Embodiments described relate to valve assemblies for positive displacement pumps used in high pressure applications. In particular, embodiments of a conformable valve seal or insert and configurations of a valve seat are described to make up a valve-seat interface.
Positive displacement pumps are often employed at oilfields for large high pressure applications involved in hydrocarbon recovery efforts. A positive displacement pump may include a plunger driven by a crankshaft toward and away from a chamber in order to dramatically effect a high or low pressure on the chamber. This makes it a good choice for high pressure applications. Indeed, where fluid pressure exceeding a few thousand pounds per square inch (PSI) is to be generated, a positive displacement pump is generally employed.
Positive displacement pumps may be configured of fairly large sizes and employed in a variety of large scale oilfield operations such as cementing, coil tubing, water jet cutting, or hydraulic fracturing of underground rock. Hydraulic fracturing of underground rock, for example, often takes place at pressures of 10,000 to 15,000 PSI or more to direct an abrasive containing fluid through a well to release oil and gas from rock pores for extraction. Such pressures and large scale applications are readily satisfied by positive displacement pumps.
As is often the case with large systems and industrial equipment, regular monitoring and maintenance of positive displacement pumps may be sought to help ensure uptime and increase efficiency. In the case of hydraulic fracturing applications, a pump may be employed at a well and operating for an extended period of time, say six to twelve hours per day for more than a week. Over this time, the pump may be susceptible to wearing components such as the development of internal valve leaks. This is particularly of concern at conformable valve inserts used at the interface of the valve and valve seat. Therefore, during downtime in the operation, the pump may be manually inspected externally or taken apart to examine the internal condition of the valves and inserts. In many cases the external manual inspection fails to reveal defects. Alternatively, once the time is taken to remove valves for inspection, they are often replaced wholesale regardless of operating condition, whether out of habit or for a lack of certainty. Thus, there is the risk that the pump will either fail while in use for undiagnosed leaky valves or that effectively operable valves and inserts will be needlessly discarded.
The significance of risks such as those described above may increase depending on the circumstances. In the case of hydraulic fracturing applications, such as those noted above, conditions may be present that can both increase the likelihood of pump failure and increase the overall negative impact of such a failure. For example, the conformable nature of the valve insert is that it tends to bulge and wear at the edges over time due to repeated striking of the valve seat. Additionally, the use of an abrasive containing fluid in hydraulic fracturing not only breaks up underground rock, as described above, it also tends to degrade the conformable valve inserts over time as abrasive particles are sandwiched between the inserts and the valve seat as the valve repeatedly strikes the seat. Such degradation and eventual leakage may result in failure to seal the chamber of the pump, perhaps within about one to six weeks of use depending on the particular parameters of the application. Once the chamber fails to seal during operation, the pump will generally fail in relatively short order.
Furthermore, the ramifications of such an individual pump failure may ultimately be quite extensive. That is, hydraulic fracturing applications generally employ several positive displacement pumps at any given well. Malfunctioning of even a single one of these pumps places added strain on the remaining pumps, perhaps even leading to failure of additional pumps. Unfortunately, this type of cascading pump failure, from pump to pump to pump, is not an uncommon event where hydraulic fracturing applications are concerned.
Given the ramifications of positive displacement pump failure and the demand for employing techniques that avoid pump disassembly as described above, efforts have been made to evaluate the condition of a positive displacement pump during operation without taking it apart for inspection. For example, a positive displacement pump may be evaluated during operation by employing an acoustic sensor coupled to the pump. The acoustic sensor may be used to detect high-frequency vibrations that are the result of a leak or incomplete seal within the chamber of the positive displacement pump, such a leak being the precursor to pump failure as noted above.
Unfortunately, reliance on the detection of acoustic data in order to address developing leaks at the valve-seat interface as described above fails to avoid the development of leaks in an operating pump. That is, acoustic data may do no more than provide an early indicator of potential leaks. While this may afford an operator time to take the pump off-line in order to address the potential leak, there remains no effective manner in which to avoid the leak in the first place without the need of taking the pump off-line. Thus, at a minimum, even where a catastrophic leak is avoided due to early acoustic detection, down time for the pump at issue still results. There remains no substantially effective manner in which to avoid leaks at the valve-seat interface in an operating positive displacement pump for which abrasives are pumped and a conformable valve insert is employed.
A pump assembly is provided. The pump assembly has a valve-seat interface with a valve having a conformable valve insert about the valve and a valve seat defining a fluid path through the assembly. The conformable valve insert is configured for striking the valve seat for closing the fluid path and includes a circumferential component to accommodate deformation thereof upon the striking of the conformable valve insert upon the valve seat.
Embodiments are described with reference to certain high pressure positive displacement pump assemblies for fracturing operations. However, other positive displacement pumps may be employed. Regardless, embodiments described herein employ a valve-seat interface wherein a valve or a valve seat are configured with a component for accommodating the deformation of the valve or seat upon a striking of the valve upon the valve seat.
Referring to
As indicated, the conformable valve insert 101 depicted in
The reduced profile of the conformable valve insert 101 provided by the concave surface 150 is present about the entire circumference of the insert 101 providing the appearance of a groove at its surface. As such, when the valve insert 101 strikes against the valve seat 385 as shown in
Continuing with reference to
In addition to contacting the valve seat 385 of
In fact, the benefits of this manner of striking between the valve seat 385 and the valve 100 may also be imparted to the strike face 281 and the valve seat 385 to a degree. That is, due to the extension of the rounded abutment 175 to below the diagonal line ii-ii as described above, the impact of a given strike is initially felt at the insert 101, thereby reducing the degree of impact between the strike face 281 and the valve seat 385 during the strike. Thus, the circumferential component of a rounded abutment 175 provides stress reduction to the valve-seat interface in terms of the valve insert 101, the valve 100, and the valve seat 385.
Continuing with reference to
Referring now to
The above described plunger 390 also effects a low pressure on the chamber 335. That is, as the plunger 390 retreats away from an advanced position near the chamber 335, the pressure therein will decrease. As the pressure decreases, the discharge valve 350 will strike closed against the discharge valve seat 380 as depicted in
As described above, a reciprocating or cycling motion of the plunger 390 toward and away from the chamber 335 within the pump assembly 310 controls pressure therein. The valves 350 and 100 respond accordingly in order to dispense fluid from the chamber 335 at high pressure and draw additional fluid into the chamber 335. As part of this cycling of the pump assembly 310 repeated striking of the discharge valve 350 against a discharge valve seat 380 and of the intake valve 100 against the intake valve seat 385 occurs. However, due to the configurations of conformable valve inserts 101, 301 and other features of each valve-seat interface, as detailed above and further below, the useful life of the inserts 101, 301 may be substantially extended. This may be of cascading beneficial effect to the life of the valves 100, 350, the pump assembly 310 itself, and even neighboring assemblies 600 as described further below (see
Continuing with reference to
With reference to
With reference to
Continuing again with reference to
However, of potentially greater significance, is the fact that a seat insert 400, 500 of conformable material aligning with a valve insert 101, 301 of conformable material may help to avoid the imparting of abrasive forces of proppant or particulate into the valve insert 101, 301 during a valve strike. For example, with reference to
Continuing with additional reference to
Indeed the robust region 450, 551 may even be configured to wear at a rate that does not substantially exceed the rate of wear in an adjacent region making contact with the valve insert 101, 301. That is, the valve insert 101, 301 may be of a conformable material as noted, imparting only limited stress and wear on such an adjacent region of the valve seat 380, 385. In the embodiment shown, such an adjacent region would be at the seat insert 400, 500. However, even in circumstances where no conformable seat insert 400, 500 is employed, a robust region 450, 551 of greater robustness than its adjacent region may be employed so as to avoid significant differences in the rate of wear between the robust region 450, 551 and its adjacent region. In one embodiment, the robust region 450, 551 may be of tungsten carbide or a ceramic material of greater abrasion resistance than its adjacent region. Similarly, the adjacent region may be of a hardened steel or a polymer such as urethane, as in the case of the seat insert 400, 500 detailed above.
Continuing now with reference to
In addition to the six pump assemblies 310, 600 shown, other equipment may be directly or indirectly coupled to the well head 650 for the operation. This may include a manifold 675 for fluid communication between the assemblies 310, 600. A blender 690 and other equipment may also be present. In total, for such a hydraulic fracturing operation, each assembly 310, 600 may generate between about 2,000 and about 15,000 PSI or more. Thus, as valves 100, 350 strike seats 385, 380 within each assembly 310, 600, an extreme amount of stress is concentrated at each valve-seat interface 475, 575 (see
The above embodiments of valve-seat architecture may be employed to extend the life of valves and related equipment for positive displacement pump assemblies that are configured for pumping abrasive fluids. Thus, the need to disassemble pump equipment in order to monitor the condition of pump internals may be reduced. Indeed, extending the life of such abrasive fluid pumping equipment may include the delay or substantial prevention of the occurrence of valve leaks as opposed to simply acoustically monitoring leak occurrences.
The preceding description has been presented with reference to presently preferred embodiments. Persons skilled in the art and technology to which these embodiments pertain will appreciate that alterations and changes in the described structures and methods of operation may be practiced without meaningfully departing from the principle, and scope of these embodiments. For example, circumferential components are depicted herein as uniformly disposed about a valve insert. However, alternate embodiments of a concave surface, rounded abutment, core mechanism or other circumferential component may be employed that are of a discontinuous, asymmetrical, or other non-uniform configuration throughout the valve insert. Furthermore, the foregoing description should not be read as pertaining only to the precise structures described and shown in the accompanying drawings, but rather should be read as consistent with and as support for the following claims, which are to have their fullest and fairest scope.
This Patent Document claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/917,366, entitled Valve for a Positive Displacement Pump filed on May 11, 2007 and Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/985,874, entitled Valve for a Positive Displacement Pump filed on Nov. 6, 2007, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2107200 | Kennon | Feb 1938 | A |
2259940 | Nathan | Oct 1941 | A |
2260381 | Kennon | Oct 1941 | A |
2898082 | Von Almen et al. | Aug 1959 | A |
3039488 | Bowerman | Jun 1962 | A |
3202178 | Wolfe et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
3742976 | Bailey | Jul 1973 | A |
4076212 | Leman | Feb 1978 | A |
4180097 | Sjoberg | Dec 1979 | A |
4391328 | Aumann | Jul 1983 | A |
4784225 | Petersen | Nov 1988 | A |
4786209 | Nilsson et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4951707 | Johnson | Aug 1990 | A |
5048604 | Vadasz F. et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5062480 | Chacin U. et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5193577 | de Koning | Mar 1993 | A |
5249600 | Blume | Oct 1993 | A |
5297580 | Thurman | Mar 1994 | A |
7000632 | McIntire et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
20040170507 | Vicars | Sep 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0237112 | Sep 1987 | EP |
0030231 | May 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080279706 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60917366 | May 2007 | US | |
60985874 | Nov 2007 | US |