This invention relates to transformers, and more particularly to high frequency “dc-dc” transformers for power conversion and the like, though it is not limited to that application.
Ser. No. 10/904,371 teaches a coaxial push-pull transformer using modules, and in particular teaches how to arrange and dispose the modules and their termination for low parasitic inductance through field cancellation in counter-flowing currents.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,023,317 teaches a cellular transformer.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,665,357 teaches a matrix transformer, and more particularly, teaches various embodiments of variable transformers.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,093,646 teaches an arrangement of the magnetic cores of a matrix transformer for improved high frequency characteristics, and in particular, reduced leakage inductance.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,978,906 teaches a method of minimizing leakage inductance by grouping together the terminals of adjacent transformer sections and treating them as if they were from the same transformer section. This can be done only if all of the sections of a transformer are operating in the same mode.
Ser. No. 10/709,484, FIG. 9, and 60/473,075 and 60/479,706 teach turning on both switches of a synchronous rectifier to short circuit a transformer winding.
Ser. No. 10/905,668 and 60/593,110 teach a coaxial transformer module having synchronous rectifiers and an ac shorting switch across the secondary push-pull winding. The ac shorting switch may be off and the synchronous rectifiers may be operated normally, or both of the synchronous rectifiers may be turned off and the ac shorting switch may be turned on to short circuit the secondary winding.
Additional information on matrix transformers and prior art variable transformers can be found in a tutorial, “Design and Application of Matrix Transformers and Symmetrical Converters”, a seminar given by Edward Herbert at the Fifth International High Frequency Power Conversion Conference '90, in Santa Clara, Calif., May 11, 1990.
This invention teaches an improved variable transformer in which sections of the transformer are effectively removed by electronic switching to change its effective ratio. Synchronous rectifiers rectify the secondary current to provide a dc output current. To change the effective turns ratio, the synchronous rectifiers are turned off and an ac shorting switch is turned on.
This invention teaches improved coaxial and cellular transformer modules having their terminals grouped closely together, to reduce the leakage inductance in associated external circuits.
This invention teaches that the magnetic cores of the coaxial transformer modules may have recessed ends for terminal egress.
In the figures, like numbered items in different drawings designate the same part or an identical part.
The magnetic core 9 can be made of any suitable magnetic material, such as ferrite or pressed powdered metal, as examples, not limitations. The metal inserts 2 and 3 must be insulated from each other, as would be understood by one skilled in the art of transformers. As examples, not limitations, the windings 2 and 3 can be insulated from each other by an insulator between them or a tape or insulating coating applied to one or the other or both. The windings 2 and 3 can be bonded together with an insulating bonding material as a subassembly. As examples, not limitations, the bonding material could be double-sided adhesive tape or an adhesive such as epoxy having in it an aggregate that would keep the metal parts separated.
If the magnetic core 9 is not insulating, the magnetic core 9 must also be insulated from the metal inserts 2 and 3. As an example, not a limitation, the magnetic core 9 may be insulated by a coating such as epoxy. Instead of, or in addition to, insulating the magnetic core 9, the windings 2 and 3 may be coated with an insulating layer except at the contact area of the terminals 7, 8, 21 and 22.
Alternatively, and whether they are insulated or not, the metal inserts 2 and 3 may be keyed and kept apart by molded tabs 11, which lock the surface mount terminals 7, 8, 21 and 23 in place once they are folded back. Notice that the magnetic core 9 is relieved on the ends so that the conductors to the terminals 7, 8, 21 and 22 may be below the surface of the magnetic core 9 on the ends of the magnetic core 9.
The module 20 of
In addition, the windings 31 and 32 are shown as “U” shaped channels, the “U” being sideways, with the bottoms of the “Us” facing each other. This “open coaxial” construction may be an acceptable trade-off against fully enclosed coaxial windings and it may be easier to make, particularly for prototypes or short production runs that do not justify more elaborate tooling.
