Digital microfluidic devices use independent electrodes to propel, split, and join droplets in a confined environment, thereby providing a “lab-on-a-chip.” Digital microfluidic devices are alternatively referred to as electrowetting on dielectric, or “EWoD,” to further differentiate the method from competing microfluidic systems that rely on electrophoretic flow and/or micropumps. A 2012 review of the electrowetting technology was provided by Wheeler in “Digital Microfluidics,” Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2012, 5:413-40, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The technique allows sample preparation, assays, and synthetic chemistry to be performed with tiny quantities of both samples and reagents. In recent years, controlled droplet manipulation in microfluidic cells using electrowetting has become commercially-viable; and there are now products available from large life science companies, such as Oxford Nanopore.
Most of the literature reports on EWoD involve so-called “direct drive” devices (a.k.a. “segmented” devices), whereby ten to several hundred electrodes are directly driven with a controller. While segmented devices are easy to fabricate, the number of electrodes is limited by space and driving constraints. Accordingly, it is not possible to perform massive parallel assays, reactions, etc. in direct drive devices. In comparison, “active matrix” devices (a.k.a. active matrix EWoD, a.k.a. AM-EWoD) devices can have many thousands, hundreds of thousands or even millions of addressable electrodes. In AM-EWoD devices electrodes are typically switched by thin-film transistors (TFTs) and droplet motion is programmable so that AM-EWoD arrays can be used as general purpose devices that allow great freedom for controlling multiple droplets and executing simultaneous analytical processes.
For active matrix devices, the drive signals are often output from a controller to gate and scan drivers that, in turn, provide the required current-voltage inputs to active the various TFT in the active matrix. However, controller-drivers capable of receiving, e.g., image data, and outputting the necessary current-voltage inputs to active the TFTs are commercially available. See e.g., a variety of controller-drivers available from UltraChip.
Having a high density of electrodes for all areas of the AM-EWoD device is not always necessary, especially if complex functions are not being carried out at all locations. Having high density electrodes at all locations requires faster (and more expensive) drivers and also increase the amount of data processing required. In some cases, it would be beneficial to have larger electrodes in some areas and smaller electrodes in other areas. Traditionally, groups of electrodes (i.e., “ganged” electrodes) have been used to represent larger structures than the base (smaller) electrode size. Nonetheless, combining smaller electrodes to represent larger ones increases the complexity of the system due to the increased number of drive lines and data requirements. U.S. Published Pat. Appl. No. 2016/0184823 proposes a solution to this problem. It discloses electrode sub-arrays of 8 different sizes, however, the architecture of the '823 publication is not suitable to create subarrays of different sized electrodes on the same TFT platform due to drive line and geometry requirements. In fact, in the '823 publication the miniature electrode arrangement must spansthe larger electrodes, to enable retention of the square symmetry and construction of identically sized droplets on both the miniature- and regular-sized subarrays.
The present application addresses the shortcomings of the prior art by providing an alternate architecture for an AM-EWoD with variable electrode size areas. In one instance, the invention provides a digital microfluidic device having two areas of different electrode densities, i.e., a high-density (a.k.a. “high-res”) area, and a low density (a.k.a. “low-res”). Such a design will allow a user to perform droplet manipulation where needed. Overall, such a configuration simplifies the fabrication of a device while also simplifying the data handling associated with the sensing functions.
