The present invention generally relates to vacuum packaging. More particularly, the invention is directed to intelligent and variable speed control of a vacuum pump, intelligent vacuum pump controllers, and intelligent vacuum packaging appliances, as well as vacuum feedback.
Vacuum packaging involves removing air or other gases from a storage container and then sealing the container to prevent the contents from being exposed to the air. Vacuum packaging is particularly useful in protecting food and other perishables against oxidation. Oxygen is a main cause of food spoilage and contributes to the growth of bacteria, mold, and yeast. Accordingly, vacuum packaged food often lasts three to five times longer than food stored in ordinary containers. Moreover, vacuum packaging is useful for storing clothes, photographs, silver, and other items to prevent discoloration, corrosion, rust, and tarnishing. Furthermore, vacuum packaging produces tight, strong, and compact packages to reduce the bulk of articles and allow for more space to store other supplies.
In the closed position of
Conventional vacuum packaging bags include two panels attached together with an open end. Typically, the panels each include two or more layers. The inner layer can be a heat sealable material, and the outer layer can be a gas impermeable material to provide a barrier against the influx of air. The plasticity temperature of the inner layer is lower than the outer layer. Accordingly, the bag can be heated to thermally bond the inner layer of each panel together to seal the bag without melting or puncturing the outer layer during the heat sealing cycle.
A conventional vacuum packaging process includes depositing the object 79 into the bag 70 and positioning an open end 71 of the bag 70 proximate to the lower trough 84 of the vacuum packaging appliance 80. Next, the hood 90 pivots downward to form the vacuum chamber around the open end 71 of the bag 70. The vacuum pump then removes gas from the vacuum chamber and the interior of the bag 70, which is in fluid communication with the vacuum chamber. After the gas has been removed from the interior of the bag 70, the heating element 88 heats a strip of the bag 70 proximate to the open end 71 to melt the inner layer of each panel and thermally seal the bag 70.
A step 14 hermetically closes the vacuum circuit. For example, step 14 may correspond to closing the hood 90 as described above. Step 14 insures that evacuation of the storage receptacle will result eventually in the storage receptacle reaching a gas pressure that is sufficiently near absolute vacuum to accomplish the intended purpose.
A step 16 actuates the vacuum pump at a constant evacuation speed fixed by the control circuitry of the vacuum packaging appliance. Step 16 is accomplished manually by a user actuating a control switch. This control switch may be attached to a button made available to the user, or may be formed into the vacuum packaging appliance such that when the vacuum circuit is hermetically sealed, the control switch actuates. The vacuum pump operates at the constant predefined evacuation speed until the user turns the machine off, or in some instances a vacuum sensor is placed in the vacuum circuit and the vacuum pump is turned off when the vacuum of the vacuum circuit reaches a certain predefined level.
The prior art teaches a single, constant speed vacuum pump. During the initial phase, the vacuum pump is not taxed, however during the critical phase and the final phase, the vacuum pump can be taxed. The vacuum speed of the prior art must be selected such that the pump motor operates safely during all phases of evacuation. A desirable feature to most users of the vacuum packaging appliance is to evacuate the bag as fast as possible. Thus the prior art teaches setting the vacuum pump evacuation speed as fast as will safely operate during the critical and final phases.
Unfortunately, this single, high-speed approach is not well suited for fragile contents in collapsible bags, as the user cannot stop the vacuum in time. Additionally, there are periods of evacuation when the vacuum pump could be run at higher rates without causing damage to the vacuum pump. This means the prior art teaching does not optimize evacuation speed.
Another problem with conventional vacuum packaging appliances is the lack of vacuum level feedback information provided to the user. During evacuation the user has no knowledge of the vacuum level at any given point in time. As a result, the user has to make a visual determination when to turn off the machine or rely on the machine's predefined vacuum level to automatically stop the vacuum pump. A lack of user interaction may result in damaging fragile contents and in some instances, may result in incomplete evacuation due to the storage receptacle.
The capability to sense various vacuum levels with user feedback would be particularly useful when the content in a collapsible storage receptacle is fragile. For example, when storing fragile items a user may want to deactivate the vacuum pump during the critical phase to avoid damaging the fragile contents. In other circumstances, the user may choose to prolong evacuation until the vacuum level reaches the final phase 58 to prevent incomplete evacuation. This functionality is not accomplished by the prior art.
Accordingly, there is a need for user feedback information regarding vacuum levels during evacuation to facilitate user interaction with the vacuum packaging appliance. Additionally, there is a need for more sophisticated vacuum sensing and vacuum pump control.
PRIOR ART
PRIOR ART
PRIOR ART
The invention is directed to methods providing intelligent and variable speed control of a vacuum pump, intelligent vacuum pump controllers, and intelligent vacuum packaging appliances.
A first step 102 involves coupling a vacuum storage receptacle to the vacuum circuit. The present invention contemplates a wide variety of suitable vacuum storage receptacles including heat sealable bag-like receptacles and hard walled canisters. Vacuum storage receptacles, and their interface with different types of vacuum packaging appliances will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. A step 104 closes the vacuum circuit so that the vacuum storage receptacle and the vacuum circuit are substantially hermetically sealed.
