Patent Grant
9073239
The invention relates to engineered stone slabs, also known as Breton stone slabs or Quartz slab, and more particularly, to apparatus for fabricating engineered stone slabs.
Engineered stone slabs are a specialized, non-porous, high performance type of composite stone slab that emulates both the physical and visual properties of natural stone slabs. The term “composite stone” is very broad, and can be applied to any material that is formed by adhering stone particles together. The most common forms of composite stone, such as asphalt, normal cement, or polymer cement, are not intended to emulate natural stone, and do not even remotely approximate the physical properties or appearance of natural stone slabs.
Engineered stone slabs, on the other hand, are a very specialized sub-category of composite stone slab which, until the present invention, were fabricated exclusively using a specialized and highly expensive type of vacuum vibration press invented by M. Toncelli of Breton S.p.A, and marketed by Breton since the 1980's. More recently, copies of the Breton design have been manufactured and sold by other sources, but the Breton design remained the only design that could produce engineered stone until the present invention. Accordingly, engineered stone slabs are also sometimes referred to as “Bretonstone slabs.” Most commonly, a high percentage of the stone included in an engineered stone slab is quartz. Therefore, engineered stone slabs are also sometimes referred to as “Quartz slabs.” Other terms for this highly specialized type of stone slab are “ES-BS” (Engineered Stone-Breton Stone) slabs or “ES-BS-QS” (Engineered Stone-Breton Stone-Quartz Stone) slabs.
With reference to
Because of the relatively low percentage of resin binder in engineered stone (typically 6% to 10%), as compared for example to the relatively high amount of water or polymer binder in concrete, there is insufficient binder in an engineered stone slab mixture to fill all of the voids between the stone granules 128 as they are naturally arranged after mixing. As a result, an engineered stone slab mixture initially contains much entrained air 134. And because there is insufficient resin to fill the voids, gentle shaking and vibrating will only cause settling of the mixture, without eliminating the voids between the stone granules, and cannot transform an engineered stone mixture into a void-free article.
Accordingly, it is necessary when fabricating an ES-BS stone slab 132 to force the stone granules 128 in the slab mixture into a “close-packed” configuration, as illustrated in
Definitions of Terms
Note that the following terms are used with the indicated definitions throughout this paper.
Composite Stone: Composite stone refers to all materials that are made by using some type of binder to glue together any type of stone materials, such as sand, gravel, marble, broken clay pieces, glass, mirror, quartz, or granite. Virtually any naturally occurring mineral or other inorganic material that is hard relative to the intended end use of the composite stone article can be used. There are many types of composite stone, including for example concrete, terrazzo, concrete blocks, concrete or cementitioius pavers and slabs, large concrete slabs as are used for manufacturing buildings or bridge decks, concrete road pavements, polymer concrete slabs and articles, decorative marble-based cementitious or resinous slabs, and finally, engineered stone slabs.
Engineered Stone slabs, also referred to as Bretonstone slabs, Quartz Slabs, (ES-BS) Slabs, or ES-BS-QS slabs. These terms are used synonymously herein to refer to a special class of composite stone slabs that contain very high (typically 90-94%) stone content and very low (typically 6-10%) resinous binder. The slabs are nonporous, having no voids in the interior or on the surface of the slab, and closely emulate the appearance and physical properties of natural stone slabs. Until the present invention, all such slabs were produced using a specialized and costly vacuum vibration press invented about 25 years ago by Breton S.p.A, and procured either from Breton, or more recently from other sources producing copies of the Breton design. The invention of engineered stone and the invention of the Breton press coincided, since the Breton press was designed specifically to produce engineered stone, and until the present invention engineered stone could only be produced using a press of the Breton design.
Stone Granules (SG), also referred to herein as granules or aggregates: This term refers generically to particles of stone (typically quartz or silica based stone), or of other hard materials (such as glass, granite, marble, and such like), having sizes in the range from about 0.2 mm up to 2-3 centimeters.
Quartz Powder (QP), also referred to herein as silica powder and filler: These terms refer to powdered material ranging in particle size from about 1 micron to about 300 microns in diameter. In the industry, QP is typically finely crushed and/or milled quartz or silica sand. It is readily available worldwide in a generally standard minus 325 (“−325”) mesh size, and can be made from marble (calcium carbonates), silica, quartz, glass, granite, or any other material that can be powdered and used for making quartz slabs. A special form of Quartz, known as crystobolite (made by heating quartz to over 1000 deg C.) is also used because of its unique whiteness. Due to the high surface roughness of crystobolite particles, and the correspondingly high oil absorption, an additional 1% to 2% resin is typically needed to wet the surfaces of the crystobolite granules, in addition to the 6% to 10% resin needed to fill in the gaps between the granules. Accordingly, for crystobolite-based ES-BS slabs, typically between 8% and 12% total resin is needed.
Resin: This term is used herein to refer to any resin and/or adhesive system capable of adhering together stone granules and quartz powder to form an engineered stone slab. Examples include epoxy, urethane, acrylic, vinyl ester, silicone resins, and even cementitious adhesives based on the various forms of hydraulic type cements. When the resin is a polyester material, then it may include various additives that affect the cure rate, and especially the adhesion of the resin to silica and/or quartz based minerals and granites. In the quartz slab industry, the resin is, for economic reasons, typically a modified polyester thermosetting resin.
Vacuum Vibration Press (VVP): This term is used herein to refer to an apparatus that can simultaneously apply sufficient pressure, vibration, and vacuum to an engineered stone slab mixture to force the stone granules in the mixture into a close-packed relationship that enables the limited amount of resin paste in the mixture to fill all of the remaining voids between the stone granules. It is the achievement of this close-packed configuration that enables the manufacture of an engineered stone slab. Until the present invention, the only type of VVP that was able to apply sufficient vibration and pressure to created close-packing of an ES-BS slab mixture was the Breton style of VVP and copies thereof.
It is important to note that the terms Vacuum Vibration Press, Vacuum Vibrating Press, and VVP as used herein do not apply to all types of press that can simultaneously apply pressure, vibration, and vacuum to a slab mixture. For example, polymer concrete slabs are sometimes manufactured by a press that applies small amounts of pressure, vibration, and vacuum to a PC slab mixture. However, such an apparatus would not meet the definition of a VVP as used herein, because the polymer concrete press would not be able to apply sufficient pressure and vibrational energy to an engineered stone slab mixture to achieve close-packing of the stone granules.
It should be noted that such NC-PC forming devices which include both vacuum vibration and pressing are very rare, because generally the vacuum and pressing functions are unnecessary for settling and flattening NC-PC mixtures. When vacuum vibration and pressing are employed by an NC-PC device, the amounts of vibration and pressing forces these devices apply are a tiny fraction of the forces required for close packing of ES-BS slab mixtures.
Close Packing (CP): This term refers to a tightly packed arrangement of the stone granules in an ES-BS slab mixture, which does not occur naturally, but can only be achieved by the application of strong pressure and vibrations to the mixture (as well as vacuum to remove the entrained air in the mixture). The applied pressure provides the “motivation” for the granules to become close-packed, and the very intense vibration causes the stone granules to move and “jiggle,” such that they are able to reorient and move past each other until a close-packed relationship is achieved. Achieving a close-packed arrangement of the stone granules in an ES-BS slab mixture is necessary for the production of ES-BS slabs.
Close Packing Energy (CPE): This term refers to a combination of high pressure and intense vibrational energy that is applied to the stone granules within an ES-BS slab mixture and is sufficient to force the stone granules in an ES-BS mixture to reorient and migrate into a close-packed arrangement. Until the present invention, the only press design that was capable of delivering CPE to an engineered stone slab mixture was the Breton design. Note that CPE is a combination of pressure and vibrational energy, and that different combinations of pressure and vibrational energy can provide CPE. Note also that the vibrational energy included in CPE is the vibrational energy that is present within the slab mixture, which will depend on the efficiency with which external “input” vibrational energy applied to the surface of the slab mixture is transmitted into the interior of the slab mixture.
Settling Energy (SE): this term refers to low to moderate vibration that is sufficient to cause a normal concrete mixture or polymer concrete mixture to settle, and to cause most air entrained in the mixture to rise to the surface, but is not sufficient to apply CPE to an engineered stone mixture. Note that the amount of SE that is required to settle a PC-NC slab mixture is dependent upon the total weight of the slab mixture being processed. Per square foot, the Settling Energy required for NC-PC slabs is only a small percentage of the CPE required for forming ES SLABS
SLAB: When this term is used herein in all capital letters, it refers to an engineered stone slab having an area of approximately 44 square feet, and a thickness of between 1 cm and 3 cm. This size of slab is standard in the industry. Older versions of the Breton VVP made slightly smaller slabs, and later models make slightly larger slabs. But, the term SLAB is used herein to refer to the standard 44 square foot, 1-3 cm thick size of engineered stone slab. A 1 cm thick SLAB weighs approximately 230 lbs, a 2 cm thick SLAB weighs approximately 460 lbs, and a 3 cm thick SLAB weighs approximately 700 lbs.
Pressing: This term is used herein to refer to the process of simultaneously applying vacuum, pressure, and vibration to an engineered stone slab mixture in a combination that provides CPE to the ES-BS slab mixture, and thereby forces the stone granules in the mixture into a close-packed arrangement. Until the present invention, the only style of VVP that could accomplish this was the Breton style press and copies thereof.
NC-PC composite stone: This term is used herein to refer generically to composite stone products in which the stone granules are not close-packed. Examples are “normal concrete” and “polymer concrete.” In an NC-PC slab mixture, sufficient liquid is provided to fill all the voids between the stone granules as they are naturally arranged when the slab mixture is first prepared. As a result, only very modest vibration, and possibly a small amount of pressure are required to level the mixture and to encourage any entrained air bubbles to rise to the surface and be eliminated.
NC-PC Vibrating Table: This term is used herein to refer to an apparatus that is designed to produce an NC-PC product, and which is not capable of applying CPE to an engineered stone slab mixture, even though it might be able to apply more moderate levels of vibration to an NC or PC slab mixture, possibly with vacuum, and in rare cases also with a small amount of pressure.
After the raw materials are weighed and measured, they are transported to a mixer 112 and mixed together 114. Typically, the mixer is charged with the stone granules, the resin, pigments, additives, etc are added, and the combination is mixed until the particles and granules are fully wetted. For purposes of color design, two, three, or more mixers may be employed, each with a different color of raw materials and pigments. This is illustrated in
The quartz powder is then added while the mixing continues. When combined with the resin, the quartz powder forms a binding paste that serves as the binder between the stone granules. The mixed materials are then formed into a single slab 116, either in a rubber mold, a metal mold, or on a sheet of paper or other suitable carrier which can be used to transport the formed slab into the vacuum vibration press (VVP). Note that the order of addition of the various materials can sometimes be changed for efficiency or other reasons.
As illustrated in
A void-free slab 132 can only be formed from the mixture if the stone granules are compacted into a close-packed configuration (see
Therefore, when the mixed material is spread and leveled in the mold, it is generally 15-50% thicker than the finished slab will be after pressing, because the granules 128 have not been forced yet into a close-packed relationship. For example, for a 2 cm SLAB, the spread and leveled material could be 2.3 to 3 cm thick before the pressing. If this mixture were processed in an NC-PC press, which would not be able to apply CPE to the mixture, the mixture after pressing would still be 10-30% thicker than if CPE had been applied, and would be porous, because the stone granules would be in a normal, non-compacted relationship, and so the mixture would still contain a significant amount of entrained air. Note that there is no existing NC-PC vibrating table or vibrating-press table that is able to apply even a small fraction of the pressure and vibration required to apply CPE to an engineered stone slab mixture.
Once the formed slab mixture 126 has been transferred to the press, it is simultaneously evacuated, vibrated, and pressed 118 in the Breton type VVP so as to compact the mixed material by forcing the granules into a close-packed arrangement 132, thereby minimizing the void volume between the granules 128 so that the small percentage of binding paste 130 is sufficient to fill all remaining space between the granules 128, so that there will be no voids 134 in the finished non-porous slab 132.
Once the slab has been pressed, it is transported to an oven or to some other location for curing 120. Depending upon the adhesive (resin) used to bind the particles together into the slab, the curing and hardening process can take place at ambient temperature or at an elevated temperature, and can require from a few minutes up to many hours. After curing and hardening, the slab is returned to room temperature (if heat has been applied).
The cured slab is then calibrated and polished 122 to a desired thickness and finish, using technology similar to what is used to grind, calibrate, and then polish conventional natural granite stone slabs. The final result 124 is a finished ES-BS slab that is non-porous and closely approximates the appearance and physical properties of natural stone slabs. Note that the presence of a single void on the surface of a slab will render the slab “second quality,” and more than two such voids will render the slab unsalable.
Disadvantages of the Breton VVP Design
The Breton vacuum vibrating press (VVP) is effective in producing ES-BS slabs because it delivers a combination of high pressing force and very high vibration energy that is sufficient to apply CPE to an engineered stone slab mixture, thereby forcing the stone granules into a close-packed arrangement. However, there are several disadvantages associated with the Breton style of VVP and procedure.
First, a Breton-style press 300 employs massive weight and power to simultaneously apply a vacuum, vibration, and downward pressure to the formed slab 312. Breton presses are therefore difficult to site and expensive to operate. With reference to
As seen in
In addition, a Breton press 300 must be anchored to a vibration-damped block 318 of concrete that is set beneath the concrete floor 320 and surrounded by a vibration isolating material 322. The vibration-damped block 318 is approximately 20′ long by 15′ wide by 20′ deep, and weighs another 300 tons. The press 300 plus the concrete block 318 “foundation” to which the press is anchored, form an “inertial base” weighing more than 325 tons, whose purpose is to force some of the applied vibration energy into the slab material, so that close packing can be achieved.
Without this enormous concrete block 318 and press base 316, close packing of the stone granules 128 would not result, because the applied vibrational energy would just pass through the SLAB, which only weighs 250-800 lbs, and would simply shake the base. Nevertheless, a Breton-style press has a very low energy efficiency. Even with the 325+ ton base as an inertial mass that resists the rapid vibration movement of the press plate 306, only a small percentage of the vibrational energy goes into the slab material 312 to accomplish the required close packing. This is partly because the massive base is only inertial, and is not actually a good “reflector” of vibrational energy back into the slab.
In addition, the more or less stationary inertial base also restricts and resists the movement and “jiggling” of grains and aggregate pieces in the slab, especially those grains and aggregate pieces that are near the bottom of the slab and close to the more or less immoveable inertial base.
Both of these problems must be overcome by applying a very high vibrational energy and pressure to the system. Because the formed slab 312 is positioned on a solid base 316 that is bolted to a concrete block 318, together weighing more than 325 tons, an enormous vibration force (about 90 KW per 45 sq foot SLAB or 2 kw per sq ft at 1000 to 5000 rpm) must be applied by a Breton-style press simultaneously with a static downward pressure on the vibrating press plate of 20-50 PSI, so as to properly vibrate and compress the SLAB. Essentially, to press and vibrate a quartz slab 312 weighing 250-700 pounds, the Breton press 300 is required to vibrate a mechanism 302, 316 weighing 50,000 to 75,000 pounds, plus the 300+ ton concrete block 318 it is bolted to. And still, only a modest amount of the applied vibrational energy is delivered into the slab to effect the close packing.
Also, there are incentives to apply more than just the minimum vibrational energy required to close-pack the slab. It is well known by ES-BS manufacturers, that when you apply more vibrational energy to a slab as it is pressed, then you can significantly reduce the amount of resin that is required, thereby saving cost (resin is expensive) and producing a slab more quickly and with even better appearance and physical properties. This can drive the energy costs still higher.
In addition, a Breton-style press imparts significant vibrations to the ground and surrounding structures. The entire Breton device, weighing more than 325 tons, is surrounded by foam vibration isolation walls 322, which isolate some of the vibration from the rest of the building. But in actual fact, the vibration from the device can be felt in the floor of the building from between 20 and 100 yards away.
Also, Breton-style presses are slow. The vacuum vibration cycle time per slab for a Breton press 300 is about 70-280 seconds, which reduces production throughput, and raises the operating cost. Also, a Breton-style press 300 costs about $6 to $7 million US dollars, which is very expensive.
Comparison Between PC-NC Slabs and Bretonstone Slabs
So as to fully understand the present invention and how it is distinguished from the prior art, it is important to understand the distinctions between engineered stone slabs and other types of composite stone products and the devices that are designed to make them, referred to herein generically as PC-NC products and vibration tables. The vast majority of composite stone materials, mainly concrete and polymer concrete, are produced for structural and/or industrial purposes, while engineered stone is produced mainly for decorative purposes. There have been a few attempts during the last 30 years to produce a decorative non-Bretonstone composite stone product, but they have been mainly unsuccessful. These include PBI, which failed in the decorative market; Granitech, which also failed in the decorative market; GRANIT 90, which is still produced but in very small quantities, and RESPECTASTONE, which is currently not in the market because of its high resin content and unsatisfactory appearance and physical performance as compared to Bretonstone.
Because the purpose, design, and effect of the ES-BS and of the PC-NC devices and products produced are so different, expertise in one area does not translate easily into expertise in the other area. Experts in the field of Polymer Concrete and Normal Concrete (PC-NC) and experts in the field of Engineered Stone do not normally discuss the distinction between these materials and their very different energy-principals of compaction, simply because the produced products are in entirely different categories as to use and manufacturing principals. Nevertheless, there are very important distinctions that must be understood in order to understand the present invention.
Normal concrete and cement type mixtures have a high liquid content, and are generally liquid, flowing, and easy to move. Air bubbles entrained in the mixture are often not a problem, because they tend to rise out of the mixture due to the high liquid content. Relatively low energy vibration, applied to the outside of the container or by placing the vibrator head into the mixture, is sufficient to remove the entrained air and settle the mixture into the desired shape.
Polymer concrete: These mixtures have a lower liquid content than normal concrete, because polymer is expensive, but the liquid content is still much more than for an engineered stone mixture, and is adequate to wet all the grains and pieces of aggregate in the PC mixture. A PC mixture normally flows easily, and can typically be leveled and formed by the application of very modest vibration, although vacuum degassing may be used to remove the entrained air, and in rare cases a mild pressure may be applied, typically when the PC slab must be pressed onto a form to create a non-flat shape.
With reference to
Because there is sufficient liquid plus fine grains or powder to fill all the space between the grains 326 and aggregate pieces 128, an applied vacuum, or vacuum with moderate vibration, will cause any entrained air to rise to the surface and be removed, and will typically cause the mixture to flow into a mold, although sometimes gentle pressing is also applied, especially when forming non flat items. This combination of moderate vibration and pressure is referred to herein as “settling energy” or “SE.”
A typical SE vibrational energy would be in the range of 1-5 HP per PC SLAB. This vibrational energy can be delivered by any number of NC-PC vibrating machines manufactured by hundreds of companies. Application of additional strong pressing and vibration to a normal concrete or polymer concrete mixture, for example at a level equivalent to CPE, would not further compact the mixture, because the mixture does not include any voids that can be filled or any other mechanism that would allow for further volume reduction. To the extent that the larger aggregates pieces 128 are moved closer together by SE, normally to the bottom of the mold, because their density is higher than the polymer-powder or water/cement binder, this process is similar to vibration-assisted sedimentation, and does not result in any special close packing of the settled pieces, or any reduction in volume.
In contrast, in manufacturing an ES-BS SLAB, the Bretonstone type of VVP applies CPE that includes an input vibration energy of more than 100 HP per SLAB.
There is also a very large difference in the pressure that is applied by a PC-NC press as compared to an ES-BS press. Typically, for a PC-NC press the pressing is solely for the purpose of flattening the PC-NC slab mixture, or to press a form down into the material in order to create a 3-d shape such as a trough or basin. As discussed above, because a PC-NC slab mixture contains enough liquid and powder to fill all of the voids between the grains and aggregates, the mixture is not compressible in volume. Hence only a very modest pressure needs to be applied by the platen or mold. Typically, a PC-NC press need only apply one or two psi to the slab mixture to accomplish the desired result.
In contrast, forcing the stone granules of an engineered stone mixture into a close-packed relationship requires an ES-BS Breton-style press to apply very high pressure to the slab mixture at the same time as the intense vibrations (and of course the applied vacuum). Typically, a Breton ES-BS press must apply between 20 and 50 psi.
There is also a significantly different relationship between slab size and required vibrational energy for PC-NC slabs as compared to ES-BS slabs. In the case of PC-NC materials, if the article to be vibrated is of lower weight, then proportionally less vibrational energy is required. However, this is not true for ES-BS slabs. The same very intense vibrational energy that is required for a 700 lb 3 cm thick SLAB is also required for a 250 lb 1 cm thick SLAB. Why? Because in the case of ES-BS materials, only a very small percentage of the vibrational energy (and pressing) is used as SE energy to flatten or mold the mixture, while most of the vibrational energy is applied as CPE energy to force the close packing of the grains and aggregates pieces, irrespective of the slab's weight.
PC-NC devices and ES-BS VVP presses also differ typically in the number of vibration devices that are used. For Breton-style ES-BS presses, most manufacturers use a single vibration device on the top plate. However it is possible to place 2 or more vibrating devices on the top press plate, provided that they are mechanically or otherwise “linked” to function as a single unit of force in amplitude and frequency, and are required to have uniform vibration energy and waves across the entire slab. Due to the large concrete base beneath the press table, it is not possible to attach vibrating devices to the bottom of the press table. In contrast, PC-NC presses may include one or two synchronized vibration devices on the bottom of the slab tray in addition to one or more vibration devices on the sides of the slab tray to facilitate movement of the slab mixture, especially into complex shapes or molds, especially for large bridge decks or wall sections of reinforced concrete. But the use of said multiple vibration devices does not radically change the principals of the function and design of a PC-NC press.
What is needed, therefore, is a system for manufacturing engineered stone slabs that is much lower in weight, requires much less input vibrational energy, transmits much less vibration to surrounding structures, delivers more vibrational energy to the slab mixture, requires less resin, is faster, and costs significantly less to purchase, site, and operate than a Breton-style VVP.
A vacuum vibration press for making engineered stone slabs applies as much or more CPE energy to a formed ES-BS slab as a conventional Breton press, while weighing less, costing less to manufacture, providing shorter press cycle times, requiring less resin in the slab recipe, and requiring less energy consumption to vibrate the slab as compared to a Breton press. It is estimated that the press of the present invention can be manufactured at a cost of approximately $1,000,000 US dollars. These advantages are realized by replacing the entire 350+ ton inertial base of the Breton design with a lightweight plate and a vibrating device below the plate. By applying vibrations to an ES-BS slab mixture from both above and below the slab, a high percentage of the vibrational energy is directed into the slab, so that much less vibrational energy is needed, less resin is required, and the press cycle time is shorter than for a Breton press. And because the massive base of the Breton press is eliminated, the weight is much less, and the cost and siting difficulties are much less than for a Breton press. In addition, almost no vibration is imparted to surrounding structures. This is because of the reduced vibrational energy, and also because the reduced weight allows use of nearly 100% effective vibration isolation.
In embodiments, instead of a rectangular vacuum chamber with enormous strength and weight, the press of the present invention includes a lightweight, cylindrical vacuum chamber inside of which the vibration mechanisms, press plate, and slab support are suspended. Accordingly, in contrast to the traditional Breton press, the vacuum chamber of the present invention is not vibrated, but is isolated from all vibration. This approach makes it feasible to use any type of design and/or construction for the vacuum chamber, including lightweight cylindrical designs, and also rectangular and massive designs if so desired. Whereas only about 5% of the machinery of the Breton device (the slab, the surface of the inertial base and the vibrating plate mechanism) is enclosed within the vacuum chamber, in embodiments of the present invention 100% of the pressing and vibration mechanism is enclosed in a vacuum chamber.
Instead of vibrating a 50,000 pound vacuum vibration press and its 300+ ton inertial base concrete block (requiring input of 90 kw per 45 sq. ft. SLAB), the press of the present invention is only required to vibrate about 3000 to 5000 pounds of machinery and SLAB, which requires input of only about 30 kw per 45 sq. ft. SLAB.
The portion of the press that is vibrated is referred to herein as the Vibration and Pressing Mechanism (VPM). The VPM is simple and light, comprising a Vibration Press Table Support Frame, or VPT-SF, which is also a vibrating press plate, a vibration table, a press plate and pressing mechanism, and at least one Vibration Device (VD) on each of the top and bottom vibrating press plates.
In various embodiments, the Vibration Press Table Support Frame (VPT-SF) is supported by vibration dampers that are fixed to the inside of the vacuum chamber. The vibration table is connected to and raised up from the support frame by air springs, air bags, or another suitable mechanism which allows the vibration table to move freely without transmitting vibration to the vacuum chamber. In embodiments, the top press plate and pressing mechanism are supported above the formed slab, and are lowered, positioned precisely, and vibrated so as to accomplish the required compaction of the slab material components. In essence, the present invention replaces the 350 ton inertial base of the Breton press design with a second vibrating press plate and vibration device below and in direct opposition to the upper press plate and upper vibration device. In embodiments, 2 or more vibration devices are included on either the top press plate and/or the bottom press plate. In embodiments where multiple vibrating devices are used on the same press plate, they are synchronized either mechanically, electronically or otherwise so that they act as a single vibrating device.
In various embodiments, the top and bottom vibrating devices can be operated at different frequencies, for example 4000 rpm for the top device and 2000 rpm for the bottom device. Of course, when the vibration devices are operated at different frequencies, then the applied vibrations drift into and out of phase at a rate that depends on the frequency difference between the devices. Embodiments are able to operate the vibration devices with various relationships of phase and/or frequency between the top and bottom devices.
Tests on prototypes of the present invention have shown that when only one of the top and bottom vibrating devices was operated during the pressing process, then the resulting product was not pressed well, lacking the required close packing of the stone granules and with much porosity and entrained air. The reason is that when vibration energy is applied to only the top or bottom of the slab, the vibration energy passes through the slab and moves the whole VP device, rather than forcing the vibrational energy into the slab. This is why the Breton design includes a huge inertial base.
The present invention is a lightweight, energy efficient, low cost vacuum vibration press for forming engineered stone slabs by simultaneously compressing and vibrating under vacuum a slab mixture having between 88% and 94% stone content. The press includes a vacuum chamber, a vibration table having a planar surface configured to support the slab mixture, said vibration table being located within the vacuum chamber, a pressing mechanism that is configured to compress between the pressing mechanism and the vibration table a slab mixture having between 88% and 94% stone granules and stone powder, and between 6% and 12% resin, said slab mixture containing insufficient resin and stone powder to fill all voids between the stone granules as configured after initial mixing of the slab mixture, a first vibration device attached to a bottom of the vibration table, and a second vibration device attached to a top of the pressing mechanism. The pressing mechanism and the vibration devices are configured to apply compressional and vibrational forces to the slab, said compressional and vibrational forces being sufficient in amplitude to force the stone granules into a close-packed configuration in which there is sufficient resin and stone powder to fill all remaining voids between the stone granules.
In embodiments, forcing the stone granules of a 45 square foot slab mixture into a close-packed configuration requires application to the slab mixture of no more than 25 HP of combined input vibrational energy by the vibration devices attached to the bottom of the vibration table and the top of the pressing mechanism.
In some embodiments, forcing the stone granules into a close-packed configuration requires the pressing mechanism to able to apply no more than 10 psi of pressure to the slab mixture.
In certain embodiments, the press is able to apply sufficient compressional and vibrational forces to the slab mixture to reduce its volume by at least 10% compared to its volume before the application of the compressional and vibrational forces.
In other embodiments the first vibration device and the second vibration device are synchronous in frequency and phase.
In various embodiments the vibration devices can apply vibration frequencies from 100 Hz up to 100,000 Hz by applying at least one of mechanical and ultrasonic energy, and where the vibration amplitude is between 0.001 mm and 2 mm.
In further embodiments, at least one of the vibration devices is driven by a force that is at least one of pneumatic, electrical, magnetic, and hydraulic.
Embodiments further include a transport mechanism for transporting the slab mixture onto and off of the vibration table. In some of these embodiments the transport mechanism includes a conveyor belt. In some of these embodiments, the vacuum chamber includes an upper section and a lower section, the upper and lower sections being separable to allow the conveyor belt to pass between the upper and lower sections so as to bring a slab mixture to the vibration table and remove a pressed slab from the vibration table, the upper and lower sections being sealable so as to form a seal that enables evacuation of the chamber during pressing of the slab mixture. And in some of these embodiments the conveyor belt is wider than the vacuum chamber, and the seal is formed between the upper and lower sections and the conveyor belt.
Various embodiments further include at least one vacuum volume reduction block within the vacuum chamber, the vacuum volume reduction block being configured to fill space within the vacuum chamber so as to reduce an evacuation volume that is subject to evacuation during pressing of the slab mixture.
Certain embodiments further include at least one space-adjusting mechanism that is configured to enable precise adjustment of a spacing between the pressing mechanism and a slab mixture supported by the vibration table, said precise adjustment resulting in a pressed composite stone slab having a uniform thickness across its length and width. In some of these embodiments the space-adjusting mechanism includes a screw jack.
In some embodiments the pressing device includes at least one of an air bag, an air cylinder, and a spring. In other embodiments the first vibration device and the second vibration device are synchronous in frequency and 180° out of phase. And in further embodiments the first vibration device and the second vibration device are synchronous in frequency and 90° out of phase.
In embodiments, the first vibration device and the second vibration device are synchronous in frequency and out of phase by an angle that is neither 180° nor 90°.
In some embodiments the first vibration device and the second vibration device vibrate at different frequencies. In other embodiments, the first vibration device and the second vibration device vibrate at different amplitudes. In further embodiments a vibration axis of the first vibration device is parallel to a vibration axis of the second vibration device.
In various embodiments a vibration axis of the first vibration device is perpendicular to a vibration axis of the second vibration device. In various embodiments, a vibration axis of the first vibration device is neither parallel nor perpendicular to a vibration axis of the second vibration device.
In embodiments, at least one of a vibration axis of the first vibration device and a vibration axis of the second vibration device is parallel to the planar surface of the vibration table.
In certain embodiments, at least one of a vibration axis of the first vibration device and a vibration axis of the second vibration device is not parallel to the planar surface of the vibration table.
In various embodiments, the first and second vibration devices are linear vibration devices, and a vibration axis of the first vibration device is normal to the planar surface of the vibration table, while a vibration axis of the second vibration device is parallel to the planar surface of the vibration table.
In some embodiments, at least one of the vibration devices is a rotary vibration device. In other embodiments, a plurality of vibration devices is attached to at least one of the pressing mechanism and the vibration table.
In further embodiments, at least one of the vibration devices is able to apply mechanical vibrations. And in certain embodiments at least one of the vibration devices is able to apply ultrasonic vibrations.
The features and advantages described herein are not all-inclusive and, in particular, many additional features and advantages will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the drawings, specification, and claims. Moreover, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and not to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter.
A vacuum vibration press for making engineered stone slabs applies as much or more CPE energy to a formed ES-BS slab mixture as a conventional Breton press, and produces ES-BS slabs having appearance and physical properties that are equal to or superior to slabs produced using a Breton-style press. The present invention also weighs significantly less than a Breton-style press, and costs less to manufacture. A Breton press costs approximately 7 million US dollars to produce and install, as compared to embodiments of the present invention with similar capacity of slab size and throughput that are expected to cost about 1.5 million US dollars to produce and install.
