Systems often require that certain electrical signals be delayed in time with respect to other signals in order to perform various signal processing or conditioning functions. Methods for providing an electrical time delay include, but are not limited to, transmission line delay lines, surface and bulk acoustic wave delay lines, and tapped digital delay circuits.
Systems and methods for a variable delay line using variable capacitors in a time delay filter are provided. In at least one embodiment, a delay line is configured to apply an adjustable time delay to an electromagnetic signal travelling through the delay line. The delay line comprises a filter that includes a first variable capacitor. Further, a capacitance of the first variable capacitor is configured to adjust the delay applied to the electromagnetic signal travelling through the delay line when varied.
Understanding that the drawings depict only exemplary embodiments and are not therefore to be considered limiting in scope, the exemplary embodiments will be described with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings, in which:
In accordance with common practice, the various described features are not drawn to scale but are drawn to emphasize specific features relevant to the exemplary embodiments.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific illustrative embodiments. However, it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical, mechanical, and electrical changes may be made. Furthermore, the method presented in the drawing figures and the specification is not to be construed as limiting the order in which the individual steps may be performed. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.
As stated above, methods for providing an electrical time delay include, but are not limited to, transmission line delay lines, surface and bulk acoustic wave delay lines, and tapped digital delay circuits. Electrical filters are also known to a provide time delay; however, the amount of delay available from a typical filter structure is small compared with the requirements of many systems. One limitation of these methods is that they only provide a fixed value of delay that is typically chosen during design of the system. If a unique delay value is required for each instance of the system, the value must be determined and chosen at the time of manufacture. This becomes costly and difficult to manage. A second limitation of many implementations of delay lines, especially filter implementations, is that the amount of delay varies versus frequency. This makes them suitable for use as delay lines only over a very limited frequency bandwidth.
As stated above, there are disadvantages to the conventional implementations for delaying an electrical signal, such as only providing a fixed delay and in the case of filters, providing different delays for different signal frequencies. The embodiments described herein solve these limitations by utilizing a filter structure that includes tuning capabilities for adjusting both the absolute delay and also compensating for the delay variation as a function of frequency. In some embodiments the filter includes a first variable capacitor so that the delay can be tuned by adjusting the capacitance of the first variable capacitor. In exemplary embodiments, the first variable capacitor is a variable shunt capacitor. In some other embodiments, the first variable capacitor is a variable series capacitor. Moreover, in some embodiments, a second variable capacitor is included in the filter in order to adjust the peak-to-peak delay variation for signals with different frequencies in the passband of the filter. In exemplary embodiments, the second variable capacitor is a variable series capacitor. The delay line embodiments as described herein can be used in many different applications including, but not limited to, radar systems using frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) techniques, such as monostatic radar altimeters, some forms of radars using pulse compression techniques, communication systems using spread spectrum techniques, amplifier circuits, transceivers and receivers used in communication systems, quadrature modulation circuits and other types of electronic systems.
The at least one input transmission line media 104 and the at least one output transmission line media 108 in delay line 100A can be implemented in any of the following: microstrip, coaxial cable, stripline, coplanar waveguide, and the like; however, this list is exemplary and not meant to be limiting. The at least one input transmission line media 104 and the at least one output transmission line media 108 can be used to transfer electromagnetic energy between the at least one delay line input 102, the at least one delay line output 110 and any of the components included in delay line 100A.
The filter 106A inserted into the delay line 100A can be any type of filter, including a bandpass filter, an all-pass filter, a low-pass filter or a high-pass filter. In some embodiments, the filter 106A inserted into the delay line 100A comprises at least one first variable capacitor 112, 114. In some embodiments, the filter 106A can also include at least one first inductor 116, 118. In exemplary embodiments, the filter can be a bandpass filter 106A and comprise at least one first variable shunt capacitor 112, at least one second variable series capacitor 114, at least one first shunt inductor 116 and at least one second series inductor 118 inserted into the at least one delay line 100A. The function of each of these components is discussed below. In exemplary embodiments, the bandpass filter 106A is a second-order bandpass filter comprising only a single first variable shunt capacitor 112, a single shunt inductor 116, a single second variable series capacitor 114, and a single series inductor 118, as shown in
The filter 106A inserted into the delay line 100A has a few different purposes in exemplary embodiments. First, in embodiments where the filter 106A is a bandpass filter, the filter 106A can allow a signal whose frequency is between the two cut-off frequencies to be passed by the delay line 100A, while signals with frequencies outside of the two cut-off frequencies are not allowed to pass through the delay line 100A. The frequency range between the two cut-off frequencies is called the passband. The cut-off frequencies can be varied depending on the choice of inductances 116, 118 and capacitances 112, 114 in the bandpass filter 106A. In some embodiments where the delay line 100A is used in radar altimeter applications, the passband of the bandpass filter 106A allows frequencies from 4.2-4.4 gigahertz to pass through delay line 100A after the apparatus 100A is tuned according to the examples described below.
Second, the filter 106A can delay an electromagnetic signal that passes through the delay line 100A. The filter 106A does this by including at least one first variable capacitor 112, 114, wherein the capacitance of the at least one first variable capacitor 112, 114 is varied to adjust the delay for a signal travelling through the delay line 100A. More specifically, the capacitance of the at least one first variable capacitor 112, 114 is adjusted to achieve the desired delay of the signal travelling in the delay line 100A. In exemplary embodiments, the at least one first variable capacitor 112, 114 is a variable shunt capacitor 112. In other embodiments, the at least one first variable capacitor 112, 114 is a variable series capacitor 114.
In exemplary embodiments, the at least one first variable capacitor 112, 114 used to adjust the delay for a signal travelling through the delay line 100A can be an electronically variable capacitor 112, 114. If the at least one first variable capacitor 112, 114 is an electronically variable capacitor 112, 114, then the electronically variable capacitor 112, 114 can be in the form of a varicap diode, a varactor diode, a variable capacitance diode, a variable reactance diode, a tuning diode, a digitally tuned capacitor, etc. In embodiments where the at least one first variable capacitor 112, 114 is a varactor diode, the capacitance of the varactor diode is varied in accordance with the magnitude of a reverse-bias voltage injected through resistors 128, 130 applied across the terminals of the varactor diode, wherein the reverse-bias voltage injected through resistors 128, 130 can be controlled by a programmable processor 132. Programmable processor 132 can be a microcontroller, a microprocessor (e.g., a digital signal processor (DSP)), a field programmable switch array (FPGA), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a central processing unit (CPU) coupled to a memory device or other programmable device. In addition, in some embodiments, a digital-to-analog converter can be included with the programmable processor 132 to change the digital output into an analog output for use in controlling the reverse-bias voltage injected through resistors 128, 130. When the capacitance in the electronically variable capacitor 112, 114 is changed due to a change in the reverse-bias voltage injected through resistors 128, 130, the time delay of a signal travelling along the delay line 100A changes. This is different than in conventional implementations where a capacitor 112, 114 and an inductor 116, 118 are used to tune a filter for a specific frequency band in order to maximize the return loss and minimize the insertion loss. In some embodiments, the at least one first variable capacitor 112, 114 can be a mechanically variable capacitor 112, 114.
When the capacitance of the at least one first variable capacitor 112, 114 is adjusted to increase (or decrease) the delay for a signal travelling through the delay line 100A, the slope of the delay as a function of frequency changes. Stated another way, there is more peak-to-peak delay variation for signals with different frequencies in the passband of the filter 106A when the delay in the delay line 100A is increased (or decreased). To counter this effect, the filter 106A can have a third purpose, namely, to decrease (or increase) the peak-to-peak delay variation for signals with different frequencies in the passband of the filter 106A. To accomplish this, in exemplary embodiments, the filter 106A includes at least one second variable capacitor 112, 114, such that the capacitance of the at least one second variable capacitor is configured to adjust the peak-to-peak delay variation for signals with different frequencies in a passband of the filter 106A when varied. In some embodiments, the filter 106A can also include at least one second inductor 116, 118. In exemplary embodiments, the at least one first variable capacitor 112, 114 used to increase (or decrease) the delay for a signal travelling through the delay line 100A is a variable shunt capacitor 112; and, the at least one second variable capacitor 112, 114 used to adjust the peak-to-peak delay variation for signals with different frequencies is a variable series capacitor 114. In exemplary embodiments, the capacitance of the at least one second variable series capacitor 114 can be adjusted to decrease the peak-to-peak delay variation to less than two picoseconds.
Similar to above, the at least one second variable capacitor 112, 114 used to adjust the peak-to-peak variation for signals with different frequencies can be an electronically variable capacitor 112, 114; and in other embodiments, the at least one second variable capacitor 112, 114 can be a mechanically variable capacitor 112, 114. When the at least one second variable capacitor 112, 114 is an electronically variable capacitor 112, 114, then the electronically variable capacitor 112, 114 can be in the form of a varicap diode, a varactor diode, a variable capacitance diode, a variable reactance diode, a tuning diode, a digitally tuned capacitor, etc. In embodiments where the at least one second variable capacitor 112, 114 is a varactor diode, the capacitance of the varactor diode is varied in accordance with the magnitude of a reverse-bias voltage injected through resistors 128, 130 applied across the terminals of the varactor diode. In exemplary embodiments, the reverse-bias voltage injected through resistors 128, 130 can be controlled by a programmable processor 132, such as a microcontroller, a microprocessor (e.g., a digital signal processor (DSP)), a field programmable switch array (FPGA), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a central processing unit (CPU) coupled to a memory device or other programmable device. Similar to above, in some embodiments, a digital-to-analog converter can be included with the programmable processor 132 to change the digital output into an analog output for use in controlling the reverse-bias voltage injected through resistors 128, 130.
In some embodiments, such as when the filter 106A is a bandpass filter, tuning the variable shunt capacitor 112 and tuning the variable series capacitor 114 can be an iterative process, i.e., retuning a capacitance that has already been tuned in order to achieve the desired delay and the desired peak-to-peak variation. For example, if the variable series capacitor 114 is used to adjust the peak-to-peak delay variation for signals with different frequencies, then after the variable series capacitor 114 is tuned to adjust the peak-to-peak delay variation for signals with different frequencies, the variable shunt capacitor 112 is retuned to achieve the desired delay. In some embodiments, this can be helpful since tuning the variable series capacitor 114 to adjust the peak-to-peak delay variation for signals with different frequencies may change the delay in the delay line 100A. After the variable shunt capacitor 112 is retuned, it may be necessary to retune the variable series capacitor 114 to achieve the desired peak-to-peak delay variation. This process can be repeated as many times as necessary to achieve the desired delay in the delay line 100A and peak-to-peak variation across the passband of the filter 106A. In some other embodiments, tuning the variable shunt capacitor 112 and tuning the variable series capacitor 114 can be set by applying the desired bias voltages without iteration, i.e., not retuning a capacitance, to achieve the desired delay and delay variation.
As stated above, in some embodiments, delay line 100A can include optional attenuators 120, 122. In at least one embodiment, optional attenuator 120 can be inserted into delay line 100A between the at least one input transmission line media 104 and the input to the filter 106A. Further, in at least one embodiment, optional attenuator 122 can be inserted into delay line 100A between the at least one output transmission line media 108 and the output of the filter 106A. Optional attenuator 120 and optional attenuator 122 can reduce the input power and improve overall delay line 100A return loss to allow for return loss degradation of the filter due to changing capacitances.
In some embodiments, delay line 100A can include optional DC blocking capacitors 124, 126. Optional DC blocking capacitors 124, 126 can be useful if electronically variable capacitors are used as the variable shunt capacitor 112 and the variable series capacitor 114 as explained below. In some embodiments, the optional DC blocking capacitor 124 can be inserted between the at least one input transmission line media 104 and the input of the filter 106A. Additionally, the optional DC blocking capacitor 126 can be inserted between the output of the filter 106A and the at least one output transmission line media 108. In embodiments where optional attenuators 120, 122 are included in delay line 100A, the optional DC blocking capacitors 124 and 126 can be inserted between the filter 106A and optional attenuators 120, 122, respectively. When optional DC blocking capacitors 124, 126 are inserted into delay line 100A, each optional DC blocking capacitor 124, 126 can help block DC signals, such as the one used to bias the electronically variable capacitors 124, 126, from going beyond the filter 106A and into the at least one delay line input 102 and/or the at least one delay line output 110.
In some embodiments, method 200 further comprises optionally varying the capacitance of at least one second variable capacitor in the filter of the delay line to adjust the peak-to-peak delay variation for signals with different frequencies in a passband of the filter. In some embodiments, the filter can also include at least one second inductor. The at least one second inductor can have some or all of the same properties as the at least one second inductor 116, 118 discussed above.
Similar to above, when the capacitance of the at least one first variable capacitor is adjusted in block 202 to increase (or decrease) the delay for a signal travelling through the at least one delay line, the peak-to-peak delay variation for signals with different frequencies in the passband of the filter is increased (or decreased). The at least one second variable capacitor can have some or all of the same characteristics as the at least one second variable capacitor 112, 114 discussed above; and therefore, the capacitance of the at least one second variable capacitor in method 200 can be varied in the same way as above in
The at least one delay line can have some or all of the same characteristics as the delay line 100A discussed above in
Example 1 includes a delay line configured to apply an adjustable time delay to an electromagnetic signal travelling through the delay line, the delay line comprising: a filter including: a first variable capacitor, wherein a capacitance of the first variable capacitor is configured to adjust the delay applied to the electromagnetic signal travelling through the delay line when varied.
Example 2 includes the delay line of Example 1, wherein the first variable capacitor is a variable shunt capacitor.
Example 3 includes the delay line of any of Examples 1-2, wherein the filter further comprises a second variable capacitor, wherein a capacitance of the second variable capacitor is configured to adjust the peak-to-peak delay variation for signals with different frequencies in a passband of the filter when varied.
Example 4 includes the delay line of Example 3, wherein the first variable capacitor is a variable shunt capacitor and the second variable capacitor is a variable series capacitor.
Example 5 includes the delay line of any of Examples 3-4, wherein the first variable capacitor is an electronically variable capacitor; and wherein the second variable capacitor is an electronically variable capacitor.
Example 6 includes the delay line of Example 5, wherein the first variable capacitor and the second variable capacitor are at least one of a varicap diode, a varactor diode, a variable capacitance diode, a variable reactance diode, a tuning diode, or a digitally tuned capacitor.
Example 7 includes the delay line of any of Examples 1-6, wherein the delay line includes a physical length configured to result in additional delay applied to the electromagnetic signal travelling through the delay line.
Example 8 includes the delay line of any of Examples 1-7, wherein the delay line is integrated into a radar altimeter system; and wherein the electromagnetic signal traveling through the delay line is a radar altimeter signal.
Example 9 includes a method comprising: varying a capacitance of a first variable capacitor in a filter of a delay line to adjust the delay for an electromagnetic signal passing through the delay line.
Example 10 includes the method of Example 9, wherein the first variable capacitor is a variable shunt capacitor.
Example 11 includes the method of any of Examples 9-10, further comprising varying a capacitance of a second variable capacitor in the filter of the delay line to adjust the peak-to-peak delay variation for signals with different frequencies in a passband of the filter.
Example 12 includes the method of Example 11, wherein the first variable capacitor is a variable shunt capacitor and the second variable capacitor is a variable series capacitor.
Example 13 includes the method of any of Examples 11-12, wherein varying the capacitance of the first variable capacitor is done electronically and wherein varying the capacitance of the second variable capacitor is done electronically; and wherein the first variable capacitor and the second variable capacitor are at least one of a varicap diode, a varactor diode, a variable capacitance diode, a variable reactance diode, a tuning diode, or a digitally tuned capacitor.
Example 14 includes the method of any of Examples 11-13, wherein varying the capacitance of the first variable capacitor includes repeatedly varying the capacitance of the first variable capacitor and varying the capacitance of the second variable capacitor includes repeatedly varying the capacitance of the second variable capacitor until the desired delay for the electromagnetic signal passing through the delay line and the desired peak-to-peak delay variation for signals with different frequencies in the passband of the filter is achieved.
Example 15 includes the method of any of Examples 11-13, wherein varying the capacitance of the first variable capacitor and varying the capacitance of the second variable capacitor comprises setting the capacitance of the first variable capacitor and setting the capacitance of the second variable capacitor without iteration.
Example 16 includes the method of any of Examples 9-15, wherein the delay line includes a physical length configured to result in additional delay applied to the electromagnetic signal travelling through the delay line.
Example 17 includes the method of any of Examples 9-16, wherein the delay line is integrated into a radar altimeter system; and wherein the electromagnetic signal traveling through the delay line is a radar altimeter signal.
Example 18 includes a delay line configured to apply an electronically variable group delay to an electromagnetic signal travelling through the delay line, the delay line comprising: wherein the delay line includes a physical length configured to result in an intrinsic delay applied to the electromagnetic signal travelling through the delay line; a filter configured to vary the electronically variable group delay applied to the electromagnetic signal traveling through the delay line in response to an electronic signal; and wherein the filter is further configured to adjust the peak-to-peak delay variation for signals with different frequencies in a passband of the filter in response to a second electronic signal.
Example 19 includes the delay line of Example 18, wherein the filter is a bandpass filter.
Example 20 includes the delay line of any of Examples 18-19, wherein the delay line is integrated into a radar altimeter system; and wherein the electromagnetic signal traveling through the delay line is a radar altimeter signal.
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement, which is calculated to achieve the same purpose, may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. Therefore, it is manifestly intended that this invention be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3021521 | Hutchins | Feb 1962 | A |
3611377 | Rittenbach | Oct 1971 | A |
3699480 | Mueller | Oct 1972 | A |
3774206 | Rauch | Nov 1973 | A |
4577163 | Culp | Mar 1986 | A |
4604591 | Vasile | Aug 1986 | A |
4695013 | Trampnau | Sep 1987 | A |
4701714 | Agoston | Oct 1987 | A |
4725842 | Mayberry | Feb 1988 | A |
4728953 | Richmond | Mar 1988 | A |
4825214 | Dejaegher | Apr 1989 | A |
4945360 | Trummer et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4965533 | Gilmore | Oct 1990 | A |
4967201 | Rich, III | Oct 1990 | A |
4968967 | Stove | Nov 1990 | A |
5353038 | Osborne et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5548243 | Sun et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5719581 | Poe | Feb 1998 | A |
5757239 | Gilmore | May 1998 | A |
5757311 | Voyce | May 1998 | A |
6043758 | Snyder, Jr. et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6087980 | Saryo | Jul 2000 | A |
6154640 | Itoh et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6295020 | Koechlin | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6373427 | Hohne | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384770 | de Gouy et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6407697 | Hager et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6426717 | Maloratsky | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6486826 | Cramer et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6556096 | Ouacha | Apr 2003 | B1 |
7161527 | Vacanti | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7239266 | Vacanti | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7295151 | Vacanti | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7463710 | Walsh et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7791415 | Hornbuckle | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7825851 | Vacanti | Nov 2010 | B2 |
RE42316 | Vacanti | May 2011 | E |
8085097 | Cloutier et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8259002 | Vacanti et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8324515 | Stevenson et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8638139 | Keaveney et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8917204 | Trotta et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20020066829 | DeWitt et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020112218 | Nakamura et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020135970 | Klee et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030201930 | Nagasaku et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040130482 | Lin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040135703 | Arnold et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050225330 | Ochiai et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060049977 | Vacanti | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060262475 | Katsumata et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080246649 | Backes et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100225524 | Szajnowski | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100283665 | Bashir et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110122017 | Vacanti | May 2011 | A1 |
20110205105 | Reuter | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120112806 | Dayi | May 2012 | A1 |
20120242383 | Elad et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120256781 | Vacanti et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130033402 | Meyer | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130214963 | Vacanti | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130214964 | Holt | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140028491 | Ferguson | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140070985 | Vacanti | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150378017 | Ferguson et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19855367 | Jun 2000 | DE |
19915247 | Oct 2000 | DE |
0138253 | Apr 1985 | EP |
1227536 | Jul 2002 | EP |
2690455 | Jan 2014 | EP |
2007930 | May 1979 | GB |
60008197 | Jan 1985 | JP |
6120735 | Apr 1994 | JP |
8097744 | Apr 1996 | JP |
H08125701 | May 1996 | JP |
11148972 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2000151328 | May 2000 | JP |
2002353709 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003018001 | Jan 2003 | JP |
200527246 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005151444 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2013200135 | Oct 2013 | JP |
580579 | Mar 2004 | TW |
9935740 | Jul 1999 | WO |
2011064157 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office, “Extended EP Search Report from EP Application No. 15168777.9 mailed Nov. 17, 2015”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 14/303,180”, Nov. 17, 2015, pp. 1-8, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report from EP Application No. 15170178.6 mailed Nov. 5, 2015”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 14/316,176”, Nov. 5, 2015, pp. 1-8, Published in: EP. |
