The present invention relates generally to wind turbines, and more particularly, to systems and methods for controlling a wind turbine in partial load operation using a variable rated speed set point.
Wind power is considered one of the cleanest, most environmentally friendly energy sources presently available, and wind turbines have gained increased attention in this regard. A modern wind turbine typically includes a tower, a generator, a gearbox, a nacelle, and a rotor. The rotor typically includes a rotatable hub having one or more rotor blades attached thereto. A pitch bearing is typically configured operably between the hub and a blade root of the rotor blade to allow for rotation about a pitch axis. The rotor blades capture kinetic energy of wind using known airfoil principles. The rotor blades transmit the kinetic energy in the form of rotational energy so as to turn a shaft coupling the rotor blades to a gearbox, or if a gearbox is not used, directly to the generator. The generator then converts the mechanical energy to electrical energy that may be deployed to a utility grid.
At low wind speeds, there is insufficient torque exerted by the wind on the rotor blades to make them rotate. However, as the wind speed increases, the rotor of the wind turbine begins to rotate and generate electrical power. The wind speed at which the wind turbine first starts to rotate and generate power is generally referred to as the cut-in wind speed. As the wind speed rises above the cut-in wind speed, the level of electrical power rises rapidly until the power output reaches the limit that the electrical generator of the wind turbine is capable of, which is generally referred to as the rated power output. Similarly, the wind speed at which the rated power is reached is generally referred to as the rated wind speed. At wind speeds above the rated wind speed, the wind turbine is designed to limit the power output to the rated power. To avoid damage to the wind turbine, a braking system is typically employed when the wind speed reaches a cut-out wind speed. Thus, for conventional operation, the rated wind speed is a constant value. In other words, when the rotor reaches the rated power from an increase in wind speed, it maintains that value as winds continue to increase.
Typically, the wind turbine operates such that it reaches a rated rotor speed at a wind speed at or below the rated wind speed. In the upper partial load region of operation, defined on a torque-speed curve as the portion at rated speed and increasing torque to rated power, the wind turbine experiences lower performance due to operating away from its optimal tip speed ratio (TSR). Such operation introduces the potential for reduced aerodynamic efficiency and the need to mitigate that potential. Increasing the rotor speed allows the wind turbine to maintain optimum TSR operation up to a higher wind speed; however, the system is electrically, mechanically, and/or thermally limited such that it cannot maintain the higher generator speed at rated power levels.
Accordingly, a system and method that addresses the aforementioned problems would be welcomed in the technology. For example, a system and method that incorporates a variable rated speed set point in partial load operation of the wind turbine would be advantageous.
Aspects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the following description, or may be obvious from the description, or may be learned through practice of the invention.
In one aspect, the present subject matter is directed to a method for operating a wind turbine during partial load operation. The method includes determining a power output of the wind turbine. The method also includes determining whether the power output is below a rated power of the wind turbine. If the power output is at the rated power, the method includes maintaining a speed set point of the wind turbine equal to a rated speed set point. However, if the power output is below the rated power and an operational space exists below system constraints of the wind turbine, then the method includes varying, via the controller, the speed of the wind turbine based on a non-monotonic torque-speed relationship.
In another embodiment, the step of varying the speed of the wind turbine based on the non-monotonic torque-speed relationship may include operating to an increased speed set point of the wind turbine above the rated speed set point at rated power until at least one of the system constraints are reached. Further, the step of varying the speed of the wind turbine based on the non-monotonic torque-speed relationship may include decreasing the speed of the wind turbine as a function of the torque after reaching the increased speed set point of the wind turbine above the rated speed set point until rated power is reached. More specifically, in such embodiments, the method may include decreasing the speed of the wind turbine back to the rated speed set point after at least one of the system constraints are reached.
In further embodiments, the method may include dynamically calculating the increased speed set point as a function of the torque or power of the wind turbine. More specifically, in certain embodiments, the step of dynamically calculating the increased speed set point as a function of the torque or the power of the wind turbine may include receiving, via a turbine controller, the electrical constraints of one or more components from a converter controller of the wind turbine in real-time, calculating a plurality of intermediate speed set points as a function of the torque of the wind turbine for the electrical constraints, and selecting one of the plurality of intermediate speed set points to be the speed set point.
In alternative embodiments, the method may include determining the increased speed set point based on the torque or the power via one or more look-up tables.
In several embodiments, the method may further include increasing one or more over-speed condition margins of the wind turbine in response to varying the speed set point of the wind turbine as a function of a torque of the wind turbine.
It should be understood that the system constraint(s) may include mechanical constraints, electrical constraints, and/or thermal constraints of one or more components of the wind turbine. More specifically, in such embodiments, the mechanical constraints of the one or more components of the wind turbine may include loads determined by direct measurement, loads calculated based on internal models of the controller, loads calculated based on operational history of the wind turbine, loads calculated based on a wind resource, simulated loading profiles, or combinations thereof. Further, the electrical constraints of the one or more components of the wind turbine may include a grid condition, a reactive power demand, converter current margins, converter voltage margins, cable ampacity, internal or external power commands, a grid strength, ambient conditions, thermal margins, temperature, or similar.
In another aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a system for operating a wind turbine during partial load operation. The system includes a controller having one or more processors. The processor(s) are configured to perform one or more operations, including but not limited to providing a rated power for the wind turbine and comparing a power output of the wind turbine with the rated power. If the power output is at the rated power, the processor is configured to maintain a speed set point of the wind turbine equal to a rated speed set point. Alternatively, if the power output is below the rated power, the processor is configured to vary the speed of the wind turbine based on a non-monotonic torque-speed relationship. It should be understood that the system may also include any of the additional features described herein.
In yet another aspect, the present subject matter is directed to a method for operating a wind turbine during partial load operation. The method includes providing a rated power for the wind turbine. If a power output of the wind turbine is at the rated power, the method includes maintaining a speed of the wind turbine equal to a rated speed set point. In contrast, however, if the power output is below the rated power, the method includes operating the speed of the wind turbine based on a non-monotonic torque-speed relationship and system constraints of the wind turbine. It should be understood that the method may also include any of the additional steps and/or features described herein.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference the following description and appended claims. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate the embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended figures, in which:
Reference now will be made in detail to embodiments of the invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment can be used with another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Generally, the present disclosure is directed to systems and methods that utilize a variable speed set point that is introduced into the controller in an effort to improve the partial-load performance of a wind turbine that is speed-limited in its partial-load operation condition. Such control systems are particularly useful for wind turbines that operate using doubly-fed induction generators (DFIGs). For conventional wind turbines, the rated speed set point is a constant value. Thus, when the rotor first reaches the rated speed set point from an increase in wind speed, it maintains that value even as wind speeds continue to increase. In the present disclosure, however, the speed set point for the partial load operation condition is higher than the speed set point at rated power. As such, the present disclosure utilizes the existing system margins at below-rated power operation. Further, the new torque-speed curve is a non-monotonic curve that is defined by a new constraint that follows the electrical, mechanical, or thermal system capability curve in upper partial load.
As used herein, non-monotonic operation refers to a relationship between two operating conditions that is not continuously increasing or decreasing. More specifically, a non-monotonic speed-torque relationship is defined as when torque increases, the speed does not always increase as torque increases, rather at a certain point (e.g. an inflection point), speed will start to decrease as torque continues to increase. In contrast, monotonicity refers generally to the characteristic of a function with a first derivative that does not change sign, which is characteristic of standard torque-speed operation. Non-monotonicity is the converse, in which determining whether the dependent variable is decreasing depends on the value and direction of the independent variable.
The various embodiments of the system and method described herein provide numerous advantages not present in the prior art. For example, the controller change can be implemented using existing turbine software. Further, by increasing the rotor speed, the systems and methods of the present disclosure allow the wind turbine to maintain optimum tip speed ratio operation up to a higher wind speed so as to maintain the peak region of the power coefficient longer. Thus, the present disclosure expands the operational space of the wind turbine and increases power performance. In addition, the present disclosure improves stall margin for fouled or iced blades.
Referring now to the figures,
The wind turbine 10 may also include a wind turbine controller 26 centralized within the nacelle 16. However, in other embodiments, the controller 26 may be located within any other component of the wind turbine 10 or at a location outside the wind turbine. Further, the controller 26 may be communicatively coupled to any number of the components of the wind turbine 10 in order to control the operation of such components and/or to implement a correction action. As such, the controller 26 may include a computer or other suitable processing unit. Thus, in several embodiments, the controller 26 may include suitable computer-readable instructions that, when implemented, configure the controller 26 to perform various different functions, such as receiving, transmitting and/or executing wind turbine control signals.
Referring now to
Each rotor blade 22 may also include a pitch adjustment mechanism 32 configured to rotate each rotor blade 22 about its pitch axis 28. Further, each pitch adjustment mechanism 32 may include a pitch drive motor 40 (e.g., any suitable electric, hydraulic, or pneumatic motor), a pitch drive gearbox 42, and a pitch drive pinion 44. In such embodiments, the pitch drive motor 40 may be coupled to the pitch drive gearbox 42 so that the pitch drive motor 40 imparts mechanical force to the pitch drive gearbox 42. Similarly, the pitch drive gearbox 42 may be coupled to the pitch drive pinion 44 for rotation therewith. The pitch drive pinion 44 may, in turn, be in rotational engagement with a pitch bearing 46 coupled between the hub 20 and a corresponding rotor blade 22 such that rotation of the pitch drive pinion 44 causes rotation of the pitch bearing 46. Thus, in such embodiments, rotation of the pitch drive motor 40 drives the pitch drive gearbox 42 and the pitch drive pinion 44, thereby rotating the pitch bearing 46 and the rotor blade 22 about the pitch axis 28. In further embodiments, the wind turbine 10 may employ direct drive pitch or a separate pitch drive systems including hydraulics. Similarly, the wind turbine 10 may include one or more yaw drive mechanisms 66 communicatively coupled to the controller 26, with each yaw drive mechanism(s) 66 being configured to change the angle of the nacelle 16 relative to the wind (e.g., by engaging a yaw bearing 68 of the wind turbine 10).
Still referring to
Referring now to
As used herein, the term “processor” refers not only to integrated circuits referred to in the art as being included in a computer, but also refers to a controller, a microcontroller, a microcomputer, a programmable logic controller (PLC), an application specific integrated circuit, a graphics processing unit (GPUs), and/or other programmable circuits now known or later developed. Additionally, the memory device(s) 60 may generally comprise memory element(s) including, but not limited to, computer readable medium (e.g., random access memory (RAM)), computer readable non-volatile medium (e.g., a flash memory), a floppy disk, a compact disc-read only memory (CD-ROM), a magneto-optical disk (MOD), a digital versatile disc (DVD) and/or other suitable memory elements. Such memory device(s) 60 may generally be configured to store suitable computer-readable instructions that, when implemented by the processor(s) 58, configure the controller 26 to perform various functions as described herein.
Referring now to
However, if the power output is below the rated power, as shown at 108, the method 100 also includes determining whether a torque set point of the wind turbine 10 is at or above a system constraint of the wind turbine 10. If the torque set point is below system constraint(s), as shown at 110, the method 100 may include targeting the speed set point to a maximum value and maintaining optimal torque as a function of the speed. If the torque set point is at or above system constraints, however, as shown at 112, then the method 100 includes varying (e.g. via the controller 26) the speed of the wind turbine based on a non-monotonic torque-speed relationship. For example, in one embodiment, the controller 26 may be configured to increase the speed of the wind turbine 10 above the rated speed set point as a function of the torque until at least one of mechanical constraints, electrical constraints, or thermal constraints of one or more components of the wind turbine 10 are reached. More specifically, the mechanical constraints of the one or more components of the wind turbine 10 may include loads determined by direct measurement, loads calculated based on internal models of the controller, loads calculated based on operational history of the wind turbine, loads calculated based on a wind resource, simulated loading profiles, or combinations thereof. Further, the electrical constraints of the one or more components of the wind turbine 10 may include a grid condition, a reactive power demand, converter current margins, converter voltage margins, cable ampacity, internal or external power commands, a grid strength, ambient conditions, thermal margins, temperature, or similar.
Referring now to
The applicability of the non-monotonic torque-speed curve 72 is determined by the torque achieved in the generator and the power converter of the wind turbine 10 (not shown). For example, for conventional systems, there is a single variable speed region that increases torque at a defined slope from a minimum speed to a maximum speed. The slope is defined by maintaining an optimal tip speed ratio. In contrast, as shown in
After the speed of the wind turbine 10 reaches the increased speed set point 76, the non-monotonic torque-speed curve 72 maintains the maximum operational speed until one or more system limits are reached. (
In particular embodiments, the controller 26 may dynamically calculate the increased speed set point 76 as a function of the torque, power, and/or other sensed inputs to the controller 26. More specifically, in such embodiments, the controller 26 may receive one or more electrical constraints of one or more components from a converter controller of the wind turbine 10 in real-time. Thus, the controller 26 can use the electrical constraints to calculate a plurality of intermediate speed set points as a function of the torque of the wind turbine 10. Further, the controller 26 may select one of the plurality of intermediate speed set points to be the speed set point and the process may be updated as the electrical constraints change. In alternative embodiments, the controller 26 may determine the increased speed set point 76 based on the torque or power of the wind turbine 10 via one or more look-up tables.
Advantages of the present disclosure can be further understood with respect to the graphs illustrated in
Referring particularly to
As shown in
In certain instances, increasing the speed as described above may cause an increase in the over-speed set points of the wind turbine protection system. As such, the present disclosure also provides for certain over-speed handling techniques. For example, as shown in
Referring now to
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they include structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4703189 | DiValentin et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
5155375 | Holly | Oct 1992 | A |
5652485 | Spiegel et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5798631 | Spec et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6856041 | Siebenthaler et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6888262 | Blakemore | May 2005 | B2 |
7004724 | Pierce et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7081689 | Tilscher et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7175389 | Moroz | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7261672 | Frank et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7281891 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7342323 | Avagliano et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346462 | Delmerico | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351033 | McNerney | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7352075 | Willey et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7420289 | Wang et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7476485 | Hatakeyama et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7476985 | Llorente Gonzalez | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7504738 | Barton et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505833 | Delmerico et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7573149 | Kammer et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7586206 | Barton et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7602075 | Erdman et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613548 | Cardinal et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7704043 | Kabatzke et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7750490 | Scholte-Wassink | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7808126 | Stiesdal | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7822560 | LeMieux | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7861583 | Honhoff et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7870783 | Yoshida et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7883317 | Ormel et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7942629 | Shi et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7950901 | Barbu et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7964979 | Miranda et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7979167 | Delmerico et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7994658 | Cardinal et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8025476 | Zheng et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8035241 | Subramanian et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8050887 | Ahmann | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8050899 | Giguere et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8093737 | Wittekind et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8121738 | Teichmann et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8128362 | Andersen et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8183707 | Siebers et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8210811 | Loh et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8212373 | Wittekind et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8257040 | Chen et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8262354 | Hoffmann | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8269363 | Arinaga | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8301310 | Nim | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8328514 | Viripullan et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8360722 | Hoffmann et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8441138 | Gjerlov et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8610306 | Kirchner | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8698334 | Bo et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8704393 | Perley et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8779611 | Kabatzke et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8793027 | Nyborg et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8858174 | Lee et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9014861 | Attia | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9200614 | Godsk | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9361606 | Hertel et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9551321 | Gerber et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9587628 | Narayana et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9605558 | Perley et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9624905 | Perley et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9631606 | Slack et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20030185665 | Hansen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20060273595 | Avagliano et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080195255 | Lutze et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090001724 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090088991 | Brzezowski et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099702 | Vyas et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090220340 | Pierce et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090295159 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100098540 | Fric et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100241280 | Garcia Barace et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100283245 | Gjerlov et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312594 | Andersen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110064573 | Viripullan | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110084485 | Miranda et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110140425 | Staedler | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110142634 | Menke et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153096 | Pal et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120014794 | Bailey | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120027586 | Hoffman et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120078517 | Bogucki | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120086209 | Obrecht | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120133138 | Sorensen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120161444 | Tarnowski | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165996 | Olesen | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130033040 | Bowyer et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130156577 | Esbensen et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130181450 | Narayana et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130243590 | Edenfeld | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140217742 | Caruso | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140288855 | Deshpande | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150159625 | Hardwicke, Jr. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150167637 | Kooijman et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150267686 | Kjaer et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150377216 | Deshpande et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160065105 | Hardwicke, Jr. et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160222944 | Stoltenjohannes et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2006215082 | Aug 2006 | AU |
102009022236 | May 2009 | DE |
2302207 | Mar 2011 | EP |
1798413 | Jan 2012 | EP |
2444659 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2 492 499 | Aug 2012 | EP |
2063111 | Dec 2013 | EP |
3 032 095 | Jun 2016 | EP |
2463518 | Nov 2016 | EP |
3 351 789 | Jul 2018 | EP |
2545535 | Sep 2015 | ES |
2586802 | Oct 2016 | ES |
200700978 | Jul 2007 | IN |
200602033 | Aug 2008 | IN |
201404569 | Feb 2015 | IN |
201502582 | Sep 2015 | IN |
201505796 | Jan 2016 | IN |
271727 | Mar 2016 | IN |
05799159 | Oct 2015 | JP |
WO2005010358 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO2008124185 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2010069534 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO2011000531 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO2011015383 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO2011076818 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO2011076875 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO2011101475 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO2011157271 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO2011160634 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO2012044161 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO2012103668 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO2012149984 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO2012164387 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO2013000468 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO2013091638 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2016119791 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO2016138906 | Sep 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Understanding Coefficient of Power (Cp) and Betz Limit” Kidwind Science Snack: Betz Limit. |
Extended European Search Report and Opinion issued in connection with corresponding EP Application No. 18176766.6 dated Oct. 18, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180363628 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |