Valve for intravenous-line flow-control system

Abstract
A valve (7) for use in controlling the flow of IV fluid from a source to a patient. A cassette may include along the fluid passage through the cassette, first and second membrane-based valves (6, 7) on either side of a pressure-conduction chamber (50), and a stopcock-type valve (20). The stopcock valve is preferably located downstream of the second membrane-based valve (7), which is preferably located downstream of the pressure-conduction chamber (50). The membrane defining the valving chamber of the second membrane-based valve (7) is preferably large and resilient, so that the valving chamber(75) may provide a supply of pressurized intravenous fluid to the patient, when the valve (6) is closed and the stopcock valve (20) provides a restriction downstream of the valve (7). The pressure-conduction chamber (50) preferably has a membrane (41) that is stable in the empty-chamber position but relatively unstable in the filled-chamber position.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




The present invention relates to apparatus and methods for controlling flow through an intravenous line.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The invention is directed to a cassette for controlling the flow of IV fluid from a source to a patient. The cassette preferably includes, along the fluid passage through the cassette, first and second membrane-based valves on either side of a pressure-conduction chamber, and a stopcock-type valve. The stopcock valve is preferably located downstream of the second membrane-based valve, which is preferably located downstream of the pressure-conduction chamber.




In a preferred version of the cassette, which is primarily made out of rigid material, the membrane for the second membrane-based valve is disposed adjacent the housing, such that the rigid housing and the membrane define a valving chamber. One passage enters the valving chamber at a first mouth located at the end of a protrusion of the rigid housing into the valving chamber towards the membrane, and the valve may prevent the flow of fluid therethrough when the membrane is forced against the first mouth, by the control unit. The control valve restricts the flow of intravenous fluid from the valving chamber to the patient, since it is located downstream of the valving chamber. The membrane defining the valving chamber is preferably large and resilient, so that the valving chamber may provide a supply of pressurized intravenous fluid to the patient, when the first mouth is sealed closed and when there is a restriction downstream of the valving chamber.




For the pressure-conduction chamber, a membrane is preferably disposed adjacent the rigid housing, so as to define a pressure-conduction chamber, wherein the rigid housing portion that defines the pressure-conduction chamber is generally dome-shaped. The membrane has a filled-chamber position, in which position the pressure-conduction chamber is substantially at its greatest volume, and an empty-chamber position, in which position the pressure-conduction chamber is at its smallest volume, and in which position the membrane rests against the rigid housing and assumes the dome shape of the rigid housing. The membrane preferably has a structure for creating instability in the membrane in the filled-chamber position. Preferably, this structure may be actuated to create instability in the membrane in the empty-chamber position. The rigid housing and the second membrane in the empty-chamber position preferably define an unobstructed fluid passageway through the pressure-conduction chamber from the first to the second pressure-conduction chamber mouth. Preferably, the structure for creating instability in the membrane causes the membrane, when its at its full-chamber position, to collapse in the region of the pressure-conduction chamber's outlet mouth before collapsing nearer the inlet mouth. This structure helps force bubbles in the fluid upward toward the inlet mouth and the IV fluid source during a bubble-purge cycle.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

shows a top view of a cassette according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 2 and 3

show front and bottom views respectively of the cassette of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 4

shows a control unit for receiving and controlling a cassette, such as the cassette of

FIGS. 1-3

.





FIG. 5

shows a cross-section of the cassette of

FIGS. 1-3

.





FIG. 6

shows a rear view of the cassette and shows the fluid paths through the cassette.





FIG. 7

shows a front view of the middle rigid panel of the cassette of

FIGS. 1-3

.





FIGS. 8 and 9

show side and rear views respectively of the middle panel of FIG.


7


.





FIG. 10

shows a partial cross-section of the middle panel of FIG.


7


.





FIG. 11

is a cross-sectional detail of the control valve of the cassette according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 12

shows a side view of an outer cylinder (a valve-seat member) having rigid and resilient elements that may be used in the control valve.





FIG. 13

shows a cross-sectional view of the cylinder of FIG.


12


.





FIG. 14

depicts the relationship between the aperture of the

FIG. 12

cylinder and the groove used in the control valve.





FIG. 15

shows a cross-sectional view of the membrane that may be used in the pressure-conduction chamber of the cassette shown in FIG.


1


.





FIGS. 16 and 17

show front and rear views respectively of the

FIG. 15

membrane.





FIG. 18

shows a front view of the membrane used in the valve located downstream of the pressure-conduction chamber and upstream of the control valve.





FIG. 19

shows a cross-section of the

FIG. 18

membrane.





FIG. 20

is a schematic representing how the compliant membrane of

FIG. 18

may be used to regulate the pressure of fluid to the patient.





FIG. 21

is a graph depicting the advantage of using a compliant membrane such as that shown in FIG.


18


.





FIGS. 22 and 23

depict the preferred shape of the inlet valve to the pressure conduction chamber.





FIG. 24

shows a cross-sectional view of the inlet valve to the pressure conduction chamber.





FIG. 25

shows a preferred arrangement of teeth around the circumference of the control wheel.





FIG. 26

shows a front view of a cassette according to an alternative preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 27

shows a front view of the membrane that may be used in the pressure-conduction chamber of the cassette shown in FIG.


26


.





FIG. 28

shows a cross-sectional view of the membrane shown in

FIG. 27

along line B—B.





FIG. 29

shows a cross-sectional view of the membrane shown in

FIG. 27

along line


29


;





FIG. 30

shows a cross-sectional view of the membrane shown in

FIG. 27

along line A—A.





FIG. 31

shows a perspective view of an alternative cassette which may use the membrane shown in FIGS.


27


-


30


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS




The present invention includes a cassette for use in a system for controlling the flow of IV fluid to a patient, along the lines of the cassettes disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,088,515 and 5,195,986. A preferred embodiment of the cassette is depicted in

FIGS. 1-3

, which respectively depict top, front and bottom views of the cassette. The cassette is used in a control unit, such as that described in above-referenced U.S. Pat. No. 5,772,637, entitled “Intravenous-Line Flow-Control System,” which is similar to the control unit described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,088,515, which describe the use of pressure, preferably pneumatic pressure, for controlling the actuation of valves and the urging of fluid into and out of a pressure-conduction chamber. In addition to performing the function of a pump urging fluid through the IV line, the pressure-conduction chamber can measure the amount of IV fluid being delivered to the patient as well as detect the presence of bubbles in the IV fluid in the pressure-conduction chamber. Preferred methods of detecting and eliminating air bubbles from the IV fluid are discussed in the above-referenced patent applications for “Intravenous-Line Air-Detection System” and “Intravenous-Line Air-Elimination System,” now U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,641,982 and 5,713,865, respectively.

FIG. 4

depicts a preferred version of a control unit


10


. Control unit


10


, which has a user-interface panel


103


containing a key pad and a display so that the status of the IV fluid delivery may be monitored and modified by medical personnel. The cassette is slipped behind door


102


, and by turning handle


101


the door is pressed against the cassette, which in turn is then pressed against the main housing of the control unit


10


. The main housing


104


preferably includes mechanical means for actuating membrane-covered valves and for applying a pressure against the membrane of the pressure-conduction chamber. The main housing


104


also includes means for turning the control wheel of the cassette.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, the main components of the preferred embodiment of the cassette are a first membrane-based valve


6


, a pressure-conduction chamber


50


, a second membrane based valve


7


and a stopcock-type control valve


20


. Valve


6


controls the flow to the pressure-conduction chamber


50


from the inlet


31


to the cassette, which is connected to an IV line, which in turn is connected to a source of IV fluid. The second membrane-based valve


7


and the control valve


20


together are used to control the flow of fluid from the pressure-conduction chamber


50


to the outlet to the cassette


33


, which is connected to the IV line leading to the patient.




The rigid housing


15


of the cassette is made primarily from three rigid panels. A front panel


17


, a middle panel


18


, and a rear panel


16


, all three of which can be seen in

FIGS. 1 and 3

. The front panel is preferably molded integrally with the outer collar


21


of the control valve


2


. The wheel


20


of the control valve


2


preferably includes ribs


281


and/or teeth mounted along the circumference


29


of the knob


20


. (

FIG. 25

shows a preferred arrangement of teeth around the circumference


29


of the control knob


20


.) The teeth and/or ribs


281


may be engaged by the main housing


104


of the control unit


10


, so that the control unit


10


may change the resistance that the control valve


2


exerts on the IV fluid passing through the valve.




The cassette may also be used without the control unit


10


. In that case, the control wheel


20


may be turned by hand. When disengaged from the control unit


10


, the membrane of the pressure-conduction chamber


50


is preferably collapsed so that it rests against the rigid rear wall


59


of the pressure-conduction chamber


50


. With the membrane in this collapsed state, IV fluid may still easily flow through the pressure-conduction chamber


50


through a raised portion


35


of the rear wall


59


. This raised portion


35


defines a conduit


36


leading from the inlet mouth of the pressure-conduction chamber


50


to the outlet mouth of the pressure-conduction chamber, as can be seen in FIG.


6


.

FIG. 6

shows the fluid paths leading through the cassette. As noted above, fluid enters the cassette through the inlet


31


, whence it flows through a fluid path to valve


6


. The fluid then enters the valving chamber of valve


6


through an inlet port


62


. An outlet port


61


is preferably mounted on a protrusion so that pressure from the pressure-conduction chamber


50


is less likely to force the membrane to lift from the outlet port


61


. From valve


6


the fluid passes to the inlet mouth


56


of the pressure-conduction chamber


50


. The pressure-conduction chamber is seen in the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 5. A

membrane


41


allows pressure from the control unit


10


to be applied to the fluid in the pressure-conduction chamber


50


without the fluid coming into contact with the control unit


10


. When the membrane


41


is in its collapsed position resting against rigid wall


59


, as shown in

FIG. 5

, fluid can still pass from inlet valve


56


through conduit


36


to the outlet valve


57


. After passing through the pressure-conduction chamber


50


, the fluid flows to the second membrane-based valve


7


, which included an inlet mouth


73


, which is mounted on a protrusion


72


in similar fashion to the outlet port


61


of the first membrane-based valve


6


. The second membrane-based valve's inlet mouth


73


and the protrusion


72


on which it is mounted can be seen in the cross-sectional view of FIG.


5


. Like the outlet port


61


of the first membrane-based valve, the inlet mouth


73


may be closed by the application of pressure by the control unit on a membrane; a first portion


71


of the membrane that closes off the inlet mouth


73


can be seen in FIG.


5


. After passing through the outlet mouth


76


of the second membrane-based valve


7


, the fluid passes to the inlet


77


of the stopcock-type control valve, which inlet can be seen in both

FIGS. 5 and 6

. After passing through the control valve and the fluid path


78


exiting from the control valve, the fluid passes to the outlet of the cassette


33


and to the IV line leading to the patient.





FIG. 7

shows a front view of the rigid middle portion of the cassette, and

FIG. 8

shows a side view of the middle rigid panel


18


. The middle rigid panel


18


defines the cassette inlet


31


and outlet


33


, a circumferential portion of the pressure-conduction chamber


50


, and port


62


, outlet port


61


, inlet mouth


73


, and outlet mouth


76


of the two membrane-based valves


6


and


7


. The protrusions


63


and


72


of the outlet port


61


and inlet mouth


73


can also be seen in FIG.


7


.

FIG. 9

shows a rear view of the middle rigid panel


18


shown in

FIGS. 7 and 8

. The ports/mouths


61


,


62


,


73


,


76


can also be seen in FIG.


9


.

FIG. 10

shows a partial cross-section of the middle rigid portion. The cross-section shows the outer collar


21


of the control valve, which is integrally molded with the rest of the middle rigid portion. The outer collar


21


defines a hollow area


22


and a fluid path


23


leading from the hollow area


22


.





FIG. 11

shows a cross-section of an assembled control valve


2


that may be used in a cassette according to the present invention. Just inside of the outer collar


21


is a valve-seat member


22


fixedly attached to the outer collar


21


so that the valve-seat member


21


does not rotate with respect to the rest of the cassette. The valve-seat member


21


is depicted in greater detail in FIG.


12


and in cross-section in FIG.


13


. The valve-seat member


22


also defines a hollow area, which accepts the shaft


220


of the control wheel


20


, so that the control wheel's shaft


220


rotates with the control wheel


20


. The valve-seat member


22


is comprised mostly of rigid material, but importantly it also includes molded-over resilient material, which is used to form sealing O-rings. This resilient material forms an O-ring


26


around the base of the valve-seat member


22


; the rigid portion of the base defines a passage


222


, connecting the valve inlet


77


to passage


24


. The resilient material


25


also provides a seal around an aperture


251


in the circumferential surface of the member


22


. At the end of the member


22


opposite the inlet passage


222


is an inner O-ring


27


which forms the seal between the control wheel's shaft


220


and the valve-seat member


22


. The O-ring


26


around the exterior circumference of the base provides a seal between the outer circumferential wall of the valve-seat member


22


and the inner circumferential wall of the outer collar


21


. Likewise, the O-ring


25


around the circumferential port


251


may provide a seal between the outer circumferential wall of the valve-seat member


22


and the inner circumferential wall of the outer collar


21


. Together, O-rings


25


,


26


prevent fluid from leaking between the valve-seat member


22


and the outer collar


21


. Importantly, the O-ring


25


of port


251


also provides a seal between the valve-seat member


22


and the shaft


220


, so that when the valve is in the fully closed position no flow is permitted between passageway


24


of shaft


220


and the port


251


of the valve-seat member


22


.




The advantage of this design over previous stopcock valves is that the outer diameter of the shaft


220


may be slightly less than the inner diameter of the valve-seat member


22


, whereas previous stopcock valves required an interference fit between the inner and outer components. It will be appreciated that the stopcock valve of the present invention may use frusto-conical-shaped members instead of cylindrical members. The interference fit of prior-art devices created a great deal of resistance when the stopcock valves were turned. The use of O-rings in the stopcock valve of the present invention avoids the need for this interference fit and the greater torque required for turning the valve resulting from the interference fit. O-ring


27


prevents leaking from the space between the valve-seat member


22


and the shaft of the control wheel


20


.




The valve-seat member is preferably made in a two-part molding process, wherein the rigid portion is first molded and then the softer resilient material is over-molded onto the rigid portion. Channels may be provided in the initially molded rigid portion so that the resilient material may flow to all the desired locations; this results in columns of resilient material


28


connecting the areas of resilient material through these channels. The valve-seat member


22


is preferably molded separately from the rest of the cassette, and when the cassette is assembled the valve-seat member


22


is placed in the hollow defined by the outer collar


21


of the middle panel


18


, and aligned so that aperture


251


lines up with passageway


23


. (The shape of the outer diameter of the valve-seat member


22


and the inner diameter of the outer collar


21


may be complementarily shaped so that the valve-seat member must align properly with the aperture


251


and the passageway


23


lined up.) Then, the front rigid panel


17


is ultrasonically welded (along with the rear rigid panel


16


) to the middle rigid panel


18


, and the valve-seat member


22


is then held in place in the hollow area defined by the outer collar


21


. The outer circumference of the valve-seat member


22


may be a bit smaller than the inner diameter of the outer collar


21


; O-rings


25


,


26


prevent fluid from flowing from the passages


77


or


23


to point


19


. This design of the valve-seat member


22


avoids the need for tight tolerances in the various components of the valve


2


. The control wheel's shaft


220


may be inserted into the hollow area defined by valve-seat member


22


after the rest of the valve has been assembled. The shaft


22


(


0


is held in place by a lip


161


around the inner circumference of the hollow area defined by the rear rigid panel


16






When the valve


2


is fully opened, the circumferential aperture


251


is lined up with the fluid passage


24


in the shaft


220


. When the valve is fully closed there is no fluid communication between the aperture


251


and the fluid passage


24


. The outer circumferential surface of the shaft


220


preferably includes a groove extending circumferentially around the shaft's outer circumferential wall from the terminus of the fluid passage


24


at the outer circumferential wall; the groove tapers in cross-sectional area and does not extend all the way around the outer circumference of the shaft


220


. The groove provides greater control of the flow rate.

FIG. 14

shows the respective locations of the groove


231


, which is located on the outer circumference of the shaft


220


and the circumferential aperture


251


of the valve seat member


22


. As the aperture


251


rotates to the right, in the

FIG. 14

perspective, the resistance to flow increases, until the groove


231


tends and the aperture


251


loses fluid communication with the groove


231


, at which point flow is completely shut off through the control valve


2


. As the aperture


251


rotates to the left, in the

FIG. 14

perspective, the resistance to flow decreases. Preferably, the groove


231


is longer than the diameter of the aperture


251


, so that the flow rate may be controlled more finely.




As noted above, the cassette may be used independently of the control unit


10


. When the cassette is used in this manner it is preferable that the membrane


41


rest against the rigid back


59


of the pressure-conduction chamber


50


so as to minimize the volume of the conduit


36


for fluid passing through the pressure conduction chamber


50


. If the membrane


41


were too flexible and the volume of the pressure-conduction chamber


50


varied widely, medical personnel would be unable to rely on a quick visual inspection of the rate of dripping in the drip chamber to indicate a steady, desired flow rate through the IV line. Thus, it is desired that the structure of the membrane


41


be such that it tends to rest against wall


59


unless and until a sufficient pressure differential is created across the diaphragm


41


. This pressure differential is preferably caused by a negative gas pressure caused by the control unit


10


. Although it is desired to manufacture the diaphragm


41


so that it has some tendency to rest against wall


59


, it is desired to make the diaphragm


41


floppy in the other direction so that less pressure is required to move it from its position when the pressure-conduction chamber


50


is full, the “filled-chamber” position. It is also desired that the measurement gas provided by the control unit


10


against the outer face of the membrane


41


be at substantially the same pressure as the fluid on the inner side of the membrane


41


in the pressure-conduction chamber


50


.




By molding the diaphragm


41


in the shape of a dome corresponding to that of the rigid wall


59


, the diaphragm will have a tendency to remain in its position, as shown in

FIG. 5

, resting against wall


59


when the chamber


50


is at its lowest volume, the “empty-chamber” position. However, when the diaphragm


41


is molded in this way, it also tends to remain in the filled-chamber position, in other words, when the diaphragm


41


is bulging convexly outward from the cassette. This convex, filled-chamber position can be made unstable by adding additional material on the outer, usually concave surface of the diaphragm


41


. This additional material


43


can be seen in the cross-section of a preferred embodiment of the diaphragm as shown in FIG.


15


. The diaphragm


41


shown in

FIG. 15

is molded in the position shown and has a tendency to remain in that position. When the chamber is filled with fluid, the normally concave side of the diaphragm becomes convex, and the additional material


43


is subject to an additional amount of strain since it is at the outer radius of this convex, filled-chamber position. The diaphragm


41


shown in FIG. I


5


also includes an integrally molded O-ring


44


around its circumference for mounting and sealing the diaphragm


41


in the cassette.

FIG. 16

shows a view of the exterior side of the diaphragm


41


of FIG.


15


. This surface of the diaphragm


41


is normally concave when the diaphragm is in the empty-chamber position. The additional material


43


can be seen in the view of FIG.


16


.

FIG. 17

shows the interior side of the diaphragm


41


of FIG.


15


. This side is normally convex when the diaphragm


41


is in the empty-chamber position. Thus, as a result of molding the diaphragm so that its inner surface has a smooth constant radius and the outer surface has additional material, which thereby interrupts the smoothness and constant radius of the rest of the outer face of the diaphragm, the diaphragm


41


has the desired tendency to remain in the empty-chamber position while being unstable in the filled-chamber position.




By positioning this additional material


43


near the outlet mouth


57


of the pressure-conduction chamber


50


, the collapse of the diaphragm


41


from its filled-chamber can be somewhat controlled so that the diaphragm tends to collapse first in the lower portion of the pressure-conduction chamber near the outer mouth


57


before further collapsing in the upper region of the pressure conduction chamber nearer the inlet mouth


56


. The cassette is preferably mounted in the control unit with a slight tilt so that the passage


36


is vertical and the inlet mouth


56


is at the very top of the chamber


50


and the outlet mouth


57


is at the very bottom of the chamber


50


. This orientation permits the bubbles that may be present in the chamber


50


to gravitate towards the inlet mouth


56


, which is at the top of the chamber. In a preferred method of eliminating the bubbles from the IV fluid, as described in the above-referenced, concurrently filed application for “Intravenous-Line Air-Elimination System,” any bubbles that are detected by the control unit in the pressure conduction chamber


50


are forced by pressure from the control unit against the external surface of the membrane


41


up to the inlet mouth


56


to the cassette inlet


31


up the IV line to the fluid source, sometimes after several purging and filling cycles. When purging the bubbles from the chamber


50


through the inlet mouth


56


it is preferred that the chamber collapse at its bottom first so that the membrane does not interfere with bubbles moving upwards through the chamber


50


.




Thus, the additional material


43


creates an instability in the membrane


41


when the membrane is in the filled-chamber position, thereby making the membrane more likely to collapse from the filled-chamber position than a membrane that did not have the additional material. The additional material


43


, however, does not create an instability in the membrane


41


when the membrane is in the empty-chamber position. In many situations it is desirable to be able to introduce some instability into the membrane when the membrane is in the empty-chamber position. By introducing such instability into the membrane, less negative pressure is needed to move the membrane from its empty-chamber position.




To create an instability in the empty-chamber position, a pressure-relief tab


143


may be added to the membrane


141


as shown in FIG.


26


. The pressure-relief tab


143


extends from the exterior surface


145


near the edge of the membrane


141


, as can be seen in the cross-sectional view of FIG.


29


.

FIG. 28

shows another cross-sectional view, which view does not pass through the pressure-relief tab


143


, and

FIG. 27

shows a front view of the membrane


141


. The tab


143


may be actuated by an actuator


149


(shown in

FIG. 30

) mounted in the control unit. When it is desired to introduce instability into the membrane—which will typically be whenever it is desired to fill a previously empty chamber


50


—the actuator


143


forces the tab


143


towards the O-ring


144


. This action pulls the portion of the membrane


141


near the tab


143


away from the cassette's rigid wall, which partially defines the pressure-conduction chamber


50


. The tab


143


is located near the inlet mouth of the chamber


50


so that, when the actuator


149


pulls a portion of the membrane


141


away from the rigid wall, a pocket of space is formed into which the fluid can flow. By supplying a negative pressure to the exterior surface


145


of the membrane


141


, the control unit may cause more liquid to be drawn into the pressure-conduction chamber


50


. Less negative pressure is needed to move the membrane


141


out of the empty-chamber position, when the actuator


149


has urged the tab


143


towards the O-ring


144


and the rigid portion


117


of the cassette adjacent the tab


143


.




If it is desired to make the membrane


141


stable in the empty-chamber position, the control unit may cause the actuator


149


to be returned to the non-actuating position, so that the tab


143


may return to its normal position, extending outwardly from the cassette. As noted above, when the membrane is in the empty-chamber position, IV fluid may flow through the pressure-conduction chamber


50


through a conduit defined by raised portion of the rear wall (see

FIGS. 3

,


5


and


6


) and leading from the inlet mouth of the pressure-conduction chamber


50


to the outlet mouth of the pressure-conduction chamber.




The pressure-reduction tab


143


also creates an instability in the filled-chamber position. When the pressure-conduction chamber


50


is filled with liquid, the exterior surface


145


of the membrane


141


becomes convex, rotating the tab


143


towards the O-ring


144


, so that the tab


143


is urged against the rigid portion


117


of the cassette. In this position, the tab


143


creates pressure on a portion of the membrane


141


so as to make the membrane less stable in the filled-chamber position so that the control unit needs to create less positive pressure to collapse the membrane


141


from its filled-chamber position.





FIG. 31

shows a cassette


215


that may be used in a bed-side pharmacy system, such as that described in the concurrently filed patent application for “System, Method and Cassette for Mixing and Delivering Intravenous Drugs” bearing assigned Ser. No. 08/916,890, and which lists Kamen, Grinnell, Mandro, Gilbreath, Grant, Demers, Larkins and Manning as inventors, now abandoned in favor of continuation-in-part application, assigned Ser. No. 09/137,025 which application is incorporated herein by reference. Such a cassette may also use a membrane


241


having a pressure-reduction tab


243


, which creates some instability in the filled-chamber position and which may be actuated to create some instability in the empty-chamber position.




Returning to the cassette


15


shown in

FIGS. 1-3

, a preferred membrane design for the second membrane-based valve


7


is shown in

FIGS. 18 and 19

. This membrane has an O-ring


78


for mounting and sealing the inlet; membrane onto the cassette (like the lip


44


on the membrane


41


for the pressure-conduction chamber, and like the circular membrane, which is not shown, for the first membrane-based valve


6


). This membrane has a first portion


71


, which is used to seal off the inlet mouth


73


located on protrusion


72


(see FIG.


5


). The control unit


10


exerts a pressure against this portion of the membrane


71


mechanically, in order to close off the valve


7


. A second compliant portion


74


of the membrane is sufficiently compliant so that when the control valve


2


is sufficiently restricting flow out of the outlet


76


of the second membrane-based valve


7


, the compliant portion


74


of the membrane will expand outwardly so as to hold, under pressure, a volume of IV fluid. This design is desirable so that when the inlet mouth


73


is closed, because the pressure-conduction chamber needs to be refilled, the fluid stored in the valving chamber (item


75


in

FIG. 5

) is available to be dispensed through the control valve


2


.





FIG. 20

shows a schematic for an electrical model of the operation of the second membrane-based valve


7


working in conjunction with the stopcock-type control valve


20


. When the valve leading from the outlet


57


of the pressure-conduction chamber


50


is open, permitting flow from the pressure-conduction chamber through valve


7


, and if the stopcock valve


20


is set to provide a large amount of resistance to the flow from valve


7


to the patient, the valving chamber


75


and its corresponding compliant membrane portion


74


can accumulate a “charge” of fluid, much like a capacitor, as shown in FIG.


20


. When first portion


71


is then urged against inlet mouth


73


closing off flow from the pressure-conduction chamber


50


, the charge of fluid in the valving chamber


75


is urged by the compliant membrane portion


74


to continue flow through the stopcock valve


20


. As fluid exits the valving chamber


75


, the pressure of the fluid decreases as the compliant portion


74


of the membrane returns to its unstretched state.

FIG. 21

shows a graph depicting the pressure of the IV fluid being delivered to a patient over time as outlet valve


71


,


73


is closed at time t


1


and reopened at t


2


. A solid line depicts the pressure to the patient without a compliant membrane portion


74


design. With a compliant membrane portion


74


, the sharp drop off in pressure at t


1


is eliminated or ameliorated. If the stopcock valve is nearly closed so that only a small trickle of fluid is allowed to flow through it, the design of the compliant membrane portion


74


will greatly smooth out the delivery of fluid, as long as the time between t


1


and t


2


is not too long. When the stopcock valve


2


is fully open a sharp drop in pressure may still be expected at time t


1


.




As noted above (and as described in the above-referenced U.S. Pat. No. 5,713,865, entitled “Intravenous-Line Air-Elimination System”), when an air bubble is being purged from the pressure-conduction chamber


50


, it is preferably forced up through the chamber's inlet valve


56


(which in this air-elimination mode is acting as an outlet). Preferably, the inlet port


56


is shaped so that a small bubble will not tend to stick to an edge of the port while allowing liquid to flow past it. To prevent such sticking of a small bubble, the port


56


preferably flares out so that the corner where the port


56


meets the inner wall of the pressure-conduction chamber


50


is greater than 90°, making the corner less likely a place where the bubble will stick. However, the mouth of the port


56


cannot =be so large that liquid can easily flow by the bubble when fluid is exiting the pressure-conduction through the port


56


. In order to accomplish this, the port must be sized and shaped so that the surface tension of the IV fluid being forced upward from the pressure-conduction chamber


50


forces a bubble located at the port


56


up through the inlet valve


6


. It is also preferable that the port


56


be sized and shaped so that when liquid is pulled back into the pressure-conduction chamber


50


, the bubble can hover near the port as liquid passes around it. A preferred inlet port


56


shape is shown in

FIGS. 22 and 23

. The port's size increases from the end


57


that connects to the IV line's upper portion to the end


58


leading into the pressure-conduction chamber.

FIG. 24

shows a cross-section of the inlet valve


56


. It has been found that providing an inlet port to the pressure-conduction chamber with this shape improves the air-elimination system's ability to purge bubbles from the chamber. Using a port such as that shown in

FIGS. 22-24

in conjunction with the membrane


41


of

FIGS. 15-17

helps force bubbles more quickly out of the pressure-conduction chamber when attempting to purge the bubbles back through the cassette's inlet


31


to the IV source.





FIG. 25

shows a preferred arrangement of teeth around the circumference


29


of the control wheel


20


. The teeth provide means for a gear in the control unit


10


to engage securely the control wheel's circumference-in particular, a gear that is used to prevent the free flow of fluid through the cassette when the cassette is removed from the control unit


10


. When the door


102


of the control unit


10


is being opened, the gear turns the control wheel


20


to close the stopcock-type valve


2


, thereby stopping all flow through the cassette and preventing free flow. To ensure that the gear does not continue turning the wheel


20


once the valve


2


has been closed off entirely, a sector


92


along the wheel's circumference is left free of teeth. When the wheel


20


is turned enough so that the gear is adjacent this toothless sector


92


, the valve


2


is fully closed. The lack of teeth prevents the gear from continuing to turn the wheel; thus, the wheel cannot be turned too much.




Although the invention has been described with reference to several preferred embodiments, it will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention, as set forth in the claims hereinbelow.



Claims
  • 1. A valve for smoothing the delivery of intravenous fluid from a source to a patient comprising:an occludable inlet mouth; an expandable valving chamber disposed downstream from and in fluid communication with the inlet mouth; and a restrictive outlet mouth disposed downstream from and in fluid communication with the expandable valving chamber, wherein the outlet mouth is capable of variably restricting delivery to the patient by providing alternatively (i) a fully open position, (ii) a partially open position and (iii) a closed position; so that the chamber is expandable to accept and hold under pressure a charge of fluid via the inlet mouth when the outlet mouth sufficiently restricts delivery, and so that the charge is capable of delivery to the patient when the inlet mouth is occluded, the chamber applying pressure on the charge while returning to an unstretched state such that the charge is urged to continue flowing through the outlet mouth.
  • 2. A valve according to claim 1 further comprising:a compliant membrane, the membrane defining the expandable valving chamber.
  • 3. A valve according to claim 2, wherein a portion of the compliant membrane is capable of occluding the inlet mouth.
  • 4. A membrane-based valve for smoothing the delivery of intravenous fluid from a source to a patient comprising:a rigid housing, the housing providing a first passage, a first mouth, a second passage, a second mouth; and a compliant membrane; the housing and the compliant membrane coupled, defining a valving chamber; the first passage entering the valving chamber at the first mouth such that flow of fluid via the first passage into the chamber is capable of being prevented when the compliant membrane is forced against the first mouth, the second passage exiting the valving chamber at the second mouth so that a charge of fluid is capable of being urged by the compliant membrane to continue flow from the valving chamber into the second passage via the second mouth and may be provided to the patient when the compliant membrane is forced against the first mouth.
  • 5. A valve according to claim 4, wherein the first mouth is located at an end of a protrusion provided by the rigid housing, the protrusion extending into the valving chamber towards the compliant membrane.
  • 6. A valve comprising:an occludable inlet mouth; a valving chamber disposed downstream from and in fluid communication with the inlet mouth, the valving chamber capable of expanding so as to accept and retain a charge of fluid under pressure; and an outlet mouth disposed downstream from and in fluid communication with the valving chamber, so that the charge of fluid is urged, while the valving chamber is returning to its unstretched state, to flow therethrough when the inlet mouth is occluded, the outlet mouth capable of variably restricting delivery to the patient by providing alternatively (i) a fully open position, (ii) a partially open position and (iii) a closed position.
  • 7. A valve according to claim 6, wherein the valving chamber is defined by a membrane.
  • 8. A valve according to claim 7, wherein a portion of the membrane is capable of occluding the inlet mouth.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/917,537 filed Aug. 22, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,165,154 which, in turn, is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/478,065 filed Jun. 7, 1995, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,755,683 on May 26, 1998, which was concurrently filed with applications Ser. No. 08/472,212, entitled “Intravenous-Line Flow-Control System” for an invention by Heinzmann, Kamen, Lanigan, Larkins, Lund and Manning, which issued on Jun. 30, 1998 as U.S. Pat. No. 5,722,637; Ser. No. 08/481,606, entitled “Intravenous-Line Air-Elimination System” for an invention by Manning, Larkins, Houle, Kamen and Faust, which issued on Feb. 3, 1998 as U.S. Pat. No. 5,713,865; and Ser. No. 08/477,380, entitled “Intravenous-Line Air-Detection System” for an invention by Larkins, Beavis and Kamen, which issued on Jun. 24, 1997 as U.S. Pat. No. 5,641,892. All of these related applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (23)
Number Name Date Kind
1792906 Neilos Feb 1931 A
2526017 Figg Oct 1950 A
2902253 Page Sep 1959 A
3540694 Cornelius Nov 1970 A
3722858 Sugimoto et al. Mar 1973 A
3727882 Burris et al. Apr 1973 A
4230300 Wiltse Oct 1980 A
4648868 Hardwick et al. Mar 1987 A
4667927 Oscarsson May 1987 A
4807660 Aslanian Feb 1989 A
5005604 Aslanian Apr 1991 A
5045068 Kawai et al. Sep 1991 A
5088515 Kamen Feb 1992 A
5113904 Aslanian May 1992 A
5156186 Manska Oct 1992 A
5193990 Kamen et al. Mar 1993 A
5241985 Faust et al. Sep 1993 A
5364371 Kamen Nov 1994 A
5378126 Abrahamson et al. Jan 1995 A
5584671 Schweitzer, Jr. et al. Dec 1996 A
5649810 Schweitzer, Jr. et al. Jul 1997 A
5816779 Lawless et al. Oct 1998 A
6364857 Gray et al. Apr 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
535179 Feb 1955 BE
58977 Nov 1890 DE
0 222 088 May 1987 EP
0 293 592 Dec 1988 EP
2138617 Mar 1972 FR
2340491 Feb 1976 FR
2 053 378 Feb 1981 GB
WO 9216304 Oct 1992 WO
9323096 Nov 1993 WO
9427669 Dec 1994 WO
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/478065 Jun 1995 US
Child 08/917537 US