This application is a 35 U.S.C. § 371 National Stage Application of PCT/EP2012/050093, filed on Jan. 4, 2012, which claims the benefit of priority to Serial No. DE 10 2011 004 993.2, filed on Mar. 2, 2011 in Germany, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The disclosure relates to a valve device and to a quantity control valve as disclosed herein.
Valve devices, for example quantity control valves of a fuel system of an internal combustion engine, are known from the marketplace. Valve devices of this type frequently have a valve body which can come into contact with a housing-side sealing seat at a sealing section and can therefore close the valve device. The sealing seat is, for example, of flat, cylindrical, spherical or conical configuration. In the closed state of the valve device, pressure pulses can occur in the hydraulic lines which are connected to the valve device, as a result of which a liquid vapor (“vapor bubbles”) can be produced in the region of the sealing section and the sealing seat. The implosion of said vapor bubbles results in what is known as cavitation erosion on surrounding sections of the housing and/or the valve body.
The problem on which the disclosure is based is solved by way of a valve device and a quantity control valve as disclosed herein. Advantageous developments are specified in the subclaims. Furthermore, features which are important for the disclosure are found in the following description and in the drawings; the features can be important for the disclosure on their own and also in different combinations, without reference being made to this again explicitly.
The valve device according to the disclosure has the advantage that the resistance to cavitation erosion in the region of a sealing seat and/or a sealing section of the valve device is improved. Here, the flow coefficient and the pressure drop along a flow channel, as well as the valve lift, the valve switching time and the long-term strength of the valve device remain substantially unchanged.
The disclosure proceeds from the consideration that a high resistance to cavitation erosion in a sealing region which is formed by a sealing section and a sealing seat on the one hand and a high flow coefficient of the valve device on the other hand can be conflicting requirements. Although it is possible to increase the flow coefficient of the valve device with an unchanged valve lift by means of bevels or rounded portions which are positioned immediately upstream of the sealing region, this results in a gap with a wedge-like cross section between the sealing section and the sealing seat when the valve device is closed. Independently of the respective pressure, the bubbles in the fluid which are formed on account of cavitation effects will decay in said gap after all and therefore comparatively quickly, as a result of which erosion of the sealing section and/or the sealing seat can occur.
According to the disclosure, when the valve device is closed, the valve device has a decaying space in a flow channel immediately upstream of the sealing region. Here, a bounding wall of the decaying space is formed by a deflector wall which adjoins the sealing region, the deflector wall being tilted at least in regions with respect to the normal to the sealing region at an angle of from at most 15° in the flow direction to at most 60° counter to the flow direction. A further bounding wall of the decaying space runs, for example, approximately parallel to the sealing region, which results in an upstream step upstream of the sealing region. When the valve device is open, the flow can already be deflected in the region of the decaying space approximately parallel to the sealing section and to the sealing seat, with the result that flow passes through the sealing region virtually in the entire cross section thereof.
One refinement of the disclosure provides that the deflector wall is tilted at least in regions with respect to the normal to the sealing region at an angle of from at most 5° in the flow direction to at most 20° counter to the flow direction, more preferably that the deflector wall is tilted at least in regions with respect to the normal to the sealing region at an angle of from at most 2° in the flow direction to at most 10° counter to the flow direction, even more preferably that the deflector wall is arranged at least in regions at a right angle in relation to the sealing region. In this way, ranges are described for a spatial orientation of the deflector wall, in which ranges firstly a particularly favorable ratio of low cavitation erosion and secondly a high flow speed or low pressure drop along the flow channel are achieved. The effect which is intended by the disclosure is therefore particularly high in the stated angular ranges.
Furthermore, the disclosure provides that the deflector wall is formed on a housing and/or on a valve body of the valve device. As a result, the decaying space can also be formed as an alternative or even at the same time on the housing or on the valve body. The valve device can therefore be configured structurally in a wide variety of ways.
The flow coefficient of the valve device can be improved if a bounding wall of the flow channel has a rounded portion or a bevel upstream of and close to the deflector wall. In this way, the flow speed in the sealing region can be increased further, without the cavitation erosion increasing.
Furthermore, it is provided that a bounding wall of the flow channel immediately upstream of the rounded portion has an angle with respect to a longitudinal axis of the flow channel of at most ±15°. A particularly suitable geometry of the valve device is described as a result.
The cavitation erosion can be reduced further if there is an undercut in a bounding wall of the flow channel upstream of and close to the deflector wall and/or in the deflector wall. When the valve device is closed, the hydraulic end of the fluid region which lies upstream and therefore the location of the decay of the cavitation bubbles can be kept particularly far away from the sealing region. The larger and/or deeper the undercut, the lower the cavitation erosion in general.
Further refinements provide that the valve body is of plate-shaped, cylindrical, spherical or conical configuration or that it is a double cone valve. The disclosure can be used advantageously for said geometries of the valve body and the valve device.
The production of the valve device can be simplified and made less expensive if the housing is in multiple pieces in the region of the deflector wall. As a result, the above-described wide variety of geometries of the valve device upstream of the sealing region can possibly be produced by way of separate elements and therefore in a simpler manner.
In the following text, exemplary embodiments of the invention will be explained with reference to the drawing, in which:
The same designations are used for functionally equivalent elements and variables in all figures, even in the case of different embodiments.
During operation of the fuel system 10, the prefeed pump 16 delivers fuel from the fuel tank 12 into the low pressure line 18. Here, the quantity control valve 22 determines the fuel quantity which is fed to the delivery space of the high pressure pump 24.
The sealing seat 32 and the sealing section 34 are configured so as to be planar and parallel to one another, and together form a sealing region 42. Upstream of the sealing region 42, a decaying space 44 is formed by means of a step-like recess in the housing 30, which decaying space 44 is delimited by a deflector wall 46 which extends at a right angle from the sealing region 42 or the plane thereof. Two dashed lines 48 along the flow channel 38 define a cross section of the flow channel 38 with a particularly high flow velocity. Downstream of the sealing region 42, the spacing of the two dashed lines 48 is characterized by a dimension 50.
It can be seen that the fuel in the drawing of
When the vapor bubbles 54 implode, the loading which is produced in the process is distributed to a relatively large surface area of the valve body 36 and/or the deflector wall 46, as a result of which the cavitation erosion is reduced considerably. In particular, in a surrounding area of the vapor bubble 54, the valve device 22 does not have any narrowing (wedge-like) spatial sections which are possibly particularly susceptible to cavitation erosion.
The deflector wall 46 can also be tilted with respect to the normal 58 to the sealing region 42 at most by 15° in the flow direction or, as an alternative, at most by 60° counter to the flow direction. Both alternatives are indicated in
The embodiments shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2011 004 993 | Mar 2011 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/050093 | 1/4/2012 | WO | 00 | 11/4/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/116850 | 9/7/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4337788 | Seger | Jul 1982 | A |
4503814 | Fujihara | Mar 1985 | A |
4640255 | Hafele | Feb 1987 | A |
4836498 | Heron | Jun 1989 | A |
4915354 | Sims, Jr. | Apr 1990 | A |
4926902 | Nakamura | May 1990 | A |
5810328 | Boehland | Sep 1998 | A |
5921473 | Romann | Jul 1999 | A |
5950650 | Pacht | Sep 1999 | A |
6039031 | Ricco | Mar 2000 | A |
6105610 | Watkins, II | Aug 2000 | A |
6349920 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6378502 | Betz | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6427932 | Danckert | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6505812 | Anastas | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6631706 | Yamada | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6752170 | Muramatsu | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7225831 | Hope | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7303194 | Smith, III | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7537194 | Nagai | May 2009 | B2 |
7780144 | Van Der Linden | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7819637 | Oda | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7832653 | Yukimoto | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8342203 | Weaver | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20030024571 | Simmons | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030056758 | Onishi | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040016420 | Hess | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20070063159 | Rodriguez-Amaya | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070119991 | Schuerg | May 2007 | A1 |
20080217421 | Lewis | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080257430 | Best | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100116910 | Girlinger | May 2010 | A1 |
20110123376 | Aritomi | May 2011 | A1 |
20110209784 | Stein | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1875184 | Dec 2006 | CN |
199 34 715 | Mar 2000 | DE |
10 2008 000 658 | Oct 2008 | DE |
1 251 267 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1 471 248 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1 717 446 | Nov 2006 | EP |
5-195910 | Aug 1993 | JP |
6-22669 | Mar 1994 | JP |
7-253170 | Oct 1995 | JP |
2000-55215 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2006-177365 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006-329180 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2006329180 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007-146861 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2008-248788 | Oct 2008 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report corresponding to PCT Application No. PCT/EP2012/050093, dated Mar. 27, 2012 (German and English language document) (7 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140048043 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |