1. Field of the Invention
The invention pertains to the field of electrostatic precipitators. More particularly, the invention pertains to vane electrostatic precipitators.
2. Description of Related Art
U.S. Pat. No. 4,172,028 discloses an electrostatic sieve having parallel sieve electrodes that are either vertical or inclined. The particles are normally introduced into the electric sieve under the control of a feeder that is placed directly in front of the opposing screen electrode. The powder is attracted directly from the feeder tray to the opposing screen electrode by an induced electric field that exists between the tray and the screen electrode. This system is a static air system.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,725,289 uses flow dividers in an electrostatic precipitator to try to control flow. Discharge of collected dust particles is still taking place where the air flow is relatively high, making re-entrainment a strong possibility.
Prior art precipitators have difficulty collecting highly conductive and very poorly conductive particulates.
There is also a need to improve on present electrostatic precipitator technology used to continuously collect coarse and fine coal ash particles from coal fired boilers related to the fact that bag houses are now used in conjunction with electrostatic precipitators to better clean the air.
The embodiments described herein improve on the present electrostatic precipitator method of using parallel plates to collect particulates by using multiple parallel vanes set at the operating parameters described below. By using vanes, the main entrained air is subdivided and directed to flow between vanes that induce resistance to flow, allowing charged particles to collect on the vanes. The vane is designed to be wide enough so the air flow rate at the ends of the vanes is less than one foot per second (<1 ft/s), allowing particles discharged from the plates to fall by gravity and in the direction of very low air flow, resulting in extremely low re-entrainment and efficient particle collection. Using vanes also allows for higher operating air velocities resulting in a smaller equipment foot print.
In one embodiment, a method for removing particles from at least one main narrow air stream uses a vane electrostatic precipitator including opposing vane type collecting electrodes. A leading edge of each vane type collecting electrode is offset from an adjacent leading edge such that each vane type collecting electrode is either longer or shorter than a preceding vane type collecting electrode to improve control and efficiency of collection of the particles. The method includes dividing the main narrow air stream into at least two smaller individual air streams in the vane electrostatic precipitator. The smaller individual air streams refer to the air that flows between the vanes. The method also preferably includes a step of dimensioning an input orifice and/or an output orifice and the vane type collecting electrodes to match operational requirements of the main narrow air stream.
The vane electrostatic precipitator in some preferred embodiments may further include saw tooth discharge electrodes located on an angle matching an angle of the leading edges of the vane type collecting electrodes. The vane type collecting electrodes are preferably located at ground potential resulting in no electrical field being established between opposing vane type collecting electrode surfaces and an electrical field is established between the leading edge of the vane type collecting electrodes and the discharge electrodes.
The method may preferably also include a step of dividing the vane type collecting electrodes into a plurality of operating groups each including at least two vane electrodes.
The operating groups are preferably combined into a vane assembly to match operating requirements for the vane electrostatic precipitator.
In another embodiment, a vane electrostatic precipitator includes vane electrodes having a leading edge and located at ground potential and discharge electrodes located at an angle matching the main air flow direction and in proximity to a leading edge of the vane electrodes, such that an electrical field is established between the leading edge of the vanes and the discharge electrodes and no electrical field exists between opposing surfaces of the vanes. A method collects particulates using this vane electrostatic precipitator using an electrical field established between the leading edge of the vane electrodes and the saw tooth discharge electrodes. The method also preferably includes a step of dimensioning an input orifice and/or an output orifice and the vane type collecting electrodes to match operational requirements of an air stream.
In another embodiment, the main air stream is divided into a number of smaller individual streams in a vane electrostatic precipitator. The vane electrostatic precipitator includes opposing vane type collecting electrodes that are tapered as an assembly from front to back and towards the center of the main air flow of the collection chamber to improve control and efficiency of collection of the particles.
In another embodiment, a vane electrostatic precipitator includes vane electrodes having a leading edge and a plurality of discharge electrodes facing the leading edge of the vane electrodes. The vane electrodes are located at ground potential resulting in no electrical field being established between opposing vane surfaces. An electrical field is established between the leading edge of the vane electrodes and the discharge electrodes.
The terms “vane”, “vane electrode”, and “vane type collecting electrode” are used interchangeably herein.
Several new factors have been identified as having a major bearing on the collection efficiency of a vane electrostatic precipitator. These include the vane offset, the width of the orifices (with wider orifices, the air flow capacity increases and, in some applications, the length of the field is reduced), the vane assembly angle and the position of discharge electrodes in relation to the leading edges of the vane electrodes.
The number of vanes per field and the vane area per field are related to the selection of the type of vane (1) design and to the desired efficiency of a vane electrostatic precipitator.
Note that the collection chamber (11) includes the width (11′), length (11″), and height (not shown) dimensions. The vane width (60) in a vane group (63) (two or more vanes that are grouped together to operate with the same operating parameters) may be constant or may vary along the length of the field (58), as shown in
In developing the vane electrostatic precipitator, several new factors were discovered that have a major bearing on the collection efficiency of the vane electrostatic precipitator. These include the vane offset (54), the distance (59) the discharge electrodes (3) are from the leading edge (55) of the vane electrodes (1) and the vane assembly angle (62).
The vane offset (54) refers to how much longer the next vane (1) is in relation to the preceding one. This offset (54), in combination with the distance (51) between a vane pair (two vanes) (56) determines the percent of the main air flow (9) that is expected to flow between each vane pair (56). The greater the offset (54), the larger the percentage of air diverted from the main air stream (9). This results in a number of other changes, including that the air flow rate increases with less flow interference, resulting in the possibility that vanes with a larger surface area are required but at the same time a lower number of vanes are used per chamber, as shown in
The type of discharge electrodes (3) (for example saw tooth discharge electrodes as shown in all four figures), the number of discharge electrodes (3), the position of the discharge electrodes (3), either parallel to the main air flow (9) or parallel to the vane operating angle (50), and the number of vanes (1) required per discharge electrode (3) are based on factors related to the type of material being processed and the power restrictions. In preferred embodiments, the discharge electrodes (3) are parallel to the main air flow (9) (as shown in
If circular wire discharge electrodes (3) are used, the directional placement in relation to the vanes (1) is not an issue, just the location. For this particular application. the saw tooth discharge electrode (3) is the preferred choice because of its uniformity of discharge along its length and, depending on its size, can affect the air flow.
The selection of the vane operating angle (50) and the vane width (60) are dependent on a number of factors, but one of the major factors is related to the amount of drag or interference to the flow that is required to meet the desired collection vane exit flow rate of less than <1 ft/s. Sharper angles (50) and wider (60) vanes (1) increase the interference to flow.
The distance (51) between the vanes (1) can have two effects on the process. It can determine whether both sides of the vanes (1) collect particulates and the amount of turbulence or drag induced on the entrained air. Collecting on both sides of the vanes is a desirable feature because it also reduces the overall length of the vane electrostatic precipitator. For applications where the particle concentration per cubic centimeter is high, the distance (51) between the vanes may have to be increased.
The required vane surface area (53) per collection chamber (11) and the number of fields (58) are related to the actual cubic feet per minute (ACFM) of air flow and the desired efficiency of the vane electrostatic precipitator.
Other desirable operating features that will in some cases improve on the collection of particulates are the ability to change the vane assembly angle (62) and/or the vane operating angle (50) during operation.
Listed below are a number of design parameters and operating variables that need to be considered and can be addressed by using computer modeling or by pilot model operating data, where some of the variables could be varied during the process to obtain the most efficient collection. Parameters a) through g) are specific parameters that are varied in embodiments discussed herein to improve collection and efficiency of the vane electrostatic precipitator.
Accordingly, it is to be understood that the embodiments of the invention herein described are merely illustrative of the application of the principles of the invention. Reference herein to details of the illustrated embodiments is not intended to limit the scope of the claims, which themselves recite those features regarded as essential to the invention.
This is a continuation-in-part patent application of copending application Ser. No. 13/369,823, filed Feb. 9, 2012, entitled “VANE ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR”, which claims one or more inventions which were disclosed in Provisional Application No. 61/521,897, filed Aug. 10, 2011, entitled “VANE ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR (VEP)”. The benefit under 35 USC §119(e) of the United States provisional application is hereby claimed, and the aforementioned applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1956591 | Gies | May 1934 | A |
2357734 | Haber | Sep 1944 | A |
2700429 | Wintermute | Jan 1955 | A |
2712858 | Wintermute | Jul 1955 | A |
2969127 | Cook | Jan 1961 | A |
3271932 | Newell | Sep 1966 | A |
3338035 | Dinkelacker | Aug 1967 | A |
3355864 | Sobeck | Dec 1967 | A |
3478494 | Lustenader et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3678653 | Buschman | Jul 1972 | A |
3693328 | Paucha | Sep 1972 | A |
3733785 | Gallaer | May 1973 | A |
3757498 | Hurlbut, Sr. et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3807140 | Gurvits et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3958962 | Hayashi | May 1976 | A |
4007023 | Batza | Feb 1977 | A |
4093432 | Ahlrich | Jun 1978 | A |
4172028 | Dunn | Oct 1979 | A |
4178156 | Tashiro et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4181509 | Honacker et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4231766 | Spurgin | Nov 1980 | A |
4246010 | Honacker | Jan 1981 | A |
4264343 | Natarajan et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4265641 | Natarajan | May 1981 | A |
4412850 | Kurata et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4478614 | Jonelis | Oct 1984 | A |
4481017 | Furlong | Nov 1984 | A |
4666475 | Gustavsson | May 1987 | A |
4713092 | Kikuchi et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4725289 | Quintilian | Feb 1988 | A |
4832710 | Jury | May 1989 | A |
5156658 | Riehl | Oct 1992 | A |
5215558 | Moon | Jun 1993 | A |
5466279 | Hattori et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5547493 | Krigmont | Aug 1996 | A |
5601791 | Plaks et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5993521 | Loreth et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6004376 | Frank | Dec 1999 | A |
6152988 | Plaks et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6482253 | Dunn | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6524369 | Krigmont | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6773489 | Dunn | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6962620 | Chang et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7022166 | Gittler | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7105041 | Dunn | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7582144 | Krigmont | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7582145 | Krigmont | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7585352 | Dunn | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7901489 | Jin et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20010039877 | Hein | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20090071328 | Dunn | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100037766 | Boyden et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037767 | Boyden et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110139009 | Nakahara et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
545606 | Mar 1932 | DE |
0237512 | Sep 1987 | EP |
1131162 | Feb 2006 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Turner et al., “Sizing and Costing of Electrostatic precipitators, Part 1”, Journal of Waste Manage Association, vol. 38, pp. 458-471, 1988. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130118349 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61521897 | Aug 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13369823 | Feb 2012 | US |
Child | 13724286 | US |