The present teachings relate to a prosthesis for replacing and reconstructing a portion of the joint and more specifically to a modular prosthesis.
The shoulder joint is considered to be one of the most complex joints in the body. The scapula, the clavicle and the humerus all meet at the shoulder joint. The head of the humerus fits into a shallow socket of the scapula called the glenoid fossa to form a mobile joint. When the joint is articulated, the humeral head moves in the glenoid fossa to provide a wide range of motion. The shoulder joint may suffer from various maladies including rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, rotator cuff arthroplasty, a vascular necrosis, bone fracture or failure of previous joint implants. If severe joint damage occurs and no other means of treatment is found to be effective, then a total shoulder reconstruction may be necessary.
A shoulder joint prosthesis generally includes the replacement of the ball of the humerus and, optionally, the socket of the shoulder blade with specially designed artificial components. The bio-kinematics, and thus the range of motion in the shoulder vary greatly among prospective patients for reconstruction shoulder surgery. The humeral component typically has a metal shaft or stem with a body portion that is embedded in the resected humerus and a generally hemispherical head portion supported on the stem. The head slidingly engages a glenoid implant on the glenoid fossa. During reconstructive surgery, the components of the prosthesis are matched with the bio-kinematics of the patient in an effort to maintain the natural range of motion of a healthy shoulder joint. Thus, a shoulder prosthesis design must be readily adaptable to a wide range of bio-kinematics for prospective patients.
In this regard, shoulder prostheses are generally available as either unitary structures or modular components. With unitary shoulder prosthesis, a large inventory of differently sized prostheses must be maintained to accommodate the different bone sizes and joint configurations of the prospective patients. With such unitary shoulder prosthesis, the patient is typically evaluated by x-ray to determine the approximate prostheses size needed for reconstruction. A number of differently sized prostheses are selected as possible candidates based upon this preliminary evaluation. Final selection of the appropriately sized prosthesis is made during the surgery. With unitary shoulder prosthesis, each design represents a compromise that is unable to achieve all of the natural range of motion of a healthy shoulder joint because of the fixed geometric configuration in their design.
Modular prostheses systems which reduce the need to maintain large inventories of various sized components are well known in the art. Conventionally, the humeral prosthesis includes two components—a humeral stem component and a spherical head releasably coupled to the stem. Alternately, a three component design is known in which the stem and shoulder are interconnected with an adapter. In either of the two-piece or three-piece designs, a radial offset or angulator inclination of the head relative to the stem is provided in individual components. For example, in the three-piece design, an adapter may be configured with a fixed radial offset of 2 millimeters or an angular inclination of 5 degrees. Different radial offsets or angular inclinations are achieved through the use of different adapters or heads. In this regard, conventional modular shoulder prosthesis kits include multiple redundant components such as adapters and heads to achieve a range of prosthetic options. While providing an advantage over the unitary design in reducing the number of components needed, a rather large inventory of head components and/or adapter components must be maintained to provide the desired range of geometric configurations with the conventional modular shoulder prostheses. Therefore, there is a need for modular shoulder prostheses which are readily adaptable to provide a range of geometric configurations, i.e. radial offsets of angular inclination while minimizing the number of components required.
In accordance with the present teachings, a modular joint prosthesis system is provided. Specifically, a humeral component for a total shoulder prosthesis includes an adapter and a head component which cooperate to provide a range of radial offsets and/or angular inclinations and which are adapted to be used in conjunction with a stem.
In one embodiment, a humeral component for a total shoulder prosthesis is provided for adjustable radial offset of the head with respect to the stem. The shoulder prosthesis includes an adapter interposed between a stem and a head. The adapter is eccentrically coupled to the stem such that relative angular positioning of the adapter on the stem will effect a first adjustment in the radial offset. Likewise, the head component is eccentrically coupled to the adapter as such that relative angular position of the head on the adapter will effect a second radial offset adjustment. By selectively positioning the adapter and the head component with respect to the stem, an infinite adjustment of the radial offset within a given range may be achieved. In one example, indicia are provided at the interface between the adapter and the head to indicate the offset vector (i.e., offset amount and direction).
In another embodiment, a humeral component for a total shoulder prosthesis is provided for adjustable angular inclination of the head component relative to the stem component. The shoulder prosthesis includes an adapter interposed between a stem and a head. The adapter is coupled to the stem in a first angled or non-orthogonal orientation such that relative rotational positioning of the adapter on the stem will effect a first adjustment in the direction of the angular inclination. Likewise, the adapter is coupled to the head in a second angled or non-orthogonal orientation as such that relative rotational position of the head on the adapter will effect a second adjustment in the direction of the angular inclination. By selectively positioning the adapter and the head component with respect to the stem, an infinite adjustment of the angular inclination within a given range may be achieved.
In yet another embodiment, the present teachings include an adapter interposed between a stem and a head. The adapter includes a ball stud having a shank coupled to the stem and a ring coupled to the head. The ring has a spherical bearing surface which cooperates with a ball portion of the ball stud such that an angular adjusted between the ball stud and the ring may be effected. The ring is eccentrically coupled to the head such that relative angular positioning of the ring in the head will effect an adjustment in the radial offset.
The joint prosthesis system of the present teachings provides great flexibility in the adjustment of important bio-kinematic parameters for the prosthesis systems while minimizing the number of components required for the modular system.
Also provided according to the present teachings is a shoulder prosthesis comprising a stem having a first longitudinal axis. The shoulder prosthesis can also include an adaptor including a first taper. The first taper can have a first taper axis. The shoulder prosthesis can also include a plurality of indicia. The shoulder prosthesis can include a head rotatably supported by the adaptor. The head can have a semi-spherical articulating surface. The head can be coupled to the first taper and can be positionable relative to the stem through rotation of the adaptor about the first taper axis for adjusting a radial offset of the head relative to the longitudinal axis of the stem. The plurality of indicia can indicate an alignment of the radial offset.
Further provided is a shoulder prosthesis comprising a stem having a longitudinal axis and a proximal face. The proximal face can define a bore. The shoulder prosthesis can include an adaptor having a first portion coupled to a second portion. At least a portion of the first portion can be received within the bore of the stem to couple the adaptor to the stem. The first portion can also have a first diameter. The second portion can have a second diameter different than the first diameter, and can define a first taper. The adaptor can also include a plurality of indicia. The shoulder prosthesis can include a head having a bottom face opposite a semispherical articulating surface. The bottom face can have a second taper that mates with the first taper of the second portion to couple the head to the adaptor. The rotation of the adaptor relative to the stem can adjust the radial offset of the head relative to the longitudinal axis of the stem. The plurality of indicia on the adaptor can indicate an alignment of the radial offset.
According to the present teachings, provided is a shoulder prosthesis comprising a stem having a longitudinal axis and a proximal face. The proximal face can define a bore. The shoulder prosthesis can include an adaptor having a first portion opposite a second portion. At least a portion of the first portion can be received within the bore of the stem to couple the adaptor to the stem. The first portion can have a first diameter and can be positioned about a first axis. The second portion can have a second diameter smaller than the first diameter. The second portion can define a first taper and can be positioned about a second axis. The second axis can be offset from the first axis. The adaptor can also include a plurality of indicia. The shoulder prosthesis can also include a head having a semispherical articulating surface and a bottom face opposite the semispherical articulating surface. The head can also include a third axis, which can be offset from the first axis and the second axis. The bottom face can have a second taper that mates with the first taper of the second portion to couple the head to the adaptor. The rotation of the adaptor relative to the stem can adjust the radial offset of the head relative to the longitudinal axis of the stem. The plurality of indicia on the adaptor can indicate an alignment of the radial offset.
A femoral prosthesis system according to various embodiments is disclosed. The system can include a femoral head having an articulating surface defining a diameter and a generally opposed surface, a head female taper formed into the femoral head through the opposed surface, wherein a head center axis of the femoral head is offset a first radial distance from a head taper center axis of the head female taper. The system can further include an adapter having a first side and a second generally opposed second side, the adapter further having an outer surface defining an adapter male taper and an adapter female taper formed into the adapter from the first side, wherein the adapter has an adapter center axis offset a radial distance from an adapter female taper axis. The system can also include a femoral stem having a body and a neck, wherein the neck extends at an angle relative to the body and the neck has an outer surface that defines a neck male taper. The femoral head, the adapter, and the neck are selectively connected to achieve a selected femoral head offset relative to the femoral stem.
A femoral prosthesis system according to various embodiments is disclosed. The system can include a femoral head sized and shaped for articulation with at least one of an acetabulum or an acetabular prosthesis. The femoral head can have an articulating surface defining more than a hemisphere and a diameter, an opposite surface generally opposed to the articulating surface, a head female taper formed into the femoral head through the opposite surface, and a head center axis of the femoral head is offset a first radial distance from a head taper center axis of the head female taper, wherein the head center axis is defined through a portion of the articulating surface defining an axis of motion with a pelvis of a patient. The system can further have an adapter having a first side and a second side generally opposed to the first side, the adapter further having an outer surface defining an adapter male taper and an adapter female taper formed into the adapter from the first side, wherein the adapter has an adapter center axis offset a radial distance from an adapter female taper axis. The system can also include a femoral stem having a body and a neck, wherein the neck extends at an angle relative to the body and the neck has an outer surface that defines a neck male taper. The femoral head, the adapter, and the neck can be selectively connected to achieve a selected femoral head offset relative to the femoral stem.
A method of implanting a femoral prosthesis system according to various embodiments is disclosed. The method can include determining an anteversion angle of a femur relative to a pelvis of the patient. The method can also include selecting an adapter having an adapter center axis and an adapter offset connection, wherein the adapter offset connection has an adapter connection center axis and selecting a femoral head having a head center axis and an offset head connection that has a head connection center axis. The selected adapter can be rotated relative to the selected femoral head to achieve a selected offset of the adapter connection center axis relative to the head connection center axis. The selected offset of the adapter connection center axis relative to the head connection center axis can be based on the determined anteversion angle.
Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. It should be understood that the description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present teachings.
The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present teachings in any way.
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present teachings, application, or uses. It should be understood that throughout the drawings, corresponding reference numerals indicate like or corresponding parts and features. Although the following description is related generally to a modular joint prosthesis system which provides adjustment of the radial offset and/or angular inclination of the head relative to the stem, it will be understood that the system as described and claimed herein can be used in any appropriate surgical procedure. Thus, it will be understood that the following discussions are not intended to limit the scope of the present teachings and claims herein.
With reference now to
Adapter 24 is a generally cylindrical disc having a female taper 36 formed therein for receiving male taper 32 of stem 22. The outer surface 38 of adapter 24 defines a male taper. Female taper 36 is eccentrically located in adapter 24 such that central axis 34 of female taper 36 is not collinear with central axis 40 of adapter 24. Instead, central axis 40 is radially offset from central axis 34 by an amount indicated as ra.
Head 26 includes a semispherical surface 42 defined about central axis 44. Bottom face 46 is formed opposite semispherical surface 42 and has a female taper 48 formed therein which is configured to receive adapter 24 along central axis 40. In this regard, female taper 48 is formed eccentrically within head 26 such that a radial offset rb exists between central axis 40 and central axis 44.
As previously described, the eccentric relationship of central axes 34, 40 and 44 provide an arrangement whereby a relative rotational positioning of adapter 24 with respect to head 26 adjusts the radial offset within a given range. As best seen in
With continuing reference to
For example, as shown in
With reference now to
With reference now to
Based on the foregoing detailed description, one skilled in the art will readily recognize that one aspect of the present teachings is directed to an adapter and head having eccentric configurations such that a relative rotation therebetween provides an adjustable range of offset configuration.
With reference now to
With specific reference to
Adapter 124 is a generally cylindrical disc having a female taper 136 formed therein. The outer surface of adapter 124 defines a male taper 138. The central axis 140 of adapter 124 is configured at a first angular orientation with respect to central axis 134. Specifically, central axis 140 is defined by the angle at which female taper 130 is oriented relative to the bottom surface 125 of adapter 124. In one example, central axis 140 is disposed at a +5 degree angular inclination with respect to central axis 134.
Head 126 includes a semispherical surface 142 and a flat bottom face 146 having a female taper 148 formed therein. Female taper 148 defines central axis 144 which is disposed at an angular inclination relative to a central axis 140. Specifically, central axis 144 is defined by the angle at which female taper 144 is oriented relative to bottom face 146. In one example, central axis 144 is disposed at a −5 degree angular inclination with respect to central axis 140.
The relative rotational position of adapter 124 with respect to the head 126 defines the adjustment to the prosthesis inclination relative to central axis 34. For example, as illustrated in
With continuing reference to
With reference now to
With reference now to
From the foregoing description of various embodiments, one skilled in the art will readily recognize that the present teachings are directed to a modular shoulder prosthesis in which the radial offset and/or the angular inclination (i.e. inversion and retroversion) of the head relative to the stem may be adjusted by relative rotational positioning of an adapter interdisposed between the stem and head components of the shoulder prosthesis. In this way, a range of radial offsets and/or angular inclinations may be provided without requiring numerous additional components. The various embodiments have discussed a radial offset adjustment or an angular inclination adjustment independently; however, one skilled in the art will readily recognize that a shoulder prosthesis system may incorporate both aspects of a radial and angular adjustment. Where a single adapter utilized to interconnect the stem and the head, an interrelationship exists between the radially offset adjustment and the angular inclination adjustment. In combination, a system could be employed which utilized two intermediate adapters such that the radial offset and angular inclination adjustment are isolated and thus independent. For example, the interface between a first adapter and a second adapter would provide the desired radial adjustment as described in particular reference to the first embodiment and the interface between the second adapter and the head would provide the angular inclination as described with reference to the second alternative embodiment. In such a system, each of the radial offset and angular inclination adjustments would be provided by a single interface, thereby minimizing the interrelation between both adjustments resulting from a single intermediate adapter.
With reference now to
The adaptor 214 is a generally cylindrical member including an outer ring 228 having a central axis 230 and a ball stud 232 rotatably connected to the ring 228. The ring 228 includes an attachment aperture 234 having a central axis 236 formed therethrough for rotatable engagement with the ball stud 232. The ring 228 further includes an outer surface having a male taper 238 for engagement with the head 216.
The ball stud 232 includes a shank segment 233 for engagement with the bore 224 of the stem 212 and a divided ball segment 240 for attachment to attachment aperture 234 of the ring 228. The ball stud 232 further includes a second bore 242 formed therein for interaction with a fastener 244 for selectively securing the ring 228 to the ball stud 232 in a fixed orientation. Fastener 244 includes a wedge portion 254 and a set screw 256 as best shown in
The head 216 is rotatably supported by the adaptor 214 and includes a semispherical surface 246 defined about a central axis 248 adapted for mating engagement with the glenoid cavity of a scapula. The head 216 further includes a bottom surface 250 formed opposite the semispherical surface 246 having a female taper 252 for mating engagement with the male taper 238 of the ring 228. In this regard, the female taper 252 is received eccentrically within the head 216 such that a radial offset rb exists between the central axis 230 of the ring 228 and the central axis 248 of the head 216. While the present teachings disclose a head 216 for mating engagement with the glenoid cavity of a scapula, it is anticipated that the head 216 could also be received by a prosthetic device replacing a severely damaged glenoid cavity and should be considered within the scope of the present teachings.
As previously described, the eccentric relationship of the central axes 230, 236 and 248 provides an arrangement whereby a relative rotational positioning of the adaptor 214 with respect to the head 216 or a relative rotational positioning of the adaptor 214 with respect to the ball stud 232 or a combination thereof adjusts the radial offset of the head 216 relative to the longitudinal axis A of the stem 212.
With particular reference to
With particular reference to
In addition to providing a radial offset, the shoulder prosthesis 210 further provides an angular adjustment of the head 216 relative to the longitudinal axis A of the stem 212 for both inversion and retroversion adjustments. As best shown in
With continuing reference to
Disclosed above is a prosthesis that can be used in various embodiments to repair a proximal portion of a humerus. The prosthesis, according to various embodiments, can also be used to repair or replace a proximal portion of a femur 522 (
The stem 302 can include a rod portion 310 that is formed to be positioned within a femoral canal that can be reamed or formed within a femur, as illustrated in
The adapter 304 can be formed to include an external surface 330 that defines a male taper. The adapter 304 can also terminate in a surface 332. A central axis 334 can be an axis that is defined through a center of the male taper 330 or the end surface 332. A female taper 340 can also be defined by a depression or bore of the adapter 304. The female taper 340 can define a central axis 342 that is eccentric or offset by a radial offset ra. The radial offset ra can be about 0.1 millimeters (mm) to about 10 mm, and further can be about 0.1 mm to about 5 mm, and can further be about 3 mm to about 5 mm, inclusive. Accordingly, the radial offset ra of the adapter 304 can allow the adapter 304 to have an edge that is positioned a greater distance from the neck 316 that another edge, as discussed further herein.
The adapter 304 can further include a further tapered surface or stem facing taper surface 350 that can assist in providing clearance around the neck 316 relative to the femoral stem 302. Additionally, depressions, such as a depression 352 can assist in inserting or engaging the adapter 304 into the head 306. It will be further understood, however, that the adapter 304 can include a threaded aperture similar to the threaded aperture 66 discussed above for removal of the adapter 304 from the head 306.
The femoral head 306 can be formed to have an exterior articulating surface 360 that is substantially smooth or otherwise provided to articulate with a portion of either an acetabular prosthesis or a natural acetabulum of a patient. The exterior surface 360 of the femoral head 306 can define any selected portion of a sphere. For example, the exterior surface 360 can define a hemisphere or more than a hemisphere. The femoral head 306 can also include a stem facing surface 362 into which the articulating surface 360 terminate. The stem facing surface 360 can be substantially flat or in an appropriate configuration to allow for clearance of the anatomy relative to the femoral head 306.