The present invention also provides shorter press cycle times. And because of the increased vibrational and grain “jiggling” power of the present invention, it is possible to reduce the resin % significantly in the slab recipe. On average, a 2.5 cm thick 45 sq ft slab produced using a Breton-style press requires about USD $90 of resin. The average Breton-style press can produce 100,000 slabs per year. In contrast, embodiments of the present invention, because of its increased vibrational energy efficiency, can reduce the required amount of resin up to 8%, or about $7.20 per slab. That translates into a yearly savings of $700,000+ per year in resin costs, while also requiring less energy consumption to vibrate the slab as compared to a Breton press.
As is illustrated in
An enlarged cross-sectional illustration of an embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
To understand how the present invention provides these benefits, it is useful to note the following points:
The rate of compaction and the amount of resin required by an engineered stone press does not depend on the amount of energy that is consumed by the apparatus to generate vibrations, but rather on how much vibrational energy is actually applied as close-packing action inside the slab mixture. A typical Breton press applies 2 kw/sq ft, but due to energy transmission inefficiencies only a small fraction of this energy is effective inside the slab. In contrast, embodiments of the present invention consume only about 0.6 kw/sq ft, but actually transfer much more vibrational energy to the slab mixture because the energy transfer efficiency is nearly 100%.
It is not what happens overall during the pressing time, which is typically 75 seconds for a Breton-style press and about 60 seconds or less for embodiments of the present invention, that matters, but rather what is happening inside the slab during that time on a microscopic level and on a time scale of 1 millisecond or less, because the actual incremental movements of the grains and aggregates pieces in the slab mixture is taking place at the frequency of the applied vibration. The present invention provides significantly improved performance on that microscopic level, as compared to Breton-style presses.
Because the close-packing process takes place on a millisecond time scale, and the movements of the stone granules are over distances of from about one to about 200 microns, it is not necessary to have a base weighing 350 tons. By replacing the 350 ton base of the Breton design with a second, relatively lightweight vibrating press plate below the slab, it is possible to manipulate the “shape” of the vibrational energy being applied to the slab, and to manipulate this vibrational “shape” on a microscopic distance and time scale for more effective granule “jiggling” and close packing function.
By replacing the 350 ton base with a bottom vibrating plate, and then suspending the entire device on a vibration isolation mechanism such as springs or airbags inside a vacuum chamber, nearly all of the vibration energy applied is actually delivered into the slab.
With reference to
Also, as can be seen in
In
With reference to
With reference to
A Vibration Press Table Support Frame- (VPT-SF) 600 is clamped or bolted by tank support brackets 602 to the inside of the vacuum chamber 408, which is cylindrical in the embodiment of
A vibrating table 604 is connected and suspended above the support frame 600 by air springs and/or bags 606 with appropriate height restraint and leveling devices (628 in
A press plate 612 and pressing mechanism 614 are supported above the formed slab 312 and are lowered, positioned precisely, and vibrated to accomplish the required compaction of the slab material components.
The Vibration Devices (VD) 304, which can be either traditional mechanical vibration devices (driven by pneumatic, electrical, magnetic, hydraulic, or any other devices that create mechanical vibration at a frequency of approximately 100-5000 rpm and amplitude of approximately 0.001 to 1 mm length) and/or ultrasonic transducers (frequency approximately 1000-5 MHz), are mounted to the bottom of the press table 604 and/or to the top of the press plate 612.
With respect to the plane of the slab 312 itself, the vibration mode can be linear or circular, and can be aligned in any desired direction. For example, the vibration mode can be vertical/linear, vertical/circular, horizontal/linear, horizontal/circular, tilted/linear, tilted/circular, or any combination thereof. The VD's cause the quartz slab 312 and the entire vibration press mechanism (only about 3000-5000 pounds of mechanism) to vibrate, but do not cause the vacuum chamber 400 to vibrate appreciably.
Depending on the dimensions of the slab to be pressed, in some embodiments a plurality of VD's 304A, 304B may be mounted either to the bottom of the press table 604 or to the top of the press plate 612, or both (as shown in
In some embodiments the modes and/or the axial directions of the VD's on the two press plates are not the same. For example,
The embodiments of
The embodiment of
In various embodiments the linear vibration axes or the rotational axes of the VD's 304A, 304B can have any relative angle from zero to 180 degrees. They can vibrate or rotate about axes pointing in the same or in different directions, and they can vibrate or rotate at the same or different rates. If the vibration or rotation rates are the same, the VD's 304A, 304B can have any relative phase relationship. In the embodiment of
In embodiments where a first group of VD's is attached to the bottom of the press table 604 and a second group of VD's is attached to the top of the press plate 612, each group of VD's is synchronized to vibrate in phase both in amplitude and in frequency within the group. The two groups can be synchronized with each other in any of several ways, including
phase and frequency synchronized, so that both the press table 604 and the press plate 612 rise and fall at same time;
frequency synchronized in opposite phase, so that the press table 604 rises when the press plate 612 falls and vice-versa, thereby periodically and simultaneously “pressing” against the quartz slab 304;
frequency synchronized and 90° out of phase, so that as the press plate 612 is going down, the press table 604 is moving laterally;
frequency synchronized and with some other phase offset;
frequency un-synchronized, i.e. the two groups operating at different frequencies;
operating at different amplitudes, so that the vibration applied by the VD's of the first group to the press table is at a different amplitude from the vibration applied by the VD's of the second group to the press plate; and
any combination of the above.
Note that embodiments of the present invention apply both mechanical and/or ultrasonic vibrations using any of these combinations of VD's and combinations of phase, frequency, and amplitude synchronization.
With reference to
Because of this method of lowering and positioning the vibrating press plate 612, embodiments of the present invention allow slabs to be produced with less thickness variance from side to side or end to end then for traditional Breton presses 300, thereby reducing the average amount of material that must be used to produce a slab of given finished thickness after grinding. The traditional press technology suspends and lowers the press plate 306 with large air bags and/or air springs 308 and without precision screw jacks 616, and therefore the levelness and parallel-ness of the press plate 306 relative to the press base 316 on which the formed slab 312 rests, is determined only by the levelness of the distribution of the slab material 312 that has been spread in the slab forming process. Therefore, uneven spreading results in uneven slab thickness from end to end or side to side, which means that to maintain a given finished and post calibration slab thickness, the average formed slab thickness before grinding must be greater, and this increases the average amount of slab material (and therefore the cost) of the slab for any given final thickness.
In some embodiments, ultrasonic vibration is applied to the pressing plate 612, the vibration press table 600, 604, or both, which can substantially reduce the pressing cycle time. This is economically possible due to the light weight of the vibrating press plates, their supports 600, 604 and the vibrating devices 304.
In operating a traditional Breton press 300, a significant percentage of the pressing cycle time is devoted to evacuating the vacuum chamber to below 100 Torr (and in some cases even down as low as 1-5 Torr). The volume of the vacuum chamber is a big factor in determining this time. This is one of the reasons for the choice of a low-volume rectangular vacuum chamber for the Breton machine, which of necessity requires massively thick and heavy walls to withstand the vacuum and the vibration.
In embodiments of the present invention, the press uses a lightweight cylindrical vacuum chamber 402 which would normally have a huge interior volume and which would therefore require either massive vacuum pumps or long press cycle times to evacuate. This large chamber volume problem is eliminated by the use of vacuum volume reduction blocks VVRB 700. These are lightweight blocks 700 made from a material such as urethane or another foam, balsa wood, expanded cell plastic, metal, or any other suitable material, which can withstand the vacuum without distending or expanding, and which can effectively and substantially reduce the volume of the vacuum chamber 402 and thereby shorten the press cycle time. An end view showing the VVRB blocks 700 is presented in
With reference to
The advantages of the present invention described herein are not mere theory. The inventor has constructed a fully functional prototype device and has tested the present invention to compare its performance with the performance of Breton-style presses.
The slab recipe used for this comparison was as follows: (% by weight)
The results of pressing this recipe using the prototype of the present invention were compared to slabs manufactured by a well know Bretonstone producer for several years that has produced more than 5000 slabs of the type selected.
This example, comparing a commercially produced product with a test slab produced by the present invention, shows 5 important distinctions:
In addition, it is estimated that a commercial production model of the present invention can be built for a fraction of the cost of a Breton-style device, and will weigh less than 3% of a Breton-style device.
The fact that the applied pressure and the input vibrational energy are both reduced by nearly 70% as compared to the Breton design, while the resulting ES-BS slabs are esthetically and physically equivalent to or better than ES-BS slabs produced using a Breton-style press, in combination with the fact that the weight of the VVP apparatus in the present invention is reduced to 7-10 tons as compared to 350 tons for a Breton press, demonstrates that the present invention is many times more efficient in transferring pressing and vibrational energy into the slab material as compared to the Breton design, and is clear evidence that the present invention is novel and non-obvious in comparison to the Breton design, which represents the only relevant prior art.
The foregoing description of the embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. Each and every page of this submission, and all contents thereon, however characterized, identified, or numbered, is considered a substantive part of this application for all purposes, irrespective of form or placement within the application. This specification is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of this disclosure.
This application is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/875,691, filed on May 2, 2013, which is a continuation in part of PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/051817, filed on Aug. 22, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/526,308, filed Aug. 23, 2011. U.S. application Ser. No. 13/875,691 also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/767,272, filed on Feb. 21, 2013. All of these applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4204820 | Toncelli | May 1980 | A |
| 4698010 | Toncelli | Oct 1987 | A |
| 5395228 | Aeseth et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5916504 | Edwards, Jr. et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5928585 | Toncelli | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6355191 | Toncelli | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6402499 | Braungardt et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6773641 | Toncelli | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 7025583 | Bald | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 20080260883 | Toncelli | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20120183735 | Moreno et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1262295 | Dec 2002 | EP |
| 2069651 | Nov 1970 | FR |
| 8254075 | Sep 1975 | IT |
| 85564 | Apr 1977 | IT |
| 6218829 | Aug 1994 | JP |
| 9155824 | Jun 1997 | JP |
| 20000012935 | Mar 2000 | KR |
| 0043192 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Appl. No. PCT/US2012/051817, dtd Dec. 10, 2012, 9 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140205703 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61526308 | Aug 2011 | US | |
| 61767272 | Feb 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13875691 | May 2013 | US |
| Child | 14222695 | US | |
| Parent | PCT/US2012/051817 | Aug 2012 | US |
| Child | 13875691 | US |
