1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a pressure vessel for an air bag inflator or the like and, more particularly, to such a pressure vessel having one or more exit orifices that are adjustable in response to deformation of the pressure vessel.
2. Description of the Background Art
In the prior art, many different types of devices have been used to control the size of exit orifices in a pressure vessel for an air bag inflator or the like for the purpose of controlling the pressure in the pressure vessel. Some examples of such devices are slidable valves, pressure relief valves, movable spools, fabric layers and rupture members. All of these devices have added to the cost and size of air bag inflators and have been subject, in some cases, to improper operation and maintenance problems.
There is a need, therefore, for a new and improved method of controlling the size of such exit orifices. The present invention meets this need.
In accordance with the present invention, the pressure vessel is constructed to deform in a predetermined manner in response to internal pressure in the pressure vessel and such deformation results in an increased size of one or more exit orifices in the present vessel.
Preferably, the pressure vessel is made of a high tensile strength material that has a high or low yield strength. In the case of high yield strength, the enlarged exit orifices will return to their original size without plastic deformation after release of the pressure in the pressure vessel. In the case of low yield strength, the enlarged exit orifices may not return to their original size because of some plastic deformation of the pressure vessel in the area of the exit orifices. A limited amount of such plastic deformation may be acceptable for certain purposes if it does not result in improper combustion of the gas generant in the pressure vessel.
The present invention controls the size of the exit orifices in response to the deformation of the pressure vessel and does not require any other devices for controlling the size of the exit orifices. Accordingly, it is simple and reliable in operation. For air bag inflator pressure vessels, HSLA steels are typically used owing to their balance of availability, performance, cost and weldability. Depending on the shape of the components, material properties and load, a specific thickness and/or shape will be required. For air bag inflators, the gas generant and orifice area will determine the basic operating/combustion pressure. Different generant types operate at different pressures (3,500-7,000 psi) depending on formulation. This means that a pressure vessel with a different gas generant but the same package size will require very different thicknesses to ensure the same structural integrity or deformation to vary the size of the exit orifice or orifices.
Referring to
In the embodiment of
Upon the release of pressure in the pressure vessel 10, it returns to its original shape as shown in
Similarly, as shown in
As an illustrative example, the specifications for the material of the pressure vessels 10 and 20 and the thickness of the deformable portion of the pressure vessels 10 and 20 are as follows:
Referring to the specifications in the above chart, the internal pressure represents the peak combustion pressure during the inflator operation. Depending on the gas generant type, this can vary greatly between approximately 3,000-8,000 psi. Different gas generants operate at lower pressures and thus would allow reduction in material thickness compared to generants that operate at higher pressures.
It is noted, therefore, that the above-identified exemplary specifications will vary depending on the anticipated internal pressure within the pressure vessel as a result of the combustion of the gas generant therein.
As an illustrative example, the specifications for the material of the pressure vessel 30 and the thickness of the deformable portion thereof are as follows:
Referring to the above chart, different steels have similar deflection under the same load. For a given pressure, however, the tensile strength must be compensated by increasing thicknesses. Accordingly, the higher yield material offers greater deflection due to reduced thickness, less permanent deformation and weight reduction, and thus is generally a better option. A preferred material, therefore, is HSLA steel with a minimum yield strength of 550-700 Mpa (70-90 ksi).
It is again noted, therefore, that the specifications for the pressure vessel 30 will vary depending on the anticipated internal pressure therein as a result of combustion of the gas generant.
From the foregoing description, it is apparent that the size of the exit orifices 12, 22 and 32 in the pressure vessels 10, 20 and 30, respectively, are controlled by the deformation of the pressure vessel by the internal pressure therein resulting from the combustion of the gas generant, without requiring any other device for adjusting the size of the exit orifice. This is a simple construction that is predictable and reliable in operation at minimal cost.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5131680 | Coultas et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5213362 | Coultas | May 1993 | A |
5226667 | Coultas | Jul 1993 | A |
5820162 | Fink | Oct 1998 | A |
6106002 | Haesaert et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6497431 | Schramm | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6702323 | Goetz | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7007610 | Karlin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7243948 | Aranzulla et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7398996 | Saito et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7780193 | Hayakawa et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7938443 | Smith | May 2011 | B1 |
8517420 | Fischer | Aug 2013 | B2 |
20090243269 | Braun et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |