Patent Grant
9418113
In traditional database systems, data is stored in one or more databases usually in the form of tables. The stored data is then queried and manipulated using a data management language such as a structured query language (SQL). For example, a SQL query may be defined and executed to identify relevant data from the data stored in the database. A SQL query is thus executed on a finite set of data stored in the database. Further, when a SQL query is executed, it is executed once on the finite data set and produces a finite static result. Databases are thus best equipped to run queries over finite stored data sets.
A number of modern applications and systems however generate data in the form of continuous data or event streams instead of a finite data set. Examples of such applications include but are not limited to sensor data applications, financial tickers, network performance measuring tools (e.g. network monitoring and traffic management applications), clickstream analysis tools, automobile traffic monitoring, and the like. Such applications have given rise to a need for a new breed of applications that can process the data streams. For example, a temperature sensor may be configured to send out temperature readings.
Managing and processing data for these types of event stream-based applications involves building data management and querying capabilities with a strong temporal focus. A different kind of querying mechanism is needed that comprises long-running queries over continuous unbounded sets of data. While some vendors now offer product suites geared towards event streams processing, these product offerings still lack the processing flexibility required for handling today's events processing needs.
In some examples, a method is provided for managing value-based windows on relations. The method may include receiving a continuous query that identifies an input relation. In one example, the input relation is a bounded set of data records related to an application. The method may then include identifying a configurable window operator associated with processing the input relation. Additionally, the method may include executing the continuous query based at least in part on the configurable window operator to generate an output relation. In some aspects, the method may also include providing data records of the output relation based at least in part on execution of the continuous query.
In some examples, the input relation may be an external data source generated based at least in part on an incoming continuous input data stream related to the application. Additionally, in some examples, the input relation may be an external data source generated based at least in part on information related to the application stored in a database of historical data. The input relation may also be an external data source generated based at least in part on one or more archived relations related to the application.
In some examples, the configurable window operator may be a generic value window operator defined over the input relation and the method may include applying the generic value window operator on an attribute in the input relation to generate the output relation. In other examples, the configurable window operator may be a current hour value window operator defined over the input relation and the method may include applying the current hour value window operator on an attribute in the input relation to generate the output relation. Additionally, in some examples, the configurable window operator may be a current period value window operator defined over the input relation and the method may include applying the current period value window operator on an attribute in the input relation to generate the output relation.
In some aspects, the method may also include displaying the output relation. In some examples, the output relation may include a subset of the data records from the input relation whose attribute values lie within a specified range defined by the configurable window operator.
In some examples, a non-transitory computer-readable medium may be provided. The medium may store a plurality of instructions executable by one or more processors. The instructions, in some examples, may include to generating an input relation and identifying a query configured to process the input relation. Additionally, the instructions may include identifying a configurable window operator associated with processing the input relation and executing the query based at least in part on the configurable window operator to generate an output relation. In some aspects, the instructions may also include providing data records of the output relation based at least in part on execution of the continuous query by displaying the output relation. In some examples, the output relation may include a subset of the data records from the input relation whose attribute values lie within a specified range defined by the configurable window operator.
In some examples, a system may be provided. The system may include a memory and one or more processors configured to access the memory and execute instructions to generate an input relation. The instructions may also be executed to identify a query configured to process the input relation and identify a configurable window operator associated with processing the input relation. Additionally, the instructions may be executed to execute the query based at least in part on the configurable window operator to generate an output relation.
The foregoing, together with other features and embodiments, will become more apparent upon referring to the following specification, claims, and accompanying drawings.
The detailed description is set forth with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the FIG. in which the reference number first appears. The use of the same reference numbers in different FIGS. indicates similar or identical items.
In the following description, various embodiments will be described. For purposes of explanation, specific configurations and details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. However, it will also be apparent to one skilled in the art that the embodiments may be practiced without the specific details. Furthermore, well-known features may be omitted or simplified in order not to obscure the embodiment being described.
In some applications, data may take the form of continuous, unbounded data streams, rather than finite stored data sets. Examples of such data streams may include stock ticks in financial applications, performance measurements in network monitoring and traffic management, log records or click-streams in web tracking and personalization, data feeds from sensor applications, network packets and messages in firewall-based security, call detail records in telecommunications, and the like. Due to their continuous nature, these data streams may typically be queried using continuous queries rather than traditional one-time SQL queries.
In general, a continuous data stream (also referred to as an event stream) may include a stream of data or events that may be continuous or unbounded in nature with no explicit end. Logically, an event or data stream may be a sequence of data elements (also referred to as events), each data element having an associated timestamp. A continuous event stream may be logically represented as a bag or set of elements (s, T), where “s” represents the data portion, and “T” is in the time domain. The “s” portion is generally referred to as a tuple or event. An event stream may thus be a sequence of time-stamped tuples or events.
In some aspects, the timestamps associated with events in a stream may equate to a clock time. In other examples, however, the time associated with events in an event stream may be defined by the application domain and may not correspond to clock time but may, for example, be represented by sequence numbers instead. Accordingly, the time information associated with an event in an event stream may be represented by a number, a timestamp, or any other information that represents a notion of time. For a system receiving an input event stream, the events arrive at the system in the order of increasing timestamps. There could be more than one event with the same timestamp.
In some examples, an event in an event stream may represent an occurrence of some worldly event (e.g., when a temperature sensor changed value to a new value, when the price of a stock symbol changed) and the time information associated with the event may indicate when the worldly event represented by the data stream event occurred.
For events received via an event stream, the time information associated with an event may be used to ensure that the events in the event stream arrive in the order of increasing timestamp values. This may enable events received in the event stream to be ordered based upon their associated time information. In order to enable this ordering, timestamps may be associated with events in an event stream in a non-decreasing manner such that a later-generated event has a later timestamp than an earlier-generated event. As another example, if sequence numbers are being used as time information, then the sequence number associated with a later-generated event may be greater than the sequence number associated with an earlier-generated event. In some examples, multiple events may be associated with the same timestamp or sequence number, for example, when the worldly events represented by the data stream events occur at the same time. Events belonging to the same event stream may generally be processed in the order imposed on the events by the associated time information, with earlier events being processed prior to later events.
The time information (e.g., timestamps) associated with an event in an event stream may be set by the source of the stream or alternatively may be set by the system receiving the stream. For example, in certain embodiments, a heartbeat may be maintained on a system receiving an event stream, and the time associated with an event may be based upon a time of arrival of the event at the system as measured by the heartbeat. It is possible for two events in an event stream to have the same time information. It is to be noted that while timestamp ordering requirement is specific to one event stream, events of different streams could be arbitrarily interleaved.
An event stream has an associated schema “S,” the schema comprising time information and a set of one or more named attributes. All events that belong to a particular event stream conform to the schema associated with that particular event stream. Accordingly, for an event stream (s, T), the event stream may have a schema ‘S’ as (<time_stamp>, <attribute(s)>), where <attributes> represents the data portion of the schema and can comprise one or more attributes. For example, the schema for a stock ticker event stream may comprise attributes <stock symbol>, and <stock price>. Each event received via such a stream will have a time stamp and the two attributes. For example, the stock ticker event stream may receive the following events and associated timestamps:
In the above stream, for stream element (<timestamp_N+1>, <ORCL,62>), the event is <ORCL,62> with attributes “stock_symbol” and “stock_value.” The timestamp associated with the stream element is “timestamp N+1”. A continuous event stream is thus a flow of events, each event having the same series of attributes.
As noted, a stream may be the principle source of data that CQL queries may act on. A stream S may be a bag (also referred to as a “multi-set”) of elements (s, T), where “s” is in the schema of S and “T” is in the time domain. Additionally, stream elements may be tuple-timestamp pairs, which can be represented as a sequence of timestamped tuple insertions. In other words, a stream may be a sequence of timestamped tuples. In some cases, there may be more than one tuple with the same timestamp. And, the tuples of an input stream may be requested to arrive at the system in order of increasing timestamps. Alternatively, a relation (also referred to as a “time varying relation,” and not to be confused with “relational data,” which may include data from a relational database) may be a mapping from the time domain to an unbounded bag of tuples of the schema R. In some examples, a relation may be an unordered, time-varying bag of tuples (i.e., an instantaneous relation). In some cases, at each instance of time, a relation may be a bounded set. It can also be represented as a sequence of timestamped tuples that may include insertions, deletes, and/or updates to capture the changing state of the relation. Similar to streams, a relation may have a fixed schema to which each tuple of the relation may conform. Further, as used herein, a continuous query may generally be capable of processing data of (i.e., queried against) a stream and/or a relation. Additionally, the relation may reference data of the stream.
In some examples, business intelligence (BI) may help drive and optimize business operations at particular intervals (e.g., on a daily basis in some cases). This type of BI is usually called operational business intelligence, real-time business intelligence, or operational intelligence (OI). Operational Intelligence, in some examples, blurs the line between BI and business activity monitoring (BAM). For example, BI may be focused on periodic queries of historic data. As such, it may have a backward-looking focus. However, BI may also be placed into operational applications, and it may therefore expand from a mere strategic analytical tool into the front lines in business operations. As such, BI systems may also be configured to analyze event streams and compute aggregates in real time.
In some examples, a continuous query language service (CQ Service) may be configured to extend a BI analytics server to handle continuous queries and enable real-time alerts. The CQ Service, in some aspects, may provide integration with a BI analytics server and a CQL engine. By way of example only, a BI analytics server may delegate continuous queries to the CQ Service and the CQ Service may also act as a logical database (DB) gateway for a CQL engine. In this way, the CQL engine may be able to leverage the BI analytics server for its analytics capabilities and semantic modeling.
In some examples, the CQ Service may provide, among other things, the following functionalities:
Additionally, in some examples, OI is a form of real-time dynamic, business analytics that can deliver visibility and insight into business operations. OI is often linked to or compared with BI or real-time BI, in the sense that both help make sense out of large amounts of information. But there are some basic differences: OI may be primarily activity-centric, whereas BI may be primarily data-centric. Additionally, OI may be more appropriate for detecting and responding to a developing situation (e.g., trend and pattern), unlike BI which may traditionally be used as an after-the-fact and report-based approach to identifying patterns.
In some examples, a business event analysis and monitoring (BEAM) system may include a CQL engine to process and/or receive in-flight data. For example, a CQL engine may be an in-memory real-time event processing engine configured to query or otherwise process incoming real-time information (e.g., BI or OI). The CQL engine may utilize or understand temporal semantics and be configured to allow definition of a window of data to process. Utilizing a CQL engine may, in some cases, involve always running a query on incoming data.
In some aspects, the CQL engine may include a full blown query language. As such, a user may specify computations in terms of a query. Additionally, the CQL engine may be designed for optimizing memory, utilizing query language features, operator sharing, rich pattern matching, rich language constructs, etc. Additionally, in some examples, the CQL engine may process both historical data and streaming data. For example, a user can set a query to send an alert when California sales hit above a certain target. Thus, in some examples, the alert may be based at least in part on historical sales data as well as incoming live (i.e., real-time) sales data.
In some examples, the CQL engine or other features of the below described concepts may be configured to combine a historical context (i.e., warehouse data) with incoming data in a real-time fashion. Thus, in some cases, the present disclosure may describe the boundary of database stored information and in-flight information. Both the database stored information and the inflight information may include BI data. As such, the database may, in some examples, be a BI server or it may be any type of database. Further, in some examples, the features of the present disclosure may enable the implementation of the above features without users knowing how to program or otherwise write code. In other words, the features may be provided in a feature-rich user interface (UI) or other manner that allows non-developers to implement the combination of historical data with real-time data.
In some examples, the above concepts may be utilized to leverage the rich real-time and continuous event processing capabilities associated with complex event processing. Several features may be supported such as, but not limited to, archived relations. As such, in order to leverage such features (e.g., rich, real-time and continuous event processing), the system may be configured to transparently deal with startup state and runtime state of relational data. In other words, the system may be configured to manage a query that is non-empty at the instant of its creation (i.e., an archived relation).
In some examples, an archived relation may be utilized. As such, when a CQL engine sees a query that indicates that it is based on an archived relation; that archived relation may also indicate that there are certain entities it can call to query for historical context, for example. In some examples, a data definition language (DDL) may indicate annotations about the archived relation such as, but not limited to, how do to the query, what are the important columns in the table, and/or where to send the rest of the data. In some examples, once the query is constructed in the CQL engine (e.g., as a graph), the system may analyze the query graph. Additionally, in some aspects, there are certain operators that are stateful, like “distinct,” “group aggr,” “pattern,” and/or “group by.” However, stateless operators may just take input and send it to the parent, for example, down-stream operators. So, one approach is to store this entire table here. However, utilizing archived relations, the system may analyze the query graph and decide which of the lowest stateful operator that it can use to query the archive. In some examples, the system (or one or more computer-implemented methods) may retrieve the state at the lowest stateful operator reached while traversing the graph. For example, the query graph may be analyzed in a topological order from the source. Based at least in part on this first stateful operator, the CQL engine may then determine the optimal amount of data to be fetched in order to initialize the state of the operators for a query defined over an archived relation.
In at least one non-limiting example, source operators like relation and/or source may come first in the topological traversal with query output and/or root coming last. For example, if the CQL query looks like: select sum (c1) from R1 where c2>c25, the plan for this query may look like: RelationSource→SELECT→GroupAggr. Thus, following the topological order, and since RelationSource and SELECT are both stateless, the lowest stateful operator may be GroupAggr. In this way, the stateful operators of a query (GroupAggr in this example) may enable the query engine to populate the query engine with historical data from a data store prior to receiving streaming data. This may be enabled based at least in part on the fact that the query is analyzing an archived relation and the archived relation has been indicated as such.
In some examples, a window size for a given archive relation may be specified by a user. A window, in some aspects, in relation to an archived relation, may include a node in a query graph that analyzes or otherwise evaluates incoming active data. In other words, the window may define the amount of active data that may be analyzed and/or processed by the query engine and/or the amount of historical data that will be included in the archived relation.
At a high level, once a window is applied on a Stream it becomes a Relation and then regular relational logic may be applied, as with relational databases. As tuples arrive and leave the window, the Relation under consideration changes with queries compiled against it emitting results at the same time. CQL may support RANGE (up to nanoseconds granularity), ROWS, PARTITION BY and extensible windows. These windows are examples of stream-to-relation operators. On the other hand, ISTREAM (i.e., insert stream), DSTREAM (i.e., delete stream) and RSTREAM (i.e., relation stream) are relation-to-stream operators. In some examples, a user, developer, and/or manager may set the window size (e.g., via a UI) provided by the query engine or one or more computing systems operating or hosting the query engine. In some examples, a window on a stream may be a time-based range window. For example, a configurable value window on an archived relation may be specified using window size and the attribute on which the window is calculated. When there is a configurable value window specified on top of archived relation, a snapshot query may be computed and the snapshot tuples which are within window limits may be output. Additionally, after state initialization, the value window may be applied on incoming active data. In some examples, only the incoming active data will be inserted into window whose window attribute's value is differing from current event time for less than the window size.
As discussed above, in some examples, the processing of continuous data streams using continuous queries may involve applying a window on the stream, specifying that a fixed number of the most recent stream tuples are considered instead of the entire stream history, or specifying that only stream tuples that have arrived within a specified time are considered, instead of the entire stream history. As further discussed above, in some examples, continuous query processing may involve the use of various operators that process incoming continuous streams to convert it to a relation or operators that convert an input relation to output stream data.
In certain situations, however, a user may set a query that may require the processing of incoming real-time data related to an application with data related to the application that is stored in a relation (e.g., an external data source). If the size of the relation is very large, the amount of data that is needed to be brought into memory to query this data may also be very large. Since the CQL engine may typically be an in-memory real-time event processing engine configured to query or otherwise process incoming real-time information, it may not be scalable to join such a high rate input stream with a big sized relation in limited memory.
Accordingly, in some embodiments, a window operator may be defined for processing a relation in a continuous query (e.g., a CQL query). In one example, the window operator may be user-configurable. The window operator may enable processing a subset of data records in the relation over a specified range of time. Accordingly, a subset of the data records of the relation may be queried in limited memory rather than processing the entire set of data records of the relation in memory.
In certain embodiments, an input relation may be generated. In one example, the input relation may be an external data source that includes a bounded set of data records related to an application. In one example, the input relation may be generated from a continuous input data stream. Alternatively, the input relation may be generated based on a database of historical data related to the application. Additionally, the input relation may initially be generated from one or more archived relations and the remainder of the input relation may be generated based on the incoming streaming data.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure, a continuous query (e.g., a CQL query) that identifies the input relation may be received. A window operator defined over the input relation may then be identified. The query may be executed based at least in part on the window operator to generate an output relation. In one embodiment, the output relation may include a subset of data records from the input relation whose attribute values may lie within a specified range defined by the window operator in the input relation.
The techniques described above and below may be implemented in a number of ways and in a number of contexts. Several example implementations and contexts are provided with reference to the following figures, as described below in more detail. However, the following implementations and contexts are but a few of many.
In some examples, the networks 108 may include any one or a combination of multiple different types of networks, such as cable networks, the Internet, wireless networks, cellular networks, intranet systems, and/or other private and/or public networks. While the illustrated example represents the users 102 accessing the service provider computers 106 over the networks 108, the described techniques may equally apply in instances where the users 102 interact with one or more service provider computers 106 via the one or more user devices 104 over a landline phone, via a kiosk, or in any other manner. It is also noted that the described techniques may apply in other client/server arrangements (e.g., set-top boxes, etc.), as well as in non-client/server arrangements (e.g., locally stored applications, etc.).
The user devices 104 may be any type of computing device such as, but not limited to, a mobile phone, a smart phone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a laptop computer, a desktop computer, a thin-client device, a tablet PC, etc. In some examples, the user devices 104 may be in communication with the service provider computers 106 via the networks 108, or via other network connections. Further, the user devices 104 may also be configured to provide one or more queries or query statements for requesting data of the databases 112 (or other data stores) to be processed.
In some aspects, the service provider computers 106 may also be any type of computing devices such as, but not limited to, mobile, desktop, thin-client, and/or cloud computing devices, such as servers. In some examples, the service provider computers 106 may be in communication with the user devices 104 via the networks 108, or via other network connections. The service provider computers 106 may include one or more servers, perhaps arranged in a cluster, as a server farm, or as individual servers not associated with one another. These servers may be configured to perform or otherwise host features described herein including, but not limited to, the management of CQL relations, generation of input relations, configurable window operators associated with the input relations, and the generation of output relations, described herein. Additionally, in some aspects, the service provider computers 106 may be configured as part of an integrated, distributed computing environment that includes the streaming data source computers 110 and/or the databases 112.
In one illustrative configuration, the service provider computers 106 may include at least one memory 136 and one or more processing units (or processor(s)) 138. The processor(s) 138 may be implemented as appropriate in hardware, computer-executable instructions, firmware, or combinations thereof. Computer-executable instruction or firmware implementations of the processor(s) 138 may include computer-executable or machine-executable instructions written in any suitable programming language to perform the various functions described.
The memory 136 may store program instructions that are loadable and executable on the processor(s) 138, as well as data generated during the execution of these programs. Depending on the configuration and type of service provider computers 106, the memory 136 may be volatile (such as random access memory (RAM)) and/or non-volatile (such as read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, etc.). The service provider computers 106 or servers may also include additional storage 140, which may include removable storage and/or non-removable storage. The additional storage 140 may include, but is not limited to, magnetic storage, optical disks, and/or tape storage. The disk drives and their associated computer-readable media may provide non-volatile storage of computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, and other data for the computing devices. In some implementations, the memory 136 may include multiple different types of memory, such as static random access memory (SRAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), or ROM.
The memory 136, the additional storage 140, both removable and non-removable, are all examples of computer-readable storage media. For example, computer-readable storage media may include volatile or non-volatile, removable or non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. The memory 136 and the additional storage 140 are all examples of computer storage media.
The service provider computers 106 may also contain communications connection(s) 142 that allow the service provider computers 106 to communicate with a stored database, another computing device or server, user terminals, and/or other devices on the networks 108. The service provider computers 106 may also include input/output (I/O) device(s) 144, such as a keyboard, a mouse, a pen, a voice input device, a touch input device, a display, one or more speakers, a printer, etc.
Turning to the contents of the memory 136 in more detail, the memory 136 may include an operating system 146 and one or more application programs or services for implementing the features disclosed herein including at least an input relation module 148, a configurable window operator module 150 and an output relation module 152. As used herein, modules may refer to programming modules executed by servers or clusters of servers that are part of a service. In this particular context, the modules may be executed by the servers or clusters of servers that are part of the service provider computers 106.
In some examples, the input relation module 148 may be configured to, receive, identify, generate, or otherwise provide one or more input relations. In one embodiment, the input relation 154 is an external data source that includes a bounded set of data records related to an application (e.g., a relation or an archived relation).
In one example, the input relation 154 may be an external data source that may be generated based on an incoming continuous input data stream that includes a stream of data or events related to the application (e.g., from the data source computers 110), wherein the input relation may include a bounded set of data records that comprise one or more of the event stream entries s1, s2, . . . , sN in the continuous data stream. In another example, the input relation 154 may be an external data source that may be generated based on information related to the application stored in a database of historical data (for e.g., the databases 112), wherein the input relation may include a bounded set of data records that include or more event stream entries (e.g., s1 and/or s2, more entries, or less) that are pre-loaded from Persistence, or a database of historical data.
In other examples, the input relation 154 may be an external data source that may be generated based on one or more archived relations that may include reference to one or more event stream entries s1, s2, . . . , sN related to the application. In one example, the input relation 154 may be initially generated from one or more archived relations and the remainder of the input relation may be generated based on the incoming streaming data.
In one example, the data records in the input relation 154 may include a sequence of time stamped tuples or data records that capture the changing state of the input relation 154. In one embodiment, each data record in the input relation 154 may include an event stream entry that may be represented by the following schema ‘S’: (<time_stamp>, <attribute(s)>), where <attributes> represents the data portion of the schema and can comprise one or more attributes.
The configurable window operator module 150 may be configured to define one or more configurable window operators 156 for processing the input relation in a continuous query. There are various ways in which a configurable window operator may be defined for an input relation. In one embodiment, the configurable window operator may be user-configurable. In certain embodiments, and as will be discussed in detail below, the configurable window operator may produce an output relation which includes a subset of data records from the input relation whose attribute values lie in a range specified by the configurable window operator with respect to the timestamp t of a data record in the input relation.
In one embodiment, a first type of configurable window operator may be defined as a “generic value” window operator over the input relation. In one example, the “generic value” window operator may be expressed as a sub-clause on the input relation 154 as follows:
RANGE range_val ON attr.
In certain embodiments, the “generic value” window operator may produce an output relation which includes a subset of data records from the input relation whose attribute “attr” values lie in the specified range, “range_val” with respect to the timestamp t of a corresponding data record in the input relation. An example operation of the manner in which the “generic value” window operator may be defined over an input relation in a CQL query is discussed in detail below.
In another embodiment, a second type of configurable window operator may be defined as a “current hour value” window operator on the input relation. In one example, the “current hour value” window operator may be expressed as a sub-clause on an input relation as follows:
CurrentHour on attr
In one embodiment, the “current hour value” window operator may produce an output relation which includes a subset of data records from the input relation whose attribute “attr” values lies in the current hour, “CurrentHour” with respect to the timestamp t of a corresponding data record in the input relation. An example operation of the manner in which the “current hour value” window operator may be defined over an input relation in a CQL query is discussed in detail below.
In another embodiment, a third type of configurable window operator may be defined as a “current period value” window operator on the input relation. In one example, the “current period value” window operator may be expressed as a sub-clause on an input relation as follows:
CurrentPeriod (“t1”, “t2”) on attr
In one embodiment, the “current period value” window operator may produce an output relation which includes a subset of data records from the input relation whose attribute “attr” values lies in the current time period, “CurrentPeriod” with respect to the timestamp t of a corresponding data record in the input relation. An example operation of the manner in which the “CurrentPeriod” window operator may be defined over an input relation in a CQL query is discussed in detail below.
Although the above discussion relates to defining three types of configurable window operators over input relations in a CQL query, it is to be appreciated that additional types of window operators may be defined by the configurable window operator module 150 on input relations in a CQL query, in at least some embodiments.
The output relation module 152 may be configured to generate one or more output relation(s) 158. In one embodiment, the output relation module 152 may be configured to receive a CQL query from a CQL Engine and/or CQ Service. In certain embodiments, the output relation module 152 may identify an input relation in the CQL query, identify a configurable window operator defined over the input relation and execute the CQL query based at least in part on the configurable window operator to generate an output relation. Alternatively, in some examples, when a query (e.g., a CQL query) is identified or received that includes an input relation, the CQL engine and/or CQ Service may parse the query 206 to process the input relation and generate the output relation. In one embodiment, and as will be discussed in detail below, the output relation includes a subset of data records from the input relation whose attribute values lie within a specified range defined by the configurable window operator in the input relation. In certain embodiments, a CQL query may then be received to process the subset of the data records in the output relation in memory.
CREATE RELATION CallCentreRecords (callerName char (50), callTime, timestamp).
Per this definition, the input relation, “CallCentreRecords” contains two attributes, a first attribute “callerName”, a second attribute, “callTime” and a timestamp. In one example, the input relation, “CallCentreRecords” may store continuous data streams related to call detail records from a call center. As used herein, a “call center” typically refers to a service network in which customer service representatives may provide services to customers via telephones. Continuous data streams from a call center may typically include call-by-call information related to a call that is summarized over short time-intervals. Such call-by-call information may include, for example, a timestamp for when a call was recorded or received in the database, a caller name, the time that the call was placed, and the like.
Referring to the example shown in
In certain embodiments, a CQL query may be identified or received that includes the “CallCenterRecords”, input relation 302 as follows:
SELECT*FROM CallCentreRecords [RANGE 1 HOUR ON callTime]
As per the CQL query shown above, the configurable window operator is identified as a “generic value” window operator 303. The CQ1 query is then executed based at least in part on the “generic value” window operator 303 by applying the “RANGE 1 HOUR” window operator on the attribute “callTime” in the “CallCenterRecords”, input relation 302 to generate an output relation. An output relation, 304, that is generated as a result of applying the “RANGE 1 HOUR” window operator 303 is also shown in
In one embodiment, and as illustrated in
Consider the first data record in the “CallCenterRecords” input relation 302. As per the information in the “CallCenterRecords” input relation 302, this record has a timestamp of Jan. 21, 2012 9:00:00 AM and indicates that a call was placed by a caller “Robin” at Jan. 21, 2012 8:30:00 AM. When the “RANGE 1 HOUR” window operator 303 is applied on the “callTime” attribute, it is determined whether the first data record is to be inserted into the CallCenterRecords” output relation 304. In this example, the first data record in the “CallCenterRecords” input relation 302 will be inserted into the “CallCenterRecords” output relation 304 because the call time (8:30:00 AM) of this call was placed within a 1 hour range from the current timestamp of Jan. 21, 2012 9:00:00 AM, wherein the 1 hour range from the current timestamp is defined to be (8.00 AM-9.00 AM) for this data record. In one embodiment, and as illustrated in
Similarly, the second data record in the “CallCenterRecords” input relation 302 which indicates that a call was placed by caller “Michael” at Jan. 21, 2012 8:45:00 AM will also be inserted into the “CallCenterRecords” output relation 304 since the call time (8:45:00 AM) of this call was also placed within a 1 hour range from the current timestamp of Jan. 21, 2012 9:00:00 AM, wherein the 1 hour range from the current timestamp is defined to be (8:00:00 AM-9:00:00 AM) for this data record.
The next data record in the “CallCenterRecords” input relation 302 indicates that the current time stamp has now moved to Jan. 21, 2012 10:00:00 AM. It may further be observed that two data records have been inserted into the input relation 302 at the current time stamp of 10:00:00 AM. These records include a caller, “Sandeep” whose call was placed at Jan. 21, 2012, 9:06:00 AM and a caller “Anand” whose call was placed at Jan. 21, 2012 9:30:00 AM. Since, these records lie within the 1 hour range of the current timestamp of Jan. 21, 2012 10:00:00 AM, wherein the 1 hour range from the current timestamp is defined to be (9:00:00 AM-10:00:00 AM) they are also inserted into the “CallCenterRecords” output relation 304 as indicated by the + operator in the SIGN column next to these data records. However, it may be observed that the data records which include callers, “Robin” and “Michael” now no longer lie within the 1 hour range (9:00:00 AM-10:00:00 AM) from the current timestamp. Therefore, these records are removed from the “CallCenterRecords” output relation 304 at the current timestamp of 10:00:00 AM. In one embodiment, and as illustrated in
Now, the current time stamp has moved to Jan. 21, 2012, 3:00:00 PM. The data records in the “CallCenterRecords” input relation 302 at this time stamp include caller, “Unmesh” whose call was placed at Jan. 21, 2012 11:00:00 AM and caller, “Alex” whose call was placed at Jan. 21, 2012 1:15:00 PM. However, these records are not inserted into the output relation 304 since the call times of these calls were not placed within the 1 hour range of the current timestamp of Jan. 21, 2012, 3:00:00 PM, wherein the 1 hour range from the current timestamp is defined to be (2:00:00 PM-3:00:00 PM). However caller “Sundar” whose call was placed at Jan. 21, 2012 2:30:00 PM is inserted into the “CallCenterRecords” output relation 304 as this call was placed within the 1 hour range of the current timestamp of Jan. 21, 2012, 3:00:00 PM. Similarly, it may be observed that the data records which include callers, “Sandeep” and “Anand” now no longer lie within the 1 hour range from the current timestamp of Jan. 21, 2012, 3:00:00 PM. Therefore, these records are removed from the “CallCenterRecords” output relation 304 as indicated by a − entry in the SIGN column corresponding to the data records.
It is to be appreciated that the information listed in the “CallCenterRecords” input relation 302 and the “CallCenterRecords” output relation 304 is merely provided by way of example and is not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize many variations, modifications, and alternatives.
In certain embodiments, a CQL query may be identified or received that includes the “CallCenterRecords”, input relation 402 as follows:
SELECT callerName, callTime FROM CallCentreRecords[CurrentHour ON callTime]
As per the CQL query shown above, the configurable window operator is identified as a “current hour” window operator 403. The CQL query is then executed based at least in part on the “current hour” window operator by applying the “CurrentHour” window operator 403 on the attribute “callTime” in the “CallCenterRecords”, input relation 402 to generate an output relation. An output relation 404 that is generated as a result of applying the “CurrentHour” window operator 403 is also shown in
In one embodiment, and as illustrated in
In certain embodiments, a CQL query may be identified or received that includes the “CallCenterRecords”, input relation 502 as follows:
SELECT callerName, callTime FROM CallCentreRecords[CurrentPeriod (“0900”, “1500” ON callTime]
As per the CQL query shown above, the configurable window operator is identified as a “current period” window operator 503. The CQL query is then executed based at least in part on the “CurrentPeriod” window operator 503 by applying the “CurrentPeriod” window operator 503 on the attribute “callTime” in the “CallCenterRecords”, input relation 502 to generate an output relation. An output relation 504 that is generated as a result of applying the “CurrentPeriod” window operator 503 is also shown in
In one embodiment, and as illustrated in
Additionally, some, any, or all of the processes may be performed under the control of one or more computer systems configured with executable instructions and may be implemented as code (e.g., executable instructions, one or more computer programs, or one or more applications) executing collectively on one or more processors, by hardware, or combinations thereof. As noted above, the code may be stored on a computer-readable storage medium, for example, in the form of a computer program comprising a plurality of instructions executable by one or more processors. The computer-readable storage medium may be non-transitory.
In some examples, the one or more service provider computers 106 (e.g., utilizing at least the input relation module 148, the configurable window operator module 150 or the output relation module 152) shown in at least
Client computing devices 802, 804, 806, and 808 may be general purpose personal computers (including, by way of example, personal computers and/or laptop computers running various versions of Microsoft Windows and/or Apple Macintosh operating systems), cell phones or PDAs (running software such as Microsoft Windows Mobile and being Internet, e-mail, SMS, Blackberry, or other communication protocol enabled), and/or workstation computers running any of a variety of commercially-available UNIX or UNIX-like operating systems (including without limitation the variety of GNU/Linux operating systems). Alternatively, client computing devices 802, 804, 806, and 808 may be any other electronic device, such as a thin-client computer, Internet-enabled gaming system, and/or personal messaging device, capable of communicating over a network (e.g., network 810 described below). Although exemplary system environment 800 is shown with four client computing devices, any number of client computing devices may be supported. Other devices such as devices with sensors, etc. may interact with server 812.
System environment 800 may include networks 810. Networks 810 may be any type of network familiar to those skilled in the art that can support data communications using any of a variety of commercially-available protocols, including without limitation TCP/IP, SNA, IPX, AppleTalk, and the like. Merely by way of example, network 1510 can be a local area network (LAN), such as an Ethernet network, a Token-Ring network and/or the like; a wide-area network; a virtual network, including without limitation a virtual private network (VPN); the Internet; an intranet; an extranet; a public switched telephone network (PSTN); an infra-red network; a wireless network (e.g., a network operating under any of the IEEE 802.11 suite of protocols, the Bluetooth protocol known in the art, and/or any other wireless protocol); and/or any combination of these and/or other networks.
System environment 800 also includes one or more server computers 812 which may be general purpose computers, specialized server computers (including, by way of example, PC servers, UNIX servers, mid-range servers, mainframe computers, rack-mounted servers, etc.), server farms, server clusters, or any other appropriate arrangement and/or combination. In various embodiments, server 812 may be adapted to run one or more services or software applications described in the foregoing disclosure. For example, server 812 may correspond to a server for performing processing described above according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Server 812 may run an operating system including any of those discussed above, as well as any commercially available server operating system. Server 812 may also run any of a variety of additional server applications and/or mid-tier applications, including HTTP servers, FTP servers, CGI servers, Java servers, database servers, and the like. Exemplary database servers include without limitation those commercially available from Oracle, Microsoft, Sybase, IBM and the like.
System environment 800 may also include one or more databases 814, 816. Databases 814, 816 may reside in a variety of locations. By way of example, one or more of databases 814, 816 may reside on a non-transitory storage medium local to (and/or resident in) server 812. Alternatively, databases 814, 816 may be remote from server 812, and in communication with server 812 via a network-based or dedicated connection. In one set of embodiments, databases 814, 816 may reside in a storage-area network (SAN) familiar to those skilled in the art. Similarly, any necessary files for performing the functions attributed to server 812 may be stored locally on server 812 and/or remotely, as appropriate. In one set of embodiments, databases 814, 816 may include relational databases, such as databases provided by Oracle, that are adapted to store, update, and retrieve data in response to SQL-formatted commands.
Computer system 900 may additionally include a computer-readable storage media reader 912, a communications subsystem 914 (e.g., a modem, a network card (wireless or wired), an infra-red communication device, etc.), and working memory 918, which may include RAM and ROM devices as described above. In some embodiments, computer system 900 may also include a processing acceleration unit 916, which can include a digital signal processor (DSP), a special-purpose processor, and/or the like.
Computer-readable storage media reader 912 can further be connected to a computer-readable storage medium 910, together (and, optionally, in combination with storage device(s) 908) comprehensively representing remote, local, fixed, and/or removable storage devices plus storage media for temporarily and/or more permanently containing computer-readable information. Communications system 914 may permit data to be exchanged with network 912 and/or any other computer described above with respect to system environment 900.
Computer system 900 may also comprise software elements, shown as being currently located within working memory 918, including an operating system 920 and/or other code 922, such as an application program (which may be a client application, Web browser, mid-tier application, RDBMS, etc.). In an exemplary embodiment, working memory 918 may include executable code and associated data structures used for relying party and open authorization-related processing as described above. It should be appreciated that alternative embodiments of computer system 900 may have numerous variations from that described above. For example, customized hardware might also be used and/or particular elements might be implemented in hardware, software (including portable software, such as applets), or both. Further, connection to other computing devices such as network input/output devices may be employed.
Storage media and computer readable media for containing code, or portions of code, can include any appropriate media known or used in the art, including storage media and communication media, such as but not limited to, volatile and non-volatile (non-transitory), removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage and/or transmission of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data, including RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disk (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, data signals, data transmissions, or any other medium which can be used to store or transmit the desired information and which can be accessed by a computer.
Although specific embodiments of the disclosure have been described, various modifications, alterations, alternative constructions, and equivalents are also encompassed within the scope of the disclosure. Embodiments of the present disclosure are not restricted to operation within certain specific data processing environments, but are free to operate within a plurality of data processing environments. Additionally, although embodiments of the present disclosure have been described using a particular series of transactions and steps, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the scope of the present disclosure is not limited to the described series of transactions and steps.
Further, while embodiments of the present disclosure have been described using a particular combination of hardware and software, it should be recognized that other combinations of hardware and software are also within the scope of the present disclosure. Embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented only in hardware, or only in software, or using combinations thereof.
The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. It will, however, be evident that additions, subtractions, deletions, and other modifications and changes may be made thereunto without departing from the broader spirit and scope. Illustrative methods and systems for providing features of the present disclosure are described above. Some or all of these systems and methods may, but need not, be implemented at least partially by architectures such as those shown in
Although embodiments have been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as illustrative forms of implementing the embodiments. Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments could include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements, and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements, and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements, and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4996687 | Hess et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5051947 | Messenger et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5339392 | Risberg et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5495600 | Terry et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5706494 | Cochrane et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5802262 | Van De Vanter | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5802523 | Jasuja et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5822750 | Jou et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5826077 | Blakeley et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5850544 | Parvathaneny et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5857182 | Demichiel et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5918225 | White et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5920716 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5937195 | Ju et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5937401 | Hillegas et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6006235 | Macdonald et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6011916 | Moore et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6041344 | Bodamer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6081801 | Cochrane et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6092065 | Floratos et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6108666 | Floratos et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112198 | Lohman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6128610 | Srinivasan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6158045 | You | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6212673 | House et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6219660 | Haderle et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6263332 | Nasr et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6278994 | Fuh et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282537 | Madnick et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6341281 | MacNicol et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6353821 | Gray | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6367034 | Novik et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6370537 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6389436 | Chakrabarti et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6397262 | Hayden et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6418448 | Sarkar | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6438540 | Nasr et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6438559 | White et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6439783 | Antoshenkov | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6449620 | Draper et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453314 | Chan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6507834 | Kabra et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6523102 | Dye et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6546381 | Subramanian et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6615203 | Lin et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6681343 | Nakabo | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6708186 | Claborn et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6718278 | Steggles | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6748386 | Li | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6751619 | Rowstron et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6766330 | Chen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6785677 | Fritchman | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6826566 | Lewak et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6836778 | Manikutty et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6850925 | Chaudhuri et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6856981 | Wyschogrod et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6985904 | Kaluskar et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6996557 | Leung et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7020696 | Perry et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7047249 | Vincent | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7051034 | Ghosh et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7062749 | Cyr et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7080062 | Leung et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7093023 | Lockwood et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7145938 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7146352 | Brundage et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7167848 | Boukouvalas et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7203927 | Al-Azzawe et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7224185 | Campbell et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7225188 | Gai et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7236972 | Lewak et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7305391 | Wyschogrod et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7308561 | Cornet et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7310638 | Blair | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7348981 | Buck | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7376656 | Blakeley et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7383253 | Tsimelzon et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7403959 | Nishizawa et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7430549 | Zane et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7451143 | Sharangpani et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7475058 | Kakivaya et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7483976 | Ross | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7516121 | Liu et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7519577 | Brundage et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7519962 | Aman | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7533087 | Liu et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7546284 | Martinez et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7552365 | Marsh et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7567953 | Kadayam et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7580946 | Mansour et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7587383 | Koo et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7603674 | Cyr et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7613848 | Amini et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7620851 | Leavy et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7630982 | Boyce et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7634501 | Yabloko | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7636703 | Taylor | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7644066 | Krishnaprasad et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7653645 | Stokes | Jan 2010 | B1 |
| 7672964 | Yan et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7673065 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7676461 | Chkodrov et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7689622 | Liu et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7693891 | Stokes et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7702629 | Cytron et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7702639 | Stanley et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7711782 | Kim et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7716210 | Ozcan et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7739265 | Jain et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7805445 | Boyer et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7814111 | Levin | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7818313 | Tsimelzon | Oct 2010 | B1 |
| 7823066 | Kuramura | Oct 2010 | B1 |
| 7827146 | De Landstheer et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7827190 | Pandya | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7844829 | Meenakshisundaram | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7870124 | Liu et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7870167 | Lu et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7877381 | Ewen et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7895187 | Bowman | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7912853 | Agrawal | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7917299 | Buhler et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7930322 | Maclennan | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7945540 | Park et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7953728 | Hu et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7954109 | Durham et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
| 7979420 | Jain et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7984043 | Waas | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7987204 | Stokes | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7988817 | Son | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7991766 | Srinivasan et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7996388 | Jain et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8019747 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8032544 | Jing et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8046747 | Cyr et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8073826 | Srinivasan et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8099400 | Haub et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8103655 | Srinivasan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8122006 | De Castro Alves et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8134184 | Becker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8145686 | Raman et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8145859 | Park et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8155880 | Patel et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8195648 | Zabback et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8204873 | Chavan | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8204875 | Srinivasan et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8260803 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8290776 | Moriwaki et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8296316 | Jain et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8307343 | Chaudhuri et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8315990 | Barga et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8316012 | Abouzied et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8321450 | Thatte et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8346511 | Schoning et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8352517 | Park et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8370812 | Feblowitz et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8386466 | Park et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8387076 | Thatte et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8392402 | Mihaila et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8396886 | Tsimelzon | Mar 2013 | B1 |
| 8447744 | Alves et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8458175 | Stokes | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8498956 | Srinivasan et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8521867 | Srinivasan et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8527458 | Park et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8543558 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8572589 | Cataldo et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8589436 | Srinivasan et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8676841 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8713049 | Jain et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8719207 | Ratnam et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8745070 | Krishnamurthy | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8762369 | Macho et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8775412 | Day et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 9058360 | De Castro Alves et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9098587 | Deshmukh et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9110945 | Jain | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9189280 | Park et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9244978 | Alves et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9256646 | Deshmukh et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9262258 | Alves et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9262479 | Deshmukh et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 20020023211 | Roth et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032804 | Hunt | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020038313 | Klein et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049788 | Lipkin et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020056004 | Smith et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020073399 | Golden | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116362 | Li et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116371 | Dodds et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133484 | Chau et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169788 | Lee et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030014408 | Robertson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030037048 | Kabra et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046673 | Copeland et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065655 | Syeda-mahmood | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065659 | Agarwal et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120682 | Bestgen et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135304 | Sroub et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200198 | Chandrasekar et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212664 | Breining et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229652 | Bakalash et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236766 | Fortuna et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040010496 | Behrendt et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040019592 | Crabtree | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040024773 | Stoffel et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064466 | Manikutty et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073534 | Robson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040088404 | Aggarwal | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117359 | Snodgrass et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040136598 | Le Leannec et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040151382 | Stellenberg et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153329 | Casati et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167864 | Wang et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040168107 | Sharp et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040177053 | Donoho et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040201612 | Hild et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205082 | Fontoura et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040220896 | Finlay et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040220912 | Manikutty et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040220927 | Murthy et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243590 | Gu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267760 | Brundage et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040268314 | Kollman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050010896 | Meliksetian et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055338 | Warner et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065949 | Warner et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096124 | Stronach | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097128 | Ryan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108368 | Mohan | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050120016 | Midgley | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154740 | Day et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050174940 | Iny | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177579 | Blakeley et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192921 | Chaudhuri et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050204340 | Ruminer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050229158 | Thusoo et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273352 | Moffat et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273450 | McMillen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289125 | Liu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060007308 | Ide et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015482 | Beyer et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060031204 | Liu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047696 | Larson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060064487 | Ross | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060080646 | Aman | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060085592 | Ganguly et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060089939 | Broda et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060100957 | Buttler et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060100969 | Wang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106786 | Day et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106797 | Srinivasa et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129554 | Suyama et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060155719 | Mihaeli et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167704 | Nicholls et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167856 | Angele et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212441 | Tang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224576 | Liu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060230029 | Yan | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235840 | Manikutty et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242180 | Graf et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282429 | Hernandez-Sherrington et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060294095 | Berk et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070016467 | John et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070022092 | Nishizawa et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070039049 | Kupferman et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070050340 | Von Kaenel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070076314 | Rigney | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118600 | Arora | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070136239 | Lee et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070136254 | Choi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156787 | MacGregor | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156964 | Sistla | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070192301 | Posner | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198479 | Cai et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070214171 | Behnen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070226188 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070226239 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070271280 | Chandasekaran | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070294217 | Chen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080005093 | Liu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080010093 | LaPlante et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080010241 | McGoveran | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080016095 | Bhatnagar et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080028095 | Lang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033914 | Cherniack et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080034427 | Cadambi et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080046401 | Lee et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071904 | Schuba et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080077570 | Tang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080077587 | Wyschogrod et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080077780 | Zingher | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082484 | Averbuch et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082514 | Khorlin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080086321 | Walton | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080098359 | Ivanov et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080110397 | Son | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080114787 | Kashiyama et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080120283 | Liu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080120321 | Liu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080162583 | Brown et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080195577 | Fan et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080235298 | Lin et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243451 | Feblowitz et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243675 | Parsons et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250073 | Nori et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255847 | Moriwaki et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080263039 | Van Lunteren | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080270764 | McMillen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080281782 | Agrawal | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080301086 | Gupta | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080301124 | Alves et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080301125 | Alves et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080301135 | Alves et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080301256 | McWilliams et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080313131 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090006320 | Ding et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090006346 | C N et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090007098 | Chevrette et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090019045 | Amir et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090024622 | Chkodrov et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090043729 | Liu et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090070355 | Cadarette et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090070785 | Alvez et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090070786 | Alves et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090076899 | Gbodimowo | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090088962 | Jones | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090100029 | Jain et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106189 | Jain et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106190 | Srinivasan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106198 | Srinivasan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106214 | Jain et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106215 | Jain et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106218 | Srinivasan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106321 | Das et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106440 | Srinivasan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090112802 | Srinivasan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090112803 | Srinivasan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090112853 | Nishizawa et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125550 | Barga et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125916 | Lu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132503 | Sun et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090133041 | Rahman et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090144696 | Andersen | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090172014 | Huetter | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090182779 | Johnson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090187584 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090192981 | Papaemmanouil et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216747 | Li et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216860 | Li et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222730 | Wixson et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228431 | Dunagan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228434 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090245236 | Scott et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090248749 | Gu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254522 | Chaudhuri et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090257314 | Davis et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090265324 | Mordvinov et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090271529 | Kashiyama et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090282021 | Bennet et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090293046 | Cheriton | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090300093 | Griffiths et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090300181 | Marques | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090300580 | Heyhoe et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090300615 | Andrade et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090313198 | Kudo et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319501 | Goldstein et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327102 | Maniar et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327257 | Abouzeid et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100017379 | Naibo et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017380 | Naibo et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023498 | Dettinger et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100036803 | Vemuri et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100036831 | Vemuri | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049710 | Young, Jr. et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057663 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057727 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057735 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057736 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057737 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100094838 | Kozak | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100106710 | Nishizawa | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100106946 | Imaki et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125574 | Navas | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125584 | Navas | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138405 | Mihaila | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100161589 | Nica et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223305 | Park et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223437 | Park et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223606 | Park et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100250572 | Chen | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100293135 | Candea et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312756 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318652 | Samba | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100332401 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110004621 | Kelley et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110016160 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110022618 | Thatte et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110023055 | Thatte et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029484 | Park et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029485 | Park et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110040746 | Handa et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110055192 | Tang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110055197 | Chavan | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110093162 | Nielsen et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110105857 | Zhang et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161321 | De Castro et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161328 | Park et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161352 | De Castro et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161356 | De Castro et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161397 | Bekiares et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110173231 | Drissi et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110173235 | Aman et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110178775 | Schoning et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110196839 | Smith et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110196891 | De Castro et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110246445 | Mishra | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110270879 | Srinivasan et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282812 | Chandramouli et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110302164 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110313844 | Chandramouli et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110314019 | Jimenez Peris et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110321057 | Mejdrich et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120016866 | Dunagan | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120041934 | Srinivasan et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120072455 | Jain et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120130963 | Luo et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120131139 | Siripurapu et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120166417 | Chandramouli et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120166421 | Cammert et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120166469 | Cammert et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120191697 | Sherman et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233107 | Roesch et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120259910 | Andrade et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120278473 | Griffiths | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284420 | Shukla et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120290715 | Dinger et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120291049 | Park et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120324453 | Chandramouli et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130014088 | Park et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130031567 | Nano et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130046725 | Cammert et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130117317 | Wolf | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130144866 | Jerzak et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130191370 | Chen et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130262399 | Eker et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130332240 | Patri et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140082013 | Wolf et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095444 | Deshmukh et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095445 | Deshmukh et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095446 | Deshmukh et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095447 | Deshmukh et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095462 | Park et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095471 | Deshmukh et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095473 | Srinivasan et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095483 | Toillion et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095525 | Hsiao et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095529 | Deshmukh et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095533 | Shukla et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095535 | Deshmukh et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095537 | Park et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095540 | Hsiao et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095541 | Herwadkar et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095543 | Hsiao et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140136514 | Jain et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140156683 | de Castro Alves | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140172506 | Parsell et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140172914 | Elnikety et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201225 | Deshmukh et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201355 | Bishnoi et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140236983 | Alves et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140237289 | de Castro Alves et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140379712 | Lafuente Alvarez | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150156241 | Shukla et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150161214 | Kali et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150227415 | Alves et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150363464 | Alves et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150381712 | De Castro Alves et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160034311 | Park et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 104885077 | Sep 2015 | CN |
| 104937591 | Sep 2015 | CN |
| 1241589 | Sep 2002 | EP |
| 2474922 | Jul 2012 | EP |
| 2946314 | Nov 2015 | EP |
| 2946527 | Nov 2015 | EP |
| 2959408 | Dec 2015 | EP |
| 2002-251233 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2007-328716 | Dec 2007 | JP |
| 2008-541225 | Nov 2008 | JP |
| 2009-134689 | Jun 2009 | JP |
| 2010-108073 | May 2010 | JP |
| 2011-039818 | Feb 2011 | JP |
| 2015536001 | Dec 2015 | JP |
| 2016500167 | Jan 2016 | JP |
| 0049533 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO0049533 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| 0118712 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| 0159602 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 0165418 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| 03030031 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| 2007122347 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO2009119811 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2012037511 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| 2012050582 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| 2012154408 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012158360 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2015191120 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,437, Notice of Allowance mailed on Jul. 10, 2013, 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,281, Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 10, 2013, 21 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,290, Notice of Allowance mailed on Sep. 11, 2013, 6 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/193,377, Notice of Allowance mailed on Aug. 30, 2013, 19 pages. |
| Oracle™ Fusion Middleware CQL Language Reference, 11g Release 1 (11.1.1.6.3) E12048-10, Aug. 2012, pp. 6-1 to 6-12. |
| Oracle™ Complex Event Processing CQL Language Reference, 11g Release 1 (11.1.1.4.0) E12048-04, Jan. 2011, pp. pp. 6.1 to 6.12. |
| Oracle™ Complex Event Processing CQL Language Reference, 11g Release 1 (11.1.1) E12048-03, Apr. 2010, sections 18-4 to 18.4.2. |
| Pattern Recognition With MATCH—RECOGNIZE, Oracle™ Complex Event Processing CQL Language Reference, 11g Release 1 (11.1.1) E12048-03, May 2009, pp. 15.1 to 15.20. |
| Supply Chain Event Management: Real-Time Supply Chain Event Management, product information Manhattan Associates, 2009-2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/601,415, Non-Final Office mailed on Dec. 11, 2013, 58 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/396,464, Non Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 31, 2013, 16 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/089,556, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jan. 9, 2014, 14 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,187 dated Feb. 6, 2014, 53 pages. |
| Agrawal et al. “Efficient pattern matching over event streams,” Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pp. 147-160 (Jun. 2008). |
| Arasu et al., An Abstract Semantics and Concrete Language for Continuous Queries over Streams and Relations, 9th International Workshop on Database programming languages, Sep. 2003, 12 pages. |
| Chandramouli et al., High-Performance Dynamic Pattern Matching over Disordered Streams, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 3 Issue 1-2, Sep. 2010, pp. 220-231. |
| Chapple “Combining Query Results with the UNION Command,” ask.com Computing Databases, downloaded from: http://databases.about.com/od/sql/a/union.htm (no date, printed on Oct. 14, 2013). |
| Chui, WebSphere Application Server V6.1—Class loader problem determination, IBM.com, 2007. |
| Fantozzi, A Strategic Approach to Supply Chain Event Management, student submission for Masters Degree, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun. 2003. |
| Komazec et al., Towards Efficient Schema-Enhanced Pattern Matching over RDF Data Streams, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Ordering and Reasoning (OrdRing 2011), Bonn, Germany, Oct. 2011. |
| Ogrodnek, Custom UDFs and hive, Bizo development blog http://dev.bizo.com, Jun. 23, 2009, 2 pages. |
| Pradhan, Implementing and Configuring SAP® Event Management, Galileo Press, 2010, pp. 17-21. |
| Wilson et al., SAP Event Management, an Overview, Q Data USA, Inc., 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,259, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Unpublished, Bishnoi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/839,288, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Unpublished, Bishnoi et al. |
| Call User Defined Functions from Pig, Amazon Elastic MapReduce, Mar. 2009, 2 pages. |
| Strings in C, retrieved from the internet: <URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20070612231205/http:l/web.cs.swarthmore.edu/-newhall/unixhelp/C—strings.html> [retrieved on May 13, 2014], Swarthmore College, Jun. 12, 2007, 3 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,197, Notice of Allowance mailed on Jun. 22, 2012, 20 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/396,464, Final Office Action mailed on May 16, 2014, 16 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,187, Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 4, 2014, 64 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/089,556, Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 13, 2014, 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/107,742, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 19, 2014, 20 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/244,272, Notice of Allowance mailed on Aug. 12, 2013, 12 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2011/052019, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed on Mar. 28, 2013, 6 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2012/034970, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed on Nov. 21, 2013, 7 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2012/036353, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed on Nov. 28, 2013, 6 pages. |
| Bottom-up parsing, Wikipedia, downloaded from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bottom-up—parsing, Sep. 8, 2014, pp. 1-2. |
| Branch Predication, Wikipedia, downloaded from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Branch—predication, Sep. 8, 2014, pp. 1-4. |
| Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 5th Edition, Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA, ©, 2002, pp. 238-239 and 529. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/089,556 dated Oct. 6, 2014, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/396,464, Notice of Allowance mailed on Sep. 3, 2014, 7 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,187, Advisory Action mailed on Sep. 26, 2014, 6 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,281, Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 13, 2014, 19 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/913,636, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jul. 24, 2014, 22 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,201, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jul. 30, 2014, 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/764,560, Non Final Office Action mailed on Sep. 12, 2014, 23 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,969, Non Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 7, 2014, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/302,031, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 27, 2014, 19 pages. |
| Abadi et al., Aurora: a new model and architecture for data stream management, the VLDB Journal the International Journal on very large data bases, vol. 12, No. 2, Aug. 1, 2003, pp. 120-139. |
| Balkesen et al., Scalable Data Partitioning Techniques for Parallel Sliding Window Processing over Data Streams, 8th International Workshop on Data Management for Sensor Networks, Aug. 29, 2011, pp. 1-6. |
| Chandrasekaran et al., PSoup: a system for streaming queries over streaming data, The VLDB Journal, The International Journal on very large data bases, vol. 12, No. 2, Aug. 1, 2003, pp. 140-156. |
| Dewson, Beginning SOL Server 2008 for Developers: From Novice to Professional, A Press, Berkeley, CA, 2008, pp. 337-349 and 418-438. |
| Harish et al., Identifying robust plans through plan diagram reduction, PVLDB '08, Auckland, New Zealand, Aug. 23-28, 2008, pp. 1124-1140. |
| Krämer, Continuous Queries Over Data Streams—Semantics and Implementation, Fachbereich Mathematik und Informatik der Philipps-Universitat, Marburg, Germany, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://archiv.ub.uni-marburg.de/dissjz007/0671/pdfjdjk.pdf, Jan. 1, 2007; 313 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2013/062047, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 16, 2014, 12 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2013/062050, International Search Report & Written Opinion mailed on Jul. 2, 2014, 13 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2013/062052, International Search Report & Written Opinion mailed on Jul. 3, 2014, 12 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2013/073086, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 14, 2014. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2014/017061, International Search Report mailed on Sep. 9, 2014, 4 pages. |
| Rao et al., Compiled Query Execution Engine using JVM, ICDE '06, Atlanta, GA, Apr. 3-7, 2006, 12 pages. |
| Ray et al., Optimizing complex sequence pattern extraction using caching, data engineering workshops (ICDEW)˜2011 IEEE 27th international conference on IEEE, Apr. 11, 2011, pp. 243-248. |
| Shah et al., Flux: an adaptive partitioning operator for continuous query systems, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Data Engineering, Mar. 5-8, 2003, pp. 25-36. |
| Stillger et al., LEO—DB2's LEarning Optimizer, Proc. of the VLDB, Roma, Italy, Sep. 2001, pp. 19-28. |
| Oracle Application Server, Enterprise Deployment Guide, 10g Release 3 (10.1.3.2.0), B32125-02, Oracle, Apr. 2007, 120 pages. |
| Oracle Database, SQL Language Reference 11 g Release 1 (11.1), B28286-02, Oracle, Sep. 2007, 1496 pages. |
| Esper Reference Documentation, Copyright 2007, Ver. 1.12.0, 2007, 158 pages. |
| Stream Query Repository: Online Auctions, Retrieved from URL: http://www.db.stanford.edu/stream/sqr/onauc.html#queryspecsend, Dec. 2, 2002, 2 pages. |
| Esper Reference Documentation, Copyright 2008, ver. 2.0.0, 2008, 202 pages. |
| Oracle Database Data Cartridge Developer's Guide, B28425-03, 11 g Release 1 (11.1), Oracle, Mar. 2008, 372 pages. |
| Oracle Application Server, Administrator's Guide, 10g Release 3 (10.1.3.2.0), B32196-01, Oracle, Jan. 2007, 376 pages. |
| Oracle Application Server 10g, Release 2 and 3, New Features Overview, An Oracle White Paper, Oracle, Oct. 2005, 48 pages. |
| Oracle Database, SQL Reference, 10g Release 1 (10.1), Part No. B10759-01, Dec. 2003, pp. 7-1 to 7-17; 7-287 to 7-290; 14-61 to 14-74. |
| Business Process Management (BPM), Datasheet [online]. IBM, [retrieved on Jan. 28, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www-142.ibm.com/software/products/us/en/category/BPM-SOFTWARE>. |
| Complex Event Processing in the Real World, An Oracle White Paper, Sep. 2007, 13 pages. |
| Coral8 Complex Event Processing Technology Overview, Coral8, Inc., Make it Continuous, Copyright 2007 Coral8, Inc., 2007, 1-8 pages. |
| Creating WebLogic Domains Using the Configuration Wizard, BEA Products, Version 10.0, Dec. 2007, 78 pages. |
| Creating Weblogic Event Server Applications, BEA WebLogic Event Server, Version. 2.0, Jul. 2007, 90 pages. |
| Dependency Injection, Dec. 30, 2008, pp. 1-7. |
| Deploying Applications to WebLogic Server, Mar. 30, 2007, 164 pages. |
| Developing Applications with Weblogic Server, Mar. 30, 2007, 254 pages. |
| EPL Reference, Jul. 2007, 82 pages. |
| Esper Reference Documentation Version 3.1.0, EsperTech, retrieved from internet at URL: http://esper.codehaus.org/esper-3.1.0/doc/reference/en/pdf/esper—reference.pdf, 2009, 293 pages. |
| Fast Track Deployment and Administrator Guide for BEA WebLogic Server, BEA WebLogic Server 10.0 Documentation, printed on May 10, 2010, at URL: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E1322201 /wls/docs100/quickstart/quick—start.html , May 10, 2010, 1 page. |
| Getting Started with WebLogic Event Server, BEA WebLogic Event Server version 2.0, Jul. 2007, 66 pages. |
| High Availability Guide, Oracle Application Server, 10g Release 3 (10.1.3.2.0), B32201-01, Jan. 2007, 314 pages. |
| Installing Weblogic Real Time, BEA WebLogic Real Time, Ver. 2.0, Jul. 2007, 64 pages. |
| Introduction to BEA WebLogic Server and BEA WebLogic Express, BEA WebLogic Server, Ver. 10.0, Mar. 2007, 34 pages. |
| Introduction to WebLogic Real Time, Jul. 2007, 20 pages. |
| Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3 Getting Started Guide CP03, for Use with Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3 Cumulative Patch 3, Jboss a division of Red Hat, Red Hat Documentation Group, Copyright 2008, Red Hat, Inc., Sep. 2007, 68 pages. |
| Managing Server Startup and Shutdown, BEA WebLogic Server, version 10.0, Mar. 30, 2007, 134 pages. |
| Matching Behavior, NET Framework Developer's Guide, Microsoft Corporation, Retrieved on: Jul. 1, 2008, URL: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/Oyzc2ybO (printer) aspx, 2008, pp. 1-2. |
| New Project Proposal for Row Pattern Recognition—Amendment to SQL with Application to Streaming Data Queries, H2-2008-027 , H2 Teleconference Meeting, Jan. 9, 2008, pp. 1-6. |
| Oracle CEP Getting Started, Release 11 gR1 (11.1.1) E14476-01, May 2009, 172 pages. |
| Oracle Complex Event Processing CQL Language Reference, 1g Release 1 (11.1.1) E12048-01, Apr. 2010, 540 pages. |
| OSGI Service Platform Core Specification, The OSGI Alliance, OSGI Alliance, Apr. 2007, 288 pages. |
| Release Notes, BEA WebLogic Event Server, Ver. 2.0, Jul. 2007, 8 pages. |
| SQL Tutorial-In, Tizag.com, http://web.archive.org/web/20090216215219/http://www.tizag.com/sgiTutorial/sqlin.php, Feb. 16, 2009, pp. 1-3. |
| Spring Dynamic Modules for OSGi Service Platforms product documentation, Jan. 2008, 71 pages. |
| Stream Base New and Noteworthy, Stream Base, Jan. 12, 2010, 878 pages. |
| Stream: The Stanford Stream Data Manager, Retrieved from: URL: http://infolab.stanford.edu/stream/, Jan. 5, 2006, pp. 1-9. |
| The Stanford Stream Data Manager, IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, Mar. 2003, pp. 1-8. |
| Understanding Domain Configuration, BEA WebLogic Server, Ver. 10.0, Mar. 30, 2007, 38 pages. |
| WebLogic Event Server Administration and Configuration Guide, BEA WebLogic Event D Server, Version. 2.0, Jul. 2007, 108 pages. |
| WebLogic Event Server Reference, BEA WebLogic Event Server, Version. 2.0, Jul. 2007, 52 pages. |
| Weblogic Server Performance and Tuning, BEA WebLogic Server, Ver. 10.0, Mar. 30, 2007, 180 pages. |
| WebSphere Application Server V6.1 Problem Determination: IBM Redpaper Collection, Dec. 2007, 634 pages. |
| What is BPM? , Datasheet [online]. IBM, [retrieved on Jan. 28, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www-01.ibm.com/software/info/bpm/whatis-bpm/>. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,523, Final Office Action mailed on Jul. 6, 2007, 37 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,523, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 11, 2007, 48 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,523, Notice of Allowance mailed on Dec. 1, 2010, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,523, Notice of Allowance mailed on Jul. 8, 2008, 28 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,523, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jan. 22, 2007, 32 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,523, Supplemental Notice of Allowance mailed on Jul. 17, 2008, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,523, Supplemental Notice of Allowance, mailed on Aug. 25, 2008, 3 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/601,415, Advisory Action mailed on Aug. 18, 2009, 3 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/601,415, Final Office Action mailed on May 27, 2009, 27 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/601,415, Final Office Action mailed on Jul. 2, 2012, 59 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/601,415, Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 30, 2010, 45 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/601,415, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Sep. 17, 2008, 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/601,415, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Nov. 30, 2009, 32 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/601,415, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 9, 2011. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/873,407, Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 26, 2010, 11 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/873,407, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Nov. 13, 2009, 7 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/873,407, Notice of Allowance mailed on Nov. 10, 2010, 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/873,407, Notice of Allowance mailed on Mar. 7, 2011, 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,197, Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 12, 2011, 26 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,197, Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 29, 2010, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,197, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 22, 2010, 22 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,197, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Nov. 10, 2009, 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,202, Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 8, 2010, 200 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,202, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 3, 2009, 20 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,202, Notice of Allowance mailed on Mar. 31, 2011, 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,202, Notice of Allowance mailed on Dec. 22, 2010, 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,850, Notice of Allowance mailed on Jan. 27, 2010, 11 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,850, Notice of Allowance mailed on Nov. 24, 2009, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,850, Notice of Allowance mailed on Dec. 11, 2009, 5 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,896, Final Office Action mailed on Jul. 23, 2010, 28 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,896, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 8, 2009, 19 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,896, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Nov. 22, 2010, 25 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,896, Notice of Allowance mailed on Jun. 23, 2011, 30 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/927,681, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 24, 2011, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/927,681, Notice of Allowance mailed on Jul. 1, 2011, 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/927,683, Final Office Action mailed on Sep. 1, 2011, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/927,683, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 24, 2011, 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/927,683, Notice of Allowance mailed on Nov. 9, 2011, 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,437, Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 8, 2010, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,437, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 13, 2009, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,437, Notice of Allowance mailed on Mar. 4, 2013, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,437, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 3, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,439, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 13, 2010, 7 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,439, Notice of Allowance mailed on Mar. 16, 2011, 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,439, Notice of Allowance mailed on Aug. 18, 2010, 11 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,439, Notice of Allowance mailed on Sep. 28, 2010, 6 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,439, Notice of Allowance mailed on Nov. 24, 2010, 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,440, Notice of Allowance mailed on Oct. 7, 2009, 6 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/193,377, Final Office Action mailed on Jan. 17, 2013, 24 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/395,871, Non-Final Office Action mailed on May 27, 2011, 7 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/395,871, Notice of Allowance mailed on May 4, 2012, 27 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/395,871, Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 19, 2011, 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/396,008, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 8, 2011, 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/396,008, Notice of Allowance mailed on Nov. 16, 2011, 5 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/396,464, Final Office Action mailed on Jan. 16, 2013, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/396,464, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Sep. 7, 2012, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,891, Notice of Allowance mailed on Jul. 25, 2012, 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,891, Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 2011, 41 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,905, Advisory Action mailed Nov. 6, 2012, 6 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,905, Notice of Allowance mailed on Dec. 14, 2012, 15 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,905, Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 9, 2012, 42 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,905, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 26, 2012, 86 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/534,384, Notice of Allowance mailed on May 7, 2013, 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/534,384, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Feb. 28, 2012, 38 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/534,384, Final Office Action mailed on Feb. 12, 2013, 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/534,398, Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 5, 2012, 27 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/534,398, Notice of Allowance mailed on Nov. 27, 2012, 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/534,398, Office Action mailed on Nov. 1, 2011, 32 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,187, Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 10, 2013, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,187, Non Final Office Action mailed on Sep. 27, 2011, 19 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,187, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 9, 2013, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,187, Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 20, 2012, 31 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,209, Notice of Allowance mailed on Oct. 24, 2012, 22 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,209, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 16, 2012, 40 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,222, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 10, 2013, 16 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,222, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 19, 2011, 19 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,222, Notice of Allowance mailed on Jul. 18, 2013, 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,222, Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 20, 2012, 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,281, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 12, 2013, 16 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,281, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 3, 2011, 20 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,281, Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 20, 2012, 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,290, Final Office Action mailed on Jul. 30, 2012, 34 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,290, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 3, 2011, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,290, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 15, 2013, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/874,197, Notice of Allowance mailed on Jun. 22, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/913,636, Final Office Action mailed on Jan. 8, 2013, 21 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/913,636, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 7, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,081, Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 27, 2013, 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,081, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jan. 9, 2013, 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,194, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 7, 2012, 11 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,194, Notice of Allowance mailed on Mar. 20, 2013, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,201, Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 25, 2013, 11 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,201, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 19, 2012, 15 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/089,556, Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 29, 2013, 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/089,556, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 10, 2013, 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/089,556, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Nov. 6, 2012, 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,665, Final Office Action mailed on Jul. 9, 2013, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,665, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Feb. 1, 2013, 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/107,742, Final Office Action mailed on Jul. 3, 2013, 19 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/107,742, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Feb. 14, 2013, 16 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,037, Non Final Office action mailed on May 1, 2013, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/177,748, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 30, 2013, 24 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,528, Notice of Allowance mailed on Mar. 1, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/193,377, Final Office Action mailed on Jan. 17, 2013, 25 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/193,377, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 23, 2012, 48 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/244,272, Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 28, 2013, 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/244,272, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 4, 2012, 30 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/396,464, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Sep. 7, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/546,235, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jul. 8, 2013, 13 pages. |
| Abadi et al., Yes Aurora: A Data Stream Management System, International Conference on Management of Data, Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 2003, 4 pages. |
| Aho et al., Efficient String Matching: An Aid to Bibliographic Search, Communications of the ACM, vol. 18, No. 6, Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., Jun. 1975, pp. 333-340. |
| Arasu et al., An Abstract Semantics and Concrete Language for Continuous Queries over Streams and Relations, 9th International Workshop on Database programming languages, Sep. 2003, 11 pages. |
| Arasu et al., CQL: A language for Continuous Queries over Streams and Relations, Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 2921, 2004, pp. 1-19. |
| Arasu et al., STREAM: The Stanford Data Stream Management System, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, 2004, p. 21. |
| Arasu et al., The CQL Continuous Query Language: Semantic Foundations and Query Execution, Stanford University, The VLDB Journal—The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases, vol. 15, No. 2, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Jun. 2006, pp. 1-32. |
| Avnur et al., Eddies: Continuously Adaptive Query Processing, In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Data, Dallas TX, May 2000, 12 pages. |
| Avnur et al., Eddies: Continuously Adaptive Query Processing, 2007, 4 pages. |
| Babcock et al., Models and Issues in Data Streams, Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIDART symposium on Principles database systems, 2002, 30 pages. |
| Babu et al., Continuous Queries over Data Streams, SIGMOD Record, vol. 30, No. 3, Sep. 2001, pp. 109-120. |
| Bai et al., A Data Stream Language and System Designed for Power and Extensibility, Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings of the 15th ACM D International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Arlington, Virginia, Copyright 2006, ACM Press., Nov. 5-11, 2006, 10 pages. |
| Bose et al., A Query Algebra for Fragmented XML Stream Data, 9th International Conference on Data Base Programming Languages (DBPL), Sep. 2003, 11 pages. |
| Buza , Extension of CQL over Dynamic Databases, Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 12, No. 9, Sep. 28, 2006, pp. 1165-1176. |
| Carpenter, User Defined Functions, Retrieved from: URL: http://www.sqlteam.comitemprint.asp?ItemID=979, Oct. 12, 2000, 4 pages. |
| Chan et al., Efficient Filtering of XML documents with Xpath expressions, 2002, pp. 354-379. |
| Chan Drasekaran et al., TelegraphCQ: Continuous Dataflow Processing for an UncertainWorld, Proceedings of CIDR, 2003, 12 pages. |
| Chen et al., NiagaraCQ: A Scalable Continuous Query System for Internet Databases, Proceedings of the 2000 SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, May 2000, pp. 379-390. |
| Colyer et al., Spring Dynamic Modules Reference Guide, Copyright, ver. 1.0.3, 2006-2008, 73 pages. |
| Colyer et al., Spring Dynamic Modules Reference Guide, Ver. 1.1.3, 2006-2008, 96 pages. |
| Conway, An Introduction to Data Stream Query Processing, Truviso, Inc., May 24, 2007, 71 pages. |
| Demers et al., Towards Expressive Publish/Subscribe Systems, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT 2006), Munich, Germany, Mar. 2006, pp. 1-18. |
| Demichiel et al., JSR 220: Enterprise JavaBeans™, EJB 3.0 Simplified API, EJB 3.0 Expert Group, Sun Microsystems, Ver. 3.0, May 2, 2006, 59 pages. |
| Deshpande et al., Adaptive Query Processing, Slide show believed to be prior to Oct. 17, 2007, Oct. 17, 2007, 27 pages. |
| Diao et al., Query Processing for High-Volume XML Message Brokering, Proceedings of the 29th VLDB Conference, Berlin, Germany, 2003, 12 pages. |
| Diao, Query Processing for Large-Scale XML Message Brokering, University of California Berkeley, 2005, 226 pages. |
| Dindar et al., Event Processing Support for Cross-Reality Environments, Pervasive Computing, IEEE CS, Jul.-Sep. 2009, Copyright 2009, IEEE, Jul.-Sep. 2009, pp. 2-9. |
| Fernandez et al., Build your own XQuery processor, slide show, at URL: http://www.galaxquery.org/slides/edbt-summer-school2004.pdf , 2004, 116 pages. |
| Fernandez et al., Implementing XQuery 1.0: The Galax Experience, Proceedings of the 29th VLDB Conference, Berlin, Germany, 2003, 4 pages. |
| Florescu et al., The BEA/XQRL Streaming XQuery Processor, Proceedings of the 29th VLDB Conference, 2003, 12 pages. |
| Gilani, Design and implementation of stream operators, query instantiator and stream buffer manager, Dec. 2003, 137 pages. |
| Golab et al., Issues in Data Stream Management, ACM SIGMOD Record, vol. 32, issue 2, ACM Press, Jun. 2003, pp. 5-14. |
| Golab et al., Sliding Window Query Processing Over Data Streams, Aug. 2006, 182 pages. |
| Gosling et al., The Java Language Specification, 1996-2005, 684 pages. |
| Hao et al., Achieving high performance web applications by service and database replications at edge servers, Performance Computing and communications conference(IPCCC) IEEE 28th International, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2009, pp. 153-160. |
| Hopcroft , Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, Second Edition, Addison-Wesley, Copyright 2001, 524 pages. |
| Hulten et al., Mining Time-Changing Data Stream, Proceedings of the Seventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Aug. 2001, 10 pages. |
| Jin et al., ARGUS: Efficient Scalable Continuous Query Optimization for Large-Volume Data Streams, 10th International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium (IDEAS'06), 2006, 7 pages. |
| Kawaguchi et al. “Java Architecture for XML Binding (JAXB) 2.2”, Sun Microsystems, Inc., Dec. 10, 2009, 384 pages. |
| Knuth et al., Fast Pattern Matching in Strings, Siam J Comput., vol. 6, No. 2, Jun. 1977, pp. 323-350. |
| Lakshmanan et al., On efficient matching of streaming XML documents and queries, 2002, 18 pages. |
| Lindholm et al., Java Virtual Machine Specification, 2nd Edition Prentice Hall, Apr. 1999, 484 pages. |
| Liu et al., Efficient XSLT Processing in Relational Database System, Proceeding of the 32nd. International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), Sep. 2006, pp. 1106-1116. |
| Luckham, What's the Difference Between ESP and CEP? , Complex Event Processing, downloaded at URL: http://complexevents.com/?p=103, Apr. 29, 2011, 5 pages. |
| Madden et al., Continuously Adaptive Continuous Queries (CACQ) over Streams, SIGMOD 2002, Jun. 4-6, 2002, 12 pages. |
| Martin et al., Finding Application Errors and Security Flaws Using PQL, a Program Query Language, OOPSLA'05, Oct. 16, 2005, pp. 1-19. |
| Motwani et al., Query Processing Resource Management, and Approximation in a Data Stream Management System, Jan. 2003, 12 pages. |
| Munagala et al., Optimization of Continuous Queries with Shared Expensive Filters, Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, Oct. 17, 2007, 14 pages. |
| Nah et al., A Cluster-Based TMO-Structured Scalable Approach for Location Information Systems, Object-Oriented Real-Time Dependable Systems, 2003. WORDS 2003 Fall. Proceedings. Ninth IEEE International Workshop on Date of Conference: Oct. 1-3, 2003, Jan. 1, 2003, pp. 225-233. |
| Novick, Creating a User Defined Aggregate with SQL Server 2005, URL: http://novicksoftware.com/Articles/sql-2005-product-user-defined-aggregate.html , 2005, 6 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2011/052019, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Nov. 17, 2011, 55 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2012/034970, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Jul. 16, 2012, 13 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2012/036353, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Sep. 12, 2012, 11 pages. |
| Peng et al., Xpath Queries on Streaming Data, 2003, pp. 1-12. |
| Peterson, Petri Net Theory and the Modeling of Systems, Prentice Hall, 1981, 301 pages. |
| PostgresSQL, Manuals: PostgresSQL 8.2: Create Aggregate, believed to be prior to Apr. 21, 2007, 4 pages. |
| PostgresSQL, Documentation: Manuals: PostgresSQL 8.2: User-Defined Aggregates believed D to be prior to Apr. 21, 2007, 4 pages. |
| Sadri et al., Expressing and Optimizing Sequence Queries in Database Systems, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol. 29, No. 2, ACM Press, Copyright 2004, Jun. 2004, pp. 282-318. |
| Sadtler et al., WebSphere Application Server Installation Problem Determination, Copyright 2007, IBM Corp., 2007, pp. 1-48. |
| Sansoterra, Empower SQL with Java User-Defined Functions, ITJungle.com, Oct. 9, 2003, 9 pages. |
| Sharaf et al., Efficient Scheduling of Heterogeneous Continuous Queries, VLDB '06, Sep. 12-15, 2006, pp. 511-522. |
| Stolze et al., User-defined Aggregate Functions in DB2 Universal Database, Retrieved from: http://www.128.ibm.com/deve10perworks/d b2/library/tachartic1e/0309stolze/0309stolze.html, Sep. 11, 2003, 11 pages. |
| Stump et al., Proceedings, The 2006 Federated Logic Conference, IJCAR '06 Workshop, PLPV '06: Programming Languages meets Program Verification, 2006, pp. 1-113. |
| Terry et al., Continuous queries over append-only database, Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD, 1992, pp. 321-330. |
| Ullman et al., Introduction to JDBC, Stanford University, 2005, 7 pages. |
| Vajjhala et al., The Java, Architecture for XML Binding (JAXB) 2.0, Apr. 19, 2006, 384 pages. |
| Vijayalakshmi et al., Processing location dependent continuous queries in distributed mobile databases using mobile agents, IET-UK International Conference on Information and Communication Technology in Electrical Sciences (ICTES 2007), Dec. 22, 2007, pp. 1023-1030. |
| W3C, XML Path Language (Xpath), W3C Recommendation, Version. 1.0, Retrieved from URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath , Nov. 16, 1999, 37 pages. |
| Wang et al., Distributed continuous range query processing on moving objects, DEXA'06 Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2006, pp. 655-665. |
| White et al., WebLogic Event Server: A Lightweight, Modular Application Server for Event Processing, 2nd International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems, Rome, Italy, Copyright 2004, Jul. 2-4, 2008, 8 pages. |
| Widom et al., CQL: A Language for Continuous Queries over Streams and Relations mailed on Oct. 17, 2007, 62 pages. |
| Widom et al., The Stanford Data Stream Management System, PowerPoint Presentation, Oct. 17, 2007, 110 pages. |
| Wu et al., Dynamic Data Management for Location Based Services in Mobile Environments, Database Engineering and Applications Symposium, Jul. 16, 2003, pp. 172-181. |
| Zemke, XML Query, Mar. 14, 2004, 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,281, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Feb. 13, 2014, 16 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/177,748, Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 20, 2014, 23 pages. |
| PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/010832, International Search Report mailed on Apr. 3, 2014, 9 pages. |
| Cadonna et al., Efficient event pattern matching with match windows, Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (Aug. 2012), pp. 471-479. |
| Nichols et al., A faster closure algorithm for pattern matching in partial-order event data, IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (Dec. 2007), pp. 1-9. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,081, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jan. 28, 2015, 20 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,201, Notice of Allowance mailed on Jan. 21, 2015, 5 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/107,742, Final Office Action mailed on Jan. 21, 2015, 23 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/177,748, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Feb. 3, 2015, 22 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,961, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Feb. 4, 2015, 22 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,969, Notice of Allowance mailed on Jan. 22, 2015, 5 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,958, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 11, 2014, 15 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2014/010832, Written Opinion mailed on Dec. 15, 2014, 5 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2014/010920, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Dec. 15, 2014, 10 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2014/017061, Written Opinion mailed on Feb. 3, 2015, 6 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2014/039771, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Sep. 24, 2014, 12 pages. |
| Cranor et al. “Gigascope: a stream database for network applications,” Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pp. 647-651 (Jun. 2003). |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,378 dated Feb. 25, 2015, 23 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,129 dated Feb. 27, 2015, 19 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2014/068641, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Feb. 26, 2015, 11 pages. |
| European Patent Application No. 12783063.6, Extended Search Report mailed Mar. 24, 2015, 6 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/913,636 dated Apr. 1, 2015, 22 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/827,631 dated Apr. 3, 2015, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/839,288 dated Apr. 3, 2015, 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,187 dated Aug. 17, 2015, 18 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/107,742 dated Jul. 8, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Actio for U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,072 dated Jul. 9, 2015, 12 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,502 dated Jun. 30, 2015, 25 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,659 dated Aug. 13, 2015, 33 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,759 dated Aug. 7, 2015, 23 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/302,031 dated Apr. 22, 2015, 23 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,674 dated Jun. 5, 2015, 22 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,171 dated Jun. 3, 2015, 15 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/830,735 dated May 26, 2015, 19 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,428 dated Jun. 4, 2015, 21 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/838,259 dated Jun. 9, 2015, 37 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,153 dated Jun. 19, 2015, 23 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,958 dated Jun. 19, 2015, 17 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/827,987 dated Jun. 19, 2015, 10 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2014/039771, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Apr. 29, 2015 6 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2015/016346, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on May 4, 2015, 9 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 9, 2015 for PCT/US2013/062047, 10 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 9, 2015 for PCT/US2013/062052, 18 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 28, 2015 for PCT/US2014/017061, 31 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 18, 2015 for PCT/US2013/073086, 7 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/079,538 dated Oct. 22, 2015, 34 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/302,031 dated Nov. 3, 2015, 18 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,081 dated Nov. 17, 2015, 19 pages. |
| China Patent Office office actions for patent application CN201180053021.4 (Oct. 28, 2015). |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/913,636 dated Oct. 27, 2015, 22 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,378 dated Nov. 5, 2015, 28 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,640 dated Jun. 17, 2015, 11 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,500 dated Aug. 14, 2015, 26 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,230 dated Apr. 16, 2015, 16 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,502 dated Dec. 11, 2015, 25 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/601,415 dated Nov. 13, 2015, 18 pages. |
| China Patent Office office actions for patent application CN201280022008.7 (Dec. 3, 2015). |
| European Application No. 12783063.6, Office Action mailed on Nov. 11, 2015, 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,129, Notice of Allowance mailed on Sep. 22, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,187, dated Feb. 2, 2016, 15 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,072 dated Feb. 16, 2016, 17 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,735 dated Dec. 21, 2015, 20 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/827,987 dated Jan. 4, 2016, 16 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/177,748 dated Jan. 6, 2016, 9 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,640 dated Jan. 6, 2016, 16 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,428 dated Jan. 15, 2016, 25 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,153 dated Jan. 21, 2016, 31 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,958 dated Feb. 1, 2016, 20 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/827,631 dated Feb. 11, 2016, 12 pages. |
| Ghazal et al., Dynamic plan generation for parameterized queries, Jul. 2009, 7 pages. |
| Chaudhuri et al., Variance aware optimization of parameterized queries, Jun. 2010, 12 pages. |
| Seshadri et al., SmartCQL: Semantics to Handle Complex Queries over Data Streams, 2010, 5 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 15, 2015 for PCT/US2015/051268, 17 Pages. |
| “11 Oracle Event Processing NoSQL 1-20 Database Data Cartridge—Ilg Release 1 (11.1.1.7) 11,” Oracle Fusion Middleware CQL Language Reference for Oracle Event Processing 11g Release 1 (11.1.1.7), 4 pages (Sep. 25, 2013). |
| Oracle Event Processing Hadoop Data Cartridge—11g Release 1(11.1.1.7), Oracle Fusion Middleware CQL LanguageReference for Oracle Event Processing 11g Release 1 (11.1.1.7) 4 pages (Sep. 25, 2013). |
| Liu “Hbase Con 2014: HBase Design Patterns @Yahoo!” (May 5, 2014), 20 pages. |
| Hasan et al. “Towards unified and native enrichment in event processing systems,” Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Distributed event-based systems, pp. 171-182 (Jun. 29, 2013). |
| Katsov “In-Stream Big Data Processing : Highly Scalable Blog” 20 pages (Aug. 20, 2013). |
| Katsov “In-Stream Big Data Processing : Highly Scalable Blog” 19 pages (Aug. 29, 2014). |
| Data stream management system, Wikipedia, downloaded from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data—stream—management—system, pp. 1-5. |
| Oracle Complex Event Processing Exalogic Performance Study, http://www.oracle.com/technetwork!middleware/complex-event-processing/overview/cepexalogicwhitepaperfinal-498043.pdf, Sep. 2011, pp. 1-16. |
| Oracle® Complex Event Processing EPL Language Reference 11g Release 1 (11.1.1.4.0), E14304-02, Jan. 2011, 80 pages. |
| De Castro Alves, A General Extension System for Event Processing Languages, DEBS '11, New York, NY, USA, Jul. 11-15, 2011, pp. 1-9. |
| Josifovsky et al., Querying XML Streams, The VLDB Journal, vol. 14, 2005, pp. 197-210. |
| Purvee, Optimizing SPARQLeR Using Short Circuit Evaluation of Filter Clauses, Master of Science Thesis, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA, 2009, 66 pages. |
| Takenaka et al., A scalable complex event processing framework for combination of SQL-based continuous queries and C/C++ functions, FPL 2012, Oslo, Norway, Aug. 29-31, 2012, pp. 237-242. |
| Tomàs et al., RoSeS: A Continuous Content-Based Query Engine for RSS Feeds, DEXA 2011, Toulouse, France, Sep. 2, 2011, pp. 203-218. |
| Weidong et al., LeoXSS: An Efficient XML Stream System for Processing Complex XPaths, CIT 2006, Seoul, Korea, 2006, 6 pages. |
| Japanese Application No. 2013-529376, Office Action mailed on Aug. 18, 2015, 2 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/177,748, Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 21, 2015, 24 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/764,560, Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 15, 2015, 19 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/764,560, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 6, 2015, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,961, Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 31, 2015, 28 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/621,098 dated Oct. 15, 2015, 21 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,674 dated Oct. 15, 2015, 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,171 dated Oct. 15, 2015, 14 pages. |
| Babu et al., “Exploiting k-Constraints to Reduce Memory Overhead in Continuous Queries Over Data Streams”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) vol. 29 Issue 3, Sep. 2004, 36 pages. |
| Tho et al. “Zero-latency data warehousing for heterogeneous data sources and continuous data streams,” 5th International Conference on Information Integrationand Web-based Applications Services (Sep. 2003) 12 pages. |
| “SQL Subqueries”—Dec. 3, 2011, 2 pages. |
| “Caching Data with SqiDataSource Control”—Jul. 4, 2011, 3 pages. |
| “SCD—Slowing Changing Dimensions in a Data Warehouse”—Aug. 7, 2011, one page. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,259 dated Oct. 24, 2014, 21 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,665 dated Nov. 24, 2014, 9 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/827,631 dated Nov. 13, 2014, 10 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/827,987 dated Nov. 6, 2014, 9 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/601,415 dated Oct. 6, 2014, 18 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,230 dated Dec. 4, 2014, 30 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,640 dated Dec. 2, 2014, 11 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,428 dated Dec. 5, 2014, 23 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,502 dated Nov. 20, 2014, 25 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/839,288 dated Dec. 4, 2014, 30 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 29, 2015 for PCT/US2014/010920, 30 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 29, 2015 for PCT/US2014/039771, 24 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,759 dated Feb. 18, 2016, 18 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,961 dated Apr. 4, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,259 dated Feb. 19, 2016, 47 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,500 dated Mar. 17, 2016, 34 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/764,560 dated Apr. 14, 2016, 20 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/621,098 dated Apr. 21, 2016, 16 pages. |
| Hirzel et al., “SPL Stream Processing Language Report”, IBM Research Report RC24897 (W0911-044), IBM Research Division, Thomas J. Watson Research center, Yorktown Heights, NY, Nov. 5, 2009, 19 pages. |
| Japan Patent Office office actions JPO patent application JP2014-509315 (Mar. 15, 2016). |
| Yosuke Watanabe et al., Development of a Data Stream Integration System with a Multiple Query Optimizer, Journal articles of the 15th Data Engineering Workshop (DEWS2004), The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Technical Committee on Data Engineering, Aug. 11, 2009, pp. 1-8. |
| Shuhei Kuwata et al., Stream Data Analysis Application for Customer Behavior with Complex Event Processing, IEICE Technical Report, The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Jun. 21, 2010, vol. 110, No. 107, pp. 13-18. |
| Hiroyuki Kitagawa et al., Sensing Network, Information Processing, Information Processing Society of Japan, Sep. 15, 2010, vol. 51, No. 9, pp. 1119-1126. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,659 dated Apr. 22, 2016, 38 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,815 dated May 10, 2016, 32 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,081 dated May 3, 2016, 6 pages. |
| Bestehorn Fault-tolerant query processing in structured P2P-systems, Springer Science+Business Media LLC Distrib Parallel Databases 28:33-66 (May 8, 2010). |
| Kramer “Semantics and Implementation of Continuous Sliding Window Queries over Data Streams” ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol. 34, pp. 4:1 to 4:49 (Apr. 2009). |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,428 dated May 26, 2016, 26 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/601,415 dated May 17, 2016, 17 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/RU2015/000468, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Apr. 25, 2016, 9 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/US2015/016346, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on May 24, 2016, 5 pages. |
| cooperativesystems: “Combined WLAN and Inertial Indoor Pedestrian Positioning System” URL:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEt88WaHZvU. |
| Frank et al “Development and Evaluation of a Combined WLAN & Inertial Indoor Pedestrian Positioning System” Proceedings of the 22nd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute Of Navigation (ION GNSS 2009). (Sep. 25, 2009) pp. 538-546. |
| China Patent Office office action for patent application CN201180053021.4 (May 27, 2016). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140358959 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