Primary windings 52 and 53 pass through the tubes 43 and 44 respectively. When the primary winding 53 is conducting, current flow is as indicated by the several arrows designated I. Because the transformer modules 41 have single turn primary and secondary windings 53 and 44, 44, the currents flowing in the secondary windings 44, 44 equals the current flowing in the primary winding 53 (neglecting the magnetization current).
Again, the several arrows designated I indicate current flow when the primary winding 53 is conducting. It can be seen throughout the transformer, the current flow is balanced by counter-flowing currents, to reduce the parasitic inductance in the terminations of the transformer 60.
This module 81 has four times the flux capacity as the module 20 of
The module 20 of
For higher voltage operation, requiring longer cores (or several, stacked end to end), this space may be quite long.
The special folded module 71 of
In the module 81 of
U.S. Pat. No. 4,978,906, entitled “Picture Frame Matrix Transformer”, which issued Dec. 18, 1990, taught a transformer in which the terminations of adjacent sections were treated as if they were from the same section, the currents being equal. This works well as long as the entire transformer operates in the same mode, and the module 20 of
U.S. Pat. No. 4,978,906 teaches a matrix transformer that has been optimized for high frequency operation. As in the present invention, the terminals of the transformer sections have been grouped together so as to minimize leakage inductance. U.S. Pat. No. 4,978,906 uses sets of four cores with tapered ends arranged in a repeating square pattern. The windings are plain wire. U.S. Pat. No. 4,978,906 does not teach nor anticipate using a variant of the coaxial transformer or the cellular transformer arranged in parallel rows, and it would not be obvious to one skilled in the art of transformers to make the modules of the present invention from the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 4,978,906.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,979,982, the circuit of FIG. 12 is characterized as a switched current power converter 91, but the matrix transformer 93 can also be used as a variable transformer. U.S. Pat. No. 6,979,982 is the first example to teach the short-circuiting of both halves of a push-pull secondary winding. By shorting both halves of the push-pull secondary winding, the circulating current in the short-circuited state is one half what it is if only one side of the push-pull winding is short-circuited. Because losses are a function of the square of the current (I2R), the losses in the transformer element is one half even though the resistance factor is double.
The plurality of switches 94a-94m are necessary to prevent a short circuit of the output voltage Vo during the time that both of the synchronous rectifiers 97a to 97m and 98a to 98m of any element 93a-93m of the matrix transformer 93 are on. This extra series switch 94a-94m is an extra loss when the synchronous rectifiers 97a to 97m and 98a to 98m are alternating and the current is going to the output capacitor 95 and the load, a problem that is solved by the present invention.
A primary winding 105, excited by a voltage source Vp, and consisting of two primary winding sections 105a and 105b, passes through first and second elements 103a and 103b of a matrix transformer 103. The matrix transformer 103 has two magnetic cores 107 and 109, and two secondary push-pull windings 111 and 113. Under normal operation, rectifiers 115a, 115b, 116a and 116b rectify the current from the secondary windings 111 and 113, and the currents are taken in parallel to an output Vs. The equivalent turns ratio is 2:1.
If a MOSFET 119 is turned on, the current from the second element 103b of the matrix transformer 103 is shunted to ground through the rectifiers 117a and 117b, which back biases the rectifiers 116a and 116b. This effectively short-circuits the second element 103b of the matrix transformer 103, effectively removing it from the output and effectively changing the equivalent turns ratio from 2:1 to 1:1. In 1990, synchronous rectifiers were not practical for power converters.
When the MOSFET 119 is turned on, one side only of the secondary winding 113 is short-circuited, depending upon the polarity of the exciting voltage Vp. Only one of the rectifiers 117a or 117b will be forward biased, and thus conducting. Accordingly, the full secondary current circulates when the secondary is short-circuited, in contrast to the half of the current that flows in the present invention.
This circuit 141 is to control a section of a variable transformer, and using it with the coaxial push-pull transformer is the preferred embodiment of this invention, but the coaxial push-pull transformer is shown as an example, not a limitation. The same circuit and control methods may be applied to cellular transformers (U.S. Pat. No. 7,023,317) and other matrix transformers.
In the variable transformer, the section of the coaxial transformer 153 may operate normally by operating synchronous rectifiers 165 as in any transformer secondary circuit to rectify the output of the push-pull secondary windings 159 and 161 to an output capacitor 167 and a load (not shown). In the example, the output current will be I, the same magnitude as the primary current I (annotated by an asterisk * as being 50% duty-cycle—meaning that each side of the primary current has a 50% duty-cycle so that the secondary output current, when rectified, is a dc current). A Clock input, (also annotated as 50% duty-cycle), controls the synchronous rectifiers 165 through logic 169. An On logic input enables the synchronous rectifiers 165. This logic and synchronizing method is shown as an example, not a limitation. One skilled in the art of power conversion would know how to design appropriate control means for diverse applications and requirements.
To change the ratio of a variable transformer, one or more sections of the transformer are effectively removed by electronic switching. In the example of the circuit 141 of
In contrast to prior methods of controlling a variable transformer, it is both sections of the push-pull secondary windings 159 and 161 that are shorted, effectively two turns in series, so that the short circuit current circulating in the push-pull secondary windings 159 and 161 and the ac shorting switch 171 is one half of the magnitude of the primary current I. Further, in contrast to the circuit of
In the examples in this specification, push-pull secondary windings are shown with a rectifier in each side of the push-pull secondary winding to produce a full-wave rectified output. An alternative transformer could use the familiar full-wave bridge of four rectifiers to achieve a full-wave rectified output, using either synchronous rectifiers or diodes. A full-wave bridge is usually connected to the start and the end of a secondary winding, and so is the ac shorting switch of this invention. No center-tap connection is needed. For this specification and the claims, a full-wave bridge connected to the start and to the end of a secondary winding is the equivalent of a push-pull secondary winding with two rectifiers in that both circuits produce a full-wave rectified output. A transformer module of either configuration may be “removed” from a variable transformer by turning off the rectifiers and turning on an ac switch connected to the start and to the end of the secondary winding. If synchronous rectifiers are used, they are turned off by the control logic. If diodes are used, they are turned off by turning on the ac switch, which will cause them to be back biased.
By folding the transformer section 181 twice, the start and end terminals 189 and 191 are brought together in a tight pattern so that the external circuitry can be connected with optimally low parasitic impedance. When a section is very short, as in the module 20 of
In
Then folding of the transformer section 181 of
For this specification and the claims, a transformer module is defined as being “a folded module” if the module is constructed as taught in
An ac switch is defined as a switching device that will conduct current in either direction when on, and which will block current of either polarity when off. As an example, not a limitation, back-to-back MOSFETs may be configured as an ac switch.
The very low inductance and excellent coupling in a coaxial push-pull transformer are due to a large part to the coaxial nature of the conductors, the primary winding being a center conductor in a coaxial secondary conductor and having appropriate external circuits and connections to ensure the same phasing in the primary and secondary. When both halves of a push-pull secondary winding are short-circuited by an ac switch, the circulating current is one half of the push-pull primary current. When the current of the phase of the push-pull primary that is on passes through the corresponding coaxial secondary winding, and an equal and opposite counter-flowing current will flow, initially, on the inside surface of the coaxial secondary winding. To satisfy the transformer relationships, only half of this current leaves the transformer through the terminals, and the other half circulates back on the outside of the coaxial secondary winding. This in turn induces an equal and opposite current in the second secondary winding, and this current also leaves the transformer through the terminals, being the same series current.
To maintain optimally low parasitic series inductance, the two halves of the push-pull secondary winding must be well coupled, and this is accomplished by having their surfaces closely proximate one to the other and as wide as practical. In
In time, the 10 A flowing on the inside surface of the tubular secondary winding 209 and the 5 A flowing on the outside surface will blend as a net current of 5 A, but initially the high frequency effects, and in particular, the skin effect (penetration depth), keeps these currents separated. It is during this initial period that parasitic impedance, and in particular, the parasitic inductance, is so critical. Note that the facing surfaces of the first and second tubular secondary windings 207 and 209 are broad and closely spaced and have counter-flowing equal currents for cancellation of the far field, minimizing of the leakage inductance.
