Patent Application
20090035157
The subject patent application is claiming a priority of European Patent Application No. 07425484.8 filed in the European Patent Office on Jul. 30, 2007.
The present invention relates to a safety device for a vacuum pump. More particularly, the present invention relates to a safety device intended for use against overpressures that could damage a vacuum pump.
The safety device according to the subject invention can be incorporated in vacuum pumps of any kind. It is especially useful in vacuum pumps that discharge the pumped gas directly at atmospheric pressure, i.e. substantially without the need for a forepump. More particularly, the safety device can be advantageously applied to oil rotary vacuum pumps, which are generally used to attain low vacuum conditions in a pressure range from atmospheric pressure down to a pressure of about 10−1 Pa.
Contemporary oil rotary vacuum pump 10 as shown in
Gas is sucked through suction port 20 passing through a suction duct 28 into chamber 16 where it is pushed and thus compressed by vanes 22, and then is exhausted through an exhaust duct 30 ending at a corresponding exhaust port 32.
A proper amount of oil is introduced into external casing 12 through port 34 of a supply duct provided. The port 34 is then sealed by a cap 36 so that the second internal casing 14 is immersed in an oil bath 38, which acts as coolant and lubricating fluid. In these types of pumps, some oil passes from bath 38 into chamber 16 and forms a thin film that ensures tightness between vanes 22 of rotor 18 and the wall of chamber 16. Examples of oil rotary pumps are disclosed in documents U.S. Pat. No. 6,019,585 and G.B. Patent No. 2151091.
A drawback of prior art oil rotary pumps is substantial when an overpressure is generated inside the pump and, no emergency system is provided to reduce and manage such overpressure. In this situation the oil rotary pump can be severely damaged.
By the way of example, it can be assumed that a clumsy user accidentally connects suction port 26 of vacuum pump 10 to the high pressure side (e.g. the outside environment) and exhaust port 32 of said vacuum pump 10 to the low pressure side (e.g. a vacuum chamber). Due to such inversion of suction and exhaust, vacuum pump 10 sucks air at atmospheric pressure from the outside environment and discharges it into a hermetically sealed space. A quick pressure increase inside the vacuum pump in the absence of an emergency system for reducing such pressure causes severe damages to the vacuum pump. Due to the wide surface offered by the walls of the pump casing relative to the outside environment, which typically is at atmospheric pressure, the force resulting from too high pressure can directly lead to the complete structural collapse of the casing itself.
It is an object of the present invention to prevent the occurrence of accidents of the kind described above by providing a safety device preventing the increase of pressure above a predetermined safety threshold inside a vacuum pump casing. This and other objects are achieved by means of a safety device according to the invention, as claimed in the appended claims.
Due to the safety device disposed at the port of a duct connecting the interior of the vacuum pump casing to the outside environment, which is equipped with a breakable member, which breaks in the presence of a pressure equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold, the accidents and damages to the pump itself are prevented, when the threshold has been properly chosen.
Advantageously, the threshold is chosen low enough to be sensibly lower than the pressure value at which the vacuum pump components would be damaged, so that the breakable member breaks before the pump can undergo any permanent damage.
Also advantageously, this threshold is high enough to be sensibly higher than the pressure values existing inside the vacuum pump during storage, transportation, installation and normal operation; therefore the safety device can be directly mounted during vacuum pump manufacturing without the risk that during the subsequent operations the breakable member breaks too early when no actual risk exists for the pump.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the safety device is used to shut already existing port of a duct, which port is different from the suction or exhaust ports. In particular, for oil rotary vacuum pumps, the safety device is used to close the port of the supply duct of the oil reservoir and it replaces the conventionally used cap.
Advantageously, according to that preferred embodiment of the invention, the safety device can be embodied into already existing vacuum pump system without need for structural modifications.
According to yet another embodiment, the safety device can be mounted on the port of a duct so as to prevent inadvertent tampering of the safety device during normal operation or normal maintenance of the pump when filling the oil reservoir.
A preferred embodiment of the invention, given by way of non limiting example, will now be described in more detail below, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to
For the oil rotary vacuum pumps of the kind shown in
According to an alternative embodiment, the vacuum pump can comprise a second duct, specially provided, which puts the interior of the vacuum pump casing in communication with the outside environment, with the safety device which is coupled to the port of this second duct.
Body 1 of the safety device further has an axial through-hole 1c forming a channel establishing communication between the interior of a vacuum pump casing, e.g. the outer casing in the oil rotary vacuum pump, and the outside environment.
By the way of example, if the safety device replaces cap 36 of the oil reservoir in the oil rotary vacuum pump, stem 1b and head 1a of the body will have a diameter of 22 to 30 mm and 30 to 40 mm, respectively, whereas axial hole 1c will have a diameter of 12 to 17 mm.
The axial through-hole 1c is closed by a breakable member 3, which is received in a first circumferential seat 1d formed on body 1 and which breaks when it is subjected to a pressure equals to or higher than a predetermined threshold pbreak.
Advantageously, once a limit maximum pressure pmax, corresponding to the minimum pressure at which the components of the oil rotary vacuum pump become damaged, has been determined, the material, the size and the structure of breakable member 3 are chosen so that pbreak<pmax.
Moreover, once determined the maximum pressure, pmin to which the components of the oil rotary vacuum pump are subjected during the usual phases of storage, transportation (in particular air transportation), installation and normal operation of the vacuum pump, the material, the size and the structure of breakable member 3 are chosen so that pbreak>pmin.
As a result, pressure threshold pbreak at which breakable member 3 breaks is determined within a pressure range that not only prevents the occurrence of accidents damaging the vacuum pump structure, and but also prevents the accidental breakage of the breakable member during normal life of the pump.
By way of example, in case of application to known oil rotary vacuum pumps, taking into account the components, the structure and the operating specifications of these pumps, the pressure range will generally be from pmin=1.5 bars (0.15 Mpa) to pmax=3.0 bars (0.3 Mpa). In particular the value of pbreak is advantageously set to about 2.0 bars (0.2 Mpa).
Still referring to
As clearly shown in
The above description clearly shows that, during normal operation of the vacuum pump, when pressure inside the casing of said pump is lower than pmin, and consequently also lower than pbreak, breakable member 3 of the safety device keeps unbroken, thus ensuring vacuum tightness. If, because of a mounting error or a failure, pressure inside the pump casing increases up to threshold pbreak, breakable member 3 of the safety device breaks, thereby putting the interior of the vacuum pump casing in communication with the outside environment through hole 1c and thus allowing the accumulated overpressure to be discharged to the outside before the pressure inside the pump casing reaches critical value pmax.
Body 1 of the safety device can be made of plastics, e.g. a polyamide-based polymer, or other types of materials can also be used. Body 1 as well as spacer ring 7 and “Seeger” retaining ring 5 are preferably to maintain their structural integrity at pressures lower than or equal to pbreak. Otherwise stated, breakable member 3 must break first, at a pressure at which the structural integrity of the other components of the safety device is ensured.
Referring to
The first circumferential portion 3a preferably has a thickness in the range 1.5 to 2.0 mm and is intended to ensure vacuum tightness once membrane 3 is placed in its seat 1d and is locked in said seat by “Seeger” retaining ring 5 (see
Central portion 3c that, when membrane 3 is placed in its seat 1d, is substantially aligned with axial through-hole 1c of body 1, is thinner than the rest of membrane 3 and forms therefore the membrane part that first fails when pressure increases. Otherwise stated, the structure, and more particularly the thickness, of central portion 3c of membrane 3 determines the pressure at which the membrane will lose its integrity, and consequently, the structure and the thickness of central portion 3c of membrane 3 will be chosen so that the central portion 3c breaks at a pressure of about pbreak.
Considering the components, the structure and the operating specifications of known oil rotary vacuum pumps, central portion 3c of membrane 3 will have a thickness in the range 0.01 to 0.2 mm and preferably a thickness of about 0.1 mm.
Peripheral portion 3b of membrane 3 has instead of thickness of some tenths of millimetre (e.g. 0.5 mm) and merely serves to connect sealing circumferential portion 3a and breakable central portion 3c.
Still considering the application to oil rotary vacuum pumps, membrane 3 will have in the whole a diameter in the range 22 to 30 mm and central portion 3c of said membrane 3 preferably will have a diameter in the range 12 to 17 mm. In this respect it is to be appreciated that, in the preferred embodiment described above, membrane 3 not only acts as the breakable member of the safety device, but also ensures vacuum tightness.
Yet, it is possible to envisage that the breakable member of the safety device does not simultaneously provide also the vacuum tightness function and that it is associated with a separate member providing for such a function. In such case, it is possible to use a thinner membrane, even of substantially uniform thickness, associated with a conventional O-ring gasket, so that the functions of safety breakage in case of failure and of vacuum tightness during normal operation are decoupled.
In the illustrated embodiment breakable member 3 is made of polymeric material, however other materials could also be employed, such as metals (e.g. aluminium), plastic materials or amorphous materials (e.g. glass). Clearly, the thickness chosen for the breakable member will change depending on the chosen material. The thickness chosen for the breakable member will also change depending on the area of the breakable member, since the force to which it will be subjected during operation is the product of the pressure by the surface onto which said pressure is applied. Moreover, a breakable member integrally made with body 1 of the safety device could even be employed.
The above description clearly shows that the safety device according to the invention attains the intended aim. It is further clear that several other changes and modifications to the embodiment described and illustrated here are possible without departing from the scope of the present invention.
In particular, even if application to oil rotary vacuum pumps has been often referred to, the safety device according to the invention is not only applicable to the kind of pumps. On the contrary, given a vacuum pump having at least one casing, a first port for the inlet of a gas, a second port for the outlet of said gas and one or more pumping stages for pumping gas from the first port to the second port, the safety device according to the invention could be associated with a port of any duct that, in the vacuum pump, is capable of putting the interior of the casing of the pump in communication with the outside environment.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07425484.8 | Jul 2007 | EP | regional |
