The present invention relates to digital filtering, and more particularly to a variable sample rate recursive digital filter that maintains a constant frequency response over a range of sample rates.
A problem that is common to several signal processing applications, such as sampling rate conversion, jitter/wander compensation and/or measurement, picture quality measurement and the like, is trying to maintain a constant frequency response over a range of sample rates. In picture quality measurement based on human vision models where test and reference video sequences are viewed with different formats, displays (frame rates, spatial resolutions) and viewing distances (different spatial sample rates within the field of view for the human eye), it is important to maintain both efficiency and accuracy. Maintaining the spatial and temporal frequency response of an adaptive filter, such as that described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/858,775 filed May 16, 2001, allows one to simulate the perceptual difference between viewing a video sequence close to a display (i.e., two screen heights) and far away (i.e., 10 screen heights) without the need for re-sampling, for example.
Prior methods require either re-sampling or re-calibration of the human vision model. Calibration may be very time consuming, so it is not desirable to calibrate for every distinct viewing distance. Re-sampling involves resampling the data twice, once for the input to the human vision model and then for the intermediate human vision model image just prior to calculations involving both reference and test video (differencing). This requires extra processing and introduces interpolation inaccuracies.
What is desired is a variable sample rate recursive digital filter that maintains a constant frequency response over a range of sample rates without requiring re-sampling or re-calibration for each new sample rate.
Accordingly the present invention provides a variable sample rate recursive digital filter that changes filter coefficients of an adaptive digital filter according to respective equivalent sample rates. The adaptive digital filter is calibrated initially for a specific sample rate which determines specific filter coefficients to be used. When the sample rate is changed, a ratio is determined between the calibrated or initial sample rate and the new sample rate and from the ratio a coefficient factor is calculated. The coefficient factor is used to modify the initial filter coefficients for the calibrated sample rate to produce new coefficients for the new sample rate. The new coefficients are applied to the adaptive digital filter to provide the desired signal processing without requiring re-sampling or re-calibration and without changing the frequency response.
The objects, advantages and other novel features of the present invention are apparent from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the appended claims and attached drawing figure.
Referring now to
The control signals, or new coefficients, for the digital filters 18, 20 to give the equivalent response of re-sampling both the input and output are derived from taking the ratio of bilinear transforms at respective sample rates. Traditionally a bilinear transform B converts the filter poles in the z-domain (spatial) to the s-domain (frequency) where the sample rate changes are linear. The pole in the s-domain is multiplied by a sample rate ratio and then converted back to the z-domain.
B{Pz}→Ps; B−1{Ps*R}→P′z=K*Pz
where B is the bilinear transform, Pz is the filter pole in the z-domain, Ps is the transformed filter pole in the s-domain, R is the ratio of the initial and new sample rates, K is a constant or zFactor, and P′z is the new filter pole transformed back to the z-domain.
Given an initial or calibrated sample rate and a corresponding filter coefficient, the new filter coefficient for the new sample rate is obtained by multiplying the initial filter coefficient by K or zFactor determined as follows:
zFactor(z,R):=(1/z){(z(1+R)+(1−R))/(z(1−R)+(1+R))}
where z=initial z-domain coefficient and R=ratio of sample rates (old/new). This equation is illustrated by FIG. 2 and may be implemented in hardware or in software.
Consider a recursive, first order, difference equation for a filter of the form:
yn+1:=yn+c(xn−yn);yn=yn−1+c(xn−1−yn−1)=(1−c)yn−1+cxn−1.
The Z-transform of the equation is:
H(z,c):=c/(z−1+c)
If DC gain is held to unity: c/(1−1+c)=1; then z=1 and H(z,c)=1 and the filter has a pole at (1−c), i.e., for c=0.3, pole=0.7.
The frequency response is given by:
F(c,ω):=H(e−jω,c) and ωn=π(n/N) where n/N varies between 0 and 1.
The following is an example matching a filter composite frequency response after temporal resampling based on the bilinear transform. The illustrative filter is a bandpass filter generated from the difference between two lowpass filters. If the initial sample rate T0 is 1/60 and the respective lowpass filter coefficients are Cts0=0.6 and Ctc0=0.48, then when the rate changes to T1=1/24 the ratio R becomes 0.4, i.e., T0/T1=(1/60)/(1/24)=24/60=0.4. Then the new coefficients become Cts1:=zFactor(Cts0,R)*Cts0 and Ctc1:=zFactor(Ctc0,R)*Ctc0, i.e., Cts1=0.818 and Ctc1=0.754. The new sample rate ω1=ω0*R. The frequency response of the bandpass filter is then given by Ft0(ω):=|F(Ctc0,ω)2−F(Cts0,ω))2| for the initial sample rate and Ft1(ω):=|F(Ctc1,ω)2−F(Cts1,ω)2| for the new sample rate. When scaled appropriately and plotted together as shown in
Thus the present invention provides a variable sample rate recursive digital filter by using a bilinear transform to determine a coefficient factor as a function of an initial coefficient and a ratio of an initial sample rate and a new sample rate, the coefficient factor being used to adjust the initial coefficient for the new sample rate so that when applied to the variable sample rate recursive digital filter the frequency response at the different sample rates is constant.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4797845 | Stikvoort | Jan 1989 | A |
5928313 | Thompson | Jul 1999 | A |
6134570 | Camagna et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6201832 | Choi | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6531970 | McLaughlin et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6704358 | Li et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
20010025290 | Schollhorn | Sep 2001 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0002311 | Jan 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030031281 A1 | Feb 2003 | US |