For transformers having a large turns ratio, it will cut the total turns in half and make a simpler construction if a single primary winding passes in series through both halves of the push-pull secondary winding. By definition, a “full wave primary winding” is a single primary winding passing in series through both halves of the push-pull secondary windings of all of the modules. This contrasts with a “push-pull primary winding” in which, by definition, has a first half of the push-pull primary winding that passes in series through the first halves of the secondary windings of all of the modules and a second half of the push-pull primary winding that passes in series through the second halves of the secondary windings of all of the modules.
Many power converters have a power factor correction circuit as their input, and a primary voltage sourced from such an input may have a voltage of 400 V or more, as an example, not a limitation. A modern computer-type electric circuit may require an output voltage of 3.3 V, or less, as an example, not a limitation. For design purposes, the effective input voltage is a little less, and the output voltage is a little more, to allow for series voltage drops in other components, but a turns ratio in the order of 120 to 1 is needed for a full-bridge topology, and half that, or 60 to 1 for a half-bridge topology, as an example, not a limitation. Doubling the winding in order to use the preferred winding configuration significantly increases the design complexity and may be justified only for high power transformers. Accordingly, there is an incentive to use one winding in series, as shown in
The cellular transformer is taught in U.S. Pat. No. 7,023,317, and
The variable transformer of
Each of the n transformer sections 301a-301n has respectively a secondary winding 303a-303n that is a push-pull secondary winding. Each of the n secondary windings 303a-303n has its center-tap connected to return, as an example, not a limitation. In alternative circuit arrangements, the center-taps may be connected together as the output.
Each of the n transformer secondary windings 303a-303n has a first rectifier, respectively rectifiers 305a-305n, and a second rectifier, respectively rectifiers 306a-306n. The first and second rectifiers 305a-305n and 306a-306n are shown schematically as switches, but in practical circuits they may be synchronous rectifiers or diodes, as examples, not limitations. Synchronous rectifiers may be MOSFETs, and they may be turned on alternately, as would be well known by one skilled in the art of power converters. Diodes are also switches, being characterized as being on when forward biased and off when reverse biased.
At least one of the secondary windings 303a-303n has an ac shorting switch 304a-304n connected across the entire push-pull winding. When operating as a normal transformer, all of the ac shorting switches 304a-304n are open, and all of the first and second rectifiers 305a-305n and 306a-306n are operated alternatively in the usual manner of full wave rectifiers. If they are synchronous rectifiers, their drive and timing may be controlled by a control circuit 308, entitled “Voltage Control (PWM)”. As shown, when operating normally, the ratio of the transformer 301 is n to 1, as is usual for matrix transformers, if the primary winding has one turn. If they are multiple turns, having p turns per section, the effective turns ratio is n p to 1, or the product of the number of sections times the number of turns per section, as is usual for matrix transformers.
Note that the number of primary turns need not be equal in every module. Unequal turns in different modules is a useful method of obtaining different transformer turns ratio. Also, the secondary windings may have a different number of turns in different modules, and it is even possible that some modules will use a push-pull secondary winding with push-pull rectifiers and others may use a single winding (either one or multiple turns) with full-bridge rectifiers. While it makes the ratio calculations more complicated, it does not change the teachings of this invention if such primary and/or secondary winding are used. For simplicity, equal whole windings are used for the examples, but it is not a limitation.
The ratio of the transformer 301 can be varied by electronic control by turning off the rectifiers 305a-305n and 306a-306n for one or more of the transformer sections 301a-301n and by turning on the respective ac shorting switch 304a-304n. If m sections remain in the normal mode (ac switch off, rectifiers normal), the transformer ratio will be m to 1, if the primary winding sections are single turn, or m p to 1 if each has p turns. If there are not equal primary turns in each module, the calculations are more complicated, but the principle is the same. When the synchronous rectifiers 305a-305n and 306a-306n for any of the transformer sections 301a-301n are operating normally, the ratio is calculated including that module in the calculation. If the synchronous rectifiers 305a-305n and 306a-306n are both off and the ac shorting switch 3034a-304n is on, for any of the transformer sections 301a-301n, the ratio is calculated as if that module were not present.
If the rectifiers 305a-305n and 306a-306n are synchronous rectifiers, both rectifiers of the section must be turned off by the control logic 308 when the respective ac switch 304a-304n is turned on. If they are diodes, they will turn off without any other action when the ac switch is turn on because both will be reversed biased.
If the ac switch 304a-304n of any section 301a-301n is turned on, that section is effectively removed from the variable transformer 300 because the ac short on the secondary will reflect to the primary 302a-302n and there will be no appreciable voltage drop in the primary winding of that section. The primary voltage drop will be across the remaining sections 301a-301n as if the section 301a-301n with its respective ac switch 304a-304n turned on were not there.
If the ac switch 304a-304n of any section 301a-301n is turned on, that section is effectively removed from the variable transformer 300 because with the rectifiers turned off, no current will reach the output capacitor 307 and the output Vo. It is as if it were not there.
Additional information on matrix transformers and prior art variable transformers can be found in a tutorial, “Design and Application of Matrix Transformers and Symmetrical Converters”, a seminar given by Edward Herbert at the Fifth International High Frequency Power Conversion Conference '90, in Santa Clara, Calif., May 11, 1990.
Several figures in the tutorial show variable matrix transformers with schematic switch symbols, in particular, FIGS. 4.8 through 4.10. The tutorial and these drawings do not teach nor anticipate the use of a switch from the start to the end of a push-pull winding so that the circulating current is one half, nor would it be obvious to one skilled in the art of power converters to do so from these drawings.
In
As an example, not a limitation, let n equal 4 for the variable transformer 300 of
If two sections are pulse width modulated as described above, the ratio will vary between 2 to 1 and 4 to one. That value is continuously variable as a function of the duty-cycle of the pulse width modulation.
If it is known, for a particular design, that the ratio always has a minimum value, then some of the modules may have synchronous rectifiers only, and only the number of modules need be modulated as is required to produce that minimum value. In our example, if the transformer ratio should always be greater than 2 to 1, then only two of the modules need to be variable.
Alternatively, however, the same variable ratio can be achieved by varying the duty cycle of all of the modules by pulse width modulation. Preferably, the duty-cycles of the various modules will be off set in time (multi-phased or interleaved). This has the beneficial effect of equalizing the operating conditions of the modules. In particular, it reduces the maximum flux density in all of the modules, which will likely result in a significantly reduced total core loss.
There is another mode of operation that can be used with a variable transformer. In many power converters using transformers, the primary excitation is pulse width modulated to control the output voltage. To reduce the output voltage relative to the input voltage, a low duty-cycle may be needed, which decreases the efficiency. In the examples in this specification, a “100 percent” duty-cycle primary excitation is used, but this is not a limitation. The wave-form of the primary current, including pulse width modulation, does not alter the teachings of this invention, only the calculations of the output voltage which must then account for the duty-cycle of the primary excitation. A possible scenario is to use the variable ratio feature of the transformer as a “range selector” while the duty-cycle of the primary excitation is used for intermediate control of the output voltage. In this scenario, the modules of the variable transformer do not have to switch as frequently, yet the duty-cycle of the primary excitation may be kept high by changing the ratio of the variable transformer as needed.
Note that the switching circuits described in this specification are simplified schematics, to highlight the teachings of the invention without undue clutter. One skilled in the art of power converters and like circuits would understand how to use the invention and provide other circuits and components necessary for practical circuits. As illustrations, not limitations, there may snubbers, clamps, EMI filters, power supplies and conditioning circuits, surge protection, over current protection, and so forth. There may be additional logic and measurement circuits, and control and driver integrated circuits. There may be additional digital logic or analog circuits within or associated with a circuit to meet the requirements of a particular application.
In particular, one skilled in the art of power converters would know how to implement the various driver circuits for the various switches, the primary excitation, the rectifiers and the ac switches. He would know how to implement the timing and control circuits for pulse width modulation, phasing, interleaving and so forth, and he would know how to compensate the feedback control. A commercial power converter has a number of accessory functions that are not described here as they are not at the heart of the invention, yet they must be included in the commercial power supply. One skilled in the art of power converters would know how to use this invention as taught by this specification and would know how to integrate the accessory functions, timing and controls to make a practical power converter.
For this specification and the claims, a “high frequency matrix transformer” is a transformer as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,093,646 “High Frequency Matrix Transformer”; U.S. Pat. No. 7,023,317 “Cellular Transformers”; U.S. Ser. No. 10/904,371 “Coaxial Push-pull Transformers for Power Converters and Like Circuits” or the improved coaxial and cellular transformers disclosed in this invention. The high frequency matrix transformer comprises a plurality of transformer modules. The primary winding of the high frequency matrix transformer is wound through all of the transformer modules as in
This application is a continuation in part of a patent application entitled “Coaxial Push-pull Transformers for Power Converters and Like Circuits”, Ser. No. 10/904,371, filed Nov. 6, 2004, which issued on Oct. 10, 2006 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,119,648. That application is a continuation in part application of a patent application entitled “Switched-Current Power Converter”, Ser. No. 10/709,484, filed May 8, 2004, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,979,982 on Dec. 27, 2005. Priority is claimed to a provisional application entitled “Switch-current Power Converter”, Ser. No. 60/473,075, filed May 23, 2003 and a provisional patent application entitled Parallel Current Sources for Switched-Current Power Converters, Ser. No. 60/479,706, filed Jun. 19, 2003. These applications are incorporated herein by reference. Ser. No. 10/904,371 is also a continuation in part of a patent application entitled “Cellular Transformers”, Ser. No. 10/708,846, filed Mar. 27, 2004, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,023,317 on Apr. 4, 2006. Ser. No. 10/708,846 is a continuation in part of a provisional patent application of the same name, Ser. No. 60/460,333, filed Apr. 3, 2003. These applications are incorporated herein by reference. Priority is not claimed to these applications. This application is also a continuation part of a patent application entitled “Total Charge Measurement”, Ser. No. 11/163,308, filed Oct. 13, 2005. Priority is claimed to a provisional application entitled “Switched Current Power Converter”, Ser. No. 60/593,110, filed Dec. 10, 2004. These applications are incorporated herein by reference. This application is also a continuation in part of a patent application entitled “Dual Source MOSFET for Low Inductance Synchronous Rectifier”, Ser. No. 10/905,668, filed Jan. 14, 2005. This application is incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 4,665,357, entitled “Flat Matrix Transformer”, which issued May 12, 1987. Reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 5,093,646, entitled “High Frequency Matrix Transformer”, which issued Mar. 3, 1992. Reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 4,978,906, entitled “Picture Frame Matrix Transformer”, which issued Dec. 18, 1990.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2412902 | McElvain | Dec 1946 | A |
3768055 | Oliver | Oct 1973 | A |
4159457 | Charpentier | Jun 1979 | A |
5093646 | Herbert | Mar 1992 | A |
6137392 | Herbert | Oct 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60593110 | Dec 2004 | US | |
60479706 | Jun 2003 | US | |
60473075 | May 2003 | US | |
60460333 | Apr 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10904371 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 11423957 | US | |
Parent | 10709484 | May 2004 | US |
Child | 10904371 | US | |
Parent | 10708846 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 10709484 | US | |
Parent | 11423957 | US | |
Child | 10709484 | US | |
Parent | 11163308 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 11423957 | US |