1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to abrasive jet machines used to cut or otherwise machine process various materials by generating a focused stream of fluid mixed with abrasive particles. The present invention relates in particular, to abrasive jet machines which use a pressurized liquid as the driving fluid to propel the abrasive particles for cutting or other machining operation.
The present invention is further related to an abrasive waterjet apparatus with a variable flow rate of an abrasive material to be entrained within the given fluid jet, wherein the flow rate is adaptively modulated to suit a particular operation of such apparatus.
Also, the present invention is related to an abrasive jet apparatus having an automatically controlled metering orifice for the abrasive dispenser, whereby flow rate of the abrasive material dispensed therethrough is adaptively regulated over a broad range of applications of the abrasive jet apparatus without operator intervention.
2. Prior Art
Abrasive waterjet cutting is a machining process where a focused ultrahigh velocity waterjet is used to accelerate abrasive particles which perform cutting. The high velocity waterjet is formed by pumping a fluid, such as for example, water to high pressure through a small diameter orifice. The resulting mixture of abrasive particles and water is discharged through a focusing tube as a high velocity composite jet to perform cutting or milling upon a workpiece.
In abrasive waterjet cutting, a water flow orifice restricts and accelerates the flow of high pressure water, typically at approximately 50 KSI to 65 KSI. This high speed jet of water is capable of cutting through various materials with relative ease. For metals, ceramics and other such materials, abrasives are added to the jet to increase the tribologic effect.
Abrasive waterjets typically employ a mini-hopper abrasive dispenser that is in turn fed by a large pressurized bulk hopper. Different sizes of abrasive materials (typically garnet having a mesh size within an approximate range of 80 to 220 mesh) are available for use with abrasive waterjets. An operator selects the abrasive size suitable for the material, thickness, finish, and other such parameters of the given workpiece, and sets the appropriate flow rate for the abrasive material which matches the size of the water flow orifice and focusing tube.
A typical abrasive waterjet apparatus 10 known in the art is illustrated in
The abrasive material flow 20, having been regulated by the metering orifice 16 and admitted by the abrasive valve 22, freefalls until it meets an air jet 24. Shortly after passage by the abrasive valve 22, the abrasive material transitions from a freefall state to one of entrainment within a high speed air jet, forming an air/abrasive flow 26. The air/abrasive flow 26 is inducted into a waterjet mixing chamber 28 at a partial vacuum, and enters a mixing (or focusing) tube 30 where it contacts and mixes with the high speed waterjet. A highly focused abrasive/waterjet 32 is then expelled from the focusing tube 30 toward the workpiece 36 to be processed. Abrasive material size and flow rate are chosen in light of the specific operation to be performed upon that particular workpiece 36.
Note that the abrasive flow rate used for such machining operations as light material removal may not be sufficient for punching a hole or slicing through a thick section of the workpiece material. The operation may become overly time consuming, among other things. Conversely, a higher abrasive flow rate usually employed for cutting a thick section would not be appropriate for gently forming a delicate, sculptured shape. Presently known abrasive waterjet machines use either a fixed or manually selectable metering orifice that permits very limited control over the flow rate of the abrasive material, thus preventing optimal adaptation of the abrasive material flow rate, much less precise active control thereof. There is a need in the art, therefore, for a system and method whereby the mass flow rate of an abrasive material may be simply yet accurately adapted for assorted abrasive jet machining operations.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an abrasive jet apparatus in which an abrasive material flow rate exiting an abrasive dispenser is regulated to adaptively suit the particular machining operation intended.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an abrasive jet apparatus wherein an opening of a metering orifice of the abrasive dispenser is actively adjusted by electrically driven positioning actuator in a manner corresponding to the type of machining operation intended and the type of a workpiece material to be processed in an accurate and reliable yet efficient manner.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an abrasive jet apparatus which concurrently stores more than one abrasive material in the abrasive dispenser, and selectively dispenses the materials in flow rate controlled manner.
These and other objects are attained by a system and method realized in accordance with the present invention. In one exemplary embodiment, the abrasive jet apparatus comprises an abrasive dispenser defining a compartment for storing a granular abrasive material and at least one metering orifice disposed in open communication therewith for dispensing the granular abrasive material. The apparatus also includes a shutter assembly disposed adjacent the metering orifice, which includes a shutter member angularly displaceable between first and second positions relative to the metering orifice. The shutter member has formed therethrough at least one shutter opening that in the first position is substantially fully aligned with the metering orifice, and in the second position is substantially fully offset therefrom. The apparatus further includes a position actuator operatively coupled to the shutter mechanism for reversibly displacing the shutter member to the first and second positions and a plurality of intermediate positions therebetween for occluding a selective portion of the metering orifice. A flow rate of the abrasive material dispensed through said metering orifice is thereby maintained at a predetermined level.
Referring now to
An automatically driven shutter assembly 74 is provided adjacent the bottom wall portion to selectively and variably occlude each metering orifice or a portion thereof. In broad concept, then, the rate of granular abrasive material 44 dispensed through a metering orifice 54 is actively controlled—and thereby suitably regulated for the cutting or other machining task at hand—by setting the shutter assembly to occlude a corresponding portion of that metering orifice 54, obviating the need to replace the orifice with one of another size/configuration, or to repeatedly open and close the orifice to control flow therethrough. As described in greater detail in following paragraphs, feedback control measures are preferably employed to actively monitor and adapt the degree of orifice occlusion, so as to dynamically maintain optimum flow rate for the abrasive material 44.
Though it may be formed in alternate embodiments with various other configurations suitable for the specific application intended, each metering orifice 54 is preferably configured in the exemplary embodiment illustrated as an arcuately contoured opening radially offset from, and extending in substantially concentric manner about, an axial reference 56 defined on the bottom wall 52, as best illustrated in
During operation, the abrasive material 44 is dispensed effectively in appropriate amounts by release through the non-occluded portion of metering orifice 54, as illustrated in
Depending on the type of operation to be performed on the workpiece 72, the abrasive material content—in terms of proportional content and granularity—in the liquid/abrasive cutting jet 70 may require variation to maintain optimum efficiency. For instance, a gentle sculpting or surface treating operation would tend to require a lower proportional content (and possibly even a finer grain) of abrasive material 44 in the cutting jet 70. On the other hand, a more rigorous operation such as punching a hole or slicing through a thick section of the workpiece 72 material would tend to require a higher proportional content (and possibly a courser grain) of abrasive material 44 in the cutting jet 70. In accordance with the present invention, the optimal flow rate necessary to preserve the desired abrasive material content in the cutting jet 70 is maintained by actively controlling shutter assembly 74 to suitably position a shutter 100 thereof to occlude an appropriate portion of the given metering orifice 54.
In order to increase the efficacy of the abrasive jet apparatus 40 in this manner during assorted abrasive jet machining operations upon the same workpiece 72, the shutter assembly 74 is automatically actuated by a drive shaft 76 preferably controlled by a servomotor 78. It is to be understood that instead of the servomotor 78, a stepper motor, voice coil, or any other suitable type of positioning actuator known in the art may be used in the abrasive jet apparatus 40.
The positioning actuator, further referred to herein simply as motor 78 (for brevity), is preferably positioned above the level of the abrasive material 44, such that it is safely protected from the particles of the abrasive material. As shown in
A drive shaft 76 is coupled to the motor 78 by means of a flexible shaft coupling 90 at an upper end 92 thereof, and extends axially through the abrasive dispenser 46. The drive shaft, too, is protected from potentially damaging contact the particles of the abrasive material 44 by a sleeve-like tubular shaft guide 94 through which it coaxially extends and within which it freely rotates.
The tubular shaft guide 94 acts as a loose bearing to support and restrain the drive shaft 76 coaxially along the axial reference 56. Preferably, the opposing surfaces of the shaft guide 94 and drive shaft 76 maintain sliding contact when the drive shaft 76 is rotated during operation. The shaft guide 94 and drive shaft 76 are, therefore, preferably formed of dissimilar materials particularly suitable for such relative sliding contact. For example, the shaft guide 94 may be formed of such material as stainless steel, with the drive shaft 76 itself being formed of such material as brass or anodized aluminum. Lower weight materials are preferable particularly for the drive shaft 76 to minimize inertial effects and thereby optimize rotational responsiveness to motor actuation (access times, for instance). Various materials known in the art may be employed in accordance with the present invention to best suit the specific requirements of the intended application.
The shutter assembly 74 is preferably coupled by a coupling collar 102 to a lower end 96 of the drive shaft 76. The assembly 74 is formed as shown in
When the motor 78 is turned to an “ON” state, it actuates the drive shaft 76 which, in turn, rotates the shutter member 100 of the shutter assembly 74 in a controlled fashion. This adjusts the overlap between its shutter opening 101 and the corresponding metering orifice(s) 54, in order to control the flow rate of the abrasive material 44 through that metering orifice 54. As best shown in
The shutter member 100 is preferably formed of a hard, abrasion-resistant material to withstand repeated frictional contact with the abrasive material 44. It is preferably formed of a blue-tempered spring steel material, although other suitable materials known in the art may be used. In one exemplary application of the disclosed embodiment, the shutter member 100 is formed, for instance, with its planar portion having a thickness of approximately 1/32 inch, exhibiting a representative hardness of C49–51. Such parameters will, of course, vary depending on the particularities of the intended application; and, they are set out for illustrative purposes only, the present invention not being limited in any way thereto.
Turning next to
In the embodiment of
The embodiment of
While these represent by example other viable configurations for the shutter assembly 74, the ease with which linearity between the degree of orifice occlusion and the resulting abrasive material flow rate may be realized varies with the configurations. In this regard, the arcuate metering orifice configuration disclosed herein offers notable advantages, as described in following paragraphs (with reference to
In accordance with the present invention, the abrasive jet apparatus 40 may employ a data processor 104 of any suitable type known in the art suitably programmed with a database 106 (or a look-up table, for example) or other known means by which the desired, or ideal, parametric values relating to the type of operation to be performed by the apparatus 40 and the required degree of metering orifice occlusion may be stored for ready access. Data processor 104, being operationally coupled to the motor 78, may control the operational parameters of the motor 78 accordingly, so that the opening of the metering orifice 54 is automatically controlled to maintain optimal abrasive material flow rate regulation during operation.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the apparatus 40 preferably includes feedback control measures which employ an abrasive flow sensor 108 disposed at or near the mouth of abrasive valve chamber 60 through which the air/abrasive mixture 62 is expelled. Preferably, this sensor 108 a transmit/receive components such as a Light Emitting Diode (LED) 110 and a photo detector 112 optically coupled thereto. In the embodiment shown, these components are positioned at diametrically opposed sides of the abrasive/air mixture 62 flow to monitor for variation. A detection output generated by the photo detector 112 is coupled to the processor 104 for appropriate control processing. Depending on the flow data indicated by this detection output, the processor 104 adjusts the operation of the motor 78 to either open or close the metering orifice 54 to the degree necessary to adjust the flow rate of the abrasive material and thereby maintain optimum cutting conditions.
Additionally, or alternatively, another type of the feedback measure may be implemented using an encoder 114 operationally coupled to the shutter assembly 74 to acquire and transmit to the processor 104 data indicating the relative disposition of the shutter member 100 and the metering orifice 54. Operational parameters of the motor 78 may then be adjusted based upon this data to effect appropriate abrasive material flow rate control, much as described in preceding paragraphs.
As shown in
As with any structural component that directly contacts the abrasive material 44, the outer casing 118 is formed of a suitably strong, tough, and wear-resistant material. Examples of suitable materials for components such as the bottom wall 52, motor mount, and the hopper/dispensing compartment walls include stainless steel, a hard coat anodized aluminum, and the like. For the outer casing 118, a clear polycarbonate or other such material may be particularly suitable, as the abrasive material 44 contained therein would then remain visible for the operator. There is little practical likelihood of excessive erosive hazing on the interior surfaces when such materials are used, given that the abrasive material's kinetic energy which typically accounts most for erosive hazing remains minimal prior to dispensing.
The outer casing 118 is formed with an abrasive material feed port 124 for introduction of the abrasive material 44 into the hopper compartment 42 from an outside source, and a breather port 126 for the venting necessary to relieve the residual pressure urging the abrasive material 44 into the hopper compartment 42. The abrasive dispenser will thereby be at ambient pressure, and be released through the non-occluded portion of the metering orifice 54 sufficiently by gravity.
In certain alternate embodiments, drive shaft 76 acts both as an aspiration conduit as well as a torque communicating member between the motor 78 and shutter assembly 74, it concurrently serves as the aspiration conduit through which the high speed air jet 58 is directed. As shown in
To minimize destabilizing inertial effects, this drive tube 76 is preferably formed of a material of any suitable type known in the art having minimal weight yet sufficient strength and durability to effectively withstand the torsional forces to be encountered in the intended application. While not shown for clarity, a guide shaft tube 94 is preferably disposed coaxially about the drive shaft/tube 76′ much as it is in the embodiment described in preceding paragraphs. The guide shaft tube 94 accordingly serves not only as a protective barrier for the drive tube 76′, it acts as a loose bearing to support and restrain the drive tube 76′ coaxially along the axial reference 56.
The flexible coupling 90 by which the drive tube 76′ is coupled to the drive actuating motor 78 is preferably of a helical coupling type such as made available by MCMASTER-CARR. Typically, such helical couplings are formed with generally cylindrical outer walls in which a plurality of helical cuts (or surface grooves) are provided to accommodate a certain degree of flexion without undue compromise of torsional stiffness. The high speed air jet 58 induced during operation through the drive tube 76′ in this embodiment is preferably drawn through the space defined by the helical cuts themselves.
A notable advantage provided by this embodiment is that the abrasive material 44 is caused to be entrained in the air jet 58 more immediately upon release from the abrasive dispenser 46. Another advantage is one of structural simplicity, obviating the need for extraneous structural measures otherwise incorporated in other embodiments (such as a spray shield 122 for defining a path about the outer casing 118) for directing the high speed air jet 58 to the point of abrasive material release.
In this as well as other embodiments disclosed herein, an advantage inhering in the concentric rotational movement preferably employed to adaptively adjust the shutter member 100 is that both the shutter member 100 and its drive shaft 76 (or drive tube 76′) naturally operate to clear themselves of abrasive material particles or other debris. The centrifugal force generated by these components' own concentric rotational movement serves to propel or cast away, in self-clearing manner, any such particles or debris that might collect thereon, otherwise.
In the alternate embodiment of
As also shown in the embodiment of
Turning now to the alternate embodiment illustrated in
The dual abrasive hopper structure may be employed to dispense abrasive materials 44 of altogether different type, or more typically to dispense abrasive materials 44 of the same type, but having different granularity. For example, a garnet material having preselected course and fine mesh sizes (typically selected from an approximate range of about 80 to 220 mesh) may be stored and dispensed selectively from the hopper structure. This enables the resulting apparatus 40 to carry out bulk material removal/cuts just as readily as fine feature contouring operations on the same target workpiece 72, without pause for significant reconfiguration.
As shown in
To guard against inadvertent leakage of abrasive material 44 through the metering orifice 54, a guard band region 141 is preserved between the metering orifice 54 and the shutter opening 101 of the shutter member 100. That is, the metering orifice 54 and the shutter opening 101 are so configured and positioned, respectively, that when they are disposed in the maximally offset positions (diametrically opposed positions in the embodiment shown), their nearest peripheral extremities remain at least a preset distance away from one another. For example, a pair of guard band regions 141 of approximately 15° in angular extent (about the axial reference 56) define dead zones, by which the shutter member 100 must be angularly displaced at the very least (from the maximally offset position) before any portion of its shutter opening 101 will overlap any portion of the metering orifice 54.
In this embodiment, a secondary metering arc restrictor 146 is shown coaxially disposed between the metering orifice 54 and the shutter member 100. Formed with any configuration suitable for the given orifice and shutter opening configurations, this secondary metering arc restrictor 146 effectively serves a static adjustment function. Much like the shutter member 100, the secondary metering arc restrictor 146 is formed with one or more openings 146′ which partially occlude the given metering orifice 54 when appropriately aligned therewith. If, for instance, the granularity or material composition of the selected abrasive materials preclude use of the entire metering orifice 54 allocated thereto, the secondary metering arc restrictor 146 may be suitably set in position to restrict the orifice shape or size as needed. Dynamic control of the shutter member 100 may then proceed as in other embodiments, but with the metering orifice 54 so restricted.
In certain embodiments, this secondary metering arc restrictor 146 may be configured with an arcuate opening contoured and positioned relative to the axial reference 56 in much the same manner that the metering orifice might be configured and positioned in other embodiments. Angular displacement of the secondary metering arc restrictor 146 relative to the orifice 54 would then variy the position of the residual orifice segment for subsequent use. Use of such secondary metering arc restrictor 146 of this or other suitable configuration need not be limited to the embodiment of
In arrangements where the metering orifice 54 is contoured as an arc, the most significant nonlinearities occur at the ends 142 and 144 of that metering arc. In the middle section of the arc, each increment of the shutter member's motion (typically within 0.2° in positional accuracy, at an approximate 50 ms seek time) preferably uncovers/occludes substantially the same ratio of edge-to-cross-sectional area. As expected, the abrasive particles experience the most discernible shear forces near the edges 142 and 144 of the fixed arc, such discernible forces being largely absent near the middle of the arc. Therefore, by modifying the ends of the arc (for any given abrasive particle size), by a suitably compensating tapered shape for example, it is possible to diminish or eliminate the discontinuity of the end edge effect.
The metering arc 54 may thus be tailored for specific applications in numerous other respects. For example, the metering arc 54 may be configured such that a finer adjustment capability (for a given increment of shutter member motion) at one end of the arc graduates to a courser adjustment capability (i.e., much higher flow rate) at the other.
Referring to
It is worth mentioning that the shutter member 100 operates to itself occlude only along one edge of the abrasive flow through the metering orifice 54, such that shear effects are kept to a minimum. Also, a custom shaft collar 102 is preferably employed as shown in
Referring now to
In one example, the abrasive jet apparatus 40 formed in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention typically exhibits the following advantages and characteristics, which are listed purely for illustrative, not limiting, purposes:
In one example, the abrasive jet apparatus 40 formed in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention is found to operate sufficiently within the following set of parametric criteria. Such parametric criteria are listed, again, purely for illustrative purposes, and the present invention is not limited thereto.
Although the present invention has been described in connection with specific forms and embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated that various modifications other than those discussed above may be resorted to without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims. For example, equivalent elements may be substituted for those specifically shown and described, certain features may be used independently of other features, and in certain cases, particular locations of elements may be reversed or interposed, all without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
This Utility Patent Application is based on Provisional Patent Application No. 60/537,036, filed 20 Jan. 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3109262 | Weaver, et al. | Nov 1963 | A |
3428257 | Kentfield et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
3510065 | Gigantino et al. | May 1970 | A |
3576222 | Acheson et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3737108 | Stumphauzer et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3796371 | Taylor, et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3843055 | Nord et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
4236674 | Dixon | Dec 1980 | A |
4346848 | Malcolm | Aug 1982 | A |
4471913 | Hofmann | Sep 1984 | A |
4555872 | Yie | Dec 1985 | A |
4587772 | Griffiths | May 1986 | A |
4627573 | Havens et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4669760 | Hashish et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4708214 | Krawza et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4711056 | Herrington et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4776412 | Thompson | Oct 1988 | A |
4805839 | Malek | Feb 1989 | A |
4817874 | Jarzebowicz | Apr 1989 | A |
4819388 | Kirkland | Apr 1989 | A |
4848671 | Saurwein | Jul 1989 | A |
4854091 | Hashish et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4913353 | Myers | Apr 1990 | A |
4936059 | Hashish et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4951429 | Hashish et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4957242 | Schadow et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5018317 | Kiyoshige et al. | May 1991 | A |
5018670 | Chalmers | May 1991 | A |
5046668 | Ikeuchi et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5052624 | Boers et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5054249 | Rankin | Oct 1991 | A |
5060869 | Bekius | Oct 1991 | A |
5092085 | Hashish et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5144766 | Hashish et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5170946 | Rankin | Dec 1992 | A |
5209406 | Johnson | May 1993 | A |
5209446 | Kawai | May 1993 | A |
5320289 | Hashish et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5341608 | Mains, Jr. | Aug 1994 | A |
5365816 | Rudy | Nov 1994 | A |
5390450 | Goenka | Feb 1995 | A |
5469768 | Schumacher | Nov 1995 | A |
5494124 | Dove et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5551909 | Bailey | Sep 1996 | A |
5607109 | Von Berg | Mar 1997 | A |
5626508 | Rankin et al. | May 1997 | A |
5704825 | LeCompte | Jan 1998 | A |
5765578 | Brandt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782673 | Warehime | Jul 1998 | A |
5785258 | Akin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785582 | Stefanik et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5851139 | Xu | Dec 1998 | A |
5860849 | Miller | Jan 1999 | A |
5868323 | Cantor | Feb 1999 | A |
5878966 | Asakawa et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5881558 | Kawahara et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5881958 | Asakawa et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5921476 | Akin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5975431 | Harita et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5992404 | Bleyer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5992763 | Smith et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6012653 | Gunther et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6036116 | Bui | Mar 2000 | A |
6062957 | Klaft et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065683 | Akin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077152 | Warehime | Jun 2000 | A |
6119964 | Lombari | Sep 2000 | A |
6123413 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126524 | Shepherd | Oct 2000 | A |
6155245 | Zanzuri | Dec 2000 | A |
6161781 | Kojima et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168503 | Pao et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6280302 | Hashish et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283832 | Shepherd | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293857 | Allard | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6425805 | Massa et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6530823 | Ahmadi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6752685 | Ulrich et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6846221 | Ulrich et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60537036 | Jan 2004 | US |