A step 106 determines a vacuum mode operation. The present invention contemplates a wide range of possible operation modes. The mode may be a function of a user selection or input, as a function of one or more sensed parameters such as vacuum level, fluid level, temperature of heat sealing element, etc., or a function of both user selection and sensed parameters. A step 108 operates the vacuum packaging appliance in the operation mode determined in step 106. The operation step 108 is performed in an intelligent manner, based on the determined mode and in certain embodiments based on continued monitoring of one or more parameters, user input, etc.
A step 110 provides the user feedback regarding operation of the vacuum pump. For example, the vacuum packaging appliance may be equipped with several lights which could indicate messages such as selected or determined operation mode, status of vacuum pump, status of vacuum level, and status of heat sealing operation. Of course, step 110 is an optional step.
Turning directly to
A step 154 determines whether the vacuum level of the vacuum circuit has reached the critical phase. When the vacuum level is still in the initial phase, control is passed back to step 150 and operation of the vacuum pump is continued in the overdrive state.
When step 154 determines that the vacuum circuit vacuum level has entered the critical phase, control passes to a step 156 that transitions the vacuum pump operation to a safe operating or slow operating speed. The safe operating speed corresponds to a safe mode of operation intended for shorter evacuation periods that tend not to place undue stress on the vacuum pump. This is accomplished by decreasing the vacuum pump speed to a speed safe for operation during the critical and final phases. The slow speed corresponds to a fragile content mode of operation, and increases the time length of the critical phase such that the user has enough time to intervene and disable the vacuum pump should the integrity of the contents be threatened by the force of the collapsing receptacle.
A next step 158 again determines the vacuum level of the vacuum circuit. A step 160 determines whether the vacuum level of the vacuum circuit has reached the final phase. When the vacuum level is still in the critical phase, control passes to a step 162 that determines whether the user has requested that the vacuum pump cease operation. When the user has requested termination, control passes to a step 164, which stops operation of the vacuum pump. Then a step 166 finishes the process by hermetically sealing the vacuum packaging receptacle and disconnecting the vacuum packaging receptacle from the vacuum circuit. Likewise, when step 160 determines that the vacuum circuit has reached the final phase, control is passed to the stop vacuum step 164 and then to the final step 166.
A step 200 monitors user input to determine whether the user has requested activation of the vacuum pump. The present invention contemplates a variety of mechanisms providing a control interface to the user. For example, the vacuum packaging appliance may be equipped with a single on/off switch. This switch may directly activate the vacuum pump, or may be fed as input into a controller such as an electronic control circuit, an ASIC, a PLD, a microprocessor or microcontroller that in turn controls the vacuum pump. The control may operate such that momentary switch actuation toggles the vacuum pump on and off; e.g., push once to begin evacuation, push again to stop evacuation. Alternatively, the control may require the user to continue actuation to maintain vacuum pump activation; e.g., push and hold down to begin evacuation, release button to stop evacuation. The user may also be provided multiple speed control.
Once the user requests a specific pump activation, a step 202 actuates the vacuum pump as requested by the user. A step 204 monitors the vacuum level and when it reaches the final phase, the method 108.2 is completed. If the vacuum level has not reached the final phase, control returns back to pump activation step 200. Step 204 is optional, and certain embodiments will rely on the user to deactivate the vacuum pump.
Of course, the modes of operation can take on many embodiments, and the descriptions herein are merely intended to be illustrative. Certain embodiments may allow the user to select a period of evacuation, which is a multiple of the pulse length by making multiple requests (e.g., pushing pulse button multiple times). Step 252 can be optional, allowing the user to continue evacuating (e.g., running the pump motor) regardless of the vacuum level. Additionally, feedback such as a blinking light may be provided when the vacuum level reaches or approaches a desired point. Still further, evacuation may terminate upon sealing of the bag through manual or automatic operation the heat sealing element.
The vacuum controller 402 is responsive to input from the user i/o 404, the vacuum sensor 406, and the other i/o 410 to control operation of the vacuum pump 408. The vacuum controller 402 may be an independent device, or may be a part of a system controlling all functions of the vacuum packaging appliance 400. The vacuum controller 402 may take the form of a microprocessor, a microcontroller, an ASIC, a PLD, an electronic circuit, or any other suitable form.
The user i/o 404 may include any suitable user interface. For example, the user i/o 404 may include one or more button actuated switches, a keypad and screen, a touchscreen, etc. The user i/o 404 enables the user to select modes of operation for the vacuum packaging appliance 400 related to vacuum pump and in certain embodiments other operations of the vacuum packaging appliance 400. The vacuum sensor 406 is disposed within the vacuum circuit and is operable to sense a vacuum level of the vacuum circuit. In certain embodiments, the vacuum sensor 406 can provide vacuum level data along a continuous scale. In other embodiments the vacuum sensor 406 provides a discrete output indicating transition from one vacuum phase to another, or perhaps several discrete outputs.
The vacuum pump 408 is coupled to the vacuum circuit and is operable to evacuate gas from the vacuum circuit when actuated by the vacuum controller 402. Other i/o 410 may include a temperature sensor coupled to a heat sealing mechanism of the vacuum packaging appliance 400.
Vacuum packaging appliances having vacuum sensors with mechanical user feedback devices will now be described with reference to
The vacuum packaging appliance 500 includes a vacuum circuit made up of a vacuum chamber with a sealing strip, a vacuum pump, a vacuum hose 506 operationally connecting the vacuum pump through a first valve 508 to the vacuum chamber through a second valve 510, and a vacuum sensing module 512. To get the configuration of
A vacuum sensor 530 is shown in
The vacuum packaging appliance 500 as shown in
The vacuum sensor measures the flow rate of the vacuum level of the vacuum circuit. The controller analyzes the flow rate information from the vacuum sensor, determines the current vacuum level, and sends an electronic signal to turn on the LED that corresponds to the current vacuum level. For example, when the vacuum circuit is in the initial steady vacuum level, the controller sends a signal to turn on the LED 632 corresponding to “start.” When the vacuum level is in the critical phase, the controller turns on the LED 634 corresponding to “critical.” LED 636 corresponding to “stop” is illuminated when evacuation reached a final vacuum level.
In another embodiment depicted in
The vacuum sensor measures the flow rate of the vacuum level of the vacuum circuit. The controller analyzes the flow rate information from the vacuum sensor, determines the current vacuum level, and sends an electronic signal to the LCD to display the current vacuum level information to the user. For example, when the vacuum circuit is in the initial steady vacuum level, the controller sends a signal to the LCD to display a message indicative of the initial vacuum level. When the vacuum level is in the critical phase, the controller sends a signal to the LCD to display feedback information to the user indicating that the vacuum level is in the critical phase.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.
The present application claims priority to Higer's U.S. provisional patent application 60/490,842, filed Jul. 29, 2003, and entitled VACUUM PUMP CONTROL, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1143579 | Denhard | Jun 1915 | A |
2079069 | Johnson | May 1937 | A |
2319011 | Meredith | May 1943 | A |
2354423 | Rosenberger | Jul 1944 | A |
2421149 | Hard et al. | May 1947 | A |
2568226 | Drake | Sep 1951 | A |
2617304 | Conover | Nov 1952 | A |
2749686 | Lorenz et al. | Jun 1956 | A |
2778171 | Taunton | Jan 1957 | A |
2899786 | Harker | Aug 1959 | A |
3038283 | Unger | Jun 1962 | A |
3148269 | Van Hartesveldt et al. | Sep 1964 | A |
3464256 | Lloyd | Sep 1969 | A |
3516223 | Andersen et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3688463 | Titchenal | Sep 1972 | A |
3699742 | Giraudi | Oct 1972 | A |
3928938 | Burrell | Dec 1975 | A |
3962847 | Trudel | Jun 1976 | A |
3965646 | Hawkins | Jun 1976 | A |
4006329 | Hellman et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4008601 | Woods | Feb 1977 | A |
4105491 | Haase et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4164111 | Di Bernardo | Aug 1979 | A |
4208902 | Kim et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4330975 | Kakiuchi | May 1982 | A |
4372096 | Baum | Feb 1983 | A |
4541224 | Mugnai | Sep 1985 | A |
4545177 | Day | Oct 1985 | A |
4549387 | Marshall et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4561925 | Skerjanec et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4578928 | Andre et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4581764 | Plock et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4631512 | Hishiki et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4641482 | Metz | Feb 1987 | A |
4928829 | Di Bernardo | May 1990 | A |
4941310 | Kristen | Jul 1990 | A |
5048269 | Deni | Sep 1991 | A |
5352323 | Chi | Oct 1994 | A |
5461901 | Ottestad | Oct 1995 | A |
5481852 | Mitchell | Jan 1996 | A |
5528880 | Landolt | Jun 1996 | A |
5551213 | Koelsch et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5608167 | Hale et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5655357 | Kristen | Aug 1997 | A |
D389847 | Huang | Jan 1998 | S |
5712553 | Hallberg | Jan 1998 | A |
5765608 | Kristen | Jun 1998 | A |
5784862 | Germano | Jul 1998 | A |
5825974 | Hutton | Oct 1998 | A |
5893822 | Deni | Apr 1999 | A |
6058998 | Kristen | May 2000 | A |
6106449 | Wynne | Aug 2000 | A |
6124558 | Baumeister et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6256968 | Kristen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6328897 | Leung | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6467242 | Huang | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6520071 | Lanza | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6623413 | Wynne | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6694710 | Wang | Feb 2004 | B1 |
20040139701 | Cady et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0723915 | Jul 1996 | EP |
1053945 | Nov 2000 | EP |
05-10211 | Feb 1993 | JP |
2000-43818 | Feb 2000 | JP |
WO0071422 | Nov 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050022471 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60490842 | Jul 2003 | US |