The present invention relates to optical tomographic (OT) imaging systems in general, and, more particularly, variable-motion optical tomography (VOT) where the motion of a small object, such as a biological cell, for example, is controlled by a mechanical motion system whose motion is not necessarily constant and/or unidirectional, but may be variable and multi-directional.
U.S. application Ser. No. 09/927,151 of Alan C. Nelson, filed Aug. 10, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,522,775 issued Feb. 18, 2003, entitled “APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR IMAGING SMALL OBJECTS IN A FLOW STREAM USING OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY,” (hereinafter called the FOT design) is incorporated herein by this reference. In the aforesaid Nelson patent application, cell motion is accomplished in a flow stream, wherein cells in suspension move with constant velocity along the single flow axis of a capillary tube. The FOT design does not address the more general case where cell velocity and/or direction of motion are variable.
In one embodiment, the present invention provides a method for variable-motion optical tomography (VOT), wherein motion of an object of interest, such as a cell, has a variable velocity relative to the light path that can be varied on a cell-by-cell basis. Cell velocity is controlled in one example by packing cells into a capillary tube, or any other linear substrate that provides optically equivalent 360 degree viewing access, so that the cells are stationary within the capillary tube, while the capillary tube is translated and rotated mechanically through an optical tomography reconstruction cylinder. The capillary tube motion may advantageously be controlled in a start-and-stop fashion and translated and rotated at any velocity for any motion interval, under the control of a computer program.
The invention is described herein with respect to specific examples relating to biological cells, however, it will be understood that these examples are for the purpose of illustrating the principals of the invention, and that the invention is not so limited. In one example, constructing a three-dimensional distribution of point densities and emission intensities within a microscopic volume allows the measurement of density and fluorescence at any location within the microscopic volume and determines the location of structures, molecules or molecular probes of interest. By using tagged molecular probes, the quantity of probes that attach to specific structures in the microscopic object may be measured. For illustrative purposes, an object such as a biological cell may be labeled with at least one tagged molecular probe, and the measured amount and location of this probe may yield important information about the disease state of the cell, including, but not limited to, various cancers such as lung, colon, prostate, breast, cervical and ovarian cancers, or infectious agents.
Referring now to
It will be recognized that the curved surface of the capillary tube will act as a cylindrical lens and that this focusing effect may not be desirable in a projection system. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the bending of photons by the tube can be eliminated if the spaces between the point source and the tube and between the tube and the detector surfaces are filled with a material 54 whose index of refraction matches that of the capillary tube and that the tube can be optically coupled (with oil or a gel, for example) to the space filling material.
Consider the present example of cells packed into a capillary tube. The cells may preferably be packed single file so that they do not overlap. The density of packing whole cells of about 100 microns in diameter into a capillary tube with diameter less than 100 microns can be roughly 100 cells per centimeter of tube length. For bare nuclei of about 20 microns in diameter, the packing can be roughly 500 nuclei per centimeter of tube length where the tube diameter is proportional to the object size, about 20 microns in this case. Thus, within several centimeters of capillary tube length, a few thousand non-overlapping bare nuclei can be packed. By translating the tube along its central axis 4, motion in the z-direction can be achieved. Moving the tube in the x,y-directions allows objects within the tube to be centered, as necessary, in the reconstruction cylinder of the optical tomography system. By rotating the tube around its central axis 4, a multiplicity of radial projection views can be produced. Moving the tube in the z-direction with constant velocity and no rotation simulates the special case of flow optical tomography.
One advantage of moving a tube filled with cells that are otherwise stationary inside the tube is that objects of interest can be stopped, then rotated, at speeds that permit nearly optimal exposure for optical tomography on a cell-by-cell basis. That is, the signal to noise ratio of the projection images can be improved to produce better images than may be usually produced at constant speeds and direction typical of flow systems. Objects that are not of interest can be moved out of the imaging system swiftly, so as to gain overall speed in analyzing cells of interest in a sample consisting of a multitude of cells. Additionally, the ability to stop on an object of interest, then rotate as needed for multiple projections, nearly eliminates motion artifacts. Still further, the motion system can be guided at submicron movements and can advantageously be applied in a manner that allows sampling of the cell at a resolution finer than that afforded by the pixel size of the detector. More particularly, the Nyquist sampling factor of 2 could be managed by the motion system moving in increments that fill half a pixel width, for example. Similarly, the motion system can compensate for the imperfect fill factor of the detector.
Referring now to
The computer 7 is coupled to transmit data, control signals and timing signals to the point sources 10b, sensing elements 12 and motors. The computer may comprise a known computer or plurality of computers and array processors adequate for image acquisition and image reconstruction processing.
The reconstruction cylinder in this new configuration, can be designed more optimally as compared to the FOT design. In particular, because the object of interest can be rotated, a reconstruction cylinder may advantageously be designed with a single point source and detector pair that creates and captures the projection image (sometimes known as a shadowgram) at each rotation angle.
In the example embodiment shown in
In this design, a semicircle of equally spaced point sources have opposing detector arrays positioned around an opposite semicircle, and all elements of the imaging system are positioned on the same central plane generally perpendicular to the tube axis. However, the point source/detector combinations need not lie on the same central plane, and point sources may be spaced at unequal intervals and advantageously be interspersed between detector arrays.
As also shown in
Referring now to
In the preceding example, 3D image reconstruction is accomplished using 2D projection images from cone beam geometry. It is also possible to use fan beam geometry whereby the 3D image is generated by stacking contiguous planar images reconstructed from linear (1D) projections using fan beam reconstruction algorithms. With fan beam geometry, the plurality of optical point sources 10b that are collimated to emit fan-beams, in conjunction with opposing detectors 12 mounted around a circumference of the tube can sample multiple projection angles through the entire cell 1 as it is moved past the sources. A cell is thus optically sectioned with projections through the cell that can be reconstructed to form a 2D slice in the x-y plane. By stacking or mathematically combining sequential slices, a 3D picture of the cell will emerge. The 3D picture of the cell can yield quantitative measures of sub-cellular structures and the location and amount of tagged molecular probes that provide diagnostic information.
Light Source.
Each source may have the same general characteristics, preferably:
There are several options that can be employed to create optical point sources, such as:
The geometry is such that, the closer the point source to the object of interest (the cell), the higher the magnification due to the wider geometric angle that is subtended by an object closer to the source. Magnification in a simple projection system is approximately M=(A+B)/A, where A is the distance between the point source and the object (cell) and B is the distance between the object and the detector. Conversely, if the required resolution is known in advance of the system design, then the geometry can be optimized for that particular resolution. For background, those skilled in the art are directed to Blass, M., editor-in-chief, Handbook of Optics: Fiber Optics and Nonlinear Optics, 2nd ed., Vol. IV, Mcgraw-Hill, 2001.
Referring now to
Image Reconstruction.
The most common and easily implemented reconstruction algorithms, known as filtered backprojection methods, are derived from a similar paradigm in computerized x-ray tomography (CT) using cone-beam and fan-beam geometry. (See the following references, for example, Kak, A. C. and Slaney, M., Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging, IEEE Press, New York, 1988, and Herman, G, Image Reconstruction from Projections: The Fundamentals of Computerized Tomography, Academic Press, New York, 1980.) These methods are based on theorems for Radon transforms with modifications that reflect the particular geometry of the source/detector configuration and the ray paths in the irradiating beam. However, in the case of clinical x-ray CT, the human subject is usually held motionless while the x-ray source and detector arrays may move along an arc or helix around the patient to collect data from multiple projection angles. Then the human subject may be repositioned along the z-axis and another set of data is collected, etc. Alternatively, in the more modern clinical helical CT, the patient may be continuously translated in the z-direction while the source-detector assembly rotates continuously to provide helical projection data, which is then interpolated to provide projections orthogonal to the patient z-axis.
In flow optical tomography (FOT) and variable-motion optical tomography (VOT), the object (a cell) is moved relative to the stationary sources and detector arrays wherein the plurality of source/detector systems acquire data in synchrony with specific gated time points along the cell velocity vector in a fashion that generates multiple projection angle data within a given slice or volume. For slice-by-slice scanning using a fan beam, the reconstruction algorithm will compute a 2D image of a plane perpendicular to the axis of motion, and the serial stacking of multiple slices will generate the 3D picture of the object where contrast is a function of the variations in the x-ray attenuation coefficient or optical absorption coefficient as a measure of density within the object for CT or flow optical tomography, respectively. For volumetric, cone-beam scanning the reconstruction algorithm computes a 3D image of a volume within the cell or other object directly from planar transmission or emission optical projections, where the contrast is a function of the optical density and/or tagged probe density distribution within the imaged object.
It may be desirable for either the transmission data to produce the cell density reconstruction or for the emission data (from internal sources, if any) to reconstruct the labeled probe distribution, or both, to employ image reconstruction algorithms other than filtered backprojection. The general class known as iterative reconstruction algorithms is more efficacious in some instances, especially for emission tomography or, when it is possible, as in the instance of the current invention where the axial symmetry and tricompartmental nature of the object are known, to incorporate a priori information into the reconstruction algorithm to improve the quality of the reconstruction (See, for example, Gilbert, P., “Iterative Methods for the Three-dimensional Reconstruction of an Object from Projections,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 36:105–17, 1972, and other references noted hereinabove).
Referring now to
The invention has been described herein in considerable detail in order to comply with the Patent Statutes and to provide those skilled in the art with the information needed to apply the novel principles of the present invention, and to construct and use such exemplary and specialized components as are required. However, it is to be understood that the invention may be carried out by specifically different equipment, and devices and reconstruction algorithms, and that various modifications, both as to the equipment details and operating procedures, may be accomplished without departing from the true spirit and scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3470373 | Brewer | Sep 1969 | A |
3497690 | Wheeless, Jr. | Feb 1970 | A |
3598471 | Baldwin | Aug 1971 | A |
3657537 | Wheeless, Jr. | Apr 1972 | A |
3748468 | Hartman | Jul 1973 | A |
3833762 | Gudmundsen | Sep 1974 | A |
3960449 | Carlton | Jun 1976 | A |
3999047 | Green | Dec 1976 | A |
4175860 | Bacus | Nov 1979 | A |
4183623 | Haines | Jan 1980 | A |
4200353 | Hoffman | Apr 1980 | A |
4293221 | Kay | Oct 1981 | A |
4657676 | Keary | Apr 1987 | A |
4858128 | Nowak | Aug 1989 | A |
4891829 | Deckman | Jan 1990 | A |
4966576 | Schulz | Oct 1990 | A |
5141609 | Sweedler et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5308990 | Takahashi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5312535 | Waska et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321501 | Swanson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5402460 | Johnson | Mar 1995 | A |
5630938 | Feller | May 1997 | A |
5668887 | Parker et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676631 | Kunz | Oct 1997 | A |
5680484 | Ohyama et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5710429 | Alfano et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5741411 | Yeung et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5760901 | Hill | Jun 1998 | A |
5760951 | Dixon et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5828408 | Mottin et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5848123 | Strommer | Dec 1998 | A |
5880838 | Marx et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5915048 | Hill et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5987158 | Meyer | Nov 1999 | A |
6005617 | Shimamoto et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6026174 | Palcic | Feb 2000 | A |
6038067 | George | Mar 2000 | A |
6072624 | Dixon et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091983 | Alfano et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6165734 | Garini | Dec 2000 | A |
6201628 | Basiji | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211955 | Basiji | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215587 | Alfano et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6248988 | Krantz | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249341 | Basiji et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251586 | Mulshine | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251615 | Oberhardt | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252979 | Lee | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6312914 | Kardos et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330106 | Greenwald et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6388809 | MacAulay | May 2002 | B1 |
6452179 | Coates et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6529614 | Chao et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6591003 | Chu et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
20010012069 | Derndinger et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020045525 | Marziali | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020161534 | Adler et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173034 | Barbera-Guillem | Nov 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 02095476 | Nov 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030199758 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |