This disclosure relates in general to valve assemblies, and in particular, to systems and methods for conversions between manual and actuated valves.
In oil and gas production, various tubulars, valves, and instrumentation systems may be used to direct fluids into and out of a wellhead. For example, in hydraulic fracturing operations, frac trees may be arranged at the wellhead and include pipe spools and various valves to direct hydraulic fracturing fluid into the wellbore. These valves may be actuated valves, which are significantly more expensive than manually operated valves. If several trees are arranged proximate one another, fracturing may be done in series, with one frac tree being utilized before a second frac tree is used. As a result, significant expense is expended on hydraulic systems and actuated valves that are not in use during large portions of fracturing operations.
Applicants recognized the problems noted above herein and conceived and developed embodiments of systems and methods, according to the present disclosure, for fracturing operations.
In an embodiment a method for conducting hydraulic fracturing operations includes positioning a plurality of fracturing trees at well site, the well site associated with hydraulic fracturing operations. The method also includes including a first valve on a first fracturing tree of the plurality of fracturing trees, the first valve being coupled to an actuator to control operation of the first valve and operated remotely by an operator that is not within a predetermined proximity of the first fracturing tree. The method further includes performing hydraulic fracturing operations through the first tree. The method also includes removing the actuator from the first valve after fracturing operations through the first tree are complete. The method includes installing the actuator on a second valve on a second fracturing tree of the plurality of trees. The method also includes performing hydraulic fracturing operations through the second tree.
In another embodiment a method of replacing valve operation methods during fracturing operations includes installing a first operator on a first valve of a first fracturing tree, the first operator being an actuator that controls operation of the first valve. The method also includes installing a second operator on a second valve of a second fracturing tree, the second fracturing tree being adjacent the first fracturing tree, and the second operator being a manual operator that is controlled by physical control with the manual operator. The method further includes performing hydraulic fracturing operations using the first fracturing tree. The method includes completing hydraulic fracturing operations using the first fracturing tree. The method also includes removing the first operator from the first valve, the first valve maintaining a position on the first fracturing tree after the first operator is removed. The method further includes removing the second operator from the second valve, the second valve maintaining a position on the second fracturing tree after the second operator is removed. The method also includes installing the first operator on the second valve after the first operator is removed from the first valve and after the second operator is removed from the second valve.
In an embodiment a method for performing hydraulic fracturing operations includes positioning a first fracturing tree at a well site, the first fracturing tree including a first valve controlling a first flow through the first fracturing tree. The method also includes positioning a second fracturing tree at the well site, the second fracturing tree including a second valve controlling a second flow through the second fracturing tree, the second fracturing tree being positioned adjacent the first fracturing tree such that access to the second fracturing tree is restricted while the first fracturing tree is in use. The method further includes performing hydraulic fracturing operations through the first fracturing tree. The method also includes removing a first operator from the first valve, the first valve maintaining a position on the first fracturing tree after the first operator is removed, and the first operator being an actuator. The method includes removing a second operator from the second valve, the second valve maintaining a position on the second fracturing tree after the second operator is removed, and the second operator being a manual operator. The method further includes installing the first operator on the second valve after the first operator is removed from the first valve and after the second operator is removed from the second valve. The method also includes performing hydraulic fracturing operations through the second fracturing tree.
The present technology will be better understood on reading the following detailed description of non-limiting embodiments thereof, and on examining the accompanying drawings, in which:
The foregoing aspects, features and advantages of the present technology will be further appreciated when considered with reference to the following description of preferred embodiments and accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals represent like elements. In describing the preferred embodiments of the technology illustrated in the appended drawings, specific terminology will be used for the sake of clarity. The present technology, however, is not intended to be limited to the specific terms used, and it is to be understood that each specific term includes equivalents that operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose.
When introducing elements of various embodiments of the present invention, the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements. Any examples of operating parameters and/or environmental conditions are not exclusive of other parameters/conditions of the disclosed embodiments. Additionally, it should be understood that references to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “certain embodiments,” or “other embodiments” of the present invention are not intended to be interpreted as excluding the existence of additional embodiments that also incorporate the recited features. Furthermore, reference to terms such as “above,” “below,” “upper”, “lower”, “side”, “front,” “back,” or other terms regarding orientation are made with reference to the illustrated embodiments and are not intended to be limiting or exclude other orientations.
Embodiments of the present disclosure include systems and methods for converting actuated values into manually operated valves and for utilizing such a conversion at a fracturing site to increase asset utilization while reducing non-productive time of value added systems. In various embodiments, a valve converter is utilized to convert an actuated valve (e.g., hydraulic, pneumatic, etc.) to a manual valve (e.g., hand wheel). The valve converter may include a rotary to linear converter and/or a bearing system to translate rotational movement of a hand wheel into linear movement to drive a valve stem between an open position and a closed position. In various embodiments, the conversion on the valves may be utilized during fracturing operations. For example, in various embodiments, fracturing trees may be arranged proximate one another. During operations, a single tree may be in use while the others are not. That is, there may be a predetermined distance where operators may not enter during ongoing fracturing operations. The in use tree may utilize the actuated valves to enable fast and efficient opening/closing during fracturing operations. The actuated valves may be considered remotely operated, in that physical contact between an operator and the valves is not used to control operation of the valve. After operations are complete, the actuators for driving the valves may be moved to different trees and different valves, thereby reducing the cost associated with fracturing operations. That is, the actuators and accompanying valves may be considered high value assets due to their cost and efficiency. Reducing their non-productive time, for example by not including actuated valves on trees that are not in use, may reduce costs for operators. Accordingly, systems and methods of the present embodiment may be utilized to use actuators and actuated valves on in-use trees while converting out of use trees into manually operated valves.
In various embodiments, monitoring equipment 40 can be mounted on a control vehicle 42, and connected to, e.g., the pumps 12, blender 34, the trees 16, and other downhole sensors and tools (not shown) to provide information to an operator, and to allow the operator to control different parameters of the fracturing operation.
The illustrated removable operator 52 includes an operator housing 62 having lugs 64 extending radially inward. The upper end 60 of the bonnet assembly 54 includes a flange 66 that includes lugs 68 having grooves positioned therebetween. In operator, the lugs 64 may be lowered through the grooves and into a cavity 70. Once in the cavity 70, the operator housing 62 may be rotated to at least partially align with the lugs 68 of the flange 66. The alignment of the lugs 64, 68 blocks axial movement of the operator housing 62.
As shown in
In various embodiments, an actuated valve may drive axial movement of the valve stem 72 along the axis 76. That is, the main driver may move with the valve stem 72. In contrast, a manually operated valve, for example via a hand wheel, will apply a rotational force that moves the valve stem 72 along the axis 76. In other words, the main driver is linearly stationary relative to the valve stem 72. The illustrated rotary to linear converter 74 enables the rotational movement of from the manual operator to be applied to the valve stem 72 without modifying the valve stem 72. For example, the rotary to linear converter 74 may be a jack screw, worm gear, ball screw, or the like that facilitates conversion of a rotary movement to a linear movement. Furthermore, the illustrated rotary to linear converter 74 may include a self-locking feature. As a result, constant pressure/rotational force to the hand wheel will not be necessary to maintain the position of the valve stem 72.
The embodiment illustrated in
In various embodiments, the manual operator is a hand wheel 82, which may be affixed to an end of the rotary to linear converter 74. The hand wheel 82 may be pre-coupled to the operator housing 62 such that the system as a whole may be installed. For example, the removable operator 52 may include a variety of components and be removable such that the valve stem 72 remains coupled to the bonnet assembly 54. Additionally, the removable operator 52 associated with an actuator, such as a hydraulic actuator, may also be available. As a result, the two removable operators 52 may be swapped out without making other modifications to the valve 50, such as reworking or adjusting the valve stem 72. In this manner, the actuator may be moved to frac trees that are in operation, allowing cheaper manually operated valves to be used on trees that are not currently in operation.
In various embodiments, other components may be incorporated into the removable operator 52 to facilitate connections and switching. For instance, various couplings to enable connections to secondary systems may be included. Furthermore, valves typically have the nomenclature that a clockwise turn will bring the valve toward a closed position and a counter-clockwise turn will bring the valve toward an opened position. However, actuated valves typically have a reverse action gate, while manual valves have a direct gate. Accordingly, in certain embodiments, the rotatory to linear converter may include a left-handed thread to enable clockwise movement to drive the valve to the closed position. As a result, the status quo will be maintained and the likelihood of confusion for operators in the field is reduced. In this manner, actuated valves may be quickly and efficiently converted to manual valves.
As described above, and by way of example only, in hydraulic fracturing operations, operators may perform operations on multiple trees in different stages. If each tree includes a number of actuators for controlling the valves, costs may increase exponentially. Moreover, each tree may not be in operation at the same time, thereby creating a redundancy. The following example will be illustrated on a four stage fracturing operation using four trees. It should be appreciated that any number of stages and trees may be utilized with embodiments of the present disclosure.
The illustrated embodiment includes trees 16A-16D. Each tree 16 is associated with a respective wellhead (not pictured) and includes a lower master valve 90A-D, wing valves 92A-D, swab valves 94A-D, and other valves 50A-D. It should be appreciated that the systems and methods described herein may be utilized with any of the valves associated with the respective trees 16. As described above, the trees 16 receive hydraulic fracturing fluid, for example from the missile 20, which is directed into the well via the trees 16. The valves associated with the trees 16 may be utilized to block or restrict flow into the well. It should be appreciated that other components are illustrated in
While embodiments of the present disclosure describing using the removable operators 52 for modifying the operation of the valves, in other embodiments, different methods or configurations may be utilized to swap out the actuated and manual operators. For example, the trees may include a double block system where each tree 16 includes a set of manual block valves and the actuated valves are moved from tree 16 to tree 16 by clearing and blocking in the manual block valves between the actuated block valves and the tree. As illustrated in
Performing operations in the manner described above significantly reduces the cost of the equipment to perform the operations. In embodiments where the actuated valves are hydraulically actuated valves, hydraulic systems (which may include a generator, pumps, and accumulator for each system, as well as the actuators) may not be used for each tree and therefore a single hydraulic system may be used to perform operations on the four trees. Using a single system both reduces costs and non-productive time for the equipment. Utilizing the quick disconnecting features of the equipment also maintains the time efficiency of the operations, therefore decreasing costs while maintaining or improving production downtime. Additionally, this method of operations is flexible where any combination of hydraulic and operator systems to decrease conversion time and improve efficiency may be used.
After the valves have been swapped, fracturing operations may commence through the tree 16 that has acquired the actuators (block 118). Upon complete of the fracturing operations through the tree 16, the remaining trees 16 may be checked to determine whether fracturing operations are complete (operator 120). If they are, the method may end 112. If not, the operation methods may be swapped to a different tree 16 for further fracturing operations (124).
Although the technology herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present technology. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present technology as defined by the appended claims.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of: co-pending U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/500,851 filed May 3, 2017, titled “Valve Operation and Rapid Conversion System and Method,” the full disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62500851 | May 2017 | US |