This invention relates to waste disposal and more particularly, but not necessarily exclusively, to vacuum toilet assemblies preferably used in vehicles such as airplanes.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,401,270 to Moore, incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference, discloses a conventional hydraulic toilet in which positive pressure is used to facilitate discharging waste from a toilet pan or bowl. A closeable lid may be sealed to the bowl to define a chamber, with an air displacement unit connected to the chamber utilized to increase air pressure therein. The toilet of the Moore patent is not a vacuum type, however, and the Moore patent neither contemplates nor suggests means for reducing noise associated with operation of the toilet.
Unlike the Moore patent, U.S. Pat. No. to Olin, et al. (also incorporated herein in its entirety by reference) does detail a vacuum-type toilet. According to the Olin patent, operational noise of the toilet may be diminished through use of “a lid forming a substantially airtight and soundproof closure at the top of the bowl.” See Olin, Abstract, 11. 15-17. Air may be supplied to the toilet bowl via a tube or pipe entering at the back thereof if closing the lid results in too little air being present in the bowl for efficient flushing of waste. The Olin patent does not, however, address reducing water consumption in such a toilet design.
The present invention is intended to reduce both operational noise and water usage of a vacuum-type toilet while continuing to promote effective disposal of waste. It also allows for the amount of air per flush to be regulated compared to conventional vacuum toilets. In passenger aircraft, for example, reducing the amount of air required for toilet operation commensurately reduces the amount of cabin air necessarily replaced following use of the toilet. Because air has tendency to dry waste, using less air may also promote overall waste-system hygiene by reducing build-up of solids in waste-disposal piping.
Included as components of a toilet assembly of the present invention are a bowl having a rim and a shroud to which a lid is fitted. When closed, the lid is designed to seal against the upper surface of the shroud. Magnetic switches or other suitable means communicating with the flush mechanism may be used to ensure the lid is closed before the toilet is flushed.
Defined along the interior of the rim of the bowl may be a distribution “ring” at or through which both water and air may enter. Although preferably entering through separate openings in the distribution ring, the water and air combine upon entry into the bowl and are pulled through the bowl by evacuation thereof. Airflow pattern down the bowl face generates an “air knife” effect, which accelerates the water, in turn more efficiently removing waste from the bowl. This effect additionally reduces the overall amount of water needed to rinse the bowl effectively. In one presently-preferred embodiment, for example, only two and one half to three ounces of water may be needed for effective flushing.
Further, closing the lid and sealing it against the shroud reduces the amount of air entering the waste system via the bowl. Together with having air enter via the distribution ring under the shroud of the bowl, this sealing greatly reduces the noise associated with flushing the toilet. In a preferred embodiment, noise levels of less than eighty-four decibels have been achieved. For vehicle-mounted toilets, closing and sealing the lid also prevents flushing noise from reflecting off internal panels of the associated lavatory and escaping through door vents so as to disturb other passengers.
It thus is an optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide improved vacuum-toilet assemblies.
It is another optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide vacuum toilets which reduce air flow into the toilet bowl, require less water for effective flushing, and diminish the overall noise volume associated with flushing the toilets.
It is also an optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide toilets in which lids seal with shrouds prior to flushing.
It is a further optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide vacuum toilets having a distribution ring located along the rims of the bowls under the shrouds.
It is, moreover, an optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide vacuum toilets in which both air and water enter the bowls via the distribution rings.
It is yet another optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide vacuum toilets in which evacuation of the bowls produces an air-knife effect.
Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the relevant field with reference to the remaining text and drawings of this application.
Illustrated in
Assembly 10 may include some or all of the valves, ducts, and other components described in the Olin patent. Beneficially, however, bowl 14 defines distribution ring 34, preferably located within the bowl 14 at rim 30. Both water and air may enter bowl 14 at ring 34, promoting good mixing of the water and air upon entry into the bowl 14.
Water may be supplied to bowl 14 in conventional ways, including via a pipe designed to discharge the water along ring 34. Air preferably enters bowl 14 through at least one (and beneficially multiple) openings 38 through the wall of bowl 14 at rim 30. Such openings 38 are below the level of shroud 26, thereby limiting the amount of air available to them. Openings 38 are, however, at approximately the level of the water entering bowl 14, allowing immediate mixing of the water and air at a point well above bottom section 42 of the bowl 14.
Either or both of lid 22 and shroud 26 may include sealing material such as gasket 46. Although any suitable sealing material or mechanism may be employed, gasket 46 functions to create an air-impervious seal between lid 22 and shroud 26 and prevent air from above shroud 26 entering bowl 14 through main waste-receiving opening 50 when the lid 22 is closed (as shown in
When assembly 10 is flushed, water and air enter bowl 14 at distribution ring 34, are mixed, and are pulled toward bottom section 42 as bowl 14 evacuates. Air flow patterns across the interior face of bowl 14 generate an “air knife” effect, accelerating the flow of the water. Increased force applied to the water provides a more efficient way of removing waste within bowl 14. This effect also reduces the overall amount of water needed to rinse bowl 14 effectively. Indeed, some embodiments of assembly 10 require only approximately two and one half to three ounces of water to flush satisfactorily, significantly less water than used by vacuum toilets currently employed on aircraft.
Because lid 22 is closed during flushing of assembly 10, the amount of air pulled through bowl 14 during the flush may be regulated (depending on the number and size of openings 38). Further, because lid 22 is closed and air is pulled from areas below shroud 26, the noise associated with the flush is substantially reduced. Although lid 22 is likely subjected to greater pressure than ambient (e.g. than aircraft cabin pressure) when assembly 10 is flushed, such pressure differential is only approximately two to four inches of mercury, within the stress capabilities of existing lids.
The foregoing is provided for purposes of illustrating, explaining, and describing exemplary embodiments and certain benefits of the present invention. Modifications and adaptations to the illustrated and described embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the relevant art and may be made without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3590397 | Akamatsu et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3996628 | Mollerstedt | Dec 1976 | A |
4232409 | Van Pham | Nov 1980 | A |
4275470 | Badger et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4276663 | Gensurowsky | Jul 1981 | A |
4306321 | Norlin | Dec 1981 | A |
4376314 | Iwans | Mar 1983 | A |
4439874 | Schrock | Apr 1984 | A |
4510629 | Jovy et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
RE32750 | Grills et al. | Sep 1988 | E |
4882792 | Vincent | Nov 1989 | A |
4905325 | Colditz | Mar 1990 | A |
4928326 | Olin et al. | May 1990 | A |
5007117 | Oldfelt et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5035011 | Rozenblatt et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5035140 | Daniels et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5067181 | Hafner et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5123124 | Brower | Jun 1992 | A |
5232010 | Rozenblatt et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5282281 | Clear et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5421040 | Oldfelt | Jun 1995 | A |
5426794 | Hennessy | Jun 1995 | A |
5454936 | Ask et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5515555 | Wormcke | May 1996 | A |
5524655 | Powers et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5692250 | Oldfelt et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5832546 | Inch | Nov 1998 | A |
6006373 | Hoang | Dec 1999 | A |
6085366 | Pondelick et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6143185 | Tracy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6223361 | Rozenblatt | May 2001 | B1 |
6226807 | Rozenblatt et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6330725 | Karlsson et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6385789 | Pondelick et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401270 | Moore | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6434759 | Pondelick et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6510564 | Karlsson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6640701 | Hoehne et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6702942 | Nield | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6977005 | Erdmann et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7533426 | Pondelick | May 2009 | B2 |
20020112281 | Erdmann et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133869 | Pondelick et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020144337 | Go | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20070102370 | Hoffjann et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070151020 | Pondelick | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0363012 | Apr 1990 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060288472 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |