This invention relates generally to the field of variable nozzle turbochargers and, more particularly, to an improved vane design for a plurality of pivoting vanes within a turbine housing of the variable nozzle turbocharger.
A variable nozzle turbocharger generally comprises a center housing having a turbine housing attached at one end, and a compressor housing attached at an opposite end. A shaft is rotatably disposed within a bearing assembly contained within the center housing. A turbine or turbine wheel is attached to one shaft end and is carried within the turbine housing, and a compressor impeller is attached to an opposite shaft end and is carried within the compressor housing.
Multiple vanes 20 are mounted to the nozzle ring 28 using vane pins 22 that project perpendicularly outwardly from the vanes 20. Each vane pin 22 is attached to a Vane arm 24, and the vane arms 24 are received in a rotatably mounted unison ring 28. An actuator assembly is connected with the unison ring 26 and is configured to rotate the unison ring 26 in one direction or the other as necessary to move the vanes 20 radially, with respect to an axis of rotation of the turbine wheel 30, outwardly or inwardly to respectively increase or decrease the pressure differential and to modify the flow of exhaust gas through the turbine wheel 30. As the unison ring 26 is rotated, the vane arms 24 are caused to move, and the movement of the vane arms 24 causes the vanes 20 to pivot via rotation of the vane pins 24 and open or close a throat area of the nozzle depending on the rotational direction of the unison ring 26.
An example of a known turbocharger employing such a variable nozzle assembly is disclosed in WO 2004/022926 A.
The vanes are generally designed having an airfoil shape that is configured to both provide a complementary fit with adjacent vanes when placed in a closed position, and to provide for the passage of exhaust gas within the turbine housing to the turbine wheel when placed in an open position. Such a vane has a leading edge or nose having a first radius of curvature and a trailing edge or tail having a substantially smaller second radius of curvature connected by an inner airfoil surface on an inner side of the vane and an outer airfoil surface on an outer side of the vane. In this vane design, the outer airfoil surface is convex in shape, while the inner airfoil surface is convex in shape at the leading edge and concave in shape towards the trailing edge. The inner and outer airfoil surfaces are defined by a substantially continuous curve which complement each other. As used herein, the vane surfaces are characterized as “concave” or “convex” relative to the interior (not the exterior) of the vane. The asymmetric shape of such a vane results in a curved centerline, which is also commonly referred to as the camberline of the vane. The camberline is the line that runs through the midpoints between the vane inner and outer airfoil surfaces between the leading and trailing edges of the vane. Its meaning is well understood by those skilled in the relevant technical field. Because this vane has a curved camberline, it is a “cambered” vane.
The use of such cambered vanes in variable nozzle turbochargers has resulted in some improvement in aerodynamic effects within the turbine housing. Some particularly useful vane designs are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,709,232 B1. These vane designs reduce unwanted aerodynamic effects within the turbine housing by maintaining a constant rate of exhaust gas acceleration as exhaust gas is passed thereover, thereby reducing unwanted back-pressure within the turbine housing which is known to contribute to losses in turbocharger and turbocharged engine operating efficiencies.
Although the use of cambered vanes has resulted in some improvements in efficiency, it has been discovered that there is a risk to get a reversion of aerodynamic torque acting on the vane surface. In particular, it has been observed that there is usually a negative torque when the nozzle throat area is small and that there is a positive torque when the nozzle throat area is large. The torque is defined as positive when the flow of exhaust gas has enough force to urge the vanes into the open position. The aerodynamic torque reversion affects the functionality of the actuator assembly and the unison ring which cause the vanes to pivot. Having regard to controllability, it is preferable that the torque exercised on the vane has always the same orientation regardless of the vane position. It is even more preferable that the torque is positive and tends to open the nozzle (i.e. increase the throat area of the nozzle).
It is, therefore, desirable that a variable nozzle turbocharger be provided with improved vane operational controllability when compared to conventional turbochargers.
The inventors did extensive research to find the cause of torque reversion in a turbocharger with a variable nozzle assembly having a plurality of cambered vanes positioned annularly around a turbine wheel. They found that the predominant factors are: (a) the position of the vane pivot point, (b) the position of a local extreme of curvature in the convex section of the inner airfoil surface with respect to the pivot point, (c) the shape of the convex section of the inner airfoil surface, and (d) the flow incidence angle of exhaust gas on the vane surface.
Concerning factor (a), it was found that in a coordinate system in which the origin is the vane leading edge, the x-axis runs through the vane trailing edge and the y-axis is normal to the x-axis and runs to the outer side of the vane, it is favorable that the pivot point is located at a position which meets the following expressions:
0.25<Xp/C<0.45, preferably 0.30<Xp/C<0.40;
and
−0.10≦Yp/C≦0.05, preferably −0.10≦Yp/C≦0, most preferably −0.10≦Yp/C≦−0.05,
wherein Xp is a distance between the pivot point and the leading edge on the x-axis, C is a distance between the leading edge and the trailing edge, and Yp is a distance between the pivot point and the camberline of the vane on the y-axis, with negative values of Yp representing a pivot point which is more on the inner side of the vane. It is preferable that the pivot point is located between the outer airfoil surface and the inner airfoil surface.
Concerning factor (b), it was found that a local extreme of curvature in the convex section of the inner airfoil surface has a strong influence on the aerodynamic torque exerted on the vane, in particular if the local extreme is a maximum. It is favorable that in the above-mentioned coordinate system, the local extreme is located at a position which meets the following expression:
0.3<(Xp−Xex)/Xp<0.8, preferably 0.4<(Xp−Xex)/Xp<0.7, most preferably 0.49<(Xp−Xex)/Xp<0.60,
wherein Xp is a distance between the pivot point (Pp) and the leading edge (Ple) on the x-axis, and (Xex) is a distance between the local extreme (Pex) and the leading edge (Ple) on the x-axis.
Concerning factor (c), it was found that the convex section of the inner airfoil surface preferably has a somewhat longish shape. Therefore, it is favorable that in the above-mentioned coordinate system, the local extreme is located at a position which meets the following expression:
0.40<Yex/Xex<0.83,
wherein Xex is a distance between the local extreme and the leading edge on the x-axis, and Yex is a distance between the local extreme and the leading edge on the y-axis.
Concerning factor (d), it was found that when the vanes are placed in the closed position, it is favorable that the flow incidence angle of exhaust gas with respect to a line connecting the leading edge and the pivot point is 5° or more.
In accordance with the invention, the turbocharger meets at least one of the expressions discussed in connection with factors (a), (b), (c), and (d).
Further, it is preferable that the vane leading edge is defined by a circular curve having a radius r which meets the following expression:
0.045<r/Xp<0.08,
wherein Xp is a distance between the pivot point and the leading edge on the x-axis.
Still further, it is preferable that the convex section of the inner airfoil surface is defined by a composite series of curves consisting of a circular curve that defines the leading edge and transitions into a parabolic curve, and optionally a circular or elliptic curve that connects the parabolic curve and the concave section. Also, it is preferable that the outer airfoil surface is defined by a composite series of curves including a circular curve that defines the leading edge and transitions into an elliptic curve.
Finally, it is preferable that when the vanes pivot between a closed position and an open position, a ratio Rle/Rte of a radius Rle tangent to the leading edges (Ple) of the vanes (20) to a radius Rte tangent to the trailing edges (Pte) ranges from 1.03 to 1.5.
The invention will be more clearly understood with reference to the following drawings wherein:
As shown in
The vane has a certain length which is defined as the length of the chord (straight line) C that runs between the leading and trailing vane edges Ple, Pte. Furthermore, the vane has a pivot point Pp, so it can rotate.
The composite series of curves defining the outer airfoil surface 2 includes a section having the shape of a truncated ellipse for the first 10 or 20% of the vane length C and a section having a constant or decreasing radius of curvature for the rest of the vane length C. The composite series of curves defining the inner airfoil surface 4 includes a convex section that is defined by a second order polynomial for the first 20 to 30% of the vane length C and a concave section having a constant or increasing radius of curvature for almost the rest of the vane length C. The end of the convex section is marked by the inflection point. The convex section resembles a parabolic curve that potentially transitions into a short circular or elliptic curve connecting the parabolic curve and the concave section. The vertex of the parabolic curve defines a local extreme of curvature Pex. The midpoints between the inner and outer airfoil surfaces 2, 4 having the above shape define a curved camberline 6. The camberline is almost flat for the first 15 to 25% of the vane length C, at which point the camberline 6 becomes curved.
For defining the positions of the pivot point Pp and the local extreme Pex, the coordinate system shown in
To be more specific, the vane of this embodiment has the following specifications:
Xp/C=0.35;
Yp/C=0.00;
Xp−Xex)/Xp=0.56
Yex/Xex=0.50;
r/Xp=0.05.
As illustrated in
As illustrated by the arrows in
It was confirmed that, in this embodiment, there is no aerodynamic torque reversion when the maximum stagger angle θ of the vane 20 is set such that the flow incidence angle α of exhaust gas is about 5°. In other words, using the vane 20 of this embodiment makes it possible to provide a variable nozzle turbocharger with improved vane operational controllability when compared to conventional turbochargers.
The inventors prepared a large number of vanes having different vane profiles and investigated the influence of the vane profile on operational controllability and turbocharger operating efficiency by using flow analysis and other methods. The aerodynamic torque was measured at two stagger angles θ near the minimum and maximum stagger angle, and the efficiency was measured at the minimum stagger angle where the throat distance d is maximum.
Among the vane profiles shown in
Altogether, the tests revealed best results for vanes having the local extreme Pex located at about half way between the leading edge Ple and the pivot point Pp. In particular, it is preferred that the local extreme Pex is located at a position where the distance Xex between the local extreme Pex and the leading edge Ple on the x-axis meets the expression 0.3<(Xp−Xex)/Xp<0.8, preferably 0.4<(Xp−Xex)/Xp<0.7, and most preferably 0.49<(Xp−Xex)/Xp<0.60.
Also, it was found that the local extreme Pex is preferably located such that the convex section of the inner airfoil surface 2 has a somewhat longish shape. In particular, it is favorable that the local extreme is located at a position Xex, Yex where the respective distances Xex and Yex between the local extreme Pex and the leading edge Ple on the x-axis and the y-axis meet the expression 0.40<Yex/Xex<0.83.
Moreover, the inventors prepared a number of vanes having the same shape as the vane 20 shown in
In
Furthermore,
Moreover, the inventors investigated the influence of the flow incidence angle α of exhaust gas in terms of aerodynamic torque. Using the vane 20 shown in
Although the above findings are considered the key features for defining the cambered vane of this invention, there are other features that affect the controllability of the vanes.
It was found that the radius r defining the circular curve of the leading edge Ple and the distance Xp between the pivot point Pp and the leading edge Ple on the x-axis preferably meet the expression 0.045<r/Xp<0.08. Setting the radius r within this range reduces the sensitivity of the vane against variation of flow incidence.
Further, it was confirmed that it is favorable to set the minimum and maximum stagger angles θ of the vane such that the ratio Rle/Rte of the radius Rle tangent to the vane leading edges Ple to the radius Rte tangent to the vane trailing axis Pte range from 1.03 to 1.5. This is in contrast to conventional turbochargers where the typical range Rle/Rte is between 1.05 and 1.7.
Also, it was found that the shape of the convex section of the inner airfoil surface 4 is not restricted to a parabolic curve or a curve having a local maximum between the leading edge Ple and the inflection point marking the transition to the concave section, but that a second order polynomial having a local minimum is suitable as well. However, a local maximum is preferred.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2004/012992 | 11/16/2004 | WO | 00 | 10/17/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/053579 | 5/26/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4629396 | Lorett | Dec 1986 | A |
5299909 | Wulf | Apr 1994 | A |
5564895 | Agahi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5873696 | Harada et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6709232 | Vogiatzis | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6755612 | Shahpar et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7771162 | Castan | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20020187061 | Arnold | Dec 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10153301 | May 2003 | DE |
1197637 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1635038 | Mar 2006 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080131267 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |