Patent Application
20070095113
1. Field of the Invention
The field of the invention relates to security lock devices. Specifically, this invention is designed to prevent individuals from tampering with gas and water supplies by locking the shut-off valve mechanism and preventing unwanted access, while indicating the statues of the protected valve, which remains in the position, open or shut, that is has when the invention is applied.
2. Description of Related Art
Throughout the United States, water and gas are supplied to households, apartment buildings and commercial buildings through a series of intricate pipeline systems. All of these pipelines utilize shut-off valves for the purpose of eliminating the flow of water or gas in an emergency or when the pipeline needs to be repaired. In emergency situations such as a fire or explosion, the valves are also used to control the flow of water out of the pipeline when required by the fire department. Due to the important functions of such valves, there is a growing need to protect them from acts of terrorism and vandalism.
Vandalizing of the valves could result in drastic consequences if emergency situations should arise. The inability to shut down a particular gas or water pipeline that contains a leak could result severe property damage or physical injury. Water pipelines have a tendency to burst or leak and could cause flooding and property damage if there is no way to turn off the flow of water. In addition, a severe gas leak could lead to a major health and safety issue. Continued exposure to methane eventually leads to depletion of oxygen levels and eventual suffocation and increased methane levels create a greater likelihood of an explosion.
Terrorists could attempt to disable the water valves and destroy important industrial areas such as railroads and refineries by starting fires and creating explosions. The inability to obtain water from the pipelines immediately could result in increased damage and destruction to the particular industrial site. In addition, it could result in a greater loss of life due to increased flames from the inability to put the fire out quickly. In response to these concerns, prior art has attempted to solve these problems.
For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,354,116 issued on Mar. 12, 2002 to inventor Drake discloses a small valve cover, with built in locking mechanism, to be used for locking gas pipelines at individual homes. Although this accomplishes the same end result, the prior art does not operate in the same way as the present invention and it is unsuitable for large scale pipelines.
Another attempt to remedy the problem can be observed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,354,116 issued May 28, 1929 to P. S. Douglas. This discloses a valve locking device which prevents the operation of a valve handle so that the position of the wheel valve cannot be altered. This is accomplished by mounting a locking device on the valve body, so that the locking device swings down upon and engages the valve operating wheel with a pair of stops extending downward between spokes of the valve operating wheel. Although this is a viable way to prevent the tampering of such devices, this wheel-based protection system is extremely expensive and cumbersome.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,469,724 issued Nov. 28, 1995 to Jerry Pollard discloses a fire hydrant locking device that prevents the operating nut from being accessed while not in use. The operating nut is secured through a metal arm and pad lock. This prior art fails to provide a viable means for securing an operating valve which employs a hand wheel.
Finally, U.S. Pat. No. 4,964,613 issued Oct. 23, 1990 to Timothy Logman and later assigned to the Meuller Co. of Decatur, Ill. discloses a modern day hand valve that would utilize the present invention. The prior art discloses a valve assembly having a bonnet with a nut element and valve status indicator disk at its upper end and a through passage within said nut element and said valve status indicator disk for the attachment of an operating stem. This prior art fails to provide as sufficient security means for preventing tampering with such devices.
A problem common to all of the prior art is that each invention fails to provide a safe and inexpensive security means for protecting the emergency shut-off valves associated with water and gas pipelines. The present invention provides a simple and innovative way of protecting these valves from vandalism and terrorism. Since it is composed of a sturdy, inexpensive material, industries can utilize these protective devices rather than employ a more expensive wheel handle system with a less secure padlock.
The present invention consists of a rectangular, elongated padlock attachment member with a square base connected to said member forming a T-shaped security device. The square base is hollow and its dimensions allow the T-shaped device to fit snugly over a nut or other valve connection of a shut-off valve. Preferably, the device is composed of hardened steel or some other strong, sturdy metal, and it is thick enough to have a tensile strength of at least 300 lbs. This prevents the valves and hand wheels from being tampered with or damaged.
It is therefore, the object of the present invention to provide an improved valve security device to prevent terrorists or vandals from tampering or damaging said device.
Another object of the present invention is to create a durable, strong valve security device that is capable of enduring exterior forces of 300 lbs. or greater
Another object of the invention is to provide a device, which may be detachably secured to a hand wheel attachment and locked to prevent manipulation of the valve.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a valve security device, which is simple in design and inexpensive to construct, is durable and rugged in structure, and can be easily fit or retrofit to new and existing hand wheel attachment.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a valve security device which secures and protects the valve, but which can be removed quickly and easily when access is needed for municipal use.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following descriptions, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein, by way of illustration and example, an embodiment of the present invention is disclosed.
a is a side view of the nut element for the operating stem attachment of the valve assembly, after the T-shaped locking device of the current invention has been attached atop of the nut element.
Detailed descriptions of the preferred embodiment are provided herein. It is to be understood, however, that the present invention may be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but rather as a basis for the claims and as representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to employ the present invention in virtually any appropriately detailed system, structure or manner.
Referring to
Attached to the apex of the bonnet 4 is a nut element 10 with an attached valve status indicator disk 8. The valve status indicator disk 8 allows the user to determine if the valve assembly 2 is in an open or closed position. Within said nut element 10 and said valve status indicator disk 8 is a through passage 14 that allows the operating stem 16 to extend into said bonnet 4. The operating stem 16 ultimately controls the operation of the valve assembly 2. At the exposed portion of the operating stem 16 is a hand wheel 18, which allows the user to open and close the valve through the operating stem 16. In order to utilize the present invention, the yoke 12, with attached operating stem 16 and hand wheel 18, is unbolted and removed from the valve assembly 2.
Referring to
As illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
The current invention is designed to comply with all current fire codes, including the NFPA, thee Los Angeles Fire District code, and other national and regional fire codes.
While the invention has been described in connection with a preferred embodiment or embodiments, it is not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular form set forth, but on the contrary, it is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