Thompson, “Intuitive Analog Circuit Design”, Dec. 6, 2013, pp. 571-572, Publisher: Newnes, Elsevier, Published in: US. |
Belfiori, “Antenna Array Signal Processing for Multistatic Radar Systems”, Jun. 12, 2013, pp. i-146, Published in: IT. |
Gupta, “Optimization and Realization of tunable Band pass Filters”, “retrieved on Feb. 20, 2014 from Internet http://www.linkedin.com/pub/navam-gupta/4a/862/248”, May 2011-Jul. 2011, pp. 1-3. |
Pavlenko, “Tunable lumped-element bandpass filters for Cognitive Radio application”, “Master's Degree Programme in Technomathematics and Technical Physics”, May 2013, pp. i-49. |
Japan Patent Office, “Notification of Reasons for Rejection from JP Application No. 2007-530115 mailed Apr. 25, 2011”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/926,676”, Apr. 25, 2011, pp. 1-8, Published in: JP. |
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reason for Rejection from JP Application No. 2007-530115 mailed Jul. 9, 2012”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/926,676”, Jul. 9, 2012, pp. 1-6, Published in: JP. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Office Action from JP Application No. 2012-244383 mailed Aug. 2, 2013”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/926,676”, Aug. 2, 2013, pp. 1-9, Published in: JP. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/926,676”, Mar. 14, 2007, pp. 1-6, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/926,676”, Apr. 17, 2006, pp. 1-10, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/926,676”, Sep. 8, 2006, pp. 1-9, Published in: US. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report from EP Application No. 13155116.0 mailed Jun. 7, 2013”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,755”, Jun. 7, 2013, pp. 1-3, Published in: EP. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, Jun. 27, 2014, pp. 1-31, U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,755, Published in: US. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action from EP Application No. 13154997.4 mailed Jun. 19, 2013”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 13/760,347”, Jun. 19, 2013, pp. 1-6, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report from EP Application No. 13154997.4 mailed Jun. 6, 2013”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 13/760,347”, Jun. 6, 2013, pp. 1-3, Published in: EP. |
Appel, “Fractional N Synthesizers”, “RF Signal Processing”, Nov. 2000, pp. 1-9. |
Benard, “A High-Stability Low-Offset Phase-Locked-Loop Frequency Synthesizer”, “IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement”, Sep. 1975, pp. 222-224, vol. IM-24, No. 3. |
“KRA 10A Radar Altimeter”, May 2000, pp. 1-4, Publisher: Allied Signal Aerospace. |
Bisanti et al., “Fully integrated Sigma-Delta Synthesizer Suitable for ‘Indirect VCO modulation’ in 2.5G application”, “2003 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium”, at least as early as Dec. 2003, pp. 515-518. |
“TRA-3000 and TRA-3500 Radar Altimeters”, Feb. 2009, pp. 1-2, Publisher: Free Flight Systems. |
Caglio et al., “An Integrated GaAs 1.25 GHz Clock Frequency FM-CW Direct Digital Synthesizer”, Oct. 1993, pp. 167-170. |
“Honeywell HG8500 Series Radar Altimeter”, Jul. 2003, pp. 1-2, Publisher: Honeywell International Inc. |
Jeong et al., “A Multi-Beam and Multi-Range Radar with FMCW and Digital Beam Forming for Automotive Applications”, “Progress in Electromagnetics Research”, Nov. 2011, pp. 285-299, vol. 124. |
Nash, “Phase-Locked Loop Design Fundamentals”, Feb. 2006, pp. 1-22, Publisher: Freescale Semiconductor. |
Pazarci, “Phase-Lock Systems (ELE608E-01)”, Jan. 27, 2009, pp. 1-2. |
Reynolds et al., “Single chip FMCW radar for target velocity and range sensing applications”, “Gallium Arsenide Integrated Circuit (GaAs IC) Symposium, 1989. Technical Digest 1989., 11th Annual”, Oct. 1989, pp. 243-246. |
“Miniature Radar Altimeter: MRA Type 1”, May 2012, pp. 1-2, Publisher: Roke Manor Research Limited. |
“Miniature Radar Altimeter: MRA Type 2”, May 2012, pp. 1-2, Publisher: Roke Manor Research Limited. |
Saul, “Direct Frequency Synthesis: A Review of the Technique and Potential”, Jul. 1990, pp. 5-9, Publisher: Plessey Research Caswell, U.K. |
“Micro Radar Altimeter: UMRR-0A”, Dec. 2011, pp. 1-2, Publisher: S.M.S. Smart Microwave Sensors GmbH. |
“Radar Altimeter System Comparison”, Dec. 2011, pp. 1 Publisher: Southeast Aerospace. |
“Fractional/Integer-N PLL Basics”, Aug. 1999, pp. 1-55, Publisher: Texas Instruments. |
Ferguson et al., “Systems and Methods for Calibration and Optimization of Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave Radar Altimeters Using Adjustable Self-Interference Cancellation”, “U.S. Appl. No. 14/316,176, filed Jun. 26, 2014”, Jun. 26, 2014, pp. 1-23, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 14/316,176”, Aug. 19, 2016, pp. 1-76, Published in: US. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150365064 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |