Variable radius taper x-ray window support structure

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9076628
  • Patent Number
    9,076,628
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, November 7, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 7, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A support structure for an x-ray window comprising a support frame defining a perimeter and an aperture, a plurality of ribs extending across the aperture of the support frame and carried by the support frame, and openings between the plurality of ribs. A rib taper region can extend from a central portion of the ribs to the support frame. The taper region can include a non-circular, arcuate pair of fillets on opposing sides of the ribs and an increasing of rib width from the central portion to the support frame.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present application is related generally to x-ray window support structures.


BACKGROUND

It is important for support members in support structures, such as x-ray window support structures, to be strong but also small in size. X-ray windows can include a thin film supported by the support structure, typically comprised of ribs supported by a frame. The support structure can be used to minimize sagging or breaking of the thin film. The support structure can interfere with the passage of x-rays and thus it can be desirable for ribs to be as thin or narrow as possible while still maintaining sufficient strength to support the thin film. The support structure and film are normally expected to be strong enough to withstand a differential pressure of around 1 atmosphere without sagging or breaking.


Such support structures can comprise a support frame defining a perimeter and an aperture, a plurality of ribs extending across the aperture of the support frame and carried by the support frame, and openings between the ribs. Stresses can occur at the junction of the ribs and the support frame. It can be important to reduce such stresses in order to avoid failure at this junction.


SUMMARY

It has been recognized that it would be advantageous to have a strong x-ray window support structure, and advantageous to minimize stresses at a junction of the ribs to the support frame. The present invention is directed to an x-ray window support structure that satisfies these needs. The support structure comprises a support frame defining a perimeter and an aperture, a plurality of ribs extending across the aperture of the support frame and carried by the support frame, and openings between the plurality of ribs. A rib taper region can extend from a central portion of the ribs to the support frame. The taper region can include a non-circular, arcuate pair of fillets on opposing sides of the ribs and an increasing of rib width from the central portion to the support frame.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic top view of an x-ray window support structure, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of an x-ray window, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a schematic top view of a portion of an x-ray window support structure, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a schematic top view of a portion of an x-ray window support structure, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a schematic top view of a portion of an x-ray window support structure, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6 is a schematic top view of a portion of an x-ray window support structure, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 7 is a schematic top view of a portion of an x-ray window support structure, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





DEFINITIONS





    • As used herein, the term “carbon fiber” or “carbon fibers” means solid, substantially cylindrically shaped structures having a mass fraction of at least 85% carbon, a length of at least 5 micrometers and a diameter of at least 1 micrometer.

    • As used herein, the term “directionally aligned,” in referring to alignment of carbon fibers with ribs, means that the carbon fibers are substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the ribs and does not require the carbon fibers to be exactly aligned with a longitudinal axis of the ribs.

    • As used herein, the term “rib” means a support member and can extend, linearly or with bends or curves, by itself or coupled with other ribs, across an aperture of a support frame.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As illustrated in FIG. 1, a support structure 10 for an x-ray window is shown comprising a support frame 11 defining a perimeter 11p and an aperture 11a, a plurality of ribs 12 extending across the aperture 11a of the support frame 11 and carried by the support frame 11, and openings 13 between the plurality of ribs 12. The ribs 12 can be attached or joined to the support frame 11 at a junction 14. Typically, the ribs 12 and support frame 11 are formed integrally from a single wafer or sheet of material, but they can be formed separately and attached together, such as with an adhesive.


Shown in FIG. 2 is an x-ray window 20 having tops of the ribs 12 terminating substantially in a common plane 16. A thin film 21 can be disposed over and can be attached to the ribs 12 and the support frame 11.


When the thickness t of the ribs 12 is sufficiently thin, stress on the rib material can become very large near the junction 14 of the ribs 12 with the support frame 11. A rib taper region 12t (shown in FIG. 1) may be used to reduce stress at this junction 14.


Shown in FIG. 3 is a section of a support structure 30. A rib taper region 12t can extend from a central portion 12c of the ribs 12 to the support frame 11. The rib taper region 12t can include a non-circular, arcuate pair of fillets 33a- and 33b on opposing sides of the ribs 12. Non-circular, arcuate fillets 33a and 33b can allow for reduced stress, while also allowing ribs 12 to be spaced closer together. The rib taper region 12t can include an increasing of rib width W from the central portion 12c to the support frame 11 (WJ>Wc). Rib width W can continuously and smoothly increase, with no sharp angles or inflection points, from the central portion 12c to the support frame 11.


The support structures 30 and 40 described herein may be further defined or quantified by the shape of the ribs 12, such as having a long length relative to an increase in rib width W in the rib taper region 12t. The support structures 30 and 40 described herein may also be defined or quantified by the shape of the openings 13 in the rib taper region 12t, such as a relationship of rib length in the rib taper region 12t to an opening width, a relationship of radius of curvature at a taper beginning to a radius of curvature at the support frame 11, or elliptical shaped openings 13. These definitions can be used to quantify the non-circular, arcuate shape of the fillets 33a- and 33b of the rib taper region 12t.


As shown on support structures 30 and 40 in FIGS. 3-4, a location where the central portion 12c of the ribs 12 meets the rib taper region 12t defines a taper beginning Tb; a rib width at the taper beginning Tb defines a central rib width Wc; a rib width at a junction 14 of the rib 12 with the support frame 11 defines a junction rib width WJ; and a straight line distance, parallel with a center of the rib 12, from the taper beginning Tb to the support frame 11 defines a taper length TL. In one aspect, the central rib width Wc, the junction rib width WJ, and the taper length TL can satisfy the equation:






1
<


T
L



W
J

-

W
c



<
3.





In another aspect, the central rib width Wc, the junction rib width WJ, and the taper length TL can satisfy the equation:






1.4
<


T
L



W
J

-

W





c




<

2.2
.






These equations can quantify a long length of the ribs 12 relative to an increase in rib width W in the rib taper region 12t.


As shown on support structure 40 of FIG. 4, an opening 13 width at the taper beginning Tb defines a taper opening width Ow. The taper length TL divided by the taper opening width Ow can be between 1 and 3






(

1
<


T
L


O
w


<
3

)





in one aspect, or between 1.4 and 2.2






(

1.4
<


T
L


O
w


<
2.2

)





in another aspect. These equations can quantify a long length of the ribs 12 in the rib taper region 12t relative to an opening width Ow at the taper beginning Tb.


As shown on support structure 50 of FIG. 5, a radius of curvature of the fillets 33a and 33b at the taper beginning Tb defines a central radius Rc and a radius of curvature of the fillets 33a and 33b at a junction 14 of the ribs 12 with the support frame 11 defines a junction radius RJ. The central radius Rc divided by the junction radius RJ can be between 10 and 100






(

10
<


R
c


R
J


<
100

)





in one aspect. The central radius Rc divided by the junction radius RJ can be between 20 and 50






(

20
<


R
c


R
J


<
50

)





in another aspect. These equations can quantify a large radius of curvature at the taper beginning Tb relative to a substantially smaller radius of curvature at a junction 14 of the ribs 12 with the support frame 11, thus quantifying the non-circular, arcuate shape of the ribs 12.


The larger radius of curvature closer to the central portion 12c of the ribs 12 can result in reduced stress in the ribs 12, and thus greater rib strength and reduced risk of rib failure. The gradually and continually decreasing radius of curvature towards the junction 14 can allow ribs 12 to be packed closer together. Thus, if a larger spacing between ribs 12 is allowed, such as if a relatively strong film 21 is used, then the central radius Rc divided by the junction radius RJ can be relatively smaller. If a smaller spacing between ribs 12 is allowed, such as if a thinner or relatively weaker film 21 is used, then the central radius Rc divided by the junction radius RJ may need to be larger.


As shown on support structure 60 of FIG. 6, openings 13 can have a half-elliptical shape 61 between ribs 12 in the rib taper region 12t. Eccentricity e of the half-elliptical shape 61 can be between 0.90 and 0.99 (0.90<e<0.99) in one aspect, between 0.80 and 0.99 (0.80<e<0.99) in another aspect, between 0.93 and 0.98 (0.93<e<0.98) in another aspect, or between 0.75 and 0.90 (0.75<e<0.90) in another aspect. Eccentricity e is defined as:






=



1
-


b
2


a
2




.






These equations can quantify the shape of openings 13 in the rib taper region 12t.


In previous figures, ribs 12 were shown packed closely together, such that where the rib taper for one rib 12 ended at the support structure 11, a rib taper for another rib 12 began. As shown on support structure 70 of FIG. 7, ribs 12 can be spaced farther apart, such that there is a region of an inner perimeter 71 of the support structure 70 in which there are no ribs 12, and no beginning of taper of ribs 12.


The central portion 12c of the ribs 12 can have a substantially constant width W, and ribs 12 can be substantially parallel with each other, as is shown on support structure 10 in FIG. 1. A variable rib width W in the central portion 12c, or non-parallel ribs, such as hexagonal or intersecting ribs, are also within the scope of this invention.


The ribs 12 and/or the support frame 11 can comprise low atomic number elements such as aluminum, beryllium, boron, carbon, fluorine, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, and/or silicon. Use of such low atomic number elements can result in minimized x-ray spectrum contamination. The ribs 12 and/or the support frame 11 can comprise boron carbide, boron hydride, boron nitride, carbon fiber composite, carbon nanotube composite, kevlar, mylar, polyimide, polymer, silicon nitride, diamond, diamond-like carbon, graphitic carbon, pyrolytic graphite, and/or amorphous carbon. The openings 13, ribs 12, and support frame 11 can be formed by laser ablation. Manufacturing of the support structure from a carbon composite wafer is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/667,273, filed on Nov. 2, 2012, and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/453,066, filed on Apr. 23, 2012, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. If a carbon composite support structure is used, carbon fibers in the carbon composite can be directionally aligned with the ribs 12.


The film 21, described previously in the description of FIG. 2, can be configured to pass radiation therethrough. For example, the film 21 can be made of a material that has a low atomic number and can be thin, such as for example about 5 to 500 micrometers (μm). The film 21 can have sufficient strength to allow differential pressure of at least one atmosphere without breaking. The film 21 can be hermetic or air-tight. The film 21 can combine with one of the support structures described herein and a shell to form a hermetic enclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A support structure for an x-ray window, the support structure comprising: a) a support frame defining a perimeter and an aperture;b) a plurality of ribs extending across the aperture of the support frame and carried by the support frame;c) the support frame and the plurality of ribs comprising a carbon composite material including carbon fibers embedded in a matrix;d) the plurality of ribs forming openings between the plurality of ribs;e) a rib taper region extending from a central portion of each of the plurality of ribs to the support frame;f) the rib taper region including a non-circular, arcuate pair of fillets on opposing sides of each of the plurality of ribs; andg) the rib taper region including an increasing of rib width from the central portion to the support frame.
  • 2. The support structure of claim 1, wherein: a) a location where the central portion of each of the plurality of ribs meets the rib taper region defines a taper beginning;b) a radius of curvature of the pair of fillets at the taper beginning defines a central radius;c) a radius of curvature of the pair of fillets at a junction of each of the plurality of ribs with the support frame defines a junction radius; andd) the central radius divided by the junction radius is between 10 and 100.
  • 3. The support structure of claim 1, wherein openings at the rib taper region have a half-elliptical shape.
  • 4. The support structure of claim 3, wherein the half-elliptical shape has an eccentricity of between 0.90 and 0.99.
  • 5. The support structure of claim 3, wherein the half-elliptical shape has an eccentricity of between 0.80 and 0.99.
  • 6. The support structure of claim 1, wherein: a) a location where the central portion of each of the plurality of ribs meets the rib taper region defines a taper beginning;b) a straight line distance, parallel with a center of each of the plurality of ribs, from the taper beginning to the support frame defines a taper length;c) an opening width at the taper beginning defines a taper opening width; andd) the taper length divided by the taper opening width is between 1 and 3.
  • 7. The support structure of claim 6, wherein the taper length divided by the taper opening width is between 1.4 and 2.2.
  • 8. The support structure of claim 1, wherein: a) a location where the central portion of each of the plurality of ribs meets the rib taper region defines a taper beginning;b) a rib width at the taper beginning defines a central rib width;c) a rib width at a junction of each of the plurality of ribs with the support frame defines a junction rib width;d) a straight line distance, parallel with a center of each of the plurality of ribs, from the taper beginning to the support frame defines a taper length; ande) the central rib width, the junction rib width, and the taper length satisfy the equation:
  • 9. The support structure of claim 8, wherein the central rib width, the junction rib width, and the taper length satisfy the equation:
  • 10. The support structure of claim 1, wherein tops of the plurality of ribs terminate substantially in a common plane, and further comprising a film disposed over, carried by, and spanning the plurality of ribs and disposed over and spanning the openings, and configured to pass radiation therethrough.
  • 11. The support structure of claim 1, wherein the openings, the plurality of ribs, and the support frame were formed by laser ablation of a carbon composite wafer, and carbon fibers in the carbon composite are substantially aligned with the plurality of ribs.
  • 12. The support structure of claim 1, wherein the central portion of each of the plurality of ribs has a substantially constant width.
  • 13. A support structure for an x-ray window, the support structure comprising: a) a support frame defining a perimeter and an aperture;b) a plurality of ribs extending across the aperture of the support frame and carried by the support frame;c) the plurality of ribs forming openings between the plurality of ribs;d) a rib taper region extending from a central portion of each of the plurality of ribs to the support frame;e) the rib taper region including a non-circular, arcuate pair of fillets on opposing sides of each of the plurality of ribs;f) the pair of fillets include a larger radius of curvature closer to the central portion of the ribs and a smaller radius of curvature towards the support frame; andg) the rib taper region including an increasing of rib width from the central portion to the support frame.
  • 14. The support structure of claim 13, wherein the plurality of ribs comprise carbon, carbon fiber composite, silicon, boron carbide, or combinations thereof.
  • 15. The support structure of claim 13, wherein: a) the support frame and the plurality of ribs comprise a carbon composite material including carbon fibers embedded in a matrix; andb) the openings, the plurality of ribs, and the support frame were integrally formed by laser ablation of a carbon composite wafer.
  • 16. The support structure of claim 13, wherein: a) a location where the central portion of each of the plurality of ribs meets the rib taper region defines a taper beginning;b) a radius of curvature of the pair of fillets at the taper beginning defines a central radius;c) a radius of curvature of the pair of fillets at a junction of each of the plurality of ribs with the support frame defines a junction radius; andd) the central radius divided by the junction radius is between 10 and 100.
  • 17. The support structure of claim 13, wherein openings at the rib taper region have a half-elliptical shape having an eccentricity of between 0.80 and 0.99.
  • 18. The support structure of claim 13, wherein: a) a location where the central portion of each of the plurality of ribs meets the rib taper region defines a taper beginning;b) a rib width at the taper beginning defines a central rib width;c) a rib width at a junction of each of the plurality of ribs with the support frame defines a junction rib width;d) a straight line distance, parallel with a center of each of the plurality of ribs, from the taper beginning to the support frame defines a taper length; ande) the central rib width, the junction rib width, and the taper length satisfy the equation:
  • 19. A support structure for an x-ray window, the support structure comprising: a) a support frame defining a perimeter and an aperture;b) a plurality of ribs extending across the aperture of the support frame and carried by the support frame;c) tops of the plurality of ribs terminate in a common plane;d) the plurality of ribs forming openings between the plurality of ribs;e) a rib taper region extending from a central portion of each of the plurality of ribs to the support frame;f) the rib taper region including a non-circular, arcuate pair of fillets on opposing sides of each of the plurality of ribs;g) the rib taper region including an increasing of rib width from the central portion to the support frame;h) the openings at the rib taper region have a half-elliptical shape having an eccentricity of between 0.80 and 0.99; andi) the plurality of ribs comprise carbon, carbon fiber composite, silicon, boron carbide, or combinations thereof.
  • 20. The support structure of claim 19, wherein the openings and the plurality of ribs were formed by laser ablation.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

Priority is claimed to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/689,458, filed on Jun. 6, 2012; which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/667,273, filed on Nov. 2, 2012, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/453,066, filed on Apr. 23, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,989,354, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/486,547 filed on May 16, 2011, 61/495,616 filed on Jun. 10, 2011, and 61/511,793 filed on Jul. 26, 2011; all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (229)
Number Name Date Kind
1276706 Snook et al. May 1918 A
1881448 Forde et al. Oct 1932 A
1946288 Kearsley Feb 1934 A
2291948 Cassen Aug 1942 A
2316214 Atlee et al. Apr 1943 A
2329318 Atlee et al. Sep 1943 A
2340363 Atlee et al. Feb 1944 A
2502070 Atlee et al. Mar 1950 A
2663812 Jamison et al. Mar 1950 A
2683223 Hosemann Jul 1954 A
2952790 Steen Sep 1960 A
3397337 Denholm Aug 1968 A
3538368 Oess Nov 1970 A
3665236 Gaines et al. May 1972 A
3679927 Kirkendall Jul 1972 A
3691417 Gralenski Sep 1972 A
3741797 Chavasse Jr. et al. Jun 1973 A
3751701 Gralenski et al. Aug 1973 A
3801847 Dietz Apr 1974 A
3828190 Dahlin et al. Aug 1974 A
3882339 Rate et al. May 1975 A
3962583 Holland et al. Jun 1976 A
3970884 Golden Jul 1976 A
4007375 Albert Feb 1977 A
4075526 Grubis Feb 1978 A
4160311 Ronde et al. Jul 1979 A
4163900 Warren et al. Aug 1979 A
4178509 More et al. Dec 1979 A
4184097 Auge Jan 1980 A
4250127 Warren et al. Feb 1981 A
4368538 McCorkle Jan 1983 A
4393127 Greschner et al. Jul 1983 A
4463257 Simpkins et al. Jul 1984 A
4463338 Utner et al. Jul 1984 A
4521902 Peugeot Jun 1985 A
4532150 Endo et al. Jul 1985 A
4573186 Reinhold Feb 1986 A
4576679 White Mar 1986 A
4584056 Perret et al. Apr 1986 A
4591756 Avnery May 1986 A
4608326 Neukermans et al. Aug 1986 A
4645977 Kurokawa et al. Feb 1987 A
4675525 Amingual et al. Jun 1987 A
4679219 Ozaki Jul 1987 A
4688241 Peugeot Aug 1987 A
4696994 Nakajima et al. Sep 1987 A
4705540 Hayes Nov 1987 A
4777642 Ono Oct 1988 A
4797907 Anderton Jan 1989 A
4818806 Kunimune et al. Apr 1989 A
4819260 Haberrecker Apr 1989 A
4862490 Karnezos et al. Aug 1989 A
4870671 Hershyn Sep 1989 A
4876330 Higashi et al. Oct 1989 A
4878866 Mori et al. Nov 1989 A
4885055 Woodbury et al. Dec 1989 A
4891831 Tanaka et al. Jan 1990 A
4933557 Perkins et al. Jun 1990 A
4939763 Pinneo et al. Jul 1990 A
4957773 Spencer et al. Sep 1990 A
4960486 Perkins et al. Oct 1990 A
4969173 Valkonet Nov 1990 A
4979198 Malcolm et al. Dec 1990 A
4979199 Cueman et al. Dec 1990 A
5010562 Hernandez et al. Apr 1991 A
5063324 Grunwald et al. Nov 1991 A
5066300 Isaacson et al. Nov 1991 A
5077771 Skillicorn et al. Dec 1991 A
5077777 Daly Dec 1991 A
5090046 Friel Feb 1992 A
5105456 Rand et al. Apr 1992 A
5117829 Miller et al. Jun 1992 A
5153900 Nomikos et al. Oct 1992 A
5161179 Suzuki et al. Nov 1992 A
5173612 Imai et al. Dec 1992 A
5196283 Ikeda et al. Mar 1993 A
5217817 Verspui et al. Jun 1993 A
5226067 Allred et al. Jul 1993 A
RE34421 Parker et al. Oct 1993 E
5258091 Imai et al. Nov 1993 A
5267294 Kuroda et al. Nov 1993 A
5343112 Wegmann Aug 1994 A
5391958 Kelly Feb 1995 A
5400385 Blake et al. Mar 1995 A
5422926 Smith et al. Jun 1995 A
5428658 Oettinger et al. Jun 1995 A
5432003 Plano et al. Jul 1995 A
5465023 Garner Nov 1995 A
5469429 Yamazaki et al. Nov 1995 A
5469490 Golden et al. Nov 1995 A
5478266 Kelly Dec 1995 A
5524133 Neale et al. Jun 1996 A
5561342 Roeder et al. Oct 1996 A
5567929 Ouimette Oct 1996 A
RE35383 Miller et al. Nov 1996 E
5571616 Phillips et al. Nov 1996 A
5578360 Viitanen Nov 1996 A
5607723 Plano et al. Mar 1997 A
5621780 Smith et al. Apr 1997 A
5627871 Wang May 1997 A
5631943 Miles May 1997 A
5680433 Jensen Oct 1997 A
5682412 Skillicorn et al. Oct 1997 A
5696808 Lenz Dec 1997 A
5729583 Tang et al. Mar 1998 A
5740228 Schmidt et al. Apr 1998 A
5774522 Warburton Jun 1998 A
5812632 Schardt et al. Sep 1998 A
5835561 Moorman et al. Nov 1998 A
5870051 Warburton Feb 1999 A
5898754 Gorzen Apr 1999 A
5907595 Sommerer May 1999 A
6002202 Meyer et al. Dec 1999 A
6005918 Harris et al. Dec 1999 A
6044130 Inazura et al. Mar 2000 A
6062931 Chuang et al. May 2000 A
6069278 Chuang May 2000 A
6075839 Treseder Jun 2000 A
6097790 Hasegawa et al. Aug 2000 A
6133401 Jensen Oct 2000 A
6134300 Trebes et al. Oct 2000 A
6184333 Gray Feb 2001 B1
6205200 Boyer et al. Mar 2001 B1
6282263 Arndt et al. Aug 2001 B1
6288209 Jensen Sep 2001 B1
6307008 Lee et al. Oct 2001 B1
6320019 Lee et al. Nov 2001 B1
6351520 Inazaru Feb 2002 B1
6385294 Suzuki et al. May 2002 B2
6438207 Chidester et al. Aug 2002 B1
6477235 Chornenky et al. Nov 2002 B2
6487272 Kutsuzawa Nov 2002 B1
6487273 Takenaka et al. Nov 2002 B1
6494618 Moulton Dec 2002 B1
6546077 Chornenky et al. Apr 2003 B2
6567500 Rother May 2003 B2
6646366 Hell et al. Nov 2003 B2
6658085 Sklebitz Dec 2003 B2
6661876 Turner et al. Dec 2003 B2
6740874 Doring May 2004 B2
6778633 Loxley et al. Aug 2004 B1
6799075 Chornenky et al. Sep 2004 B1
6803570 Bryson, III et al. Oct 2004 B1
6803571 Mankos et al. Oct 2004 B1
6816573 Hirano et al. Nov 2004 B2
6819741 Chidester Nov 2004 B2
6838297 Iwasaki Jan 2005 B2
6852365 Smart et al. Feb 2005 B2
6876724 Zhou et al. Apr 2005 B2
6956706 Brandon Oct 2005 B2
6962782 Livache et al. Nov 2005 B1
6976953 Pelc Dec 2005 B1
6987835 Lovoi Jan 2006 B2
7035379 Turner et al. Apr 2006 B2
7046767 Okada et al. May 2006 B2
7085354 Kanagami Aug 2006 B2
7130380 Lovoi et al. Oct 2006 B2
7130381 Lovoi et al. Oct 2006 B2
7203283 Puusaari Apr 2007 B1
7206381 Shimono et al. Apr 2007 B2
7215741 Ukita May 2007 B2
7224769 Turner May 2007 B2
7233647 Turner et al. Jun 2007 B2
7286642 Ishikawa et al. Oct 2007 B2
7305066 Ukita Dec 2007 B2
7358593 Smith et al. Apr 2008 B2
7382862 Bard et al. Jun 2008 B2
7428298 Bard et al. Sep 2008 B2
7448801 Oettinger et al. Nov 2008 B2
7448802 Oettinger et al. Nov 2008 B2
7486774 Cain Feb 2009 B2
7526068 Dinsmore Apr 2009 B2
7529345 Bard et al. May 2009 B2
7618906 Meilahti Nov 2009 B2
7634052 Grodzins Dec 2009 B2
7649980 Aoki et al. Jan 2010 B2
7657002 Burke et al. Feb 2010 B2
7684545 Damento et al. Mar 2010 B2
7693265 Hauttmann et al. Apr 2010 B2
7709820 Decker et al. May 2010 B2
7737424 Xu et al. Jun 2010 B2
7756251 Davis et al. Jul 2010 B2
7983394 Kozaczek Jul 2011 B2
8498381 Liddiard Jul 2013 B2
8929515 Liddiard Jan 2015 B2
8989354 Davis et al. Mar 2015 B2
20020075999 Rother Jun 2002 A1
20020094064 Zhou et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030096104 Tobita et al. May 2003 A1
20030117770 Montgomery et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030152700 Asmussen et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040076260 Charles, Jr. et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040131835 Schmitt et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050018817 Oettinger et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050141669 Shimono et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050207537 Ukita Sep 2005 A1
20060098778 Oettinger et al. May 2006 A1
20060233307 Dinsmore Oct 2006 A1
20060269048 Cain Nov 2006 A1
20070025516 Bard et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070111617 Meilahti May 2007 A1
20070133921 Haffner et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070165780 Durst et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070183576 Burke et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080296479 Anderson et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080296518 Xu et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080317982 Hecht Dec 2008 A1
20090086923 Davis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20100096595 Prud'Homme et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100126660 O'Hara May 2010 A1
20100140497 Damiano, Jr. et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100239828 Cornaby et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100243895 Xu et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100248343 Aten et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100285271 Davis et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100323419 Aten et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110017921 Jiang et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110089330 Thomas Apr 2011 A1
20110121179 Liddiard May 2011 A1
20120025110 Davis Feb 2012 A1
20120087476 Liddiard Apr 2012 A1
20120213336 Liddiard Aug 2012 A1
20130051535 Davis Feb 2013 A1
20130064355 Davis Mar 2013 A1
20130077761 Sipila Mar 2013 A1
20130089184 Sipila Apr 2013 A1
20130094629 Liddiard Apr 2013 A1
20130315380 Davis et al. Nov 2013 A1
20150016593 Larson et al. Jan 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (35)
Number Date Country
1030936 May 1958 DE
4430623 Mar 1996 DE
19818057 Nov 1999 DE
0297808 Jan 1989 EP
0330456 Aug 1989 EP
0400655 May 1990 EP
0676772 Mar 1995 EP
1252290 Nov 1971 GB
57082954 Aug 1982 JP
S6074253 Apr 1985 JP
S6089054 May 1985 JP
3170673 Jul 1991 JP
05066300 Mar 1993 JP
5135722 Jun 1993 JP
06119893 Jul 1994 JP
6289145 Oct 1994 JP
6343478 Dec 1994 JP
8315783 Nov 1996 JP
2001179844 Jul 2001 JP
2003007237 Jan 2003 JP
2003088383 Mar 2003 JP
2003510236 Mar 2003 JP
20033211396 Jul 2003 JP
4171700 Jun 2006 JP
2006297549 Nov 2006 JP
10-2005-0107094 Nov 2005 KR
WO 9965821 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0009443 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0017102 Mar 2000 WO
WO 03076951 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2008052002 May 2008 WO
WO 2009009610 Jan 2009 WO
WO 2009045915 Apr 2009 WO
WO 2009085351 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2010107600 Sep 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (55)
Entry
PCT application EP12167551.6; filed May 10, 2012; Robert C. Davis; European search report mailed Nov. 21, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/899,750; filed Oct. 7, 2010; Steven Liddiard; Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 4, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/855,575; filed Apr. 2, 2013; Robert C. Davis.
Anderson et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/756,962, filed Jun. 1, 2007.
Barkan et al., “Improved window for low-energy x-ray transmission a Hybrid design for energy-dispersive microanalysis,” Sep. 1995, 2 pages, Ectroscopy 10(7).
Blanquart et al.; “XPAD, a New Read-out Pixel Chip for X-ray Counting”; IEEE Xplore; Mar. 25, 2009.
Comfort, J. H., “Plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition of in situ doped epitaxial silicon at low temperatures,” J. Appl. Phys. 65, 1067 (1989).
Das, D. K., and K. Kumar, “Chemical vapor deposition of boron on a beryllium surface,” Thin Solid Films, 83(1), 53-60, Sep. 4, 1981.
Das, K., and Kumar, K., “Tribological behavior of improved chemically vapor-deposited boron on beryllium,” Thin Solid Films, 108(2), 181-188, Oct. 14, 1983.
Grybos et al.; “DEDIX—Development of Fully Integrated Multichannel ASIC for High Count Rate Digital X-ray Imagining systems”; IEEE 2006; Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.
Grybos, “Pole-Zero Cancellations Circuit With Pulse Pile-Up Tracking System for Low Noise Charge-Sensitive Amplifiers”; Mar. 25, 2009; from IEEE Xplore.
Grybos, et al “Measurements of Matching and High Count Rate Performance of Multichannel ASIC for Digital X-Ray Imaging Systems”; IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 54, No. 4, 2007.
Hanigofsky, J. A., K. L. More, and W. J. Lackey, “Composition and microstructure of chemically vapor-deposited boron nitride, aluminum nitride, and boron nitride + aluminum nitride composites,” J. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 74, 301 (1991).
Hexcel Corporation; “Prepreg Technology” brochure; Mar. 2005 http://www.hexcel.com/Reso2882urces/DataSheets/Brochure-Data-Sheets/Prepreg—Technology.pdf.
http://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/xraytubescollidge/MachelettCW250.htm, 1999, 2 pgs.
Komatsu, S., and Y. Moriyoshi, “Influence of atomic hydrogen on the growth reactions of amorphous boron films in a low-pressure B.sub.2 H.sub.6 +He+H.sub.2 plasma”, J. Appl. Phys. 64, 1878 (1988).
Komatsu, S., and Y. Moriyoshi, “Transition from amorphous to crystal growth of boron films in plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition with B.sub.2 H.sub.6 +He,” J. Appl. Phys., 66, 466 (1989).
Komatsu, S., and Y. Moriyoshi, “Transition from thermal-to electron-impact decomposition of diborane in plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition of boron films from B.sub.2 H.sub.6 +He,” J. Appl. Phys. 66, 1180 (1989).
Lee, W., W. J. Lackey, and P. K. Agrawal, “Kinetic analysis of chemical vapor deposition of boron nitride,” J. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 74, 2642 (1991).
Lines, U.S. Appl. No. 12/352,864, filed Jan. 13, 2009.
Lines, U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,120, filed Mar. 17, 2010.
Maya, L., and L. A. Harris, “Pyrolytic deposition of carbon films containing nitrogen and/or boron,” J. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 73, 1912 (1990).
Michaelidis, M., and R. Pollard, “Analysis of chemical vapor deposition of boron,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 1757 (1985).
Micro X-ray Tube Operation Manual, X-ray and Specialty Instruments Inc., 1996, 5 pages.
Moore, A. W., S. L. Strong, and G. L. Doll, “Properties and characterization of codeposited boron nitride and carbon materials,” J. Appl. Phys. 65, 5109 (1989).
Nakajima et al; Trial Use of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Plastic as a Non-Bragg Window Material of X-Ray Transmission; Rev. Sci. Instrum.; Jul. 1989; pp. 2432-2435; vol. 60, No. 7.
Nakamura, K., “Preparation and properties of amorphous boron nitride films by molecular flow chemical vapor deposition,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 1757 (1985).
Neyco, “SEM & TEM: Grids”; catalog; http://www.neyco.fr/pdf/Grids.pdf#page=1 , Sep. 2009.
Panayiotatos, et al., “Mechanical performance and growth characteristics of boron nitride films with respect to their optical, compositional properties and density,” Surface and Coatings Technology, 151-152 (2002) 155-159.
Perkins, F. K., R. A. Rosenberg, and L. Sunwoo, “Synchrotronradiation deposition of boron and boron carbide films from boranes and carboranes: decaborane,” J. Appl. Phys. 69,4103 (1991).
Powell et al., “Metalized polyimide filters for x-ray astronomy and other applications,” SPIE, pp. 432-440, vol. 3113.
Rankov. A. “A Novel Correlated Double Sampling Poly-Si Circuit for Readout System in Large Area X-Ray Sensors”, 2005.
Roca i Cabarrocas, P., S. Kumar, and B. Drevillon, “In situ study of the thermal decomposition of B.sub.2 H.sub.6 by combining spectroscopic ellipsometry and Kelvin probe measurements,” J. Appl. Phys. 66, 3286 (1989).
Scholze et al., “Detection efficiency of energy-dispersive detectors with low-energy windows” X-Ray Spectrometry, X-Ray Spectrom, 2005: 34: 473-476.
Sheather, “The support of thin windows for x-ray proportional counters,” Journal Phys,E., Apr. 1973, pp. 319-322, vol. 6, No. 4.
Shirai, K., S.-I. Gonda, and S. Gonda, “Characterization of hydrogenated amorphous boron films prepared by electron cyclotron resonance plasma chemical vapor deposition method,” J. Appl. Phys. 67, 6286 (1990).
Tamura, et al “Developmenmt of ASICs for CdTe Pixel and Line Sensors”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 52, No., 5, Oct. 2005.
Tien-Hui Lin et al., “An investigation on the films used as teh windows of ultra-soft X-ray counters.” Acta Physica Sinica, vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 276-83, May 1978, abstract only.
Vandenbulcke, L. G., “Theoretical and experimental studies on the chemical vapor deposition of boron carbide,” Indust. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 24, 568 (1985).
Viitanen Veli-Pekka et al., Comparison of Ultrathin X-Ray Window Designs, presented at the Soft X-rays in the 21st Century Conference held in Provo, Utah Feb. 10-13, 1993, pp. 182-190.
Wagner et al, “Effects of Scatter in Dual-Energy Imaging: An Alternative Analysis”; IEEE; Sep. 1989, vol. 8. No. 3.
Winter, J., H. G. Esser, and H. Reimer, “Diborane-free boronization,” Fusion Technol. 20, 225 (1991).
Wu, et al.; “Mechanical properties and thermo-gravimetric analysis of PBO thin films”; Advanced Materials Laboratory, Institute of Electro-Optical Engineering; Apr. 30, 2006.
www.moxtek.com, Moxtek, AP3 Windows, Ultra-thin Polymer X-Ray Windows, 2 pages, Sep. 2006.
www.moxtek.com, Moxtek, DuraBeryllium X-Ray Windows, 2 pages, May 2007.
www.moxtek.com, Moxtek, ProLine Series 10 Windows, Ultra-thin Polymer X-Ray Windows, 2 pages, Sep. 2006.
www.moxtek.com, Moxtek, Sealed Proportional Counter X-Ray Windows, 3 pages, Oct. 2007.
www.moxtek.com, X-Ray Windows, ProLINE Series 20 Windows Ultra-thin Polymer X-ray Windows, 2 pages, Sep. 2006.
Yan, Xing-Bin, et al., Fabrications of Three-Dimensional ZnO-Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Hybrids Using Self-Assembled CNT Micropatterns as Framework, 2007. pp. 17254-17259, vol. III.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,154; filed Dec. 17, 2009; Krzysztof Kozaczek.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/783,707; filed May 20, 2010; Steven D. Liddiard.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/899,750; filed Oct. 7, 2010; Steven Liddiard.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/018,667; filed Feb. 1, 2011; Lei Pei.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/307,579; filed Nov. 30, 2011; Dongbing Wang.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/312,531; filed Dec. 6, 2011; Steven Liddiard.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130064355 A1 Mar 2013 US
Provisional Applications (4)
Number Date Country
61486547 May 2011 US
61495616 Jun 2011 US
61511793 Jul 2011 US
61689458 Jun 2012 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13667273 Nov 2012 US
Child 13670710 US
Parent 13453066 Apr 2012 US
Child 13667273 US