In one aspect, the digital microfluidic device includes a substrate and a controller. The substrate includes a first high-resolution area and a second low-resolution area, and a hydrophobic layer. The first area includes a first plurality of electrodes having a first density of D1 electrodes/unit area, and a first set of thin-film-transistors coupled to the first plurality of electrodes. The second area includes a second plurality of electrodes having a second density of D2 electrodes/unit area, where D2<D1, and a second set of thin-film-transistors coupled to the second plurality of electrodes. The unit area can be any standard of unit area, such as mm2, cm2, or in2. The hydrophobic layer covers both the first and second pluralities of electrodes and the first and second sets of thin-film-transistors. The controller is operatively coupled to the first set and second set of thin-film-transistors and configured to provide a propulsion voltage to at least a portion of the first plurality of electrodes and at least a portion of the second plurality of electrodes. In one embodiment, a ratio D1:D2 is equal to about 2n, n being a natural number. For example, the ratio D1:D2 may be equal to about 2, 4, 8, or 16. In another embodiment, the ratio D1:D2 is equal to about 3, 5, 6, 7, 9 or other integer numbers not equal to 2n. In a further embodiment, the electrodes of the first plurality may be from about 25 μm to about 200 μm in size. In an additional embodiment, the electrodes of the second plurality may be from about 100 μm to about 800 μm in size. The first area may be smaller than the second area, and the first plurality of electrodes may be arranged in a square or rectangular subarray. The hydrophobic layer may be made of an insulating material, or a dielectric layer may be interposed between the hydrophobic layer and the first and second pluralities of electrodes.
In one embodiment, the device further includes one or more fluid reservoirs operably connected to the first area through reservoir outlets. The device may include more than one high-resolution areas, each high-resolution area being connected to its set of thin-film-transistors and one or more reservoirs. In representative embodiments, the microfluidic device further includes a singular top electrode, a top hydrophobic layer covering the singular top electrode and a spacer separating the hydrophobic layer and the top hydrophobic layer and creating a microfluidic cell gap between the hydrophobic layer and the top hydrophobic layer. A top dielectric layer may be interposed between the top hydrophobic layer and the singular top electrode. In one embodiment, he cell gap is from about 20 μm to 500 μm. In one embodiment, the top electrode includes at least one light-transmissive region, for example 10 mm2 in area, to enable visual or spectrophotometric monitoring of fluid droplets inside the device.
In a second aspect, a digital microfluidic device, including (i) a substrate comprising a first high-resolution area comprising a first plurality of electrodes, each of the first plurality of electrodes being in electrical communication with a first plurality of source lines, the first plurality of source lines having a first source line density of D1 source lines/unit area, as well as a first set of thin-film-transistors coupled to the first plurality of electrodes and the first plurality of source lines. The substrate additionally includes a second low-resolution area comprising a second plurality of electrodes, each of the second plurality of electrodes being in electrical communication with a second plurality of source lines, the second plurality of source lines having a second source line density of D2 source lines/unit area, wherein D1>D2, and a second set of thin-film-transistors coupled to the second plurality of electrodes and the second plurality of source lines. The substrate includes a hydrophobic layer covering both the first and second pluralities of electrodes as well as the first and second sets of thin-film-transistors. The digital microfluidic device also includes (ii) a source driver operatively coupled to the first plurality of source lines and the second plurality of source lines, and configured to provide a source voltage to at least a portion of the first plurality of electrodes and at least a portion of the second plurality of electrodes. In the digital microfluidic device, at least a portion of the second plurality of source lines are connected to one of the first plurality of source lines.
In a third aspect, the present application provides a method for assaying an analyte in a sample with the digital microfluidic device of the above first aspect. The method includes: depositing a sample droplet on the surface of the high-resolution area of the device; subjecting the droplet to one or more processing steps selected from the group consisting of diluting, mixing, sizing, and combinations thereof, to form a fluid containing an assay product; transferring a droplet of the fluid containing the assay product to the surface of the low-resolution area of the device; detecting the assay product; and optionally measuring the concentration of the assay product. In one embodiment, the analyte is a diagnostic biomarker that may be detected and quantified by binding to an antibody matching the biomarker, for example in an enzyme-linked, immunosorbent assay.
As indicated above, the present invention provides an active matrix electrowetting on dielectric (AM-EWoD) device including an array of different sized electrodes on a thin-film transistor (TFT) platform, i.e., as shown in
Variable electrode sizes make better use of the surface available on the AM-EWoD device, and advanced functionality can be added in without increasing the overall complexity. In one example embodiment, the array includes one or more high-density, high resolution areas where subarrays of miniature electrodes are located. This miniature subarray implementation allows for improved droplet sizing (e.g., splitting) that is fully compatible with metering systems and is designed to result in the best possible size control. Moreover, miniature electrode areas allow for greater concentration ranges and will reduce the number of serial dilution steeps that are needed in order to reach desired concentrations.
The miniature electrode, high-resolution areas can include locations where a “regular” size droplet can be created/assembled and fed into areas containing subarrays of regular- or larger-sized electrodes. The areas are compatible with TFT manufacturing and can easily span the main digital microfluidic (DMF) array of an EWoD device. The high-resolution areas will increase the number of diffusion interfaces and facilitate more complete mixing. This technique is then fully compatible with standard mixing techniques.
A typical AM-EWoD device consists of a thin film transistor backplane with an exposed array of regularly shaped electrodes that may be arranged as pixels. The pixels may be controllable as an active matrix, thereby allowing for the manipulation of sample droplets. The array is usually coated with a dielectric material, followed by a coating of hydrophobic material. The fundamental operation of a typical EWoD device is illustrated in the sectional image of
While it is possible to have a single layer for both the dielectric and hydrophobic functions, such layers typically require thick inorganic layers (to prevent pinholes) with resulting low dielectric constants, thereby requiring more than 100V for droplet movement. To achieve low voltage actuation, it is usually better to have a thin inorganic layer for high capacitance and to be pinhole free, topped by a thin organic hydrophobic layer. With this combination it is possible to have electrowetting operation with voltages in the range+/−10 to +/−50V, which is in the range that can be supplied by conventional TFT arrays.
When a voltage differential is applied between adjacent electrodes, the voltage on one electrode attracts opposite charges in the droplet at the dielectric-to-droplet interface, and the droplet moves toward this electrode, as illustrated in
As shown in
As illustrated in
The architecture of an exemplary, TFT-switched, propulsion electrode is shown in
The hydrophobic layer 407 can be constructed from one or a blend of fluoropolymers, such as PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene), FEP (fluorinated ethylene propylene), PVF (polyvinylfluoride), PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride), PCTFE (polychlorotrifluoroethylene), PFA (perfluoroalkoxy polymer), FEP (fluorinated ethylene-propylene), ETFE (polyethylenetetrafluoroethylene), and ECTFE (polyethylenechlorotrifluoroethylene). Commercially available fluoropolymers Teflon® AF (Sigma-Aldrich, Milwaukee, Wis.) and FluoroPel′ coatings from Cytonix (Beltsville, Md.), which can be spin coated over the dielectric layer 408. An advantage of fluoropolymer films is that they can be highly inert and can remain hydrophobic even after exposure to oxidizing treatments such as corona treatment and plasma oxidation. Coatings having higher contact angles may be fabricated from one or more superhydrophobic materials. Contact angles on superhydrophobic materials typically exceed 150°, meaning that only a small percentage of a droplet base is in contact with the surface. This imparts an almost spherical shape to the water droplet. Certain fluorinated silanes, perfluoroalkyls, perfluoropolyethers and RF plasma-formed superhydrophobic materials have found use as coating layers in electrowetting applications and render it relatively easier to slide along the surface. Some types of composite materials are characterized by chemically heterogeneous surfaces where one component provides roughness and the other provides low surface energy so as to produce a coating with superhydrophobic characteristics. Biomimetic superhydrophobic coatings rely on a delicate micro or nano structure for their repellence, but care should be taken as such structures tend to be easily damaged by abrasion or cleaning.
Variable Electrode Size Areas
In one aspect of the invention, the general layout of the thin film transistor array is modified by partitioning into two or more areas (See
Gate Source Line Density
Unless otherwise specified, the term “line density” refers to the number of source or gate driver lines per surface area unit of a subarray. If along the source driver of the array there are N areas containing subarrays of line density a or b, where the ratio a:b=Q, then, assuming there are a number X of areas of density a, it can be shown that the ratio Rlines between the source/gate lines required when N is all a (Na) to those required when N is comprised of a and b (Nab) is as set out in equation (1):
For large N, Rlines approaches Q. Thus, there is immediate benefit to reducing the number of required source and gate lines. Likewise, the array may include several areas containing subarrays of decreasing line density, for example area X1 of density a, area X2 of density b, and area X3 of density c, and so on, where a>b>c>d> . . . , then it can be shown that Runes is as set out in equation (2):
Since Σ1zones X=N, then R as per equation (2) is necessarily greater than 1, thereby proving that Qn is greater than 1, which it is, given that X1, X2, X3 . . . are of lower density than X1.
Furthermore, it can be shown that ratio Rdata comparing the data density in the instance when all the N areas are of line density a (Na) to that when N is comprised of a and b (Nab) is as set out in equation (3), X and Y being the number of areas having density a for the source and the gate lines, respectively:
It is to be noted that the product XY≤N2 because X and Y can be at most equal to N, that is, the number of areas along either the driver or source side that can be of electrode density a. For diminishing X and Y, the ratio approaches Q2. For large X, the ratio approaches the value of 1. In sum, the benefits deriving from the variable electrode size areas include a source/gate driver complexity approaching the value of Q and data complexity nearing the value of Q2.
The diagram of
An exemplary routing for source and driver lines is shown in
Illustrated in
Embodiments where the D1:D2 ratio is equal to 3, 5, 6, 7, 9 or other integers not equal to 2n are also contemplated. In one instance, the size of the area 50 electrodes may be in a range from about 25 μm to about 200 μm, while those of area 52 may fall in the range between about 100 μm to about 800 μm. Accordingly, if the electrodes of area 50 are 50 μm in size, the ratio D1:D2 may be 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, etc. depending on the size chosen for the electrodes of area 52.
In one embodiment, area 50 is placed closer to upper and left edges of the array, and from there the density decreases moving away from the edges. This placement enables reducing the line density of the subarrays when crossing from area 50 into area 52. Alternatively, the line density may be kept constant along each row or column, but connections are not made to the pixels themselves.
The schematic drawing of
Thereafter, the sample droplets may be transferred to low-resolution zone 63 for detecting and measuring the concentration of the assay product. Example detection and measuring techniques include spectrophotometry in the visible, UV, and IR ranges, time-resolved spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, phosphorescence spectroscopy, and potentiodynamic electrochemical measurements such as cyclic voltammetry (CV). In instances where the analyte is a diagnostic biomarker, for example a protein associated with a given disease or disorder, the sample droplet may be mixed with a droplet of a solution containing an antibody directed against the protein to be measured. In an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the antibody is linked to an enzyme, and another droplet, this time of a substance containing the enzyme's substrate, is added. The subsequent reaction produces a detectable signal, most commonly a color change that may be detected and measured at one or more pixels in the low-resolution area.
If the average diameter of sample droplets measures about n high-resolution pixels in length, then a high density area should preferably include at least 2n pixels in order to provide sufficient space for droplet manipulation. By limiting the share of source and/or drive lines dedicated to generating high-resolution areas to about 25% to 50% of the total, gate and/or source driver complexity is reduced, as is data complexity. This in turn implies a gate/source requirement reduction of about 30% to 60% and a 2.3- to 3.4-fold reduction in the amount of data.
From the foregoing, it will be seen that the present invention can provide for a device having high complexity only in areas where it is warranted, thereby keeping overall complexity at a minimum and lowering manufacturing and operating costs alike. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous changes and modifications can be made in the specific embodiments of the invention described above without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the whole of the foregoing description is to be interpreted in an illustrative and not in a limitative sense.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/943,295, filed Dec. 4, 2019. All patents and publications disclosed herein are incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62943295 | Dec 2019 | US |