The present invention relates to a variable resonator and a variable filter.
A variable resonator capable of independently changing the resonance frequency and the bandwidth of the resonance frequency is disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2008-206078.
As shown in
The resonance frequency can be changed by changing the reactance value of the variable reactance blocks 2, and the bandwidth can be changed by changing the switch 3 to be turned on.
However, the variable resonator described in the Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2008-206078 requires a switch having high isolation characteristics as the switch 3 and thus is expensive to manufacture.
To solve the problem, the present invention uses a parallel resonant circuit instead of the switch.
Replacing the switch with the parallel resonant circuit reduces the cost of manufacturing a variable resonator and a variable filter.
The variable resonator comprises a closed annular line part 1, at least two parallel resonant circuits 4 having variable characteristics, and N variable reactance blocks 2 (N represents an integer equal to or greater than 3 (N≧3)).
The line part 1 is made of a conductor, such as metal, and formed on one surface of a dielectric substrate. A grounding conductor made of a conductor, such as metal, is formed on a surface of the dielectric substrate opposite to the surface on which the line part 1 is formed (referred to as a back surface).
The line part 1 is an annular line having a length that provides a phase shift of 2π or 360° at a desired resonance frequency, that is, a length equal to one wavelength or an integral multiple thereof at the resonance frequency. In
The term “length” means the perimeter of the annular line. More specifically, the term “length” means the distance from a point on the annular line to the same point along the circumference of the annular line.
The “desired resonance frequency” is one of typical performance requirements of the resonator and can be arbitrarily designed. The variable resonator can be used in an alternating-current circuit. Although there is no particular constraint on the resonance frequency of the variable resonator, the variable resonator is particularly useful when the resonance frequency is a high frequency of 100 kHz or higher, for example.
The line part 1 preferably has a uniform characteristic impedance. The expression “have an uniform characteristic impedance” means that when the annular line part 1 is cut with respect to a circumference direction so as to be fragmented into segments, these segments have severally the same characteristic impedance. However, a perfectly uniform characteristic impedance is not an essential technical factor, and the line part 1 only needs to have a substantially uniform characteristic impedance from a practical viewpoint. Assuming that the dimension of the line part 1 in the direction perpendicular to the circumference thereof is referred to as a width of the line part 1, the line part 1 has an uniform characteristic impedance when the line part 1 has substantially the same width at any point along the circumference, if the dielectric substrate has a uniform relative dielectric constant, for example.
An impedance Z is expressed by a formula: Z=R+jX (where j represents an imaginary unit). Ideally, for the impedance ZL of the variable reactance block 2, R is equal to zero (R=0), and X is variable. Although R is practically not equal to zero (R≠0), it has no effect on the basic principle of the present invention. Specific examples of the variable reactance block 2 include a circuit element, such as a variable capacitor, a variable inductor and a transmission line, a circuit formed by combining the same ones of the circuit elements described above, and a circuit formed by combining different ones of the circuit elements described above. As described later, the variable reactance block 2 may be the same circuit as the parallel resonant circuit 4.
The N variable reactance blocks 2 need to be able to have the same or substantially the same reactance value. The reason why the N variable reactance blocks 2 only need to have “substantially the same” reactance value, or in other words, why the N variable reactance blocks 2 are not strictly required to have exactly the same reactance value as a design requirement is that, although a slight difference in reactance value among the N variable reactance blocks 2 leads to a slight fluctuation of the resonance frequency (that is, the desired resonance frequency cannot be kept), such a slight fluctuation of the resonance frequency is accommodated in the bandwidth and thus poses no practical problem. In the following, it is assumed that a description of the N variable reactance blocks 2 as having the same reactance value can include this meaning.
The N variable reactance blocks 2 are electrically connected to the line part 1 as a branch circuit along the circumference thereof at equal electrical distances at a resonance frequency at which one wavelength or an integral multiple thereof equals to the perimeter of the line part 1. In a practical design, the resonance frequency at which one wavelength or an integral multiple thereof equals to the perimeter of the line part 1 can be the resonance frequency of the variable resonator having no variable reactance block 2 connected thereto, for example. If the dielectric substrate has a uniform relative dielectric constant, the equal electrical distances are equivalent to equal physical distances. In this case, if the line part 1 has a circular shape, the N variable reactance blocks 2 are connected to the line part 1 at intervals where each central angle formed by the center O of the line part 1 and connection points of any adjacent two of the N variable reactance blocks 2 is 360° divided by N (see
In the example shown in
The resonance frequency can be changed by changing the reactance value of the variable reactance block 2. For details, see the Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2008-206078.
