The present invention relates, in general, to medical devices, e.g., expandable stents, and, more particularly, to an enhanced method of delivering medical devices into a body lumen, such as a blood vessel, at a delivery rate or speed that varies from a relatively slow initial delivery speed during initial positioning to increasingly faster delivery speed along the remaining length of the stent.
Atherosclerosis is the deposition of fatty plaques on the luminal surface of arteries, which in turn causes narrowing of the cross-sectional area of the artery. Ultimately, this deposition blocks blood flow distal to the lesion causing ischemic damage to the tissues supplied by the artery. Atherosclerosis of the arteries, coronary or peripheral, is a pervasive disease. For example, coronary artery atherosclerosis disease (CAD) is the most common, serious, chronic, life-threatening illness in the United States, affecting more than 11 million persons. The social and economic costs of atherosclerosis vastly exceed that of most other diseases. Narrowing of the coronary artery lumen causes destruction of heart muscle resulting first in angina, followed by myocardial infarction and finally death. There are over 1.5 million myocardial infarctions in the United States each year, and six hundred thousand (or 40%) of those patients suffer an acute myocardial infarction and more than three hundred thousand of those patients die before reaching the hospital (Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 14th Edition, 1998). Narrowing of the peripheral arteries is debilitating and can severely affect the quality of life of afflicted patients.
A number of percutaneous intravascular procedures have been developed for treating stenotic atherosclerotic regions of a patient's vasculature to restore adequate blood flow. The most successful of these treatments is percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). In PTA, a catheter, having an expansible distal end usually in the form of an inflatable balloon is inserted into a peripheral artery and threaded through the arterial system into the blocked artery and is positioned in the blood vessel at the stenotic site. The balloon is then inflated to flatten the obstructing fatty plaque and dilate the vessel, thereby restoring adequate blood flow beyond the diseased region. Other procedures for opening stenotic regions include directional arthrectomy, rotational arthrectomy, laser angioplasty, stenting, and the like. While these procedures have gained wide acceptance (either alone or in combination, such as PTA in combination with stenting), they continue to suffer from significant disadvantages. A particularly common disadvantage with PTA and other known procedures for opening stenotic regions is the frequent occurrence of restenosis.
Restenosis refers to the re-narrowing of an artery after an initially successful angioplasty. Restenosis afflicts approximately up to 50% of all angioplasty patients and is the result of injury to the blood vessel wall during the lumen opening angioplasty procedure. In some patients, the injury initiates a repair response that is characterized by smooth muscle cell proliferation referred to as “hyperplasia” in the region traumatized by the angioplasty. Acutely, restenosis involves recoil and shrinkage of the vessel, which are followed by proliferation of medial smooth muscle cells. This proliferation of smooth muscle cells re-narrows the lumen that was opened by the angioplasty within a few weeks to a few months, thereby necessitating a repeat PTA or other procedure to alleviate the restenosis. As many as 50% of the patients who are treated by PT A require a repeat procedure within six months to correct restenosis.
Narrowing of the arteries can occur in vessels other than the coronary arteries, including, but not limited to, the aortoiliac, infrainguinal, distal profunda femoris, distal popliteal, tibial, subclavian, mesenteric, carotid, and renal arteries. Peripheral artery atherosclerosis disease (“PAD”, also known as peripheral arterial occlusive disease) commonly occurs in arteries in the extremities (feet, hands, legs, and arms). Rates of PAD appear to vary with age, with an increasing incidence of PAD in older individuals. Data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey estimate that every year, 55,000 men and 44,000 women have a first-listed diagnosis of chronic PAD and 60,000 men and 50,000 women have a first-listed diagnosis of acute PAD. Ninety-one percent of the acute PAD cases involved the lower extremity. The prevalence of comorbid CAD in patients with PAD can exceed 50%. In addition, there is an increased prevalence of cerebrovascular disease among patients with PAD.
A number of different techniques have been used to overcome the problem of restenosis, including treatment of patients with various pharmacological agents or mechanically holding the artery open with a stent or synthetic vascular graft (Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 14th Edition, 1998). Of the various procedures used to overcome restenosis, stents have proven to be the most effective. Stents are metal scaffolds that are permanently implanted in the diseased vessel segment to hold the lumen open and improve blood flow. Placement of a stent in the affected arterial segment thus prevents recoil and subsequent closing of the artery.
There are broadly two types of stents: self-expanding stents and balloon expandable stents. Stents are typically formed from malleable metals, such as 300 series stainless steel, or from resilient metals, such as super-elastic and shape memory alloys, e.g., Nitinol™ alloys, spring stainless steels, and the like. They can also, however, be formed from non-metal materials such as non-degradable or biodegradable polymers or from bioresorbable materials such as levorotatory polylactic acid (L-PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA) or other materials such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,660,827.
A variety of stent geometries are known in the art, including, without limitation, slotted tube type stents, coiled wire stents and helical stents. Stents are also classified into two general categories based on their mode of deployment. The first type of stent is expandable upon application of a controlled force, such as the inflation of the balloon portion of a dilatation catheter that upon inflation of the balloon or other expansion methods expands the compressed stent to a larger, fixed diameter to be left in place within the artery at the target site. The second type of stent is a self-expanding stent formed from shape memory metal or super-elastic alloy such as nickel-titanium (NiTi) alloys that automatically expands or springs from a compressed state to an expanded shape that it remembers.
Exemplary stents are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,553,545 to Maass et al.; U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,733,665 and 4,739,762 to Palmaz; U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,800,882 and 5,282,824 to Gianturco; U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,856,516, 4,913,141, 5,116,365 and 5,135,536 to Hillstead; U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,649,922, 4,886,062, 4,969,458 and 5,133,732 to Wiktor; U.S. Pat. No. 5,019,090 to Pinchuk; U.S. Pat. No. 5,102,417 to Palmaz and Schatz; U.S. Pat. No. 5,104,404 to Wolff; U.S. Pat. No. 5,161,547 to Tower; U.S. Pat. No. 5,383,892 to Cardon et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,449,373, 5,733,303, 5,843,120, 5,972,018, 6,443,982, and 6,461,381 to Israel et al.; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,292,331, 5,674,278, 5,879,382 and 6,344,053 to Boneau et al.; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,421,955, 5,514,154, 5,603,721, 5,728,158, and 5,735,893 to Lau; U.S. Pat. No. 5,810,872 to Kanesaka et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,925,061 to Ogi et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,800,456 to Maeda et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,117,165 to Becker; U.S. Pat. No. 6,358,274 to Thompson; U.S. Pat. No. 6,395,020 to Ley et al.; U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,042,597 and 6,488,703 to Kveen et al.; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,821,292 to Pazienza et al., which are all incorporated by reference herein.
Stents are usually delivered in a compressed condition to the target site and then, deployed at that location into an expanded condition to support the vessel and help maintain it in an open position. The delivery system used to implant or deploy at the stent target site in the diseased vessel using a delivery system that comprises a catheter that carries the stent and a control system that allows the stent to be deployed from the catheter into the vessel.
A common method for using such a system to deliver a stent is to advance the catheter into the body of a patient, by directing the catheter distal end percutaneously through an incision and along a body passage until the stent is located within the desired site. The term “desired site” refers to the location in the patient's body currently selected for treatment by a health care professional. After the stent is deployed at the desired site, it will tend to resiliently expand to press outward on the body passage.
Like many catheter systems, a stent delivery system is often used with a flexible guidewire. The guidewire is often metal, and is slidably inserted along the desired body passage. The catheter system is then advanced over the guidewire by “back-loading” or inserting the proximal end of the guidewire into a distal guidewire port leading to a guidewire lumen defined by the catheter system.
Many catheter systems define guidewire lumens that extend along the entire length or almost all of the catheter. These catheter systems are described as “over-the-wire” catheters, in that the guidewires resides inside a catheter lumen throughout the length of the catheter. Over-the-wire catheter systems provide several advantages, including improved trackability, preventing prolapse of the guidewire, the ability to flush the guidewire lumen while the catheter is in the patient, and the capability of easily removing and exchanging the guidewire while retaining the catheter in a desired position in the patient.
In some circumstances it may be desirable to provide a “rapid-exchange” catheter system, which offers the ability to easily remove and exchange the catheter while retaining the guidewire in a desired position within the patient. Rapid exchange catheters are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,380,283 and 5,334,147 to Johnson; U.S. Pat. No. 5,531,690 to Solar; U.S. Pat. No. 5,690,644 to Yurek et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,613,075 to Healy et al.; and U.S. Re. Pat. No. 36,104 to Solar.
Rapid-exchange dilatation catheters are capable of advancement into the vascular system of a patient along a pre-positioned guidewire, for balloon angioplasty or a similar procedure. The guidewire occupies a catheter lumen extending only through a distal portion of the catheter. With respect to the remaining proximal catheter portion, the guidewire exits the internal catheter lumen through a proximal guidewire port, and extends in parallel along the outside of the catheter proximal portion. Of course, the entire catheter and guidewire assembly is typically contained within the lumen of a guiding catheter, which retains a majority of the catheter and guidewire effective lengths together.
Because a majority of the guidewire is outside the catheter shaft, it may be manually held in place as the catheter is removed. Moreover, because the distal catheter guidewire lumen is shorter than the guidewire length that remains outside the patient, the catheter may be removed while also holding the guidewire, until the guidewire may be grasped at a point distal of the catheter. Completing a catheter exchange simply requires reversing the removal process. This rapid exchange technique enables a single physician to exchange balloon catheters, without requiring guidewire extension to temporarily double the guidewire length.
Stent delivery systems must ideally possess certain characteristics. For example, the stent delivery system should preferably protect the stent from damage or deformation during delivery. It is further desirable that the stent delivery system be flexible and able to push through and traverse as many different anatomical arrangements and stenosis configurations as possible. In addition, the stent delivery system should provide for high visibility under fluoroscopy. Often the stent delivery system will be used in conjunction with an outer guiding catheter, which surrounds and guides the stent delivery system to the desired site. The visibility of the stent delivery system on a fluoroscope may be affected by the size of the lumen through which radiopaque contrast fluid is injected. This fluid is generally injected through the annular space between the guiding catheter and the stent delivery system. The visibility can, therefore, preferably be increased by further reducing the outer diameter of the stent delivery system.
Moreover, the stent delivery system should preferably have a positive mechanism for retaining the stent on the catheter prior to deployment and then releasing and deploying the stent at the desired site. Thus, a delivery system for implanting a self-expanding stent may include an inner catheter or tube upon which the compressed or collapsed stent is mounted and an outer restraining sleeve or sheath that is initially placed over the compressed stent prior to deployment. When the stent is to be deployed in the body vessel or accurately positioned at a damaged site, the outer sheath is moved in relation to the inner tube to “uncover” the compressed stent, allowing the stent to assume its expanded condition. Some delivery systems utilize a “push-pull” type technique in which the outer sheath is retracted while attempting to retain the inner lumen stationary. The delivery system may also use an actuating wire that is attached to the outer sheath. When the actuating wire is pulled to retract the outer sheath and deploy the stent, the inner lumen remains stationary, preventing the stent from moving axially within the body vessel. Many different type of delivery systems have been developed for delivering self-expanding stents, but most require a retractable outer sleeve or sheath.
Because of the narrowness of the human vasculature self-expanding stents, generally, are retained in a highly compressed state within the sheath. As a result of the compressive forces necessary to compress the stent to a small diameter within the sheath or sleeve relatively large forces are required to retract the sheath from the stent. Currently, stent delivery systems utilize hand held devices with pivoting levers to provide the necessary forces to retract the sheath from the stent, i.e., deploy the stent.
In addition to overcoming the sheath retraction problem, a delivery system for self-expanding stents must desirably provide variable speed delivery. Preferably, the delivery system should allow the self-expanding stent to be deployed slowly at first to allow the stent to be accurately positioned at a target site within the vasculature. Once positioned and impinged against the inner vessel wall, it is desirable to provide for more rapid deployment to maintain the position and to increase the speed of the overall procedure. As more of the stent impinges against the wall of the body lumen, the speed of deployment can continue to increase because there is more stent contacting the wall and resisting movement of the stent from its originally deployed position and, therefore, less risk of the stent movement. Hence, there is a need for a delivery system that provides a delivery or deployment speed for self-expanding stents that continues to increase along the length of the stent from a relatively low initial deployment speed to a relatively fast deployment speed as the final portion of the stent is released from the sleeve or sheath.
Some attempts have been made to produce devices that can be operated with a single hand so as to allow a physician to use the free hand to control the movement of the delivery catheter. While generally allowing the user to maintain hand position, these devices have typically not provided a variable rate of deployment of the stent. Two-handed devices have been developed to provide some variable speed capabilities, but these devices generally require the user to alter their hand positions to obtain the variable or differing speeds, which is not desirable as it can lead to inaccurate placement of the stent. These multi-speed devices have used a screw-type mechanism to retract the sheath slowly and then, a sliding mechanism to retract the sheath more quickly. Switching between the two retraction mechanisms requires the user to change hand positions during the deployment of the stent.
Hence, there remains a need for an improved variable speed stent delivery system. Preferably, such a system would allow a user to vary the speed of stent deployment or sheath retraction without requiring a change of hand positions. Additionally, such a delivery system preferably is configured to overcome friction between the sheath and compressed stent in a relatively smooth or fluid manner to facilitate accurate positioning of the stent within a body lumen.
The present invention addresses the above problems by providing a delivery system for deploying stents at a deployment speed that ranges from an initial, relatively slow speed to a final, relatively fast speed. Generally, the delivery system includes a catheter assembly including a guide tube, a retractable sheath slidably mounted on the guide tube, and when loaded, a stent in a compressed state sandwiched between the guide tube and the retractable sheath. A hand-operated deployment assembly is provided in the delivery system that includes a handle housing and one or more rotary knobs or other devices to allow a user to apply a motive force or rotation rate. Within the housing, the retractable sheath is attached to a slider block that is mounted in the handle housing for linear motion, such as by mounting on a slide rod. The slider block is also attached to a flexible drive member, such as a belt segment. A take up pulley is provided in the housing that is connected to the rotary knob, such as by an axle keyed to the pulley and to the knob, to turn at the user input rate. The drive member is attached to the take up pulley such that when the pulley rotates the drive member is wound onto the pulley. The pulley may have a conical cross section to provide a variable speed or as in one embodiment of the invention, a variable overall outer diameter is provided by causing the drive member to be wound upon itself or previously wound portions or thickness. As a result, the retraction or deployment speed automatically increases along the length of the stent being deployed as the overall diameter of the take up pulley increases as a user turns the knob. Hence, for a relatively constant input rotation speed, a substantially continuously increasing deployment speed is produced by the delivery system of the invention.
More particularly, a stent delivery system is provided for deploying a stent at variable speeds. The stent delivery system comprises a catheter assembly having an elongate guide member and an elongate sheath including a lumen in which the guide member is positioned. The sheath is movable relative to the guide member from an initial position in which a loaded stent is sandwiched between the sheath and the guide member to a final position in which the stent is exposed or not restrained by the sheath. The delivery system further includes a deployment assembly having a connector element attached on one side to the sheath. The deployment assembly includes a variable speed mechanism attached to the connector element and operable to move the connector element from a first position to a second position at a retraction speed that varies from an initial speed to a higher final speed. By moving the connector element, the attached sheath is moved from the initial position to the final position at the retraction speed.
According to one aspect of the invention, the retraction speed increases from the first position to the second position of the connector element substantially continuously. The connector element is typically moved along a linear path and the retraction speed can be measured as an increasing linear velocity of the connector element and attached sheath. The variable speed mechanism in one embodiment includes a slide rod mating with an opening or passageway in the connector element so that the connector element is able to slide along the length of the slide rod from its first to its second position. The mechanism further includes a take up pulley and a drive belt or belt segment attached at a first end to the connector element and at a second end to the take up pulley. A knob or other user input device is provided in the deployment assembly for allowing a user to apply a motive force or input rotation rate. The knob is connected to the take up pulley to rotate the pulley at the input rotation rate. When the pulley rotates, the drive belt is wound onto a contact surface of the take up pulley to move the connector element. The retraction speeds are varied or increased with the rotation of the pulley with the drive belt being wound not just on the pulley but also upon previously wound portions or thicknesses of the drive belt. As the overall diameter of the take up pulley increases, the linear velocity of the drive member, i.e., the retraction speed of the connector element and sheath and deployment speed of the stent, also increases for a single input rotation rate. As a result, the delivery system provides a relatively slow initial stent deployment speed to position the stent and, then, continuously increasing deployment speed to rapidly deploy the remaining portions of the stent.
The present invention is directed to a device, and associated method, for delivering stents at a continuously variable speed. More particularly, the variable speed stent delivery system of the present invention is configured for delivering self-expanding stents at speeds that continuously increase from a relatively slow initial deployment speed to a significantly faster final deployment speed. The continuously variable speeds or continuously increasing speeds with the deployed length of the stent facilitates accurate positioning and initial impingement of the deployed portions of the stent against the inner wall of a body lumen while also improving the efficiency of the procedure by reducing the time to deploy the later portions of the stent and reducing risks of the stent being dislodged as the stent is rapidly deployed once positioned.
In general, delivery systems for self-expanding stents include a catheter assembly and a handle or control handle. A proximal end of the catheter assembly is coupled to the handle, and the catheter assembly extends outwardly from the handle. While the catheter assembly may be any useful length, the assembly in one embodiment is preferably between about 50 cm and 200 cm in length.
The catheter assembly comprises coaxial inner and outer tubes. The outer tube is a tubular sheath and the inner tube is a guide tube (or shaft). The sheath has a lumen extending from a proximal end to a distal end, and a stent, such as a self-expanding stent is mounted on the guide tube, and positioned or housed in a compressed state within a distal area of the lumen of the sheath. As will be explained in detail with reference to
The shaft has proximal and distal ends, wherein the proximal end of the shaft has a Luer guidewire hub attached thereto. The proximal portion of the shaft is preferably made from a relatively stiff material such as stainless steel, Nitinol, or any other suitable material known to those of ordinary skill in the art. The shaft also includes a distal portion, which is preferably made from a co-extrusion high density polyethylene for the inner portion and polyamide for the outer portion. Other suitable materials for distal portion known to those of ordinary skill in the art include polyurethane, polyimide, polyetheretherketone, and Nitinol. These materials may be utilized as single or multi-layer structures, and may also include reinforcement wires, braid wires, coils, filaments or the like. The two portions, distal and proximal, of the shaft are joined together by any number of means known to those of ordinary skill in the art including heat fusing, adhesive bonding, chemical bonding or mechanical attachment. The stainless steel proximal end gives the shaft the necessary rigidity or stiffness it needs to effectively push out the stent, while the distal portion provides the necessary combination of flexibility, to navigate tortuous vessels, and column strength to effectively push out the stent.
Preferably, the distal portion of the shaft has a distal tip attached thereto. The distal tip can be made from any number of materials known in the art including polyamide, polyurethane, polytetrafluoroethylene, and polyethylene including multi-layer or single layer structures. The distal tip has a proximal end whose diameter is substantially the same as the outer diameter of the sheath which is immediately adjacent thereto. The distal tip tapers to a smaller diameter from its proximal end to its distal end, wherein the distal end of the distal tip has a diameter smaller than the inner diameter of the sheath. The distal tip helps to prevent blood from entering the sheath as the apparatus is being navigated through the body vessels. In a preferred embodiment, attached to distal portion of the shaft is a stop, which is proximal to the distal tip and the stent. The stop can be made from any number of materials known in the art, including stainless steel, and is even more preferably made from a highly radio-opaque material such as platinum, gold, tantalum, or radio-opaque filled polymer. The stop can be attached to the shaft by mechanical or adhesive bonding, or by any other means known to those skilled in the art. Preferably, the diameter of the stop is large enough to make sufficient contact with the loaded stent at its end without making frictional contact with the inner layer of the outer sheath. The stop helps to “push” the stent out of the sheath during deployment, by preventing the stent from migrating proximally within the sheath during retraction of the sheath for stent deployment.
In one embodiment, proximal to the stop is a sleeve, which can be made from any number of materials known to those skilled in the art including plastic. The sleeve is attached to the shaft immediately proximal to the stop by any number of ways known to those skilled in the art including thermal or mechanical bonding. The sleeve acts to reinforce the stop during deployment of the stent. The sleeve is large enough to make sufficient contact with the stop in order to reinforce the stop. However, it is also preferably small enough not to interfere with the taper of outer sheath when the inner shaft is inside the outer sheath. During deployment, the outer sheath is moved in a proximal direction relative to the stationary inner shaft. The radio-opaque stop also aides in positioning the stent within the target lesion during deployment within a vessel, as is described below.
A radio-opaque marker is attached to the shaft at a point distal to the distal end of the loaded stent. The marker can be made of platinum, iridium coated platinum, gold, tantalum, stainless steel or any other suitable material known in the art. Preferably, the shaft has a guidewire lumen extending along its length, where the guidewire enters through the guidewire hub and exits through its distal tip. This allows the shaft to receive a guidewire much in the same way that a balloon angioplasty catheter receives a guidewire. Such guidewires are well known in the art and help to guide catheters and other medical devices through the vasculature of the body.
Alternatively, the shaft of the present invention may comprise three tubing sections (proximal shaft, distal shaft, and distal tip). The proximal shaft may be constructed of 304 stainless steel hypo-tubing (O.D.=0.032″ and wall thickness=0.0045″) and be approximately 10-12 inches long. The proximal end of the proximal shaft is attached to a typical medical luer connector or “hub”. Use of the stainless hypotubing will provide the necessary stiffness and column strength to support the system while the outer sheath is retracted for stent deployment. The distal shaft may be constructed of a coextruded tube consisting of an outer layer of nylon-12 (or another suitable polymer) and an inner layer of a maleated high-density polyethylene such as PLEXAR PX209, sold by the Quantum Chemical Company. PLEXAR PX209 is a maleated high-density polyethylene that chemically bonds to nylon-12 in the extrusion process. The distal shaft is designed to take advantage of the properties of nylon-12 while providing a lubricous inner lumen for tracking over a guidewire. Also, PLEXAR PX209 polymer bonds tenaciously to stainless steel in a typical heat fusing process. U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,510, issued on Jul. 23, 1996, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, discloses the use of such materials in manufacturing catheters. The distal tip of the inner member may be sealed or insert molded to the distal shaft and constructed of an approximate 25D Shore hardness polyamide elastomer or equivalent. Use of nylon-12 as the outer layer of the distal shaft helps to facilitate this seal. The tip is designed to be a traumatic which can be beneficial when working in the carotid region. Being soft and relatively sticky, the tip may be coated with a hydrophilic coating to provide better lubricity.
The sheath is preferably a polymeric catheter and has a proximal end terminating at a Luer hub and a distal end, which terminates at the proximal end of the distal tip of the shaft, when the stent is in un-deployed position. Preferably, the distal end of the sheath includes a radio-opaque marker band disposed along its outer surface. As will be explained below, the stent is fully deployed when the marker band is proximal to the radio-opaque stop, thus indicating to the physician that it is now safe to remove the apparatus from the body.
In one embodiment, the distal end of the sheath includes an enlarged section, which has larger inside and outside diameters than the inside and outside diameters of the sheath proximal to the enlarged section. The enlarged section houses the pre-loaded stent, the stop, the sleeve, and the stent bed, which is the portion of the shaft over which the stent is disposed. Proximal to the sleeve, the outer sheath tapers proximally to a smaller size diameter. The tapering of the sheath allows for higher injection rates of radiopaque fluid, both before and after deployment of the stent.
Often self-expanding delivery systems had problems with the stent becoming embedded within the sheath or catheter in which it is disposed. To overcome this problem, the sheath preferably comprises an outer polymer, preferably polyamide, layer and an inner polymer, preferably polytetrafluroethylene, layer. Other suitable polymers for the inner and outer layers and include any suitable material known to those skilled in the art including polyethylene, or polyamide, respectively. Positioned between the outer and inner layers is a wire reinforcing layer, which is preferably a braided wire. The braided reinforcing layer is preferably made from stainless steel. The use of braiding reinforcing layers can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 3,585,707 issued to Stevens on Jun. 22, 1971, U.S. Pat. No. 5,045,072 issued to Castillo et al. on Sep. 3, 1991, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,254,107 issued to Soltesz on Oct. 19, 1993, all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The outer sheath can incorporate a single outer polyamide layer from its proximal end to its distal end or can be a series of fused transitions decreasing in material durometer from the proximal end to the distal end along the outer layer of the sheath. The inclusion of transitions of varying material durometers can effectively enhance the catheter performance as it is pushed over the guidewire through the vascular anatomy. The flexibility of the delivery system from the proximal end to the distal end of the sheath can improve the manner in which the system tracks over the guidewire.
The three layers of the sheath collectively enhance stent deployment. They help to prevent the stent from becoming too imbedded into sheath, prior to stent deployment. The braid layer provides radial support to the inner layer creating sufficient resistance to the outward radial force of the stent within the sheath. The inner layer also provides a low coefficient of friction surface to reduce the forces required to deploy the stent. In addition to the above mentioned benefit, the braid layer offers many other advantages. It gives the sheath better pushability, the ability to transmit a force applied by the physician at a proximal location on sheath to the distal tip, which aids in navigation across tight stenotic lesions within the vascular anatomy. The braid layer also gives the sheath better resistance to elongation and necking as a result of tensile loading during sheath retraction for stent deployment. The configuration of the braid layer can be changed to change system performance. This is achieved by changing the pitch of the braid, the shape of the individual braid wires, the number of braid wires, and the braid wire diameter. Additionally, coils could be incorporated similarly to the braid layer of the sheath to minimize stent embedment and enhance system flexibility. Use of coils in catheters can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,279,596 issued to Castaneda et al. on Jan. 18, 1994, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Alternatively, the outer sheath of the system may comprise three tubing sections (proximal sheath, distal sheath, and distal end). The proximal sheath may be constructed of 304 stainless steel hypo-tubing (O.D.=0.065″, I.D. 0.053″) and be approximately 20 inches long. The proximal end of the proximal shaft is attached to a valve that provides a seal to blood flow when closed, and allows free movement over the inner member when opened. Again, the use of stainless steel for the proximal end will give the physician the necessary stiffness and column strength to manipulate the system for deployment. The distal sheath of the outer member is also constructed of a coextruded tube of nylon-12 over the PLEXAR PX209 polymer. The same logic used above applies. We need lubricity over the inner member (provided by the PLEXAR PX209 polymer) and the push and tracking ability of nylon-12. The distal shaft is again heat fused to the stainless steel hypotube.
When being inserted into a patient, the sheath and the shaft are locked together at their proximal ends by a Tuohy Borst valve. This prevents any sliding movement between the shaft and sheath which could result in a premature deployment or partial deployment of the stent. When the stent reaches its target site and is ready for deployment, the Tuohy Borst valve is opened so that the sheath and the shaft are no longer locked together.
During use, the distal portion of the catheter assembly is positioned within a body lumen or vessel with the stent at a target site. The outer sheath is then retracted so as to deploy the self-expanding stent. In this regard, the stent delivery system further includes a control handle connected to a proximal portion of the catheter assembly and, more particularly to the outer sheath to provide the force to retract the sheath. The handle includes a mechanism for retracting the sheath that comprises a belt (or belt segment) or similar element linked or connected to the outer sheath at first end and to a take up pulley at a second end. The connection to the take up pulley enables the continuously increasing deployment speed (or sheath retraction speed) because when the pulley turns, the belt is taken up onto the pulley causing the overall effective outer diameter of the take up pulley to increase by the thickness of the belt wrapped on the pulley. The belt may have a uniform thickness or variable thickness to provide a desired speed/force profile for the delivery system. The change in deployment speed occurs during each rotation of the pulley with more belt and connected sheath being retracted for each rotation of the pulley, thereby effectively changing the deployment/retraction speed and sheath retraction force output for the same input by the user. The input by the user is typically provided by turning a knob connected, such as by one or more gears, to the take up pulley. In some cases, the take up pulley is a conical pulley to provide the varying speed rather than (or in addition to) relying only on the additive belt thickness to increase the pulley's overall outer diameter.
During deployment the outer sheath is moved toward the handle from an initial position (e.g., a pre-deployment or stent loaded position) toward a fully deployed position. The movement or retraction of the sheath occurs at an initial deployment or retraction speed, V1, in response to a force applied to the proximal end of the outer sheath attached to the handle. The initial velocity, V1, is a relatively low speed to allow the stent to be slowly exposed and to initially expand and impinge on the inner wall of the body lumen at a targeted site. Once initial deployment and/or stent impingement have occurred, the sheath preferably is retracted at higher and higher speeds.
Once the sheath has been retracted fully from the stent the stent expands and impinges against the adjacent inner wall of a body lumen (not shown). The sheath is being retracted at its maximum deployment speed, VN, at a point when the stent is fully deployed. In some embodiments, the sheath is retracted at continually increasing speeds from an initial position, Pos. X, to a final deployment position, Pos. Y. Generally, the retraction length as measured from Pos. X to Pos. Y is at least as long as the length of the stent being deployed but more typically, is slightly longer than the length of the stent to ensure that the stent is allowed to fully deploy and does not bind on the distal end of the sheath. The fully deployed position, Pos. Y, of the sheath relative to the inner catheter shaft may be provided by a stop or other device within the control handle to limit the maximum amount of travel of the sheath and to allow an operator to verify when the stent is deployed and the catheter assembly may be removed from the body lumen.
Prior to describing the control handle in detail, it may be useful again to stress that a number of catheter assemblies (or at least distal portion configurations) and/or stents may be used to practice the invention. In other words, the handle is useful with nearly any catheter assembly that employs a retractable outer sheath with an expandable stent. For example, but not as a limitation, the distal portions or catheter assemblies and/or stents described in the following patents, which are incorporated herein by reference, may be used with handle: U.S. Pat. No. 6,375,676 to Cox; U.S. Pat. No. 6,019,778 to Wilson et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,613,075 to Healy et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,117,140 to Munsinger; U.S. Pat. No. 6,520,983 to Colgan et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,443,979 to Stalker et al.; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,129,755 to Mathis et al.
Turning to
To provide selective movement, the slide block 624 includes a channel or, more preferably, an enclosed passageway through which a slide rod 626 passes during operation of the handle 210. In other words, the slide block 624 engages one end of slide rod 626 when the outer sheath 262 is in the extended (or non-extracted or initial or stent loaded) position. The slide rod 626 is attached at the other end to a female luer hub 628, which may optionally be used to pass a guide wire through the slide rod 626, outer sheath 262, and inner catheter shaft 310 via lumen 412. The hub 628 is rigidly mounted within the right and left handle housings 630, 634. The housings 630, 634 include tracks or recessed areas for the slide rod 626 and for the slide block 624 to travel along the slide rod 626 during operation of the handle 210.
A belt or belt segment 670 is provided to apply a force on the slide block 624 and, hence, on the outer sheath 262 to retract the sheath 262. As shown more clearly in
With reference to
The belt 670 is attached at a second end 730 to a take up pulley 656. The belt 670 is attached at 730 to the pulley 656 and wrapped at least partially about the circumference of the take up pulley 656. As a result, the belt 670 is wrapped about the circumference of the take up pulley 656 effectively increasing the outer diameter of the pulley 656 as the belt 670 becomes layered upon itself with each rotation of the pulley 656. As shown, the pulleys 638 and 656 are typically aligned within a single plane so as to more effectively apply or transfer the forces applied to the pulley 656 by an operator to the belt 670 and attached slide block 624 and outer sheath 262.
To allow a user to readily input forces to the belt 670, the handle 210 includes right and left knobs 640, 650, which may be attached with screws 642, 652 or other mechanical means. A shipping lock 646 is optionally provided for locking the knobs 640, 650 during shipment and storage. The knobs 640, 650 may include surfaces or other features to improve gripping by a user, such as rubber or plastic contact surfaces and/or recessed areas for placing fingers within the knobs 640, 650. Further, the knobs 640, 650 may be replaced by other mechanical devices for applying force in a substantially circular pattern such as those found in a reel (i.e., fishing reel) to reduce the need for a user to change hand positions during stent deployment. As will be understood, a person of ordinary skill in the art can use various configurations of the knobs or external force transmission devices 640, 650, all of which are contemplated to be within the scope of the invention.
The take up pulley 656 is housed within the housings 630, 634 as shown in
As discussed, the belt 670 may be formed with a uniform thickness or of varying thickness to obtain a desired deployment speed/force profile. For example, the belt 670 may be thinner proximal to the take up pulley 656 and thicker distal to the take up pulley 656 so as to more gradually increase speed from the initial deployment or retraction speed to the final deployment or retraction speed. As the belt 670 is taken up onto the pulley 656, the diameter of the pulley 656 changes with the thickness profile of the belt 670 wrapped upon the pulley 656. The change in pulley outer diameter changes the amount of sheath 262 that is retracted for each rotation of the take up pulley 656. The control handle 210 of the invention is able to change the speed of sheath retraction and the sheath retraction force output for the same input by the user, i.e., more sheath is retracted for each turn of the knobs 640, 650.
The pulleys 638, 656 may be formed from a number of materials to practice the invention such as plastic (such as Delran, ABS, nylon, acrylic, and the like), metals (such as brass, SS, aluminum, and the like), or other useful material. Further, the number and configuration of the pulleys 638, 656 may vary with those illustrated in
The functioning of the handle 210 and its take up pulley 656 is now more fully explained with reference to
With each rotation of the knobs and linked pulley 656, the deployment speed is increased because the overall outer radius of the pulley 656 is increased by the thickness of the retracted belt. Such a situation is shown in
Although the invention has been described and illustrated with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the present disclosure has been made only by way of example, and that numerous changes in the combination and arrangement of parts can be resorted to by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as hereinafter claimed. For example, a conical pulley may be substituted for the take up pulley shown in the figures with the drive belt typically wrapping in a single layer about the circumference of the pulley, with varying speeds being provided by the changing pulley diameter. A conical pulley also facilitates a deployment system in which the speed varies in an opposite manner to that described, i.e., from fast deployment to slow deployment, by attaching the belt to the larger diameter portion of the conical pulley and causing the belt to wrap about the smaller and smaller sections of the take up pulley with each rotation.
Further, it will be understood that the variable delivery speed system of the invention also provides a varying force that is experienced by a user that enhances smooth and accurate placement of stents. More specifically, the friction and other forces resisting deployment are greatest initially and it is desirable to deploy at slower speeds for accurate placement as these forces are overcome. As friction and other resistive forces decrease, the deployment is quickened and the force required to deploy the stent and operate the delivery system decreases, too. Additionally, the stent itself provides spring forces that assist deployment at these later stages of deployment, which further lessens the amount of input force or torque required from the user or operator of the delivery system.
Priority is herewith claimed under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) from co-pending Provisional Patent Application No.: 60/709,314, filed Aug. 17, 2005, entitled “VARIABLE SPEED STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM”. The disclosure of this Provisional Patent Application is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1988060 | Vollenbroich | Jan 1935 | A |
2934211 | Shivek | Apr 1960 | A |
2939680 | Powell | Jun 1960 | A |
3070057 | Dezzani | Dec 1962 | A |
3562427 | Yano et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3585707 | Stevens | Jun 1971 | A |
3871382 | Mann | Mar 1975 | A |
3881423 | Woods et al. | May 1975 | A |
4256113 | Chamness | Mar 1981 | A |
4553545 | Maass et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4580568 | Gianturco | Apr 1986 | A |
4616648 | Simpson | Oct 1986 | A |
4649922 | Wiktor | Mar 1987 | A |
4665918 | Garza et al. | May 1987 | A |
4723547 | Kullas et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4739762 | Palmaz | Apr 1988 | A |
4760622 | Rohrman | Aug 1988 | A |
4771773 | Kropf | Sep 1988 | A |
4800882 | Gianturco | Jan 1989 | A |
4856516 | Hillstead | Aug 1989 | A |
4886062 | Wiktor | Dec 1989 | A |
4889112 | Schachner et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4913141 | Hillstead | Apr 1990 | A |
4913683 | Gregory | Apr 1990 | A |
4969458 | Wiktor | Nov 1990 | A |
4990151 | Wallsten | Feb 1991 | A |
5019090 | Pinchuk | May 1991 | A |
5026377 | Burton et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5045072 | Castillo et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5049128 | Duquette | Sep 1991 | A |
5054162 | Rogers | Oct 1991 | A |
5102417 | Palmaz | Apr 1992 | A |
5104404 | Wolff | Apr 1992 | A |
5116365 | Hillstead | May 1992 | A |
5133732 | Wiktor | Jul 1992 | A |
5135536 | Hillstead | Aug 1992 | A |
5161547 | Tower | Nov 1992 | A |
5163941 | Garth et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5190552 | Kelman | Mar 1993 | A |
5201757 | Heyn et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5203774 | Gilson et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5209754 | Ahluwalia | May 1993 | A |
5224939 | Holman et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5228452 | Samson | Jul 1993 | A |
5242423 | Goodsir et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5254107 | Soltesz | Oct 1993 | A |
5275622 | Lazarus et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5279596 | Castaneda et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282824 | Gianturco | Feb 1994 | A |
5290295 | Querals et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5290310 | Makower et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5292331 | Boneau | Mar 1994 | A |
5312351 | Gerrone | May 1994 | A |
5312363 | Ryan et al. | May 1994 | A |
5334147 | Johnson | Aug 1994 | A |
5336192 | Palestrant | Aug 1994 | A |
5346498 | Greelis et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5380283 | Johnson | Jan 1995 | A |
5383892 | Cardon et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5387235 | Chuter | Feb 1995 | A |
5391172 | Williams et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5411507 | Heckele | May 1995 | A |
5415664 | Pinchuk | May 1995 | A |
5417708 | Hall et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421955 | Lau et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5433723 | Lindenberg et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443477 | Marin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5449373 | Pinchasik et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5456694 | Marin et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5456713 | Chuter | Oct 1995 | A |
5458615 | Klemm et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5466221 | Zadini et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5480423 | Ravenscroft et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5507768 | Lau et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507769 | Marin et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5509900 | Kirkman | Apr 1996 | A |
5514154 | Lau et al. | May 1996 | A |
5531690 | Solar | Jul 1996 | A |
5536248 | Weaver et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5538510 | Fontirroche et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5556389 | Liprie | Sep 1996 | A |
5562726 | Chuter | Oct 1996 | A |
5562728 | Lazarus et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569296 | Marin et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571086 | Kaplan et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5571172 | Chin | Nov 1996 | A |
5573530 | Fleury et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578074 | Mirigian | Nov 1996 | A |
5591172 | Bachmann et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5591196 | Marin et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601568 | Chevillon et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603721 | Lau et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5605530 | Fischell et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609627 | Goicoechea et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5618300 | Marin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628755 | Heller et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630801 | Roussigne et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645076 | Yoon | Jul 1997 | A |
5649906 | Gory et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5666970 | Smith | Sep 1997 | A |
5669936 | Lazarus | Sep 1997 | A |
5672179 | Garth et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674278 | Boneau | Oct 1997 | A |
5681322 | Hartigan, Jr. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683345 | Waksman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683451 | Lenker et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690644 | Yurek et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693084 | Chuter | Dec 1997 | A |
5695498 | Tower | Dec 1997 | A |
5695499 | Helgerson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695517 | Marin et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697936 | Shipko et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697949 | Giurtino et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704914 | Stocking et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5707376 | Kavteladze et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5709703 | Lukic et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713917 | Leonhardt et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5713948 | Uflacker | Feb 1998 | A |
5716365 | Goicoechea et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716393 | Lindenberg et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720776 | Chuter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725534 | Rasmussen | Mar 1998 | A |
5728158 | Lau et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733303 | Israel et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735893 | Lau et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5738667 | Solar | Apr 1998 | A |
5741298 | MacLeod | Apr 1998 | A |
5749921 | Lenker et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755777 | Chuter | May 1998 | A |
5759186 | Bachmann et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766184 | Matsuno et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769871 | Mers Kelly et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776141 | Klein et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776142 | Gunderson | Jul 1998 | A |
5776161 | Globerman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776186 | Uflacker | Jul 1998 | A |
5780807 | Saunders | Jul 1998 | A |
5782855 | Lau et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5788707 | Del Toro et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795325 | Valley et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800456 | Maeda et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800520 | Fogarty et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807327 | Green et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810768 | Lopez | Sep 1998 | A |
5810837 | Hofmann et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810869 | Kaplan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810872 | Kanesaka et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814062 | Sepetka et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824058 | Ravenscroft et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833694 | Poncet | Nov 1998 | A |
5840064 | Liprie | Nov 1998 | A |
5843088 | Barra et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843092 | Heller et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843120 | Israel et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843244 | Pelton et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851210 | Torossian | Dec 1998 | A |
5860998 | Robinson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
RE36104 | Solar | Feb 1999 | E |
5868755 | Kanner et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873906 | Lau et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879382 | Boneau | Mar 1999 | A |
5891154 | Loeffler | Apr 1999 | A |
5906579 | Vander Salm et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906619 | Olson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913897 | Corso, Jr. et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919225 | Lau et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5925061 | Ogi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928246 | Gordon et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931842 | Goldsteen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944727 | Ahari et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951585 | Cathcart et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961536 | Mickley et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968052 | Sullivan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968053 | Revelas | Oct 1999 | A |
5968068 | Dehdashtian et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968069 | Dusbabek et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972018 | Israel et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980515 | Tu | Nov 1999 | A |
5984225 | Enzinna | Nov 1999 | A |
5992000 | Humphrey et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997562 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004328 | Solar | Dec 1999 | A |
6015429 | Lau et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019778 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027509 | Schatz et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039744 | Forber | Mar 2000 | A |
6039749 | Marin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042597 | Kveen et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045536 | Meier et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6071263 | Kirkman | Jun 2000 | A |
6071286 | Mawad | Jun 2000 | A |
6077295 | Limon et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080140 | Swaminathan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083194 | Lopez | Jul 2000 | A |
6090035 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090063 | Makower et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090128 | Douglas | Jul 2000 | A |
6096009 | Windheuser et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6096045 | Del Toro et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6096056 | Brown | Aug 2000 | A |
6102942 | Ahari | Aug 2000 | A |
6110191 | Dehdashtian et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113607 | Lau et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117140 | Munsinger | Sep 2000 | A |
6117165 | Becker | Sep 2000 | A |
6117167 | Goicoechea et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123723 | Konya et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129755 | Mathis et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136007 | Goldsteen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136572 | Benatti et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143014 | Dehdashtian et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6143021 | Staehle | Nov 2000 | A |
6146415 | Fitz | Nov 2000 | A |
6149680 | Shelso et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156053 | Gandhi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6156054 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6156063 | Douglas | Dec 2000 | A |
6159228 | Frid et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159239 | Greenhalgh | Dec 2000 | A |
6167315 | Coe et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168610 | Marin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6168617 | Blaeser et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174327 | Mertens et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183509 | Dibie | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190360 | Iancea et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190393 | Bevier et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190406 | Duerig et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203550 | Olson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203558 | Dusbabek et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210422 | Douglas | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217585 | Houser et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224608 | Ciccolella et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238402 | Sullivan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238415 | Sepetka et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241692 | Tu et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245100 | Davila et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248122 | Klumb et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251132 | Ravenscroft et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254608 | Solar | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264689 | Colgan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270521 | Fischell et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273895 | Pinchuk et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287322 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312407 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319262 | Bates et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332403 | Weise et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342067 | Mathis et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344053 | Boneau | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348065 | Brown et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358274 | Thompson | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6375676 | Cox | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383211 | Staehle | May 2002 | B1 |
6391050 | Broome | May 2002 | B1 |
6391051 | Sullivan, III et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6395020 | Ley et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402760 | Fedida | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413269 | Bui et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6443979 | Stalker et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6443982 | Israel et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461381 | Israel et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6488703 | Kveen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500248 | Hayashi | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514261 | Randall et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517569 | Mikus et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6520983 | Colgan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527779 | Rourke | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6572643 | Gharibadeh | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6599296 | Gillick et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6613014 | Chi | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6613075 | Healy et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629981 | Bui et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645238 | Smith | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652506 | Bowe et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6660031 | Tran et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660827 | Loomis et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663666 | Quiachon et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6695862 | Cox et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6716190 | Glines et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6716238 | Elliott | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6749627 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755854 | Gillick et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6773446 | Dwyer et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6786918 | Krivoruchko et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6821292 | Pazienza et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6866669 | Buzzard et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6884259 | Tran et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6911039 | Shiu et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913613 | Schwarz et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6939352 | Buzzard et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6939370 | Hartley et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7033368 | Rourke | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7052511 | Weldon et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7122050 | Randall et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7172617 | Colgan et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7294135 | Stephens et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7323006 | Andreas et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7381216 | Buzzard et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
D576725 | Shumer et al. | Sep 2008 | S |
D578216 | Dorn et al. | Oct 2008 | S |
D578643 | Shumer et al. | Oct 2008 | S |
D578644 | Shumer et al. | Oct 2008 | S |
D578645 | Shumer et al. | Oct 2008 | S |
7506650 | Lowe et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7550001 | Dorn et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7553322 | Dorn et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
D598543 | Vogel et al. | Aug 2009 | S |
7582054 | Okada | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20010007082 | Dusbabek et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010044621 | Klumb et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051822 | Stack et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020004663 | Gittings et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020035394 | Fierens et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020116044 | Cottone et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020151955 | Tran et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020183827 | Derus et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188341 | Elliott | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030028236 | Gillick et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030049295 | Guggenbichler et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050686 | Raeder-Devens et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074045 | Buzzard et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030163085 | Tanner et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167060 | Buzzard et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191516 | Weldon et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040006380 | Buck et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040098083 | Tran et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040143160 | Couvillon | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148009 | Buzzard et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153137 | Gaschino et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181239 | Dorn et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186547 | Dorn et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193180 | Buzzard et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193283 | Rioux et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199240 | Dorn | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050004515 | Hart et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021123 | Dorn et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027306 | Krivoruchko et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033402 | Cully et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060016 | Wu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080476 | Gunderson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085851 | Fiehler et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090890 | Wu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050149159 | Andreas et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182475 | Jen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050209670 | George et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209672 | George et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209674 | Kutscher et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240254 | Austin | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050256562 | Clerc et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273151 | Fulkerson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288764 | Snow et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060058866 | Cully et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074477 | Berthiaume et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085057 | George et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100686 | Bolduc et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060167467 | Rourke | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060259124 | Matsuoka et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276873 | Sato | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016164 | Dudney et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070050006 | Lavelle | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055339 | George et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055342 | Wu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073379 | Chang | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073389 | Bolduc et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088421 | Loewen | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100420 | Kavanagh et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100422 | Shumer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100429 | Wu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112409 | Wu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118201 | Pappas et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118206 | Colgan et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070168014 | Jimenez et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070191864 | Shumer | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191865 | Pappas | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191925 | Dorn | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070194483 | Guggenbichler et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233222 | Roeder et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244540 | Pryor | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255390 | Ducke et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090024133 | Keady et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090099638 | Grewe | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100004606 | Hansen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036472 | Papp | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100094399 | Dorn et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100168756 | Dorn et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174290 | Wuebbeling et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2155527 | Aug 1994 | CA |
2544371 | Apr 1976 | DE |
03132323 | Apr 1983 | DE |
295 16 712 | Dec 1995 | DE |
04420142 | Dec 1995 | DE |
19539449 | Apr 1997 | DE |
29717110 | Nov 1997 | DE |
298 16 878 | Dec 1998 | DE |
29522101 | Dec 1999 | DE |
19901530 | Jul 2000 | DE |
19936059 | Feb 2001 | DE |
20000659 | May 2001 | DE |
69521346 | Apr 2002 | DE |
0436303 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0518838 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0564894 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0611556 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0630657 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0633756 | Jan 1995 | EP |
688545 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0699451 | Mar 1996 | EP |
712614 | May 1996 | EP |
0747021 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0752896 | Jan 1997 | EP |
790041 | Aug 1997 | EP |
792627 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0873733 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0876804 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0947212 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1025813 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1078611 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1095634 | May 2001 | EP |
1117341 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1132058 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1155664 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1181906 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1199051 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1290989 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1299050 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1302178 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1383446 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1440671 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1447057 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1447058 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1637092 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2 760 351 | Sep 1998 | FR |
2797761 | Mar 2001 | FR |
2797781 | Mar 2001 | FR |
WO-9521593 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO-9526775 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO-9618359 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO-9820811 | May 1998 | WO |
WO-9823241 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 98 30173 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO-9852496 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO-9904728 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO-9925280 | May 1999 | WO |
WO-9944541 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO-9947075 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO-9951167 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0002503 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO-0000104 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO-0002503 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0016718 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO-0018330 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO-0071059 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0078246 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-0078248 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-0132102 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-0134061 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0147436 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO-0147436 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO-0158387 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO0198421 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-0189421 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0203889 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-0203888 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-0203889 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-02066094 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO-02083036 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-02087470 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-02102279 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO-03002020 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03061724 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO-2005004515 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO-2005039448 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2005053574 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005062980 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005065200 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005117759 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO-2006104143 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2007002713 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007005799 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007022395 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007029242 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2007044929 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007083470 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2008034793 | Mar 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070060999 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60709314 | Aug 2005 | US |