Varactor Device with Reduced Temperature Dependence

Abstract

The invention discloses a varactor device (100) for improved temperature stability, comprising a first varactor (160) connected to a decoupling network (150). The device further comprises a voltage stabilizer (110), said stabilizer comprising a capacitor (140) and a temperature dependent capacitor (130), and in that the stabilizer comprises means for connection to a DC-feed (120). Suitably, the decoupling network (150) is connected in parallel to the first varactor (160), and the capacitor (140) of the voltage stabilizer (110) is connected in parallel to the decoupling network (150), the temperature dependent capacitor (130) of the voltage stabilizer (110) being connected in series to the diode of the voltage stabilizer (110).

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention discloses a varactor device for improved temperature stability, comprising a first varactor connected to a decoupling network.

BACKGROUND ART

Tuneable microwave components such as varactors, phase shifters, delay lines etc. which are based on lumped element or distributed ferroelectric varactors usually suffer from large temperature dependence of their parameters due to inherent temperature dependence of the ferroelectric materials.

Naturally, this temperature dependence is undesired, since it will, inter alia, cause problems in the use of such components in various designs.

DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION

Thus, there is a need for a less temperature dependent varactor or varactor device than has hitherto been available.

This need is addressed by the present invention in that it discloses a varactor device for improved temperature stability, comprising a first varactor connected to a decoupling network. The device further comprises a voltage stabilizer, said stabilizer comprising a capacitor and a temperature dependent capacitor. In addition, the stabilizer comprises means for connection to a DC-feed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention will be described in more detail in the following detailed description, with reference to the appended drawings, in which

FIG. 1 shows the temperature dependency of a ferroelectric varactor, and

FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a device according to the present invention, and

FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of a specific example of an embodiment of the invention, and

FIG. 4 shows the temperature dependent voltage drops over the capacitor C_T, and

FIG. 5 shows the temperature dependency of a varactor device of the invention

EMBODIMENTS

In order to first illustrate the problem which the device of the invention is intended to solve, reference is made to FIG. 1 which shows the capacitance of a typical varactor as a function of the ambient temperature. Different curves are shown, each one representing a different bias voltage used with the varactor. The top curve in the diagram shows the capacitance of the varactor at a bias voltage of 0 volts.

As is apparent from FIG. 1, the temperature dependence of the varactor's capacitance is quite high. The aim of the present invention is to stabilise the capacitance of a varactor with respect to ambient temperature.

FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a device 100 which illustrates the principles behind the invention. As shown in FIG. 2, the device according to the invention comprises a first varactor 160, which it is intended to give stable temperature characteristics by means of the device 100.

Apart from the first varactor 160 and its output ports 170, the device 100 additionally comprises a decoupling network 150. One of the reasons for the decoupling network 150 is to shield the rest of the device 100 from signals which are applied to the first varactor 160, especially since the first varactor 160 is mainly intended to be used at high frequencies, usually microwave frequencies.

Suitably, the decoupling network 150 is coupled in parallel to the varactor 160. FIG. 3 shows the device 100 of FIG. 2, but also shows an example of a decoupling network, in this case in the shape of a coil 155.

The decoupling network 150 could also, particularly for wide band operation, just be a resistor. Since no current will flow via the capacitors, no voltage drop will occur on such a resistor. For narrow band operation, the decoupling network 150 may be a parallel LC circuit with a resonant frequency corresponding to the frequency of operation of the first varactor 160.

The device 100 also comprises a voltage stabilizer 110, the function of which will become apparent in the following description. The voltage stabilizer 110 comprises input means 120 for a DC-voltage, a temperature dependent capacitor 130, and a capacitor 140.

As shown in FIG. 2, the capacitor 140 of the voltage stabilizer 110 is connected in parallel to the decoupling network 150, and the temperature dependent capacitor 130 of the voltage stabilizer 110 is connected in series to the capacitor 140.

In order to utilize the stabilising characteristics of the device 100, a DC-voltage V_DC is applied to the DC-input means 120 of the stabilizer. This voltage V_DC will be divided in a voltage V_C over the capacitor 140 and a voltage V_T over the temperature dependent capacitor 130. If the capacitance of the capacitor 140 is C and that of the temperature dependent capacitor 130 is C_T, the input DC-voltage V_DC will divide as follows:

$\begin{array}{cc}{V}_C=\frac{C_T}{C+C_T}V_{\mathrm{DC}}& \left(1\right)\\ V_T=\frac{C}{C+C_T}V_{\mathrm{DC}}& \left(2\right)\end{array}$

The temperature dependent capacitor 130 included in the voltage divider 110 is made of a similar, preferably the same, type of ferroelectric material as the first varactor 160, and thus preferably has a temperature dependent capacitance as that shown in FIG. 1, i.e. the same as the first varactor 160.

Consider now what will happen in the case of a capacitance increase in both the first varactor 160 and the temperature dependent capacitor 130 varactors caused by a change in ambient temperature:

Due to such a change in capacitances, a voltage redistribution takes place in the voltage divider 110, so that the voltage on the temperature dependent capacitor 130 decreases when its capacitance increases.

As follows from equations (1) and (2) above, the voltage V_C over the capacitor 140 is V_C=V_DC−V_T. For a lossless decoupling network such as the one shown in FIG. 2, the voltage V_V over the first varactor 160 is the same as the voltage V_c over the capacitor 140, i.e. V_v=V_C, and thus V_v=V_DC−V_T

A temperature dependent reduction in the capacitance of the first varactor 160 will cause a similar capacitance reduction in the voltage dependent capacitor 130. This capacitance reduction of the temperature dependent capacitor 130 will cause the stabilising voltage V_DC to be redistributed, with a smaller voltage now being applied over the temperature dependent capacitor 130. Since the temperature dependent capacitor 130 is coupled in parallel to the decoupling network 150 and also to the first varactor 160, this means that the voltage applied from the stabilizer 120 to the first varactor 160 will drop.

As a result of the drop in voltage V_C from the stabilizer 120 to the first varactor 160, the reduction of the first varactor's capacitance caused by temperature will be compensated by a reduced voltage V_C and thus a reduction in V_V, leading to an increase in the first varactor's capacitance.

In a similar way, any temperature-caused capacitance increase of the first varactor 160 will be compensated by increased voltage V_C leading to a corresponding change in the voltage V_v over the first varactor.

In order to achieve the desired effect, i.e. corresponding variations in capacitance in the first varactor 160 and the diode 130, the temperature dependent capacitor 130 is suitably made of a similar, preferably the same, type of ferroelectric material as the first varactor 160, and is thus characterised by temperature dependent characteristics similar to the one shown in FIG. 3.

FIG. 4 shows how the voltage on the diode 130 decreases when its capacitance increases, caused by, for example, changes in the ambient temperature.

FIG. 5 shows the temperature dependency of the first varactor 160 when it is used in a device 100 of the invention. As can be seen, the temperature dependency is greatly reduced by means of the invention.

The invention is not limited to the examples of embodiments shown above, but may be freely varied within the scope of the claims. For example, the temperature dependent capacitor 130 and the capacitor 140 may change places relative to that shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, if the temperature dependent capacitor 130 has an “opposite” temperature dependence, i.e. when the capacitance of the varactor 160 goes up, the capacitance of the temperature dependent capacitor 140 goes down.

Naturally, in the embodiments shown, it is a desire that the capacitor 140 is temperature independent.

Claims

1. A varactor device for improved temperature stability, comprising a first varactor connected to a decoupling network, characterized in that the device further comprises a voltage stabilizer, said stabilizer comprising a capacitor and a temperature dependent capacitor, and in that the stabilizer comprises means for connection to a DC-feed.

2. The varactor device of claim 1, wherein the decoupling network is connected in parallel to the first varactor, and the capacitor of the voltage stabilizer is connected in parallel to the decoupling network, the temperature dependent capacitor of the voltage stabilizer being connected in series to the diode of the voltage stabilizer.

3. The varactor device of claim 1, wherein the first varactor and the temperature dependent capacitor have essentially the same temperature dependency with regard to one or more of their electrical parameters.

4. The varactor device of claim 1, wherein the decoupling network comprises a coil.