1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a manipulator arm drive system that can be operated in several rate modes. The variable mode manipulator arm drive system of the invention can be operated in a variable rate mode, a proportional rate mode, and a force feedback mode. It can also be hydraulically operated subsea.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Prior art manipulator arms are operable in two primary modes, rate mode and spatially correspondent (“SC”) mode. In rate mode, each of the manipulator degrees-of-freedom (DOF) is controlled by an actuator which in turn is controlled via a directional control valve that is either fully on or fully off. While the term “rate mode” is familiar to those skilled in the manipulator arm art, it does not provide a literal description of the functional capabilities of this mode. In prior art rate mode, the manipulator joint is either moving at full speed or it is completely stopped. In prior art rate mode, the rate of movement or velocity of the manipulator arm is not controlled.
A rate mode manipulator arm and drive system suitable for subsea applications is shown in
Prior art rate mode provides a more awkward method of controlling a manipulator arm than SC mode; however, rate mode manipulation is simpler and less costly to implement than SC mode manipulation. A rate mode manipulator is also more reliable than an SC mode manipulator because it requires less electronics than an SC mode manipulator.
In the SC mode (also known as “position controlled mode”), the position of each manipulator arm joint is known and controlled. Typically, an SC manipulator system comprises two parts: a master and a slave. The master is usually a hand controller that is equipped with a number of joints whose angular position is measured and monitored as the operator moves the controller. Generally, the master has a joint arrangement that mimics the joint arrangement of the slave. The slave is the manipulator itself. The slave will move in proportion to the master hand controller. If a joint on the master is moved slowly, the slave joint will move slowly. If the master is moved quickly, the slave will move quickly. An SC mode manipulator arm and drive system is shown in
Prior art SC manipulators operate in “closed-loop” mode, which uses an error signal that represents the position of each and every joint on the slave. This signal is continuously compared to the desired joint position (as indicated by the position of the master's matching joint) and the direction and magnitude of the corresponding control valve is modulated as necessary according to some sort of algorithm which is usually a variant of a proportional, integral, derivative (PID) loop.
Prior art SC mode manipulator systems have several problems. Each joint of the slave must be equipped with a position feedback device such as an encoder, resolver, or potentiometer. The control algorithm absolutely must have a reliable signal from this device in order for the manipulator to work. If any of the feedback devices fail, then the manipulator is unusable.
The velocity and acceleration of the slave joints must be variable and, preferably, stepless. Traditionally, this has been achieved by using hydraulic servo valves which suffer four disadvantages, which are high cost, propensity for failure due to lack of fluid cleanliness, high leakage rate, and high pressure drop at high flow rates. In order to increase the longevity of the SC manipulator, an isolate hydraulic power unit (HPU) is often required. This adds to the cost, weight and complexity of the system.
SC mode manipulators are easier than rate mode manipulators to operate. They also provide the operator with a fluid touch. An SC mode manipulator requires more responsive valves and electronics than a rate mode manipulator. This results in increased complexity and reduced reliability for an SC mode manipulator versus a rate mode manipulator.
A preferred embodiment of the invention is directed to a variable and adjustable rate controlled drive system for a manipulator. In a preferred embodiment, this system is selectively operable in one of two alternative modes within the rate mode, as shown in
In one preferred embodiment, the invention comprises a proportional mode controller 14 configured to output a proportional mode control signal responsive to the position of the proportional mode controller, as shown in
In this embodiment, the invention further comprises a variable rate mode controller 12 configured to output a variable rate mode control signal responsive to a preselected setting, as shown in
In this embodiment, the invention further comprises a mode selector device 10 operatively coupled to the local control computer 22 (LCC) so as to cause the LCC to selectively receive at least one of the variable rate mode control signal and the proportional mode control signal and to selectively output one of the variable rate mode control signal and the proportional mode control signal as the selected mode control signal, as shown in
In a preferred embodiment, the invention also includes a fourth mode, which is the conventional on or off rate mode. In this fourth mode, the operator actuates a rate controller button 10, as shown in
The variable rate mode allows the flow rate of each of the proportional valves to be preset so that when a rate controller button 10 is depressed, the proportional valve 30 opens to a preset percentage of its full open position. In the preferred embodiment shown in
The advantage of this mode is that it allows the operator to compensate for variations in hydraulic performance that occur with depth or temperature changes frequently encountered in a subsea environment. It also allows the operator to adjust joint velocity to suit personal preference. This scheme does not require any hardware located at the actuator beyond a Rate hand controller.
In another preferred embodiment, the operator may change the flow settings via software. Such changes would normally be implemented periodically and not during actual manipulator operations.
As shown in
As shown in
Hydraulic fluid ejected from the proportional valve through line 32 can extend piston 42. In this mode, hydraulic fluid is returned from the piston housing to the proportional valve through line 34. Piston 42 attached to manipulator arm 44 such that extension of the piston causes movement of the manipulator arm in a first direction and retraction of the piston causes movement of the manipulator arm in a second direction, opposite to the first direction. The proportional valve alignment can be reversed to reverse the direction of hydraulic fluid flow, such that hydraulic fluid is ejected from the proportional valve through line 34 and returned to the proportional valve through line 32. In this mode of operation, the piston will be retracted. The other degrees-of-freedom on the manipulator arm work in similar fashion.
The proportional rate mode allows the operator to operate the manipulator without position feedback from the joints. In this mode, each of the proportional valve or valves deliver flow in proportion to the force or displacement of the associated analog input device on the proportional mode controller 14. In the preferred embodiment, shown in
In a preferred embodiment, the hand controller 14 is a simple game console controller, such as the Sony Play Station 2 is suitable. As the operator displaces the associated control further or harder, the proportional valve opens further and increases the velocity of the joint. In a preferred embodiment, the proportional valve is located subsea.
The force feedback rate mode uses the same controller 14 as that used in the proportional rate mode but with the addition of simplified “force feedback”. In order to implement this mode, each of the hydraulic circuits between the proportional valve and its associated actuator is equipped with a pressure transmitter 36, as shown in
The foregoing disclosure and description of the inventions are illustrative and explanatory. Various changes in the size, shape, and materials, as well as in the details of the illustrative construction and/or a illustrative method may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of Provisional Application 60/774,569, filed Feb. 17, 2006.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60774569 | Feb 2006 | US |