The field of the invention relates to wind turbines. More specifically, the invention relates to the use of a variable diameter rotor for wind turbines.
Wind power is one of the cleanest and most environmentally friendly methods of producing electrical energy currently available. Wind power can produce major amounts of electrical energy without the production of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Additionally, wind power is renewable, as opposed to traditional fossil fuel sources of energy.
Modern wind turbines are placed on towers to take advantage of strong winds found higher up in the atmosphere, above the clutter of buildings and trees. Traditionally, rotors are attached by a hub to a low speed shaft leading into a nacelle. Inside the nacelle, a gearbox takes the high torque and low speed of the low speed shaft and converts it to the low torque and high speed of the high-speed shaft. The high-speed shaft drives a generator to produce electrical energy.
The amount of electrical energy generated is based in part on the size of the rotors used by the wind turbine and its relationship to the size of electrical generator. A general rule is that wind energy is proportional to the square of the diameter of the rotor. A second factor that contributes to the amount of electrical energy is the speed of the winds acting upon the rotor. If a large rotor relative to the size of the generator is suddenly acted upon by high winds, it can produce more electricity than the generator can absorb and additionally over stress the structure. Conversely, in a time of low winds, if the rotor is not large enough for the generator, the wind turbine efficiency may be low and the structure will see only a small proportion of its load carrying potential. What is needed is a wind turbine that can adjust to handle varying wind speed conditions in an efficient manner, while attempting to maximize energy capture for a given support structure.
A system and method for adjusting the diameter of a rotor in a wind turbine is described. In one embodiment, a wind turbine rotor is described that comprises a center hub, a first set of aerofoil rotor blades arranged around the center hub, and a first set of aerofoil rotor blade extensions nested inside the first set of aerofoil rotor blades. The first set of extensions are capable of extending an amount less than or equal to the length of the first set of blades by protracting from the first set of blades.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which
a–2c illustrates one embodiment of a wind turbine with adjustable rotor blades that can extend to operate at various diameters.
a–3r illustrates different methods of varying the length a rotor blade and consequently the diameter of the rotor blades.
a illustrates one embodiment of a winch pulley extension system.
b illustrates one embodiment of an extender slide system.
a–6b illustrates different grounding mechanisms for blade extensions.
a–7e illustrate exemplary power curves.
A variable diameter rotor for a wind turbine generator is disclosed. In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that these specific details need not be used to practice the present invention. Well-known structures, materials, circuits, processes and interfaces have not been shown or described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
The variable diameter rotor includes base blades and one or more blade extensions associated with the base blades. The blade extensions move between positions that range from fully extended to fully retracted. In embodiments where blades have more than one blade extension, the blade extensions for a blade may be independent from each other in that various blade extensions for a blade may be more extended or retracted than the other blade extensions for that blade.
In one embodiment, the extension and retraction of rotor blades to increase or decrease rotor diameter, respectively, is based on wind conditions and blade pitch angle. For example, in low winds, the rotor may be fully extended. As the winds increase in speed, the blades may start to pitch and a portion of the rotor blades may be retracted. In high winds, the rotor blades may be fully retracted. Thus, the diameter of the rotor may be increased to increase energy capture in frequently occurring moderate wind speeds (e.g., below rated wind speed) where most of the energy is available. At the same time, the rotor diameter may be reduced in high winds that would cause loads that would otherwise penalize a rotor of relatively large diameter.
In one embodiment, rotor blades 100 include aerofoils that nest telescopically within blade sections of greater dimension also using aerofoils, thereby preserving greater rotor efficiency. That is, the rotor blades comprise sections that have the ability to nest a narrow, constant chord or tapered aerofoil section inside a wide airfoil section.
Hub 105 is attached to a nacelle 110 by the shaft 115. The rotation of shaft 115 is coupled to a gearbox 120.
An electrical control system 135 monitors the conditions of the wind turbine, making appropriate adjustments as necessary. The electronic control system 135 controls a yaw mechanism 140, which controls the direction of the turbine upon tower 145. In addition to yaw control, the electronic control system 135 also controls the pitch mechanism 150, which control the pitch angle of the rotor blades 100, the rotational speed of the shaft 115 and the extension of the rotor blades 100.
In one embodiment, the diameter of the rotor is adjusted by extending or retracting the blade extensions. In one embodiment, the extension or retraction of blade extensions is performed based on wind speed. The change of rotor diameter compensates for differences in wind speed and turbulence, with a goal being to convert as much wind energy to electrical energy as possible in an efficient manner, while keeping loads within prescribed levels.
a–c illustrate the variable diameter rotor in three positions: fully extended, fully retracted, and a position between fully extended and fully retracted.
In one embodiment, the variable diameter rotor may operate with a larger diameter and higher rating than a baseline fixed diameter turbine and the load is regulated using the pitch system. In one embodiment, a torque factor greater than a conventional baseline turbine (e.g., 1.5 times baseline torque) is used whenever the rotor diameter is at its maximum and a minimum pitch angle (e.g., 1°) is used for maximum energy capture. Whenever the blade extensions are not fully extended or whenever a command to retract is received, the minimum pitch angle is immediately set to another predetermined value (e.g., 8°) greater than that used when the rotor diameter is at its maximum. This helps to reduce, and potentially minimize, loads on the system.
There are a number of different techniques for adjusting the rotor diameter. A number of such techniques are shown in
c shows an embodiment in which a second blade extension 320 is added to blade extension 310, with all blade extensions being fully extended.
e shows an embodiment in which the blade is split into a base blade 300, a first blade extension 310 and a secondary blade extension 330.
g shows an alternate embodiment in which blade extension 315, rather than the base blade 300, is the wider of the two blades.
k shows base blade 300 attached to the center hub 105 being narrower than blade extension 315. A second blade extension 340 is attached to the opposite end of blade extension 315 from base blade 300.
m shows an alternate method of deployment for blade extension 310 from the base blade 300. A hinge 350 connects the extension 310 to base blade 300 at the end opposite of hub 105. Blade extension 310 jackknifes open in any one of a number of directions.
o shows an embodiment in which blade extension 360 is inflatable or otherwise elastic.
Note that
One embodiment of the slider track used to guide a blade extension between extended and fully retracted positions is illustrated in
In one additional embodiment, friction guide blocks may be used on the blade extensions 310 or friction pads at the ends of the base blades 300 to prevent slippage of blade extension 310. A set of replaceable seal strips (not shown) between the base blade 300 and blade extension 310 prevent wind, snow, and other debris from obstructing the rotor blade retracting or extending.
There are a number of options for a bearing track material and some exemplary materials are as follows:
a) glass/epoxy structural laminate within a directional surface laminate and no gel coat;
b) phenolic laminate (e.g., Tufnol) facings, which is non-corroding and will act as a failsafe bearing should the PTFE pad become excessively worn; and
c) stainless steel facings, which works well with PTFE, is durable and relatively inexpensive.
Additional bearings within the tip of the base blade may be used to limit any undesirable motion of the extending portion of the blade relative to the base blade. Note that the base blade structure may have to be reinforced to handle the load associated with the sliding blade extension and the slider track.
In one embodiment, a cable winch, as shown in
In another embodiment, a cable system may be used in conjunction with one or more pulleys to cause the blade extension to extend as a cable is pulled towards the rotor hub. Furthermore, additional methods of extending and retracting the extension include, for example, but not limited to, a recirculating ball worm screw, a jacking screw, a pneumatic retraction and extension system, and a hydraulic retraction and extension system.
b illustrates one embodiment of an extender slide system showing the root end of a blade extension. This may operate in conjunction with the cable winch system of
In one embodiment, the blade extensions can be grounded to protect against strikes by lightning, as shown in
b shows an alternate embodiment of the grounding device for the extension. The blade extension 310 uses a conductive mesh 600 or tip stud and bonding conductor. Instead of the spark gaps, a sliding contact 650 is attached to the root base of the blade extension. The sliding contact 650 is in constant contact with either a conductive bus bar, a conductive bearing track 660, or some other device to allow connectivity with the hub.
Exemplary Power Curves
a–7e show exemplary power curves.
c is a power curve for a variable diameter rotor in which torque is not allowed to rise above baseline, a worthwhile restriction for a small energy loss. Referring to
In one embodiment, the variable diameter rotor is capable however of further diameter contraction and, at constant tip speed, some further increase in rotor speed. This allows more power to be generated, as shown in
As to a relation between torque rating of the drive train and diameters for optimum economics, the key lies in the ability to regulate systems loads almost independent of torque up-rating. Results suggest that about a 30% up-rating in drive train torque (1.3 torque factor) is advantageous (at higher torque factors, the energy increases are diminished by the load regulation strategies). This leads to a power curve shown in
Load Management
In contrast to conventional wind turbines, the variable diameter rotor may be operated with a relatively larger rotor diameter and higher power. Load regulation may be controlled using appropriate control of pitch system set points and diameter/speed variation. As torque factor increases, the rotor thrust increases. Even for small increases in torque factor, from 1 through 1.3 to 1.5 (at a 1° minimum pitch setting), the increase in rotor thrust may be substantial. To avoid an increase in rotor thrust when increases in torque factor are made, the minimum pitch angle may be increased. For example, the minimum pitch angle may be increased from a more normal 1° to 6° and 8° for torque factors of 1.3 and 1.5.
There is of course some energy penalty associated with increasing the minimum pitch angle. The energy yield increases almost linearly with torque factor in the absence of any load regulation. However, when the pitch setting is adjusted to regulate rotor thrust, the power curves converge at the higher torque factors. Up to a factor of approximately 1.3, there are substantial energy gains with each increment of torque factor, but thereafter little difference.
Although the present invention is described herein with reference to a specific preferred embodiment, many modifications and variations therein will readily occur to those with ordinary skill in the art. Accordingly, all such variations and modifications are included within the intended scope of the present invention as defined by the following claims.
This Invention was made with Government support under NREL Subcontract No. ZAM-7-13320-26, Prime Contract DE-AC36-83CHI0093, DOE Case No. S-104,777 awarded by the Department of Energy. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2074149 | Jacobs | Mar 1937 | A |
3768923 | Fradenburgh | Oct 1973 | A |
4641039 | Carre | Feb 1987 | A |
4653982 | Kojima et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4692095 | Lawson-Tancred | Sep 1987 | A |
4710101 | Jamieson | Dec 1987 | A |
5630705 | Eikelenboom | May 1997 | A |
6612810 | Olsen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6726439 | Mikhail et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
20030123973 | Murakami | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030138315 | Brueckner | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030223868 | Dawson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
004428731 | Feb 1996 | DE |
019929386 | Jun 2000 | DE |
1 327 773 | Jul 2003 | EP |
59-20871 | May 1984 | JP |
59-160866 | Oct 1984 | JP |
2001-132615 | May 2001 | JP |
WO 02077449 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 03036082 | May 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030230898 A1 | Dec 2003 | US |