Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6296080
-
Patent Number
6,296,080
-
Date Filed
Wednesday, June 21, 200024 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, October 2, 200123 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 187 373
- 187 374
- 187 375
- 187 376
- 188 180
- 188 188
- 188 189
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
In an elevator safety braking device, a variable traction mechanism in a rotary actuator allows the drive wheels of the rotary actuator to operate at a reduced preload during normal elevator operation. When engaging, a higher preload is necessary. In the event of safety braking, the variable traction mechanism increases the preload on the drive wheel to ensure timely and proper safety engagement. The variable traction mechanism therefore allows the drive wheels to be subjected to a reduced preload during normal operation, thus relaxing the design criteria for the drive wheels while maintaining reliability.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to elevator safety braking systems, and in particular, to a variable traction mechanism for a rotary actuator that reduces the required preload on the actuator.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Elevator systems generally include an elevator car suspended by a rope (as wire cables are called within the elevator industry) or coated steel belt system. The car is guided along guide rails within an elevator hoistway so that relatively little lateral motion is imparted to the car during use. Passenger elevators are required to have a braking system to halt the elevator car in an overspeed event. Such a braking system is commonly activated by an actuation device known as a governor. The governor detects excessive speed of the car and actuates an emergency stop device.
The governor system typically consists of sheaves at the top and bottom of the hoistway with a governor rope reeved in an endless loop over both sheaves. A part of the governor rope is connected to a safety link that is mounted on the elevator car frame. As the car ascends and descends, the governor rope travels with it, rotating the sheaves. One of the sheaves has a centrifugal governor mounted in it, so that when the sheaves rotate too fast, paired flyweights or flyballs rotating on a spindle are accelerated outward by centrifugal force, where they trip an overspeed switch, thus cutting power to the elevator drive motor. If further overspeed occurs, a clamping device is actuated that clamps onto the governor rope to activate the braking safeties, bringing the elevator car to a safe albeit abrupt stop.
More modern systems omit the stationary governor pulley and rope combination by fitting each elevator car with its own governor, such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,377,786 (Nakagawa) or in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/428,023 filed on Oct. 27, 1999 and entitled ROTARY ACTUATED OVERSPEED SAFETY DEVICE, incorporated herein by reference.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Briefly stated, in an elevator safety braking device, a variable traction mechanism in a rotary actuator allows the drive wheels of the rotary actuator to operate at a reduced preload during normal elevator operation. When engaging, a higher preload is necessary. In the event of safety braking, the variable traction mechanism increases the preload on the drive wheel to ensure timely and proper safety engagement. The variable traction mechanism therefore allows the drive wheels to be subjected to a reduced preload during normal operation, thus relaxing the design criteria for the drive wheels while maintaining reliability.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a variable traction mechanism includes a rotary actuator; first and second wheels pivotably connected to an elevator car via first and second linking members, respectively; the first and second wheels riding on opposing sides of a guide rail for the elevator car; the rotary actuator including means for sensing when the first wheel exceeds a predetermined speed of rotation and locking the first wheel to the rotary actuator; a first spring acting between the second wheel and a first pivot point on the rotary actuator; a second spring acting between a center of the second wheel and a second pivot point on the rotary actuator; and wherein the first and second pivot points are located such that a friction force between the first wheel and the guide rail times a length of a normal to a direction of the friction force passing through a center of the first wheel plus a second spring force of the second spring times a length of a normal to a direction of the second spring force passing through the center of the first wheel is greater than a first spring force times a length of a normal to a direction of the first spring force of the first spring passing through the center of the first wheel.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
shows a rotary actuator and actuator drive wheel connected to an elevator car guide rail.
FIG. 2
shows a side view of the rotary actuator and actuator drive wheel of FIG.
1
.
FIG. 3
shows a variable traction mechanism according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4
shows a schematic diagram used to explain the variable traction mechanism of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to
FIG. 1
, a rotary actuator
10
preferably of the centrifugal force type is operatively connected to an elevator car guide rail
12
by an actuator drive wheel
14
. A shaft
16
of actuator drive wheel
14
is preferably also the shaft inside actuator
10
, but may be connected in an any conventional manner.
Referring to
FIGS. 2-3
, a variable traction mechanism is shown generally at
5
. A lift rod
18
is operatively connected at one end to actuator
10
and at another end to a safety roller
20
at a pivot point
41
. Safety roller
20
is inside a safety block
22
. Actuator drive wheel
14
and a second drive wheel
15
are connected to an elevator car
24
by two pivoting linking members
26
,
27
. During normal operation, rotary actuator
10
freewheels when elevator car
24
travels at less than a predetermined safety tripping speed. If elevator car
24
reaches the safety tripping speed, actuator
10
locks to actuator drive wheel
14
, which pulls up lift rod
18
causing safety roller
20
to jam between safety block
22
and car rail
12
, thus forcing elevator car
24
to an abrupt stop.
Wheels
14
,
15
are preloaded by a first spring
28
so that adequate force is transmitted to safety roller
20
to properly engage the safety. The magnitude of the preload on wheels
14
,
15
during routine elevator operation directly affects the required diameter of wheels
14
,
15
to achieve acceptable wheel life. First spring
28
is preferably connected through linking member
27
and connects to rotary actuator
10
at a pivot point
42
. A second spring
30
is preferably connected between an axle
32
of wheel
15
and a pivot point
43
in rotary actuator
10
. Second spring
30
is approximately 1,000 times less stiff than first spring
28
. During normal elevator operation, first spring
28
and second spring
30
have approximately the same preload, but the deflection of first spring
28
is minute. Any wear of the mechanisms or variations in the thickness of car rail
12
thus cause negligible rotation of rotary actuator
10
, thereby maintaining the proper preload on first spring
28
. In operation, if rotary actuator
10
senses an overspeed condition and locks to wheel
14
, the load on first spring
28
increases and the load on second spring
30
decreases.
Referring to
FIG. 4
, the geometry of mechanism
5
is defined such that the friction capability at the wheel-rail interface ensures compression of spring
28
and concurrent lifting of safety roller
20
. During application of rotary actuator
10
, there is a moment resisting safety engagement and a moment supporting safety engagement. The moment resisting safety engagement is (F1*a), while the moment supporting safety engagement is (μN*b)+(F2*c), where μN is the friction force in Newtons, F1 is the spring force of spring
28
, F2 is the spring force of spring
30
, a is the length of the normal to F1 passing through the center of shaft
16
, b is the length of the normal to μN passing through the center of shaft
16
, and c is the length of the normal to F2 passing through the center of shaft
16
. The geometry of mechanism
5
is then defined such that the following relationship is always true: (μN*b)+(F2*c)>(F1*a). As actuator
10
rotates in the direction shown by the arrow, distance a lessens, thus the moment resisting safety engagement decreases as actuator
10
rotates.
While the present invention has been described with reference to a particular preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the preferred embodiment and that various modifications and the like could be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
Claims
- 1. A variable traction mechanism, comprising:a rotary actuator; first and second wheels pivotably connected to an elevator car via first and second linking members, respectively; said first and second wheels riding on opposing sides of a guide rail for said elevator car; said rotary actuator including means for sensing when said first wheel exceeds a predetermined speed of rotation and locking said first wheel to said rotary actuator; a first spring acting between said second wheel and a first pivot point on said rotary actuator; a second spring acting between a center of said second wheel and a second pivot point on said rotary actuator; and wherein said first and second pivot points are located such that a friction force between said first wheel and said guide rail times a length of a normal to a direction of said friction force passing through a center of said first wheel plus a second spring force of said second spring times a length of a normal to a direction of said second spring force passing through said center of said first wheel is greater than a first spring force times a length of a normal to a direction of said first spring force of said first spring passing through said center of said first wheel.
- 2. A variable traction mechanism according to claim 1, wherein said first spring force is approximately 1,000 times as great said second spring force.
- 3. A variable traction mechanism according to claim 1, wherein said rotary actuator is connected to a lift rod for a safety roller of an elevator safety block.
- 4. A variable traction mechanism according to claim 1, wherein said means for sensing includes a centrifugal force sensor.
US Referenced Citations (4)
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
5-262472 |
Oct 1993 |
JP |