The present invention relates to electrical machines such as (but not limited to) electrical generators and, more particularly, to a manifold of a generator rotor which promotes uniform cooling of the windings of the generator rotor.
In a conventional generator having a rotor and a stator, the rotor is provided with field windings that excite the generator while receiving a current from an excitation current source. The stator is provided with windings from which electrical power is output. Typical rotor construction requires that a field winding be assembled bar by bar, into radial slots milled into a rotor body. Containment of the rotor field windings is typically achieved using rotor wedges, rotor teeth and retaining rings. A carbon filled reinforced enclosure (CFRE) rotor eliminates the need for the coil slots milled in the rotor shaft and enables the assembly of a field winding as a single winding module, one for each pole. It is known to use individual radial manifolds under each coil module with a fixed axial spacing between discharge or ventilation holes in the manifolds.
It is desirable to provide a more uniform cooling to the rotor windings. By providing a more uniform cooling to the rotor windings, “hot spots”(areas of very high temperatures) may be avoided. The advanced physical deterioration of generator components (e.g., insulation) at these areas can thus be avoided, thereby extending the operational life of the generator.
A rotor in an electrical machine comprises a magnetic core having at least two poles, a plurality of winding assemblies, one for each pole, and a cylindrical tube enclosing the magnetic core and winding assemblies. The tube includes a plurality of rings having different axial widths. The tube may be formed of a non-metallic material. Each of the rings may be axially spaced apart from an adjacent ring. The rings may be axially spaced apart such that radial discharge slots defined in the magnetic core are axially aligned with respective spaces between the rings. The respective axial widths of the rings located at both axial ends of the tube may be smaller than the axial width of the ring axially located at or near the center of the tube. The respective axial widths of the rings may become progressively smaller than the axial width of the ring axially located at or near the center of the tube as the axial distance away from the center of the tube increases. The rotor may further comprise a plurality of winding braces coupled to at least one of the winding assemblies, the winding braces having different radial heights. The radial heights of the winding braces located at both axial ends of the tube may be smaller than the radial height of the winding brace axially located at or near the center of the tube. The respective radial heights of the winding braces may become progressively smaller than the radial height of the winding brace axially located at or near the center of the tube as the axial distance away from the center of the tube increases. The rotor may further comprise a plurality of winding braces coupled to at least one of the winding assemblies and axially spaced apart from each other, the axial distance between one pair of adjacent winding braces being different than the axial distance between another pair of adjacent winding braces. The respective axial distances between the winding braces located at the ends of the tube may be smaller than the axial distance between the winding braces located at or near the center of the tube. The respective axial distances between adjacent winding braces may become progressively smaller than the axial distance between adjacent winding braces axially located at the center of the tube as the axial distance away from the center of the tube increases. The rotor may further comprise a shield having a plurality of ventilation holes defined therein, the shield being disposed between (i) the tube and (ii) the magnetic core and winding assemblies. The ventilation holes may be circular or elliptical. The ventilation holes may be aligned in respective rows in the axial direction of the shield, and the respective rows of ventilation holes may be axially aligned with respective axial spaces defined between the rings. The ventilation holes may be aligned in respective rows in the axial direction of the shield and the axial distance between the rows may be non-uniform. The distance between the rows of ventilation holes formed in the shield may become progressively smaller as the axial distance away from the center of the shield increases.
A cylindrical tube for enclosing rotor components including a magnetic core having at least two poles and a plurality of winding assemblies comprises a plurality of rings having different axial widths. The tube may be formed of a non-metallic material. Each of the rings may be axially spaced apart from an adjacent ring. The rings may be axially spaced apart such that radial discharge slots defined in the magnetic core are axially aligned with respective spaces between the rings. The respective axial widths of the rings at both axial ends of the tube may be smaller than the axial width of the ring axially located at or near the center of the tube. The respective axial widths of the rings may become progressively smaller than the axial width of the ring axially located at or near the center of the tube as the axial distance away from the center of the tube increases.
After winding assemblies 30 are slid over the parallel sided forging of two-pole magnetic core 12, tube 20 is slid over the assembly. Tube 20 is constructed from a non-metallic low density composite material, such as a carbon fiber-glass fiber composite and is configured to discharge winding ventilation gas to a generator air gap 52 defined between rotor 10 and stator 50. The material forming tube 20 preferably has a high strength to weight ratio.
The respective axial widths of rings 21 vary. For example, the axial width Wa of ring 21a located at the axial center of tube 20 is larger than the axial width Wb of adjacent ring 21b. The axial width Wb of ring 21b is larger than the axial width Wc of ring 21c. Similarly, axial width Wa of ring 21a is larger than the axial width Wd of ring 21d which is in turn larger than the axial width We of ring 21e. The respective axial widths of rings 21 thus become progressively smaller as the axial distance from the center of tube 20 increases. The rings 21 located at the ends of cylinder 20 thus have the smallest axial width. Ring 21a located at the center of tube 20 has the largest axial width Wa.
By varying the respective axial widths of rings 21, the axial distance between successive spaces 22 varies. In particular, the axial distance between successive spaces 22 becomes progressively smaller as the axial distance from the center of tube 20 increases. Tube 20 would by itself thus provide a non-uniform distribution of cooling fluid flow due to the variable separation between spaces 22. By adjusting the respective axial widths of rings 21, the distance between successive spaces 22 forming radial discharge paths for cooling fluid may be adjusted.
Ventilation holes 41 are aligned in respective axial rows. For example, a number of ventilation holes 41 (six ventilation holes 41 shown in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Each of the winding braces 31 is also coupled to a respective one of the rings 21. As illustrated in
The axial spacing between successive winding braces 31 also becomes progressively smaller as the axial distance from the center of tube 20 increases. For example, the axial spacing S2 between the winding braces 31c and 31b is smaller than the axial spacing S1 between the winding braces 31b and 31a. Similarly, the axial spacing S4 between the winding braces 31e and 31d is smaller than the axial spacing S3 between the winding braces 31d and 31a. The variable axial spacing of winding braces 31 counteracts the (otherwise) non-uniform distribution of cooling fluid flow emanating from tube 20 formed between the inner radial edge of the winding braces 31 and the shaft of the rotor 10. The radial discharge flow between each adjacent pair of winding braces 31 may be adjusted by changing the axial separation between those two winding braces 31 to obtain the desired flow of cooling fluid. Moreover, the radial height (e.g., h1–h5) of braces 31 may be adjusted to thus adjust the position of the inner radial edge of each winding brace 31 to throttle the flow of cooling fluid in the downstream tube 20. Accordingly, the axial spacing (e.g., S1–S4) of the winding braces 31 and the radial height (e.g., h1–h5) of winding braces 31 may each be adjusted to provide a more uniform rotor winding temperature. By adjusting the axial spacing and radial height of the winding braces 31, an overall distribution of cooling fluid flow in the rotor 10 and stator 50 that minimizes hot spots in both the stator and rotor windings may be achieved. Ventilation may be provided without introducing stress concentrations in tube 20. The rotor assembly can thus be simplified and the risk of local damage to individual pieces is isolated as opposed to requiring replacement of the entire containment structure.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiment, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3271600 | Philofsky | Sep 1966 | A |
3435263 | Willyoung | Mar 1969 | A |
3439202 | Wanke | Apr 1969 | A |
4278905 | Chari et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4342932 | Glebov et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4363982 | Kaminski | Dec 1982 | A |
4543503 | Kaminski et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4667125 | Kaminski et al. | May 1987 | A |
4709177 | Kaminski | Nov 1987 | A |
4814655 | Kaminski | Mar 1989 | A |
5065064 | Kaminski | Nov 1991 | A |
5281877 | Kazmierczak et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5358432 | Shih et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5886434 | Nygard | Mar 1999 | A |
5929550 | Kaminski et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5986380 | Kaminski et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6081178 | Wang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6169353 | Driscoll et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181228 | Laskaris et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194807 | Kaminski et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198371 | Laskaris et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201462 | Laskaris et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6239527 | Kaminski et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246308 | Laskaris et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6291919 | Ganti et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6313561 | Nygard et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6339268 | Kaminski et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6346753 | Jarczynski et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6369482 | Rink, Jr. et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6415613 | Ackermann et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6437476 | Nygard et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438969 | Laskaris et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442949 | Laskaris et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448686 | Dawson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6495942 | Kaminski et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509664 | Shah et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6794792 | Wang | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6885120 | Kaminski et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
20050073215 | Wang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1124304 | Aug 2001 | EP |
63310367 | Dec 1988 | JP |