Formed into the femoral head 306 through the stem facing surface 362 can be a female taper 364. The female taper 364 can define a taper axis 366 that is generally defined through a center of the female taper 364. The femoral head 306 can define a head middle axis 368 that is generally defined through a center of the femoral head 306. The taper axis 366 and the head axis 368 can be offset from one another radially by a radial offset rb. The head radial offset rb can be any appropriate offset, such as within the range discussed above. For example, the head radial offset rb can be about 0.1 mm to about 10 mm, further can be about 0.1 mm to about 5 mm, and can further be about 3 mm to about 5 mm, inclusive. Accordingly, the femoral head 306 can include an external edge or surface that extends beyond or is positioned away from a portion of the neck 316 in a first direction and a lesser distance away from the neck 316 in another direction.
As discussed above and further herein, the male taper 318, the female taper 340, the male taper 330, and the female taper 364, can be formed of any appropriate taper dimension. For example, a morse type taper or other self locking taper configurations can be provided. Self locking tapers generally have complimentary angles of about 3-5 degrees. Accordingly, the male taper can have an external taper angle of about 3-5 degrees from a central axis while the female taper can have an internal complimentary taper of about 3-5 degrees central axis of the female taper. The taper dimensions can allow for a sufficiently locking configuration or fixed configuration between the female and female tapers when interconnected.
The femoral head 306 can be generally spherical and include a center 380 where a radius extends from the center 380 to the surface 360 of the femoral head 306. The radius 382 can be any appropriate size, such as about 10 millimeters (mm) to about 50 mm, including about 10 mm to about 35 mm, and further including about 11 to about 11 mm. The femoral head 306 can define a portion of a sphere generally to the flat or rear side 362. The portion of the sphere defined by the femoral head 306 can be an appropriate mount such as about 50% to about 95%, about 55% to about 90%, and further including about 60% to about 80%. Accordingly, the femoral head 306 can define more than a hemisphere of a sphere. The articulating surface 360 can be provided to articulate for a selected range of motion with the acetabular prosthesis or acetabulum of the patient with a greater portion of the sphere defined by the femoral head 306.
With reference to
It is further understood that the male and female tapers in the respective femoral head 306 and adapter 304 can be reversed. Similarly, the male taper 318 of the neck 316 and the female taper 340 of the adapter can be reversed. Thus, although respective axes of the male and female tapers can be maintained at radial offset positions, as discussed above, the taper connections can be reversed in selected embodiments.
The female taper 340 can be offset from the center axis 366, as illustrated in
The ellipsis 400 can be similar to the ellipsis 52 discussed above relative to the prosthesis 26. Accordingly, the center 342 of the female taper 340 of the adapter 304 can be moved relative to the center 366 of the femoral head 306. The amount of offset from the center 366 of the femoral head 306 can be defined by the amount of rotation of the adapter 304 relative to the femoral head 306. The amount of rotation can be indicated by a first marking 402 on the adapter 304 and one or more markings 404 positioned on the stem facing side 362 of the femoral head 306. The adapter marking 402 can be similar to the markings 62 discussed in
As discussed further herein, the radial offset rb of the femoral head 306 and the radial offset ra of the adapter 304 can be used to compensate for or achieve a selected amount of anteversion or angle offset required due to acetabular prosthesis placement in or natural acetabular anatomy of a patient. For example, an anteversion of a patient can be about five degrees to about 10 degrees. A prosthesis, however, positioned within a femur is positioned at a selected orientation and must articulate with the acetabulum or an acetabular prosthesis in an appropriate manner. If a femoral prosthesis is positioned within the femur at an orientation that does not allow for an achievement of a selected anteversion, the adapter 304 can be rotated to a selected position relative to the femoral head 306 to allow for the femoral head 306 to be positioned at a selected orientation relative to the remaining anatomy of the patient when connected to the neck 316. The head 306 and adapter 304 can, therefore, achieve a range of offset angles between the femur and the pelvis. Accordingly, the adapter 304 and the femoral head 306 can be provided to minimize inventory of selected femoral heads, femoral stem prosthesis to be positioned of the femur. Also, the range of offsets can allow for a selected orientation of the femoral prosthesis to be placed in the femur bone of the patient to maintain a selected bone mass relative to the femoral prosthesis. Moreover, an offset can be selected to compensate for less than optimal femural stem 302 placement or acetabular prosthesis placement.
With continuing reference to
As illustrated in
Regardless, as illustrated in
By rotating the adapter 304, relative to the femoral head 306, an offset of about, nearly, or exactly zero can also be achieved when the center of the femoral head 368 and the center of the female taper 342 are substantially aligned, as illustrated in
As discussed above, by rotating the adapter 304 relative to the femoral head 306, the selected offset can be achieved between the maximum “UP” offset 410, as illustrated in
With reference to
The femoral prosthesis 450 further includes an adapter 464. The adapter 464 can define an exterior surface or male taper 466. Additionally, the adapter 464 defines an attachment aperture 468 for rotatable engagement with the ball stud 462. The ball stud 462 includes a divided ball segment 470 through which a fastener 472 can engage an internal bore 474. The fastener 472 first passes through a wedge 476 and fixes the wedge 476 within the divided ball portion 470 once the divided ball portion 470 is in the attachment aperture 468. Accordingly, the wedge 476 can wedge the divided ball portion 470 to engage the attachment aperture 468 and the fastener 472 can hold the wedge relative to the divided ball portion 470 within the adapter 464. Accordingly, the adapter 464 can be fixed relative to the neck 456. The divided ball portion 470 can also be made as one piece with the neck 456.
A femoral head 480 can include an articulation surface 482 similar to the articulation surface of the femoral head 306 discussed above. Additionally, the femoral head 480 can include a stem facing surface 484 into which a female taper 486 is defined. Thus, the articulation surface 482 of the head 480 can define more than a hemisphere or selected portion of a sphere, as discussed above. For example, the articulation surface 482 can be about 55% to about 95% of a sphere, including about 60% to about 80%, inclusive.
The femoral head 480 can define a central axis 490. Additionally, the adapter 464 defines an adapter central axis 492 and an aperture central axis 494 is defined through the adapter and the attachment aperture 468. The central axis 494 through the attachment aperture 468 is eccentric or readily offset by a distance ra from the central axis 492 of the adapter 464. Additionally, a center axis 496 through the taper 486 in the femoral head 480 can be defined. Accordingly, a radial offset of rb between the center axes of the head 490 in the center axis of the taper 486 can be formed. In this manner, the center axis 492 of the adapter 464 can be positioned substantially in the center or aligned with the center axis 496 of the taper 486, but is offset by the radial distance rb from the center of the head axis 490. As discussed above, in relation to
With reference to
In implanting and preparing to implant the variable prosthesis, such as the variable femoral prosthesis 300, a surgeon can determine a desired offset, including at least one of an anteversion angle, a retroversion angle, a varus angle, or a valgus angle. In one example, the surgeon can review image data or visually inspect and manually measure the patient to determine a selected or optimal offset. The head, adapter, and stem can then be properly rotated to achieve the selected offset and the variable prosthesis can be implanted. In various embodiments, the surgeon may also re-measure, initially measure, or visually inspect the patient after preparing or implanting at least one of the stem 302 or the acetabular prosthesis 522 to determine an optimal angle or offset. Again, the head, adapter, and stem can then be properly rotated to achieve the selected offset and the variable prosthesis can be implanted based on the measurement and/or determination after preparing or implanting at least one of the stem 302 or the acetabular prosthesis 522. Thus, the determination of the appropriate offset can be made and the appropriate position of the head and adapter can be made at a selected appropriate time.
As an example, an illustrated in
As illustrated, therefore, positions of the taper 304 and the femoral head 306 relative to the femoral stem 302 allows for movement of the femoral head 306 relative to the femoral stem 302. The adapter 304 can be rotated around within the femoral head 306 in substantially 360 degrees. Accordingly, movement of the femoral adapter 304 relative to the femoral head 306 and the stem 302 can form or move the head 306 in a varus direction 550 or a valgus direction 552, as illustrated in
In a selected orientation, the femoral head can be aligned with an axis through a trunion 554 or neck of the femoral stem 302, such that the femoral head 306 can include the central axis that is substantially aligned with the axis of the trunion 554. In a selected orientation, however, the rotation of the adapter 304 and/or the femoral head 306 can move the femoral head 306 to a varus direction 550, as illustrated by phantom head position 550a. Alternatively, the adapter 304 and/or the femoral head 306 can be rotated to move the femoral head 306 in a valgus direction 552, as illustrated in phantom head position 552a. The varus and valgus directions, 550, 552, respectively, can be achieved within the anatomy of the patient.
In addition, due to rotation of the femoral head 306 and/or the femoral adapter 304, the femoral head 306 can also be moved in an anteversion direction 560 or in a retroversion direction 562, as illustrated in
Accordingly, movement of the femoral head 306 in any one of the varus directions, valgus direction, anteversion direction, or retroversion direction can be substantially relative to the patient. The rotation of the femoral head 306 and/or the adapter 304 relative to the stem 302 positioned in the femur 524, however, can achieve the various directions relative to the pelvis 520 to achieve a selected position of the femur 524 relative to the pelvis 520. Thus, the combination of the head 306 and the adapter 304 can achieve various and selection offsets of the head 306 relative to the stem 302.
It is understood that the implantation of the femoral prosthesis, according to various embodiments, can be achieved with generally known surgical techniques. Generally, access can be achieved to the femoral joint and either or both of the femur 524 and the pelvis 520 can be prepared for implantation for selected prostheses. The variable prosthesis as discussed herein, however, can allow for a physician or surgeon to implant a prosthesis with an appropriate offset, as discussed above, even after preparing the acetabulum and the femur to maintain a selected amount of bone after implantation or based upon an anatomy or bone structure of a patient. For example, achieving a position of a fixed or non-variable prosthesis relative to a patient may be difficult if a bone structure or anatomy does not allow for extensive reaming or preparation for various prostheses. Nevertheless, the prosthetic devices can be specifically designed for selected patients, but a variable prosthesis can minimize selection and minimize inventory at a selected implantation facility therefore allowing greater variability with a single prosthetic device for multiple patients.
In reference to all of the above-described embodiments, various tapered surfaces have been referenced at interfaces between the stem, adapter and head. In one example, these tapered surfaces are configured as self locking tapers, such as morse-type tapers which provide a self locking interface. Locking tapers can include complementary angles of about 3 degrees to about 5 degrees, inclusive. While morse-type tapers are described herein, one skilled in the art will readily recognize that other means may be incorporated for providing a locking interface between the various components of the prosthesis system. In this regard, one or more interfaces may be interlocked with the use of an additional fastener to insure locking engagement therebetween.
Moreover, the various components can be formed with generally known techniques. For example, the heads, adapters and stems can be formed with various forging or casting techniques and selected finishing procedures can be applied to their respective surfaces. The tapers can also be formed in the various components with selected milling techniques or can be formed with casting and forging techniques.
While specific examples have been described in the specification and illustrated in the drawings, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes can be made and equivalents can be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the present teachings. Furthermore, the mixing and matching of features, elements and/or functions between various examples is expressly contemplated herein so that one of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate from the present teachings that features, elements and/or functions of one example can be incorporated into another example as appropriate, unless described otherwise, above. Moreover, many modifications can be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the present teachings without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the present teachings not be limited to the particular examples illustrated by the drawings and described in the specification, but that the scope of the present teachings will include any embodiments falling within the foregoing description.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/309,973 filed Dec. 2, 2011. The entire disclosure of the above application is incorporated hereby by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3815157 | Skorecki et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3842442 | Kolbel et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3916451 | Buechel et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3978528 | Crep | Sep 1976 | A |
3979778 | Stroot | Sep 1976 | A |
4003095 | Gristina | Jan 1977 | A |
4030143 | Elloy et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4040131 | Gristina | Aug 1977 | A |
4135517 | Reale | Jan 1979 | A |
4179758 | Gristina | Dec 1979 | A |
4206517 | Pappas et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4693723 | Gabard et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4822370 | Schelhas | Apr 1989 | A |
4865605 | Dines et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4865609 | Roche | Sep 1989 | A |
4919670 | Dale et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4957510 | Cremascoli | Sep 1990 | A |
4963155 | Lazzeri et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5080673 | Burkhead et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5080685 | Bolesky et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5135529 | Paxson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5181928 | Bolesky et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5201882 | Paxson | Apr 1993 | A |
5222984 | Forte | Jun 1993 | A |
5314479 | Rockwood, Jr. et al. | May 1994 | A |
5358526 | Tornier | Oct 1994 | A |
5462563 | Shearer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5507817 | Craig et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507818 | McLaughlin | Apr 1996 | A |
5507824 | Lennox | Apr 1996 | A |
5549682 | Roy | Aug 1996 | A |
5580352 | Sekel | Dec 1996 | A |
5702457 | Walch et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702486 | Craig et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5723018 | Cyprien et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728161 | Camino et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5776194 | Mikol et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5902340 | White et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910171 | Kummer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5961555 | Huebner | Oct 1999 | A |
6033439 | Camino et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045582 | Prybyla | Apr 2000 | A |
6102953 | Huebner | Aug 2000 | A |
6129764 | Servidio | Oct 2000 | A |
6171341 | Boileau et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6197062 | Fenlin | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6197063 | Dews | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206925 | Tornier | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6228120 | Leonard et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6364910 | Shultz et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368352 | Camino et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6530957 | Jack | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6620197 | Maroney et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626946 | Walch et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6719799 | Kropf et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6736852 | Callaway et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6749637 | Bahler | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6761740 | Tornier et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6790234 | Frankle | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6890358 | Ball et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6942699 | Stone et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6974483 | Murray | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6986790 | Ball et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7022141 | Dwyer et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7097663 | Nicol et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7108719 | Horber | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7135044 | Bassik et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7175663 | Stone | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7189261 | Dews et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7238207 | Blatter et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7303585 | Horber | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7819923 | Stone et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7998217 | Brown | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8052758 | Winslow | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8088169 | Dorr et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8142512 | Brooks et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8157866 | Winslow et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
RE43482 | Mikol et al. | Jun 2012 | E |
8236059 | Stone et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8303665 | Tornier et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8317871 | Stone et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
20010049561 | Dews et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053935 | Hartdegen et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020120339 | Callaway et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138148 | Hyde | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020156534 | Grusin et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030028253 | Stone et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030074079 | McTighe et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097183 | Rauscher et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114933 | Bouttens et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030158605 | Tornier | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040064189 | Maroney et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064190 | Ball et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040138757 | Nadzadi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040220673 | Pria | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040220674 | Pria | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050096745 | Andre et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050197708 | Stone et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060020344 | Shultz et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060106463 | Bigsby et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070005145 | Banks et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043446 | Murray | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043448 | Murray | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070142918 | Stone | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070198094 | Berelsman et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219641 | Dorr et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080234830 | Hershberger et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090192621 | Winslow et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090210065 | Nerot et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090270993 | Maisonneuve et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100100193 | White | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100152860 | Brooks et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168865 | Birkbeck et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179664 | Brooks et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110035013 | Winslow et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110035015 | Stone et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054624 | Iannotti | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110118846 | Katrana et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120065737 | Chow | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120078375 | Smith et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19509037 | Sep 1996 | DE |
0257359 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0599429 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0664108 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0679375 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0712617 | May 1996 | EP |
0797964 | Oct 1997 | EP |
1472999 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1520560 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1639965 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2574283 | Jun 1986 | FR |
2652498 | Apr 1991 | FR |
2664809 | Jan 1992 | FR |
2704747 | Nov 1994 | FR |
2721200 | Dec 1995 | FR |
2848099 | Jun 2004 | FR |
2852229 | Sep 2004 | FR |
2405346 | Mar 2005 | GB |
WO-9522302 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO-9617553 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO-9846172 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO-0015154 | Mar 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Buechel-Pappas.TM. Total Shoulder System”, Endotec, Jul. 1991. |
“Delta Prothese Totale D'epaule Inversee”, Depuy (8 sheets). |
“Delta Prothese Totale D'epaule Inversee”, Depuy 2005 (8 sheets). |
“Magnum™ , M2a-Magnum™ Operative Technique,” brochure. Biomet UK Ltd. (2008) pp. 1-14. |
“Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis”, Encore Surgical (2 sheets). |
“Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis”, Encore Surgical, 2004 (2 sheets). |
European Search Report for EP06254735 mailed Apr. 5, 2007. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/234,743 mailed Jun. 15, 2010. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,238 mailed Dec. 1, 2011. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,079 mailed Oct. 31, 2013. |
International Search Report for PCT/US02/22040 mailed Apr. 4, 2003. |
M2a-Magnum™, “Large Metal Articulation,” brochure. Biomet (2001), 8 sheets. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/234,743 mailed Dec. 2, 2009. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/234,743 mailed Dec. 21, 2010. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,238 mailed Jul. 1, 2011. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/390,652 mailed Feb. 28, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/309,973 mailed Dec. 6, 2013 (for which the present application claims the benefit of priority). |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,079 mailed Mar. 21, 2014. |
Surgery Eases Rotator Cuff Pain by Ruth Campbell Odessa American, online article, (2 sheets) dated Feb. 9, 2005. |
Thabe et al., “Die endoprothetische Versorgung des rheumatischen Schultergelenkes”, Aktuelle Rheumatologie, vol. 19 (1994), pp. 155-160 (with English abstract). |
Thabe et al., “Modulares—Vario—Schulter”, 1999, 6 sheets of pictures. |
Thabe et al., “Modulares—Vario—Schulter”, 6 sheets of pictures. |
The Delta CTA™ Reverse Shoulder System, copyright Johnson & Johnson Gateway LLC 2000-2005 online article (2 sheets) dated Feb. 9, 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140236309 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13309973 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 14257526 | US |