This is a U.S. national stage of application No. PCT/EP2013/075708, filed on 5 Dec. 2013, which claims priority to the German Application No. DE 10 2012 224 093.4 filed 20 Dec. 2012, the content of both incorporated herein by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a valve device for a motor vehicle, having a housing, having a flow duct situated in the housing, having a flap which is arranged in the flow duct and which serves for closing off the flow duct, wherein the flap is fastened to a spindle, and the spindle is mounted rotatably in the housing, and having a valve seat which is arranged in the flow duct and which is in contact with the flap when the latter is in its closed position.
2. Related Art
Valve devices are used, for example, as throttle flap connectors or exhaust life gas recirculation valves, and have long been known. By making use of the rotatably mounted flap, it is possible for the flow duct to be completely closed or opened so as to realize a maximum mass throughput. Accordingly, the valve device is designed with regard to the maximum mass throughput and thus with regard to the free flow cross section in the region of the flap. With regard to the regulation of the mass throughput, the greatest difficulty lies in obtaining adequate regulation quality at minimum mass throughput, at which the flap is pivoted by only a few degrees out of the closed state. For this purpose, careful adaptation is necessary with regard to the geometry and material pairings between the flap and the flow duct. For this purpose, it is known to arrange a valve seat in the flow duct in the region of the closed position of the flap, which valve seat is correspondingly adapted to the flap and, if appropriate, to the seal arranged on the circumference of the flap. A disadvantage here is that, for different requirements that demand a different maximum throughput, respectively different valve devices with correspondingly adapted flaps and valve seats must be provided. Owing to the exact adaptation, the different valve devices involve a great amount of outlay.
It is an object of the invention to provide a valve device with which different maximum mass throughput can be realized with little outlay with only one flow duct cross section.
This object may be achieved in that at least a section of the flow duct adjacent to the valve seat has a cross section smaller than the inner diameter of the valve seat.
Owing to the formation of the smaller cross section in the flow duct, extending only over a part of the length of the flow duct in the valve device, the requirement of the maximum mass throughput is no longer determined by the free cross-sectional area, through which flow can pass, of flap and valve seat, but by the cross-sectional area of the flow duct. This makes it possible for other sections of the flow duct to be formed with other, in particular larger, cross sections. The decisive advantage consists in that, in this way, it is possible to even use relatively large valve seats with corresponding flaps. It is therefore not necessary to develop a new flap with an adapted valve seat for every new maximum mass throughput; rather, it is possible to make use of existing flaps and valve seats. Since the adaptation of flap and valve seat with regard to regulation involves considerably less outlay, the use of existing parts leads to considerable simplification. By contrast, the adaptation of a section of the flow duct to a new, smaller maximum mass throughput involves considerably less outlay, such that a very great number of usage situations is covered by the valve device according to the invention. For example, it is even possible to use existing housing structures, as the adaptation is restricted only to the flow duct.
In an advantageous refinement, the section of the flow duct with the cross section smaller than the inner diameter of the valve seat is arranged downstream of the valve seat. This change to the flow duct can be realized with particularly little outlay, because such valve devices generally have cast metal housings, and the changed flow duct is generated already during the casting process by way of a modified core.
In another refinement, a modified casting process for producing the valve housing is eliminated in that the flow duct with the smaller cross section is formed by an insert, which is arranged in the flow duct and adjacent to the valve seat, wherein the insert has a cross section smaller than the inner diameter of the valve seat. The advantage of this refinement is that not only the valve seat and flap but also the housing can be used no longer just for one usage situation but for all new usage situations. Since the adaptation to new maximum mass throughputs is realized exclusively by way of the insert, all other components can be carried over unchanged. The flow duct merely has to be prepared for receiving the insert. This adaptation can however be produced with little outlay.
In another refinement, the flow duct with the smaller cross section is formed by two inserts, which are arranged in the flow duct, wherein a respective insert is arranged to each side of the valve seat, and both inserts also have the smaller cross section in relation to the inner diameter of the valve seat. With this refinement, within the two inserts, a volume adapted to the smaller maximum mass throughput is created, which improves the regulability by way of the flap arranged between the two inserts.
To permit and ensure a flow around the flap which is as free from turbulence as possible, and thus good regulability, the at least one insert or flow duct is designed such that, in the direction of the valve seat, the smaller cross section widens continuously up to the inner diameter of the valve seat. This refinement has the advantage that the cross-sectional reduction comes to bear only at large opening angles of the flap, whereas at small opening angles, the good regulability owing to the large cross section of the valve seat is maintained.
In a simple refinement, the insert or flow duct with the smaller cross section in relation to the valve seat is of rotationally symmetrical design. If the maximum mass throughput is decreased only slightly, then it may be provided in further advantageous refinements that the insert or the flow duct has a spherical cap-shaped cross-sectional reduction that extends only over a part of the circumference, preferably over a range from 90° to 180° of the circumference.
The arrangement of the valve seat and/or of the respective insert in the flow duct is particularly simple if it is screwed in or pressed in.
Turbulence in the flow owing to the reduced cross section can be reduced by virtue of the cross section merging continuously into the cross section of the flow duct. This means that the diameters of the at least one insert and of the flow duct are equal at this location. This may be realized firstly by way of a reduced cross section in the flow duct. Since, in order for the insert to be received in the flow duct, the latter must have the smaller cross section in any case, the corresponding adaptation to the cross-sectional dimension of the insert involves little outlay.
A continuous transition between flow duct and insert without an adaptation of the flow duct is attained by virtue of the insert having a contour oriented in the direction of the flow duct and widening from the smallest cross section to the cross section of the flow duct. Such widening may be of frustoconical form in the manner of a funnel, or may be formed with a concave or convex shell surface.
In a further refinement, the cross section of the flow duct is subsequently widened again to the original cross section. With this refinement, an undisrupted transition of the flow duct of the housing to the connected components in the flow path is ensured. Additional adaptations or transition parts are not required.
The invention will be discussed in more detail on the basis of several exemplary embodiments. In the figures:
a and 4 show further embodiments of the valve device of
In
Thus, while there have been shown and described and pointed out fundamental novel features of the invention as applied to a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be understood that various omissions and, substitutions and changes in the form and details of the devices illustrated, and in their operation, may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. For example, it is expressly intended that all combinations of those elements and/or method steps which perform substantially the same function in substantially the same way to achieve the same results are within the scope of the invention. Moreover, it should be recognized that structures and/or elements and/or method steps shown and/or described in connection with any disclosed form or embodiment of the invention may be incorporated in any other disclosed or described or suggested form or embodiment as a general matter of design choice. It is the intention, therefore, to be limited only as indicated by the scope of the claims appended hereto.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2012 224 093 | Dec 2012 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/075708 | 12/5/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/095404 | 6/26/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2089771 | Swinney | Aug 1937 | A |
2414751 | Ludeman | Jan 1947 | A |
2920858 | Hunter | Jan 1960 | A |
3747581 | Kolb | Jul 1973 | A |
4298548 | Pontoppidan | Nov 1981 | A |
4340549 | McKim | Jul 1982 | A |
4905647 | Kizer et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
6446934 | Bonomi | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6698717 | Brookshire et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6889652 | Meiwes | May 2005 | B2 |
7264221 | Yeary et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7264224 | Weston | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7866298 | Shimura et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8100118 | Sudmanns | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20120145134 | Miyazaki et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101225773 | Jul 2008 | CN |
10147333 | Apr 2003 | DE |
102006043647 | Apr 2007 | DE |
10 2007 007 111 | Aug 2008 | DE |
102007033679 | Jan 2009 | DE |
0 188 130 | Jul 1986 | EP |
1 273 786 | Jan 2003 | EP |
2175180 | Apr 2010 | EP |
10073167 | Mar 1998 | JP |
2002 286148 | Oct 2002 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2016 which issued in the corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201380066855.8. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160195044 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |