downward out of the separator chamber. The collection chamber is also coupled to the vacuum return line to maintain the same negative pressure as the separator chamber, allowing the liquid/debris to easily drain.
A sensor may be used in association with the collection chamber to indicate when then collection chamber needs to be emptied (referred to as a discharge process). Alternatively, the discharge of the collection chamber may be manually controlled, or configured to occur on a periodic basis regardless of the volume of accumulated waste material.
It is an aspect of the present invention that the separator chamber is isolated from the collection chamber during the discharge process, thus allowing for the vacuum clean-out process to continue within the separator chamber during discharge. Any liquid/debris that accumulates during the discharge process will thus collect at the bottom of the separator chamber and be transferred to the collection chamber once the discharge process is completed, the negative pressure is re-established in the collection chamber and the connection between the two chambers is re-opened.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the vacuum return line within the separator chamber may further include a filtering element, pressure reducing orifice, and/or condensing elements to further ensure that any liquid and/or debris within the separator chamber is not permitted to enter the vacuum return line.
Various arrangements for introducing cyclonic flow into the inventive system may be used including, but not limited to, tapered inner walls within the separator chamber itself, or the inclusion of a diverter within the separator chamber for initiating the cyclonic action.
Other and further embodiments and features of the present invention will become apparent during the course of the following discussion and by reference to the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to the drawings,
Referring to
In accordance with the teachings of the present invention, separator chamber 18 is formed to induce a cyclonic vacuum flow to efficiently remove the waste material from the vacuum. In this particular embodiment, separator chamber 18 is formed to include tapered walls, denoted by wall area 20 in
Referring again to
In further accordance with the present invention, a second valve 30 is coupled to apex 22 of separator chamber 18 and is used to control the transfer of the accumulating liquid and debris into a connected collection chamber 32. In operation, second valve 30 will normally remain “opened”, and only “close” when collection chamber 32 is full (determined in various ways, as described below). A third valve 34 is used to connect collection chamber to a vacuum line 36 that is coupled to clean vacuum return line 26 in the manner shown in
In order to prevent the accumulating waste material from overfilling collection chamber 32 and contaminating the return vacuum being drawn through vacuum line 36, a discharge process is periodically used to empty, sample or dose (i.e., solvent, pH adjustment, rinse, etc.) collection chamber 32. It is a significant aspect of the present invention that this discharge process occurs without affecting or needing to shut down the vacuum line clean-out process within separator chamber 18.
Advantageously, the vacuum line clean-out process continues within separator chamber 18 uninterrupted while the discharge process is underway, since the chambers have been isolated and a negative pressure is maintained in separator chamber 18. Therefore, the inventive system may be periodically cleaned or sampled while not requiring the vacuum process itself to be shut down or affected, realizing a significant savings in terms of time and expense.
The discharge process may be manually controlled or provided under the control of a timer (for example, to initiate the discharge process every thirty minutes). Various other procedures for initiating and controlling the discharge process are possible and are considered to fall within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Indeed, as shown in
Additionally, as shown in
It is to be understood that the clean-out and separator system of the present invention may also be utilized in a positive pressure environment instead of the negative pressure (vacuum) environment discussed above. A key aspect of the present invention is the automated, contained and isolated arrangement as shown in
The accumulating liquid/debris thereafter drains into the connected collection chamber 54. As with the embodiment described above, collection chamber 54 is maintained at essentially the same pressure as separator chamber 52 via a vacuum line 66 that is coupled to “clean” vacuum return line 55.
An in-situ sensing element 64 is shown in
Again, system 50 may be configured in a manner similar to the previously-described embodiment, including the use of manual controls in place of in-situ sensing element 64. Alternatively, a periodic discharge system may be employed that automatically drains the collected material in periodic time intervals. Regardless of the specific arrangement used to initiate the discharge procedure, it is a significant aspect of the present invention that the collection chamber is isolated from the separator chamber during discharge to allow for the vacuum line clean-out process to continue uninterrupted.
While the invention has been described with regard to the preferred embodiments, it is to be understood by those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited thereof, and that changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/849,896, filed Oct. 7, 2006.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3318075 | Wilson | May 1967 | A |
| 3842461 | Wurster | Oct 1974 | A |
| 4201256 | Truhan | May 1980 | A |
| 4227893 | Shaddock | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4564374 | Hofmann | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4574420 | Dupre | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4670139 | Spruiell et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4800612 | Valentine | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4820315 | DeMarco | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4963172 | DeMarco | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5030259 | Bryant et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5034038 | Olson | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5062868 | Kennedy | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5062870 | Dyson | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5125125 | Barsacq | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5147610 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5277705 | Anderson et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5403473 | Moorehead et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5492407 | Gement | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5916010 | Varian et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5922093 | James et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6004196 | Doan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6045618 | Raoux et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6190236 | Drill | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6217430 | Koga et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6237186 | Griffiths | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6244944 | Elledge | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6276452 | Davis et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6287174 | Detzel et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6331136 | Bass et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6354241 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6358124 | Koga et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6409803 | Tremel et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6440317 | Koethe | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6558238 | Crevasse et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6562109 | Livingston et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6716261 | Carroll et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6818033 | North | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6833016 | Witter | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6837942 | Joslyn | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6887290 | Strauser et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6916236 | Terpstra | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6936085 | DeMarco | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6945855 | Moore et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 7004820 | Teng et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7014670 | Shutic et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7025663 | Kim | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7052599 | Osuda et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7063603 | Moore et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| RE39195 | Doan et al. | Jul 2006 | E |
| RE40048 | Witter | Feb 2008 | E |
| 7343643 | Kondo | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 20030010708 | Leocavallo et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030159412 | North | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040006953 | Carroll et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040055470 | Strauser et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103785 | North | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040188340 | Appel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20080092734 | Benner | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080092734 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60849896 | Oct 2006 | US |