The parallel resonant circuit 4 is a circuit that can achieve parallel resonance at a desired frequency or, in other words, a circuit that has an infinite impedance at a desired frequency and can change the resonance frequency. As a specific example of the parallel resonant circuit 4,
The parallel resonant circuits 4 are electrically connected to the line part 1 at one end thereof at different positions along the circumference of the line part 1. The parallel resonant circuits 4 are connected to a grounding conductor provided on the back surface of the dielectric substrate, for example, at the other end thereof. However, the parallel resonant circuit 4 can be formed by a transmission line, for example, and therefore, the end of the parallel resonant circuit 4 opposite to the end connected to the line part 1 does not always have to be grounded.
The positions on the line part 1 at which one ends of the parallel resonant circuits 4 are electrically connected can be appropriately determined so as to achieve a desired bandwidth. The parallel resonant circuits 4 can be connected to the positions at which the variable reactance blocks 2 are connected to the line part 1.
The bandwidth can be changed by changing the capacitance value of the variable capacitors 4a to vary the impedance of the parallel resonant circuits 4 disposed at different positions to values excluding infinity and minus infinity.
In the example shown in
First, the resonance frequency is assumed to be 5 GHz, for example. To change the bandwidth, the variable capacitance Cr of the variable reactance blocks 2 is set at 0 pF. For any of the parallel resonant circuits 41, 42 and 43 that is equivalent to a switch in the open state, the capacitance value of the variable capacitor 4a is set so that the variable capacitor 4a and the inductive reactance element 4b achieve parallel resonance.
One of the parallel resonant circuits is selected as a circuit to operate as the switch in the ON state, and the capacitance value of the variable capacitor of the parallel resonant circuit is set at Con. The capacitance value of the variable capacitor of the remaining parallel resonant circuits is set at Coff, so that the parallel resonant circuits operate as the switch in the open state. As shown in
Next, a case where the resonance frequency is 4.2 GHz, the capacitance value Cr of the variable reactance blocks 2 is 0.5 pF, and the inductor has an inductance of 1 nH will be considered. In this case, when the capacitance value of the variable capacitor of the parallel resonant circuits 41, 42 and 43 is 1.43 pF, the impedance of the parallel resonant circuits 41, 42 and 43 is approximately infinite, as shown in
As can be seen from the above description, the bandwidth can be changed by changing the capacitance value of the variable capacitor of the parallel resonant circuits. The principle is the same as that described in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2008-206078 and therefore will not be further described herein.
The attenuation in a lower-frequency-side proximity to the resonance frequency can be increased by changing the value Con while keeping the values Cr and Coff fixed or, in other words, by changing the capacitance value of the variable capacitor of the parallel resonant circuit that operate as a switch in an ON state. More specifically, the frequency of an attenuation pole on the lower frequency side of the resonance frequency and the frequency of an attenuation pole on the higher frequency side of the resonance frequency can be raised by decreasing the capacitance value of the variable capacitor of any one of the parallel resonant circuits that operates as a switch in an ON state.
For example,
The parallel resonant circuit 4 may be a parallel resonant circuit including a transmission line as shown in
As shown in
The parallel resonant circuit 4 may be circuits shown in
The parallel resonant circuit 4 is not limited to those illustrated in
The variable reactance blocks 2 may be disposed as illustrated in
If the dielectric substrate has a uniform relative dielectric constant, the equal electrical distances are equivalent to equal physical distances. In this case, M/2 variable reactance blocks 2 are connected to the line part 1 along the circumference thereof within a range clockwise from an arbitrarily set position (equivalent to the position K1 described above) to a position spaced away from that position by a half of the perimeter L of the line part 1 (equivalent to the position K2 described above), the positions on the line part 1 at which the variable reactance blocks 2 are connected being spaced apart from each other by a distance of (L/M)*m (m represents an integer that satisfies a condition that 1≦m≦M/2). Similarly, the remaining M/2 variable reactance blocks 2 are connected to the line part 1 along the circumference thereof within a range counterclockwise from the position K1 to the position K2 spaced away from the position K1 by a half of the perimeter L of the line part 1, the positions on the line part 1 at which the variable reactance blocks 2 are connected being spaced apart from each other by a distance of (L/M)*m (m represents an integer that satisfies a condition that 1≦m≦M/2). That is, no variable reactance block 2 is connected to the line part 1 at the position K1, and two variable reactance blocks 2 are connected to the line part 1 at a position K2 clockwise or counterclockwise spaced apart from the position K1 by a distance of (L/M)*M/2.
In particular, if the line part 1 has a circular shape, the M variable reactance blocks 2 are connected to the line part 1 at angular positions, about the center O of the line part 1, clockwise spaced apart from the arbitrarily set position K1 by an angle of 360° divided by M and multiplied by m and angular positions counterclockwise spaced apart from the position K1 by an angle of 360° divided by M and multiplied by m. The position clockwise spaced apart from the position K1 along the circumference of the line part 1 by an angle of 360° divided by M and multiplied by M/2 agrees with the position counterclockwise spaced apart from the position K1 along the circumference of the line part 1 by an angle of 360° divided by M and multiplied by M/2, and two variable reactance blocks 2 are connected to the line part 1 at the point (a circle α shown by a dashed line in
The two variable reactance blocks 2 electrically connected to the line part 1 at the position K2, that is, the two variable reactance blocks 2 shown in the circle a shown by the dashed line in
Alternatively, as shown in
In the above and similar variable resonators, the variable reactance blocks 2 are electrically connected to the line part 1 having an annular shape. However, as shown in
The perimeter of the line part 1 yet to be cut is the same as the sum of the lengths of the line segments. In the example shown in
In other words, the variable resonator shown in
The parallel resonant circuit 4 can change the reactance component of the input impedance of the parallel resonant circuit by changing the capacitance of the variable capacitor in the circuit and therefore can be used also as the variable reactance block 2. In other words, the same circuit can be used as the parallel resonant circuit 4 and the variable reactance block 2. This allows inexpensive mass production of the variable resonator and the variable filter, and the variable resonator and the variable filter are more suitable for the semiconductor manufacturing technology that involves inexpensive mass production of identical parts.
The present invention is not limited to the embodiment described above but can be appropriately modified without departing from the spirit of the present invention. For example, although a microstrip line structure is shown as an example in the embodiment described above, the present invention is not limited to such a line structure but can use other line structures, such as a coplanar waveguide structure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2009-261838 | Nov 2009 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5162759 | Yajima | Nov 1992 | A |
6326865 | Kundu et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
7135940 | Kawakubo et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7292124 | Kawai et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7583168 | Kawai et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
8106727 | Kawai et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8324988 | Kawai et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8330562 | Kawai et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20030025563 | Christensen | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030034858 | Zhu | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20080204168 | Kawai et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20130057363 | Kawai et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101252217 | Aug 2008 | CN |
1 962 367 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2001-230602 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2004-7352 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2005-217852 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005-295316 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2007-166596 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2008-206078 | Sep 2008 | JP |
10-2008-0078566 | Aug 2008 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Dimitrios Peroulis et al., “Tunable Lumped Components with Applications to Reconfigurable MEMS Filters”, IEEE MTT-S Digests, 2001, 4 pages. |
Hong-Teuk Kim et al., “Low-Loss and Compact V-Band MEMS-Based Analog Tunable Bandpass Filters”, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 12, No. 11, Nov. 2002, 3 pages. |
E. Fourn et al., “Bandwidth and Central Frequency Control on Tunable Bandpass Filter by Using MEMS Cantilevers”, IEEE MTT-S Digest, 2003, 4 pages. |
Arnaud Pothier et al., “Low-Loss 2-Bit Tunable Bandpass Filters Using MEMS DC Contact Switches”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 53, No. 1, Jan. 2005, 7 pages. |
Bruce E. Carey-Smith et al., “Wide Tuning-Range Planar Filters Using Lumped-Distributed Coupled Resonators”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 53. No. 2, Feb. 2005, 9 pages. |
Kamran Entesari et al., “A Differential 4-bit 6.5-10-GHz RF MEMS Tunable Filter”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 53, No. 3, Mar. 2005, 8 pages. |
Kamran Entesari et al. “A 12-18-GHz Three-Pole RF MEMS Tunable Filter”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 53, No. 8, Aug. 2005, 6 pages. |
Lung-Hwa Hsieh et al., “Slow Wave Bandpass Filters Using Ring or Stepped-Impedance Hairpin Resonators”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 50, No. 7, Jul. 2002, 6 pages. |
Kunihiro Kawai et al., “Tunable Resonator Employing Comb-Shaped Transmission Line and Switches”, Proceedings of 35th European Microwave Conference, Oct. 2005, 4 pages. |
Arun Chandra Kundu et al., “Attenuation Pole Frequency Control of a Dual-Mode Circular Microstrip Ring Resonator BPF”, Proceedings of 29th European Microwave Conference, Oct. 1999, 4 pages. |
Kunihiro Kawai et al., “Tunable Band-pass Filter Employing Comb-shaped Transmission Line Resonator”, Electronics Society Conference of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, C-2-37, 2005, 4 pages. (with English Translation). |
Kunihiro Kawai et al., “Center-frequency and Bandwidth Tunable Band-pass Filter Employing Comb-shaped Transmission Line Resonator”, General Conference of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, C-2-35, 2006, 4 pages. (with English Translation). |
Kunihiro Kawai et al., “Center Frequency and Bandwidth Tunable Filter Employing Tunable Comb-Shaped Transmission Line Resonators and J-inverters”, Proceedings of 36th European Microwave Conference, Sep. 2006. 4 pages. |
Kunihiro Kawai et al., “Comb-shaped Transmission Line Tunable Resonator Employing MEMS RF Switches”, Electronics Society Conference of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, C-2-77, 2006, 4 pages. (with English Translation). |
Lei Zhu et al., “A Joint Field/Circuit Design Model of Microstrip Ring Dual-Mode Filter: Theory and Experiments”, Proceedings of 1997 Asia Pacific Microwave Conference, 1997, 4 pages. |
S.H. Al-Charchafchi et al., “Varactor tuned microstrip ring resonators”, IEE Proceedings, vol. 136, Pt. H, No. 2, Apr. 1989, 4 pages. |
T. Scott Martin et al., “Electronically Tunable and Switchable Filters Using Microstrip Ring Resonator Circuits”, IEEE MTT-S Digest, 1988, 4 pages. |
P. Gardner et al., “Microwave voltage tuned microstrip ring resonator oscillator”, Electronics Letters, vol. 30, No. 21, Oct. 13, 1994, 2 pages. |
Michiaki Matsuo et al., “Dual-Mode Stepped-Impedance Ring Resonator for Bandpass Filter Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 49, No. 7, Jul. 2001, 6 pages. |
Hitoshi Ishida et al., “A design of tunable UWB filters”, IEEE International Workshop on Ultra Wideband Systems, May 2004, 5 pages. |
Kouki Saitou et al., “Tunable Duplexer Having Multilayer Structure Using LTCC”, IEEE MTT-S Digest, 2003, 4 pages. |
F. A. Miranda et al., “A K-Band (HTS,Gold)/Ferroelectric Thin Film/Dielectric Diplexer for a Discriminator-Locked Tunable Oscillator”, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. vol. 9, No. 2, Jun. 1999, 4 pages. |
Kunihiro Kawai at al., “Ring Resonators for Bandwidth and Center Frequency Tunable Filter”, Proceedings of the 37th European Microwave Conference, Oct. 2007, 4 pages. |
Kunihiro Kawai et al., “Tunable Ring Resonator Filter for Duplexer”, Proceedings of the 38th European Microwave Conference, Oct. 2008, 4 pages. |
Kunihiro Kawai et al., “Center Frequency, Bandwidth, and Transfer Function Tunable Bandpass Filter Using Ring Resonator and J-inverter”, Proceedings of the 39th European Microwave Conference, Sep. 29-Oct. 1, 2009, 4 pages. |
Extended European Search Report issued Mar. 22, 2011, in Patent Application No. 10190524.8. |
Chinese Office Action issued Mar. 11, 2013, in China Patent Application No. 201010551081.6 (with English translation). |
Office Action issued Jun. 14, 2012 in European Application No. 10 190 524.8. |
Office Action issued Dec. 9, 2011 in Korea Application No. 10-2010-0110221 (With English Translation). |
Office Action issued Dec. 20, 2011 in Japan Application No. 2009-261838 (With English Translation). |
Second Office Action issued Oct. 10, 2013 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201010551081.6 with English Translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110115574 A1 | May 2011 | US |